hahaha

Lmao 😂

It is no coincidence that nearly every Russian home has a cat.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Yeah then like mine they bring in mice then rats to terrorize me !!!

The new boss was much worse

@@josephmarzullo sure was

Good

No they didn’t there’s no actual evidence of that

I've been looking around online in many different places and I am unable to find any reports at all of this happening. Do you happen to have a link or some kind of source I could look at to see more details?

Based. That's how monarchy should be treated.

@@jewellry The commander of the assassins, Yakove Yurovsky admitted to it in his memoir. And some other guards too, I think.

we dont know.

what did the communist i russia screwed? they indsutrlize russia and improve living condition

There are 5 misconceptions in your statement.

They targeted their own smart people too right? The intellectual ones?lol

@@klarachiamarsi5935 which ones?none

Capitalism ❤

💯 makes the rivalry all the more poetic

They were Cousins

They were first cousins. Also related to the German chancellor

@@SA-5247 you mean Kaiser right

Everything fails but capitalism works because it is greed that’s it that’s the goal. It’s just Darwinism

Firstly, that system was never tried under the conditions that it was meant to be. Secondly, how has it been futile? Please explain, because what I see is a system that guarantees housing, food, worker’s rights, healthcare, and education. And yes, there is and has been plenty of democracy in these states too

@@adonis1310 Lol, what conditions? orchestrating revolutions around the entire planet at the same time, then find a way to control it all with one government? it's ridiculous It guarantees that it guarantees that, where would it come from? from thin air? everyone is still paying for everything, they just pay not only for their own self

The system in itself was never built to succeed for the people. It was a system implemented by a aristocracy of Jewish Bolsheviks to exploit and oppress the native Russians. So then the question is did it succeed in the eyes of that aristocracy? I say it did seeing as it’s ideals and government form still remains today. But it was and never will be a system of government built to be ran by the peasantry

@@adonis1310 If you can not tell your government is full of shit, when it is, and live then that is why communism goes bad.

Standards of living went down in a lot of post Soviet states btw after the collapse of the Soviet Union

​@mateoa7675 sure in the same way your addict brother feels worse when you stop giving him drugs

​@@Dan16673lmfao sure, thats why 150 million former citicens were driven into abject poverty by being forcibly removed from job or home, or why an entire generation of children had to reaquaint itself with child prostitution, something that the territories of the union hadnt seen since the tsarist years... Certainly its just withdrawal from magical state money-

​@@Dan16673What?

Manmade indeed . . . by the British and French who blockaded the Baltic and Black seas and didn't allow the Soviet government to buy seeds.

@@DanHalper bulls***, the USA even sent them food aid which the fools rejected

@@DanHalperwhy would a communist country need to buy anything 🤔

I don't think the Bolsheviks tried to abolish money, ive read a lot on the Revolution but not that. There was one major famine during the civil war, which can be explained by sabotage from both sides. If you demolish railroads and bridges (which happens a lot during a war) then it becomes difficult to get food from one place to another

@@raymondhartmeijer9300 Let's keep in mind the position of the Bolshevik government in the world at the commencement of the Civil War. Although the Bolshevik government had a very different ideology and different set of international ties than the Tsarist government or the Provisional government . . . it essentially inherited a situation where Russia had made by far the largest manpower commitment to the allied war effort against the Central Powers but had paid the entire price for the western allies failures in Belgium, France, Italy and the Ottoman lands, especially the western allied failure at the Dardanelles which left the Black Sea in the hands of the Central Powers -- the Black Sea being a crucial route by which the western allies could have resupplied Russia. Also in the hands of the Central Powers until late 1918 was the Baltic Sea. This meant that all supplies to Russia had to go through the Arctic. This was a major reason for the fall of the Tsar and the fall of the Provisional Government. The Bolsheviks, having accepted German aid to knock off Kerensky, inherited this gigantic mess and had no choice but to capitulate in early 1918 and essentially become an economic neo colony of Imperial Germany . . . this part of the story is generally poorly understood. However, the Germans finally did lose in the west, and Bolshevik Russia was able to essentially declare independence from its German masters in late 1918, a couple months prior to Germany's capitulation in the west. At this moment, the western allies had a choice, they could help Russia rebuild or they could even further destroy its economy by dumping surplus war materials on a bunch of rag tag armies staffed by formerly monarchist officers. They chose to do the latter. Why? Hard to say. Maybe it was a measure to try to prevent Bolshevik influence from seeping into Eastern Europe but that happened anyway. Regardless, because of this mad plot, largely on the part of Winston Churchill, World War I was extended on Russian territory with the Civil War that didn't end until Crimea was conquered or liberated whichever one you want to use in March 1920. Then it got extended even a bit more with the war with Poland which ended with the Bolsheviks at the gates of Warsaw but defeated in August 1920. So yes, famines occurred in this time frame. Western scholarship and public opinion attributes these famines to something like communists don't know how to farm, communists just want their people to starve. And, in truth, over the course of time, the Soviets achieved a lot more with industrial production than with agricultural production. But that's not the whole story. Why don't we ever ask ourselves, did the British and French have the right to finance armies on the territory of their former ally, armies whose goals were rather mysterious. Sure, the Bolsheviks did repudiate the Tsar's debts but could these White armies have made the proper payments to western bond holders? And if they did, how would they have managed to do it? Russia was insolvent. Why was it insolvent, simple . . . its insolvency was the result of it sacrificing almost 10 million men to the cause of British and French colonialism. All through World War I, Russia bled and bled and bled to prevent Germany from conquering France which it surely would have succeeded in doing. Given Russia's sacrifice, maybe Britain and France could have forgiven the debt without the Bolsheviks having to repudiate it. Well it would have been tough for them to do that because they owed so much money to the USA. So essentially because British and French colonialism had bankrupted itself with debts in order to crush Germany, they had to finance a bunch of hapless monarchist armies on Russian territory and when these poorly led armies got their butts whipped, then their descendants whine about Bolshevik failures in agriculture . . . also confusing the famines of the early 1920's with the period of the first 5 year plan which was a decade later. So yes, the 1920 famine in the Soviet Union was absolutely man made . . . made in Paris and London, perpetrated through their completely unjustifiable continued block of the Baltic and Black Seas, their refusal to grant any credits to the Bolshevik government or even accept payment for imported goods like seeds even in gold . . . leaving the Soviet State with only Sweden as a trading partner. The war with the Whites wrecked the railroad system and forced the early Bolshevik state to put about 50 percent of GDP into the military . . . compare that to the NATO guideline of 2 percent.

@@slappy8941 Russian history in a nutshell

It would seem that they followed an ideology, that was contrived of an alcoholic, who had no trade skills.

Indeed

2 idiots met

Russia is purgatory of a country

*or after

Just as many murders if not more. Trotsky was a monster also

In my humble opinion

Certainly would have been much different although in my opinion not much better for life or freedom for the average citizen.

Trotsky would eventually have tried to invade neighboring countries. Trotsky viewed communism as something that needed to be spread worldwide. Stalin was more focused on the USSR and although he also wanted it to spread, he was more focused on the USSR

Bread queues were already thing? During ww1 women would go from the factory after a 10 hour shift to a 10 hour bread queue.

@bentrinker1937 Your clearly missing the point 😂

@@bentrinker1937 yeah imagine bread lines in PEACE time

In your dead brain maybe

I disagree....China and Vietnam have proven this statement in correct ...

Truth is secretly the western world (CIA, Mi6) did everything in their power to disrupt socialist governments...look at Chile in 1964 ....Nicaragua, El Salvador, Panama, Trinidad , Angola ...too many examples of capitalists GREED to control resources.

@@beejohn1016 china is more capitalist than communist

@@beejohn1016 china and Vietnam are mostly capitalism. North Korea is the only state that actually tries communism still.

Everything in the United States, from fuel to food, is subsidized. You may think it's purely capitalist, but it isn't.

That is what's most foolish about people proposing communism as a solution to powerful capitalist monopolies taking over the country, by pushing communism you simply give them an even more direct pathway to absolute monopoly and domination over the entire country.

Ohh have you been to Russia and interviewed millions of soviets lmfao.... like bruh wtf

60% of Russians miss communism, look it up

The never ending nazi finnish hysteria…

You should do a video about paranoid schizophrenia.

@@jasonjames4254You should do one on enabling gullibility

@@jasonjames4254 he is right. Don’t be so naive.

@@valhalla9688 Trump's Chumps are the ones that are naive. You'll believe anything your TRAITOR dictator tells you! Meanwhile, he gives our nuclear secrets to his buddy and idol Putin.

@@jasonjames4254 you should watch a documentary about secret cult's and mind control through propaganda

And also the Russian folks…..

Not for the mongels

Mongol Empire had no problem conquering all of Russia for a few hundred years.

@@drscopeify …. More like robbing…. Rome conquered by building roads and building and things called cities Mongol were paid to stay away… lol

@@La_ne88 Kalinka

That was a decade later

is because jewish are smarter.

Well except that it wasn't . . . the real hidden hand behind the Bolsheviks wasn't any particular minority group (although ethnic minorities were highly concentrated at the top of the party. . . . but that should be a seen as a good thing) it was rather, the foreign ministry of the German empire who wanted to and did finance Lenin to knock the Romanov Empire and the later Transitional government out of the war . . .which they did. The Bolsheviks kind of had the good luck that their major puppet master conveniently collapsed about 10 to 11 months after the October Revolution and was no longer able to enforce the Treaty of Brest Litovsk. But that doesn't diminish the significant contribution Wilhelmine Germany made to the revolution and in case you don't know. Kaiser Wilhelm was not Jewish and neither was almost anyone in his government . . . except Walter Rathenau and he didn't end up in a great place either.

@@DanHalper 99% of the leaders were J'ish otherwise about 2% of the Russian population. That is not a coincidence no matter what way you try and twist it.

@@DanHalper Ive replied three times and all have been deleted with in a minute or so...

The bolsheviks weren’t Jewish lmao I’m still amazed this lie keeps getting pushed around. And I bet money that you’re lying about it being referred to as the Jewish Bolshevik movement. I’m reading a book written by an English scholar of Russian history who wrote a book on the Russian revolution. It was published in the mid 90s and at no point is it referred to as the Jewish Bolshevik movement. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_People's_Tragedy

It's called Super size Me and the guy is Morgan Freeman

Its the World at War doc series from the BBC from 1973. Laurence Olivier is narrating.

@@TheMykr0 Thank you so much!

Yes, monarchy is far better than Marxism. Really, anything is better then Marxism.

Isn't that more or less what Putin's Russia is today? A dictatorship/monarchy run by oligarchs pretending to be communists.

No

@@caiolima5016yeah communism seems like it was undoubtedly the right choice 🙄😂

@@caiolima5016 yes

Read "Socialism: Utopian and Scientific" for heavens sake- Marx and Engels spent a decade struggling against the Utopianists...

Also youre just straight up delusional if you think capitalism in its nature strives towards anything but increased shareholder profits and monopolisation.. Or that good living standards affect anyone but those living in the imperial core of advanced capitalist countrues...

Wow it's like the video ready comment. It didn't become Petrograd when the Communists took over. The Tsar changed the name in 1914

They did join it pretty early though afaik? That aside though he was an anti war voice from what i heard

there are 100 million graves filled with people who found out. See, the problem is there will always, and i mean always, arise a stalin. Someone more ruthless than you will take hold of the massive centralized power structure, and they will want to maintain their grip so first things first, the revolutionaries must face wall. Now how do you suppose the resources get divvied up by a ruthless leader? Fairly? With equity in mind? How about "the exact same way a king or other despot would do it", because that's exactly what happens. You can have all the bright shiny ideals in the world but human nature will win that fight. Every time. We have 100 million graves to testify this is so.

care to explain which ones?

Not enough clicks

Rasputin was largely unimportant unless you looked at disneys anasthasia for history, no offense

the communism you believe in is a myth. a story losers living and benefiting from capitalism talk about on reddit... not actually real.

It was Communist. Can't make excuses for their failure. Marxism always fails

Yes, the old "it wasn't real communism" argument. Meanwhile in reality everywhere in the real world where communism was tried it resulted in the same blood soaked brutality. You see you can't have communism if there are people who won't play ball. There are always too many people who want to be free.

that’s the trotskyist line of thinking. the nationalization and collectivization of industry are two socialist modes of production alternate to corporate ownership of the means of production.

@@redsamson5185 Trotsky was a Bolshevik. He helped create the Bureaucracy, he only complained about it when the Bureaucracy turned on him, Trotsky and Lenin also labeled the Workers of Petrograd and the Sailors as traitors for simply wanting to stay true to the Original Soviets of Workers. The Bolsheviks had the Bourgeoise in their party and so became the Ruling Class. Leninism is a small group of Intelligentsia that maintains a tight circle of Party members. It's not so difficult to imagine that the working class stopped having a say in the government or in the factories and stopped having the means of production after the Kronstadt Rebellion. It was the Bureaucracy that owned the means of production not the working class.

Nothing to do with jews. Try something else

And a 12grams of Marxism.

100% accurate

huh? women were gave numerous rights in the ussr not given under the tsarist autocracy and gender pay differences were destroyed

Misogynist much?

🐐

This is weird

how's life as an incel?

So if a communist movement rises to power again in the future and manges to win the world over this time, will you acknowledge capitalisms defeat? Nice of yah.

🤨🤨wtf r u on about

Long live Putin and Russia!

👎🏻 🇺🇦🇷🇺🇮🇱🇵🇸 👍🏻 🇺🇸 AMERICA FIRST!