+Alias Fakename fuck you

That true

Me: Yeah! Seems so peaceful around here. Also me: Mestizos and Amerindians rule! White people (white Caucasians, white Asians and yellow Asians) are batshit crazy! Lol XD

RetrolyzeHD ️️ heres some pepper to cover the amount of saltiness you have, *gives pepper*

Kid, Why makeup a lot of bullshit? I checked your stats and most are wrong. Going by the crap you upload, you seem to have a big jealousy problem with Mexicans. The poverty rate in Mexico is at 43.6, and the highest poverty is found in states with the highest Indian and black citizens, like Veracruz, Oaxaca, Tabasco, Chiapas and Campeche. Black Americans Join gangs in larger numbers then Hispanics and Graduation rates nationwide are black students graduated at a rate of 69 percent; Hispanics graduated at 73 percent; whites graduated at a rate of 86 percent.

diego suarez Or All slavs being Russian. For Western Europe.

Waffen SS you to waffen go back to ur main land Scotland or wherever ur grandpa came from. Wasn’t it u who was saying they got German ancestry?

The falklan islands isn't Argentina

My problem with mestizos is they think everyone in "latin" america accepts a eurocentric term such as hispanic or latino. Mainly mexican are highly uneducated on the indigenous population. I speak quichua thats not latin nor hispanic.

DJ Trevi Hard for mestizos to claim any land when they denied their indigenous side for centuries. whine but now yall from spain to them. Mestizos want to pretend they are from spain 100% but spain wont give them home cuz they dont even look spanish now mexicans are without a homeland. Navajo land got benefits and rights and they are never told that its not their home cuz they never gave up their native tongue. tough titties. not conquistadors fault cuz if that were true castilian would be the only language in Spain. Yep spanish is not a language its a nationality because catalan, galician, valencian etc. Are languages that are spanish. Oh they still fight to keep their language Til this day, watch the riots online, doing this even though they still officially apart of spain. What excuse for mestizos? plenty of videos of these "pure" latin people denying indigenous cultural rights so keep blaming the conquistadors when its mestizos shutting the door on us.

Know what i hate? :/ the shit in the cences crap saying we talk Spanish at home when we actually speak it in public too

Yea not to mention how the more generations after immigration the less Spanish they know

@@felixxdenolo6793 this was true before globalization, now u.s.a. is on it's way to become a bilingual country, wich is ok, it's atrend all around the world, mainly with english

@@matirei3266 usa was always bilingual when german migrate in the us they speaked german when italian migrate in us they speaked italian etc....

Land is cheap in Africa, just start communities

nah, it's just easier/more comfortable to put different people in one group. In my country, we refer to muslims as "Turks", it's easier.

In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the dominant Anglo-Americans relegated the Hispanics living in New Mexico to second-class social status, due to unfamiliarity and prejudice. Some of these "Anglos" were ethnocentric, deprecating Hispanic/Mexican culture and questioning the people's fitness for democracy. Some claim, in response, they constructed a "Spanish American" identity in an early instance of cultural citizenship (expressing Americanism through ethnic identity) Around 1920, the term "Spanish-American" replaced "Mexican" in polite society and in political debate. The new term served both the interests of both groups. For Spanish speakers, it evoked Spain, not Mexico, recalling images of a romantic colonial past and suggesting a future of equality in Anglo-dominated America. For Anglos, on the other hand, it was a useful term that upgraded the state's image, for the old image as a "Mexican" land suggested the violence and disorder associated with that country's civil war in the early 20th century. This had discouraged capital investment and set back the statehood campaign. The new term gave the impression that "Spanish Americans" belonged to a true "American" political culture, making the established order appear all the more democratic. New Mexico contributed some 17,000 men to the armed services during World War I. Thousands more from the state fought for the Allies during World War II. World War I gave the Hispanics the opportunity to demonstrate American citizenship by participating in the war effort. New Mexico proportionately suffered the loss of more servicemen than any other state in the nation in ww2. Their wartime contributions improved the conditions of minority citizenship for Nuevomexicanos but did not entirely eliminate social inequality.

R6bravo my grandparents are Hispanos from New Mexico. Not Mexicans but Spanish.

Eliseo Martinez haha yea right

junior1497 on god. They aren’t Mexican they’ve been there since Spain controlled it. For 20 years it was part of Mexico but they didn’t do no business there so the Spanish Nationality stuck.

@Paul Tello JAJAJAJAJAJAJA all the texan culture is based on Mexican culture so stfu

@Paul Tello In 1824 Mexico’s authoritarian ruler Agustín de Iturbide enacted a colonization law authorizing the Mexican federal government to allow legal immigration into Texas. This statute allowed foreigners to gain title to land. Mexican liberals argued in favor of allowing foreigners to immigrate. This would satisfy multiple objectives, including promoting economic growth, increasing the number of males available to defend the country, and bringing new capital and skills into the country to replace those lost when many Spaniards were expelled or chose to leave the country. The process for gaining an official land title was expensive and time-consuming, and many residents chose not to have the land surveyed or complete the application process. The Mexican law required immigrants to practice Catholicism and stressed that foreigners needed to learn Spanish and all people wishing to live in Texas were expected to report to the nearest Mexican authority for permission to settle. Many Americans immigrated to Mexico, where land was cheaper. A few Americans who had become naturalized Mexicans settled in Texas during that time. Most of the immigrants came from the southern United States. Immigration of United States had begun to accelerate rapidly. The new population was not fully assimilated and by 1826, approximately 3,000 Americans from the United States were living illegally in Texas. Most of the immigrants came from the southern United States. Many were slave owners, and most brought with them significant prejudices against other races, attitudes often applied to the Tejanos. Most Anglo Americans tried to isolate themselves from Mexicans. By 1830, Texas had a population of 7,000 foreign-born residents, with only 3,000 Mexican nationals. In regard to slavery, influential settler Stephen F. Austin, who reasoned that the success of his colonies needed slave labor and the economics it produced to lure more whites to the area. Anglos from the United States soon vastly outnumbered the Tejanos. Mexican authorities became increasingly concerned about the stability of the region.The colonies teetered at the brink of revolt in 1829, after Mexico abolished slavery. In response, President Anastasio Bustamante implemented the Laws of April 6, 1830, which, among other things, prohibited further immigration to Texas from the United States, increased taxes, and reiterated the ban on slavery. The law explicitly banned any further immigration from the United States to Texas and any new slaves. The new Law rescinded all empresario contracts that had not been completed and prohibited Americans from settling in any Mexican territory adjacent to the United States. Secretary of State Lucas Alamán, who wrote the 1830 law, said that "Texas will be lost for this Republic if adequate measures to save it are not taken. Law of April 6, 1830 under President Anastasio Bustamante was issued because the Mexican state of Texas was in danger of being annexed by the United States. New issued settlement contracts were brought under federal rather than state control. Provisions of the law were designed to encourage Mexican citizens to move from the interior to Texas. Mexicans who agreed to relocate to Texas would get good land, free transportation to Texas, and some financial assistance. Convicts would be sent to Texas to build fortifications and roads to stimulate trade. The lack of a formal policy had not stopped many immigrants. Settlers simply circumvented or ignored the laws. A number of people had left the United States to settle in the Mexican northern provinces.The ban and other measures did not stop US citizens from migrating to Texas by the thousands, and by 1834, it was estimated that over 30,000 Anglos lived in Texas, compared to only 7,800 Mexican-born residents. Mexican authorities noted that slave reforms passed by the state were being ignored. By the end of 1835, almost 5,000 enslaved Africans and African Americans lived in Texas, making up 13 percent of the non-Indian population (The Mexican rules were widely disregarded and slavery remained in Texas until the end of the American Civil War).The attitudes of the immigrants prompted the Mexican-American War on February 2nd 1848, in which Mexico lost almost 55 percent of its territory to the United States drawing a bullshit line trough territory that used to be nothing but Mexico and some of these territories we know currently as Arizona,NewMexico,Texas,Nevada and of course California. All of those states used to be absolutely Mexico! so now you have people who are indigenous here who were made foreigners on there own land. Mexicans form part of the U.S. history. We have the right to be in this land. America is not a country it's a continent. I don't know what's more criminal; crossing over a borderline of a country looking for the economic opportunity that allows you to work and earn or... going to another land across an ocean, taking over land killing &pushing its native people into concentrated areas, creating a trail of tears, deceiving other people of their true intentions and really trying to collect all these peoples gold to take it to their royal families killing"civilizing" them as they settle &conquer, or also bringing along a group of people who they used to perform hard labor of fields with no pay other than food,roof,lynching,shooting,cutting,burning!!!

cri cro yeah your fucking stupid because Spain ruled Texas far longer than Mexico

@@sierra5713 Do u honestly think Apaches, Piutes, Navajos, Chumash, Hopi, and other tribes living in the present US southwest would have casinos today had their lands remained under Mexico's authority??

@Jose Stevenson . I agree!

then fix the drug problem.

@@warthunder9155 it’s actually the South American countries bringing in the drugs into Mexico

@@cookieboylover1360 So no large quantities of drugs come from mexico?

@@warthunder9155 no they mostly come from people who migrant from South America into Mexico

@@cookieboylover1360 Both of my statements are still true. US troops in ww2 came from france and went into germany even though they originally came from the US. On top of that Mexico needs to fix the drug problem.

I have the perfect name for it New Mexico

SteelCity1981 in you dreams.

johann duchow salt

SteelCity1981 nyet, it would be part of a communist Mexico.

Alejandro Cabrera oh no where not joining Mexico stay independent

She must be an albino blond Mexican.

@@binzsta86 >> Not really, there are *A LOT* and I'm telling you *A LOT* of white Mexicans, typical blond European.

I've seen ginger Mexicans before

You must be extremely ignorant of history.

It's not uncommon to see white people in Latin America. There lots of whites, but they are a minority.

Technically the USA has to return Florida to Spain in 2050

@@legado804 really?

@@legado804 really?

@@legado804 omg

@@legado804 how can you explain pls

Please do a video on Dravidian people of India nd Pakistan

"hispanic" is not an invention of USA, here in spain we commonly use it like with the hispanic day and more "Dia de la Hispanidad "(this 12 of october btw :D). the term itself it's a reminder of our cultural union with our old colonies. latino by the other hand its an invention of the french and the british to cut this union with us, by the +1800's .

that would be racist :/ (joke)

Masaman hi

Masaman, can you do a video of the situation in Catalonia?

No.

@@amethmendives8332 yes, i am from Puerto Rico and i can confirm what alwin said

No shit...

@@justinus8608 I mean not that much

@@jaguarmemez dude we only share language and colonizer.

Very true, it's like saying Italians and french people should also be described as "Latino."

Southern Europeans, different than northern/Nordic Europeans, central Europeans, and Eastern Slavic Europeans.

Very true! That is how many Latin Americans and other spanish countries outside of the Americas feel when they are put in a Mexican category. And the real Hispanics are from Spain in Europe.

Same for me, I have Spanish, German and probably french ancestores, I'm not gonna fill out that stupid thing

Erudito otidurE HOW ABOUT I DO ANYWAY?

Thank you for warning me

Erudito otidurE Screw it I’ll take your advice

I was gonna go thru this comment section just to see how much they would piss me off but I think i'll take your advice.

Thanks

They actually are by technicality. However, the latino/latinoamericano demonym is usually applied to Hispanic countries and Brazil, but ironically it was the French who started trying to culturally unify the Romance-speaking countries with the word "latino".

Grünes Licht Paraguay is a South American country that have two official languages the Spanish and guarani(a native language) and most of the population speaks guarani only in the frontier with Bolivia people speak Spanish why are they consider latinos?

Medio Litro in Quebec my friend in Quebec.

Just Quebec, Anglo Canadians dont count.

@@another90daystochangethis34 Very good point. To this day, there is a league of "Latin" countries which has its headquarters in Paris.

In 1824 Mexico’s authoritarian ruler Agustín de Iturbide enacted a colonization law authorizing the Mexican federal government to allow legal immigration into Texas. This statute allowed foreigners to gain title to land. Mexican liberals argued in favor of allowing foreigners to immigrate. This would satisfy multiple objectives, including promoting economic growth, increasing the number of males available to defend the country, and bringing new capital and skills into the country to replace those lost when many Spaniards were expelled or chose to leave the country. The process for gaining an official land title was expensive and time-consuming, and many residents chose not to have the land surveyed or complete the application process. The Mexican law required immigrants to practice Catholicism and stressed that foreigners needed to learn Spanish and all people wishing to live in Texas were expected to report to the nearest Mexican authority for permission to settle. Many Americans immigrated to Mexico, where land was cheaper. A few Americans who had become naturalized Mexicans settled in Texas during that time. Most of the immigrants came from the southern United States. Immigration of United States had begun to accelerate rapidly. The new population was not fully assimilated and by 1826, approximately 3,000 Americans from the United States were living illegally in Texas. Most of the immigrants came from the southern United States. Many were slave owners, and most brought with them significant prejudices against other races, attitudes often applied to the Tejanos. Most Anglo Americans tried to isolate themselves from Mexicans. By 1830, Texas had a population of 7,000 foreign-born residents, with only 3,000 Mexican nationals. In regard to slavery, influential settler Stephen F. Austin, who reasoned that the success of his colonies needed slave labor and the economics it produced to lure more whites to the area. Anglos from the United States soon vastly outnumbered the Tejanos. Mexican authorities became increasingly concerned about the stability of the region.The colonies teetered at the brink of revolt in 1829, after Mexico abolished slavery. In response, President Anastasio Bustamante implemented the Laws of April 6, 1830, which, among other things, prohibited further immigration to Texas from the United States, increased taxes, and reiterated the ban on slavery. The law explicitly banned any further immigration from the United States to Texas and any new slaves. The new Law rescinded all empresario contracts that had not been completed and prohibited Americans from settling in any Mexican territory adjacent to the United States. Secretary of State Lucas Alamán, who wrote the 1830 law, said that "Texas will be lost for this Republic if adequate measures to save it are not taken. Law of April 6, 1830 under President Anastasio Bustamante was issued because the Mexican state of Texas was in danger of being annexed by the United States. New issued settlement contracts were brought under federal rather than state control. Provisions of the law were designed to encourage Mexican citizens to move from the interior to Texas. Mexicans who agreed to relocate to Texas would get good land, free transportation to Texas, and some financial assistance. Convicts would be sent to Texas to build fortifications and roads to stimulate trade. The lack of a formal policy had not stopped many immigrants. Settlers simply circumvented or ignored the laws. A number of people had left the United States to settle in the Mexican northern provinces.The ban and other measures did not stop US citizens from migrating to Texas by the thousands, and by 1834, it was estimated that over 30,000 Anglos lived in Texas, compared to only 7,800 Mexican-born residents. Mexican authorities noted that slave reforms passed by the state were being ignored. By the end of 1835, almost 5,000 enslaved Africans and African Americans lived in Texas, making up 13 percent of the non-Indian population (The Mexican rules were widely disregarded and slavery remained in Texas until the end of the American Civil War).The attitudes of the immigrants prompted the Mexican-American War on February 2nd 1848, in which Mexico lost almost 55 percent of its territory to the United States drawing a bullshit line trough territory that used to be nothing but Mexico and some of these territories we know currently as Arizona,NewMexico,Texas,Nevada and of course California. All of those states used to be absolutely Mexico! so now you have people who are indigenous here who were made foreigners on there own land. Mexicans form part of the U.S. history. We have the right to be in this land. America is not a country it's a continent. I don't know what's more criminal; crossing over a borderline of a country looking for the economic opportunity that allows you to work and earn or... going to another land across an ocean, taking over land killing &pushing its native people into concentrated areas, creating a trail of tears, deceiving other people of their true intentions and really trying to collect all these peoples gold to take it to their royal families killing"civilizing" them as they settle &conquer, or also bringing along a group of people who they used to perform hard labor of fields with no pay other than food,roof,lynching,shooting,cutting,burning!!! #AZTLANNATION

Puro 956 papa!

Thanks so much!

This comment is actually really underrated

Masaman Hey u replied, thank u 👊

LMAOOOOO

I approve of this comment

Lmao

Educated reply.

You chihuahua

Reactionary comment that makes things worse

You're probably White-Hispanic.

vogelszijnlelijk Not yet... We need to have a video on an independent Amerindian nation...

Martian American?

Jethro Piano An independent Native American country in America. Now that would truly be a sight to behold.

We already have that, it's called the US before 1960

Masaman I know that there used to be independent Amerindian countries (or civilisations) pre-Columbus era. An actual independent country today will be cool, and the kind of closest thing resembling this scenario is probably Bolivia with its predominately Amerindian population...

Thanks! I'm a huge fan of the numbers, but I thought people might not find that as interesting.

Masaman but it is interesting!

Technically... yes... but "Latino" is just such a convoluted and abstract term that it really makes no sense. Surely a French Canadian from Quebec has much more in common with Anglo Canadians or even Anglo Americans than someone from Argentina or Brazil. Personally, I like to define Latin America as everywhere South of the US including the Guyanas and the Caribbean (although they aren't Spanish-speaking) as it's just more convenient and makes much more sense.

Here in Chile the term Latin America is mostly used to the Spanish, Portuguese and French speaking countries of the Americas and the Caribbean. So countries like Belize and Jamaica are not considered latin American countries here :p but term it's not used for ethnic groups, just for people from a certain countries. If some place like Quebèc becomes independent here it would be considered from Latin America. And I think that is the most correct way to use the term because someone from Guyana or Curazao has almost nothing to do with being latino

Masaman Brazil doesn't speak Spanish. Latino/ Latin American means American countries that speak a latin language so Brazil, Haiti, and other French speaking countries. Latin/o isn't the Spanish speaking club. Spanish isn't the new Latin. It's a produce OF Latin as you know.

Chief Wanga oh, I forgot that. But the people who speak spanish often don't understand english there. Idk how it is for the people who speak the creole language that also make a large percentage of the population

BushShamanOculus yes

Thanks Funny Tv! I've dabbled with the idea of looking into the genetic history of each region of the planet, but it would be a truly massive project.

yeah, what does that do for non- Mestizo Hispanics?

they can choose either white, black, asian, native american, or multiple ones if they're mixed . :)

diego suarez choose the white, black, Asian, native, or more than one race category

Jizldiedizl B well that's stupid.

Reality is that unless you do a DNA test, you're not going to know if if you're 50/50 or anything specific. Mestizo just means mix. I'm Hispanic, and likely Mestizo (if you want to get specific) but I have no idea what % I am, but presume I'm more Euro than native as I'm a white Hispanic. Maybe one day I'll get around to doing the DNA test since I'm curious.

Not true Ricky. Americans aren't as simple as you Europeans want to think we are.

I havnt mention anything about anyone being simple.....?

Mexico should allow the US to occupy it and fight off the cartels

@@siyacer No amerimutt occupication is worse than cartels

@@reconscout2238 L take

Homogeneity is one of the best ways to create a stable, unified, peaceful country. IQ also varies between ethnicity, as well as shared history, culture, language, and other biological factors like bone structure.

Anthony Suarez oh wow thats impressive that you can trace it that far back! Are you a Hispano from the northern New Mexico/southern Colorado region?

Im french canadian and jamaican actually but i speak spanish and love demography

So ??

Anthony Suarez shit I’m proud of my spanish ancestry I’m a descendant of the army of Juan de Oñate in New Mexico

@@eliseomartinez7911 you're Mexican say that shit. why are you scare to represent

Very true! Spanish speaking countries. However, it is a mess with Mexico and Central America.

Desert Rose Western Sahara still speaks some Spanish

Es España no hispaña animal

@@Alejandrohyuga Verdad, pero Hispaña es antigua y España, Nueva.

@@manuelsanchezdeinigo3959 la antigua era Hispania "tierra donde abundan los conejos" nombre dado por los romanos

Soon. You've been very patient my friend.

Masaman yes I have been asking for a long time my dear friend thanks for doing my request =)

Masaman I just hope you wont make any mistakes since it is a very sensitive topic amongst us Turks. Speaking of Turks from western Turkey, majority descends from Balkan Turks, Albanians and Bosniaks that fled or migrated to western Turkey. The Turks came from primarily Bulgarians and Macedonians, so we look European because of Albanians and Slavs, not Greeks. Also, the Greeks in Anatolia weren't ethnically Greek to begin with, they were native Anatolians like Lycaonians, Pisidians etc. that adopted the Greek identity and language after their conversion to Christianity.

Masaman I also want to say that genetic studies show all Turks have Turkic admixture, although the amount is low. Some people misread genetic studies and think it says only 10-15% of Turks are "real" Turks. It says all Turks have 10-15% Turkic blood. I scored 4% with a DNA test btw.

Balkan Turk Interresting , what was your highest percentage?

Yeah it's not Québec at all

Yeah, if the US, China and Russia fell the world would be a far better place

Gustav Babic also if the US hadn't killed all native americans probably martians would had done it. for fucks sake how stupid are you

juan camaney 😂

Greg Calleja Butgfhrn I ain't TAken a CaliFornia U R NoT we WiLL not l0Se holly wood Or LA Or NASA JUst TaKe Arizona

That's literally Mexico's only invention.lol

Er...no, that was John Logie Baird in 1928. British. He also invented television itself in 1926, 3DTV in 1940, the first fully electronic colour TV in 1944, and high definition TV (1000 lines) in 1943. So no, a mexican did not invent colour TV, that's a lie so mexicans can feel proud about something.

not really.. Birth control pill, Automatic riffle, Jet Pack, Google, Mouse Pad, the O zero, Corn, Chocolate, and many others @@Ccreyescr

xiongmu1 exactly I don’t understand why some people have a tough time seeing these things

Check out the After the End Mod, it's CK2 in post apocalyptic medieval North and Central America.

Maththew ---- It would be totally boring. Race relations in this nation aren't nearly as bad as some influential people want them to be.

yep. glad you understand that and admit it at least lol

Yes! Very true! Just because the term "hispanic American" gets thrown out there, it does not mean Hispanics share the same culture. That is like if religions united: Ex. Jews and Islamic people uniting! Seriously!

Of course. Hispanic Americans are Latinos, but they do not belong to us, Latinos outside USA. We have the authentic culture, not the mishmash of Americanised Latinos that you have. They can't be right with us, just with their kind

Matthew Martinez anglo saxon americans hate your ass dumb fuck they would throw you under the bus if it was up to them

20 years México

Thanks!

Thanks. Always nice to see not everyone in the comments is an ass 😆

U forgot the weed & cocaine too

dear anglo-saxons your internet and penicillin are awesome

@@sierra5713 Which is sold in the US😉

In 1824 Mexico’s authoritarian ruler Agustín de Iturbide enacted a colonization law authorizing the Mexican federal government to allow legal immigration into Texas. This statute allowed foreigners to gain title to land. Mexican liberals argued in favor of allowing foreigners to immigrate. This would satisfy multiple objectives, including promoting economic growth, increasing the number of males available to defend the country, and bringing new capital and skills into the country to replace those lost when many Spaniards were expelled or chose to leave the country. The process for gaining an official land title was expensive and time-consuming, and many residents chose not to have the land surveyed or complete the application process. The Mexican law required immigrants to practice Catholicism and stressed that foreigners needed to learn Spanish and all people wishing to live in Texas were expected to report to the nearest Mexican authority for permission to settle. Many Americans immigrated to Mexico, where land was cheaper. A few Americans who had become naturalized Mexicans settled in Texas during that time. Most of the immigrants came from the southern United States. Immigration of United States had begun to accelerate rapidly. The new population was not fully assimilated and by 1826, approximately 3,000 Americans from the United States were living illegally in Texas. Most of the immigrants came from the southern United States. Many were slave owners, and most brought with them significant prejudices against other races, attitudes often applied to the Tejanos. Most Anglo Americans tried to isolate themselves from Mexicans. By 1830, Texas had a population of 7,000 foreign-born residents, with only 3,000 Mexican nationals. In regard to slavery, influential settler Stephen F. Austin, who reasoned that the success of his colonies needed slave labor and the economics it produced to lure more whites to the area. Anglos from the United States soon vastly outnumbered the Tejanos. Mexican authorities became increasingly concerned about the stability of the region.The colonies teetered at the brink of revolt in 1829, after Mexico abolished slavery. In response, President Anastasio Bustamante implemented the Laws of April 6, 1830, which, among other things, prohibited further immigration to Texas from the United States, increased taxes, and reiterated the ban on slavery. The law explicitly banned any further immigration from the United States to Texas and any new slaves. The new Law rescinded all empresario contracts that had not been completed and prohibited Americans from settling in any Mexican territory adjacent to the United States. Secretary of State Lucas Alamán, who wrote the 1830 law, said that "Texas will be lost for this Republic if adequate measures to save it are not taken. Law of April 6, 1830 under President Anastasio Bustamante was issued because the Mexican state of Texas was in danger of being annexed by the United States. New issued settlement contracts were brought under federal rather than state control. Provisions of the law were designed to encourage Mexican citizens to move from the interior to Texas. Mexicans who agreed to relocate to Texas would get good land, free transportation to Texas, and some financial assistance. Convicts would be sent to Texas to build fortifications and roads to stimulate trade. The lack of a formal policy had not stopped many immigrants. Settlers simply circumvented or ignored the laws. A number of people had left the United States to settle in the Mexican northern provinces.The ban and other measures did not stop US citizens from migrating to Texas by the thousands, and by 1834, it was estimated that over 30,000 Anglos lived in Texas, compared to only 7,800 Mexican-born residents. Mexican authorities noted that slave reforms passed by the state were being ignored. By the end of 1835, almost 5,000 enslaved Africans and African Americans lived in Texas, making up 13 percent of the non-Indian population (The Mexican rules were widely disregarded and slavery remained in Texas until the end of the American Civil War).The attitudes of the immigrants prompted the Mexican-American War on February 2nd 1848, in which Mexico lost almost 55 percent of its territory to the United States drawing a bullshit line trough territory that used to be nothing but Mexico and some of these territories we know currently as Arizona,NewMexico,Texas,Nevada and of course California. All of those states used to be absolutely Mexico! so now you have people who are indigenous here who were made foreigners on there own land. Mexicans form part of the U.S. history. We have the right to be in this land. America is not a country it's a continent. I don't know what's more criminal; crossing over a borderline of a country looking for the economic opportunity that allows you to work and earn or... going to another land across an ocean, taking over land killing &pushing its native people into concentrated areas, creating a trail of tears, deceiving other people of their true intentions and really trying to collect all these peoples gold to take it to their royal families killing"civilizing" them as they settle &conquer, or also bringing along a group of people who they used to perform hard labor of fields with no pay other than food,roof,lynching,shooting,cutting,burning!!!

1. the economy was screwed up, because American politicians. 2. it sucks, because it's full of them.