What If NATO And Russia Went To War?

Рет қаралды 2,813

2 ай бұрын

Russia takes a fat L
#map #history #world #geography #mapping #maps #viral #trending #russia #nato #usa #uk #countries #country #funny #funnyvideo #comedy #politics #putin

Пікірлер: 149

@terjeoseberg990 2 ай бұрын

Russia can’t even defeat Ukraine.

@ace.of.skulls 2 ай бұрын

Let’s look at this realistically shall we, if Russia is currently struggling against Ukraine (which btw is being supplied with NATO equipment) what makes anyone think Russia has a chance against NATO itself?

@UnitedKingdomPlays 2 ай бұрын

I honesty don't know.

@f1aziz 2 ай бұрын

Pre Feb 2022 Ukrainian armed forces would have whooped any NATO nation, except the US and Turkiye, from post to poll. NATO as a military force really doesn't keep the Russians awake at night, it's the political objectives of NATO that pisses them off.

@Jonathan-eo2sf 2 ай бұрын

I mean, if Russia will be frontaly atacked, China will probably suply them 3x as much as now, and in the moment Russia is not yousing its full potential on Ukraine. When a full blown war will be started with all of Nato, than there wont be 20 countries supporting just one frontline in Ukraine.

@Miro.A.Mursu- 2 ай бұрын

Military tactician here! I would love to see more tries of encirclement! In example: Russia takes part of Poland, Slovakia, Hungary and Romania so that the Nato troops in Ukraine would be encircled and would have lower amount of recources! Also dont get too involved with the Russian propaganda here in the comments and A GREAT video❤

@UnitedKingdomPlays 2 ай бұрын

I feel that It was immature of me to continue the arguments with them, So I think I'm slightly at fault as well. Thank you for the support!

@stargazer-elite 2 ай бұрын

@@UnitedKingdomPlays it’s not immature to argue with them. It’s perfectly normal that’s what they want honestly I have gotten into plenty of arguments with them because they’re good at building up rage lol I try my best to ignore and if it’s very clear misinformation just report

@FranceMappingandGames 2 ай бұрын

At around 11 minutes you do say the caucusas are underdefended, although I do beleive (unless being blown up by Turkey) that the oild fields there would be heavily defended.

@Superclip2543 2 ай бұрын

Love the video 👍🏽 your voice is always fine ☺️

@user-pn5ui9ov9r 2 ай бұрын

keep up the work as always

@stargazer-elite 2 ай бұрын

6:56 I don’t know if Poland would get slapped around that much. They have upped their military spending a lot, and in the most recent charts they’ve even spent more on NATO than the US that’s the reason they have recently been being referred to as “the European Texas” lol

@tomcurry556 2 ай бұрын

The usa be more than ready for winter combat. Remember this is not the second world war here. Russia hurt germany so bad simply because hitler had no clue about the cold. Thats not there now

@RossoTX815 2 ай бұрын

honestly hope this dosent happen cuz ppl everywhere will be fucked (drafts everywhere)

@stargazer-elite 2 ай бұрын

Yeah

@tomcurry556 2 ай бұрын

Were allready fucked!

@halilaydn4575 2 ай бұрын

Even Putin says Russia can't win war against NATO. But he says no one win that war (nuclear apocalypse) and i think he is right

@UnitedKingdomPlays 2 ай бұрын

Yes, If it's nuclear was then nobodies winning. But if It's conventional warfare NATO's winning.

@halilaydn4575 2 ай бұрын

@@UnitedKingdomPlays Of course, but in a scenario where the war reaches the level of an invasion of Russia, it is almost certain that nuclear weapons will be used.

@stargazer-elite 2 ай бұрын

11:47 ah yes, classic American straight line borders 😂

@user-fk6zq1qj3c 2 ай бұрын

also kaleningrad would be given to germany since many past history and i know for sure this is a fact but why am i to judge this is alternate history good work.😊

@stargazer-elite 2 ай бұрын

Unfortunately, for Germany, there are no Germans there anymore so it’s unsure if they would even want it. It’s likely that it would go to Poland because a lot of former Prussian land became part of Poland. It would only make sense for Kaliningrad too plus during the Soviet Union times or close to the collapse I forgot Russia did offer it to Lithuania, but they said no because there was too many Russians there

@Eggtastic 2 ай бұрын

uh oh...

@KaijuGameplayTv6592 2 ай бұрын

w vid as always

@lordnotriel9616 2 ай бұрын

I thought it was Denmark on the thumbnail's left for a sec lmao

@NiskaMagnusson 2 ай бұрын

the whole thing about Belarus joining NATO at the start is rubbish I must say, since the anti government protests the Lukashenko regime has had to let great swathes of Russian troops into their country to keep them afloat, which has pushed them further into being a sattelite of the Russians. Why on earth would they join NATO? that'd be suicide. There IS a small anti-government militia of native Belarussians based in Poland, but other than that ....

@UnitedKingdomPlays 2 ай бұрын

Yeah I was confused on Belarus. Staying Neutral or joining Russia would probably be there go to.

@stargazer-elite 2 ай бұрын

By Belarus, joining the war in general, it’s suicide for Lukashenko Russia would have to move its own troops in to prevent unrest. Belarus is a boiling pot waiting to burst and Lukashenko knows this there was even talks about him joining the war against Ukraine around a year ago but although he never publicly said it, it was very clear he didn’t want to go to war with Ukraine because of this reason that’s why he just let Russian troops through

@user-fk6zq1qj3c 2 ай бұрын

vlad-i-vas-stock is how you pronounce that city

@stargazer-elite 2 ай бұрын

2:41 Ukraine never had a proper Navy. That’s why there’s so many jokes about about Russia losing its navy to a country that doesn’t even have one lol.

@freddiemedley5580 2 ай бұрын

Shouldn't Australia and NZ be in the war due to the five eyes alliance?

@UnitedKingdomPlays 2 ай бұрын

The Five Eyes Alliance isn't a military alliance, if it was then it still wouldn't have been activated because Romania was the country that got attacked first.

@stargazer-elite 2 ай бұрын

The US does have military alliances with Australia and New Zealand in a similar aspect to NATO and also other military alliances like NATO, such as the real packed and ones for Japan, South Korea, the Philippines and Thailand respectively, but the only way all of those alliances went activate at the same time is if the US itself was attacked

@UnitedKingdomPlays 2 ай бұрын

Discord: discord.gg/jVddYt53Rx

@dogninjaYT 2 ай бұрын

average adizz pro video be like

@big.atom37 2 ай бұрын

US attacking Russia... from the East and "conquering" half of Kamchatka regjon no less. Words just can't describe... *facepalm* It's enough youtube for me for today.

@UnitedKingdomPlays 2 ай бұрын

Why wouldn't the U.S occupy major eastern Russian cities and make Russia have to split up there forces? It's not the worst idea forcing Russia into fighting on two fronts.

@big.atom37 2 ай бұрын

@@UnitedKingdomPlaysI don't even know where to begin. Such an invasion would require tremendous military and logistical preparations. You'd need to find and destroy the entire Russian submarine fleet and all the vehicles with anti-ship missiles which Russia has plenty since even one of those can sink a large portion of your invading forces. It also makes no sense from a military standpoint since occupying Russian Far East won't help you defeat Russia but will make you dedicate a significant chunk of your forces just for that task alone. It would also be impossible to control the region since there is lot of land with hills and mountains but not so many roads and the locals would oppose hard. Even a few dozen partisans can bog down thousands of troops in such conditions. It'd be Afghanistan 2.0 only this time instead of guys in bath robes and slippers who don't know how to hold an assault rifle you'd be faced with well trained special forces. There are dozens of other reasons why invading Russia from the East is an extremely stupid idea but I have neither time nor will to elaborate on those.

@UnitedKingdomPlays 2 ай бұрын

So occupying major Russian cities in the East and forcing Russia into a two front war isn't a good idea? I never said the U.S would occupy all of Eastern Russia, that would be to huge of a frontline to hold up in the first place. Maybe Occupying Sakhalin, Vladivostok, Magadan or any other city with a considerable population in that area, Occupying or destroying ports would be a big deal. And the U.S would 100% eventually break the Russian navy is the pacific. But apparently since this isn't worth your time I guess it doesn't matter.

@big.atom37 2 ай бұрын

@@UnitedKingdomPlaysYou'd be taking away forces from the European theater for this invasion. War with Russia in Europe would require active participation of the American military. Without the US majority of European armies incapable of waging a full-scale war. They are neither equipped nor trained for this kind of warfare. Even AFU in its current form can steamroll a lot of them. So every brigade you dedicate for such an invasion is the brigade that's not helping you where it matters. Moreover, not only Russia would require significantly less forces to defend but with current technologies naval invasions are extremely hard to execute. They would most likely result in a large number of causalities and sunk vessels. So you'd have to prepare 4-5 times more troops than the defenders, a large fleet and all the logistics behind it. You should also take into account that China and North Korea would certainly get involved as well since they won't just allow a hostile force to appear near their borders. So is it doable? Yes. Is it extremely stupid? Also yes.

@santielballer 2 ай бұрын

cool.

@jamieswithenbank1813 2 ай бұрын

This ignores several things: 1) Ammunition (NATO is already running out) - you need bullets to fight. 2) Russia has a treaty with China that says that if NATO declares war on Russia, then China is also in. 3) This also ignores other opportunistic nations that might take advantage of a busy NATO to solve their regional disagreements. All in all, if this happens then all hell breaks loose, and NATO doesn't have ammunition to put in their weapons to fight. - It also ignores the fact that Russian law requires the use of nuclear weapons if their territorial integrity is threatened - so if NATO captures territory that Russia considers Russian, then nuclear holocaust follows.

@UnitedKingdomPlays 2 ай бұрын

I hope you do realize NATO can simply make more Ammunition, they aren't exactly broke. This deal with China your talking about wouldn't even come into action either. Russia attacked Romania and killed over 1000 of there citizens which caused Romania to Evoke article 5. I said that in the video. NATO didn't flat out declare war for no reason. Russia was the aggressor. I also said at the very start of the video that Nukes wouldn't be used.

@ImperatorAugustus 2 ай бұрын

This should exclude the possibility of China entering the war and a full scale nuclear war because it would make the whole scenario pointless by that point. And do Russians STILL believe that they can take on NATO? If so, that’s pretty sad. They haven’t learned anything did they?

@user-vf2xq1iz6h 2 ай бұрын

@@UnitedKingdomPlaysbro just said that Russia will be aggressor befouled he wants it☠️☠️☠️

@UnitedKingdomPlays 2 ай бұрын

@@user-vf2xq1iz6h Bro what are you yapping about, Russia is going to be the aggressor because that makes the most sense. Russia Accidentally attacking a NATO country is more likely then NATO flat out declaring war for no reason.

@dannydanny2789 2 ай бұрын

@@UnitedKingdomPlaysmaking it takes time and you soyboys aren't exactly made for 18 hour shifts in an ammunition factory

@ismelllikesocksbro 2 ай бұрын

Good vid as usual !!❤😊

@aacvieira 2 ай бұрын

Sum bricks, and the rest, and you sum 86% of world population. After all, only Russia outperform west munitions industry, imagine China, India, South Africa, Brazil 😂😂😂😂😂

@impedireg 2 ай бұрын

kazasthan is a russian ally

@stargazer-elite 2 ай бұрын

The CSTO members (Russian NATO) have many disagreements, and just because Kazakhstan is a military ally of Russia doesn’t mean they would help. In fact, Kazakhstan even helped partake in sanctions against Russia around a year ago.

@stargazer-elite 2 ай бұрын

Epic video Average Russian L

@FranceMappingandGames 2 ай бұрын

Most of Russia's Black Sea navy was obliterated by Ukrainian hyper Speed misles produced by Elon Musk.

@chinedumekpemiro59 2 ай бұрын

I confess I was fake UK from discord server

@Vortex3d_frfr 2 ай бұрын

😱😱😱😱😱😱😱

@Vortex3d_frfr 2 ай бұрын

how cold you

@Idkwhattouseasmyhandle 2 ай бұрын

winter trained Siberian soilders: am I a joke to you

@UnitedKingdomPlays 2 ай бұрын

At 9:53 I mention Siberian Troops that pushed back the NATO forced majorly. I don't know if you watched that far though.

@Denis_Valeev. 2 ай бұрын

Ты забыл, что у многих стран мира есть счёты с НАТО. Так что если Россия вступит в войну, то её примеру последуют Сербия, Иран, Ирак, КНДР и, скорее всего, Китай (вряд ли все эти страны останутся в стороне, когда решается судьба мира). + России нет никакого смысла вести наступление на Польшу, т.к. на границе с Польшой у Беларуси есть прочная система укреплений. Так что данный сценарий очень далёк от реальности

@UnitedKingdomPlays 2 ай бұрын

Я очень сомневаюсь, что кто-либо из тех союзников, которых вы перечислили, присоединится. Если бы Россия не была первой, кто напал на НАТО, возможно, они бы присоединились. В видео я заявил, что российская ракета убила более тысячи румынских граждан, и именно поэтому началась война. Защита белорусско-польской границы могла быть правдой, я не смог найти никакой информации по этому поводу.

@Denis_Valeev. 2 ай бұрын

@@UnitedKingdomPlaysПохоже я немного пропустил вступление. Ну в любом случае России в реальности не за чем просто так убивать 1000 румын, но если вы делали этот сценарий, не основываясь на реальную ситуацию, то винить вас не могу. Хоть я и не согласен с некоторыми вашими высказываниями, я понимаю, что над этим видео проделана немалая работа, поэтому пожелаю вам удачи в дальнейшем продвижении канала!

@ThatBalkanGuy. 2 ай бұрын

Wtf😂 🤦🏻 Do you even know how much troops NATO can send over in Russia?France for example can send only couple of thousands of troops,according to themselves. Russia has the industry to produce 300 tanks and 250k shells a year, the West can't produce such numbers and to build their own industry for such production it will take them at least 10 years. France for example produces only 20k shells a year and the United States is already running out of shells because of Ukraine. I saw you comment that if the West wanted to, they can produce such numbers, which just isnt true,they dont have the industry and if they had it, they would have send Ukraine much more ammunition and tanks😂 And without the logistics of sending large number of troops in Russia or having manufacturing capabilites for producing shells that could last them at least a year, how would they win this war, when wars are all about the logistics and who would last longer? Such a war would last years and the West doesnt have the logistics or ammunitions to sustain such a large scale war for years. Except if you believe in a quick blitzkrieg😂 Russia also has couple of times the artillery the West has and this alone has been said to win the wars troughout history and has caused 75% of the casualties in Ukraine. The only thing the West has advantage over Russia is in the skies and seas, but having advantage over the seas won't do much and Russia also has the best anti-air capabilities that will neglect to a large part the air superiority of the West. And as a guy who lives in a NATO country I can tell you NATO, except the US and Turkey, doesnt really have great war capabilities. France has been beaten by Wagner in Africa and the other NATO states can't really operate independently in a war + they dont have enough experience. So overall NATO cannot send all of its millions of troops against Russia, they dont have the capabilities for that, as I already told you France can send 7-15k soldiers abroad, with the biggest force they have ever send in a single battle being 5k. So Russia will have numerical advantage in terms of boots on the ground,tanks,artillery pieces and anti-air vechicles + hundreds of thousands of soldiers with experience from an actual attrition war against a modern army. Plus they also have larger production capabilities than the West + they can afford to lose more people to achieve victory, history has proven that. And we dont even count that China can supply Russia with ammunitions and weapons too,they have even bigger manufacturing capabilities than thr Russian industry ,as well as Iran or North Korea. We saw that the Western sanctions did worse to the West than to Russia, but in such a scenario China will sanction the West too,what will happen then? We also have the very real possibilities that many countries woudn't want to fight Russia and will be out of it. So war is a complicated thing and you make it appear more simple than a video game. I saw you in one of your comments saying that there are russian bots disagreeing with you and you are tired of explaining them why you are right😂. Thats just called having a different opinion,Im not a russian,Im just not a Westaboo. Research more.

@UnitedKingdomPlays 2 ай бұрын

So hopefully we can agree that NATO's winning in the long run, thanks to the USA and also the fact that Russia's equipment is outdated, there generals are garbage, and they struggle to supply themselves in just Ukraine. I never called them Russian bots, but I was tired with arguing with them.

@ThatBalkanGuy. 2 ай бұрын

Did you just describe NATO? How does what you just said have anything to do with what I wrote? Read it again,I just added couple of things before seeing you already replied. @@UnitedKingdomPlays

@UnitedKingdomPlays 2 ай бұрын

@@ThatBalkanGuy. Seems to me like you were describing Russia's capabilities and NATO's. I thought those statements about Russia's capabilities were suggesting that they would win in the Video.

@ThatBalkanGuy. 2 ай бұрын

@@UnitedKingdomPlays yes Russia will win,the West has all the problems I described.

@UnitedKingdomPlays 2 ай бұрын

@@ThatBalkanGuy. What about Russia's problems as well? Or there performance in Ukraine right now? Or the problems they'd face in the long term? I ain't trying to ask this rudely I'm asking it as a genuine question because you seem to be a lot more educated on it then me.