yeah i think so too

Russia managing to fight a 3 front war when they can barely keep up with an under supplied Ukraine isn’t going to end well for them. If Russia had nukes they would win, If they don’t then it’s a stalemate or a blue team victory.

@UnitedKingdomPlays Ukraine is by no means undersupplied, recently their aid has gone down and Russia has been making some good gains. But Ukraines economy and lack of manpower is a big factor

@@that1countrieschannel According to articles NATO themselves is struggling to give Ukraine the amount of Ammo they need. Ukraine also went into there spring offensive undersupplied. Russia right now isn't set to a full on win anytime soon, it's even been considered that in 2025 Ukraine could beat Russia's invasion. Russia hasn't made any Good land gains, they have barley made any.

Ukraine managed to defend off the Russians for like a week or two without NATO aid sure the Russians made significantly more gains than they do nowadays, but the fact that Ukraine could do that all on its own is very impressive And as UKplays themself said Russia would likely not do well on multiple fronts this is 3 separate fronts the western Kaliningrad front, The eastern front and the southern front Even without Western aid, Russia is likely to lose a lot of men, supplies, etc. I do not see a way they could win, but I also don’t see a way that the blue team could win either.

Second

Israel during Yom Kippur War: Hold my beer

Exactly. Which is why all of these videos that that show a war with Russia without nuclear weapons just unreasonable and irrational

Wikipedia or just google images

The scenario was just suppose to be between the Post Soviet countries and Russia, if it wasn't then all of those things you just said would happen.

I think I a stalemates more likely then a Russian victory. But if Russia dragged on the war long enough they could probably win, but that would be assuming there population didn't overthrow them, all of there factories stayed in good condition, and there Airforce performed Insanely well.

That is if the leaders of the rebels trying to overthrow putin wouldn't have their minds suddenly changed (metaphorically or not), but hey, good ol' honest putin wouldn't do any heinous crimes against these leaders, right?

@@UnitedKingdomPlays That is if the leaders of the rebels wouldn't have their minds suddenly changed (metaphorically or not). Nevertheless, the rebel militia's quality of weapons are going to be far less than of the Russian Army, not to mention Wagner's in which Putin is pouring a significant portion of his wealth in our timeline, we would expect Putin to invest more to Wagner in this scenario The air force are not going to have any problems, since the blue team is not receiving western aid and NATO-grade Aircrafts, the far superior and numerical Russian Air Force is going to have a breeze.

Yeah tell us

Paint. Net

@@UnitedKingdomPlaysgive tutorial

@@rupindersinghc At 10k subs I will

@@rupindersinghc get a world map with borders and color them, simple as that

Yes, we mispronounce things here. On accident of course 💀

@@UnitedKingdomPlays haha don't worry

No, they keep any Weapons or Technology they had before.

Chances are actually pretty high.

@@UnitedKingdomPlays They have a major Russian population. Also, only Ukraine has decent military out of all of them. Central Asia would be nothing if they didn't have Russian and Chinese help. This scenario is pretty unrealistic. Sure, it would take Russia 7 years or more to conquer all of these states, but there is no chance that Russia can lose, the best other states can do is a stalemate. Of course, all that changes if NATO steps in, Russia wouldn't last a year.

@@Randomguy7261 Those Russian populations don't want to be apart of Russia, at least the one in Ukraine didn't. Kazakhstan still has a standing army of over 300,000 and can mobilize more if needed. Russia is also fighting a 3 front war, and they are struggling to just defeat Ukraine right now. China has also given Russia a lot of things. A stalemate is more likely then a Russian victory.

@@UnitedKingdomPlays Russia's struggle in Ukraine is connected to the stupidity of the Russian military officials. I would say they are the worst in the world. They are using non-trained units and soviet equipment in Ukraine rather than professional soldiers and modern equipment because it's "too expensive to repair them". I agree that stalemate is more likely, but it's a question if Russia would use their modern equipment or still be scared to use it. Kazahstan's military relies on Russia's military for training. China hasn't given anything to Russia, but has kept the growth of the Russian economy. If NATO won't continue to give supplies and equipment to Ukraine, Russian victory is likely, but if they do, a stalemate is almost guaranteed. (of course if Russia gets better generals, if they keep the current ones we can expect the fall of Moscow in a day).

​@@Randomguy7261 China gave Russia Treasury also designates 7. Chinese entities for shipments to Russia that support its war efforts in Ukraine such as providing high-resolution observation satellite imagery, advanced electronics, electronic components, and technological equipment and machine tools. I can't deny that Russia's military generals are garbage. I doubt Russia's getting better generals anytime soon, but I agree with you. If Russia continues to perform like this then they will most likely lose. If NATO doesn't supply then you're probably right, 7-10 years and Russia could maybe win.

I joined but i forgot my password so i cant chat

Russia needs competent generals. Putin needs loyal generals especially after the prigozhin accident

@@randomriku6774 fr

Nah ain't no way you're here bro 💀

Russia almost had a coup a few months ago.

😂 delusional

Yeah im sure about that.

bruh the bloods and crips the hells angels and we have the largest locked up population listen and Americans don't do that crazy stuff like Russia

I wouldn’t say easily but ye maybe

@@harlaneric7963no support from america, Russia would win easily