I mean it is actually

yaeh what ever

is an*

Yeah it is only about art

Not really

Exacly the same for me lol🙃

No I'm not.

@@ianmusic911 Yes you are

You're art too..😊

Ulises Castillo it’s a metaphor.

@Ulises Castillo CHILL DOWN BRO YOU DONT HAVE TO BE MEAN AND DONT CALL HIM STUPID YOU ARE

I used to be a science student too but I recently dropped out because I m more fond into arts and science was just a backup plan that didn't really work out. So, I m finally feeling free and confident enough in my decision to study arts though I lost my year but Ik it's all gonna be worth it cause I m doing what interests me : ) wish me a luck.

Science is also "ART"

yep lmao

yep

me for my school

For school.🏃🏼💨

School

Wonderful!

Nice very articulate

Cool.

lol true

Actually it's just us

ok my middle school art teacher

not always

someone can make a film about murder but not be a murderer, art is anything that is an expression of our creative mind

@@alexivy8732 Wise Words

@Nired Kik true however its not always that, art isnt always about who we are, sometimes its about what we think, what we dream, and those things arent really related to who we are, depending on what type of thought it is

Is any work of art, worth millions of dollars? Why or why not?

Wonderful!

❤

You got it for school tooooo!!!!!

Me three

Nope me too

Me too

Me too

and I feel amazed by things that are'nt "typical luxery" like a anime drawing, animations, realistic drawings, music, making something with skills and soul

Same. Like art means so much more than just visually pleasing. I've always hated sharing my art because some people stated that abstract art isn't art. Like I wouldn't care if they hated it or called it trash, but people calling it not an art seriously hurt.

If anything that stirs emotionis art, is a bad fanfiction with Mary Sues etc art when a 12 year old reads it and feels something?

​@@randomish4285you are on point. 👍🏻👍🏻

Awesome! Thank you!

Love that!

Art is the highest of that what you decided to do. Its when you master some technique nearly to perfection. You made your own style, your principle of working ... Until you reach this point, you are only practicioner, an amteur in the field of art. Modern people think everything is art, ha ha. I find that really funny. This is how i describe it. I would be happy to hear your opinion on this subject.

@@alekjovanovski3087 My definition - and this is just my personal philosophy that I developed on my own with no formal education on the matter, so I don't pretend to be an authority here - is that artistry is "the process of refining a certain set of values particular to the artist", and art is the practical expression of that process. This is not exactly the same thing as simply mastering a given creative discipline. It's more about pursuing a personal ideal via that discipline. (The two do, however, tend to develop together in a sort of symbiotic relationship.) As an example, say a carpenter learns how to make a chair. Once he has perfected the skills to make a certain model of chair, he may apply this to other chair designs, and so on, until he can expertly craft a large number of different chairs. At this point he is extremely skilled at chair making, but that's still just craftsmanship; something you could learn just by following instructions or program a robot to do for you. It becomes art once our carpenter starts to consider how he thinks and feels about chairs - what chairs mean to him and what aspects of them he finds particularly important, pleasing or stimulating - and then tries to make chairs that embody those values as closely as possible. Now just replace chairs with music or paintings or narratives. That's my take on it, anyway. I hope it makes at least a bit of sense.

@@RelativelyBest I think that you are more close to explaining the complexity behind art. even tho i study art. But the pursuit for art is subjective, it does not matter how one wants to learn about it (formal or not). I''m just happy when some one awake himself and start asking the question you mentioned. Good example.

@@alekjovanovski3087 Do you have any idea of a good assay about art? I would be very interested in reading one that is quite complete and at the same time clear and direct.

alek jovanovski nice

🎵

I love art it is so fun and intresting

Then we should stop calling everything art, in order to preserve the effort and discipline that a person musters over years of practice (with or without education). I call an someone an artist when that person has tried to perfect a certain discipline of creativity and is able to 'positively' create inspiring/creative thoughts in others. They posses uniqueness and quality not found in others. People nowadays with bad intentions use this in the wrong way unfortunately. A stuffed dead chimpanzee with finger nail paint and lipstick is not art, but a expression of degeneracy. A mockery of true beauty that is within the human being. However, many modern day 'artists' and 'art lovers' still say it is art because of the story and meaning behind it. I still will refuse to share their worldview ideas about art and expression. A banana taped on a wall with duck tape is not art. It was said that the banana taped on the wall was an expression of rebellion against the absurdity of capitalism. Why then do we not call all activists 'artists'? Aren't Antifa and BLM with their many expression and appearances then also not a form of art? See, people do not seem to care about the title, but the dominance in gaining a position of influence and power gained by the word 'artist' and 'art'. A portion of modern day artists want to control, dominate, manipulate, influence our perceptions of reality. Post-modernist thoughts and Marxism is what we are actually experiencing. This activism and rebellion against the society and the system. Yes, the artist of old often expressed their disdain of powerful individuals or their governments, but they did not intent to negatively alter the perception of reality of the peoples. Modern day 'artists' more certainly inject their own wicked and often untrue perception of reality, which is highly off-putting and sometimes even dangerous. However many people fail to notice and see this. People prefer beauty over wickedness. A child doll sawn in half with a dog doll lower half placed into a position of creepiness is not art, but an expression of disturbance and horror. What is it with these almost wicked thoughts that some 'modern artists' have? They truly get angry when you refuse to call their work 'art'. I call it an expression of degeneracy, corruption and defilement of nature and beauty. This development has happened before with the worst consequences for 'artists' possible. Because a small group got their way in corrupting society that even people fled from those habitations. Art stops being art when it corrupts and defiles people and society in general. Corruption and defilement through so called 'art' got so bad in the past, that people chose to ban certain forms of 'art' for being too pervasive, defiling and corruptive (look what happened to Berlin during the Weimar Republic). Art is supposed to liberate, inspire, improve and challenge our creative being in a positive manner. Not leave us with a 'disdain', 'disgust'' or even 'distrust' of our current generation of 'modern artists'. Then your 'art' has failed and turned against you. Do you view a gun pointed at yourselves in this same context as 'art' if that means you could express yourself? Ask people: what do you prefer as art, old classical art or modern day art. A vast majority will still prefer old classical art. I fail to notice the arguments the modern day artists have concerning old classical art. Are they confronted by the fact that the vast majority does not posses such quality of spirit and meaning within themselves? Old classical art is timeless and priceless. In this is found the answer what people rather define as art does it not?. Modern day artists who create true art out of passion, love, creativity and are determined to practice for decades are declining. Often they make it in our time and are exceptionally gifted. Millions of people around the world just study 'art' for a minimum of four years and think they have become an artist. The very vast majority of them won't make it in the end. You cannot have dozens of millions of people calling themselves artists. The meaning of art will then surely decline and finally disappear. The soul, uniqueness and spirit of art are then meaningless. I often have had major discussion about 'art', what 'art' is and how we can define 'art'. Always I hear people say: you cannot define what are it and isn't. Yet I see nor sense the spirit in 'art' in many works made by modern day 'artists'. In our days, the word 'art' is being defiled by con-artists who prefer to shock or confuse audiences with a large tendency of ego, narcissism and arrogance. They create aberrations, not 'art'.

Thanks for the positive feedback!

Thanks and welcome

@@GCFLearnFree thanks for visiting

Pre-20th C. pictures acknowledge that geometric context with the frame. That is the point of the frame. Abstract paintings have no frame, again this acknowledges the geometric context. The ignorance of collectors and gallerists is typified in for example a Guston painting put up for auction with a thin frame tacked on afterwards with no relation at all to the work of art. The modest picture with a modest frame suggests a wish to merely enjoy that scene without the grand and heavy stuff.

Most welcome 😊

Raybe of course

Raybe yes!

Anything and everything is art if it makes you feel in a certain way the only thing that is not art, is if you don't feel anything towards something, to feel emotionless toward something.

a traffic jam, your cat, and a suspicious sound late at night could be inspiration. Perhaps the emotions inspired by these things could be embodied in an artwork. There are artists who create performances or experiences, perhaps the traffic jam could be art if done on purpose or filmed and edited in a way that conveys a message or evokes an emotion. I do agree with your previous replies that mention an artist developing skill and technique. I think this is an important part of the puzzle as well.

@@emenz910 I don't think you have to feel anything and it could still be art.

@@mycapson it says in the video that art can be different for everybody. Some can feel something through a specific art, while others dont.

Thank you so much 😀

Deidara: Thats my boy!

You are very welcome

Glad it was helpful!

@@GCFLearnFree ❤️

Glad you think so!

Glad you enjoyed it!