Thanks for your kind words. Updated version is here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/arZ6fshil9O5pqc.html Let me know whether other topics interest you. You might also find my website helpful: uslawessentials.com

+Ashfaquzzaman Chowdhury Thanks AC. If you stop by our Facebook page you can see an updated version. goo.gl/2qxEIy

Great explanation thanks!

Me!!!!

me

me\

me

Thanks for stopping by. If you are interested I have more material with videos on the US government and legal system on my website: uslawessentials.com/us-government-us-legal-system/constitution-distribution-power/ uslawessentials.com/us-government-us-legal-system/constitution-distribution-power/the-constitution-and-compromise/

sooo boring

+Savaliya Juhi shut up bitch

jigs Thanks!

There is an updated version of this video kzfaq.info/get/bejne/arZ6fshil9O5pqc.html You might like to visit the uslawessentials website, too uslawessentials.com

Thanks, updated version is here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/arZ6fshil9O5pqc.html You can also visit the uslawessentials website at uslawessentials.com

That's kind of you Max. There's an updated version of the video which I think is a bit more appealing stylistically: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/arZ6fshil9O5pqc.html. On my website there is additional information on the Consitution and federal and state court systems: goo.gl/lzqMQP ; goo.gl/5DtEPG My blog is here: uslawessentials.com/blog If there are other topics that interest you please let me know.

Max Taylor it really is

Eo Two?

+Eva De Leon Hi Eva, thank you. No explanation is perfect . . . But I appreciate your kind words. You might find the material I uploaded here helpful: uslawessentials.atavist.com/constitution-distribution-of-power

Cebby Thanks Cebby. I hope it's a helpful introduction and you can tackle your textbook easier now. uslawessentials.com/forum uslawessentials.com/blog

Madie Leigh Thanks Madie. I think I made a slightly updated version which should be on the channel somewhere. All the best to you. www.uslawessentials.com

+Cecilia Mata Thanks Cecilia. You can see a new version of the video on the USLawEssentials Facebook page goo.gl/2qxEIy

Hi, updated video is here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/arZ6fshil9O5pqc.html More here: uslawessentials.com

+Precious Johnson Thanks PJ. I hope it was a helpful introduction. You're welcome to stop by my website uslawessentials.com and my FB page. goo.gl/2qxEIy

Thanks! updated video is here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/arZ6fshil9O5pqc.html

Thanks. Updated version is here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/arZ6fshil9O5pqc.html

Updated version is here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/arZ6fshil9O5pqc.html More content is here: uslawessentials.com

Thanks, updated version is here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/arZ6fshil9O5pqc.html Let me know if other topics interest you. uslawessentials.com

Both. As with other issues facing the country as a whole and where there is a large-scale disaster, the federal government had the power to take the lead. The federal government could have coordinated a national response by disclosing the danger as opposed to denying its existence, helping to prepare the country with testing kits, ventilators, safely testing people entering the country, etc. The federal government did not fulfill its role in response to the pandemic and the result has been horrifying. States have the power to take important steps within each state such as closing schools and enforcing other rules to reduce the spread of the virus.

MNgocMinah No federal government means that the federal has a power where they have laws the counts equally for every states that unifies them that where you have the president congress etc But the state power is where the state has it’s own power which mean that each state is different between how they rule their state fx California state is not the same as you have en fx Florida state I hope you get the picture here

+Brandon Igiehon Thanks Brandon. I'll be updating my videos and adding new material so please check back. You can also see material on my website uslawessentials.com If there are topics that interest you let me know.

Thanks for watching. Updated video is here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/arZ6fshil9O5pqc.html

Thanks. Updated version is here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/arZ6fshil9O5pqc.html

Allrounder rahul q

+Grace Bravo Hi, I'm sorry, I don't have enough knowledge regarding the issue. I assume it's still an ongoing debate? What do you think?

+USLawEssentials Well I actually don't have any idea if ever that there will be a Federelism in the Philippines.but how about the Pres wanted to implement this kind of Federelism in our country does still need to bring to Congress or Senate before they implement this kind of Government? or the Pres can implement right away without the further talks.

+Grace Bravo Trust me, you know much more about this than I do. Perhaps it would be accomplished through changes to the Philippine Constitution or through legislative change? I'd be surprised if the Philippine president could do this on his own authority, but again, I'm just guessing. Sorry I'm not more help.

Tajinder Singh Good to hear, thanks!

Good to hear. Thanks. Let me know if there are other topics of interest to you.

USLawEssentials The best video, thank you so much.

+BRK Thanks BRK! I have a FB page now where you can can see an updated version. Please come by if you can ( goo.gl/2qxEIy) I'll post notices there about courses and online tutoring. Anyway, thanks for watching.

how can i find it?

Reed, thanks. This was an early video I worked on and tried to improve some of the sound and visuals here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nKxjeNmd2d2siZ8.html If you're researching federalism I hope this was a good start and thanks again for your kind comment.

KIM LORI Kim, 1. Thanks for your kind comment on the videos. 2. I cannot give you answers if this is for school because that would not be right. But I'm happy to help you think about your answers. By the way, I just started a message board on my website and you should feel free to register and post ideas and questions:(@forum) To answer your question you need to realize that the question requires you to identify two things to answer it correctly. First, of the four choices you listed, which were Madison's proposals with regard to the US national government? Second, which of these proposals was tied to protecting people's rights and the public good? Start thinking along those lines and let me know your thoughts.

My answer is 1- direct lawmaking by citizens, is correct ?? Thank you so much.

Hi Kim, 1. Unfortunately I can’t tell you whether your answer is right or wrong because that might be considered cheating. 2. But here is a way that you can determine the correct answer. You need two magic words: (i) Why and (ii) Because If you think answer number one is correct, ask yourself why you think that. Can you find a book or article written by a reputable historian which states that Madison supported direct lawmaking by citizens? Better yet, take a look at what Madison himself wrote in Federalist No.10. There is a good article on Federalist No. 10 in Wikipedia actually so you can start with that. By reading these resources you can determine what Madison thought of direct lawmaking.
 You will also be able to determine the correct answer to the question. 3. Here is something to think about as you do your reading. Let's say 100 people live in a small town. 90 people vote to do "X." Unfortunately, "X" is very bad and unfair to the other 10 people. Did Madison have any ideas on how to address this type of potential problem in the early days of our country?

Thank you Sir for your explanation.

+Ronda Jones Thanks Ronda.

Well, not sure if you are serious, but just in case, this version is a little faster: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/arZ6fshil9O5pqc.html The video provides the background, the key is helping students find examples of "federalism in action" in the United States, and comparing the examples to other countries that do not have a similar system.

That's actually a very good question. The federal government almost certainly does not have power under the Constitution to compel states to re-open. It does not have the power to do other things (such as immigration policies in response to the pandemic).The federal government also could have taken the lead in coordinating steps to combat the pandemic intelligently. It did not. For some of the reasons that led to this failure, please see this article: www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/06/underlying-conditions/610261/

@@USLawEssentials OMG thank you for your quick response. I will definitely be subscribing to your channel !!

Hi, not sure what exactly you mean by "good" but it was a successful compromise. I talk about it a bit here: uslawessentials.com/constitution-distribution-power-part-ii-constitution-compromise/

Your dumb

@@5ivefleezyy Says the guy who misspelled half the words of his response...