Yeah, also scary at the same time

Yes

​@@ramz1364 true

beautiful yet soo scary

No

Was steven wright but still funny

@donalddoescoke6454brother it’s a joke. Einstein did not say this and you are just trying to start a long argument where nobody comes out learning anything

no that is not true god is real

​​@DonaldDoesPepsi attention-seeking ass

​@DonaldDoesPepsi Just wait u will be haunted down by those ppl...they are coming for your soul......just wait...

Interstellar reference…

And the 4th dimension ofc

​@@Icey-boy325no

Love the reference my guy

Nice

💀

how can another black hole exist inside a black hole that's illogical

​@@tejusvjoshi9101possible

​​@@tejusvjoshi9101Who know i mean we don't even know why the space is dark in the first place what made it dark or colourless like it shoud also be possible for the space to be white instead of dark

@@mystery_slime571 sky is dark because there's no atmosphere

An AI would be no doubt.

He would die in it and the camera footage would get lost in it so no point

@@1ricefarmer184 you underestimate the curiosity and willingness to experience :)

​@1ricefarmer184 that joke went right over your head dude

satellites exist ???

Astronomy

He need his own channel in the tv show

@@Thesigmamail ma bad

@@hyperRyderR1 no cap

​@@Thesigmamailbro astronomy falls in science to do astronomy u need to master astrophysics which is in science

it doesn't have to be ANOTHER UNIVERSE but that's actually True like u would have to find a one again to get closer to your Galaxy😂 but it goes More far away💀💀 Maybe in future we could fix this maybe when we make them bending the laws of today's physics lol!

Okay when I'll go to nasa I'll use this theory 🧐 thank you 🤦🏻‍♀️😂

​@@gannoo9386 you have an anime chick pfp 😂 man take your "🤦‍♀️😂" to an anime chat lmao

⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠@@edgegodfrivolous”Your pfp says “creative” and you came up with the user “Epple” please refrain from insulting others.” - another anime chick named edgegodfrivolous.

​@@epple8673 they didn't even do shit to you, tf is wrong with you saying that to Anime pfps? Did they do something wrong that you'd target every last one of them? Don't do shit to people just because they have an Anime Pfp, that's just fucked up.

Keep in mind most of the visuals are computer generated. That’s not to say they aren’t realistic but they could be completely off for all we know

​@@youtubersdigest we do know what black holes look like. the one from interstellar was rendered using real world physics. even the people who worked on the render were confused as to why it looked like that but the scientists knew why.

@@VPshandlewasstolen I said most of those images bro I never said we don’t know what they look like. I’m not stupid. I’ve seen the pictures of black holes

some of them is not his and is not stock footage and is not credited

creepy

Yes I wish I could live long into the future to get a glimpse if we expand to the rest of the solar system

Feels suck when you witnessed the end of the earth tho

I wish I could do time travel

​@@Spaceismystery-cr5bj Hey stranger, You will after this life of yours is over.

Even tho you will die, you will take rebirth several times. So don't worry, you will get to see all the progresses of humanity in all the next lives of yours. Not just you, everybody else too

Yet....

Dude just describes a black hole and calls it an explanation

The only thing I'd change is the matter part. In order to understand the world around us better we need to go deeper than matter and energy. According to modern science, both matter and energy are a secondary event of an other phenomenon, the curvature of space. How does 3D space curve though? Where does it bend into? If I have a flat 2D plane and I bend it somewhere, I add an extra dimension to that plane, so from 2D I make it 3D. Now, back to the 3D space we know and perceive. If it bends, it has to be towards a 4th dimension, we need an extra direction. So in conclusion, a black hole is space that bends towards the 4th dimension to the extreme. Anything that is made of what we call matter is nothing but 4D curved space. The problem is that human physiology can perceive only curves within limits; we cannot see all sorts of radiations, only visible light. Same with sounds.

​@@stixoimatizontasYou're touching on something that's relevant but also irrelevant things, like the light we see. You're absolutely correct in saying black holes are not matter. It is the curvature of space time so warped that it creates an event horizon, which is a non-physical phenomenon. The event horizon doesn't actually exist. The singularity probably isn't infinitely dense, it probably is subatomic particles condensed to its tightest possible form, but beyond that... Yes, what does cause space to bend? If gravity is merely the bending of space and not the cause of it, and mass is the initiator of that bend...how?

​@@stixoimatizontasThere was a talk with some highly rated scientists a few years back. It is up on YT. It was about black holes. They gave best guesses on black holes. Having a second event horizon inside is likely, not having an actual singularity but a very very compressed ball is likely. I enjoyed it. Look it up maybe.

Wow, no shit Sherlock. But that didn't answer the question 🙄

The probe would collapse on itself and we would probably die 💀

Bruh😅 300 IQ

The probe wouldnt send anything (even light cant escape blackholes) also there is no blackhole near us and also the probe would be destroyed

​@@szczampodwiatr 🤓

@@szczampodwiatr theoretically as the Hawkings theory "Evaporation of the black holes" says we could could leave the information in the black hole and after few hundreds milions to few billions years it will be returned as particles that if we had a computer of enough strenght (quantum pc) we could put back together into the probe but im not sure if the probe would have a photo/info about the "core" of the black hole even if it took the photo/info the gravitational force would practically froze the probe in time so idk

its not "true", we dont know what happens if we enter, literally anything could happen, and white holes do still have gravity, so good luck getting away from it after youre on the other side

Watching*

​@@gannoo9386?????

😲🤯

Indeed, there is no mass (stuff) since nothing in the universe can hold up that intense crushed down mass. It’s a point of huge energy with the same value that all that mass was. Also not a wormhole since the ‘mass’ value is still there.

doubt it, white holes arent actually white, because they have gravity and an event horizon, which you can never enter, if this was the case you would just be stuck on its event horizon

bro

this did not age well

Just like how black holes are scary, but white holes are nowhere to be found

"If there is a hole, there is a goal." -Sun Tzu, The art of sex

That's what she said 😂

Good like solving the insane amount of physics and non sense formulas you think they teach astronomy? They just teach physics

It's astrophysics but ye

The opposite is white holes ,, there may be from color not in function, i think the term white holes represent the stars that rotates around black holes though there is no holes.

​@@bestiebestiebwhite holes are hypothetical objects that spit out light and matter rather than bringing it towards itself. Stars that orbit black holes already exist, and are not theoretical objects. Our sun technically revolves around a black hole, Sagittarius A*.

Yeah I agree 🤦🏻‍♀️

"i know you won't read this"🤓 and mf wrote a whole para

But you can still discover new assholes 😂

The nearest black hole is may light years away from Earth. Even if a black hole was to go straight for us, all life would be dead before the black hole could get near our solar system.

You mean 5th dimensional beings have built a Tesseract inside it, by using the Black Hole to power it, and the Tesseract allowes Us to take a glimpse & interact with particular moments in our lives? 😏 Sounds a lot cooler when you actually describe what happens in the movie, instead of just trying to sh*t on the concept. It was honestly a far more original idea than the same tired Sci-fi tropes we usually get, such as a worm hole, etc. IDK, I dug it. lol

No white holes have been detected up to this point. White holes, if they physically exist, repel matter and would have a horizon that would require accelerating beyond the speed of light to get any further to the center. Black holes are gravitational wells that attract matter, accelerating it inward. When approaching their horizon, you would have to accelerate greater and greater to keep from drifting inside. By crossing the threshold of the horizon, you would need to accelerate faster than speed of light in a vacuum upward. This kind of black hole wouldn’t emit particles, except for the incoherent thermal bath relative to a stationary frame outside the event horizon. This is what leads to their ultimate evaporation. The problem with the black hole described in the above paragraph, is that they don’t appear in nature - they’re always spinning and never still. It’s understandable though, given that they are born from rotating systems of matter themselves. The reason the supermassive ones glow so bright is due to the accreted matter following the trajectory of an inward spiral that is approaching the speed of light near the horizon. The frictional heating of particles orbiting close by cause them to radiate thermal energy, losing angular momentum and drifting inward. The loss of angular momentum reduces the particle velocity, forcing it to take on a lower orbit. At the same time, a portion of it’s gravitational potential energy is converted to increased velocity and the particle gains speed. This process of energy transformation repeats as it approaches the horizon, where the frictional heating of the particles emit X-ray spectrum photons. The relativistic jets I think you’re referring to are when matter is shot outward near the speed of light in two oppositely directed, and tightly collimated beams. This is a more complicated phenomena, one possible explanation is by the process of extracting energy of magnetic fields around the accretion disk, which get dragged and twisted by the spin of the black hole. The growing energy stored in the magnetic fields tightens to the extent that relativistic material gets launched. It could also be that the energy extracted by frame dragging produces the relativistic particle energy and momentum in combination with the other process, or on it’s own to power the jets.

@@bjornragnarsson8692 the black holes I'm referring to have stopped pulling stuff inwards all together and have been spitting massive amounts of matter and light in all directions, I'm not just talking about the cosmic jet streams, I'm not sure if this information is public yet though so that might be the cause of your confusion,

​@@bjornragnarsson8692white holes dont repel matter, they attract it, you will be pulled towards it, but you will never actually reach the horizon (until it turns back into a black hole)

What kind of hole are you talking about?💀

i like em black holes.

@@GoodGrief30 that's SUS💀

yall corny as hell

What im? R u saying im or in?

I think everyone would wish that honestly dying to those beautiful stars are somthing that only stupid person wouldn't wish

​@nagibator7163still

I wish to die by spaghettification from a black hole because I know I’ll die in less than a millisecond and it would be painless but at least I’ll be to see the black hole before that

I've read about it.. Islam.. You know 🧐✨

​@@gannoo9386 😊

Well I think I have a answer (I am not sure + also a 9th grader) I think the whole body spaghettiphises but it would get to the whole body only after it all of it crosses the event horizon (this would only take a few milliseconds or even nanoseconds). So, the answer to your question is that once the whole body crosses the event horizon the whole body would be effected by the gravity

As a physicist I am happy you think about this! a) newtonian gravity theory differs a lot from Einsteins theory, General Theory of Relativity(GRT). They will also give different predictions in spacetime regions where/when spacetime curvature (=GRT version of "gravity") or other relativistic effects get stronger (speeds nearing C, etc) b) An Event Horizon is just the surface inside which the (GRT version of) escape velocity >c which means NO INFORMATION can leave that region any more. Theoretically precisely AT the ev.hor. photons could go around forever, a bit outside it they spiral outward and escape, a bit inside it spiral inward and fall into... nobody knows whats in the center of a BH, Gen. Relat. theory gives a division by zero, which is surely not physical , QM would never allow 'zero' (GRT has no quantum mechanics built into it, so it must be wrong in those situations when QM effects become strong) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwarzschild_radius BUT: This has per se nothing to do w spagettification which can start getting strong either inside OR outside the event horizont. c) Spagettification is "just" an extreme case of " tidal forces" which 1) deform planets when circling each other, like moon deforms earth which we know as "tides" (also present in the rock, but bigger in the oceans) and vice versa (but moon is only of rock plus smaller so tide is smaller). 2) when they get too close the smaller one gets destroyed to a ring, google for "Roche limit". This is because gravity gets stronger when nearer (Newtonian attraction is proportional to 1/r^2 , Einsteinian is less simple but nearly the same result in spacetime regions of weak gravity). This tidal forces are a weaker variant of spagettification. The effect depends on size of the objects (compared to things like density and strength of their matter) Imagine a black hole whith Earths mass which would be TINY, and place its center 1cm below your feet. Your feet will have R=1cm , your head perhaps R=170 cm distance from it. Your feet will be attracted MUCH stronger by the BH than your head. It will tear you apart...uhm, sorry bout that, but was that not worth to understand this...? :-p With Earth this does NOT work: you cannot be within 1cm from Earths center, as it has a radius of 6000 km. Its Surface Gravity is MUCH weaker than that of the BH of *same* mass. The difference btwn 6000km and 6000km+170cm is barely noticable. You see, for this tidal force / spagettification effect we do not need Einsteinian Gravity theory, this already exists in Newtons theory too. But BHs are not really nicely defined in this theory, since the concept of speed of light as maximum speed of information is not part of this theory. Einsteins Gravity theory (GRT) is more difficult with the curved spacetime plus the equations are very difficult to solve. It contains in a natural way the notion of "speed of light" or max speed of information; GRT is a generalisation of special theory of relativity (SRT). Use google or chatgtp and dont give up being curious:) YT has excellent channels like" PBS space time", too! Greetings from Budapest :)

...and, uh , hope I am not too blunt, but Kobi is not a physicist, he is obviously not an expert on these topics. Nice vids nevertheless!

@@jbruck6874 Thank you so much for the explanation. This made a lot more sense to me.

​​​​@@adriankarotia5412Were you replying to me? Just asking😀

He did?

A singularity also stops being a physical place, but becomes a point in time once you enter the horizon

black holes are not simple at all

But what is inside of it? Inside a planet there’s well, rock, minerals, lava, dirt, water etc, in a star there is plasma, hydrogen and other things, same applies to neutron stars, galaxies, proton stars, and really everything except for..Black holes, like what is inside a black hole? Is there hydrogen or maybe oxygen or maybe carbon or what? We literally may never ever know, hell, black holes could even have a surface that we wouldn’t even be able to verify if true, i know that’s a long shot but anything is possible