Yes yes, it all makes sense now. Bravo! Great work!

I've never learned so much info under 3 minutes!

Thank you im in criminal justice court & corrections class and i keep hearing original jurisdiction.

The explanation is simple, very clear, and easy to understand. THANK YOU.

Thank you so much for making this! I have a government midterm coming up, and this concept will be on the test. You explained it perfectly (I’ve tried lots of different resources, and yours is by far the best!). Keep up the great work! 😃

Well explained!

Thank you so much! I have a test tomorrow on courts and I was stressing out! Thank you so much this video helped out a lot. :)

Nice explanation

Awesome video. Thank you! If I pass the bar i'll come back and thank you again haha

Thank you!

Is this video available with closed captions?

Thank you ❤️

The current SCOTUS has a major ethics problem and the court needs to be expanded with term limits.

Very good graphics which is helpful. I will use for my students. Only issue is whether a car accident is a good example of a case filed in U.S. District Court - how does a federal court have jurisdiction over a car accident? maybe there is a federal statute, but that seems unlikely. I will show this to my students, but with all due respect, tell them that a better example for filing a case in U.S. District Court would be a claim related to federal law or the U.S. Constitution, and car accidents are adjudicated in state courts, not federal courts.

Two very fundamental issues emanate from the existence of "original jurisdiction re SCOTUS and cases between States re Presidential elections 2020": (1) Such cases rely on merit of the principle that the plaintiff state need only present sufficient basis to show self-breach of substantive law of the defending state/s . This does not require a pile of evidence, and (2) The US Supreme Court, itself, in this unique and special circumstances if it is not careful in delivering a very just ( along the best rules of Natural Justice) judgement in the intent of Texas, it may very well be the last time those judges may ever be privileged to perform at the SCOTUS with such esteemed and critically powerful level as judges of the supreme court. If the judgement favors the party that will pack the Supreme court (God forbid) after the judgement, those very judges may as well also pack up and exit the scene and perhaps forget that they ever entered the "now-once" very noble profession, for the Dems will forever destroy the common notion of jusrisprudence at the highest level of the USA. Beware, justices, how you exercise your "power of choice" at this most critical juncture in the history of the free world! If the present configuration is allowed to be altered by the potential packing by the dems, it will most verily herald the end of the end of the hope of a fair and just remedy, in protection of the most fundamental human right. It will be a forever free fall down the precipice of a just humanity. I beseech you to allow the divine hand to guide you, as trustees of law, in this, the darkest moment in legal human history. "Lead kindly, Oh light"

Could you imagine the 2 states trading water rights land rights ect, the Supreme Court wants to rule on those issues while or rights are being abrivilated by smaller courts , the water land state vs state ect, they hear those cases courts we meant to protect us not states ...unreal

Batman has no jurisdiction

Hy

I can't understand anything