she is not saying that hypothesis has been solved she is saying It has been claimed to be solved by that person .

@@mrunknown-jd7xd ,please see the first sentence of my comment. I said the 'title' is misleading. The title says the hypothesis is 'solved', though it supposed to be like 'claimed to solve'.

@@travelgalaxy8291 don't worry bro it's just strategy to gain views like other video though it is not bad for some informative videos

@@yashpatel4264 , bro, it is not my objection but CMI(Clay Math institute) director himself said he is astonished by misleading news in Indian media. The channel can earn views on other matters but not with mathematics. Also if the title were something like "indian mathematician claim to solve Riemann hypothesis", then also equal views could have been obtained. Another problem is that many don't play full video, also many don't know what is Riemann hypothesis, in those cases certainly people would be misled.

@@travelgalaxy8291 you right bro , but it is what it is, and will never change so leave it man 👍🏻

yes

😂😂😂

LMAO🤣😂

Brother it's very different from your thoughts. Even he published his mathematical work ! . Get lost, you'll never understand Pure mathematics. Fool man . Like that everybody declined S. chandrshekhar and meghnad Saha 's work , but today in Astrophysics, Astrophysicist and cosmologist... Using chandrshekhar limit and Saha equation.

Bro, you need to publish this in your twitter and than it 'd be mean that.

U Simp bcuz of u people women are unsafe

Ur a simp, u must be reported back

​@@sanketpatel5688 simp #2

@@maxwellsequation4887 homie tell me the definition of simp

Its just you bro

😂😂😂😂😊

😂😂😂😂😊

You can also say it in another way, copy paste from Google 😂😂. Those exact words 🤣🤣

Sabse phele apne proof ko publish karna padta hai tab jake duniya bhar ke genius mathematician proof ko check karenge aur phir jake pata chalta hai ki right hai ki wrong. Online bhi publish kar sakte hai.

Wt r u trying to say

@@ashwinks706 All numbers are comprised of Primes but not all numbers are comprised of non-Primes. Primes make up the building blocks of infinity. They are telling the other numbers what to do. People are looking at numbers and infinity incorrectly. Infinity is Prime so case closed on the Hypothesis. all the non-zeros have the same point of origin as does infinity so all of them are going to be in the same place just on an endless line. You are never going to find one that doesn’t share this behavior with every other prime.

Ok let me try to follow through what you just said. You're saying Zeta(infinity) = 0. Then you are saying infinity × infinity = infinity^infinity. Then you're saying infinity^infinity = infinity² Then you state that if 2 is prime, then infinity must also be prime. The Riemann Hypothesis is that all nontrivial zeroes lie on the line Re(z) = ½. The limit as x tends to infinity of zeta(x) is 0, so it is probably one of the TRIVIAL zeroes. Not only that, but you say that the answer to the Riemann Hypothesis is infinity. What does that mean? The question is "Do all the nontrivial zeroes lie on the ½ line?" That is a Yes/No question. Infinity is neither yes or no. Next you say: infinity × infinity = infinity^infinity infinity^infinity = infinity² You can remove the first line as the LHS becomes infinity². Yes, technically this can be true, but playing directly with infinity is delicate, since it's more a concept. Then you say if 2 is prime, infinity is also a prime. But how do you get that from Line 2/3? Are you saying x^prime = x^2 implies x is prime? What?

@@BambinaSaldana All numbers are comprised of Primes but not all numbers are comprised of non-Primes. Primes make up the building blocks of infinity. They are telling the other numbers what to do. People are looking at numbers and infinity incorrectly. Infinity is Prime so case closed on the Hypothesis. all the non-zeros have the same point of origin as does infinity so all of them are going to be in the same place just on an endless line. You are never going to find one that doesn’t share this behavior with every other prime.

@@alexanderealley9992 1. What do you mean "All numbers are comprised of Primes"? Are you talking about their prime factors? 2. What do you mean by all non-zeroes have the same origin? What does point of origin mean in this context?

That's why the title has the word solved in apostrophes, as a way of mocking it.

Haha i think its solved when calculas got invented

When 1/infinity is solved it changed history by dt

Average secondary school physics/math enthusiast:

It should because it is solved...Indeed a good news. Hope the mathematician get the due recognition.

​@@kamrupexpress it's not solved The solution is flawed, because his assumptions are wrong. That's why it's not approved. But his attempt is worthy of mention.

Lol average Indians be like :

​@@thewolverine7516avg cumskin

Thanks for the solid support!

😂😂

She basically copy pasted from Google

Bruh what