How was the sound quality compared to let’s say Dolby?

@@guillermoz4914 I would class it as good and above average but Dolby Cinema is slightly superior for audio. The audio was clear but didn't quite have the same punch of Dolby Cinema. Also I don't think Screen X has height channels that Dolby does

So did i

I'm excited to hear that, im going to see it in an hour and it's my first screenX experience.

Its pointless if its not used throughout the movie. It would constantly disturb your experience of the story. Damn. Thanks for sharing

Cinerama used that system. It came long before Screen X.

What would be great if we would get a screen that they used to shoot the mandalorian curves all around you and you feel like you are in the movie. Even if its just enviromental staff and nothing happening there it would feel like VR almost

I agree, most of a persons focus is on one screen at the front so I feel like Screen X doesn’t work. Also I went to a screening of Godzilla King of monsters and it just looked blurry . Apparently it’s what people have been asking for 😂

Depends on what film you watch. You have to watch a film that was formatted for it

Yea so would the ticlet prices

@@TwerkForWork but why thought instead of building two rooms and let people deciding between them you have everything in one place and people who want either would book. So im effectively almost half the cost for cinemas and same amount money made. Shiuldnt be more expensive. Instead of 2 half full rooms going with a movie 1 full room. I think its brilliant idea. Lots of people thirn between 1 or the other. This wouldnt be an issue if combined and probably would attract some people who didnt find 1 or the other by itself entertaining enough. Combined whole new experience.

just watched top gun with 4dx and screenx combined in korea! it was more expensive than usual with around 18bucks but it was more than worth it

@@laszlogere5062 On top of that, it also having Dolby Atmos and the screens being IMAX screens.

and 3d included. It would be mind blowing.

I know right, quite the claim to make

Napoleon (1927): Am I a joke to you? (3 35mm camera in 4:3 aspect ratio)

Yep, cinerama, first movie I saw was "the Brothers Grimm", must been about 1963. Followed by: How the West was Won

At keast cinerama synced tge picture onto a single screen..not sure why there is a gap..but cinemas do reivent themselves with gimmicks..look at 4dx( mind your necks and back lol!!) Person I prefer a huge single screen with top notch presentation. That will do nicely thanks x

Also had the same aspect ratio as ScreenX.

@@vgmaster9 So ..... Everything old is new again.

I had the pleasure of seeing the roadshow restoration of "Napoleon" back in 1981 with a LIVE orchestra. It was not in the true "Polyvision" format with a 4.00 : 1 aspect ratio, but in a triptych presentation more akin to the original Cinerama. It was memorable.

sometime people should just shut their mouth. you should experience it first ! it tricking your brain like you in a plane or helicopter, can even make you dizzy.

@@kennethli9912 if it makes me dizzy, it isn’t good.

Your brain erases those lines subconsciously

The point is to get a peripheral experience from it. You don't need to focus on the sides.

​@@kennethli9912Why don't you shut your?

Disney's Circlevision?

That's what the theater in my area did too.

That's what Barco Escape did. For some reason that folded.

I had forgotten all about that. I was told by my father that we had seen the movie MacKenna's Gold in that format.

@@deecee784 I found this about MacKenna’s Gold on IMDB: This movie was originally planned to be shown in single lens Cinerama with reserved seat roadshow engagements, but Columbia executives changed their minds and pulled the plug on that idea. This movie was drastically cut down from nearly three hours plus an intermission, to just over two hours. Although most of the movie was photographed on 65mm stock, to save a buck, a handful of scenes were filmed in 35mm anamorphic and then optically blown-up with disastrous results. The blown-up scenes are exceedingly grainy and have bad color.

@@Ian-Steele I was 12 or 13 years old when I saw it when we were visiting relatives in L.A. who were in the film industry so my recollections are well over 50 years old. The screen was something like a 60 or 90 degree wrap that was curved and special built. A man came out on the stage in front of the screen and talked for about five minutes about how happy he was to see all of us, and he was proud to have us all experience the future of cinema. During the scene where the canyon fell into itself the effect was truly spectacular. A few weeks later we got back home and I waited for the "future of cinema" to catch up with us. It didn't. Years later I was in either Disneyland or Disney world and saw their travelouge documentary of America in the format where you stood through it an could see where you were going, either sides of you and where you had been. It was awesome !.

@@deecee784 It’s fascinating to read all about the various formats that have been tried to ‘enhance’ the experience of watching a movie. Wikipedia has a good article about Cinerama. I also remember Sensurround where giant low frequency speakers were placed in the corners of the cinema to give a deep vibration at key points in the movie. I saw the film Earthquake in that format in London.

@@Ian-Steele It is fascinating all the different ways they have tried to supplement the "movie going experience" through the decades. But I'd be happier if they concentrated on better scripts and movies in general. In the 1960s I was a kid and worked six or eight hours a week and could afford to go to four or five movies a week plus munchies and a drink and have money to spend. Now my wife and myself have a hard time finding anything we even want to spend money on, once every two weeks. Very rarely do we find a funny live-action comedy these days. Sorry about the "old man rant" ---- but it definitely was a different time. If it's still playing near you check out the animated movie "The Bad Guys" ---- it was very funny, and I think it was actually aimed at adults more than children

Was it really good? They are re-releasing it on screenx in my city next Saturday

@@m00dmvzik Same here. Wasn't sure if I want to go yet but I am interested

@mattwatkins5580 Maannn I wait too late to get tickets. Only seats available are at the front of the screen 😒

How was it? Do you recommend to watch Spider-man in screen x?

@koko baeur I already bought the tickets :' someone told me that it was fantastic, now I'm sad, but thank you.

@@jeffersongutierritos2884 how was it?

@@jeffersongutierritos2884 how was it ?

@@jeffersongutierritos2884 im about to book tickets for no way home how was it on screenx

Best experience, as in most theatre formats I'd say, would be middle middle. But I was middle far left, and it was still great. You don't need to focus on the side screens to catch key things or anything. It just gives you a wide peripheral and a sense of depth. I thought it was very effective. And I just saw 'Elvis', not an action or anything. It's pretty cool.

how wAS IT?

@@Az-ii8zi it was amazing

How is it?

@@srinjoypal7605 it was good, only the action scenes were on all three screens though.

@@Tash808_ which Inox?

Ngl, out of all of their new screens, screenX is definitely the worst. Imax or 4dx is what you want

@@kylomeep4046 ok but wat does ngl mean

@@joshdear5724 not gonna lie

@@kylomeep4046 why is it bad

@@DanielMazz so there are a few things that all 3 of the screenX screens I have tested have in common. For reference, they are Leeds, Castleford and Newcastle. The side screens are noticeably lower quality than the main screen and obviously don't work with 3D. They are only used for like 10 minutes of the 2 hour movie (happened on every movie and I've seen like 15 in there). As well as this, they only turn on when something is about to happen and that completely removed the suspense in IT chapter 2 as it basically just told me when a scare will happen Not worth the extra money imo

Exactly, this ScreenX looks uncomfortable.

How was it?

Update

going see the new batman moie like it

Or "Sensurround" where a huge subwoofer would shake the whole building and make the building structurally unsound 😂😂

Your country did you a favour. Screen X ruins the suspense of films. Especially horror and thriller films