What is the Christian Universalist Association?

  Рет қаралды 27,955

Ready to Harvest

Ready to Harvest

2 жыл бұрын

When we talk about universalism, most people think of the UUs (Unitarian Universalist Association). But they aren't necessarily Christian anymore. In comes the CUA, presenting their vision for a Christian Universalism.

Пікірлер: 705
@vcrsalesman2606
@vcrsalesman2606 2 жыл бұрын
In some Catholic circles there is the idea that is ok to *hope* that all might be saved (but not ok to declare it definitely) . This idea comes from Origen. I’m Catholic and was taught growing up that it’s possible for those of other faiths, who don’t know of Christ through no fault of their own, to be saved. Ultimately who’s saved and who’s not is up to God.
@bouseuxlatache4140
@bouseuxlatache4140 2 жыл бұрын
You are right. This is a thought born at the beginning of the 20th century. There are however some American catholic bishop who talk about it. It goes rather against what the catholic church has alwayys taught.
@RonJohn63
@RonJohn63 2 жыл бұрын
That even those who have never heard of Christ might be saved comes from Romans 2:12-16.
@edwardhill7045
@edwardhill7045 2 жыл бұрын
when people say they are catholic WHAT EXACTLY DO THEY MEAN ?
@RonJohn63
@RonJohn63 2 жыл бұрын
@@edwardhill7045 you're kidding, right? (By definition, all Catholics are in communion with the Bishop of Rome.)
@rustystealberg4198
@rustystealberg4198 2 жыл бұрын
@@edwardhill7045 it means we're in the Church Jesus Christ founded with the successor of Peter as its vicar
@jacobcarter6332
@jacobcarter6332 2 жыл бұрын
As a catholic I really have to thank you for this channel, your calm and clear explanation of ideas allows me to easily Google protestant buzz words. Often when I talk with protestants they would throw out so many of these it would be hard to fully grasp. Your channel has helped. So thanks my man
@EcclesiastesLiker-py5ts
@EcclesiastesLiker-py5ts Жыл бұрын
The UUs aren't long for the world, that sort of teaching inevitably leads to a collapse in numbers.
@CCiPencil
@CCiPencil 11 ай бұрын
This is ironic considering the Catholic Church condemns ALL to HELL who doesn’t align with their false dogmas.
@MAMoreno
@MAMoreno 2 жыл бұрын
Well, I'm glad that there's an option for people who think that the UU has gone too far off from Christianity. I'd still favor a group that was stronger on trinitarianism, but at least it's an improvement over the UU's post-Christian stance.
@---wp3oc
@---wp3oc 2 жыл бұрын
I agree, and I would also add that there should be a stronger distinction between Christian inclusivism (all religions lead to God ultimately) kind of universalism and "orthodox universalism" for lack of a better term, which holds that all souls in hell will eventually come to Christ in repentance and be reconciled to the Kingdom of God.
@MAMoreno
@MAMoreno 2 жыл бұрын
@@---wp3oc Indeed.
@quinnjohnson9750
@quinnjohnson9750 2 жыл бұрын
To my knowledge the majority from what I know within the Christian Universalist community are mainly trinitarian but we do tolerate other opinions of what they think of the God Head.
@kathryn3466
@kathryn3466 2 жыл бұрын
I agree. I went to a UU church for a little while and I never felt spiritually fulfilled. They tiptoed around whether God even existed and was super political. I now go to an Episcopal church and it's so much better. We spend the entire service worshiping God and politics are rarley mentioned. In my opinion, I have 6 days a week where I can think about politics. For one hour on Sunday, I want to go deeper on a spiritual level.
@samuelaliren870
@samuelaliren870 2 жыл бұрын
This isn't Christianity
@Doigt101
@Doigt101 2 жыл бұрын
As always, a well-presented, informative presentation. So much packed into so few minutes.
@siamez3887
@siamez3887 11 ай бұрын
This video has solved many troubles ive had in my faith. I believe our loving god, will forgive us, dispite our faith as long as we live good, kind, loving lives.
@toranshaw4029
@toranshaw4029 2 жыл бұрын
Since I posted my first comment, on this video, I've attended a few services of their online only congregation. I haven't decided if I'll join them, but I'm liking what I see, thus far! Update: I've put in a request to potentially join the congregation. 🙂
@qbert3306
@qbert3306 2 жыл бұрын
Very good video! Thanks for all the great theological content.
@director365
@director365 2 жыл бұрын
Another interesting and informative video. Thanks!
@falleneldor
@falleneldor 2 жыл бұрын
“Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’” (Matthew 7:21-23).
@efandmk3382
@efandmk3382 2 жыл бұрын
And I will say to them, I did not see you tending the sick, feeding the poor, clothing the naked. As you have done to the least among you, you have done it to me. Away from me, I never knew you". It's nice that you quote Jesus. So few do. But get it right. Nothing will send more to hell than King James, and his self edited and re-written version of the Bible will.
@falleneldor
@falleneldor 2 жыл бұрын
@EF ANDMK i appriciate your commemt. It is certainly an opinion shared by many. I go in and out to be honest. I certainly see your point. As john points out, in the begining jesus "is the word". So Jesus says is the only thing that should matter to anyone and everyone. Truth be told, I'm not a "quoter", more a paraphrasfor. I like that biblehub and bible gateway will list the many, MANY english translations from the modern to older ones. More so then being able google chaper and verses, i enjoy most trying to comprehend the original greek, Aramaic (which is the language he likly spoke given the cultural context of his era) and original hebrew which is the source for the many, many times he quotes from old testament documents. Something will almost always be lost in translations, even the best ones. I don't particularly care for King James, i like NIV as the archaic english makes dense material even more incomprehensible to modern readers. Whats truly amazing is contrasting a chaper & verse, and seeing how universal the core meaning is across the various versions of English translations. My absolute favorite english bible, is the Word of Promise Full audio drama. The full cast, sound effects and music brings life to such ancient wisdom and knowledge! I'm pretty sure its NIV.
@falleneldor
@falleneldor 2 жыл бұрын
Actually, i just checked; its the NKJV.
@collinsa8909
@collinsa8909 Жыл бұрын
@@efandmk3382 didn't king James simply translate a manuscript diligently? Any proof the injected their own bias into it to sell their theology? I read many bibles where a literal translation of a verse usually reads like the kjv
@brendaboykin3281
@brendaboykin3281 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Joshua. 🌹🌹🌹
@spinningbacksidekick
@spinningbacksidekick 2 жыл бұрын
Glad to know that this denomination is around. About 15 years ago, I was visiting UU churches. I took the intro class at the one closest to me. A boy around 16 was interested in joining and brought his parents with. His father mentioned God and this young couple went ballistic and said things like "only stupid people believe in a magic man in the sky" or something along those lines. I didn't stick around too much longer. It's a shame. They were nice people and it was a nice church. But yeah, evangelical atheism is not something I wanted in my life.
@stevenking6129
@stevenking6129 2 жыл бұрын
As a long time Christian Universalist I appreciate this video greatly. Thanks for all your videos actually, I've been a denominational nerd since about 1980 and could watch these all day. Peace
@Luredreier
@Luredreier 2 жыл бұрын
I'm an atheist in Norway, and I'd like to thank you for your stance. :-) It feels way more healthy then many of the alternatives.
@raphaelralph6521
@raphaelralph6521 Жыл бұрын
Can I ask on what are your views on the end of times?
@jeskerjames3260
@jeskerjames3260 Жыл бұрын
CUA sounds interesting and better than the UU, but I can't get behind them entirely as I am a Trinitarian, a believer in original sin, and much more morally conservative. I personally came to believe in Christian Universalism due to a number of arguments by which I could not refute, none of which stem from the usual statement of "Well a just God wouldn't allow anyone to suffer eternally." No see, I very much believe we are all deserving of eternal punishment when compared to an infinitely perfect and good God. No see, what compelled me to accept the idea of Universal Salvation was the following reasons: 1.) If all of humanity fell into sin due to the original sin of Adam and must suffer those consequences thus so, then it makes sense that all would be redeemed through the new Adam which is Christ. Just as we had no choice in being born into a fallen state, it also would make sense we have no choice in our ultimate redemption and perfection. 2.) If Christ came to die for all the world, then if even one soul is ultimately lost, Christ has come up short. Being the second member of the perfect Triune God, he cannot fail in anyway and must ultimately have the victory over every heart and every soul. Meaning in the end his sacrifice and resurrection must redeem all of humanity. Otherwise Christ would not be perfect. 3.) To go along with point 2, it is a much more profound statement of God claiming victory over the hearts of even his most stubborn of enemies. The idea of Christ the conquerer in the end conquering every human heart is a testament to his unlimited majesty and power over creation. 4.) Universal Salvation does not mean escape from punishment or a lack of justice. Jesus' sacrifice on the cross reconciles us with God the Father, and let me be clear, ONLY Jesus' sacrifice would sufficient to reconcile us to the Father. Ordinarily we would be deserving of eternal punishment for sinning against an eternal and infinite God, as such only the sacrifice of God himself in Jesus would suffice to pay that debt, and as stated in point one, it is through Jesus that all the world will ultimately be reconciled to the Father. But we must still pay for our individual sins which must carry some level of punishment. As such I believe that Hell will be more akin to purgatory. A place where we suffer just and divine punishment for our sins, the length of which may be short or may be beyond comprehension in length and through this refiners crucible we will be made perfect. Through this suffering we will not only be cleansed of our sins, but we shall be reconciled to all we have harmed in this life. Only then will we all be fit to enter the glorious Kingdom of God. 5.) Since God is perfect, he would be perfectly efficient. I don't see the efficiency of keeping souls in eternal torment. I believe Benjamin Franklin said something along the lines of "In God's creation I see that not one drop of water is wasted, so too how much more valuable is the soul than a drop of water, that it would not be wasted either." That's not word for word, but that is the general meaning of his quote. I tend to agree with Franklin that not one soul should go to waste in fire forever, since God has to be perfectly efficient. 6.) When reading the Ancient Greek that the New Testament was originally written in, the Greek word "Aeon" often is translated as "Eternity" When in truth it is more accurate to say "Age". Meaning punishment will last an "Age" not an "Eternity" and we should always try to follow the original intent of the original language the Old Testament (Ancient Hebrew) and New Testament (Ancient Greek) were written in. 7.) Continuing from point 4, the reason one should accept Christ and follow him in this life regardless of everyone being saved in the end is number 1, it is simply good and right to do so. Number 2, by living as Christ commands we may lessen our punishment in the refiners crucible. But we should not do what is right either to avoid punishment or to seek the rewards of Heaven, but rather simply because it is the right thing to do and should be done out of love for God and for our fellow humans. For those who do not learn to follow Christ in this life, they will learn in the refiners crucible. In other words you can become a Christian and child of God the easy or the hard way, but in the end Christ will conquer your heart and the victory over all creation will be his. No one, no soul, no entity will escape being under his rule and submission and that is a far more powerful and beautiful message than simply eternal torment for some and eternal life for others. For in the end it makes God ruler of all fully and completely. However, though I have adopted the idea of Christian Universalism, my beliefs stem more from the teachings of early church fathers such as Origen of Alexandria, rather than groups such as the UU or the CUA, the former of which is barely recognizable as Christianity in any shape or form and has abandon the moral teachings of the faith in favor of fitting in with the world. The latter of which is only somewhat better. This is why I have viewed myself as more of Christian Mystic in the same vein as the early Eastern Orthodox Church Fathers than a UU or CUA.
@serpentsepia6638
@serpentsepia6638 Жыл бұрын
The CUA is made up of Baptists and secularist Jewish people. This is why they don't believe in original sin and invoke Richard Rohr who is pushing for a secularist Catholic faith and reformation.
@kristinaraykova8169
@kristinaraykova8169 10 ай бұрын
But I believe that Christians won’t go to that hell as we believe in the blood of Jesus being shed for us and was already saved.
@jeskerjames3260
@jeskerjames3260 10 ай бұрын
@@kristinaraykova8169 But if we were to commit a sin against another...let's murder for example. Should we not pay for the life we took? Sure we have been forgiven, but forgiven toward God, not toward the person whose life we stole. Would it not make sense then that for every year that person would have lived had we had not taken his/her life we should suffer punishment for an equal amount of time? Plus more time because of the pain and suffering we caused them and their family and friends? If we suffered a punishment for that, we could be with that person and their loved ones in Heaven without the shame of the transgression we took against them because we would have suffered the just punishment for that sin.
@MichaelServantOfChrist
@MichaelServantOfChrist 10 ай бұрын
So, lets see if you will be consistent. Aeon means age, amen. So, in Revelation 1:18, Jesus lives aeon to aeon. As in Revelation 14:10-11, people are tormented for aeon to aeon. Are you willing to deny the divinity of Jesus? Torment lasts the same amount of time that Jesus lives.
@user-fc2zb9po8t
@user-fc2zb9po8t 2 ай бұрын
@@MichaelServantOfChristThe smoke rises forever. It doesn’t say they’re tortured forever! Guess where else in the Bible it says the smoke rises forever? Do you think that smoke is literally still rising? You’re just simply wrong. Holding onto this evil doctrine is holding you back. God is not of fear. You shame the Lord for continuing to believe this lie
@PUAlum
@PUAlum 2 жыл бұрын
thanks for this one! I want to check into it.
@davidangus8127
@davidangus8127 Жыл бұрын
This was really interesting. Think it sums up my beliefs quite well!
@hectorerrera
@hectorerrera 2 жыл бұрын
I see that you're sowing seeds. Some will grow. ☺️
@justinreagan8260
@justinreagan8260 2 жыл бұрын
Starting in the old testament in Genesis and continuing until today, people have tried to create a God in their own image and it has never worked out well for them. I really do pray that God would remove the blinders from their eyes.
@zelenisok
@zelenisok 2 жыл бұрын
True. Bigots have always tried to present God as vindicating their pointless bigotries and superstitions. But of course that is nonsense, God is love, and love will have everyone saved. Not just the 99 sheep, but even the 100th.
@RonJohn63
@RonJohn63 2 жыл бұрын
Starting with *the beginning of humanity* "people have (created Gods) in their own image". FTFY.
@bruhmoment11111
@bruhmoment11111 2 жыл бұрын
@@zelenisok God is just and God is merciful. And by the law Jesus gave, everybody is a sinner. I think what disgusts me the most about the bigots is that they make God out to be a wrathful, angry God who punishes the sinners. In the mind of the bigot, they aren't sinners, only the people who are beneath them. I wish the bigot understood this better. The God THEY created (an angry God) would punish them, too, because they broke the rules. Maybe if they saw it that way, they would understand the mercy of God, and how the wrath and justice of God stand in contrast as a result of God's merch
@communityuniversalistchurch
@communityuniversalistchurch 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the unbiased coverage of our association. If folks here are interested, our congregation meets online and is officially associated with the CUA. The CUA is an umbrella group, and its members come from many different backgrounds. The founders were a mix of folks: UUs, Baptists, Methodists, Pentecostals, Evangelicals, etc. Many of the best recent books on universal salvation are by Evangelicals, in fact. They grapple very seriously with the question of universalism from an Evangelical worldview.
@communityuniversalistchurch
@communityuniversalistchurch 2 жыл бұрын
Some Suggested Books: That All Shall Be Saved by David Bently Hart (Eastern Orthodox), The Evangelical Universalist by Gregory MacDonald (Evangelical), The Inescapable Love of God by Tom Talbott (Evangelical), Patristic Universalism by David Burnfield (Evangelical), The Universalist's Book of Reference by Everet Guild (Universalist, 1881), Universalism, the Prevailing Doctrine of the Christian Church During Its First Five Hundred Years by John Wesley Hanson (Universalist, 1899)
@allegoria07
@allegoria07 2 жыл бұрын
@@communityuniversalistchurch That all shall be saved is my personal favorite 👍
@Inhumantics
@Inhumantics 2 жыл бұрын
Greetings and peace!!
@noway2708
@noway2708 2 жыл бұрын
ultimate reconciliation as defined in scripture shall not be confused with the universalism
@samuelaliren870
@samuelaliren870 2 жыл бұрын
You will follow the devil to hell
@pauljoseph326
@pauljoseph326 2 жыл бұрын
Excellent depiction . Keep it up
@anglicangeorgia5200
@anglicangeorgia5200 2 жыл бұрын
Please make video about Old Catholics (Union of Utrecht).
@michaelchristopher2003
@michaelchristopher2003 2 жыл бұрын
Great video bro
@sethmoking
@sethmoking 2 жыл бұрын
Is that sweater you're wearing 100% wool? If so, where'd you get it? I'm looking for something like that.
@Godsglory777
@Godsglory777 2 жыл бұрын
All of that and your response is about his shirt? LOL funny stuff.
@abaddon2148
@abaddon2148 2 жыл бұрын
girl you can't even see half of his sweater
@CamelBlue777
@CamelBlue777 2 жыл бұрын
@@abaddon2148 good point! Could be a crop top
@DAsiebert
@DAsiebert Жыл бұрын
@@CamelBlue777 Lok
@rugbybeef
@rugbybeef Жыл бұрын
As a UU, I would venture to say that the congregation count is not an ideal measure of the number of folks/congregations which have members who hold these beliefs. UU churches are less likely to express such an affiliation as their members hold such a diversity of views (as you well acknowledge). That said, if one were to count every UU church which contained at least a single member who held concordant beliefs with the CUA as an affiliate thereof, I feel you would be hard pressed to find a single UU congregation that could not be listed.
@potatoheadpokemario1931
@potatoheadpokemario1931 6 ай бұрын
I feel that any Church will find at least one member that rejects official statements of faith, either because they believe that's something they can work through or because they don't know that's official church doctrine
@TypicalGoosie
@TypicalGoosie 5 ай бұрын
I’m a hopeful Universalist, I don’t believe he’ll is eternal, but rather a state of spiritual death that comes from being separated from God. If Christ can raise the dead then he’ll doesn’t have to be eternal. I hope in my heart that in the end, all mankind will be reconciled to a right standing and relationship with their creator. Although this hope is also dependant on the will of those who have rejected God and if it is possible for them to have a change of heart in the afterlife.
@josephanglada4785
@josephanglada4785 2 жыл бұрын
In a sense, I'm a Christian with Salvation-agnostic views on non Christians. We cannot really know who will be saved in the End, but Jesus Christ is the best option so far.
@baronofbahlingen9662
@baronofbahlingen9662 2 жыл бұрын
That’s the position of the Orthodox Church; Christ and the church he founded are the guarantee of salvation, but it is not impossible otherwise.
@josephstalin8337
@josephstalin8337 Жыл бұрын
@@baronofbahlingen9662 this is false. There is no salvation outside of the church
@teachmetruth3539
@teachmetruth3539 Жыл бұрын
I know who will be saved 😁. The bride of Christ. That’s who Christ died for and no one else. Ephesians 5:25 (KJV) Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for her;
@bluemastermage4874
@bluemastermage4874 2 жыл бұрын
Here’s the thing. After researching the original Greek and Hebrew of the Bible, I have come to agree that the Bible does more so suggest universal salvation in the end and a temporary Hell. So on the doctrine of Universal salvation itself I tend to find myself agreeing not because of anything people do but because in the end if God is perfect then he must ultimately save all souls since only the salvation of all would be considered a full and total victory of the Cross. In other words God will conquer the human soul of itself. However my issue with the universalist churches is that they will use the original Greek and Hebrew text to justify their stance on salvation yet will ignore it when it comes to moral teachings. To me this is hypocritical. You can’t just pick and choose what you want from the Bible. Even if all will be saved in the end, You should still fight the cultural and moral battles and call out people for being wrong both to spare them divine punishment (even if it is finite) and simply because it is the right thing to do. So while I can accept the doctrine of universal salvation I cannot associate myself with any universalist church due to their laxed stance on Biblical morality and humanists leanings.
@deeveevideos
@deeveevideos Жыл бұрын
1 Timothy 4:10 ESV “For to this end we toil and strive, because we have our hope set on the living God, who is the Savior of all people, especially of those who believe ”
@thomasburke9060
@thomasburke9060 Жыл бұрын
What does it mean for the Apostle to say that God is the savior _especially_ of believers?
@deeveevideos
@deeveevideos Жыл бұрын
@@thomasburke9060 It means no one would be left out.
@thomasburke9060
@thomasburke9060 Жыл бұрын
@@deeveevideos No, that's not an answer. The verse implicitly makes a distinction between the way in which God is the savior of the unbelievers, and the way in which God is the savior of the believers, and it says that God is _especially_ the savior of the believers, meaning in some way more so. So what do you suppose it means for the Apostle to say that God is _especially_ (more so) the savior of the believers?
@deeveevideos
@deeveevideos Жыл бұрын
@@thomasburke9060 what is the difference then? What does salvation look like for unbelievers vs believers. Would it upset you if all are saved? Are you like Jonah?
@thomasburke9060
@thomasburke9060 Жыл бұрын
​@@deeveevideos Not at all. I have more trouble conceiving of the opposite, that some will be lost forever. Nevertheless, I seek to uncover the truth, regardless of whether it fits neatly with my sensibilities.
@jakehibbard5409
@jakehibbard5409 8 ай бұрын
Love it!
@bouseuxlatache4140
@bouseuxlatache4140 2 жыл бұрын
St Anthanasius in the 4th in "On the Incarnation" talks about the original sin. And he was not inventing anything at that time.
@GerardPerry
@GerardPerry 2 жыл бұрын
The Rohr article is so dumb. Did he miss Leviticus 17, i.e. "For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul." Or Paul's description of Jesus as the second Adam?
@---wp3oc
@---wp3oc 2 жыл бұрын
@@GerardPerry The traditional view of original sin isn't as well supported as you might think. Paul only speaks that death (likely spiritual death) spread to all men, but he does not say that humans inherit the sin or guilt of Adam.
@matthewkopp2391
@matthewkopp2391 Жыл бұрын
@@---wp3oc Original sin comes from St. Augustine, I think the earlier idea was simply exile from Eden and exile from God. And that would be consistent with Jewish Belief. I am not an expert on Jewish doctrine, but Martin Buber actually uses the idea of coming out of exile all the time as a personal spiritual event. But the metaphor I think has psychological truth in that when we gain knowledge of good and evil, we exile ourselves from the bliss of Eden, innocent childhood bliss and then engage in the hardship of the world. 22 Then the Lord God said, “Behold, the man has become like one of us in knowing good and evil. Now, lest he reach out his hand and take also of the tree of life and eat, and live forever-” Eating from the second tree is gaining eternal life. It is return to the Eden state but with knowledge of the temporal state of being in time. But this second fruit which some Christians say is Jesus, would be a Jesus of paradoxical atonement. The coming together of what was once understood as opposites is now one. Jesus is Man and God in one who is separated from God and returns to God. The issue with sin is that it maintains the illusion that we are separated from God. Because sin is ignorance of ourselves our actions and the world. But this gets clearer with Jesus as Logos. Logos is reason and ethical discernment and the divine order. If Logos is the anecdote to ignorance, reason is the anecdote to ignorance. Remember both Socrates and Jesus are put on trial for heresy. The Socratic Logos emphasizes deductive reason, Aristotle Logos is ethical discernment, but to have an ethic you need values: they were Prudence, Temperance, Courage, Justice. Christ Logos is Love. Sn ethics of Love. Lack of Love is Separation from oneself, from each other, from God. It is a sin not to love, because not to love separates us from our self, each other, and God. And being another idea of Logos is the divine order of the world it separates us from that too. John 13:34-35 “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.”
@wendyleeconnelly2939
@wendyleeconnelly2939 2 жыл бұрын
good information
@musicalintentions
@musicalintentions 2 жыл бұрын
fascinating!
@sagadiablo
@sagadiablo 2 жыл бұрын
"Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it."
@greggmillay
@greggmillay 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you. I was wondering if someone would share this verse.
@michaelharding6775
@michaelharding6775 2 жыл бұрын
We are ALL destroyed and we are ALL restored. For as in Adam ALL die, so in Christ ALL will be made alive. Proof texting vs by vs is a fruitless effort anyway, Because the Bible is a library of differing points of view. It doesn’t speak with a single unified POV. Even Gen 1 and Gen 2 have irreconcilable differences.
@jeffsaunders4812
@jeffsaunders4812 2 ай бұрын
That verse is talking about our time in the mortal body not afterlife.
@toranshaw4029
@toranshaw4029 2 жыл бұрын
This sounds like another group that I could potentially join, if I were living in America!
@albertito77
@albertito77 2 жыл бұрын
I love the thumbnail!
@adamkotter6174
@adamkotter6174 Жыл бұрын
I really appreciate the idea that God also inspires and works through non-Christians and that non-Christians will also have a chance to be saved. However, I'm wary of the idea that universalism seems to posit that there's no penalty for sin. This seems to me like a theological license to do whatever you want, even if it's harmful to one's self or others, without fear of repercussion.
@SpriteGuard
@SpriteGuard Жыл бұрын
"even if it's harmful" and "without repercussion" seems like a contradiction to me. As a Universalist, I see plenty of need for morality still here on earth with us, in every human interaction. And if you've ever had to apologize to someone who you knew would forgive you, well, you know how much you'll still squirm. Simply knowing we'll be forgiven doesn't lessen the embarrassment of having messed up, and it's not something any of us want to face. We just don't believe that we'll be tortured eternally or utterly obliterated from existence for it. There's still plenty of consequences, just not, as Fred Clark put it, "the worst possible ending for the majority of people who ever lived."
@adamkotter6174
@adamkotter6174 Жыл бұрын
​@@SpriteGuard Gotcha. I guess my issue isn't with Universalism itself so much as with how some people might interpret or misinterpret it. For context, I'm a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. We have a theology that is surprisingly similar to that of Universalism. We believe that, except for a very small few who know God personally and then decide to reject Him, who "crucif[y] him unto themselves and put him to an open shame," literally everyone will eventually be saved. The unrepentant will have to suffer the penalty of their own sins without Christ's intercession, but even that, terrible though it will be, is ultimately finite. We believe that Christ "saves all the works of his hands, except those sons of perdition who deny the Son after the Father has revealed him." There's a passage in the Book of Mormon that reads like this: "And there shall also be many which shall say: Eat, drink, and be merry; nevertheless, fear God-he will justify in committing a little sin; yea, lie a little, take the advantage of one because of his words, dig a pit for thy neighbor; there is no harm in this; and do all these things, for tomorrow we die; and if it so be that we are guilty, God will beat us with a few stripes, and at last we shall be saved in the kingdom of God. Yea, and there shall be many which shall teach after this manner, false and vain and foolish doctrines, and shall be puffed up in their hearts, and shall seek deep to hide their counsels from the Lord; and their works shall be in the dark." I'm not worried about people who choose to wholeheartedly love and serve God, who choose to repent when they recognize that they've done wrong by God, while believing that all will ultimately be forgiven. Goodness knows that my theology is plenty heterodox for most of Christendom. I'm worried about people who forget Christ's message of repentance and jump straight into "Eat, drink, and be merry... He will justify in committing a little sin." That mentality, that abuse of Universalism, causes harm. I'm particularly worried about the attitude that can be embodied by the statement "outdated and restrictive doctrinal baggage," which to me feels like a cousin to "unpopular and inconvenient." There are certainly old commandments that technically fall into this category, like Levitical law fulfilled by Jesus's sacrifice, and the final line between currently applicable and no-longer applicable is interpreted differently by different groups. My worry is that the attitude embodied by the statement can lead many to believe that spiritually destructive practices (e.g., sexual permissiveness) are harmless because they're popular or politically correct. I don't want people to believe that sin is harmless if it's commonly accepted.
@SpriteGuard
@SpriteGuard Жыл бұрын
@@adamkotter6174 I can't speak for Universalists as a whole on this last matter, but I believe that "sexual permissiveness" is not "spiritually destructive", certainly no more so than purity culture, which leads to shame, repression, and self-loathing. I've seen people driven away from God by the belief that one of the most fundamental aspects of human existence makes them worthy of hatred. And for this next bit, I need to express again that I speak only out of my own experience, having asked god boldly and with an open heart, and this is my own finding, not any doctrine: I believe that God grows and changes too. Look at us, look at the world, there isn't a single thing, living or dead, that does not change. Look at the genocides of Sodom, Amalek, and Canaan, and the love and forgiveness of Christ, and tell me that's not growth and change. I believe that God is still growing, still changing, and still learning how best to love and support us. Just like our parents. Just like us.
@adamkotter6174
@adamkotter6174 Жыл бұрын
@@SpriteGuard I can respect that viewpoint, even if I don't agree with it entirely. I've certainly seen people swing too far into purity culture and suffer needlessly as a result. Honestly, I'm still trying to find that middle ground of having a healthy attitude about sexuality that brings me closer to rather than farther from God.
@shamrock1961
@shamrock1961 2 жыл бұрын
Have you considered unbuttoning your top button? You would look more relaxed. Just sayin
@MattheMatthew
@MattheMatthew 2 жыл бұрын
We live by faith. We don’t empirically know what comes next.
@emilybach
@emilybach 2 жыл бұрын
Live by faith in what exactly? You can't have faith in nothing, so what do you have faith in?
@jgeph2.4
@jgeph2.4 2 жыл бұрын
You summarize we live by faith which we get from scripture yet you reject what scripture says comes next .. buffet theology is damning because it concludes you don’t actually have faith in what God has said .
@__seeker__
@__seeker__ 2 жыл бұрын
Have you done a video on Unitarianism? It’s so sad that it doesn’t exist anymore in the US, after it’s tremendously unfortunate merger with the Universalist church.
@potatoheadpokemario1931
@potatoheadpokemario1931 6 ай бұрын
Theologically liberal churches tends not to last
@AquaticDot
@AquaticDot 2 жыл бұрын
The universalist position maximizes the meaningfulness of Jesus' sacrifice, saying that Jesus died for everyone, not just those who believed. Indeed, it's those who reject universalism that trivialize the crucifixion. If we agree God is sovereign over all, which you must if you believe God is omnipotent and omniscient, then all that He wills will be done. And what does he will? 1 Timothy 2 tells us that God wants every person saved and everyone made aware of the Truth of the cross. Isn't that already sufficient to show that, even if we don't know the exact mechanics how, God's ultimate desire is to bring us His truth and His light, and, as God is sovereign in all ways, Thy will be done? After all, as it says in Psalm 135:6 (KJV), "Whatsoever the Lord pleased, that did he in heaven, and in earth, in the seas, and all deep places." And what does the Lord please? Paul tells us in 1 Timothy 2:4 (KJV): "For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour; Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth." Peter affirms this in 2 Peter 3:9 (KJV), writing: "The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance." The Prophet Ezekiel showed the unchanging nature of God on the issue, propheting that "Have I any pleasure in the death of the wicked, declares the Lord God, and not rather that he should turn from his way and live?" in Ezekiel 18:23 (KJV). In fact, the Lord our God Himself cried out in sadness over His desire for all to know the Grace of God in Matthew 23:37 (KJV), shouting: "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!" Proverbs 16:4 (KJV) reads: "The LORD hath made all things for himself: yea, even the wicked for the day of evil." Everything has been made according to a plan, by the Divine Planner, and we all fit within that puzzle. Those who profess an eternal hell believe God "made all things for himself" and would DELIBERATELY leave out the nonbelievers? The very same God who, as St. Paul wrote in 1 Timothy 2:4 (KJV), "Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth"? Those who reject universalism need to decide whether they believe God not to be sovereign, which is easily the most untenable position in all of theology, or that God, for some reason (perhaps a measure of cruelty outside of His loving nature?), would neglect HIS VERY OWN DESIRES to save every last man. Theologians keep quibbling with the concept of limited atonement, and continue to reject the obvious, grace-filled, beautiful reality of the situation directly in front of their face. Not just reject it, but spit on it as heresy. Feel free to keep squabbling over the obvious contradiction that is limited atonement with a sovereign God who wills all to be saved. I'll be enjoying a life of spreading the good news: that the Lord our God, Jesus Christ, the messiah, King of Kings, has gifted us with His grace; as Paul notes in 2 Corinthians 5:15 (KJV), "And he died for all, that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto him which died for them, and rose again."
@schedelworld
@schedelworld 11 ай бұрын
I had hoped that such a group existed-- the views they expressed in these quotes are so similar to where I've ended up in my faith in many ways that it's almost scary. Looking into getting involved-- thank you for the great information, as always! Love your videos.
@anotherperson2627
@anotherperson2627 9 ай бұрын
Yeah same I recently wanted to try going to a Unitarian Universalist but felt they were more of a community center than a church which isn't a bad thing but wasnt what I was looking for
@Metarig
@Metarig 9 ай бұрын
I identify as a universalist, but I was surprised to learn that their views on the Trinity and homosexuality are not as strong as I had hoped, which was somewhat disappointing to me.
@potatoheadpokemario1931
@potatoheadpokemario1931 6 ай бұрын
​@@Metarigshould be expected that those who believe no matter how evil and how badly you corrupted teachings you'll get into heaven will be evil and corrupt teachings
@potatoheadpokemario1931
@potatoheadpokemario1931 6 ай бұрын
It's because you don't wish to summit to Jesus's words
@schedelworld
@schedelworld 6 ай бұрын
@potatoheadpokemario1931 please enlighten me, which specific words are you talking about? And what specific part of my life are you referring to, since you seem to believe you're capable of judging me without knowing me at all? Matthew 7:1-2 comes to mind as a passage that you might find useful; I'm assuming you haven't read it.
@justinfiorenzio7112
@justinfiorenzio7112 Жыл бұрын
Please do a video on Watchman Nee & the Local church movement/ Chinese House Church movement
@chasethesnakee
@chasethesnakee 2 жыл бұрын
You should do Unitarian Universalism too!
@polemeros
@polemeros 2 жыл бұрын
They are in no meaningful sense a Christian denomination and do not claim to be. They are nothing but a thin churchy-like veneer over deeply leftwing progressive politics. They are the UnChurch of Woke. He may as well do a video on Marxists.
@grangermontag1824
@grangermontag1824 2 жыл бұрын
@@polemeros True, but their history is interesting and influential in America
@polemeros
@polemeros 2 жыл бұрын
@@grangermontag1824 True, but Ready To Harvest is about Christian denominations.
@polemeros
@polemeros 2 жыл бұрын
@@grangermontag1824 if he wanted an example of what inevitably happens when Christian churches go liberal, then that would be interesting but his self announced goal is to report neutrally.
@thursoberwick1948
@thursoberwick1948 2 жыл бұрын
@@polemeros The UU is vaguely Christian. I think like the Quakers they have genuine Christian roots, but some elements have wandered away from it.
@nomore9004
@nomore9004 2 жыл бұрын
Do a video comparing Eastern Christianity and Western Christianity.
@DAsiebert
@DAsiebert Жыл бұрын
Yes
@ryankohnenkamp8946
@ryankohnenkamp8946 2 жыл бұрын
0:42 Kinda missed an opportunity to call themselves the W's...
@rustyshackelford3590
@rustyshackelford3590 2 жыл бұрын
Isn’t it weird that the letter W is called double U but it looks like a double V
@0xva
@0xva 2 жыл бұрын
@@rustyshackelford3590 In spanish it's called double v, lol.
@DiamondKingStudios
@DiamondKingStudios 2 жыл бұрын
@@rustyshackelford3590 from what I heard it evolved to look like "vv" over time but originally in the English language was just two "u"s put together, like uuhat I show here.
@allegoria07
@allegoria07 2 жыл бұрын
?
@EcclesiastesLiker-py5ts
@EcclesiastesLiker-py5ts Жыл бұрын
@@allegoria07 The have a double helping of the letter U, so they could be called the W s.
@jec1ny
@jec1ny Жыл бұрын
In Orthodoxy there is a tradition among the Fathers and many saints of praying for the salvation of all. But that is quite different from actually believing that such will come to pass. Alas, the belief (apokatastasis) was condemned as heresy by the Fifth Oecumnical Council in AD 553.
@janeandrews6426
@janeandrews6426 2 жыл бұрын
Oh wow! This is a church I could actually get behind!
@communityuniversalistchurch
@communityuniversalistchurch 2 жыл бұрын
Come check us out. Our congregation worships online.
@serpentsepia6638
@serpentsepia6638 Жыл бұрын
What Richard Rohr says is correct about Augustine of Hippo and the doctrine of original sin, but he deceives by insinuating that the very notion of original sin was derived in the 5th century when, in fact, it was the debate on the clarification of original sin that came into focus. If you refer to yourselves as Christians then you must accept that Jesus died on the cross for the sins of mankind and was resurrected. Even though the Jewish people don't believe in original sin, they still believe in the Torah and the story of Adam and Eve. The Jewish people believe that we are not perfect and humans are fallible and that Jewish scriptures are a product of fallible human minds. I also want to add that the concept that we can all be related to Adam and Eve isn't so far-fetched. Scientists in the Russian Academy of Sciences estimated Genghis Khan has 16 million male descendants living in Central Asia in 2003. About 1 in 200 people today are estimated to be descendants of Genghis Khan. Psalm 51:5, "I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me". 6th century B.C. Romans 5:12 "Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned." Added to the Bible in the 4th century. Jesus said "I am the way, the truth and the life. The only way to God is through me". John 14:6 That quote alone goes against the very foundation of UU/CUA church. "If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. If we say we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us." John 1:8-10 Added in 1st century A.D. The Eastern Orthodox and Byzantine Rite Eastern Catholic Churches' version of original sin is the view that sin originates with the Devil, "for the devil sins from the beginning (1 John iii. 8)" Ezekiel 18:4 "Behold, all souls are mine; the soul of the father as well as the soul of the son is mine: the soul who sins shall die." Isaiah 59:2 "but your iniquities have made a separation between you and your God, and your sins have hidden his face from you so that he does not hear." Job 15:14 "What is man, that he can be pure? Or he who is born of a woman, that he can be righteous?"
@thomasburke9060
@thomasburke9060 Жыл бұрын
The doctrine of original sin doesn't require that the characters of Adam and Eve represent specific historical individuals. Even if they are figures representing the first humans, it's still a story telling us how the first humans, whom we're obviously all descended from, fell into sin.
@zelenisok
@zelenisok 2 жыл бұрын
As Jesus said - everyone will be salted (ie preserved) by fire. For those unprepared for that purgation it will take long to go through it, and the experience will be painful, thats 'hell'.
@grangermontag1824
@grangermontag1824 2 жыл бұрын
Perserved, yes. But in what kind of state?
@zelenisok
@zelenisok 2 жыл бұрын
Saved state. Jesus came not to judge but to save. Note that everyone will pass through the fire. Both goats and sheep. So it doesnt refer to fire of punishment, but fire of purification. But for the goats it will feel like punishment. Also the words Jesus and Paul used for punishment was chastisment, meaning punishing to correct the punished. Look up the Greek words kolasis and timoria, the latter word, which strictly means punishment, is never used, only kolasis - chastisment, remedial punishment, rehabilitative punishment.
@communityuniversalistchurch
@communityuniversalistchurch 2 жыл бұрын
@@zelenisok Yes, this is exactly what I believe as well.
@falleneldor
@falleneldor 2 жыл бұрын
So Adolf and Atilla the hun, and the cult leaders who rape and murder even children before sacrificing them to satan. Those who are openly agaisnt thier creator, defile the world. They get a pass after some purification ritual Jesus never once mentions? Jesus warns of hell, and damnation and "the judgement" more then anything else. He warned that wide is the gate that lead to suffering, and narrow is the path that leads to salvation..
@zelenisok
@zelenisok 2 жыл бұрын
No one gets a pass. They will get a just punishment. I literally quoted Jesus mentioning the purification (ie the universal "salting"). And I did say that hell exists, that will be the experience of bad people that they will have when passing through the purification. Damn, you infernalists are dedicated to obfuscating things.
@davidstout6051
@davidstout6051 2 жыл бұрын
Orthodoxy also has a leaning towards universalism. See David Bentley Hart’s book on the topic. Kudos for fairly representing a position that is very different from your own. You’re a class act. As a comment on the liberal tendency to present a non-messianic figure, this is not a position with historical support. A simply prophetic Jesus is a modern creation. For the ancients Jesus was either messiah or false. Note that I am not precluding adoption is here which was an option, but that position still entailed a supernatural dimension.
@philipkeller4936
@philipkeller4936 2 жыл бұрын
Gregory of Nyssa…. And Other Greek speaking patristics were also universalists. The position from an exegetical standpoint is handled quite well by Thomas Talbott in his book, “The Inescable Love of God.” I have been reading David Bentley Hart during the pandemic. His work Is fantastic, so thorough.
@PeterM8987
@PeterM8987 2 жыл бұрын
No it doesn't.
@allegoria07
@allegoria07 2 жыл бұрын
@@PeterM8987 Gregory of Nyssa is Called father of fathers and revered in all main denominations: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregory_of_Nyssa
@josephstalin8337
@josephstalin8337 Жыл бұрын
No it doesnt
@WarmPotato
@WarmPotato 2 жыл бұрын
6:30 - That I can see
@Metarig
@Metarig 9 ай бұрын
I'm a Universalist, which basically means I don't think hell is eternal. It's not considered a heretical belief, and even the Catholic Church is open to the idea of universal salvation. But when it comes to accepting homosexuality and denying the Trinity, those ideas definitely stray from traditional Christian teachings.
@aaronmoore5322
@aaronmoore5322 2 жыл бұрын
Richard Rohr is actually a Catholic priest. As I commented in Joshua's previous video about the Baptist church that baptized an infant, "I am Catholic, and we have the same phenomenon at work: people (e.g. politicians) wearing the label without personally embracing some of our core teachings." I probably should have included "clergy" along with politicians.
@serpentsepia6638
@serpentsepia6638 Жыл бұрын
The problem with Richard Rohr is that he's attempting to appeal to popular culture and a secularist society by using half truths. The reason why the Catholic church hasn't changed its position since the Council of Nicaea is because it adheres to the original teachings of Jesus Christ. "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." John 14:6
@mitromney
@mitromney 10 ай бұрын
Universalism is one of those teachings I can never understand. So many CLEAR, TRANSPARENT passages about hell. So many warnings about being cast into darkness. Thrown into lake of fire. Cut of from the branch. Being rejected by the returning King. Being thrown away from the feast. And so on, and so forth. I simply can not understand how, or why, would anybody want to call themselves Christians, if they are not willing to take seriously things Jesus repeated and taught this clearly and frequently, so many, many times throughout the Scripture. I understand that there are some major differences between Christians. But they always have to do with theological mechanics of how exactly are spiritual things working. What does it exactly mean that "this" is the body of Christ? What does is exactly mean that "those Jesus received, he will never lose"? What does it mean to be "saved by baptism"? Tricky things, all around, even though they are concerning fundamental doctrines of Christianity. But THIS? That's not a vague passage right there folks. That's not even a handful of vague passages. That's half the Bible you're discarding if you think there is no damnation for enemies of God. Since the fall in Genesis, all the way to the lake of fire in Revelation, the whole Bible is all about that. I just don't get it. I understand the DESIRE people have for the Bible to teach this. But it just doesn't. And it couldn't NOT teach it any clearer, I don't even know how it could.
@TheMashiachsfollower
@TheMashiachsfollower 2 жыл бұрын
There is the view that God loses most of mankind in a "hell" (The Parables of Jesus and prophecies in the Bible intrepreted literally, thus not entirely correctly so) for all the ages/aeons without hope, help or healing. that God, although all knowing and all mighty, will either fail in his plan to draw all mankind back unto Himself through Yahushua (Jesus), or that His plan of salvation is depentant on our side to make the right choice - thus the doctrine of free will - declaring that man's will would be stronger and more important than God's will. Then there is the view that God's victory and parentship is supreme, universal and encompass all things. That God will win all mankind from sin and "Hell"/"The grave"/"the State of death" - The parables of Yahushua and the prophecies in the Bible is in interpretation upon the foundation that God will repay us according to our deeds that yes there is punishment and concequence of sin without repentance. But God does not cast of forever nor does he burn up our bodies and souls in a literal hell-furnace like unto dante's inferno - rather punishment serves to correct us of our wrongs and make us repent to YAHUSHUA) That God's will always wins - thus we cannot do ANYTHING without Him approving according to the plan of His will. Depenting on your own understanding of the Bible - one or another of the above two views on the Gospel will make more sence unto you and both views can present arguments for their case. But to know which side has the arguments that truly are Bible-based and from above, and to know just how to read and interpret the Bible correctly - we need to know and realize foundational truths that cannot be denied by either views; such as; GOD IS HOLY - meaning God is perfect in His ways (anything unholy is opposite of His Set-apart character) GOD IS ALL-MIGHTY AND ALL-KNOWING - Meaning God's wisdom, power and holy presence is infinite/not limited and many other truths. Then we have this foundational truth; GOD IS LOVE. God reveal Himself not only as loving - although he indeed is loving - but He revealed himself as LOVE ITSELF. Now, not all "love" that is in existence is of God. For example; to love evil (sin) is definetly not of God, since it goes against the "GOD IS HOLY" foundational truth. But the Bible gives a good Sermon on the aspects/attributes of love: 4 Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. 5 It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. 6 Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. 7 It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres. 8 Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where there is knowledge, it will pass away. 9 For we know in part and we prophesy in part, 10 but when completeness comes, what is in part disappears. 11 When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me. 12 For now we see only a reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known. 13 And now these three remain: faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love." - 1 Corinthians 13:4-13 So reading the above attributes of God's love, His love for all mankind, a love that always protects always trusts and always perseveres/endures and never fails. I dearly hope you realize and embrace - in the path of being a follower of Yahushua - the wisdom that all the attributes of God's holy character is best presented in the Biblical view of #apokatastasis (restoration of all things), and the belief that all things are given, all will be drawn and will come to and embrace Yahushua For From Him as genesis and through Him as The Way and unto Him as the Revelation of Ending are all things. To him be the glory forever. Amen.
@jeskerjames3260
@jeskerjames3260 Жыл бұрын
Very Well Put! Enjoyed reading this!
@whitebeardInn
@whitebeardInn 11 ай бұрын
Thanks for this video! I'm a Conditionalist but would love for Christian Universalism (CU) to be correct, although I don't see that in the Bible. The articles I've read and videos I've watched on CU haven't mentioned any of the heretical beliefs of this organization. I'm wondering if they represent all of the CU community? I've read/watched Gregory MacDonald and David Bentley Hart (not everything of course) and didn't see these heretical beliefs in their writings. Must one believe all the nonsense that the CUA spitting out to be a CU?
@susannemackenzie8469
@susannemackenzie8469 10 ай бұрын
No, you only have to believe in universal reconciliation. I still believe in the Nicene Creed, and I still believe in hell, I just don't believe hell is eternal.
@grangermontag1824
@grangermontag1824 2 жыл бұрын
CUA: you're totally awesome just the way you are. And everything wrong about you will be automatically sorted out. Wanna come to our church and learn about Jesus? Average person: why?
@andrewjohnson8232
@andrewjohnson8232 2 жыл бұрын
Christ commanded that we forgive our enemies. By your reasoning, shouldn't you ask: Why? They're going to burn for eternity.
@grangermontag1824
@grangermontag1824 2 жыл бұрын
@@andrewjohnson8232 Uh no. Loving/ forgiving our enemies means we truly hope they repent. But sometimes things don't go the way we hope. It's not loving to ignore the reality of who people choose to be and pretend everything's alright.
@andrewjohnson8232
@andrewjohnson8232 2 жыл бұрын
@@grangermontag1824 If a person repents, they are no longer an enemy. I can hope that a person repents while feeling indifferent towards them, or even contemptuous of them. But The Cross is neither indifferent, nor contemptuous. If we are satisfied to see the unrepentent condemned to eternal torture, can we claim ever to have truly loved them? Would it not be more accurate to say that we had merely hoped for them to become worthy of love? At what point does loving the unrepentent become wrong and rejection of them become right? How could it ever be right to care for the unrepentent, if it is ultimately right to reject them?
@grangermontag1824
@grangermontag1824 2 жыл бұрын
@@andrewjohnson8232 By your logic it doesn't matter whether we truly love our enemies since all will be worked out in the end. So why try to convince me or anyone of anything?
@andrewjohnson8232
@andrewjohnson8232 2 жыл бұрын
@@grangermontag1824 That's an important question. I would ask: Is the Christian one who accepts the Gospel? Or one who invests in the Gospel to obtain a dividend? Love is The End, not a means to an end. You write that it will all work out in end as though that would diminish The Word to a mere trifle. Could anything more profound and perfect be said about Creation and the Will of God? Would it dissapoint you as a Christian to know that God has "reconciled all things... making peace... through the blood of his Cross"? Colossians 1:20. If so, why? Would the Gospel become meaningless and useless to you if you believed that "...in Christ all are made alive"? Corinthians 15:22. Would you then turn to hatred, violence, desecration and blasphemy? "How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?" Romans 6:2. We love because we are loved: John 4:19. Is there something greater that you would be missing out on, or deprived of, if, the trials of history are to end in this ultimate and absolute truth?
@BelieveOnlyJesus
@BelieveOnlyJesus 2 жыл бұрын
Mark 9:48. Jesus speaking : “…47And if your eye causes you to sin, pluck it out. It is better for you to enter the kingdom of God with one eye than to have two eyes and be thrown into hell, 48where ‘their worm never dies, and the fire is never quenched.’ 49For everyone will be salted with fire.…”.
@BirdDogey1
@BirdDogey1 2 жыл бұрын
I wonder why the CUA uses the cross in their logo?
@allegoria07
@allegoria07 2 жыл бұрын
Because they are a Christian organisation 🤔?
@BirdDogey1
@BirdDogey1 2 жыл бұрын
@@allegoria07 By their own admission they don't hold to any of the historic creeds that have defined Christianity ie Apostles, Nicene and Athanasian.
@johnsundet3926
@johnsundet3926 Жыл бұрын
Do you see the Bible as God's holy word or just a good information book with ideas worth thinking about?
@mattyounts9400
@mattyounts9400 2 жыл бұрын
What must I do to be saved?
@donew1thita11
@donew1thita11 2 жыл бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ldKWddx83byneWQ.html
@zombie.hunter.314
@zombie.hunter.314 11 ай бұрын
It's very interesting to watch this as a UU bc I definitely see the roots with the focus on truth from many sources.
@kirin347
@kirin347 Жыл бұрын
Dang. Thought this might be Evangelical Universalism, but it's liberal universalism still. Good to know.
@thomasburke9060
@thomasburke9060 Жыл бұрын
What's the difference?
@kirin347
@kirin347 Жыл бұрын
1. The CUA is Socially Progressive, and they adapt their theology to fit this view. They are also anti-Nicene, rejecting Trinitarian Monotheism. 2. At 5:20 the CUA is quoted saying all religions lead to heaven if the person is 'good'. An EU would instead insist that such a person will eventually be Reconciled to God the Trinity after death in Hades or Gehenna DESPITE whatever they believed in life. They will be corrected and accept Christ Jesus after death. Evangelical Universalism is some type of Conservative Nicene Christianity with only Hell being adjusted. That said, many of their complaints against Infernalist and Annihilationist churches are valid. It is difficult for a Conservative or 'Evangelical' Universalist to find a home anywhere.
@kirin347
@kirin347 Жыл бұрын
I updated my response after re-watching the video, as it has been a while.
@Bill-dj9hv
@Bill-dj9hv 9 ай бұрын
God created a hell where people will burn and suffer forever because he loves us.
@blue62show
@blue62show 8 ай бұрын
Scripture says that man is made in the image of God, that is with these characteristics which are eternal i.e life, free will, hope, faith, love. If this is true, has God made a heart of man in his image that will not love? Jesus, through whom all exist, who is there in the beginning and hovered over the deep, speaking into form with his command, who changed water into wine, and who walked upon the sea and calmed it with his words, does he not move the hearts of kings like rivers? The great command is to love God and neighbor, because this is what will be fulfilled, the answer to Jesus's prayer that we be one, one in whom and to whom all men are drawn, repenting by the goodness of God, as if salted with tongues of fire of a consummate Lord, renewing the spirit of the mind and enlightening the heart, and buy the holy Spirit every tongue praising that Jesus is Lord. So it can be possibly understood in scripture that it is not God's will that men perish, nor is it his delight, but it is His will that all come to know him, just as the Lord gave us to pray, "Thy will be done". God willing, all men will be saved, willingly, according to how the heart is made.
@jstube36
@jstube36 2 жыл бұрын
I would think If God is the one judge of all humanity, it matters little what somebody chooses to call themselves. We put too much emphasis on these pointless labels. It's still possible that more than one " Heaven " exists. Maybe more than just one eternal judge of humanity. It's like looking at a painting without knowing the artist. It could be more than one. Such is with what happens after death. There is no proven way to be certain which collection of religious tales are actually true.
@OperationReapSinners777
@OperationReapSinners777 9 ай бұрын
Luk 13:23 Then said one unto him, Lord, are there few that be saved? And he said unto them,Luk 13:24 Strive to enter in at the strait gate: for many, I say unto you, will seek to enter in, and shall not be able.Luk 13:25 When once the master of the house is risen up, and hath shut to the door, and ye begin to stand without, and to knock at the door, saying, Lord, Lord, open unto us; and he shall answer and say unto you, I know you not whence ye are:Luk 13:26 Then shall ye begin to say, We have eaten and drunk in thy presence, and thou hast taught in our streets.Luk 13:27 But he shall say, I tell you, I know you not whence ye are; depart from me, all ye workers of iniquity.Luk 13:28 There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth, when ye shall see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all the prophets, in the kingdom of God, and you yourselves thrust out. 2Co 11:13 For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. 2Co 11:14 And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. 2Co 11:15 Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works. Universalism is the biggest lie manufactured by the Devil!God gives people a clear choice to accept the offer of salvation or face annihilation! These verses mean that there will be very serious consequences, that's if people don't take the offer of salvation! V Rev 3:19 As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent.Rev 3:20 Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me.Rev 3:21 To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne. Mar 8:34 And when he had called the people unto him with his disciples also, he said unto them, Whosoever will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.Mar 8:35 For whosoever will save his life shall lose it; but whosoever shall lose his life for my sake and the gospel's, the same shall save it. Mar 8:36 For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?Mar 8:37 Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?Mar 8:38 Whosoever therefore shall be ashamed of me and of my words in this adulterous and sinful generation; of him also shall the Son of man be ashamed, when he cometh in the glory of his Father with the holy angels. 1Th 5:1 But of the times and the seasons, brethren, ye have no need that I write unto you.1Th 5:2 For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night. 1Th 5:3 For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape. 1Th 5:4 But ye, brethren, are not in darkness, that that day should overtake you as a thief. 1Th 5:5 Ye are all the children of light, and the children of the day: we are not of the night, nor of darkness. 1Th 5:6 Therefore let us not sleep, as do others; but let us watch and be sober.1Th 5:7 For they that sleep sleep in the night; and they that be drunken are drunken in the night.1Th 5:8 But let us, who are of the day, be sober, putting on the breastplate of faith and love; and for an helmet, the hope of salvation. Heb 12:25 See that ye refuse not him that speaketh. For if they escaped not who refused him that spake on earth, much more shall not we escape, if we turn away from him that speaketh from heaven:Heb 12:26 Whose voice then shook the earth: but now he hath promised, saying, Yet once more I shake not the earth only, but also heaven.Heb 12:27 And this word, Yet once more, signifieth the removing of those things that are shaken, as of things that are made, that those things which cannot be shaken may remain.Heb 12:28 Wherefore we receiving a kingdom which cannot be moved, let us have grace, whereby we may serve God acceptably with reverence and godly fear:Heb 12:29 For our God is a consuming fire. 1Pe 4:14 If ye be reproached for the name of Christ, happy are ye; for the spirit of glory and of God resteth upon you: on their part he is evil spoken of, but on your part he is glorified. 1Pe 4:15 But let none of you suffer as a murderer, or as a thief, or as an evildoer, or as a busybody in other men's matters. 1Pe 4:16 Yet if any man suffer as a Christian, let him not be ashamed; but let him glorify God on this behalf. 1Pe 4:17 For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God?1Pe 4:18 And if the righteous scarcely be saved, where shall the ungodly and the sinner appear?1Pe 4:19 Wherefore let them that suffer according to the will of God commit the keeping of their souls to him in well doing, as unto a faithful Creator. 2Pe 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.2Pe 3:11 Seeing then that all these things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be in all holy conversation and godliness, 2Pe 3:12 Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat? 2Pe 3:13 Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness. 2Pe 3:14 Wherefore, beloved, seeing that ye look for such things, be diligent that ye may be found of him in peace, without spot, and blameless. Rom 2:5 But after thy hardness and impenitent heart treasurest up unto thyself wrath against the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God;Rom 2:6 Who will render to every man according to his deeds:Rom 2:7 To them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honour and immortality, eternal life:Rom 2:8 But unto them that are contentious, and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, indignation and wrath, Rom 2:9 Tribulation and anguish, upon every soul of man that doeth evil, of the Jew first, and also of the Gentile;Rom 2:10 But glory, honour, and peace, to every man that worketh good, to the Jew first, and also to the Gentile: Rom 2:11 For there is no respect of persons with God. Rom 2:12 For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without law: and as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law;Rom 2:13 For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified.
@bootmender
@bootmender 2 жыл бұрын
Judaism?
@gottenspider2057
@gottenspider2057 2 жыл бұрын
How you’re able to read all that with a straight face is impressive
@profitglen
@profitglen Ай бұрын
There is no way that eternal conscious torment is true... even if God does exist. BTW, IF I were to ever identity as a Christian, it certainly would be a Christian Universalist! In fact, I wouldn't be the slightest bit offended if one were to label me that. Because for a religion, it is the most beautiful one! ;)
@pixieburton3131
@pixieburton3131 2 жыл бұрын
Ugh. Ten churches listed and one is also found in the CBF. 😢
@Jeroen4
@Jeroen4 Ай бұрын
I will never understand this mindset of just taking scripture of whatever religion suits you, only believing the parts that suit you and adding on whatever you like. Sounds more like believing yourself rather than believing in God
@edsand9498
@edsand9498 3 күн бұрын
indeed, this is how particularists view the Bible, they do not see the historical, theological, or metaphorical context
@efandmk3382
@efandmk3382 2 жыл бұрын
A Universal Christian Church has existed for nearly 2000 years. It's called Roman Catholicism. Ultimately, it is about having lived the life that Jesus prescribed his followers to live. Love God. Be of service to your fellow man. It really is as simple as that. The human tendency to over complicate things, has led to some really vulgar versions of Christianity. 'Once saved, always saved", "saved by faith alone" and "prosperity gospel" immediately come to mind. There are many others. There are many Jesus-like people out there who are non believers. We hope for their salvation, but that is up to God.
@derekroberts6654
@derekroberts6654 2 жыл бұрын
ive been to Southern Baptists churches my whole life but subconscly drawn to this belief system... s... in a way there was and maybe still is conflict in me. especily now as i am seeing more fundamently and, )im gonna say it) downright hatefull donimonations under the guise of "baptists" seem to sprout up...
@---wp3oc
@---wp3oc 2 жыл бұрын
First of all, it shouldn't come as a surprise. The Southern Baptists emerged because the Baptists in the South supported their "God-given right to owning slaves" while the Baptists in the North supported abolition. After the war they were adamant in opposing civil rights legislation supporting white supremacy. Universalism is certainly attractive but I'd recommend looking into more theologically orthodox varieties of universalism, such as ones that do believe in the Trinity and reject inclusivism (belief that all religions lead to heaven), but instead believe that all souls in hell will eventually repent and be reconciled to the Kingdom of God.
@andrewjohnson8232
@andrewjohnson8232 2 жыл бұрын
As a believer myself, I don't see how any Christian could not be drawn to universalism. For me, the reactionary rejection of the proposition is incompatible with Christian faith. It is an incompatibility that is historically unexceptional; the loudest most strident claims to Christian faith have accompanied the murder of dissidents, the burning of "heretics", a genocidal system of slavery, the adamant dogma that a man is only truly a brother, a woman only truly a sister according to their most inconsequential physical distinctions, the rape of continents, the perpetual humiliation of women, and the adoration of money. I was brought up a Seventh Day Adventist. As a kid I asked: How a mother could be at peace in heaven if her child is in hell? The answers I received were all one or other version of: she will be a less caring person in heaven, than she is as a sinner. I remember one curch elder, still one of the kindest, truest Christian brothers I have ever known, said: it must be that God will erase our memories. So heaven is a brainwashed lie and all of human history an irrelevance? There are only two alternatives, either the destiny of the world is in the hands of humanity, in which case it faces near absolute condemnation, with The Cross provided as an escape route for a few. Or: The Cross is the Absolute statement that the destiny of Creation belongs to the Will of God. In which case, salvation cannot be an insipidly partial game of chance, but must be perfect. Universalism is not more widely accepted in the West, (Eastern Orthodoxy is more accommodating), not because it is incompatible with scripture, but because it is incompatible with the capitalist schemes and misanthropic instincts of the people who dominate most denominations.
@communityuniversalistchurch
@communityuniversalistchurch 2 жыл бұрын
@@---wp3oc Well said. The CUA has folks from both camps (inclusive of other religions and not). The bit in the statement of faith about other prophets is worded that way to allow both interpretations. If someone plans to worship with a CUA church, this would be a good question to ask the minister when checking out the church.
@edwardhill7045
@edwardhill7045 2 жыл бұрын
it doesnt matter what we believe IT MATTERS WHAT GOD SAID
@mysticheathen3455
@mysticheathen3455 2 жыл бұрын
Christian beliefs are based on what we believe God said...
@edwardhill7045
@edwardhill7045 2 жыл бұрын
@@mysticheathen3455 Not really for most even the false ones can find a scripture to back up what they believe .What the problem is they cant recognize what God actually said and the writer is actually saying .Gods word is different from whats written in the bible . MOST READERS THINK THE ENTIRE BIBLE IS THE WORDS OF GOD and thats not reality .For every author writing Gods words will always give God the proper credit for speaking in the text .Separating his own words from Gods word
@edwardhill7045
@edwardhill7045 2 жыл бұрын
@@mysticheathen3455 i will give you a example so you can go back and study what God has said . A PROPHET FROM THE OT WILL SAY . The WORD OF GOD came to me and said : THEN THE WRITER WILL GO ON SAYING WHAT GOD ACTUALLY SAID . Each and every OT prophet will give God full credit when it is God speaking .Most people think that Pauls words are Gods words also AND THATS NOT REALITY for Paul was not a prophet nor did he at any time say that God was speaking through him as did THE OLD TESTAMENT PROPHETS .
@mysticheathen3455
@mysticheathen3455 2 жыл бұрын
@@edwardhill7045 yes, really. It's interpretation of scripture, that's why there are over 2,000 denominations.
@edwardhill7045
@edwardhill7045 2 жыл бұрын
@@mysticheathen3455 God for reasons of his own does not want to destroy Satan yet so we will have to wait until God puts this evil away from us before the church can be fully manifested
@scotthaynes5440
@scotthaynes5440 9 ай бұрын
Good resource to understand orthodox Christian Universalism. Saint Gregory of Nyssa commentary on 1 Corinthians 15:28. Modern resource David Bentley Heart, Eastern Orthodox scholar. His book “that all shall be saved. Ytube channel “the total victory of Christ”.
@RememberGodHolyBible
@RememberGodHolyBible 10 ай бұрын
that's scary.
@PeterM8987
@PeterM8987 2 жыл бұрын
Father Richard Rohr's position is heterodox. His teaching of a so-called Cosmic Christ is a serious distortion of trinitarian doctrine. He also teaches perennialism, and describes God in panentheistic terms, which is diametrically opposed to the Church's doctrinal understanding of God. This means he believes God is in all things and all things are in God. EG. "The universe is the body of God".
@allegoria07
@allegoria07 2 жыл бұрын
What is so heterodox in this position?
@cedk144
@cedk144 Жыл бұрын
I'm Hopefully Universalist of a EvangeliCatholic sort & I would be loathed by them. This sounds like UU with a Jesus varnish.
@kevanhubbard9673
@kevanhubbard9673 Жыл бұрын
Universalists tend to be either pantheists or panentheists and don't see a clear division between the creator and the created.They can't really affirm that Jesus is God as everything is God!
@thomasburke9060
@thomasburke9060 Жыл бұрын
Really? I've never noticed Christian universalists expressing a confusion of God and creatures.
@---wp3oc
@---wp3oc 2 жыл бұрын
Though this video is mainly about this specific association, it does not explain the universalist position very well. It can range from all religions lead to heaven to the belief that hell is temporary, and that all sinful souls will eventually be purified and made right before God in repentance and acceptance of Jesus as Lord.
@tlaloqq
@tlaloqq 2 жыл бұрын
If I remember correctly Judaism preaches this. People who have sinned go to “hell” but it’s temporary. Which to me makes the most sense. A 20 year old kid who dies in a war and wasn’t Christian gets condemned FOR ALL ETERNITY? Literally makes no logical sense especially when the only reason he is here is because of the creator. So to believe anyone goes to hell in the first place is to believe an all knowing, all powerful, being purposefully created a being in his own image to be condemned. Don’t buy it, to me god is all loving as we are his Children. Not sure why some Christians are so vengeful
@fluffysheap
@fluffysheap 2 жыл бұрын
You should really check out Annihilationism. Nobody is condemned to eternal torture, but it is still compatible with Jesus and his teachings of holiness and repentance. More compatible with Scripture than the traditional concept of Hell, in fact. (Example : in John 3:16, "eternal life" means "eternal life" and "perish" means "perish," not "eternal life but it's horrible")
@---wp3oc
@---wp3oc 2 жыл бұрын
​@@tlaloqq I'd thank Augustine who famously or infamously argued that unbaptized babies go to hell.
@---wp3oc
@---wp3oc 2 жыл бұрын
@@fluffysheap I can see the merits of Annihilationism and no doubt it is better than eternal conscious torment, and I'm glad it's becoming more popular.
@bengray423
@bengray423 Жыл бұрын
People need to get back to the BIBLE. JESUS is the WORD OF GOD! Woe to him who ads to or takes away from the BIBLE!
@fluffysheap
@fluffysheap 2 жыл бұрын
I really wanted to be a (theologically, not necessarily a church member) Christian Universalist. But it's just not compatible with the Bible. And it sounds like they're just replaying the UU story. "Christians, but without hell" -> "Some humanism and non-Christian belief is ok" -> "Why bother with Jesus at all?" Plus a big dose of new age "We're just superior to all those old fashioned people who only care about what Jesus actually taught" All people have the right to practice their religion, but, like Paul, I'm forced to ask, are you really even believers? Why not just be atheists, new agers or cultural-only Christians?
@daa589
@daa589 2 жыл бұрын
I can only hope God has mercy on those in hell
@bradyhornstra7510
@bradyhornstra7510 2 жыл бұрын
Christian universalism is actually quite compatible with the Bible and has always had a minority report of subscribers throughout church history. It's pretty easy to make the argument that Paul himself was a universalist.
@daa589
@daa589 2 жыл бұрын
@@bradyhornstra7510 can you share scripture please?
@bradyhornstra7510
@bradyhornstra7510 2 жыл бұрын
@@daa589 God is the savior of all men (1 Timothy 4:10). God will have mercy on all (Romans 11:32). Jesus will justify everyone (Romans 5:15-21). Jesus will draw all people to himself (John 12:32).
@Perririri
@Perririri 2 жыл бұрын
Do they have the #ScoobySnack of Holy Communion?! 🤣
@danlin8662
@danlin8662 2 жыл бұрын
Acts 10:34! *mic drop*
@josephjones4207
@josephjones4207 2 жыл бұрын
Hey do JWs
@grosty2353
@grosty2353 2 жыл бұрын
He has
@jorgelopez-pr6dr
@jorgelopez-pr6dr 2 жыл бұрын
CUA is everything but biblical. A true mishmash of old heresies.
@MichaelServantOfChrist
@MichaelServantOfChrist 10 ай бұрын
Not teaching a child that their sin leads them to Hell is sending your child to Hell. That is real child abuse. I am willing and able to prove the doctrine of eternal Hell to all Universalists. Hell is real, Hell is forever, only those who turn from their sin to obey Christ will be forgiven, and escape the Lake of Fire.
@droe2570
@droe2570 2 жыл бұрын
They just want to deny Christ and steer people away from God. 2 Peter 2: 1 "But false prophets also arose among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing upon themselves swift destruction."
@linjicakonikon7666
@linjicakonikon7666 7 ай бұрын
Apokatastasis! I Timothy 4:10 All means All
@4jgarner
@4jgarner 2 жыл бұрын
It must have been really hard to keep a straight face while filming this.
@thetraditionalist
@thetraditionalist 2 жыл бұрын
Why call yourself a christian if you don't even believe in Christ?
@FriarJoe66
@FriarJoe66 2 жыл бұрын
They explicitly do believe in Christ
@thetraditionalist
@thetraditionalist 2 жыл бұрын
@@FriarJoe66 not as the saviour
@communityuniversalistchurch
@communityuniversalistchurch 2 жыл бұрын
@@thetraditionalist Yes we do.
@thetraditionalist
@thetraditionalist 2 жыл бұрын
@@communityuniversalistchurch no you don't
@potatoheadpokemario1931
@potatoheadpokemario1931 6 ай бұрын
Universalism might me the most anti-christian thing ever. Jesus himself said "I am the way, nobody comes to the father apart from me"
@edsand9498
@edsand9498 3 күн бұрын
at the end, all those through their free will will come to the father through the son, we do not state that you can come to the Lord without Jesus, but that all those will come to Jesus in the end of their own will
@potatoheadpokemario1931
@potatoheadpokemario1931 3 күн бұрын
@@edsand9498 that isn't what the bible teaches
@roqsteady5290
@roqsteady5290 Жыл бұрын
One of the main attractions of Christianity for many is that you are a member of an exclusive club and everyone else gets tortured for eternity. So whilst universalism is a positive force it isn’t likely to become mainstream.
@DecoAoreste
@DecoAoreste 2 жыл бұрын
I am not a universalist, I think hell is real. Nevertheless, there is some truth to what is said at 5:32. I can't imagine that a righteous God would send someone like Gandhi to hell for not believing in Jesus. There must be some kind of special grace non-Christians are able to get under certain circumstances. On the other hand, believing that everyone gets into heaven also seems foolish - a righteous God wouldn't allow Hitler in.
@fluffysheap
@fluffysheap 2 жыл бұрын
Take a look at Romans 2:14
@communityuniversalistchurch
@communityuniversalistchurch 2 жыл бұрын
Most universalists also believe hell is real, they just disagree about the duration of one's stay.
@edwardpearce1138
@edwardpearce1138 2 жыл бұрын
I suspect heaven would be hell to Hitler.
@DecoAoreste
@DecoAoreste 2 жыл бұрын
@@communityuniversalistchurch Well, I'm Catholic, so I do believe there is a place of temporary penitence where people can stay before going to heaven after they die. However, we do not call this place hell, but purgatory. We believe there is an actual hell, separate from purgatory, for people who cannot make it to heaven anymore. So... I guess we Catholics partially agree with universalism?
@DecoAoreste
@DecoAoreste 2 жыл бұрын
@@communityuniversalistchurch Also, I just found another parallel between Catholicism and Universalism around 6:06 - both reject the protestant doctrine of 'sola scriptura'.
@thetraditionalist
@thetraditionalist 2 жыл бұрын
I am the way, the truth and the life - some guy they never heard of
@andrewjohnson8232
@andrewjohnson8232 2 жыл бұрын
The Way, The Truth, The Life. By your reckoning is going to condemn all of creation to destruction and the vast, vast majority of humanity to eternal torment? So God will heal suffering and resolve evil by imposing suffering infinitely beyond anything of which the imposition is supposedly a consequence. So the end of the human story is this sentence of absolute evil, excepting the comparatively few who earned their escape as a reward? But how shall even those few enjoy that reward? If they now, being sinful and corrupt creatures, care about their fellows, how when they are perfected will they cease to care? Is the perfection you are anticipating lesser in love than the sinful state? Is this The Gospel?
@thetraditionalist
@thetraditionalist 2 жыл бұрын
@@andrewjohnson8232 people choose to sin so you only condemn yourself
@andrewjohnson8232
@andrewjohnson8232 2 жыл бұрын
@@thetraditionalist People choose to sin or are we all slaves to sin? If we are not, then surely we can choose a sinless life. Why should anyone who chooses sin when they have the choice to be sinless not be condemned?
@thetraditionalist
@thetraditionalist 2 жыл бұрын
@@andrewjohnson8232 no we can't choose a sinless life because we all sinned
@andrewjohnson8232
@andrewjohnson8232 2 жыл бұрын
@@thetraditionalist Indeed. So if Christ came into the world "not to comdemn the world" John 12:47, why does condemnation stand triumphant over salvation? Why does the sin of humanity stand triumphant over The Will of God?
@DrINTJ
@DrINTJ 2 жыл бұрын
Baptist ministers usually enjoy hating on and putting down other denominations. Not this Baptist.
@TestifyApologetics
@TestifyApologetics 2 жыл бұрын
Sounds like liberal nonsense but ok. Can you do United Pentecostals or compare Oneness groups in general sometime please?
@ReadyToHarvest
@ReadyToHarvest 2 жыл бұрын
I have a video on UPCI that will be out in December
@samuelaliren870
@samuelaliren870 2 жыл бұрын
The is why you can't have the Bible without tradition. Anyone can read their heresy into the text in order to support muh feelings.
@rumrunner8019
@rumrunner8019 2 жыл бұрын
$10 says this "denomination" will cease to exist in 15-20 years.
@musicforlife64ful
@musicforlife64ful 2 жыл бұрын
Make it 1000
@PUAlum
@PUAlum 2 жыл бұрын
my grandmother would think your soul in danger for gambling! (I hope you don't play cards!). :)
@FriarJoe66
@FriarJoe66 2 жыл бұрын
Whether or not a denomination is successful has no bearing on whether or not their teachings are true
@communityuniversalistchurch
@communityuniversalistchurch 2 жыл бұрын
Always a concern, for sure. There are lots of new denominations and associations sprouting up these days, and all such groups eventually come to an end. The United Methodist church is only a little over 50 years old but is one of the largest denominations in the world. Soon it will splinter into several new denominations. Only God knows what will happen to the CUA in the future.
@brandonn.1275
@brandonn.1275 Жыл бұрын
I'd bet this will be one of the more popular denominations in 15-20 years. After the implementation of the abortion bans, congregration sizes across the united states fell as the general public saw the church overstepping into their private life, as more mainstream churches further descend into fire and brimstone rhetoric in order to maintain the numbers more moderate members will be alienated and leave the church.
@thetraditionalist
@thetraditionalist 2 жыл бұрын
For me it's crazy how hypoctitical these people are. The Bible is super clear that you either follow god or satan, yet these people try to do both
What is Metropolitan Community Churches?
14:25
Ready to Harvest
Рет қаралды 37 М.
KingdomCraft: Why I'm not a Universalist
17:15
Redeemed Zoomer
Рет қаралды 12 М.
Luck Decides My Future Again 🍀🍀🍀 #katebrush #shorts
00:19
Kate Brush
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
THEY made a RAINBOW M&M 🤩😳 LeoNata family #shorts
00:49
LeoNata Family
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН
БОЛЬШОЙ ПЕТУШОК #shorts
00:21
Паша Осадчий
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
Interview with a Unitarian Universalist
53:22
Kris Kindred
Рет қаралды 57 М.
Why I am a Christian Universalist
8:14
Tim Carroll
Рет қаралды 6 М.
🌌 Spin Into Unitarian Universalism
19:54
52 Churches in 52 Weeks
Рет қаралды 5 М.
What are Primitive Baptists?
18:51
Ready to Harvest
Рет қаралды 104 М.
Church Denominations with McDonald's-level Dominance
9:41
Ready to Harvest
Рет қаралды 123 М.
Challenging Unitarian Universalists Beliefs about Jesus and the Bible.
14:24
A Journey Into Christian Universalism - Marz
10:45
Love Unrelenting
Рет қаралды 4,4 М.
What is Messianic Judaism?
25:22
Ready to Harvest
Рет қаралды 135 М.
The Christian Universalist Association
10:57
Love Unrelenting
Рет қаралды 1,4 М.