What is Trotskyism? | Ideology explained

  Рет қаралды 139,507

Viki1999

Viki1999

Күн бұрын

This video is an explanation of the ideology of Trotskyism. I go into all major aspects of the ideology while remaining as brief as possible. I explain Marxism and Leninism along with concepts like proletarian internationalism, the permanent revolution and the vanguardist belief.
Patreon: / viki1999
Subreddit: / viki1999
Twitter: / viki1999yt
E-Mail Address: viki1999mail@gmail.com
The song in the outro was produced by 08 (who gave me no way to credit them), you can listen to the whole remix on my second channel: • Video
Timestamps:
0:00 Intro
0:33 Marxism and Leninism
1:43 History
2:39 Trotskyism
11:48 Outro
Transcript:
Hello everybody, what is Trotskyism? A complicated question but I’ll try my best to give you an overview of the important parts. Essentially Trotskyism is the ideology of Leon Trotsky who was one of the leaders of the Russian revolution in 1917 and one of the two most likely candidates to succeed Lenin, the other one being Stalin who ended up ruling the USSR.
To understand Trotskyism, you need to understand what it builds on and that is both Marxism and Leninism. I went over this in that video already but for the sake of making this video be understandable on it’s own I will briefly go over both of them again.
Marxism essentially says that for a variety of reasons our capitalist industrialized society is divided among class lines, with the working class being exploited and oppressed by the capitalist class. When the economy and society become industrialized enough the workers will begin to overthrow the capitalists in a French revolution style takeover. After which they share everything and establish socialism.
Leninism on the other hand recognised the fact that in the country they were in, Russia in 1917, there was no large industrial worker’s army to lead a revolution. So, Lenin adapted Marxism to the reality he was experiencing. Now a party would be formed with all people who are educated on Marx and they would lead a revolution and take over the state on behalf of the working class. They would then keep the revolution safe and develop the industry until the workers were educated enough to take over and reach socialism.
Trotsky was a revolutionary along with other Bolsheviks. He was a strong supporter of Lenin and not a fan of Stalin. When Stalin came to power in the Soviet Union Trotsky began to criticise everything Stalin was doing. Eventually Stalin would exile Trotsky who ended up on Mexico were his ideas cemented and he formulated his beliefs in the ideology of Trotskyism. Trotsky was also assassinated on the order of Stalin a few years later.
Also, there are people who say Lenin wanted Trotsky to take over instead of Stalin, but this is based on the Lenin testament of which historians aren’t even sure if it’s real. Either way because Trotsky was still a socialist revolutionary while living outside of the USSR, he handily held a lot of speeches talking to people, so he made a 5-step explanation of what his ideology is supposed to be.
Trotskyism is an evolution of Leninism which itself is an evolution of Marxism. That’s why I summed both of those systems up before. Trotskyism keeps the belief in a vanguard party. The logic is that the people in non-industrial countries can’t lead their own revolution because they lack the experiences of an industrialized working class and the understanding of Marxist theory, so the party does it instead.
Trotsky supported the council system of the early USSR. Essentially all workers in one job and one region would form a council, called soviet which would send representatives to the parliament .I have a video that goes in depth about the democratic system of the USSR and how it changed over time.
This is of course a democratic system but the people who stood for election had to be members of the communist party. The idea was that this way only workers and educated Marxists could be elected, because if they allowed the people to vote for capitalist populist parties then they may lose the one socialist country in the world. This was justified as dictatorship of the proletariat.
According to Trotsky these are the 5 points which set his ideology apart from other Marxist theories. Let’s go over them and what they mean one by one.
Support for the strategy of permanent revolution, in opposition to the two-stage theory of his opponents.
So, the two-stage theory says that to achieve communism you need a lot of industry, famers can’t reach communism because the productivity is too low to create superabundance in which there is so much of everything that nobody has to work.

Пікірлер: 876
@kingoftheskies34
@kingoftheskies34 3 жыл бұрын
Half the comments are “something serious” The other half are “hee hee icepick go brrr”
@comontista3124
@comontista3124 3 жыл бұрын
Memes about trotsky: -icepick -newspaper -split
@kevinhuang8916
@kevinhuang8916 3 жыл бұрын
also invading every country that you dislike but it's socialist
@blendbajrami8114
@blendbajrami8114 3 жыл бұрын
-letter to wife
@anarchistpoops161
@anarchistpoops161 3 жыл бұрын
Nothing about killing anarchists? Oh well
@anarcookie7496
@anarcookie7496 3 жыл бұрын
I know 2 trotskyists and one actually writes for a trotskyist newspaper and they caused the group i was in to split because they kept bullying people who disagreed with them mostly the anarchists
@cosmicmusicreynolds3266
@cosmicmusicreynolds3266 2 жыл бұрын
@@kevinhuang8916 invading like the white army
@smhsophie
@smhsophie 3 жыл бұрын
trotskyists: * furiously typing 900 word comment * marxist-leninists: hehe ice pick ⛏
@christopherbolshevik6395
@christopherbolshevik6395 3 жыл бұрын
Hehe ice pick
@outlander1924
@outlander1924 3 жыл бұрын
Hehe ice pick
@Paloma73013
@Paloma73013 3 жыл бұрын
**stalinists**
@christopherbolshevik6395
@christopherbolshevik6395 3 жыл бұрын
@@Paloma73013 you're right there bud!
@Paloma73013
@Paloma73013 3 жыл бұрын
@@christopherbolshevik6395 nxnxnxn yeah, leninist is not same thing.
@KeganTheTowel
@KeganTheTowel 3 жыл бұрын
Doing "the exact same thing but in a different way" is, in fact, doing something different.
@jeffreyherrera5069
@jeffreyherrera5069 3 жыл бұрын
So much for "bad news in a good way".
@grayson0916
@grayson0916 3 жыл бұрын
I think achieving the same goal but by different means would have been a better phrasing but I think that could be from not being a native English speaker.
@RedShocktrooperRST
@RedShocktrooperRST 2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, the bulk of what I can gather about trotsky is he had a distinctive possibility of making a martyr out of Nazi Germany to the rest of the west. the Soviet Union was in no state to go liberating/conquering other nations in the 1930s, but they probably could've taken Germany in the economic and political turmoil.
@rahulingle8806
@rahulingle8806 2 жыл бұрын
@@grayson0916 👌
@JohnDolehi
@JohnDolehi Жыл бұрын
You can shoot someone in the head or chest, either way it usually falls under the umbrella of shooting someone, often to death
@bustamousegaming4423
@bustamousegaming4423 3 жыл бұрын
Make sure you're taking care of yourself Viki. Your comrades care about you. Thank you for being an educated voice in these trying times. Du bist großartig
@carlos_herrera
@carlos_herrera 3 жыл бұрын
I just wanted to second this.
@veejayroth
@veejayroth 3 жыл бұрын
I third this... =oD
@wales2815
@wales2815 3 жыл бұрын
Ich vierte das
@kanutahytomka4542
@kanutahytomka4542 3 жыл бұрын
uufff nummer fünf
@bonkedwoofy4240
@bonkedwoofy4240 2 жыл бұрын
I cringed on this.
@theremapping3840
@theremapping3840 3 жыл бұрын
ahh yes Viki, the Anarcho-Tankie Internationalist of the 7th variant
@1homelander179
@1homelander179 3 жыл бұрын
The 4th internationale, posadism. 💥🐬👽🛰️🚀
@bahman6035
@bahman6035 3 жыл бұрын
That trotsky in the thumbnail must ve had his photo taken after he got the pickaxe
@daseapickleofjustice7231
@daseapickleofjustice7231 3 жыл бұрын
I'm thinking more mid-piclaxe Trotsky when he realises he was just a counter revolutionary
@fawful94
@fawful94 3 жыл бұрын
Wrong weapon.
@hatinmyselfiscool2879
@hatinmyselfiscool2879 3 жыл бұрын
To be fair he always looks like that.
@DITOGaming
@DITOGaming 3 жыл бұрын
This was pretty based. As a Trot I'll acknowledge that if Stalin took a shit Trotsky would have claimed to have sat backwards on the toilet. For your ending people are Trotskyists now because his ideas have become more relevant over time. With the global reach of capitalism and massive alliances of imperialist nations who are all anti-communist the theory of permanent international revolution is more important now than it was in Trotskys day.
@gymcelsocialism
@gymcelsocialism 3 жыл бұрын
opposition to the stalinist method of overt bureaucracy is also really poggers, with an emphasis on the 4th international's popular front rather than the overt soviet control which the 3rd held
@DITOGaming
@DITOGaming 3 жыл бұрын
@@gymcelsocialism every Trotskyist party or org in my experience follows the 4th international method.
@BelleDividends
@BelleDividends 2 жыл бұрын
I find it strange to hear a self-proclaimed Trotskyist say that the permanent revolution back then wasn't as important, or at least wasn't as important as nowadays. It certainly was extremely important in China 1925-1927, from which Stalin's two-stages theory advocated 'collaboration with the Chinese nationalists' which a little while later caused a massive massacre among Chinese communists and revolutionaries. This heavy blow to the Chinese revolution undermined the support for the Left Opposition in the USSR itself, which enabled Stalin to deal the final blow to the Left Opposition and to drive Trotsky in banishment. It also laid the basis for the split between the Third International and the Chinese communists, which existed de facto already in the '30s, even before Mao became their leader. Had the Permanent Revolution strategy been followed, it is quite likely we would have witnessed the Chinese revolution in the '20s instead of in 1949. This in turn would have invigorated the Left Opposition in the USSR and the Third International.
@BelleDividends
@BelleDividends 2 жыл бұрын
@@gymcelsocialism Actually the Popular Front (collaboration with bourgeois forces against the fascists) is a Third International thing. The 4th International advocated the "United Front", which advocated unity in action between various working class forces, but without bourgeois elements.
@jumpinjohnnyruss
@jumpinjohnnyruss 2 жыл бұрын
"to have sat backwards on the toilet" This practice is known as "Slatering", an homage to the popular early 1990s American situational comedy "Saved By The Bell", in which a particular character would typically sit on a chair backwards, his legs straddling the seat back. The character's name was A.C. Slater.
@albertsovenskiy6140
@albertsovenskiy6140 3 жыл бұрын
Stalinists: hate Trotsky because he opposed Stalin to a petty degree and even tried to undermine the Soviet state Anarchists: wtf man you killed Makhnovia :(((
@zhitchcresttail3387
@zhitchcresttail3387 2 жыл бұрын
Dude, thank you for introducing me to this, I never knew about Makhnovia and I think I'm simultaneously in love with it and heartbroken it's gone.
@ssg9offical
@ssg9offical Ай бұрын
I hate and depise Trotsky because of that.
@kenshin4113
@kenshin4113 3 жыл бұрын
“SHUT THE FUCK UP, N E W S P A P E R S A L E S M A N”-Stalin probably
@davidwuhrer6704
@davidwuhrer6704 3 жыл бұрын
No. For one thing, Stalin was the editor-in-chief of the party newspaper. For another, he was a surprisingly humble man who held respect for his fellow workers.
@imme6372
@imme6372 3 жыл бұрын
Comrade Stalin would never disrespect a Newspaper salesman or something like that
@papichulo4171
@papichulo4171 3 жыл бұрын
ICEPICK BOTTOM TEXT
@vezja
@vezja 3 жыл бұрын
I'm crying
@dihainthegreat
@dihainthegreat 3 жыл бұрын
@@vezja me too :(
@comontista3124
@comontista3124 3 жыл бұрын
What about newspapers...
@Digitaaliklosetti
@Digitaaliklosetti 3 жыл бұрын
lmao
@ray9081
@ray9081 3 жыл бұрын
⛏⛏
@Tantibus9
@Tantibus9 3 жыл бұрын
Even as a Trotskyist, I don't think Trotsky would have necessarily been better at leading the USSR. The development of the bureaucracy was inevitable based on the material conditions in Russia at the time. Edit: Also yes the ussr was a DWS but I'd rather that than a capitalist one any day.
@MrNoobomnenie
@MrNoobomnenie 3 жыл бұрын
I personally believe that if Stalin didn't came to power, Bukharin would have been actually a more likely candidate to lead the party, than Trotsky. And Bukharin was basically a "Stalin-lite": he supported socialism in one country, collectivization and industrialization, but was against the political purges.
@LuizAlexPhoenix
@LuizAlexPhoenix 3 жыл бұрын
@@MrNoobomnenie Everyone is against purges until they are sit in the Politburo listening to people saying that they could do better all the time, when the conditions are what they are. /half s
@Azeratos
@Azeratos 3 жыл бұрын
It's funny, cause even though I'm an ML, I kiiiind of agree with the assessment that the USSR was a DWS. It was by no means a classless society, and there was indeed a technocratic/nepotistic party sub-class that formed by the end of the USSR period. I just don't think that means we shouldn't support the USSR in its effort to build socialism, especially against the Imperialist Powers.
@sameccleston8673
@sameccleston8673 3 жыл бұрын
What's a DWS?
@KomradeKlonopin
@KomradeKlonopin 3 жыл бұрын
@@sameccleston8673 degenerated workers state, what trots call the USSR or other actually existing socialism.
@leonmesquita1690
@leonmesquita1690 3 жыл бұрын
I am named after him.
@LumiNyte
@LumiNyte 3 жыл бұрын
That's actually quite cool!
@Tantibus9
@Tantibus9 3 жыл бұрын
Based
@gabrieljames7998
@gabrieljames7998 3 жыл бұрын
Check out my cool new pick axe
@hyperion3145
@hyperion3145 3 жыл бұрын
@@gabrieljames7998 Check out this dude's original meme, guys, he did the funny let's laugh at it
@furrywarriors
@furrywarriors 3 жыл бұрын
Trotsky was also hugely opposed to Stalin’s bureaucratic government style and implementation of economic planning, which Trotsky viewed as imposing demands on the proletariat, rather than representing their needs. Trotsky was also a proponent of using “experts” in fields, especially in military, industry, and economics and even used former Tsarist nobility military officers and bureaucrats to build the Red Army and state systems, which Stalin greatly opposed and would have rather purged
@NMahon
@NMahon 2 жыл бұрын
Tbf Stalin also hated the bureaucracy, it had in many ways become bigger than him and he never solved that issue in his lifetime
@alberto372
@alberto372 Жыл бұрын
@@NMahon Stalin didn't "hate" the bureaucracy because he was part of it, and that caste gave him support and basis for its position. Trotsky explained this phenomenon in its theory of bonapartism
@knowledgeanddefense1054
@knowledgeanddefense1054 25 күн бұрын
No he wasn't, that's why he helped destroy soviet democracy in the worker councils of both Russia and the free territories of Ukraine
@Hardcore_Ant
@Hardcore_Ant 3 жыл бұрын
11:18 Mao also criticized Stalin and every chair of the CPSU afterward. It's not unique to criticize Stalin, but it is unique to make constructive criticism.
@deletemymind565
@deletemymind565 3 жыл бұрын
constructive criticism like "The Soviet Union today is a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, a dictatorship of the grand bourgeoisie, a fascist German dictatorship, and a Hitlerite dictatorship. They are a bunch of rascals worse than De Gaulle."
@Hardcore_Ant
@Hardcore_Ant 3 жыл бұрын
@@deletemymind565 sounds like old timey speak for "communists and nazis are literally the same"
@deletemymind565
@deletemymind565 3 жыл бұрын
@@Hardcore_Ant exactly. mao was really cringe
@Hardcore_Ant
@Hardcore_Ant 3 жыл бұрын
@@deletemymind565 I'm not claiming mao's perfect, but there's alot to learn from maoist criticisms of the soviet union.
@davidulanovsky8943
@davidulanovsky8943 3 жыл бұрын
Trotsky did make constructive criticism and till his death he always supported the Soviet Union over its capitalist and fascist enemies. He just pointed out the failures of Stalinism.
@noandno9573
@noandno9573 3 жыл бұрын
I've been wondering about this
@KatieTheDev
@KatieTheDev 3 жыл бұрын
Me too
@kingofstars102
@kingofstars102 3 жыл бұрын
Me three
@dstinnettmusic
@dstinnettmusic 3 жыл бұрын
Trotskyism historically: Marxism-Leninism with some hot takes about the role of the peasantry Trotskyism in 2021: basically Marxism-Leninism but furiously trying to differentiate themselves from other forms of Marxism-Leninism with a materialist basis for the distinction
@magnuskallas
@magnuskallas 2 жыл бұрын
That LGBT-BLM-ANTIFA and neo-liberal (neo-commie) flag poster really speaks volumes... Saving it for archival purposes.
@ghostontheohio
@ghostontheohio 3 жыл бұрын
I would disagree with the statement "Trotskyists never achieved anything." There is more to socialism than just taking over the governments of various countries. Obviously, a political revolution is the goal. But there is so much work that needs to be done immediately, and trots are doing that work. Like Trotsky said, the point of the transitional program is not only to work toward revolution but to help workers in the day to day struggle for basic rights. Trotskyists were very important for example in the U.S. labor movement. The Minneapolis Teamsters strike was lead by trots. This doesn't mean trots are reformists. We want to see revolution just as much marxist-leninist do. But we trots are filling a niche that desperately needs filling.
@camaradamanuel5025
@camaradamanuel5025 2 жыл бұрын
Hugo Chávez claimed to be a trotskyist🤣
@davidmartinez688
@davidmartinez688 2 жыл бұрын
@@camaradamanuel5025 He can call himself that all he wants, his policies don't reflect that beyond his support for a united Latin American economic alliance and allegedly having supported Colombian rebels.
@18booma
@18booma Жыл бұрын
@@camaradamanuel5025 And North Korea claims to be democratic. Your point?
@mazscsu
@mazscsu Жыл бұрын
If only you leftists worked together, maybe the left would be successful somewhere.
@thatoneguy6578
@thatoneguy6578 3 жыл бұрын
Congrats on 33k subs only need to mulitply this number by 3 to get 100K ! Go viki
@thatoneguy6578
@thatoneguy6578 3 жыл бұрын
just in time to influence the 2024 US election with socialist ideas :)
@timothymythic7736
@timothymythic7736 3 жыл бұрын
Great video, I personally enjoyed it. What's next?
@ray9081
@ray9081 3 жыл бұрын
@deeem9500
@deeem9500 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video Viki, I always look forward to your content
@InDefenseOfToucans
@InDefenseOfToucans 3 жыл бұрын
There is a lot of disinformation on Trotskyism on a whole, so I applaud you for attempting to take it on, however I think there is a lot wrong here saying this as a Trotskyist. Both a misunderstanding of vanguardism as well as how permanent revolution functions as a rejection of the two stage theory. It is on the basis of Russia's combined and uneven development of modern capitalist systems in the major cities while also the very underdeveloped country side that cause Trotsky to conclude that socialist revolution is possible because of the linkage of the Russian state with the international capitalist class, the Russian bourgeoisie was incapable of acting as a revolutionary class, and any attempt at a bourgeois revolution could not complete it leaving the peasants angry and this is what permits the workers to act as the leadership of the peasantry and to have a proletarian revolution that completes the tasks of the bourgeois revolution. You also repeat some myths that I have debunked with some of my videos like the comparison between Trotsky and Stalin's industrialization plans. Did Stalin "Steal" Trotsky's Economic Program? kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pspooqufnN-yn5s.html A Response To AlternativeHistoryHub's "What if Trotsky Came To Power Instead Of Stalin?" kzfaq.info/get/bejne/o7aCYJOd0N2coKc.html The scripts for both videos with the full citations(I cite all of my claims as a history channel" can be found here if you would rather read then listen to a video indefenseoftoucans.gitlab.io/
@Dsonsee
@Dsonsee 3 жыл бұрын
This is one comment that I think should be pinned. Thanks for your valuable work and research, comrade fellow bird
@thechekist2044
@thechekist2044 3 жыл бұрын
Did you actually link an Alternativehistory Hub video as an argument?
@thechekist2044
@thechekist2044 3 жыл бұрын
@@Dsonsee it really shouldn't
@InDefenseOfToucans
@InDefenseOfToucans 3 жыл бұрын
@@thechekist2044 No I didn't I did a long form response video I did to althistoryhub that touches on some of the same stuff Vikki brought up.
@jacobsarvathayaparan2337
@jacobsarvathayaparan2337 3 жыл бұрын
@@thechekist2044 You didn't read his comment, he was referring ppl to his own videos that touch and expand on similar ideas.
@sphenodon2016
@sphenodon2016 3 жыл бұрын
one for the algorithm. love you viki, just subbed on patreon and happy to contribute to great content like this!
@Deadpool021
@Deadpool021 3 жыл бұрын
Just a small correction. You didn’t have to be a member of the communist party to be elected. You could run as an independent and independents consistently won seats throughout the USSR’s existence. The communist party always held a majority though so independents would usually be between 10-20% of the seats depending on the year. P.S. I am a marxist-Leninist and I really like your videos. A lot of other youtubers just insult us but you actually give a fair hearing to our view even if you don’t agree with a lot of it. I think this should be the standard on the left.
@yulin84
@yulin84 3 жыл бұрын
thank youuuuu i've been needing an explanation of this
@DeXyClarke
@DeXyClarke 3 жыл бұрын
Holy shit I was trying to search up if you've made a video on trotskyism a few days ago. Sad to see you hadn't. Looks like you answered my prayers
@Dsonsee
@Dsonsee 3 жыл бұрын
Two things: 1. This general narrative of "who was in charge and what would change" falls into the narrative favoured by liberals of the "great men who make history", and while those people certainly influence it, Trotsky was clear in his writings on the more structural problems of the developing USSR that went beyond who was in charge. I really recommend people read at least a little of his most important works where he touches on the topic, as what you know about him is probably a mix of anticommunist, antisemitic and Stalinist propaganda. 2. The idea of one person in charge is a horrible distortion of what Bolshevism was supposed to be about, as Lenin was not "in charge", to give an example. He had influence but only a vote and no way to violently enforce his will upon other party members, like Stalin did afterwards.
@swastik4302
@swastik4302 3 жыл бұрын
Exactly Comrade
@carlos_herrera
@carlos_herrera 3 жыл бұрын
How about all the times Stalin supposedly tried to resign, his objections to the cult of personality, etc.
@My-nl6sg
@My-nl6sg 3 жыл бұрын
@@carlos_herrera Litarally the same argument could be made about Mao, who was against much of the bullshit that happened in his name. This might suggest that beurocratism was a runaway train way before either leaders even noticed it. Luckily, we comrades know this history very well now and would hopefully learn from it without having to experience this all over again.
@private2809
@private2809 2 жыл бұрын
What specific works of Trotsky point to this?
@Dsonsee
@Dsonsee 2 жыл бұрын
@@private2809 Try "Revolution Betrayed". But it's also scattered here and there in many works
@jamesciosek9365
@jamesciosek9365 3 жыл бұрын
In a perfect world. The party would have been split between a Stalinist and Trotskyist faction. The clashing of ideas would have prevented the state from taking to much power and would have lead to more options for leaders.
@davidmartinez688
@davidmartinez688 2 жыл бұрын
It wouldn't, we experienced the aftermath of the Stalinist faction winning control of the mainstream socialist current and purging the Trotskyists from the party, and look where that got the left and international revolution at. Modern China capitulated to the Capitalist system in all but their government structure and some sector of their state-owned economy remain (the only redeeming factor is that they still financially bailout and support remaining Socialist and anti-imperialist countries today and didn't get involved in Russia's fiasco), Cuba is in an almost permanent economic siege by the US (I say almost in the hope that revolution disolves the U.S. or the loss of U.S. power projection in the future forces it to revert to some form of isolationism with the ascension of a rival power like China or of multipolar powers making it anyone's game and the U.S.'s allies not wanting to serve as a U.S. military bases or implement their one-sided, neoliberal, capitalist structure anymore), the Soviet Union is gone, majority of the post-soviet countries have turned sharply to Reaction, Capitalism, and NATO and EU imperialism, Yugoslavia was balkanized by reaction and xenophobia, majority of the third world socialist nations like South Yemen, Ethiopia, Somali, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Angola, Afghanistan, and so on are all gone and subject to an impoverished, war-torn, financially and economically colonized, plutocratic version of themselves, or governed by theocratic reactionary forces like the case of Afghanistan. The remaining Stalinist parties have all capitulated to the bourgeois popular front and abandoned revolutionary principles for social democratic betrayal as mainstream "socialist" or "communist" parties or dead as a result of their failed or long-drawn, stagnant guerrilla wars as the case in places like the MLs in Colombia, or the Maoists in India, and the Philippines.
@zake64
@zake64 2 жыл бұрын
@@davidmartinez688 It's almost like Communism is not a feasable economic system at all lol
@CIMAmotor
@CIMAmotor 2 жыл бұрын
@@zake64 What a shock!
@formlessuk
@formlessuk 2 жыл бұрын
This is the first of your videos I have watched. I really enjoyed your delivery.
@isaklindelov7566
@isaklindelov7566 3 жыл бұрын
thank god this video came! been waiting on it
@watoski
@watoski 3 жыл бұрын
The only thing missing now is his view of the tradition of the Communist Left in Russia with Gavriil Myasnikov, the Dutch-German with Anton Pannekoek, Karl Liebknecht, Rosa Luxemburg, the Italian in Bordiga and the French of Marc Chiric, all these groups that emerged during or after the revolutionary wave of 1917-1923 opened by the October Revolution.
@weltgeistzupferd
@weltgeistzupferd 3 жыл бұрын
Another banger. Thank you viki 1999
@TempleOfUtopia
@TempleOfUtopia 3 жыл бұрын
Ohhh I was waiting for this, thanks for the video
@1homelander179
@1homelander179 3 жыл бұрын
Trotsky: i would do it better. Stalin: alright, what's your plan? Trotsky: well, i would do it better.
@tcyr8561
@tcyr8561 3 жыл бұрын
Actually he did say how to do it better... While he was still in congress. Then Stalin booted him out. Then Stalin did what he suggested anyway, but a few years later.
@1homelander179
@1homelander179 3 жыл бұрын
@@tcyr8561 his "solutions" weren't much different from stalin's.
@MalleusImperiorum
@MalleusImperiorum 3 жыл бұрын
​@@tcyr8561 Well, and then Trotsky critisized Stalin for doing all those things anyway. A more funny thing is that Trotsky critisized other people from Stalin's circle for the same "unbolshevik" things - but when Stalin executed them, those suddenly became "the Old Guard" and "true Lenin's bolsheviks".
@smalbeaste
@smalbeaste 3 жыл бұрын
​@@MalleusImperiorum I dont know what argument you even tried to make here. Critisizing your party comrades while still being friends with them is way worse than murdering said party comrades? Are you delusional?
@MalleusImperiorum
@MalleusImperiorum 3 жыл бұрын
@@smalbeaste They were not murdered. They were sentenced to death according to the Soviet law during public trials.
@luc6284
@luc6284 3 жыл бұрын
When I first started properly learning about Marxism I was surprised that Trotsky wasn't very well liked by ML's because at school Animal Farm told me that he was actually a cute little piggy or something Eh liberal education is so fucked
@My-nl6sg
@My-nl6sg 3 жыл бұрын
the more you think about it the more liberal education is cRiNgE
@lepidus2918
@lepidus2918 3 жыл бұрын
Animal Farm is cringe
@lepidus2918
@lepidus2918 3 жыл бұрын
@@ManiacMayhem7256 1984 was an excellent one, yes
@ghostninja5035
@ghostninja5035 3 жыл бұрын
The school wants you to read Animal Farm so you don't become a socialist, but they fail to tell you that Orwell was literally a socialist.
@smokyondagrass2353
@smokyondagrass2353 3 жыл бұрын
@@ghostninja5035 And animal farm literally says the Bolshevik revolution was good. It's just that due to Stalin it went bad.
@sinanbirol1053
@sinanbirol1053 3 жыл бұрын
another video that slaps! keep it up viki
@GhoulishAdventure
@GhoulishAdventure 3 жыл бұрын
The Transitional Program is worth a read, and it’s a mistake to hand-wave the eventual assassination or imprisonment of every remaining original Bolshevik Party leader. Sometimes “doing the same thing differently” can avoid genocide. Maybe give The Revolution Betrayed a read if you like the Transitional Program. Just saying - this glossed over a very nuanced and complex moment in history and politics and I urge everyone to just read books and decide for themselves what these men stood for.
@GhoulishAdventure
@GhoulishAdventure 3 жыл бұрын
As you implied, Trotskyism is essentially Leninism without Stalinist censorship (used to justify state oppression as socialist).
@LibertarianLeninistRants
@LibertarianLeninistRants 3 жыл бұрын
"I'm gonna do my own Internationale!"
@vasilisioannou5794
@vasilisioannou5794 3 жыл бұрын
The internet one
@danielzylberkan1587
@danielzylberkan1587 3 жыл бұрын
With blackjack and hookers!
@tokevarvaspolvi8999
@tokevarvaspolvi8999 3 жыл бұрын
@@danielzylberkan1587 in fact, forget about the Internationale! EDIT: and the blackjack!
@elijahweaver6397
@elijahweaver6397 2 жыл бұрын
wow, so informational! thanks so much for all that you do.
@elijahweaver6397
@elijahweaver6397 2 жыл бұрын
i really liked when you said "wow so pog (could you tell I'm a zoomer?)"! Very funny XD
@jahsiahbowie1120
@jahsiahbowie1120 3 жыл бұрын
Love the thumbnail...
@awesomecraftstudio
@awesomecraftstudio 3 жыл бұрын
I am a trotskyist and this Video was quite alright. Though trotzkism doesn't say that only members of the communist party can be elected. The first soviet government was a multi-party gov. Only parties (and their members) which had fought against the revolution were disallowed from participating in the elections.
@justinwatson1510
@justinwatson1510 3 жыл бұрын
Excellent video. Hope lots of people find your channel.
@daveyjones81
@daveyjones81 2 жыл бұрын
Loved this, keep it up!
@EmperorSephirothII
@EmperorSephirothII 3 жыл бұрын
One correction I would make, when you said, "running a country is probably harder than it looks." that's not even the half of it. Try running a country that is also despised and loathed by essentially everyone on the other side of the iron curtain....That's a lot of hostile people, and some of them have nuclear weapons too, have fun. :D
@CIMAmotor
@CIMAmotor 2 жыл бұрын
The country was also despised by others on their side of the iron curtain too.
@EmperorSephirothII
@EmperorSephirothII 2 жыл бұрын
@@CIMAmotor Yes, but I was referring more to the Russian Civil War and its immediate aftermath where capitalist countries tried to gangbang Soviet Russia.
@charlizechurcher443
@charlizechurcher443 3 жыл бұрын
Your videos are so informative! thx!
@emanuele1107
@emanuele1107 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the video, comrade 💕
@AgulaDracula
@AgulaDracula 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video, I like the series as it helps to systematise my knowledge on the topic. Btw, I know its irrelevant, but you look great!
@moofoogee
@moofoogee 3 жыл бұрын
Yet another great video witch taught me much. Not that you have an inkling to do this but I would love a t-shirt/hoodie with the slogan “Hello Everybody” with your avatar right next to it. 😀
@zukes6517
@zukes6517 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video!
@merbst
@merbst 3 жыл бұрын
I would follow that handsome drawing anywhere!
@bigforestband
@bigforestband 3 жыл бұрын
Very informative. Thank you.
@soulplexis
@soulplexis 3 жыл бұрын
This topic was a nICE pick
@dbdist1
@dbdist1 2 жыл бұрын
For whatever reason KZfaq keeps recomending me this video even though I've already watched it twice.
@asdqwe8837
@asdqwe8837 3 жыл бұрын
gooood one comrade. i always forget why there is a split! haha i think trotskyists and stalinists should just kiss and hug.
@mauricecooper8786
@mauricecooper8786 3 жыл бұрын
I’m a trot and I literally agree. We’re more similar than we’d like to admit I think.
@fenceyhen4249
@fenceyhen4249 2 жыл бұрын
No fauk stalinism and fauk stalinists
@dhrubaintisher8169
@dhrubaintisher8169 2 жыл бұрын
The best explanation! Thank you my bro 🖤
@56bluegold
@56bluegold Жыл бұрын
Good information Thanks for posting it!
@712dal
@712dal 3 жыл бұрын
Respect to you for taking on what has been at times a controversial and divisive subject
@nebulosam45
@nebulosam45 3 жыл бұрын
Commander Trotsky was so cool, but why take things so personally? On "Lenin selected works: volume 3" Trotsky and Bukharin are criticized for thinking that 'Because there was no more Bourgeoisie, the state is now a Worker's State. So he thinks there should be no mediation in the relationship between the Workers state and the working class, and it is wrong. As if the state, being a Worker's one, the Working class would never contradict its Worker State, and would never have its interests violated' Anyway, Stalin was right 😎
@BelleDividends
@BelleDividends 2 жыл бұрын
Trotsky and Lenin regarded a revolutionary party as necessary for the worker's revolution in the advanced capitalist country too, not just the low-developed world, and as such the need for the party was not to substitute for lack of industrial working class people. Claiming that is a total misunderstanding of Leninism. Also, Trotsky broke with the third international after if had become a force of counterrevolution instead of a force for revolution. At last, I find it a bit hard to state that Trotskyism never succeeded in anything as Trotsky himself led the October Revolution in Petrograd and built and led the Red Army that saved the USSR from the White counterrevolution.
@-xphobia
@-xphobia 3 жыл бұрын
Third bullet point "Soviets are based" and all tankies nod furiously in unison.
@paulschumacher1263
@paulschumacher1263 3 жыл бұрын
Good explanation. One reason for Trotsky's militancy and "vanguardism" is the Russian Civil War--the attempt by the White Russian army and a huge invasion by Western armies (British, U.S., French, German, etc.) to overthrow the Russian Revolution. Trotsky practically created and ran the War single-handedly for 5 years. He was a good organizer and great propagandist. Most of all, he saw the overwhelming power of anti-socialist governments allied against him.
@k1ngeo805
@k1ngeo805 2 жыл бұрын
nice vid mate keep it up!
@Cay30
@Cay30 Жыл бұрын
Very well made and concise video. Thank u
@slenin8088
@slenin8088 3 жыл бұрын
Half true with some over simplified parts, like Trotsky didnt oppose Stalins ends but the way he did it. This is wrong because Stalin imposed somethings Trotsky originally wanted like mass industrialization, but with cooperation of peasants which Stalin Ignored with dekulakization.
@slenin8088
@slenin8088 3 жыл бұрын
also the 3rd international summation and the 4th international summaries are completely wrong, this is basically a Wikipedia analysis of Trotskyism
@hatinmyselfiscool2879
@hatinmyselfiscool2879 3 жыл бұрын
Rich farmers that own land are peasants? You gotta explain that to me. Also, that‘s literally what he said.
@slenin8088
@slenin8088 3 жыл бұрын
@@hatinmyselfiscool2879 Yes peasants were anyone who worked the land, the land owners (kulaks) hired workers to work the land but both were peasantry. And no I was saying the opposite of what they said.
@hatinmyselfiscool2879
@hatinmyselfiscool2879 3 жыл бұрын
@@slenin8088 i‘m pretty sure he mentioned multiple times in the video that stalin and trotsky‘s goals and programs were very similar.
@slenin8088
@slenin8088 3 жыл бұрын
@@hatinmyselfiscool2879 and thats what I'm saying is wrong lol
@Afrobriit
@Afrobriit 2 жыл бұрын
Great video
@brandypride2942
@brandypride2942 Жыл бұрын
I love your voice. It’s so soothing
@marcofrank6542
@marcofrank6542 3 жыл бұрын
Love it!
@johnpurser2798
@johnpurser2798 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for your work in this field. I came late to communism as I started off as a (USA) two time Reagan voter. To put things mildly, I had a way to go to get to where I am today. I just watched your videos on Marxism, Leninism, and now Trotskyism in sequence and for the first time I think I understand the difference. For a while I've been wondering why some Communist absolutely HATE "Trotskyists" when in fact none of them could tell me what MADE a Trotskyist. I think I get it now. Again, much appreciated and I'll be working my way through your videos. Your one on how the USSR worked was the first time anyone EVER explained that to me. Well done!
@Crucial47
@Crucial47 Жыл бұрын
What would you consider yourself now?
@pavelZhd
@pavelZhd 3 жыл бұрын
Well... Sadly there is one thing Tritskyism achieved, in my opinion. It managed to antagonise all Capitalist countries to the ideas of Communism as a whole. Like you said, Stalinims aims to build one particular country towards Communism, and then use its prosperity to inspire workers of other industrialised countries to reform their own countries when they see that socialism is achievable and works. And in the meantime, he was willing to not interfere into Capitalist countries and even collaborate with them. And the idea that Comminism is existential incompatible with Capitalism worldwide - which is the basis of animosity of the Cold War - comes from Trotskyi. Also some post-Stalin USSR leaders were also Trotskyists, so it's not like this ideology never had a chance at running a country...
@AnotherChampagneSocialist
@AnotherChampagneSocialist 3 жыл бұрын
All my favorite Lenin quotes express his contempt for Trotsky lol
@AnotherChampagneSocialist
@AnotherChampagneSocialist 3 жыл бұрын
@@ManiacMayhem7256 Yeah but everyone knows about those and even self proclaimed Stalinists are usually more aware of his flaws than liberals.
@AnotherChampagneSocialist
@AnotherChampagneSocialist 3 жыл бұрын
@@ManiacMayhem7256 Well how about Universal Basic Housing? No other nation had ever done anything like that, and sure there were some serious flaws especially with Stalin's ideas for housing, but it was the first time in history a state organized workers to build housing for the public on a massive scale like that.
@AnotherChampagneSocialist
@AnotherChampagneSocialist 3 жыл бұрын
I think one of the reasons the 'Evil Communist Dictator' narrative is so pervasive, despite western leaders generally being equally as bad if not worse, is because talking about how evil Stalin was is a way to keep us from talking about whether or it's a government's duty to meet the basic needs of it's citizens. If a nation as poor and backwards as Russia could freely feed and house pretty much everyone what excuse does any other nation have for not doing so? We're meant to focus on the bad things Stalin did so that we don't recognize the good things we could be doing.
@AnotherChampagneSocialist
@AnotherChampagneSocialist 3 жыл бұрын
​@@ManiacMayhem7256 If that we true we'd give the same level of scrutiny to Winston Churchill, but let's face it, capitalists wrote the narrative and they decided to frame it like Stalin was uniquely evil and use the invocation of his name as a *thought terminating cliche* to limit discussion of the policies we could learn from. But the truth is for all the horrid things he did, he did a lot of really based things too, for each bad policy there are good policies we could learn a lot from if we were looking to rework and improve upon what the Soviet Union got right. Establishing a state workforce that doesn't answer to the private sector and is capable of mass infrastructure and construction projects might be worth considering. It might be worth considering that money isn't real and that arbitrary concerns about currency values don't accurately reflect what can actually be done with the resources we have available. It might be worth considering that if the poorest most backwards country in europe could somehow manage to feed and house and educate everyone and provide everyone with health care, any richer and more developed country should be able to do the same. And if we can't do the same, to ask "What's stopping us" We're meant to focus on Stalin being evil so we never ask "What's stopping us from achieving what the Soviet Union achieved with so much less?" If we start asking that we start coming up with answers that scare the people that think they benefit from the current system.
@F100cTomas
@F100cTomas 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for keeping the picture
@leonidasperez
@leonidasperez 2 жыл бұрын
Great video 👍
@Jackzay90
@Jackzay90 Жыл бұрын
I've learned so much from your videos.
@Dsonsee
@Dsonsee 3 жыл бұрын
I have already commented like 5 times on this same video but it's the inaccuracies are significant. The depiction of Leninism is overly simplistic. Trotsky was clear in his works that the existence of other parties should be allowed for a healthy worker's democracy to exist. Also, it was not only Trotsky not liking the way the USSR's bureaucracy implemented its policies. You have to see the appalling (and recurrent) revolutionary failures of China, India, Indonesia, Iraq, among others, to see how the policy of the "Popular Front" gave the revolutionary proletarian up to the reactionaries. Like, I enjoy your vids Viki and have shared a couple of them to my friends but it seems like the one about Lenin and the one about Trotsky are failing on some important areas. I hope we could have some discussion on this because this is not doing the best job possible at informing young new socialists.
@anonymousnarwhal4323
@anonymousnarwhal4323 3 жыл бұрын
🧊⛏️
@BelleDividends
@BelleDividends 2 жыл бұрын
I watch this 6 months later, and I fully agree. Except I haven't watched the one on Leninism yet, so I can't really comment on that one.
@davidmartinez688
@davidmartinez688 2 жыл бұрын
I know this post was a year ago but I don't recall Trotsky calling for other parties, instead, he wanted more internal democracy within the Bolshevik party, like the factions that existed before Stalin dismantled the Left Opposition in the 1920s and later the Right Opposition in the 1930s to "preserve party unity" under him and his loyalists' control under the pretense that the two factions were dividing the party and that their existence was somehow against democratic centralism.
@Dsonsee
@Dsonsee 2 жыл бұрын
@@davidmartinez688 Trotsky was not a party fetishist, and he was totally on board with the abolition of parties during the civil war. But after it, as he says in "Revolution Betrayed", there's no reason to keep the ban on parties, even more so due to the apparent fact expressed by Stalin himself that the proletariat was absolutely victorious and classes were all but abolished.
@CleanupKrew7
@CleanupKrew7 3 жыл бұрын
Ohhhhhh shiiiiiiiit. ITS HERE!!!!!!!!!
@GrantWitherspoon
@GrantWitherspoon 3 жыл бұрын
1:48 “Trotsky was a strong supporter of Lenin” For a very long time, he was not. Trotsky was not a Bolshevik with Lenin until 1917- for more than a decade he was ideologically much closer to the opposed Menshevik party. The term Leninism, I believe *originated* with Trotsky and his circle way before the revolution- calling Lenin’s politics Leninism to attack it. (I may be confusing this with Rosa Luxemburg, if you have the deets feel free to correct me) His anti “socialism in one country” line went counter to what Lenin believed. Lenin hoped for other countries in Europe such as Germany to follow Russia in revolution, but he had to face reality when for a variety of reasons this simply didn’t happen.
@BelleDividends
@BelleDividends 2 жыл бұрын
Trotsky was only very briefly associated with the Mensheviks, like 1 or 2 years. He really struck out on his own and developed his own ideas. Where Trotsky developed the Permanent Revolution, in which the revolution would be made by an alliance of workers and peasant, but the workers would constitute ideologically the dominant part and would make a push for socialist take-over, the Mensheviks stayed with the classical Two-Stages theory. Lenin was literally in between those two: recognising the Russian capitalist class would not support a revolution like happened in France 1789, he broke from the two-stages theory and believed the revolution would be made by an alliance of workers and peasants, just like Trotsky believed, only Lenin remained very open to where the revolution would lead to. After the Februari Revolution of 1917, Lenin modified his ideas and developed his theory of the "Uninterrupted Revolution", which actually came very close to the Permanent Revolution of Trotsky.
@geekyradical4985
@geekyradical4985 2 жыл бұрын
"Trotsky long ago said that unification (between the Mensheviks and Bolsheviks) is impossible. Trotsky understood this and from that time on there has been no better Bolshevik." -Vladimir Lenin, 1917. "The complete victory of the socialist revolution is unthinkable in one country, but demands the most active co-operation at least of several advanced countries." -Vladimir Lenin, 1918. "The first role occupied by the proletariat of Russia in the world labour movement is explained not by the industrial development of the country-just the opposite by the backwardness of Russia...the Russian proletariat is clearly aware that the necessary condition and fundamental premise of its victory is the united action of the workers of the whole world, or of several countries advanced in capitalist relations." -Vladimir Lenin, 1918. www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1937/ssf/sf08.htm Sorry you don't like the truth. LOL.
@StateoftheWorld
@StateoftheWorld 3 жыл бұрын
Hey I just found your channel and I’m a fan, do you have a discord or something I could reach out to you on? I’d be interested in collabing
@transisomer5589
@transisomer5589 2 жыл бұрын
Very cool video hope you are doing best comrade
@delve_
@delve_ 3 жыл бұрын
Trotsky walked so J. Posadas could run (out of the nuclear silo carrying five nukes on his back).
@muslimsocialist9310
@muslimsocialist9310 2 жыл бұрын
I'm a fan of both Trotsky and Stalin to a degree. Both had good points. Both had their mistakes. In the end both were great Communists. And its a shame Leftists fight over it. Let's work and achieve Socialism in our lifetime today. Great video comrade..If I had money I'd donate..
@bradpaynedesigns
@bradpaynedesigns 2 жыл бұрын
Yes, I agree comrade, Stalin should have killed more people.
@robertjensen501
@robertjensen501 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@brentoneccles
@brentoneccles 3 жыл бұрын
Even that initial painting of October, putting Stalin behind Lenin, in front of Trotsky, is a lie.
@ThreatGirlAlexandra
@ThreatGirlAlexandra Жыл бұрын
"My videos don't have ads because I don't like ads" Absolutely world class ideals
@fenceyhen4249
@fenceyhen4249 2 жыл бұрын
"I have no idea what I'm talking about but here's my video explanation anyway" 😭 thanks comrade
@josephgodfrey8468
@josephgodfrey8468 2 жыл бұрын
Thumbs up for the treatment of the history. It's about the right length for my span of attention...
@Kriegerdammerung
@Kriegerdammerung 3 жыл бұрын
As a Trotskyist myself, this video is good, but Trotsky was more than simply a critique, he was founder and first commander of the Red Army. He led troops in situ, and apparently was competent in this regard.
@MalleusImperiorum
@MalleusImperiorum 3 жыл бұрын
He was not a commander, he was in charge of organization stuff. Nor was he a founder, as when the Army was actually founded, he was in Brest, negotiating with Germans. At that time he was a commissar of foreign affairs. The "first" guy was actually Nikolai Podvoisky.
@Thatshaneboy
@Thatshaneboy 3 жыл бұрын
I would be curious to hear you explain Marxist-De Leonism, based on the theories and movement of Daniel De Leon in the United States, which was rather prominent in the early 1900s. His socialism was a Marxist Syndicalism of sorts.
@fenceyhen4249
@fenceyhen4249 2 жыл бұрын
Uhhh
@cs.flippz9152
@cs.flippz9152 2 жыл бұрын
dead ideology
@Vivacious_Lenin
@Vivacious_Lenin 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Vikki
@julianjanssen5499
@julianjanssen5499 2 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure if I ever saw Viki until this video.
@faithlessberserker5921
@faithlessberserker5921 Жыл бұрын
You said you don’t put ads on your video but I literally got an ad right after you said that.
@johnnysalter7072
@johnnysalter7072 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@MrCram
@MrCram 3 жыл бұрын
Good video
@eancycler1112
@eancycler1112 3 жыл бұрын
Your voice sounds really pretty in this video!
@Brunogriffin96
@Brunogriffin96 3 жыл бұрын
Based AF, Viki, you're awesome!
@SandfordSmythe
@SandfordSmythe 3 жыл бұрын
In US leftist politics Trotsky seemed to have represented a more humane communism as opposed to Stalinism. I'm not so sure this is true. Especially in its implementation.
@kazaddum2448
@kazaddum2448 3 жыл бұрын
The US would represent anyone not in power in states on their shitlist as better than those in power. That has nothing to do with the material conditions in said states, it's just a propaganda trick to divert sympathies into ineffective channels.
@namydad6547
@namydad6547 2 жыл бұрын
as a Trotskyist i love this Video chefs kiss goodjob you're channel is a godsent
@PeterDivine
@PeterDivine 2 жыл бұрын
4:50- amazing that even Leninism apparently had to acknowledge capitalism as the best means for development of industry, and that socialism would have to parasitize itself off of that success.
@PeterDivine
@PeterDivine Жыл бұрын
@Bobby Johnson and socialism is even worse, because it creates a parasitic government to do the same thing, and what's more, strips its subjects of choice in the matter. You have over a century of socialism's empirical failure to reference, mate. Grow up.
@T--T
@T--T 3 жыл бұрын
these are really good educational vids, keep up the good work!
@asantexaba533
@asantexaba533 2 жыл бұрын
Talk about the trotskyist to neocon pipeline
@DanteM-um6fe
@DanteM-um6fe 2 жыл бұрын
instant sub
SOCIALISM: An In-Depth Explanation
50:23
Ryan Chapman
Рет қаралды 2,4 МЛН
Leon Trotsky: Communism's True Believer
21:47
Biographics
Рет қаралды 973 М.
КАРМАНЧИК 2 СЕЗОН 7 СЕРИЯ ФИНАЛ
21:37
Inter Production
Рет қаралды 544 М.
DEFINITELY NOT HAPPENING ON MY WATCH! 😒
00:12
Laro Benz
Рет қаралды 47 МЛН
DO YOU HAVE FRIENDS LIKE THIS?
00:17
dednahype
Рет қаралды 97 МЛН
Life of Leon Trotsky | A Biography (1879-1940)
35:06
House of History
Рет қаралды 54 М.
Russia is Running Out of People
17:47
PolyMatter
Рет қаралды 524 М.
How did the Soviet Union work?
22:56
Viki1999
Рет қаралды 122 М.
Leon Trotsky - Stalin's Arch Enemy Documentary
50:00
The People Profiles
Рет қаралды 1,1 МЛН
Is Liberalism Dead? Fukuyama vs Gray
1:27:21
Intelligence Squared
Рет қаралды 53 М.
France's Stunning Election Results Explained
9:39
TLDR News EU
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
КАРМАНЧИК 2 СЕЗОН 7 СЕРИЯ ФИНАЛ
21:37
Inter Production
Рет қаралды 544 М.