Thank you lol

Bugger sugar

Its secretion nothing there to see

Literally was seeing it as I read this as I was sure someone else had to mention it

Coked out crazy rich asian

more like "I knew this guy is a fcking idiot and I dont fold AA to idiots"

To be fair Wesley's reasoning makes a lot more sense because it is opponent specific. A7 is not a hand this specific opponent is going to have very often on the river and so you are only really losing to an absolute cooler.

Poker is a simple game? Don’t complicate it

@@roberthorry621 Poker is so complicated it's literally impossible to solve it.

​@@Dreamagain11 you don't need to solve it just be better than your opponents. You don't play against a solver.

He truly does it better than anybody

Punt a ruski

He did all that shit just to get snapped off on the river. Love to see it by Wesley. Kid has come a long way from being clueless to becoming a solid player.

Franciso is a great player !! without him Making stupid calls how would we make any money ?

Francisco the PRO....lmao

He had a booger

Or more coke lol

even better, dont try to bluff with top pair, wtf

You get tyhT proof tip from Matt Berky 😅

On a paired board like this … there as some spots it woulda been a good bluff

@@ticenits1926 I mean, if Francisco put his opponent on a big Ace like AK, AJ, etc he may think he has the best hand. Not really a bluff if you just misread the opponent lol

@@brianpotter2812 it's a bluff if nothing worse can call. You put your opponent on ace high so you checkraise him and think he'll do what exactly, call it off with nothing?

I've trapped a lot of people with this type of hand. Wesley won't fold AA under any circumstances, and that's why he's never going to have what it takes to win the WSOP. This is a cash game, yes, but he would play it identically in a tournament. When your opponent actually concealed QQ or 7-8s, you'll wish you hadn't snapped called just because you have aces.

​@@RobbieStacks90 who did you trap

@@RobbieStacks90 Francisco was face up here. He looked genuine weak, reluctant the whole hand, genuinely looking at Wesley to see what he was doing. Wesley snap called because he was sure, and his hand even improved on the river, and his antics of being a nit aren't to be believed, imo. Unless you've seen Wesley in a tournament you shouldn't count him out. He seems pretty smart, reading situations accurately. Not sure why you are bringing up WSOP, anyway, tbh. Edit: I hadn't even seen Wesley's explanation at the end. He said what I said, here, basically... did you see it? He said they had history in these spots, and he said he figured Francisco would think he was bluffing, and it played out like that through the river. As to why Francisco thought he needed to bet the river to push Wesley off a bluff... he probably just changed his mind and figured Wesley did have something better.

@@babarhead6956 blackbird beta

@@RobbieStacks90 QQ is not just calling tiny preflop raise and 87s is not calling flop 3 bet

Two word there, homie.

a part. not apart. those two things are opposites.

@@JBrandonMercer123 @keithkelso Keep a watchout for the grammar police guys! Lol. I mean watch out for them, they're like cops on motorcycles... love to set speed traps!

good show

Great to see so many people happy to see Doug back making poker content!!

In the smaller games that is almost always indicicative of Hollywooding a super strong hand and I would guess that's true of bigger games also. In a vacuum without being able to see the hands, Francisco's demeanor exudes the classic looking weak means strong vibe.

​@Gordon Belle not at all man 😂😂😂 if you can't tell the difference between hollywooding and what Francisco was doing than you don't need to be at the poker table. That was obviously not acting.

Did you see Francisco's neck vein? That looked like everything but hollywooding

@@iWasTheGuyWhosFucked your heart would be beating in any 300k pot pre-call.. goods or bluff

@@vincentlai4474 Yeah it's much easier to read someone when you can see their cards. I did give a couple of people a chance to flex and let us know how smart they are though, so good on them.

You must be simple. If you really know what that means

​@@davedoesthingsdreaded you mean "if you know what that really means"

wes got a boogy :P

Doug: *nitpicks Doug: "But I don't want to nitpick"

@@berdyderg900😂

Me too

Yeah its so great to have one of the most action players get stacked so he doesnt come back and we only have the nits remaining! Youre a genius!

Don’t come back? Dudes on the show like three times a week lol

@@dman8557 dude your comment makes 0 sense, action players WILL get stacked at one point or another. its part of the game. its hilarious because you say "Youre a genius!" ironically, implying that he's an idiot, but it's actually you that's the idiot.

YES IT IS LOL.... hate playing with messy chip stackers lol...20 chips per stack dammit LOL or double stack but i dont really like that either.. keep them neat

@@justinjames7801 People like him can’t do that tho. It’s too hard for him. It’s too hard for a jackass to not act like a dick.

Easy to call when the river 7 paired the board Wesley beats all two pairs,only lose to full house

@@Crybabehot Wesley clearly agrees.

Wes's explanation is pretty applicable to anyone in the general pool though. Check raising top pair makes no sense whatsoever because you could always be up against a set or AA. And then to raise the turn and jam the river is just plain awful. Nobody would ever take that line with any high value hand. Fran was basically just bluffing the whole way through trying to force Wes to fold, which is even worse considering you dont need wes to fold when you have TP. You're either way ahead or way behind already.

@@ticenits1926 raising the preflop raiser w/ a mere flopped pair is indeed not great play but thats what Wesley meant. He knew what Francisco had because that's what he does. On the other side Wes admitted he rerases with nothing all the time against Francisco. I think that's what played into this hand. The context and history is imporrtant. It's like a bluff within a bluff . It's meta poker at another level not level 1 obvious stuff.

@@JYLee-rr1sy oh I get it, Wes knows 90% of the time he can do this as a bluff but recognized this time with AA he might actually get called which he did. I was criticizing Fran's play to continue to push TP this hard to the point that he's effectively just bluffing with it, but he's in a spot where he doesnt need to bluff hence why the hand just turned into nonsense and he got stacked for it. This was borderline J4o level of play.

It’s Christian Soto from the solve for y pod lol

"The Board is getting even draw heavier" on the Turn was a kinda strange Comment when the Flop was as dry as it can get...

Wesley: This F ing guy can't even count!

underrated comment

Isn’t that pretty far from Austin?

@@keithkelso9872 about 2.5 hours, but could still effect his bigger events

Probably because raise folding a hand that strong is an even worse line

I don't know if I'd have the stones to call there on the river if I'm wesley. Its a huge pot, and it puts Aces to the test for sure

I’m guessing the answer to that is no. I’m guessing it goes exact same on flop. Then check , bet , call on turn. ( instead of check raise) Then either check , check on river Or 40-50K lead , call on river. ( specifically with a boat) I don’t think Francisco would risk pushing Wesley out of the hand with a a check raise on turn. Francisco body language would also be very different I would imagine. And I think Wesley prob picks up on this by the turn. If Francisco wanted to win this hand … his only chance was slow playing until the river … and then 2-3X pot jam when the board paired 7s. But as played .. he’s saying I have - QQ, 33, quads, or Q7. And even 33 is borderline. Very often those hands don’t try to blow you off the pot in all 3 streets.

Pot odds have left the building. But its what we like.