When did Adi Sankaracharya appear? ;

Рет қаралды 4,635

3 жыл бұрын

Please watch this video to learn interesting insights into the dates of appearance of Adi Sankaracharya.
Urgent Appeal: Subscribe to Sattology & Don't forget to press THE BELL ICON to never miss any updates
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sattology means science of truth. Sattology is an antonym of Mythology.
Become a member of Sattology KZfaq channel to become an active community member, be featured on videos, join live and be Called out ! : / sattology
For Exclusive content, please support our channel on Patreon: / sattology
Find all Sattology books at : www.amazon.in/s?k=sattology&i...
Follow us on Social Media:
Facebook: / sattology
Twitter: / sattology
Gab: gab.com/sattology
Rumble: rumble.com/c/c-307545
Telegram: t.me/SattologyCourse
Soundcloud: / sattology
Apple Podcasts: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...

Пікірлер: 49

@g.shankaranarayananil3705 Жыл бұрын

Fantastic research ....It was always breaking my mind that ADI SHANKARA must have lived in 500 BCE. Now SATTOLOGY should research disciples and Mutt heads after Adishankara from 600 BCE...... Great work SATTOLOGY and Verma's SUPER EXPLANATION WITH AUTHENTICITY. Every Brahmin should cngratulate SATTOLOGY AND SUBSCRIBE TO THE CHANNEL ......

@ketakinikini 3 жыл бұрын

By far the best in my opinion !! The presentation could have been better. But I agree that revealing that there were two sankaracharyas was eye opening.

@g.shankaranarayananil3705 Жыл бұрын

Vedveer Arya , salutes on behalf of the Brahmins for a fantastic research and presentation. Please enlighten about other Shankaracharyas

@abhijitkulkarni1977 Жыл бұрын

Very great research!!

@binitasahoo3872 2 жыл бұрын

1:25 After this, I convinced This person is a blind follower of Iskcon. You only loved him because he wrote this two Stotras? Well he has written many beautiful Astakams, Panchakam, Dashakams on various Vedic Deities and you didn't even say anything about his impeccable scholarship, Wonderful Astuteful commentaries on Prasthana Trayi and the way he uses the subtle logic to make us convince of our True Existence Reality.

@sai9 3 жыл бұрын

I believe the guest speaker has his own assumptions regarding the dates. I think dating of poorna river in kerala which changed it's course to Adishankara's house can give us a valid date when Adishankara was born, and during adi shankaracharya he did kanakadhara stotram and because there was rain of golden amla and that family has the golden amla still at their place why can we date it for the exact of the Adishankaracharya, and also Adishankara installed srichakra at few famous temples why can't we carbon date it to get the dates.

@akvenugopalan9773 3 жыл бұрын

Dating a river using scientific methodes is possible. The river Saraswathi, mentioned several times in the Rig Veda, was dated by two scientists from Bhabha Atomic Research Centre. Dr.S.M.Rao and Dr.K.M.Kulkarni had devoted two years of research, collected alluvial sand samples and water samples from ancient paleochannels in the path of flow of river Saraswathi. They have published their research report in 1998 and confirmed that the river Saraswathi started flowing around 10,000 years back and disappeared in the Rann of Kutch around 3000 years back. The Government of India had initiated this research, with a view to revive the river Saraswathi so that arid regions of Rajasthan get enough water. This research has indirectly dated the Rig Veda as 10,000 years old, since there is an eye witness account of the river Saraswathi bursting out of the Himalayas. (Rig Veda 6.62.2)

@ketakinikini 3 жыл бұрын

Spot on!!!

@Drkirtishukla 3 жыл бұрын

Great

@ravishankar-ej9nm 3 жыл бұрын

I checked Kalhan's Rajtaringini. It mentions Matrygupt as the messenger of Vikramaditya of Ujjain.

@vivekalur 3 жыл бұрын

Put sattology text expression in an appealing manner..let it remain thru out the show ..if you insist...

@4z4d 3 жыл бұрын

कृपया Chronology of india Mahabharat to mideval India (2 volumes) by Vedveer Arya अवश्य पढ़ें

@PankajKumar-yz2vo 2 жыл бұрын

So Sankaracharya 2 established Char dham in India and the image of Sankaracharya we know is the second one🙏🏻

@amarpatne5794 3 жыл бұрын

Thank you so much i got very important information on adiguru Shankaracharya ji🙏🙏🙏

@sattology 3 жыл бұрын

So nice of you

@satsudha53 3 жыл бұрын

Shanka hara shankara.

@g.shankaranarayananil3705 Жыл бұрын

How can we contact Arya, please

@buddhvivekanand5651 3 жыл бұрын

Original Buddha was around 1800 BCE

@surajv1986 9 ай бұрын

A Small Query, How can one on the basis of the names and the adjective JagadGuru and the names VidyaGhanah and Shankarendraha identify them as belonging to the Shishya Parampara of Adi Shankaracharya? I agree that the mention of Sarvajna Peetha is present but that also does not conclusively establish that these aforementioned personalities belong to the Shankaracharya Parampara. In the absence of other corroborative proof definitively tying Vidyaghanaha and Shankarendraha to the Shankara parampara, it could very well be claimed that there could have been other traditions using the same nomenclature and names. Thank You.

@vivekalur 3 жыл бұрын

Question...qso many presnters have shared so many facts...why are they not updated in modern text book...

@akvenugopalan9773 3 жыл бұрын

Latest discoveries in historical research or archeology, takes around 10 years for them to be presented in text books. Thyat is the condition in India. Dr.B.B.Lal, who retired has Director Gerneral of Archeological Survey of India had published research reports asserting that there was no Aryan invasion or Aryan migration and the Harappan, Indus valley civilisation was by people of Indian origin. He was asked why this is not taught in text books. He says it takes around ten years for new facts of research to be ioncorporated into text books.

@satsudha53 3 жыл бұрын

What about sathyology.

@vivekalur 3 жыл бұрын

What we should do get it updated?

@sattology 3 жыл бұрын

this issue must be on the ballot. - AS

@rudranathtalukdar3196 3 жыл бұрын

Fantastic explanation. Thanks 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾

@rajeevelkunchwar 3 жыл бұрын

Excellent. Adishankaracharya in 800 ce does not jell well, but recorded in each and every book available (with a sinister footnote that their Matha does not agree with this date.) Vedveerji has done a good job. Kindly get it peer reviewed, so that all the holes, if any, can be plugged for good and the truth is accepted by all.

@rajeevelkunchwar 3 жыл бұрын

All the texts available in the name of Shankaracharya are not written by Adi Shankaracharya?

@akvenugopalan9773 3 жыл бұрын

Yes, that is right. There is a great scholar, Late Vidhyavachaspathi Panoli, who had devoted a life time to study and research Adi Sankara Literature. And written several books. He had a masters degree in English Literature as well as a masters degree in Sanskrit studies. He says all the Bhakthi works attributed to Adi Sankara are not written by Adi Sankara. Google for V.Panoli's books. Adi Sankara had told repeatedly, that one cannot attain Moksha by By Bhakthi, or Yoga or Tantra. Then how he can compose Bhakthi literature? The answer is that Adi Sankara didn't write any of the Bhakthi literature attributed to him. Other Sankaras had misused his name as the author of their works.

@manjunathabrao5292 3 жыл бұрын

Adi shanakaracharya was never against karma kaanda and upasana kaanda of vedas He said that karma kaanda is required for chittashuddhi Upasana kaanda will give jeevatma sayujyam Jnana kaanda will give kaivalya moksha If he was against bhakthi maarga why he would revive temples like badarinath, puri jagannath Why he will establish matts each with chandramouleeshwara shiva lingam?

@binitasahoo3872 2 жыл бұрын

@@manjunathabrao5292 true

@amitdixit2362 3 жыл бұрын

वेदवीर आर्यजी, क्या आप "आर्य" भारत में बाहर से आए थे या नहीं यह बात पर प्रकाश डाल सकते हैं?🙏

@anuradhajain9376 3 жыл бұрын

Watch this documentary on Discovery plus......Secrets of Sinauli. Also, Jaipur Dislogues ( you tube channel ) Debunking Aryan Invasion Theory.

@akvenugopalan9773 3 жыл бұрын

@@anuradhajain9376 Yes, Secrets of Sinouli is an excellent documentary. Full documentary is about 55 minutes duration and is available only on Discovery + channel. : www.discoveryplus.in/videos/secrets-of-sinauli/secrets-of-sinauli?seasonId=1&type=EPISODE Excerpts are available on youtube.com. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rJ2Iespyx9-biY0.html Worth watching. It is about our ancestors.

@milkyway4616 3 жыл бұрын

Utkrist bharat

@karthikn3167 4 ай бұрын

When Vedveer Arya says "a year", I wonder if a year was 365 days in our traditional calendars too?

@raghavarvoltore6517 3 жыл бұрын

Vedveer Arya has come as the Messiah to save Indian chronology from our obnoxious world chronology that was been laid out by Western scholars.

@pratham5719 3 жыл бұрын

Yes indeed he is a messiah Remember we met on Twitter I am Pratham

@deepaksinghbisht7326 3 жыл бұрын

__/\__ abhaar aap dono ka ji

@shyamsunderterwai8615 3 жыл бұрын

With respect to ur works, if u say saka Era and Vikram Era is the cause of this problem then everything will shift to 661 yrs + 660 yrs. Can u have put in place all the events and personalities by 1330yrs?? Pl justify. Thanks 😊🙏

@Itihasa_bharat 3 жыл бұрын

Pl go through my book "Chronology of india: From Mahabharat to Medieval Era (2 volumes)". I have explained in detail about the error of 661 years.

@anuragchand 3 жыл бұрын

The host introduction is totally out of touch. Its शङ्कराचार्य and not संकर as he said and then telling that it denotes varna sankar is simply manipulative. The host lacks general understanding of Sanskritam and varnamala which is there in Hindi also

@shankerram6076 3 жыл бұрын

True.

@manjunathabrao5292 3 жыл бұрын

Correct adi shankaracharya never went against shastra smriti and purana He never renounced on varna ashrama dharma

@shankerram6076 3 жыл бұрын

Is Al Beruni a muslim? If so he has to be after the founding of islam. There was no islam in 450-60 BC.

@SitaShank 3 жыл бұрын

What is said is that Al Beruni said / Dated that Harsha was so many years before his time based on information he had in his time! Not that he was a contemporary of Sri Harsha.

@litconlegalassociatesassoc4312 3 жыл бұрын

Sri Harsha Era is 457 BC. And this quote is from Al Beruni’s book. Al Beruni is not in the era around 450 BC. You need to check carefully what the speaker is exactly communicating. Thanks