When You Need to Fire a Missile But You're Late For Work

Рет қаралды 3,116,673

7 ай бұрын

New shorts each and every day. Hit subscribe if you enjoy our content!
#army #military #navy #usarmy #usmilitary #usnavy #ukraine #militarytraining #veterans #marines #marinecorps #navyseals #specialforces

Пікірлер: 2 300

@vexrmedia 7 ай бұрын

my best title yet?

@MANTUEFLIE2 7 ай бұрын

Nah

@xtc-42 7 ай бұрын

@davidtilley6016 7 ай бұрын

When your wife says come home now but you still have a War to win.

@santosoabimayu 7 ай бұрын

Impressive

@admiralkosovothefirst 7 ай бұрын

i guess you earned a sub

@austinteal3645 7 ай бұрын

"DO NOT SHOW THIS TO WAR THUNDER PLAYERS" 💀💀💀

@milkmakesyoustrong9085 7 ай бұрын

So how much is research for this

@ManDrinkingMilk 7 ай бұрын

Do not show this to the basement man!

@armantaheri9325 7 ай бұрын

Something similar is in Chinese tech tree already

@NoBleech 7 ай бұрын

Already in the game

@HFFCANADA 7 ай бұрын

Lol on God. The internet is why we cant have nice things anymore. 4chan, Reddit and now of all places War thunder lobbies like wtf

@jonmandelbaum5395 7 ай бұрын

The way that thing jumps pauses and change direction then zooms into the ether reminds me so much of my 4yr old nephew when someone mentions pie

@jackjones9460 7 ай бұрын

Is your nephew named Sam or Tor, btw? 😅

@jonmandelbaum5395 7 ай бұрын

@@jackjones9460 no it’s Leon. He’s 4. So he’s Leon the unprofessional.

@jehoiakimelidoronila5450 7 ай бұрын

Jesus christ why you have to roast your nephew like that 😂🤣

@EntheozineBlogspot1 7 ай бұрын

😂😂😂

@jackjones9460 7 ай бұрын

@@jehoiakimelidoronila5450 Because nephew roasting is Funny… and he can’t even read yet to find out. 🤪😜🤓

@vaztion 7 ай бұрын

That 90 degrees turning is insane

@TearsOnAWind 4 ай бұрын

it`s a russian anti-air system TOR-2. Another gorgeous missile is anti-ship "Onyx" of complex Bastion (watch?v=c_P5-ns5R54)

@ddff3618 3 ай бұрын

Is it ? from weight/use perspective a waste of weight and equipment ?

@generalkenobi5173 2 ай бұрын

@@ddff3618 its because its cold launching so it has to do that. Cold launch vs Hot launching have their uses as demonstrated in this video a cold launch usually is safer than a hot launch.

@AllisterCaine 2 ай бұрын

@@generalkenobi5173hot launching requires a booster, often, yet it is quite safe nowadays, see VLS on us ships. The steering system remains with the missile so it takes a little toll on kinematics, but not much propably.

@generalkenobi5173 2 ай бұрын

@@AllisterCaine in the circumstances of a missile malfunctioning a cold launch will simply eject the missile vs a hot launch. They both have their uses and am not well versed in the two I just have general knowledge regarding them but I would assume cold launch has better readiness in terms of reaction. But anyways I can't really debate much in regards to the two. But I would assume they both have their disadvantages and disadvantages otherwise everyone would only use hot launch.

@DamianAndresLopezTodini 7 ай бұрын

Pythagoras was born in 600bc Missiles in 601bc:

@annasdad8008 7 ай бұрын

So missiles were created a year before he was born?

@DamianAndresLopezTodini 7 ай бұрын

@@annasdad8008 indeed

@jimclemmer1223 7 ай бұрын

That’s funny 😂😂😂😊

@droidnick 7 ай бұрын

Explain?

@SavageHenry777 7 ай бұрын

@@droidnick My guess is that the missiles didn't know the shortest route to go yet.

@sammaxwell7051 7 ай бұрын

From one Sam to another that is impressive 😂

@Masterafro999 7 ай бұрын

I see what you did there😂

@andyboog2010 7 ай бұрын

Not really. You'd think they're be able to down alot more targets theman they do. Hell! They get destroyed by the very targets they're supposed to destroy

@brian_m666 7 ай бұрын

😏 Touché

@baconatoromg6062 7 ай бұрын

@andyboog2010 care to share your stats mr war expert?

@TheGito413 7 ай бұрын

These are the Day's of Our Lives 😂

@eyoutube1 7 ай бұрын

I can only imagine what people would think if this landed in world war 2.

@Hazman79 7 ай бұрын

If they were English they'd have thought is was probablt another V2 and if they were German they'd have thought it was a Katyusha barrage

@gilibran 7 ай бұрын

They would probably think, that's nice, did you bring a shit ton of missiles and spare parts to because we dont have the technology to build new ones.

@witoldschwenke9492 7 ай бұрын

Germany was experimenting with AA missiles already and had some good ideas for those, so it wouldn't be too much of a surprise for them to see this. You gotta keep in mind that most rocket and space plus jet engine tech originated in Germany.

@randomnameseventythree2255 7 ай бұрын

no it didnt every nation had rocket tech and jet engines in fact the Brits had jets BEFORE the Germans did they just didnt deploy them cause they werent ready yet rockets were a thing back in the black powder days btw long before Germany was a nation @@witoldschwenke9492

@IwonyoulostLOL 7 ай бұрын

@@Hazman79probably talking about the vehicle dude, they had missiles

@ennuied 4 ай бұрын

Soviet era military designers: that is a crazy idea, we thought about it and we want to do it.

@ReynoldGreenlefe177 2 ай бұрын

The soviets came up with some badass stuff. Both sides did more than a little bit of reverse engineering! Basically two teams of scientists with unlimited budgets, looking at what eachother is doing and being like "nice, nice, I raise you this". Haha

@SuperVitaliy2010 Ай бұрын

I believe not enough brain cells in whole USA to do something like this.

@viktoriyaserebryakov2755 Ай бұрын

@@ReynoldGreenlefe177 Yeah but one team had vodka.

@erastvandoren Ай бұрын

@@ReynoldGreenlefe177 The Soviets mostly copied Western stuff.

@Likeaworm Ай бұрын

@@erastvandorenstill baffled at why the British government thought it was ok to give them the Rolls Royce Nene engines for “commercial use” in 1946. They would have been far behind western jet engine design if this didn’t happen.

@forest6045 7 ай бұрын

SAMs are peak military machines. Truly impressive and badass

@kevintewey1157 6 ай бұрын

No, they suck. KINZAL BEAT SAM

@orionide4032 6 ай бұрын

@@kevintewey1157😂😂😂😂😂 you keep believing that.

@kevintewey1157 6 ай бұрын

@@orionide4032 except I literally saw the Sam missiles get destroyed. So you believe whatever you want and you're a coward because you won't put $10 let alone $100,000 against it like I would

@kevintewey1157 6 ай бұрын

Ban GTA 6 you are degenerates

@jeanmuyuela8112 5 ай бұрын

@@kevintewey1157you are soooo true thats why ukrain doesnt have anti air anymore because the mighty kinzhal defeat them all with no contest.......

@rekunta 7 ай бұрын

Who’s a good missile launcher? You are!

@J123G 7 ай бұрын

Originally developed by the Soviet Union under the GRAU designation 9K330 Tor, the system is commonly known by its NATO reporting name, SA-15 "Gauntlet". A navalized variant was developed under the name 3K95 "Kinzhal", also known as the SA-N-9 "Gauntlet". Tor was designed to shoot down guided weapons like the AGM-86 ALCM and BGM-34 day and night, in bad weather and jamming situations. Tor can detect targets while on the move.

@clintelkins9630 6 ай бұрын

Tank: yeet Missle: *WAHOOOOOOO*

@_runta 6 ай бұрын

😂😂😂

@Ayhunt7 7 ай бұрын

Missile flight is so dope

@Ordinaire. 7 ай бұрын

Да, когда перегрузка выше 20-30G Отлично полетаем!

@user-pt8st6jj9n 6 ай бұрын

Baron von Munchausen preferred a cannonball. But I think he wouldn't mind a rocket either.

@havanasyndrome3024 6 ай бұрын

@@kevintewey1157you you realize this is a Russian SAM? You want Russia to target their own SAMs? I don't know why you keep babbling about Kinzhal...

@fukkyoutube 7 ай бұрын

this would be great for traffic on the beltway 😂

@johnirizarry275 7 ай бұрын

😂😂😂

@vincespec-op4710 6 ай бұрын

Beltway 8 !! Lol Greetings from Houston Texas 🤙🏼

@BrianKedersha 5 ай бұрын

Better to leave the DMV like I did

@PostprandialTorpor 7 ай бұрын

My daydream when I got the sunroof open stuck in traffic on way to work

@alexeivoloshin5984 4 ай бұрын

The variant you're showing has 16 missiles onboard.

@doodskie999 7 ай бұрын

The way it yeets the missile at the end gave me a chuckle😅

@Ordinaire. 7 ай бұрын

Как первый самолётик на пульте управления. Запустил и не знаешь, что делать, если он идёт в крутое пике. 😂 Ракета такая: ↙️⬇️⬆️➡️↗️

@Cirno_Say_No_To_Zionist 6 ай бұрын

Yeah I mean it's an Interceptor Missile so it needs to be a fast missile

@rahrah-vx6ln 3 ай бұрын

My stomach after a dinner night out in an Indian restaurant

@realomon 6 ай бұрын

some engeneers were having fun designing this missile. "Igor, lets make this rocket turn in air!"

@claudeboels3878 6 ай бұрын

Right russian junk always look impressive they turn in the air and bla vla bla but old junk only. Iranians made now better SAM

@realomon 6 ай бұрын

@@claudeboels3878 Russian SAM is state of the art, you clueless moron :) go watch national geographic or something 🤣🤣🤣

@peterdurum434 6 ай бұрын

@@claudeboels3878 Russian junk? Russia has the most advanced and sophisticated air defense in the world.

@havanasyndrome3024 6 ай бұрын

@@claudeboels3878cold vertical launch system with nosecone thrust vectoring... You know the stuff the US is planning to have in the future... Edit: The funny thing will be once the US matches the tech, you'll have bunch of goobers in the comment section claiming that Russia stole the technology from the US. Because according to AmeriKKKunts everyone steals everything from them. 😂

@magu4magu477 5 ай бұрын

@@peterdurum434 наследство богатое от советского союза. Сейчас так не умеем

@olusegunfeyisetan1127 6 ай бұрын

We've so much perfected the art of destroying each other. So much! 🤦‍♂️

@_runta 6 ай бұрын

I find it fascinating and really retarded

@Kestrel16C 6 ай бұрын

Yes. Good.

@macreynandmatias2741 6 ай бұрын

No one in animal kingdom can surpass us. Wee need to keep the balance of nature😂😂😂😂😂😂.

@michaelbuckers 5 ай бұрын

Fun fact: if you were to meet any alien civilization, there's very high chance that they'd be exactly like us: curious, reckless and violent. Any species needs the first two in order to develop advanced and suicidally dangerous technologies like space flight, and any species needs the second two in order to come out on top at the competition against their peers. Non-curious civilizations never care to develop any technology. Non-reckless civilizations never dare to pass thresholds that can get them killed. And non-violent civilizations will die by the sword of those who are.

@Bean_guy2 4 ай бұрын

This is for defence

@smoadia85 7 ай бұрын

i always find it amusing somehow that you yeet the missile out like poop and it powers itself with it's internal fuel

@StefanBlagojevic 7 ай бұрын

...and then the missile, lowers itself into a horizontal position using its frontal thrusters and off it goes to its target, all that happens within a couple of seconds. Very impressive anti-aircraft missile system.

@ligmasurvivor5600 6 ай бұрын

cold launch method

@campandcook3118 5 ай бұрын

@@StefanBlagojevic thats because the missile knows where it is at all times. Then it subtracts elevation to orient itself horizontally, where it previously wasn't. When it is, where it previously wasn't, it accelerates towards where it currently isnt

@Vlad-mb4mj Ай бұрын

И потом эта какашка прилетает тебе на голову.

@delta-db2qk 7 ай бұрын

I dont know if its the best but that is definitely the coolest launch system out there.

@NANA-rc8lo Ай бұрын

they keep saying its soviet era blah blah blah .. but they cant point out the fact that although the design was soviet era the tech inside "chips etc." are modern even the munitions are modern .

@michaelmcwhirter 20 күн бұрын

These systems fr be yelling "Kobe" and then delivering warheads at the speed of mach Jesus 💀

@comingviking 14 күн бұрын

Also networks with other AD systems which gives the system very good situational awareness.

@tomaszwota1465 7 ай бұрын

SA-15. Stuck them into a proper layered air defence system and it's no joke.

@anthonyinzerillo2804 7 ай бұрын

Yup, it's beyond me why no Western military has developed such a system.

@averagegmail 7 ай бұрын

@@anthonyinzerillo2804This one isn’t involved in a layered air defense so it has one large range of threat types, but not all of them, as western militaries have multiple with smaller threat types, such as ADATS, C-RAM, Patriot, and THAAD.

@anthonyinzerillo2804 7 ай бұрын

@@averagegmail Your right, but most Western militaries only have the MIM-104 Patriot out of those systems and some type of CIWS (but mostly on ships). Many NATO members are not well equipped with airdefense, ADATS is also not widespread. Also the other systems mentioned are all stationary and not perfectly suitable for a warfare like in Ukraine and the missiles are extremely expensive. What I meant is that NATO forces lack highly mobile short- and medium-range SAM systems with cheaper ammunition. Basically NATO most forces rely on MANPADS for mobile AD. I think the current war clearly shows the need for such systems, especially to counter the huge amounts of drones that will appear on future battlefields. Just imagine the sheer amount of drones China or even Iran would unleash in a possible future war. China could use several hundred thousand of FPV drones...

@averagegmail 7 ай бұрын

@@anthonyinzerillo2804 For drone swarms, I do not think SAMs will be very useful at all. I believe the C-RAM (the ground based CIWIS) would be useful, but my main choice would be the mobile German Gepard. As it fires slower with better accuracy, it will conserve ammunition for dealing with the most drones possible. The downside is only a few South American and European countries operate it, (including Ukraine and excluding Romania).

@Elenrai 7 ай бұрын

@@anthonyinzerillo2804I suspect its the old case of "is it needed?" Like the reskinned abrams x or the future gun leopard prototype, like, sure, its cool, neat, awesome even, but....use against who? Russia is a meme, India is busy tard wrangling China, and China is busy being a demographic collapse into a failed state. Point is; why?

@mpouzeris6827 Ай бұрын

I've seen people making fun of this weapon. Little do they know that this thing was manufactured in the 80's and still has a 90% target kill ratio.

@lmao.3661 Ай бұрын

What they say is usually vastly different from the reality.

@nian89 Ай бұрын

now THIS is a drive-by!

@mattthesedg4238 7 ай бұрын

I'm sure I read somewhere that the M1 carries 8 missiles yet the M2 carries 16, missiles have a long burn time so they can maintain the alleged 55 G overload for almost the entire flight time

@andreykardashov6343 6 ай бұрын

My only question, even for the M2, why would you track 48 targets when you can, at most, only shoot down 16 of them?

@mattthesedg4238 6 ай бұрын

@@andreykardashov6343 It's talking about the search radar that can keep track of 48 targets and display them for the operator to see. The tracking radar can actively track 4 targets at once and engage all 4 providing they stay within the field of view for the SACLOS system

@cat_clan_leader 6 ай бұрын

@@andreykardashov6343probably to decide which target is of higher importance, rather than firing all your missiles at a few targets you can see but then later finding out there was a more important target right after

@verg818 6 ай бұрын

@@andreykardashov6343 Tracking radar just gives updates on the targets positions. To engage, they gotta use an engagement radar that gives a higher refrash rate which allows them to launch a missile. The tracking radar gives them enough targets to prioritize the correct targets. Then they can engage up to 4 of those tracks at a time :)

@YouTube_is_full_of_trolls 6 ай бұрын

It's a worthless system that seemingly can't intercept about anything in Ukraine. Even 30-40 year old missile systems are getting by tor with ease

@davidlee50 7 ай бұрын

Mom won't let me have 47 other drones.

@kalashnikov_47z 7 ай бұрын

People think Drones are Faster than mach 3 missiles 😂

@Jacobhuynh5 7 ай бұрын

Which one is cheaper

@MrMson 7 ай бұрын

@@Jacobhuynh5which is more valuable? Human life or a drone?

@romansit9110 7 ай бұрын

They are not faster, they are sneakier.:)

@Jacobhuynh5 7 ай бұрын

@@MrMson bro what the fuck nobody’s riding on the drone

@sebastienleblanc2708 7 ай бұрын

CRAM systems or Gapard s would do the job...

@JustLikeHeaven77 Ай бұрын

Gawd Bless the U.S. and A.

@T3TomTomAwesomeYTchannel 3 ай бұрын

Shoots like a missile warship 💀

@jamesrodriguez5750 7 ай бұрын

I was late for work but this short came up and I thought, I can be late, I can fire this rocket and not even worry bout work! But I got bills to pay and need to get away from her… what’s that babe!

@user-tq1wf1uu6f 4 ай бұрын

TOR : 30 MISSL : 650

@sabprogroup8623 2 ай бұрын

They trust their missile so much they are able to cold launch them before it even fires 🔥.

@guilhermesada5840 Ай бұрын

The bane of airliners!

@honfmeilingfleet957 7 ай бұрын

what a quick launch

@MilanDrazic 7 ай бұрын

Wow launch rockets in full speed 😮

@Zuleika_1 2 ай бұрын

Jump, pause, change direction is insane 👌🏻

@Polishee-ko6gz 5 ай бұрын

KABOOM! - the guy who was late for work

@625ozy 7 ай бұрын

It better be able to shoot on the move

@zigi888 7 ай бұрын

It does do that

@brandonholmes8485 23 күн бұрын

Seriously, why haven't these been able to intercept ATACMS missiles? That's what they were meant for to protect bigger systems like the S-400.

@afiqdanial3053 3 ай бұрын

THE MISSILE KNOWS WHERE IT IS AT ALL TIME

@TonnyH21 5 ай бұрын

Ameriboos be honest, Russian missiles are wilddd🔥

@Bean_guy2 4 ай бұрын

Yeah, all 3 of them

@jb76489 4 ай бұрын

Why didn’t those wild Russian missiles save the Moskva?

@whatsmolly5741 4 ай бұрын

@jb76489 tor m2 was the unexpected star from Russia's deployment to syria. The pantsir s1 was supposed to be the star but the ability of the tor m2 to simultaneously move and fire gave it a completely unexpected higher kill rate than the pantsir s1. The pantsir s1 has a navel version which is what the moskva had but unfortunate tor m2 is only land based for now.

@spidersaremean8917 4 ай бұрын

@@jb76489 Because it didn't have its anti air on.

@jb76489 4 ай бұрын

@@spidersaremean8917 why not? The ak-130, ak630, osa-m and s300 could all have shot down the subsonic neptunes

@AugmentedGravity 6 ай бұрын

Oh look a civilian airliner!

@theaterofsouls 4 ай бұрын

hahaha

@afiqdanial3053 3 ай бұрын

@@theaterofsouls wasnt that was ukraine? that shoot down MH17?

@vickoslavkovic2593 2 ай бұрын

@@afiqdanial3053Yes.

@TheRavensOmen 2 ай бұрын

@@afiqdanial3053 It was shot down with a Russian missile. Shooting at civilian targets is ok because NAZIS!

@tetraxis3011 2 ай бұрын

I believe One of these shot down a Ukrainian Airliner in Iran back in 2020.

@Bruh_bruh21377 3 ай бұрын

Why this looks like war thunder in first clip☠️

@BeardedGuy_Tawhid 7 ай бұрын

War thunder players: it can fire at 75kmph and here’s the document that proves it

@thecorneroftheinternet4656 7 ай бұрын

This has gotta be one of the best fly swatters on the market

@nellosnook4454 7 ай бұрын

Yes-VERY impressive!

@chandlerwatson1379 7 ай бұрын

You know it's a Russian vehicle right?

@andrepot2871 7 ай бұрын

Knowledge issues lol

@kalashnikov_47z 7 ай бұрын

@@chandlerwatson1379 Then it might be bad right?

@Masterafro999 7 ай бұрын

@@kalashnikov_47zbecause everything russian is automatically bad.

@MrMson 7 ай бұрын

@@chandlerwatson1379why does that matter? It’s still cool as shit. Abrams is cool, T-72 is cool, just because it’s Russian doesn’t mean it’s not cool

@Ali-zq4gc 2 ай бұрын

Without manpower, this is nothing

@wuwuman1021 5 ай бұрын

Lots of people are late to work and need to fire a missile according to the footage

@DarkMatterX1 7 ай бұрын

Honestly, Russian engineered missiles are glorious to watch launching. The aiming/course correction rockets firing is awe inspiring. All the shit people talk about Russian gear, but their rocketry is A1. Solid engineering.

@davidthomas3859 7 ай бұрын

They make good radars too..

@TheHateSpeechChannel 7 ай бұрын

When they work.

@haydavinoo7779 7 ай бұрын

@@TheHateSpeechChannel is the patriot russian made so I'm on your side 😂😂😂

@cr366 7 ай бұрын

Yeah Russian SAM’s have shot down more of their own aircraft than anyone else.😂😂😂

@DarkMatterX1 7 ай бұрын

@@cr366 You're ascribing human error/poor training to the weapon system. I didn't say Russians are excellent personnel. I said their rocketry is, and has been, exemplary. To say otherwise is preposterous, and evinces the fact that everything you know comes from western media coverage of the Russo-Ukrainian conflict.

@MrWasGehtSieDasAn01 7 ай бұрын

Russians: Check out our super expensive and super awesome anti-air tank That one Ukrainian with his 700$ FPV Drone: Oh man, im about to end this man whole carrier

@olexp9017 6 ай бұрын

Are you sure it is not the story about Ukrainian Leos?

@MrWasGehtSieDasAn01 6 ай бұрын

@@olexp9017 More like the storys about the T-90M's

@user-qc3yl1nx4h 6 ай бұрын

@@MrWasGehtSieDasAn01про леопард вам ничего не рассказывают? которые пачками уничтожаются!?байрактары долетались!

@quinton01 6 ай бұрын

@@olexp9017You have to excuse them. Most Americans _really_ believe Ukraine is winning the war and that Russia is barely hanging on and the verge of collapse.

@jovidutful 6 ай бұрын

@@MrWasGehtSieDasAn01maybe Ukraine is beating Russians in Moscow right now.?

@nikerailfanningttm9046 5 ай бұрын

The launch: “step one; yeet missile upwards. Step two; engage afterburners”

@spynix0718 7 ай бұрын

God, this might not even be American, but I love the military industrial complex.

@the_real_bin_chicken 7 ай бұрын

its russian

@VinhNguyen-fb9lk 7 ай бұрын

We all knew by now how they performed against cheap drones 😅

@Max_Da_G 4 ай бұрын

We sure do: they kicked a whole bunch of drone ass ;)

@VengeanceSinX 3 ай бұрын

Bayraktars were never heard of again lmao...😂

@russischepatrizanen Ай бұрын

А давай теперь сравним цену одной ракеты и цену того ущерба который может нанести один дрон. Уже не так смешно? По твоему мнению использование подобрых ЗРК против дронов всё ещё не рационально?

@Western_1 5 ай бұрын

I've seen concepts for an American version of this using an AAV as the chassis and firing AMRAAMS vertically. Never made it past the drawing board probably because American doctrine is you use aircraft for air superiority not ground vehicles.

@SebasL10 2 ай бұрын

This is impressive

@inspectormills3290 7 ай бұрын

Lots of damaged ones available for a good price. Some units will need repair

@_Void_Archive_ 3 ай бұрын

Thanks to these things, only fragments from 15-20 vampires fall on Belgorod, and not the missiles themselves. Thanks to them!

@user-xu3jp2kf8q 2 ай бұрын

Vampire is Czechoslovakian variant of bm-21 grad, they don't even have range to reach Belgorod. You are an idiot

@speechki 6 ай бұрын

I love Freedom!!! whY No lInK tO AmaZoN!? *For self protection ofc

@louies6914 Ай бұрын

TOR failed misserably in Ukraine.Drones were missed by its missiles.

@Just_another_Euro_dude 17 күн бұрын

These missiles seem too big for drones. More for the helicopters. German Gepards were absolutely great vs drones (and helicopters). And they are from the 70s!

@user-xh3wr1do7k 7 ай бұрын

All the ones I’ve seen have been burned out wrecks.

@jessepacheco6020 6 ай бұрын

Yup.

@havanasyndrome3024 6 ай бұрын

This is TOR, not Patriots. 😂

@johnnyvandep1375 5 ай бұрын

Not a single Patriot has been destroyed. Cope more.@@havanasyndrome3024

@inf783 5 ай бұрын

*after shooting down dozens of drones and hundreds of small projectiles

@westerxxx9220 5 ай бұрын

@@inf783don’t tell them.. They think that those things are just afking until death.

@efesair4336 6 ай бұрын

And it can be killed by a $300 drone :-)

@Lomnjac007 6 ай бұрын

It cannot. It's a Russian SAM system, the FPV drone carries just 200gr of explosives or a 60mm mortar shell, it can damage it sure, but to destroy it would have to be a very lucky shot. On the other hand Lancets destroyed THOUSANDS of Ukranian armor so far, and then half of that they showed as Russian destroyed armor because it was for example a T-72 which both sides use...

@n3v3rforgott3n9 6 ай бұрын

@@Lomnjac007 "THOUSANDS of Ukranian armor" HAHAHAHA yet barely any photos to back anything up XD Meanwhile there is an individual photo for each and every 2600 Russian tank damaged and destroyed as that is the bare minimum and the true number is higher XD. 24 tor M2s have been damage or destroyed.

@user-xy4rh4gy7f 6 ай бұрын

@@n3v3rforgott3n9 and with all those destroy ed thanks, the stooge kiev regime, along with its master, must be winning the war against russia these days right?

@chakalote_tco4820 6 ай бұрын

@@n3v3rforgott3n9No 2600 tanques, 2600 blindados, aunque a este ritmo y con Rusia haciendo chistes en cuestión de tácticas, fácil se les rompen mas tanques.

@n3v3rforgott3n9 6 ай бұрын

@@chakalote_tco4820 No 100% 2600 TANKS... with a picture of each one being counted. 1717 being destroyed outright and the rest being damaged, abandoned, or captured.

@JuiceBlack 5 ай бұрын

It looked like it just chucked the missile before the rocket ignites 😂

@proudzerzurancitizen Ай бұрын

they call it a missile because it misses

@Yisraelamundas Ай бұрын

I don't think so

@donaldlyons17 7 ай бұрын

well but the bigger problem might be landmines!!

@manteca2132 7 ай бұрын

This systems are deployed in zones where the land is clear and are not used like tanks or any other Armored vehicle.

@robertttttt716 7 ай бұрын

Actually it's a $1,200 drone that is their nemesis. So small made mostly out of paper it's not seen by the radar.

@jp3630 7 ай бұрын

I mean the fact you had to explain that...and his comment got up voted too.@@manteca2132

@Ghastly_Grinner 7 ай бұрын

That's a problem for the ukranians 😂

@donaldlyons17 7 ай бұрын

@@Ghastly_Grinner Mines don't know who is on them it is a problem for anyone who runs across them!!!

@adeedaas8966 7 ай бұрын

You should see what’s been happening to them when they’re hit by drones

@d73d 6 ай бұрын

Это конечно забавно, но дрону еще долететь до них надо, маленький наверное проскочит

@MohammedKaan 5 ай бұрын

Do you mean shahd drones? 😂

@prolebenz251 Ай бұрын

"Missle speed mach 2,9" Mig-25: so what youre saying is it cant catch me

@AkyJLa_ Ай бұрын

Yeah, mig-25 is a funny thing. -why would i fight them, when i can just outrun

@lemniscatelogos7917 7 ай бұрын

Why does something so destructive and so expensive look so good

@Ghastly_Grinner 7 ай бұрын

Beacuse it is

@120mmsmoothbore2 6 ай бұрын

@@Ghastly_Grinner No it isn't. These things are being obliterated by Himars with scour drones, just look at Oryx.

@Ghastly_Grinner 6 ай бұрын

@@120mmsmoothbore2 HIMARS stopped being a threat to Russian forces about a month after they were deployed 😂😂

@120mmsmoothbore2 6 ай бұрын

@@Ghastly_Grinner Himars are still being used to destroy Russian targets, you can find proof of this of Oryx and seeing how many of the newly destroyed SAM and EW systems have been hit by them.

@daveblueballz6659 6 ай бұрын

@@Ghastly_GrinnerOryx doesn't lie.

@Bigweave74 7 ай бұрын

All that money and it cant intecept a drone moving at 40mph

@1who2what3where4when 7 ай бұрын

Neither can Ukraine

@hunterno7704 7 ай бұрын

Nobody can

@BreadPittAAAAHHHH 7 ай бұрын

These are made for fast and big missiles and jets not for some cheap chinese drone from wish so no shit sherlock

@issdahjuac5833 7 ай бұрын

drones are quite different from aircraft you should know most of these systems were built to detect aircraft sized objects and one of the only reasons countries build so many drones and anti-drone defense systems is not to lose many equipments as Russia lost in Ukraine. Just know there will always be someone to learn from

@120mmsmoothbore2 6 ай бұрын

@@hunterno7704 Both Ukraine and Russia have shown they're capable of shooting down drones, yet Russia is the only one losing these "air defence" systems to drones lol b

@GAB-vq7re 7 ай бұрын

Yup really wish humanity could stop going to war. If the world's super powers ever go to war again it is going to be absolutely horrific.

@Bungolsikuya 3 ай бұрын

I thought this was war thunder fo a second

@wovada 5 ай бұрын

In 6 minutes, the rocket flies to a target at a distance of 300 km.

@ddff3618 3 ай бұрын

300km ? LOL

@afiqdanial3053 3 ай бұрын

@@ddff3618 10km is the limit it use the same rocket as tunguska edit: it use different missile from tunguska but more modern 95ya6 has less than 15km of range so no way this can exceed 20km let alone 300km

@Haka3103aas 2 ай бұрын

30км ~

@wovada 2 ай бұрын

Это тоже неплохо. Самолет уничтожит любой в радиусе 30 км.@@Haka3103aas

@iccctepika Ай бұрын

Похоже на правду. Но 5к+@@afiqdanial3053

@gbthecamper458 7 ай бұрын

But it is continually being destroyed by drones in Ukraine. Interesting!😂

@jotaro2690 7 ай бұрын

Same for the patriot

@sanjayrathore1341 6 ай бұрын

One brahmos can destroy the whole site 😂

@MasterNeoRNCP 7 ай бұрын

When it comes to rocket, radar Russians are in another league. On the other hand when it comes to Air craft carriers US is in a different league..

@brockvegas9571 7 ай бұрын

Now show how easy they burn when taken out by a $500 FPV drone!

@Viaches 6 ай бұрын

Ну покажи нам как ? Сказки тут выдумываешь

@samplechannel2fiyd5idjfufjfud 6 ай бұрын

In your country it would cost 500k

@havanasyndrome3024 6 ай бұрын

Drones are something that no military knows how to deal with at the moment. Looks at Bradleys, Leopards and Challengers get taken out by Russian lancet drones...

@brockvegas9571 6 ай бұрын

"Looks at Bradleys, Leopards and Challengers get taken out by Russian lancet drones..." @@havanasyndrome3024 Thing is.. when the NATO hardware is hit, the crews tend to survive and fight on another day... unlike the poor fuckers in Russian made APCs that seem to catch fire to small arms.

@havanasyndrome3024 6 ай бұрын

@@brockvegas9571 you mean in Western junk you get to burn alive from a $500 drone. 😂😂😂. I don't know where you see Russian APCs catching fire from small arms fire, getting hit by a artillery is not considered small fire goofy..

@drgonzo305 6 ай бұрын

It’s only weakness are all airborne threats

@lordinquisitorstefanauster846 6 ай бұрын

I always thought that it was a bunch of farmers with tractors or an infantry man with atgms hiding behind a tree.

@drgonzo305 6 ай бұрын

@@lordinquisitorstefanauster846 those too, a lot of threats

@havanasyndrome3024 6 ай бұрын

This is TOR not Patriot buddy. How did your patriots do when Iran bombed American military base in Iraq? 😂😂😂

@drgonzo305 6 ай бұрын

@@havanasyndrome3024 perfectly in all the places protected by a patriot battery, remind me how many Americans soldiers did Iran kill or even injure in these attacks? How’s the A-50 S-400 combo working? Ohhh yeah, the A-50 was shot down by Patriot 🤣

@havanasyndrome3024 6 ай бұрын

@@drgonzo305 🤡, Iran actually gave your heads up about an upcoming attack. Because they are civilized unlike your clowns who love not only soldier deaths but adore targeting civilians.. Despite the warning 110 of your terrorists ended up with a traumatic brain injury. With doesn't say much since most Amerikkkunts who join the military are braindamaged to start with.. So, goofy were were your Patriots? About the A50 do you think the Ukrainikunts would admit to using the old Soviet S200 (which is most likely what was used)? Of course not, they aren't getting paid to do that, they are paid to promote American garbage. Oh and did you see the story about Zelenskyy regime just imprisoning 4 people for 12 years for publishing a video of Kinzhal hitting a target right in the middle of Kyyv a month ago? Were are the Patriots and why wasn't air sirens blasting? It sure looks like your garbage not only failed too intercept, it failed to detect Kinzhal in the first place.

@WestTexasStyle 7 ай бұрын

Incoming I Ran 🤣

@Bobbyboom413 Ай бұрын

Only see these videos of this weapon being demonstrated on a nice calm sunny day. Let's see how well it works in rain with hurricane force winds.

@dustinandtarynwolfe5540 7 ай бұрын

When you need to fire a missile while running for your damn life because a 200 dollar fpv drones about to drop a small grenade on you and destroy your multi million dollar truck

@tsaba2319 7 ай бұрын

Hihi ....😂

@wai-sunchia6190 7 ай бұрын

1kg of C4 is not a "small grenade". It gives a big boom!😂😂

@Taluvian 7 ай бұрын

1kg is small compared to what is in artillery shells, missiles, and air dropped bombs.

@DarkMatterX1 7 ай бұрын

@@Taluvian Buy it's about 5x as much as in a standard grenade. Grenades typically pack about 150 - 200g of Comp B or equivalent explosive. Comp B is slightly more brisant than C4. Not enough to make up for the weight difference though.

@bear76009 7 ай бұрын

As I explained above the $200 is nonsense 2000$? Ok I'll buy that. You can't even have a drone for 200 that can fly much beyond your line of sight let alone CARRY anything besides itself

@sebastianlahns8023 7 ай бұрын

cant see a drone before being hit

@17_35 7 ай бұрын

😢

@imsobaasik8709 7 ай бұрын

The radar on top: -_-

@internetresearchagency2238 7 ай бұрын

A new report by British military thinktank RUSI published on May 19th claims that Ukraine is losing an incredible 10,000 drones a month, mainly due to Russian electronic jamming.

@sebastianlahns8023 7 ай бұрын

@@internetresearchagency2238 same goes for the russians jamming is not a one way thing

@deven6518 7 ай бұрын

This is one of the systems that down thousands of drones a month. The drones work by spam. The 8 and 16 missile versions will both run out eventually. That being said, I can swear I've seen countless telegram videos of superior western radars getting the lights out from drones. 😮

@The_Yippee_Kay 5 ай бұрын

Imagine if you infinity missile inside. All you can do left is only moving around.

@sotirzvanidjubre4109 5 ай бұрын

Serbia bought Chinese version,HQ-17,which is reverse engineered Tor,but its completely digitalized and actually more advanced. And its on wheels not tracks.

@AbuHajarAlBugatti 5 ай бұрын

Who needs enemies when you have friends like serbia

@TheArklyte 7 ай бұрын

Unlike Pantsir this guy is practically ideal for it's niche. The missile is a bit dated, but otherwise okayish product for most militaries. What's the problem with the missile? Existence of Pantsir-M2 and Buk-M3. It's not a close range system since that one is covered by Pantsir and in russian own sources latest Tor is inferior to latest Buk by range by about 2 times at least. No one is going to buy 15 different systems to cover variable factions of 40km half sphere. Even russians themselves don't. So they need to decide if Buk-M3 or Tor-M2 would be staying and update the remaining system to cover the niche fully. As it stands, Tor-M2 is apparently competing even with ukraino-belarusian Osa-1T/Stilet T-38. And that's heavily modified Osa. Tl:dr cool, but apparently redundant even for Russia itself vehicle.

@bonaanayaga 7 ай бұрын

Warfare has changed so they will keep all. When you make them you keep a few of both and just upgrade the missles

@hypersonichobo4263 7 ай бұрын

I think the bigger issue is that it is far outranged by air dropped munitions such as GBU-53 and HAARM

@anthonyinzerillo2804 7 ай бұрын

@@hypersonichobo4263yes

@TheArklyte 2 ай бұрын

Those are the problem of longer ranged SAMs that need to intercept the planes AND of Pantsir... that should be modernized to be able to serve in CIWS/CRAM capacity to intercept munitions and drones. Which would require an update of optoelectronic system to be able to reliably operate in all conditions without radar giving you away to HARM, an update of munituons to implement programmable airburst munitions aka AHEAD and update of electronics and software to be able to track small projectiles and objects. Which would result in basically a new system. Which Russia can't handle. But I was commenting on Tor-M2, not on Pantsir. @@hypersonichobo4263

@TheArklyte 2 ай бұрын

@@bonaanayaga when you make them, you pay for them. Having several too specialised systems results in less systems overall as you can't reap the benefits of economy of scale. You choose one and then saturate you capacity to the point where you have attritional reserve. Then you have freedom of what to do next.

@Trompunitalphapropan 7 ай бұрын

Ya but can they work in an actual war? No not really.

@KHETTIUS 7 ай бұрын

yup there's always one retard in comment section.

@spidersaremean8917 4 ай бұрын

What makes you say this lol? The TORs kill record is unknown besides public videos of it taking down missiles and drones which...is what it was made for.

@NTHR_DNKGaming 7 ай бұрын

Gets destroyed by an 80 dollar drone

@Dead4ev1 7 ай бұрын

An 80 dollar drone with the right payload would also destroy most of any US high tech u ignorant sheep

@speedy01247 7 ай бұрын

$800 but you make a good point.

@christinarieser2025 7 ай бұрын

Very good point but do you think this does not apply for an avanger or iris - t as well?

@NTHR_DNKGaming 7 ай бұрын

@@christinarieser2025 I think it applies for both, but differently. American air defense is arguably much better. But it’s not impossible.

@NTHR_DNKGaming 7 ай бұрын

@@christinarieser2025 also, merry Christmas my friend, I hope you and your family are well ❤️

@callisto985 3 ай бұрын

There goes our universal healthcare

@ryan9017 5 ай бұрын

Order me one brother 😂. My new home protection device.

@nifty3000 7 ай бұрын

That rocket cost more than taking a homless guy off the streets and giving him a home. Edit: Just to clarify, this only applies to Americans, they'll pay 800k for a missile only to miss anyway.

@Kopserulii 7 ай бұрын

Wow!! where can I purchase the home that cheap?

@SakakiDash 7 ай бұрын

Giving a homeless guy a home rarely solves the problem.

@gratefulguy4130 7 ай бұрын

@@SakakiDash Says who? Lol

@estoncastillo8258 7 ай бұрын

@@gratefulguy4130 taxes, debt keeping up with other house payments, making a living

@fj1659 7 ай бұрын

A tinyhouse maybe xD

@FastPaull 7 ай бұрын

Hey these are those things that are getting blown up by $1000 toy drones.

@a.v.gavrilov 6 ай бұрын

Not $1000 "your toy drone", - $30 your handmade (DIY, Do It Yourself) drone! Long range FPV drone with 50 km (for directlink) range price - $30! In 33 times cheaper then your toy drone price!

@SCARFACE-gp4fy 6 ай бұрын

Where is this happening where you present when this happened? Did you see this with your own eyes? Please tell me I need to know

@kevintewey1157 6 ай бұрын

And Kinzal Missles 😂

@kevintewey1157 6 ай бұрын

@@SCARFACE-gp4fyif you want to find the information there is a lot

@FastPaull 6 ай бұрын

@user-pi1kn8dg2s Sure, but there's a ton of DJI drones in use which $1000+

@calebjames4949 6 ай бұрын

I think this is the same thing that was blown up by an FPV drone and there was a massive explosion 😮

@krog9483 6 ай бұрын

«Тор» - советский и российский всепогодный тактический зенитный ракетный комплекс, предназначенный для решения задач противовоздушной и противоракетной обороны на уровне дивизионного звена

@davidelliott5843 7 ай бұрын

If these things were really so good, why can’t they stop Storm Shadow or even long range fixed wing drones? Then again, they are great at shooting down Russian aircraft?

@imrekalman9044 7 ай бұрын

They can and do. The pro-Ukraine media just won't show it. Like the much talked about Storm Shadow strike on Sevastopol, everyone talks about the 3 that made it, nobody mentions the other 9 that were shot down. That's how propaganda works.

@BreadPittAAAAHHHH 7 ай бұрын

Storm shadows, haven’t heard them in ages Oh wait that’s probably cause they get jammed and shot down more than they hit 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@northman7946 3 ай бұрын

This sh#t is shot down in hundreds daily. Only tiny fraction sometimes reach vicinity of targets. Meanwhile Ukraine is hammered across all her territory