Join this channel to get access to perks: / @talkfootballty2025
Пікірлер: 33
@piusotu2461Ай бұрын
Point of correction, Pochetino was not sacked because of what you mentioned. Pochetino wasn't even sacked in the first he left due to mutual consent. He wanted more control over tranfers and players meanwhile the owners of the club wanted a YES man because of this, the both parties mutually agreed to part ways
@Dr-fo4rtАй бұрын
You are so good with these analysis, well done 👍
@anthonygachau4298Ай бұрын
Great analysis Bro… we highly appreciate your work and opinion.
@gigordon2000Ай бұрын
Caicedo is so good 💯
@rohanfranklin649Ай бұрын
Enzo Fernandez was somewhat good Under Potter simply becuz he came to Chelsea when the midfield lack confidence and they would work Enzo...but Under Poch they have signed better players than Enzo and he needs to work for them in which he cannot do becuz he's a luxury player. That is why the system works better with Galagher becuz he works for Palmer and Ceicado. Only way this system will work unless Dewsbury will play the Galagher role and push Palmer at right wing which make sense, but the key player is Dewsbury to give Enzo and Caceido that midfield balance, however, Cucurella inverting will give Enzo the freedom to play higher up the pitch and have defensive covering at the same time. GUSTO TOSIN COLWIL CUCU CACEIDO ENZO PALMER DEWSBURY NKUNKU JACKSON REAL POWER HOUSE TEAM THAT HAVE BALANCE ON EITHER SIDE
@florme6494Ай бұрын
Enzo I see more like Rodri. Our left back inverts, allowing Enzo to have the potential to move forward to shoot. But as a whole, he does not use much energy rarely moving to the sides. He will be the brain. I really enjoy someone who understands the player who moves the least yet is the most comfortable and intelligent on the ball is also the player that’s most protected. Enzo like Jorginho, Rodri, Busquets and Pep himself have never been the most athletic players. They make up for it with game intelligent and the organiser both with the ball and off the ball. They are the first receiver from the CB’s and everywhere else including striker. They can always be trusted with the ball. It’s like drawing a circle, in the middle of that circle is Enzo. The only player on the field that can connect any position with himself to receive or to distribute to. Now, this is important because he can’t always be free. The inverting full back along with the 8, 10 and 9 will all come inside that circle when Enzo is marked and have to be very comfortable in possession to play bounce passes enlarging the circle until a gap appears to break outside the circle which is creating an opportunity or scoring from an opportunity. Caicedo is the legs and bounce passer. The number 8. Either Dewsbury or Palmer are the 10 who creates, drives and scores. Lavia and Santos are more the question for me. Where do they fit in?
@davebern4238Ай бұрын
Lavia will compete with Enzo in that position.
@davebern4238Ай бұрын
Santos will learn from Enzo
@JacksonXunderbrianАй бұрын
This is very mach correct 💯
@WisdomMudoloАй бұрын
Good analyse
@user-bu2wt7db5zАй бұрын
I swear I have been waiting for this video
@MARJONYLEWINTONАй бұрын
I swear, you are lying. 😂😂😂
@adb8411Ай бұрын
Think Lavia (when fit) would be a better deep lying play-maker than Enzo
@MorahEbuka-vm5gpАй бұрын
Move palmer to the right..enzo, caiecedo/lavia, hall..our midfield is set
@KareemkahelАй бұрын
Why are you still putting Olise? 😢 When it's now clear that we won't be getting him. As always, I really love your analysis
@talkfootballty2025Ай бұрын
Miss typed
@Favour12663Ай бұрын
Perfectly said 💪💙
@Otnas13Ай бұрын
Lovely analysis. I knew Enzo played out of his favourite position thus he struggle under porch
@rohanfranklin649Ай бұрын
What is Enzo favourate position? The real reason why he thrived under Potter is becuz players did work for him and the team play badly becuz of that....but under Poch, Chelsea have sign better midfielders in which he needs to work for them an he failed at that. That is why Galagher fit Poch system an not Enzo becuz Gallagher works for Palmer and Caceido so the team was more balance. I would say Enzo is a falls 8 and a deep lying number 10 player, not good at any. The prem is too physical for him, the reason why Caceido, Palmer and Gallagher are better becuz they are Premeir proven, they have a better CV an have adopted to league. There is a player in Enzo but if he cannot run as much as Gallagher he he is going to expose Caceido again and again. Bless!
@AkanbiKayode-lj7yfАй бұрын
I hope it worked out
@lejpngАй бұрын
With Dewsbury-Hall coming in they might be a change of plan as he and Palmer will be the two 8/10.
@ELISHAATIGBIАй бұрын
Omo there will be big problem in Chelsea midfield
@RONSANDHUАй бұрын
I have listened to such analysis, lately most of the times you get it wrong!
@WisdomMudoloАй бұрын
Good analyse 11:16
@rohanfranklin649Ай бұрын
Nice Analysis but you keep brining up videos from Potter days when he was the best...but Chelsea have bought better midfielders since then which change is position. However, Caceido is better at the 6 position so he was forced play higher up in which he fails to cover grounds that exposes Caceido. Enzo is terrible at the 8 position becuz he doesnt cover grounds like Gallagher. Mr Potter builds the team around Enzo and we score like 4 goals in 3 months....but Poch build the team around Palmer, Gallagher and Caceido so we were more fluid offensively and strong defensively.
@coachdom2142Ай бұрын
I think we should not force enzo if he doesnt fit in our team
@mmsjejrinside385Ай бұрын
Lol
@anthonyremy7352Ай бұрын
Pouch wasnt sacked man....he left due to a disagreement.....
@coachdom2142Ай бұрын
You are wrong caicedo hqs just played only for poch
@simonjuma6849Ай бұрын
Enzo may suffer here. He is slow now that KDH has been signed from Leicester city.
@talkfootballty2025Ай бұрын
Working on it now
@HenryNuelАй бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂u wish,just wait and see, there's no player in Chelsea midfield that can play that DLPM than Enzo