Which Is Better? | Lumix S 100mm F2.8 vs Canon RF 100mm F2.8L

Рет қаралды 1,320

Күн бұрын

Which lens is better? Image quality? Specifications? Build quality? Autofocus? Olivia answers all these questions in this video. Watch the full video to see what her verdict is!
Pre-order Now:
Panasonic Lumix S 100m F2.8 Macro Lens: bit.ly/3tAqWyo
Buy Now:
Canon RF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM Lens: bit.ly/3LO4l69
Canon EOS R6 Mark II Body: bit.ly/3DtCAM3
Panasonic Lumix S5II Body: bit.ly/3WSNTFA
Equipment used to create this video:
Sony ZV-E1 Full-frame Mirrorless Vlog Camera: bit.ly/440q9DF
Sony FE 24-70 F2.8 GM II Lens: bit.ly/36N4er8
Rode Wireless Go II Microphone: bit.ly/42Z8gVp
ProMaster Professional Carbon Fibre Tripod & Head: bit.ly/3CYffBw
ProMaster Filter 82mm Variable ND - Digital HGX (1.3-8 stops): bit.ly/3LQ1IQ7
MORE from Wilkinson Cameras:
Website: www.wilkinson.co.uk/
TikTok: / wilkinsoncameras
Facebook: / wilkinsoncameras
Instagram: / wilkinsoncameras
Twitter: / wilkicameras
Blog at www.wilkinson.co.uk/w/blog/
Content:
00:00 - Introduction
01:22 - Set Up 1
02:29 - Build & Design
03:16 - Autofocus & Image Stabilisation
04:00 - Set Up 2 & 3
04:35 - Image Quality
05:20 - Features
06:00 - Minimum Focusing Distance
06:27 - Personal Opinion
08:24 - Which Is Better?
10:40 - Final Scores
#Lumix #Canon #MacroPhotography

Пікірлер: 16

@Snapit551 4 ай бұрын

Excellent video 👌

@WilkinsonCameras 3 ай бұрын

Thank you 👍

@moneyboys2010 3 ай бұрын

Came to see the comparison on these 2. As a Full Time Shooter, we are splitting hairs here 😂 either will work the Client never……, I mean never…. debates this level of detail.

@mbismbismb 4 ай бұрын

Canon did a great job on their RF L series glass that others hard to catch up

@harryvlogs7833 3 ай бұрын

Not really the canon lens is terrible it's macro to infinity focus is terrible

@mbismbismb 3 ай бұрын

@@harryvlogs7833 u certainly havent watch the video yet

@harryvlogs7833 3 ай бұрын

@mbismbismb yeah I have its not even a proper macro lens and autofocus isn't good. The Canon has a lot of focus breathing

@harryvlogs7833 3 ай бұрын

@@mbismbismb hear watch from the focus breathing part of the video

@mbismbismb 3 ай бұрын

@@harryvlogs7833 i'm sorry but if u use r3 it has focus breathing compensation... fyi

@jameshenry6855 3 ай бұрын

I don't know why you gave the price as a draw when you said one cheaper than the other?

@PavSZ 4 ай бұрын

Both great lenses in their own right but why would you compare them side by side? Asking for a friend 😉

@WilkinsonCameras 4 ай бұрын

1... because we could! 2. Because the Canon EF macro lens is almost legendary, so when people are looking to switch from their DSLR system, this lens may be a deciding factor for them when choosing between Canon and Lumix S. We decided not to include Nikon, Sony and 3rd party in the lineup as there's not actually any like-for-like lenses, they're all different focal lengths!

@PavSZ 4 ай бұрын

@@WilkinsonCameras fair point!

@baihu4u 3 ай бұрын

Hoping you'll do a Lumix S 100mm 2.8 macro vs Sigma 105mm 2.8 macro for us Lumix ang L-Mount shooters.

@ghalibsworld 4 ай бұрын

Canon is not that much interested in bringing RFS APS-C lenses for their system as they did for their EF-M. RF-S will have exactly the same number of lenses that EF-M has or less. Canon mistakenly to not follow their popular EF-M 15-45mm kit lens for their RF-S system. Now they can allow their old Sigma partner who saved their EF-M system with their 16, 30 and 56mm F1.4 trio. For general purposes, Canon's full-frame lens line is full and if you have the money you can go for it. But APS-C is not even compatible with Sony, or Nikon APS-C lineup. That is why Z50 is gaining market although it is not even close to their R10. So I will beg Canon to bring an overall zoom lens (Like old EF-S 17-55 f2.8) and some good prime like EF-M 22m F2 or 32mm F1.4. Please consider a good kit lens instead of a useless 18-45mm F4.5-6.3. And allow Sigma to bring at least four or five very demanding lenses. Or Stop advertising for APS-C. BTW, I own an R10 (unfortunately).