🎬WATCH ME NEXT 🎬 ✅Are the GENEALOGIES in the Bible REALLY as boring as they look? kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fstzgZumtJnIfoU.html ✅Why are there TWO creations accounts in the Bible? kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ptqoZNWlt9GdaYU.html ✅Why did God ask JACOB what his name is? kzfaq.info/get/bejne/kMeCprmg2N-rj3k.html SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE 👉🏼 bit.ly/masterpiece_bible HOW DOES THE BIBLE WORK? 👉🏼 bit.ly/howdoesthebiblework MORE FREE RESOURCES FOR YOUR BIBLE STUDY 👉🏼 www.masterpiece.bible/ GERMAN CHANNEL 👉🏼 kzfaq.info MORE DISCOVERIES IN THE BOOK OF GENESIS: 👉🏼 bit.ly/discoveriesingenesis

the "Sons of God" are mentioned in the book of Job 1:6 and they are seen as heavenly beings in the verse

How are we to handle Job 1:6, 2:1 and 38:7? The use of sons of God here are clearly about angels? Also, how would we then determine the origin of the nephilim or ‘giants’?

Wow! This is the best explanation I’ve heard for these verses. I’ve watched quite a few videos and read commentary about this but never felt like the interpretation was based on the context of the Bible. I think many people hold to the idea that the Sons of God were angels to explain why there were giants in those days. But Jesus said that in heaven we’d be like the angels that don’t marry. So I’ve always thought it was illogical to think this passage indicates angels having children with people. I really enjoy your videos and always get new insights into to the text that I hadn’t seen before. Thank you!

Keep posting these! You give such great explanations and in the process we learn how to better study and interpret the Bible for ourselves. Thank you Chris for this great ministry.

Wow. I knew we didn’t need the book of Enoch, the Bible is all we need! You blew my mind brother!! God bless you and your channel. Thank you.

Right on brother. I’ve been teaching the same thing in my church for years. At one point I even read the whole book of Enoch just to see what it had to say, but clearly the book of Enoch is nothing but Jewish mythology. And if the sons of God were angels, we would expect God to judge the angels as well as man in Genesis 6. In fact, that’s what God did in Genesis, chapter 3, when Satan tempted Eve to sin. The fact that nominal believers living in sin brought judgment should be a warning to the world today. Thanks for putting this post out.

Amen! Thanks - so refreshing - no hocus-pokus! Just plain reading and comparing scripture with scripture . That nailed it!

This is bu far THE best explanation to these verses to me. Thank you! I struggled with the possible idea that "fallen angels" slept with human woman and such, I couldn't wrap my mind around that. So, this makes MUCH more sense. Thank you.

This explanation speaks true to me. I've heard lots of other possibilities but none feel right, this feels correct. I'll have to pray on it. Thanks for this video.

It's 12.00 AM and I'm seriously watching your video. I'm glad I found it. God bless you for giving such a wonderful explanation.

Brilliant! Like all of us, I had heard all kinds of speculation about this strange chapter 6. Your view is the simplest, clearest and most revealing of all of them, the others seem like science fiction fantasies in comparison. Congratulations.

This subject always worried me.. but this explanation is both logical and rational and puts a new prospective to my belief system. Thanks you.

Best and most logical explanation of that text. Some would make it more sensational but we want truth. Thank you

First I watched this video and then the video by Inspiring Philosophy on the the same subject. I was reminded of the truth of Proverbs 18:17 "In a lawsuit the first to speak seems right, until someone comes forward and cross-examines."

This is the best explanation thus far.

Thank you! Great explanation. Blessings 🙌🏾

When someone truly studies it shows. Great job!!!

I think the "sons of God" were humans beings who were faithful to God and God counted on them to live for Him but they disappointed Him by doing what the wicked people on earth did and also by going into them by marrying them without the concerns of God. For example, Noah could also be part of the sons of God who lived differently to please God other than following the stepss of the rest of humans on earth. God had expected his faithful ones who He called His sons to have lived to please Him but did not and rather saw the beatutiful daughter of men, where men here refers to the wicked humans on earth. So in order to distincquish between the humans who please God and the ones who did not, the word "sons of God" was used. For example, both christians and non-christians are all men created by God but the distinction comes in when christians call themselves sons of God because they have come to believe in Jesus and have been born again by the Holy Spirit.

Bravo! This is how you properly exegete a text. The law of biogenesis debunks angels mating with humans and producing offspring.

Genesis 4 and 5 were the missing links to Genesis 6 that we needed here. Context is everything and these 2 verses explain two different geneologies mixing in Genesis 6. I cant believe how twisted people make Genesis 6 out to be with Angels. Angels are spirits not flesh and bone. Malachi 3:1 prophesies a messenger in John the Baptist who was born of flesh and bone from a (woman). To say Genesis 19:1 were Angels from heaven in the flesh is a farce. Messengers (Angels) are helpers and appear in scripture as messengers but messengers in the flesh are men messengers. There are other verses that prove men born of a woman were messengers in numerous places and not Angels. Great vid! Shalom!

THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR PUTTING THIS TOGETHER SO CLEARLY - AND HOW IT ALL FALLS INTO PLACE. I also believe Jesus holds the key to understanding the text about the 'sons of God' marrying the daughters of men. In John's Gospel chapter 10 verses 34 to 36 (when the Jews threatened to stone Jesus for claiming to be God) ... " Jesus answered them, "Is it not written in your law, 'I have said you are gods'? ...... and goes on to say - "IF HE CALLED THEM 'GODS' TO WHOM THE WORD OF GOD CAME - AND THE SCRIPTURE CANNOT BE BROKEN - what about the one whom the Father set apart on His very own and sent into the world ?" To my mind this absolutely clarifies the whole subject, and I thank God that all we need to know is hidden in His Word.

THIS is a perfect example of using CORRECT Biblical exegesis!!! Gracias hermano

Thank you this is exactly the way God showed it to me and I have had many debates with people over the years that believed that the fallen angels and humans had offspring and it was the line of Seth crossing with the line of cain thank you

Excellent exegesis, especially the parallel with the language of Gen. 3 when Eve sees that the fruit is good and takes it.

This also parallels what happens to Solomon when he took wives from foreign lands. It leads to his downfall.

The other context being fallen angels actually makes more sense considering the sons of God mentioned in Job 1 and Job 37 obviously represents spiritual beings. Also the depravity brought in by this unholy union was passed on through the giants that played a major part in leading the nations away from Yahweh to follow the other gods. Babylon was founded and influenced by these nephelim. They introduced brutality into human society and used their power and superiority to deceive the people that lived under their rule. The angels chained in the underworld are these.angels.that left this normal.aboad.

I want to point out the Adam is called the "son of God" in Luke 3:38 which that the Genealogy of Adam is the godly line called the "sons of God" as you point in Matthew 5:9 and Romans 8:14.

The biggest flaw I see with the sons of God just being wicked powerful rulers or Cain's evil line is what was the point in the Flood when similar people such as Nimrod, Og and Goliath walked the Earth afterwards. Clearly there's something more about this product of the sons of God and daughters of men that caused God to commence the Flood.

Job 38:7 indicates that the “sons of God” are angelic beings “Whereupon were the foundations thereof fastened? Or who laid the corner-stone thereof, When the morning stars sang together, And all the sons of God shouted for joy?” ‭‭Job‬ ‭38‬:‭6‬-‭7‬ ‭

Wow.... that's incredible. Thank you, man 🙏🏽

If they were simply human then why aren’t their offspring simply human? Apologies if you mentioned the Nephilim but it seems you avoided that all together.

For sure , he who does the will of God is considered to be the son of God , Noah as the blood line of Seth Adams son , the daughter of his lineage were taken by Cains sons giving rise to generations of perdition full of evil and could be the reason why God decided to destroy the whole creation. Angels can never marry . Thanks for this explanation.

So the Sons of God appear elsewhere, and in one case are even called "gods." (Psalm 82:6) Deuteronomy 32:8 says the nations were divided by the number of the Sons of God. Daniel talks about how all the princes (sons of the King) except Michael have turned against the Most High (Daniel 10:21) The Sethite view only comes about because of St. Augustine.

This is exactly what is wrong with Bible teachers. Total and complete lack of exegetical work. There is a context that is also completely ignored. If you want a deep dive into these passage read the book by Dr Heiser Reversing Hermon. Him and the majority of biblical scholars disagree with the Sethite view as it falls from context with just examining the text in Hebrew as it does not follow English grammar being that these two languages do not have a natural link. Therefore, English interpretation of the Bible needs first Hebrew understanding followed by historical context.

This was a helpful video; this is called Perspicuity of the Scripture. You have to use scripture to interpret less clear verses of scripture. When a Bible study leans on an external perspective to understand the Bible (evolution or recent PHD perspectives…) which relies on confusing and non-obvious premises; you’re probably not doing it right.

Sir ur bible study class is amazing and God will blessed u a lot

Hello sir please uploads your video we are always waiting for your video .bcz your explain is from god 💞💞( i am from Nepal love you )

Thank you...I was having some trouble reading and understanding the bible but you really helped me

Concise and to the point. Thanks sir

Superb explanation. I think its enough for thise who believe about strange marriages of human and other creatures.

Now that was a Biblical and contextual presentation on the topic. Very good breakdown into the scripture. Very good spiritual application.

This doesn’t explain the Nephilim…

What about Enoch?? That is what this pertains to if you research Enoch. I respect anyone who shares The Bible. I just needed to express that this is pertaining to Enoch. The book that was removed from the Bible.

Hmmm... You've given me something to think about. I'd never looked at it that way. I'd always taken the view; that Elohiym _(term used in Genesis chapter one for God),_ does not always mean God. _(Which it doesn't. It means; "One of authority and with many powers.")_ Not sure if I 100% agree with your summation, your thoughts, but there is something to them, that is logical, and cannot be denied. Just, yours might not be the whole of it. This needs thoughts and prayers. So thank you, for your insightful video. I've subscribed; and gave it a like, because of it.

In genesis 6 :1 the bible says when "men began to multiply "... which was natural men then in verse 2 it talked about sons of men( which were supernatural men you see there is a clear distinction in that context between the men and the sons of men. So the sons of God in that contex are supernatural beings that was why they produced giants according to their kind. Let's study scripture in contex and objectively.

The sons of God are God's divine counsel

Wonderful! Someone finally gets it right. I have had a personal Angel encounter and I know that angels can have masculine or feminine attributes but do not have reproductive abilities. They are spirit messagers to bear messages and minister to those who are to receive salvation. They are in full submission to God and are not to be worshiped.

This is a fascinating topic, one we can agree to disagree on without being rude or nasty. Here is what two of my favorite scholars have to say on this topic. The term "sons of God" (Heb. beney' ha- Elohim) is used in the Old Testament of either angels or men who were true believers, committed to the service of God. Passages that refer to angels as beney' ha- Elohim include Job 1:6; 2:1; 38:7 Psalms 29:1; 89:6 (89:7 MT). The Masoretic text does not contain this phrase in Deuteronomy 32:43, but a fragment of a Hebrew text found in Qumran cave 4 reads: "Shout joyously O heavens, with Him, and worship Him O sons of God [beney' ha- Elohim] and ascribed to him might, all you sons of the mighty [bênê 'Ēlîm]. Shout joyously, O nations, concerning His people, and accord strength to Him, all you angels of God [malakhey Elohim]." This is considerably more expanded than the received Hebrew text (MT) of this verse, but it may possibly be the original wording. It was probably the passage quoted in Hebrews 1:6--- though Psalm 97:7 may also be the source for that verse. But the occurrences of beney' ha- Elohim referring to men standing in covenant relationship to God are fully as numerous in the Old Testament as those referring to angels (cf. Deut. 14:1; 32:5; Ps. 73:15; Hos. 1:10 [MT=2:10] ---and we believe Gen. 6:2 as well) The reasons for understanding Genesis 6:2 as referring to members of the covenant family, descendants of the line of Seth, are quite compelling. Scripture clearly teaches that angels are spirits, "ministering spirits sent to serve those who will inherit salvation" (Hebrews 1:14, NIV) While they may on occasion appear in bodily form in the semblance of men, they have no physical bodies and are therefore utterly incapable of carnal relations with women. The rabbinic speculation that angels are referred to in Genesis 6:2 is a curious intrusion of pagan superstition that has no basis at all in the rest of Scripture. The fact that some children of gigantic stature (v.4) resulted from these marriages offers no evidence whatever of angelic paternity. No one claims that the sons of Anak, Goliath and his brothers had any angelic forebears because of their great stature; nor is there any reason to suppose that of the antediluvian giants had supernatural forebears. What Genesis chapter 6:1-2,4 records is the first occurrence of mixed marriage between believers and unbelievers, with a characteristic result of such unions: complete loss of testimony for the Lord and a total surrender of moral standards. In other words, the "sons of God" in this passage were descendants of the godly line of Seth. Instead of remaining true to God and loyal to their spiritual heritage, they allowed themselves to be enticed by the beauty of ungodly women who were "daughters of men"--- that is, of the tradition and example of Cain. The natural result of such marriages was a debasement of nature on the part of the younger generations, until the entire antediluvian civilization sank to the lowest depths of depravity. The Lord saw how great man's wickedness on the earth had become, and that every inclination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil all the time" (v.5, NIV). The inevitable result was judgment, the terrible destruction of the Great Flood. Perhaps one last comment regarding angels would be in order here. If we were to concede that spirits could somehow enter into sexual relations with human beings---which they cannot---then they could not even so be fitted in with this passage here. If they were minions of Satan, that is, fallen angels, then they could not have been referred to as "sons of God." Demons of hell would never be so designated in Scripture. Nor could they have been angels of God, since God's angels always live in total obedience to Him and have no other yearning or desire but to do God's will and glorify His name. A sordid involvement with godless young women would therefore be completely out of character for angels as "sons of God." The only viable explanation therefore, is that the sons of God were descendants of the godly line of Seth. Dr. Gleason L. Archer, Jr. Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties pp. 79-80 Some interpreters claim that in the Old Testament the phrase “sons of God” always refers to angels. The phrase is used in Hosea 1:10 to refer to humans, but advocates of the angels view argue that this phrase cannot mean the same thing as it does in Genesis 6 because Hosea used the singular form of the word “God,” El, whereas the writer of Genesis 6 used the plural form, Elohim. The assumption here is that because these passages do not use precisely the same terms, they are not referring to the same thing. This assumption is incorrect, however, because different words are often used to refer to the same thing. The words El and Elohim are frequently used interchangeably in the Old Testament, and there is no doubt that both passages refer to God. It is not the case, therefore, that “sons of God” always refers to angels. Most advocates of the angels view point to Job 1:6 and 2:1 to support their claim that “sons of God” refers to angels. They argue that since it refers to angels in Job, then it also refers to angels in Genesis 6. In this case the assumption is the opposite of the one above; that is, these passages must refer to the same thing simply because they use the same terms. This is not necessarily true, however. Words or phrases often mean different things or are used differently in different contexts. The phrase “Son of Man,” for example, refers to Ezekiel in the book of Ezekiel, but in the Gospels it refers to Jesus. One must demonstrate from the context of the passages in Genesis and Job that “sons of God” means the same thing in both passages and not simply assume this is the case because the words are the same. The passages in Job are also used to argue that “sons of God” refers to fallen angels. There is nothing in these passages, however, that indicates that they are fallen angels. Job 1:6, for example, says, “the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them.”1 Satan was not one of the sons of God, but came in “among them.” In Job, the reference to the “sons of God” does not include fallen angels such as Satan. Additionally, it seems very unlikely that the expression “sons of God” would be used to refer to fallen angels. This argument incorrectly assumes that the two passages are referring to the same thing simply because they use the same terms. Other commentators appeal to Jude 6-7 to support their contention that the “sons of God” were unfallen or heavenly angels who then fell because they had sexual relations with female humans. They argue that Jude compared the prideful fallen angels to the sexually immoral people of Sodom and Gomorrah. The problem with this assertion is that it assumes what it must prove. Proponents of this argument use their interpretation of Genesis 6 to understand Jude, and then use their understanding of Jude to support their interpretation of Genesis 6. This is circular reasoning. The angels view also assumes that angels can have sexual relations with female humans. Bruce Waltke points out, however, “This interpretation…contradicts Jesus’ statement that angels do not marry (Matt. 22:30; Mark 12:25). It is one thing for angels to eat and drink (see Gen. 19:1-3), but quite another to marry and reproduce.”2 Some interpreters respond that Jesus was referring only to the marriage contract and not to the marriage bed, but this makes Jesus’ statement nonsensical in its own context. Jesus was responding to the question about having a marital relation resulting in children, and He clearly denied that heavenly angels can have sexual relations. Other defenders respond that Jesus is referring to angels in heaven, whereas Genesis 6 is referring to fallen angels. The problem with this explanation is that prior to having sexual relations with female humans, these fallen angels must have been unfallen, heavenly angels; but Jesus said heavenly angels could not have sexual relations, and, therefore, they could not have committed the very act that is supposed to have caused them to fall. Furthermore, this view not only assumes that unfallen angels can have sexual relations with female humans but also that it is necessarily sinful. No commentator has attempted to prove this assumption. Dr. Thomas A. Howe Professor of Bible and Biblical Languages, Southern Evangelical Seminary

Where did the Nephilim come from then? Why did the early Church believe they were angels???

The Hebrew for “sons of god” and “daughters of men” are completely different. The “sons of god” term is always related to spiritual beings and the “daughters of men” is referring to humans. The flood story and the Tower of Babel follow right after. These stories of humanity becoming corrupt because of fallen angels runs all throughout the bible and ancient texts. The interpretation in this video is so basic and fails to capture what the Old Testament and New Testament writers believed about giants and the rebellious angels

Fascinating! I will be following….

The angels were punished and are bound in chains and are mentioned in Jude. There is also mention of this in first Peter.

If the “sons of God” refers to humans, why would their offspring be referred to as “giants” and “Nephilim”?

Soooo good ❤

So clear & simple!..

Great!!

Thank you!

Great exposition! More grace to carry on!

Thank you so much for being able to rightly divide the Word of God. It never ceases to amaze me how many fails to follow a simple story line. Astonishing!!!!!

It also makes sense because i think I recall there are parts of the bible that say something about angels not able to be given in marriage

Makes no sense. How do men from Seth genes and women create giants? Sons of God in the book of JOB are clearly some type of angelic being who is able to go before The Most High and Satan was among them. In Ezekiel, the Angel called him son of man. Mark 2:10 refers to Jesus as Son of man born from Adam, a man. So why not just call them sons of men? Why even make a distinction at all if they were both just men and women? Beause there were gaints in those days before and after the flood, trying to get rid of them. Jude 1:6 And the angels which kept not their first estate but left their own habitation. Which lets you know they had the ability to leave heaven and they did.

This is the absolute truth! My pastor taught us this , & Like the teacher said why would God punish man for what fallen angels did ?Also angels can’t reproduce they don’t have reproductive systems b/c they’re spiritual beings, great teaching sir !

Yeah, I spoke to God and he said it was ridiculous to even think angels were having sex with humans!

How did the giants and "mighty men of renown" (sounds like the Greek titans) come about? Was the line of Seth and the line of Cain so genetically incompatible that the offspring would grow into literal giants and titans?

Amazing

Excellent !

Perhaps I don't understand. Noah is not referenced in Genesis Ch 4 vs. 1:6 Noah was not talked about in the Bible until Genesis 5:29

Thanks ...first person I agree with ...non of the farfetch fallen angel stereotypes. Hallelujah flesh and blood can't reveal it to you ...

Totally agree!!! You got it my friend

Nice Praise the Lord

I think that analyzing this question shows why we have to be very careful about "academic" translations of the Bible from Hebrew. Many Bible translators have been accused, for example, of changing the translation of "virgin' to "young lady" to water down the power of the message of Christ's birth. That even though the context of the story of Mary is that she had never had relations with a man before she gave birth to Jesus. Getting back to this question of the interpretation of "sons of God", depending on which Bible translation you use, Job 1:6 is translated as either "sons of God" or "angels". To the credit of the NIV, it has a footnote that states that the original Hebrew word directly translates to, "sons of God". King James Version leaves Job 1:6 as, "sons of God". The "sons of God" appeared before God, and Satan went with them. Combining this with Genesis 6, I suggest that it makes more sense to infer that the sons of God were heavenly beings with earthly bodies. Cain was human. Intermarriages between humans don't result in giants. The offspring of the sons of God and daughters of men resulted in giant offspring. The descendants of whom included Goliath. So marrying a daughter of Cain, if the daughter acknowledged and gave reverence to God, was not necessarily a sin. Many children acknowledge the mistakes of their parents, and do not necessarily do what their parents did. The Bible does not talk much about ladies. So there is no way of knowing if all the wives of Noah and his sons were only of the bloodline of just Abel and Seth, with no contribution from Cain. Thus, my opinion is that, "sons of God" are heavenly beings with earthly bodies. They were in the world before the flood, and also afterward.

I Don’t see “ Sons of God” used in scripture before chapter 6..

Nope. But kudos for trying to resolve the mystery with a literary approach - I haven't seen that done before.

"some people have entertained angels without knowing it". The fallen ones could certainly not not have mated with women, or could they?

Did you read the book of Enoch?

Go the book of Job and find out who "sons of God" are. How do giants come from regular men?

Thank you sir

Genesis 24:3 And I will make thee swear by the LORD, the God of heaven, and the God of the earth, that thou shalt not take a wife unto my son of the daughters of the Canaanites, among whom I dwell: Exodus 34:16 And thou take of their daughters unto thy sons, and their daughters go a whoring after their gods, and make thy sons go a whoring after their gods.

Mmmmm, nah I still think the 'sons of God' had to be spiritual beings. They are also mentioned in Job 1: "Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them." I imagine these had to be spiritual beings if they were able to present themselves before the Lord. It doesn't make sense for Genesis 6 to mean sons of Seth or any kind of human sons. If that were the case, why is there a contrast between the 'sons of God' and the 'daughters of men'? As if these are strictly two different beings - supernatural beings and human women. Plus it says "that the sons of God saw the daughters of men, that they were beautiful" as if these human women were a new thing to them, as opposed to human men who were already aware of beautiful women and sexual intercourse.

This guy does a ton of mental gymnastics to explain away the most obvious explanation.

Gensis 3 talks of enmity between Satan's seed and Eve's seed. DNA is God's creation, Adams seed was through Seth

Why are you afraid of the MOST LIKELY truth: "fallen angels"? Why does this bother you, and so many others? You accept all of the other parts of the Bible, too include bodily ressurections, and parting of seas and mana from the clouds, but not this? Genesis, Exodus, Numbers, Job, Daniel, Jude, Peter, Matthew, Luke, Revelations and others, too include the popular book of Enoch of course would disagree with you. Very curious. . . .

Thank u all very much

Thanks so much you made it clear ❤

I think that the significance of the term 'Son's of God' still point to something of the divine council. But you certainly made a good case. And point out some important ways to cross reference scripture. Thanks

This is interesting perspective but what about Jude 1:6-7?

_Luke 3:38 Enos, which was the son of _*_Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God._* So the "sons of God " are the descendants of Adam through Seth.

Do you teach JUSTIFIED/saved/enter Heaven by faith eg Eph 2:8-8, Gal 2:16, Rom 4:5 or faith AND WORKS eg Acts 26:20 ?

If the narrative is that way about sons of God you are referring as the line of Seth and daughters of man referring to line of Cain, why don't we have the same giants in our time as the world still shows that there are sons of God and daughters of man people who don't worship God. Those giants were not simple giants incredible in all ares. We have a problem here.

I saw someone say 1st Enoch interpretation is that they were angels?

Great video, I love that scripture defines the scripture without wild speculation. I love that you mentioned God's definition of 'sons of God'. ~ Romans 8:14; "For all who are being led by the Spirit of God, these are sons of God." Is there evidence that God's Spirit was leading in Genesis 6? ~ Genesis 6:2-3; ... the ‘sons of God’ saw that the ‘daughters of men’ were beautiful; and they took wives for themselves, whomever they chose. ‘Then’ the LORD said, “My ‘Spirit’ shall not ‘ABIDE’ with ‘MAN’ forever, because he also is flesh; nevertheless, his days shall be one hundred and twenty years.” Why does God immediately proclaim that He is removing His 'Spirit' from ‘MAN’? Because God will not share His glory with another pagan false god. What fellowship has light with darkness? ~ Deuteronomy 7:3-4; "Furthermore, you shall not intermarry with them; you shall not give your daughters to their sons, nor shall you take their daughters for your sons. For they will turn your sons away from following Me to serve other gods; Then the anger of the Lord will be kindled against you, and He will quickly destroy you."

Men began to multiply and Sons of God are two different beings

Forgotten verse here is Gen 6:4: "..... , ." (NKJV), meaning they were 'valiant' men who were 'ancient' and 'reputable'. Doesn't sound like evil men, even though being thought of as the Nephilim, nor do they sound like angels. Described as giants, their character relates more to being noble than wicked, yet skimmed over like the sons-of-God being angels. No mention of their origins either, so are they part of the original creation, but not important enough to be part of the main genealogy including Jesus?

Finally someone with commong sense. Christendom is filled with pagan beliefs from the heathens. Adam was the first high priest and the line continued through seth. The sons od seth abandoned their priesthood and adopted (married) pagan beliefs. The priesthood ended and there was no intercessor between god and man. Hence why the world went crazy

Accurate! This is exactly how the Lord revealed it to me as well. This Enochian Magic released by those who are deceived by it’s heretic book called Enoch” must pray that they would allow God to open up their understanding and preach the truth of God’s Word and not fables. Bless you man of God.

WHO WAS WITH GOD WHEN HE CREATED MAN?

Thank you for reading your bible and sharing what you believe. One day we will all stand before God himself and give an account of our actions here on earth, including the information we may have shared with others. Please take a look at the term "sons of God" again. It appears twice in Genesis and three times in the book of Job. They all speak of angels or heavenly beings that have direct access to God. Mankind does not have this access in the old testiment (read Luke 16). In the new testiment mankind is given the power to be called "sosn of God" through Jesus.

They were royal descendants, human men and its generations of men "taking" women. Which ones? Their patriarchs are mentioned in the genealogy before, i believe

You have to look at the original Hebrew text in the OT not English! Bene Elohim is the term used, which is also used in Job speaking of angelic beings! The Book of Enoch has the same exact story as Genesis 6 but expands on the story in greater detail. Enoch was considered scripture up until 300-400 AD so there is no debate that the ancient reader considered Genesis 6 supernatural and not about men. Most biblical scholars believe in the supernatural explanation in this story, because remember they actually research the original Hebrew/Greek/Aramaic