ha! Thanks mate! I even ran in it 😬 just missing a One-Wheel 🤷🏻‍♂️

@@markbone What if i shoot at 60fps and export and 60fps or 30fps? Will this cause a problem?

Everyone now uses slow mo for everything. It looks great for a few seconds and then gets boring.

EVERYTHING.

Ok, if Matt WhoisMatt is following Mark Bone, then I best get on it pronto..

Hahaha 🤪🤣

How much data rate?

I had the same thing when I bought a phone that filmed HD240fps.

Thanks Lawrence!

one year later, apple fixed it!

🙏🏻🙏🏻 thanks mate!!

💯💯 Slow Motion is amazing but not all the time 😬

"for him" I really don't understand what the fuck he was talking about considering the question is "to shoot at 24fps or 120 fps". The question was never when to have motion blur or when to have details, because 240fps would easily win that by simply playing it back at 24fps.... The real disadvantage of 480 fps and 960 fps is that 1920fps takes up less space then 3840fps. everything else is up to the director, if you only caught 24fps the that's all that you got to work with. he did have a run in the sun so he was shirt less for that video, also you got to give that man credit for the sunglasses they really did look cinematic, not like some fuck boy that got a degree in arts. Seriously I don't even film shit and I know that the faster the fps the more light it requires, a 24fps shot would require more light thus the exposure would be more, that's what gives a back alley fight more "feel", it's dimly lit, fast ad "gritty" compared to a 60fps action shot in a brightly lit environment where every detail matter. I mea I didn't have daddy money or felt the need to expose myself to a camera on the internet. maybe I'm wrong

@@svampebob007 you are correct…many still have not figured it out yet. He gave great advice

You make an excellent point. His unstated assumptions are atrocious. This is YT, not second year cinema. We're all left to guess something like this... "All shots are played at a frame rate of 60fps, so divide 60 by the recording frame rate to get the playback speed." That would make a RECORDING frame rate of 120 play at 0.5x real time and a RECORDING frame rate of 30 play at 2x real time. The crucial five second explanation is sorely missed.

Thank you. I am a novice and thought something was missing, but was not sure what.

"Shoot at 60fps and playback at 60fps" is not slow motion, just higher detail.

I LOVE TO RUN

🙏🏻 thanks mate

Potato Jet?

Epic Light Media and Still Moving?

@@cambriantommy5273 Sorry, but he's not a professional tbh. ;)

My trusty GH5 😍

@@chris.chiutena Love it!

Liking my xt4 - it seems to have a solid 120fps

My favorite slow motion camera is the one I have, 🤣 so far using 60 fps on my EOS R has been great, only a couple of times have I used the 120 fps for fixed shots of food falling or stuff that I can fix focus

@@imAnsar great camera!

Thanks Woody!

Try to vary the shutter speed, 1/320s might do the job

@@ferrysudantara9735 Thank you! I'll try that!

Our A/C power in the US runs at 60 Hz(50hz in EU) so if you shoot in framerates higher than 60fps you can get a flicker from lights using that power. Quality video lights convert this power to D/C and eliminate this issue. There are also ways to fix this in post. Even LEDS can flicker if they use a dimming process called pulse width modulation(google pwm to learn more).

Theres also the option to use davincis deflicker setting, really does work wonders if you have a robust enough file. Ive been able to achieve 240fps under led household bulbs (i was on a canon c700 mind you, so please post your results with your camera, id be really interested to see)

@@loganfishbeard And LEDs don't even need to be dimmed to be suffering from PWM or AC-ripple. LED power supplies can suffer from AC-ripple when their filtering is not (what I call) up to standards (as I think LED-lighting should not have any flicker at all, whether it be a videolight or normal household/office lighting) but there are also quite a lot of power supplies for LEDs that suffer flicker from PWM driven circuitry. Those last are usually the hardest to deal with as the frequency can differ from light to light or can even vary with the temperature of the LED itself (higher temperature can have the driver lower the dutycycle but some counteract possible flicker by also raising the frequency) AC-ripple is simple: match your framerate to the power-supply frequency and make sure you choose a shutterspeed that is always a double, qaudruple and so on of your framerate, although it doesn't guarantee you won't have trouble with banding. One advice though: a real videocamera usually suffers far less from banding/flickering than a smartphone or digital photocamera, which is just down to how the sensor is read. Downside is that where a smartphone or photocamera starts to get issues with banding, a videocamera usually has the whole frame affected ;)

Thanks Connor! Just trying to help you guys when you're shooting!

I got some footage on my Mavic 2, at 24fps and dropped it into a 30fps timeline, and FCPX added a duplicate frame every four frames to make up the disparity in frame rates. I don't know, but my guess is that frame rates that don't multiply or divide equally to the timeline will suffer. So, maybe a 30fps timeline for those 'slo-mo's' you mentioned? 24fps 'not playing well with others' is why I almost never shoot 24fps. I could be wrong... (BTW, I'm shooting on an EOSR and 70D at the moment, plus Hero7 and Hero8, Osmo Pocket, Osmo Action as well, and combine a lot of various footage, all shot at multiples of 30.)

Lost in math kiura🤪! Scary

Look at the frame rates that each of those devices support for example if they all are capable of supporting 30p it probably makes sense to set all of the devices to 30p. If they do not all support a common frame rate then find a good compromise. Something shot in 30p on a 24p timeline most of the time no one would notice because they'll be too focused on the action. Another factor is what codecs are used to encode the video on each device chances are that each device encodes the video with a slightly different method - I have a generic GoPro which does use a good codec so my editor must re-encode those parts because even though the frame rate is the same. Still, you would not notice this in the end result the only thing is it takes longer to encode the file to generate the final product. The most important takeaway is it's good to develop a knowledge of the problems that can appear when combining different frame rates.

Exactly. This should have been pointed out at the beginning of the vid. I also shoot at 30fps on a 30fps timeline. Then 60fps 120fps drop in perfectly.

Paul C believe me, you notice a distinct jitter from one frame being dropped every five frames!

Well basically all those times stability is not an issue: so when you're shooting from a tripod or use a gimbal: turn stabilisation OFF. It will try to prevent a pan as it thinks it's movement, and especially in a gimbal, that compensates for movement itself, it could really counteract the image. Even when you're shooting handheld, stabilisation can be a thing you might want to turn off. The GH5 does a fantastic job at stabilisation, but when you are getting better at panning or tilting by hand, this can introduce the same unwanted effects as when on a tripod. (what you'll see is that when you start and stop panning, the sensor basically lags for a while and when coming to a stop after your pan, it could overcompensate and cause a kind of soft bounce-back like effect.

💯💯💯

its definitely worth it!

The gh5 is still a beeeeaaaast love it

Hahaha solid

Thanks Sam :) happy to post more videos when I can!

If you shoot everthing at 120, export it at 24, you would lose motion blur when you want motion blur

Yes you can

music to my ears!

agreed

Thanks man! It makes for shooting b-roll real easy... because I don't shoot any, just show my videos 😂

😂

apparently people prefer the motion blur? What you're saying makes a lot more sense

60 fps looks 💩 and not natural at all

@@justafrenchkidtryingtospea9462 I sort of agree. It doesn't look cinematic at all but it is great for sports broadcasts.

@@justafrenchkidtryingtospea9462 - That's just because you're not used to it. Obviously our eyes work at least at 60fps (otherwise we wouldn't notice the difference,) so if frame rates above 24fps "don't look natural," that's just in one's head. (That, or you're watching something where AI took 24fps video and tried to make it look like natural 60fps, which usually DOES look like crap.)

Thanks mate!! Glad you're here for the ride!

💯💯💯

Hhahahahaha Nazaré Tedesco rules the world

@@LeandroLAndrade No.

@@SilentAndy yes

Thank you!!

Bahaha!

@Andres Bonilla hahaha yaaaa that is really true! I didn't even think of those but your defo right! (Not being sarcastic) that really is true also! I'm trying to think of what else now 😁! Slow motion of people eating, slow motion of girlfriend eating, slow Mo of girlfriend brushing her hair lol, slow motion passing trucks, signs, tunnels, lamposts, cows, sheep, birds, in slow motion 🤣. Next people will be trying to do slow Mo of slow Mo lol.

Thanks Steve! Love talking about the nitty gritty

bahaha!

i edit all my youtube videos on a 2017 macbook. i shoot at 1080 120 every day. i make a video just about every day. macbook is great

hahaha, right?

Agreed!

Yep. Yep. Yep. Yep.

🙏🏻 thank you for the support!!

🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

ROFL!!!!! Dei uma olhada nos comentários só pra ver se algum brasileiro também viu aquilo.

Rob Sound 😂😂😂 teve mais um cara que tbm identificou o meme

It's the best

That meme’s been worldwide for at least 4 years, not that weird at all. In fact i’m just finding out it’s from Brazil lol.

🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻 thank you brother

Whaaat. He just wanted to show the difference you

Thanks brother!!

🙏🏻

Thanks Graeme!! Welcome aboard man

Wow thank you! 🙏🏻 KZfaq taught me that I like to teach! The course will be online

💯💯💯

🙏🏻