You failed to mention that Azerbaijani people and armed forces did the same thing to Armenian artefacts and historical monuments and settlers in Nachchivan

You know Australia and New Zealand thought in the first Armenia and Azerbaijan war in 1918-1920, Back then Australia and New Zealand was on Armenia side fighting Azerbaijan and Russian SFSR.

I couldn’t find any false or extremely biased statements from the video. It was very good as usual and you were able to maintain your standard..

Did you see this video of Armenian militia men being executed?

Lmao I am proud of NordVPN for this daring sponsorship

well this is kinda one sided towards azerbaijan lol (since he's azeri himself) but I personally sided with azerbaijan anyways so we're fine with it lol

@@ibnu9969 I have to disagree. Just because he's Azerbaijani doesn't mean he can't be objective around the topics surrounding Azerbaijan. You can actually see that he's beeing objective in this video as well.

@@ibnu9969 it can be biased but , he is not lying , just hiding some facts And it's not US , he can get in trouble for speaking something

Armenia compelled by the powers that be to fight this fight. It's not even in Armenia's interest.

@@yoghurtlover3660 I do see him being objective by stating the fact of what happened on the field. I just find some words he used in his narration is biased towards azerbaijan but since it's in his and his country's interest I find it understandable

They had their fair share of drama with Russia already

@Or ka damn, so that's a habit

And what should exactly Georgia do in the current situation (honestly asking)? We have an upcoming election and any involvement in the conflict will be seen (from the point of community) as current parliaments tries to uphold power, not that we are giving the real interest the situation. Also the prime minister, as well as president, offered for a peace dialogue to be upheld in Tbilisi, but surely it did not resonate in either party of a conflict. Subjectively speaking we all know who is the real "friend" of Georgia in the region and who should be punished, but no party will justify current involvement.

don't jinx us dude

@Amperoar Ds yeah even the tactic is the same. Annex the lands through creating puppet states.

that's mainly because Turkey is desperate to provide them with as many modern weapons as possible

@@nightmarekhazix4419 Don't forget israel

@@nightmarekhazix4419 azerbaijan has money to buy modern weapons unlike armenia

Bro they be: ik we having a hard time fighting the Azerbaijani, but hey what's wrong with say claiming a part of Turkey in the EXACT other side of our nation.

@@zinedinezethro9157 I honestly don't know what they were expecting lol they only got that dumbass Pashinyan to blame for that

Where are you from?

@@nurlanezizzade4885 🇼🇫

Some are made with the intention of avoiding war, like the one in the east of Afganistan, but it always ends in war anyway

Regardless

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/kMCYmbygldKaYoU.html KARABXH IS AZERBAYJAN!!!!

*+dragonrykr* I love/hate to be that guy, so actually: blogs.sas.com/content/sastraining/files/2015/11/word_frequency.png

Geopolitics

take a shot whenever Shivan says 'periphery'

I learn a lot today like Armenia Bad Azerbaijan good

He's unbiased

@Alex Freeman not really

@@TheGamerGuyXBOX Unbiased my Ass Hahahaha

lol does this mean he's biased? just asking

Yes

Yes please

Please I’ve been dying for content on this

Literally been refreshing his page every few days for this.

hope u like it

where does caspian report live? inside one of these countries?

@Proto Edwardian Although I agree with you that he is biased, It seems Armenia did lose, looking at the ceasefire. CR talked about how Armenia tried to move Armenians into Nagorno-Karabakh but neglected to mention that Azerbaijan did the exact same thing before the first war. Not to mention the Armenia-Turkey dispute is exaggerated and lacks the historical context. Most likely to make Armenia sound like the bad guy.

@Proto Edwardian him being slightly biased because he is Azerbaijani doesn’t change the fact he was right on the Armenians losing the conflict.

Ironic how he didn't mention ANYTHING about the 400,000 Armenian refugees that had to flee Azerbaijan. Ironic how he didn't mention that the Azerbaijani school school curriculum teaches kids to hate Armenians

@@peternguyen7207 he’s very unbiased

@@tamacat920 He's definitely biased but it's a decent video. Here's another informative one worth watching with the section starting around 20:43 providing crucial in-depth historical context, including an arbitrary parceling (of interior USSR boundaries) in the 1920s by Stalin: (1.25x speed recommended) *The fog of war between Armenia and Azerbaijan* kzfaq.info/get/bejne/d8WefJViuba-g6s.html

@@tamacat920 he's Azeri... so, hands tied?

@@peternguyen7207 Video is about NK, still didn't get it ?

I do concur that it's prudent to declare his own connection in this case, it does seem that it has impacted his report in certain areas and that questions the accuracy or at least its neutral perspective.

he did it in the linked older video. I myself expected him to mention it in this video too.

@@thorstenfinke2751 The one covering the war didn't state it either. So he's only 1 for 3 for stating his bias.

If he actually resident of Azerbaijan - he could be legally prosecuted and mob lynched BOTH for treason / being a tribal traitor in case he pulls out the true, unbiased version of events. Official history and political claims of Azerbaijan an Turkey both are total bullshit and you can be prosecuted for merely shedding some light on it. For such reasons, he should have avoided any Armenian case in his videos - it only discredits him.

@@Yaratoma stop using fancy words! I can't understand shitt.

2020: You dont say?

caspian report pushes govt narrative again

@@antilockdown4350 lol... He was 100% right on projections tho and that's how you tell apart wishful thinking and clear analysis

@@minzblatt fail shill

@@antilockdown4350 “shill” Armenia was eviscerated by Azerbaijan militarily and the bulk of the illegally occupied territories were transferred back to Azerbaijan, with the Azeris gaining a guranteed corridor to Nakchivan and turning the Armenian separatist republic into a rump beholden to Russia’s benevolence. The only shilling appears to be you in complaining that Armenia lost rather handily. The interesting part is Armenia’s government and Russia both affirm Azerbaijan’s decisive victory.

Politics! Nobody asked for it but here we are

The reason for Israel's cozy relationship with Azerbaijan is - for me - a complete mystery. It seems to me that they would be sympathetic to a Christian country with a long history of being murdered and bullied by Muslims. On the other hand, the Iranian disposition is a lot easier to understand. Azerbaijan has a nationalist and irredentist streak and many Azeri want to unite all Azeri in a single nation. That means Iran. Secondly, Azerbaijan is relatively prosperous and Western, whereas Iran is an authoritarian hell hole of misery. Thus, many Azeris in Iran look at the prospect of uniting with Azerbaijan favorably. So Iran supports Armenia as a counterweight to Azerbaijani ambitions and progress.

There are no true relationships between countries, only shared interests.

@@juliancate7089 Azerbaijan provides Israel with fuels. A significant portion of Israel's resources are Azeri. it also has a Jewish population both in Israel and in Azerbaijan. Armenia might have been fighting Muslims but it's historically Anti Semitic and Pro-Palestinian.

ISREALI POSTER. I can't respond to you through the link because my reply appears from right to left. Anyway, thanks for letting me know about this. Do you have links which I can read for more information.

hey I like your videos, cool stuff!

I’m an Azeri from Iran and Shirvan failed to mention that Iranians fought and died for Azerbayzhan during the first Karabak war . Most Azeri’s in Iran are considering themselves Iranian’s and have positive attitude towards the Azeri people outside of Iran and that’s normal but it doesn’t mean they want to secede from Iran or the government is afraid of secessionist movements , only concern of Iran is the security along its borders and supported the Azerbayzhan’s claims to its land .

@@siyavashbeyk155 wow I didn't know that Iran is such a democracy heaven that people can express their political views so freely. Is there any neutrally conducted poll or referendum on this?

@@siyavashbeyk155 It's a short video on Geopolitics. That's how it is. Thank you for clarifying.

@@siyavashbeyk155 Most Azerbaijanis would happily break away from Iran for either Turkey or Azerbaijan. Turks are increasingly distancing themselves from Iran. These are opinions of mixed or Persianized Turks from Tehran or some other towns which still view themselves Iranian. If the situation in Karabakh is prolonged or if the central government in Tehran fails then Azerbaijan will break away from Iran. The VAST majority of Iranian Azerbaijanis I know don't consider themselves Iranian one bit..

@Tattle Boad that means you died trying.

@Tattle Boad then you failed to stop them from breaking your arms and legs, locking you in a box, and throwing you in an ocean, thus forcing you to stop trying

Some things aren't worth trying, such that succeeding in attaining those goals actually constitutes failure.

@Tattle Boad That misses the irony.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/kMCYmbygldKaYoU.html

you only include Russia? Turkey is also a player in the region. Turkey and Azerbaijan are both Turkic and Islamic countries. they also speak almost the same language. Azeri language is basically Turkish with an accent. and of course Armenians were victims of a genocide under the Ottoman Empire, something that Turkey doesn't recognize. Turkey also discriminates against its Kurdish minority population and of course there was a failed coup d'etat attempt in 2016. many journalists, political opponents, generals, teachers and students were arrested. Turkey is no longer a democratic and secualar country. Sultan Erdogan is an Islamist Fascist with a fetish for the Ottoman Empire. Turkey even want to start a war with Greece, wants to remove Assad from power in Syria so Erdogan can install a puppet in his place.

Best case scenario for the Caucasus is for Turkey to loose a lot of territory to establish eastern Kurdistan, which would then be a peaceful nation boundary between Turkey and where Armenia reaches the black sea. With those gains Armenia returns lands to Azerbaijan and withdraws troops with Kurdistan and Georgia providing peacekeeping forces paid for by Russia, Turkey and UN. Georgia and Kurdistan providing stability instead of an old empire will ensure both of their likelihood to cooperate. For reparations to Azerbaijan they are allowed free access to the black sea for X number of years through Armenian territory. To ensure Russia doesn't continue meddling they have to withdraw from the area allowing Chechnya the autonomy they've been wanting. If it works as well as it does in my head then those 4.5 States could develop strong ties and economic stability and growth that would act as a secure buffer and safe haven.

I think you could refine your humour, it comes off more insulting than funny given the gravity of the situation. Or maybe I am just too involved to find a laugh in this.

2021 iran with armenia

@@nothingvideos689 against Azerbaijan? possibly

Exactly, there is even a document of the first republic of Azerbaijan agreeing to cede Karabagh to Armenia, Stalin rejected.

He's a georgian himself, he knew what he was doing.

Stalin made "The mine territories" which came to action after collapse of soviet union

Salam my Eritrean brother.. Tigryna Nazarab? Ana nishta Tigryna nazarab.

More like 'looking in horror at what's happening'. There is an apocryphal story about party delegates from Armenia and Azerbaijan coming to Moscow to discuss the Karabakh problem in the 30s, and Stalin inviting them to sample Armenian cognac and Azerbaijani tea, and warning them that if they couldn't get along and settle the dispute over 'Beautiful, Blooming Karabakh', they would be sent to 'Beautiful, Blooming Magadan'.

Do i want to know what an analist is??

Yeah, I forgot Shirvan is from the region. I know very little about the issues, but the video seems quite very fact based to me. I don't know if there is anything he omitted. I was rooting a bit for the Armenians, as they have been hurt many times in history, and I really do not want Erdogan to get stronger. But it seems that the Armenians have overplayed their hand, and should have settled for a peace deal while they were ahead.

I think he was actually extremely biased in the way he presented the information. It's interesting that he forgot to mention the 300,000 - 500,000 Armenian refugees from the original conflict while he inflated the numbers of Azeri refugees (maybe he had to do this because of the political situation in Azerbaijan but Idk), when he said that the southern regions of Artsakh had 5 times the population of the northern regions that is just a lie (the south had a little over double the population so why the need to stretch numbers? Unless your trying to justify something really bad that you're planning on doing to the Armenians), also that he only mentions things like ethnic cleansing when talking about or showing screenshots of Armenian war crimes but he never mentions the Azeri ones, add in that little passive aggressive threat at the end that basically says 'if you refuse to be minorities under Azerbaijan then the time for peaceful solution might pass very soon' without him stating what a non-peaceful solution would obviously be.

@@rogerwilco2 He Didn't say anything wrong, but there were some half truth and omissions. He definitely framed things as Azerbaijan being the victim. Like siting Putin thinks the region belongs to Azerbaijan followed by highlighted Russian new found disdain for the Armenian government and improving relations with Azerbaijan. Given how Russia has acted in Crimea I don't think they care what borders are. In this and his other video cover the subject he omits any crimes by Azerbaijan and highlights ones by Armenia. He high lights Armenian tactics incorporate the regions into Armenia but not Azerbaijans effort to remove Aremnian culture form it's regions or public statements about violence towards Aremenians. Turkey is playing a bigger par than he mentions. Turkey committed a genocide against Armenians in 1915 where 1.5 million died or disappeared so they have a clearly have a bit more against armenians that simple dispute.

@@rogerwilco2 It's not Turkey who is in this fight. I dont get why media is trying to blame everything on Erdogan for all causes in its region. Same goes for Syrian Civil War, which is a threat for Turkey's southern regions, and same goes for East Med, where there is an ambitious plan to isolate Turkey out of its natural resources. Both issues which are critical for our nation's survival & future generations' prospects. For us Turks Qarabag is the matter of our brother nation Azerbaijan. Before Armenia's new president surprisingly did advocate the old nationalistic rhetoric of expansionism (celebrating anniversary of Sevres declaration & eyeing Turkish lands to establish "Great Armenia") & enforcing the usurpation of Qarabag's adjecent 7 regions with yet another highway in the making, there was actually hope in Ankara & Baku that Pashinyan could be changing the game which would mean more cooperation, but as it was seen in his works & statements, he was eager to worsen the situation. Aliyev called out on his bluff & Erdogan saw this opportunity to give Pashinyan a fair share of reality check. In the end we hope Azerbaijan gains his lands back & certain degree of autonomy can be granted to the Armenians who still want to live in Azerbaijan. And peace.

Look at how Azerbaijan and Armenia were carved up by the USSR, they were literally designed to be in conflict. Too busy fighting each other to unite and work together. Divide and conquer.

@@dongster529 yeah of course but also religions involved outside influences like turkey Russia

@tryndaOP OK 🤔 except one being "Armenian orthodox the other being like 95% Muslim and using jihadiat from Syria to swell thier ranks

@@jonathanwilson4016 here in where i live its the first time i saw an anarchist defending a christian country xd

Well, Iran is a much more powerful enemy to provoke.

Because it's internationally recognised parts of my country but the south not

Also 1 million azerbaijanis used to live in İrevan(today Armenia) and Karabakh before the war which later they got expelled in the 90th.It's now normal for armenians to be the majority

Back in the day the majority population was azeri people but they got deplaced or killed

Well, not exactly the majority in Nagorno-Karabakh region in particular, but still with great historical and cultural ties to the region - and an absolute majority in the neighbouring formerly occupied regions. That's a key factor not to be omitted. Even though the region's borders were drawn in a way to include all Armenian-populated settlements, there were still big Azerbaijani settlements and cultural cradles inside it like the cities of Shusha and Khojaly. During the war a total of more than one million ethnic azerbaijanies were either brutally killed, kidnapped, tortured or forced into refuge both from Nagorno-Karabakh and the surrounding districts by militarized armenian nationalists. The ties of the refugees to the region were attempted to be erased furtherly, by vandalising and destruction of azerbaijani religious and cultural heritage in the region, resettlement of ethnic armenians to the region and rasing of the remaining azerbaijani settlements to the ground. Thus, we got what we got - an enclave controlled by ethnic armenians within Azerbaijan based on the rights of ethnic cleansing and conquest.

But it's certainly true. Shit's not hit the fan yet. People are dying, sure. But we're speaking of thousands, not tens of thousands or even more, which it easily could transform into if major players get involved.

Tgat

@@AboutThingsPodcast the conversation was certainly interesting. Thank you for the effort

Actually, the war is ended now. In a good point, Azerbaijan liberated significant amount of their lands in those territories till 10 October, it is considerable as a victory of Azerbaijan. Meanwhile, Armenia lost their regulation over these lands beside thousands of soldiers and a lot of militiary equipments. On 10 October , Putin, president of Russia talked to both presidents of the countries and made a peace agreement with such conditions that Armenia forces should leave unliberated lands till certain dates and armenians who were living outside of Nagorno Karabakh should leave these lands. However, armenians still will continue to their lives in Nagorno Karabakh same as before. There are some uncertain questions, but I think it will be solved in following negotiations.

This guy is paid by azerbaijani government you see clearly propaganda in this video. Dislike

@@Copisy are you fucking crazy?

@@Nariman5656 yeah, proof laying on twitter

@@Copisy are like really fucked up totally? I know everything about Caucasia I am from Kazakhstan and I can tell you that everything that he says in this video is totally true

@@azerbaijan8144 Separatism is unacceptable. Karabakh is UN recognized part of Azerbaijan

@Artr Thormodr It became that way after 80% of Abkhazians were deported from their homeland by Russians. The whole Caucasus colonized by Russia with the help of Georgians who granted navel Base for Russians which became instrumental for the region being invaded. Most of the Georgians in Abkhazia were brought in during (Beloved Georgian butcher) the Stalin period. I would say 80% of the Migrelians were settled during this period for the purpose of taking over Abkhazia. It was Stalin who reduced Abkhazia's status from the independent Socialist Republic to the Autonomous Republic of Georgia. There is also an issue between Georgia and Armenians about the status of Javakheti was ethnic Armenian majority. If Armenia was not landlocked and can not afford to lose Georgian connection. This would be another trouble spot.

We don't expect anything, we act upon our duties.

@@azerbaijan8144 do not say allah if u follow aliyev the zionist

Arpi Khachatryan. Watch my videos. I support Armenia

I was thinking the same thing, I was about to call pest control.

Nit picking is fun ain't it?

i thought so too. but on the plus side i now have a very clean screen.

@@BoqPrecision advice isnt nitpicking, its a valid request to make

Yes, I find it really annoying as well. It is in a lot of their videos. It looks especially bad when it's images of people. It looks like there are insects crawling over them. I really do not like this "crawling insects" effect.

Yep, you can tell it's taking every ounce of objectivity to keep the narrative neutral

We should know that here it really won't be. An interesting somewhat tempered perspective tho for sure.

He had to wait 5-7 business days from Azeri intelligence office

@@kalomboC Pitty is not neutral whatsoever. He showcased near all examples of Armenia controversial deeds while utterly ignoring Azeris ones.

@@ReichLife nothing controversial, it's a defensive war for Azerbaijan

AKA Genocide

Friend this is the only option to make peace.

Cause his Azeri lmao

14:30

He really glossed over the events of the late 80s and the USSR period in general because they paint Azerbaijan in a far worse light. I suppose it's very hard to stay unbiased when your own people are involved.

@@migkillerphantom the man lives in a dictatorship it very hard to keep a grip on any semblance of neutrality when this greavence has been beaten into you all your life. I can't trust his take on this

@@ashvardanian >expel 700000 Azerbaijanis from their homelands >cry about it when Azerbaijan comes to take back their land

@@user-bs6bm9dl3r as if azerbaijan wouldn't do the same if they had won

still, his point of view was neutral, he didn't accuse them on anything. Just shared his opinions from geopolitical view. let me show you funny fact www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-54645254 this article is anti-Azerbaijani and guess who is the author? Grigor Atanesian, who is armenian and works for bbc.

Why didnt you say that you are an armenian before you made the comment?

@Playlife626 lol, it's not Iran))

Armenia is the aggressor, they displaced and massacred nearly a million azerbaijanis to occupy this terrority

@@Fff-ek3qy by that logic, doesn't Armenia have the right to all of northeastern turkey because of the armenian genocide?

@@danielwoods3896 no😭its different things, armenia is ILLGEGALY occupying the terrority, there are multiple UN resolutions that prove that karabakh is azerbaijan

Welcome to Israel :)

@@Fff-ek3qy 4 quadrillion

Sadly logic and reasoning don't rule but feelings and ideology do.

Why does Azerbaijan allow their territories occupied by Armenia

Given that Artsakh/NK belonged to the Armenian people since prehistory, makes sense for Armenia to control it. Remember there is a nice chunk of Azerbaijan that is an exclave in the middle of Armenia and they’re not claiming it. Being surrounded by a country doesn’t count as a valid land claim.

Maybe there was a glimpse of hope when Pashinyan was elected. But after all that happened, I don't think these 2 communities will forgive each other for another few decades.

thing new confilect of interest... it is easy to go to war than divied and share...

It would be nice if the Armenians could return to the Shahumyan and other areas north of the Murovdag (Mrav) mountain range, and Azerbaijanis could return to the eastern shore of Lake Sevan

@@MurCellic1903 Velvet revolution gave Azeris hope. But Pashinyan did everything worse, threw away the Madrid principles, acted provocatively. So in that regard despite being war criminals Kocharyan and Sargsyan acted in a more delicate way.

campkira What makes you think Azerbaijan has control of the eastern shore of Sevan?

Belongs to*

Ugh, can't believe you support the skyrim state

@@secretname4190 yes, brother

@@KameroonEmperor Damn faithless Imperials.

No lolly gagging

@Erx touche

@Desert Queen Not really. Armenia, like trump supporters, refused to accept reality.

@Desert Queen you don’t know what you’re talking about. It was the Armenians who expelled Azeri people from their homes and burned it as they left few weeks ago. This isn’t Islam vs some other religion. This is nationalism.

@Desert Queen your mindset and knowledge about geopolitics is very much outdated. Todays' relationships are not formed on the basis of religious motives. First of all you should be aware of the fact that one of the greatest supporter and historical friend of Azerbaijan is Israel, a jewish state which is in a state of fierce controversy with most of the islamic states. Secondly, I don't know how you conceive of Azerbaijan in your mind but it is not what you think. Unlike Armenia It's not a religious country at all, it is the most secular one, multireligious and multinational country in the Caucasus. It has been a hub for a centuries for all kinds of people of various nationality and religion. Hence you can come across a catholic church as well as jewish synagogue while walking around in the capital Baku downtown however you would not able to find a single mosque throughout Armenia.

@@cavidhummatov4431 I guess he doesn't even know that Iran, Palestine, Libya, Syria (four islamic states) have supported "christian catholic" Armenia in this war 😁

Muslims just take (annex) territories they've never Give up territories Examples - Cyprus , Republic of Srpska north Euphirius

@@firephoenixgamers8590 shirvan is azerbaijani

Actually he is azerbaijan

Looking at the big picture from the last 100 years, as an outsider, I cant help it think that most of Armenia's neighbours would love to see them deleted off the map. Most significantly, whether you wanna call it genocide or not in terms of what the Ottomans did to them during WW1, it practically wiped out a large chunk of their ethnic presence in the region.

Theres armenian church in the middle of Baku. you look it up on google. while you do it look at juma mosque too and other mosques that has become resting place for pigs and cows.

there was destroyed equipment of the 60s-70s and 80s. the same Armenian air defense systems have been in service for more than 50 years And their missiles have a range of 20 km and UAVs have a range of 40 km. If the Armenians were Russian EW systems are not a drone would not have passed They were either destroyed or could take it and put there where they need And this was already in the Crimea in 2014, When the Russian system of electronic Warfare put a large American drone and completely studied

Tbh modern drone warfare can be destroyed by fighter jets and. Missile system or other drone it's not possible in as drone have less paylaod

@@axel665 You miss the obvious point here. You can produce drones 20x or 30x for the price of a fighter jet & no, you can equip them with fighting qualities such as new gen of Turkish drones (Akinci & Aksungur) with air-to-air missiles. In the end, it will be a numbers game and guess what, the unmanned swarms will be victorious in the end, cause the seasoned pilots will die, whilst the operators will sip on their mango tea in the central getting another mission with another batch of war equipment. I think everybody can understand it's not a matter of how, but a matter of when.

@@minzblatt exactly. Striking drones and squad level reconnaissance drones will be a massive part of warfare in the future, old soviet equipment has been obsolete since the gulf war tbh

For what its worth in his original video (2-3 years ago) he did disclose it

Armenia has had a Kurdish minority for ages near Yerevan.

@Tall Skipper lmao you don't know what you are talking about, Kurds have been living in Armenian lands for along time.

14:30

@Tall Skipper i am not from armenia

Salam.

freedom Chechnya

Cool

Shirvan the madlad

Both are the same person. There is no line between bold and mad

How about Shirvan the bold madman

@@meltup3668 Shirvan the Madbold

Shiirvan the mudslime

It’s not even subtle, he says Azerbaijani losses may be just as much which doesn’t make sense cause the attacking side always has 2 to 3 time more casualties

@@samk7717 Really though? You just assume that the attacker literally always suffers more casualties? I guess you haven't paid attention to any war fought in the last century or more...

@@samk7717 Compare Nazi to Soviet losses

because Azerbaijan right based on international law and historical facts. It's impossible to be impartial.

@@samk7717 except this isn’t just infantry rushing to well dug army , but Azerbaijan has completely dominated the air and done most damage from there

What da heck are you talking about? What trouble? I am in Azerbaijan. Most Azerbaijanis know what Shirvan put out, and agree and support that position. No one is getting into "serious trouble". You must be a diaspora Armenian who has been brainwashed to think that.

"exodus" you're calling it? ok.

@@plotonapolonich5513 hahah - please read my comment big man. 1000+ journalists in jail? No foreign journalists allowed in without supervision? 2.71 Democratic index score? Look all of this up my friend before getting all aggressive against Armenians. I'm of Armenian origin living in Belgium and have absolutely nothing against Azerbaijan or your people, only Aliyev and your current authoritariant dictatorship.

@@MrPotanton i am also not very Azerbainani. I habe lived in US drom 17 till 34. And back home for the war. I will take a reasonably corrupt Aliyev any day than a democrat by the likes of Trump or Biden for that matter who by the push of an executive order influenced by the special interest groups causes an invasion and death of 100'000 citizens of a foreign country. I can give rats ass about a journalist eating up a few punches in a prison, and getting lets go after 30 days, than live all my life with the pain of 613 civilians having gotten nassacred and mutilated in #Khojali. Corruption and oppression in Azerbaijan is at extremely high level. It does not affect ordinary citizens. I stand 3 minutes in line ti get my passport & driver license renewed, whuch takes 8 hiurs in US. All duties, all budgetary items are transparent and legitimate. So what ruling family skims off the top? Where dont they do the same? Yiu think "candle of democracy" US went into Irak for anything other than run a budgetary deficit to skims off to the military-industrial complex or supply Dick Chaneys KBR with 20 billion dollar service contract? If you are then you are naive mynfriend. We live in a dangerous neighborhood, and never in our history EVER been so independent to garner our own national insterests. Aliyev problem is our problem, and it only affect us. Aliyev problem is not external. Opposition's main duke with him was his imability to do anything with Karabakh. People wanted war. People wanted memory and sacrifice of 20'000 heroes that were killed because of mythical "Great Armenia" ambitions of fascist "supreme race" of followers of Nazi collaborator, armenian national hero Garegin Nzdeh. Aliyev is our problem, and we will deal with that problem by appropriate means, at appropriate time. Now, we are united. More united than any nation can be at such moment. We are dealing with an adversary that has a collective psychological issues bordering with Nazi ideologies of supremacy of their own group, and fascism against civilians. When we finish with them, there will be time for internal deliberations. Those in the West pointing to the lack ofndevelopment of civil liberties or democratic institution at this moment pursue either of two agendas: 1) Aliyev is a dictator, and thus this war is imposed by him on his people. Thats bull shit, for the reason I described above. 2) Aliyev is a dictator, and thus how can Armenians in Karabakh agree to be ruled by him. Legitimate arguement, that I think will be a good pressure on the ruling party to be more liberal and open in the future. But in no way is inclusion of Armenian of Karabakh under Azerbaijani rule is a "downgrade" to the condition they live now under the illegal junta regime in terms of living standards or civil liberties. If you think a military regime that has committed #Khojali and has turned one of the most beautiful places on earth, #Karabakh into most militarized plot of land on the planet is more "free" you are even more naive than I hoped so.

@@plotonapolonich5513 I'm not here to argue about US politics, I don't like their system either. But have you ever been to Karabakh/Artsakh? Who are you to say what their living conditions are like? Why do you think they're fighting goddamnit! Your government has a stance of no regret concerning the Armenian genocide - so the people living in Karabakh (91% armenian) are scared! Again, I've been there and my dad who did some work relating to setting up schools there! Stepanakert was a beautiful city before Azerbaijan started this war. Allow me to further point out that Stepanakert is shelled almost every day, where CIVILIANS are killed constantly.

This is the case, when one side is totally right, but the other side can't be more wrong... This is so obvious that one thinks there must be a trick somewhere.

@@yourssincerely3349 perhaps you're right. In that case Armenia has balls

@@ralexmarquez balls as in illegally occupying lands? genociding and displacing 1M people from their homelands, using child soldiers and spreading false claims and propaganda to raise tentions? you are out of your mind and no wonder you find this propaganda with that sick mentality of yours.

@@ralexmarquez, Armenia used Russia's balls😉 But now Russia's balls are having bad days😂

@@ralexmarquez, in Caucasus only Chechens had their own balls😂

TRT will obviously favor Azerbaijan so this does not say much... Al Jazeera is more balanced since even thought Arabs and Turks are both predominantly (but not entirely) Muslims, there has always been some trouble between them and many Armenians live in Lebanon (almost 4 percent of the population) and Syria (about ½ percent of the population) and they are very popular among the population there. But since the issue of Nagorno-Karabakh is not relevant for the Arab World an Arab news agency will never make a Video which is longer than 16 minutes on this conflict...

To copy my comment from a thread somewhere else: an analysis from a Western European, so a relatively neutral outsider: Both the war, with the past the way it has been for a long time; as well as the current move by the Armenian government were unavoidable. Although the surrendering was controversial, it is probably understandable. Here’s why: If Armenia didn’t surrender, the Azeri’s would’ve taken all of Nagorno-Karabach and maybe even invaded Armenia. It’s just that this would have not benefitted Russia, so Russia put a halt to it. Azerbaijan isn’t satisfied yet, even now..... (dictatorship vs. Armenian democracy (although to be fair Armenia’s democracy is also pretty corrupt and unstable)) Why this happened? Simple. Azerbaijan has become MUCH more powerful than Armenia these last decades. How? Money from OIL. The good old “black gold” has caused a war yet again.... it’s the Gulf Wars, Yemen, and even Africa all over again...... Fossil fuel capital on a worldwide scale unfortunately is like a lottery most of the time: some countries get all, some get nothing. The only silver lining is that with rapid transitions to renewable energy, the value of heavily physical location based fossil fuels like oil, will steadily decrease in the future. So countries becoming rich of lucky findings in their soil will eventually become a thing of the past. Not yet though. Climate change will create new conflict areas near and in the polar regions (for example due to the melting of permafrost)

Teach history man before writing a comment

renewable energy is also location-based, not all countries have the ability to use geothermal, wind or hydroelectric power, and solar requires rare (and toxic) heavy metals. it will just result in a shift on which locations are important, although at least i think these locations are more common.

Why not both? Self-determination without violating territorial sovereignty, the former doesn't necessarily imply secession. This messy conflict (inflated by toxic nationalisms from both sides) should and can be solved by guaranteeing the long-aspired self-determination to the NK Armenians within the Azerbaijani borders, the rest are technical issues.

Shirvan clearly stated that an autonomous Regime in Nagorno Karabakh under Azerbaijan is the best solution. The rest of the districts need to be given back to Azerbaijan though as Azeris were majority in those areas. Armenia simply does not want to give the districts back that's why this conflict has been going on this long.

@@lashachakhunashvili1399 Shirvan report does not mention the potential religious consequences. A Christian state and a Muslim state. Can they live together peacefully?

The areas captured are all mostly barren flatland. The heartland of nagorno karabach might be a lot harder to capture.

@@laustudie it will fall eventually in starting of next month

@@laustudie Lachin is key and Qubadli is allready taken. If Azeris capture it before winter the occupation forces in Hankendi will starve.

@ilker kaynakdemir I'm not even from armenia, so not sure which lunatic president you are talking about. Talking from a strategic standpoint here as ex- military. Looking at the terrain maps it is just quite obvious where the hard to take territories are at.

@@laustudie yeah, the terrain there seems not in favor of Azerbaijan, but at least in the early days it seems they have the upper hand in international support, and military technology

Don't pretend you want unbiased reporting when you clearly want to be spoon fed lies and nationalist propaganda. I feel sad for people like you who think litterall propaganda is unbiased news. Also if you really want to know why greece has islands a few km outside turkey read a history book, you might learn something for once..

@@marvinmerten7112 i feel sad for you branwashed ones who keep ignoring documental facts and real history and create myths like stalin gave karabakh to us azerbaijanis.

@@sh6161 I feel sorry for delusional people like you who are trying to rewrite history to fit their nationalistic narrative. The decision to transfer NK to Azerbaijan was made by Joseph Stalin in 1922, it's a fact and there are dozens of documents supporting it.

@@yonduudonta8517 lmfao don't make me show you the letter of Mikoyan to Lenin and also whole map of Azerbaijan that recognized by France and another countries.

@@sh6161 Spare me your Azeri sources, yoldas, I am not another Westerner who doesn't know a thing about the history of the conflict. Caucasian republics didn't have recognized borders up until the Soviet occupation, the only thing that mattered was who de-facto controlled what, but I really doubt that you even knew about it. Honestly, it's pretty funny. You people became so detached from reality that you actually believe in your own bs.

Armenia jitega

6)Armenia gets extremist supporters from Lebanon

7) Armenia attacks the cities which are located far from conflict zone.

8) Armenia did start the war in 1990 so why can't Azerbaijan start it now what a stupid argument. Doing a ethnic cleansing in katabagh to the Azerbaijanis and playing the victim roll. I hope Azerbaijan bombs Yerevan so u understand the fact that the war should stay in the conflict area

8 million well armed Azeris don't need 1000 so called Syrian fighters to beat Armenia ... Logic 101 ... Evidence is king .,.

He lives in Hungary I believe

That's Madrid principles. Except the scheduled referendum. Azerbaijan gets 5 regions to the east of NK, some IDPs return, then Azerbaijan gets the remaining 2 regions that are to the west of NK. And the status of NK is left to decide in the future. Azerbaijan was trying for this resolution since most of our IDPs are from the 7 regions outside the NK. One of our problems would be solved. And yet armenia kept arming and fortifying their armed positions in and especially outside NK, in those 7 regions. OSCE Minsk group was tasked with resolving this conflict, but alas you can see how long it took them to achieve literally nothing.

@@ahadsuleymanli9572 Madrid Principles failed not because of Armenia but because of Azerbaijan. It was Aliev who refused to sign them.

That's an interesting proposal. But I think Armenia would be skeptical about Azerbaijan following their end of the bargain. I mean, Azerbaijan could just delay the implementation of the referendum for whatever reason (especially if polls would suggest an Armenian win) until they felt the demographics had shifted in their favor enough to give them an assured win. The only way a referendum could work would be for the region to be put under UN protection first to assure the results would be legitimate and such a decision would be held despite possible opposition of the losing party. Also, in that hypothetical scenario, would the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh be given Azeri citizenship, or even required to do so, before the referendum takes place?

I would call that "sold"

@@uniuni8855 no Armenia diffidently surrendered.

Winner Azerbaijan

yes, they admit they lost, and signed capitulation

If Armenia didn’t surrender, the Azeri’s would’ve taken all of Nagorno-Karabach and maybe even invaded Armenia. It’s just that this would have not benefitted Russia, so Russia put a halt to it. Azerbaijan isn’t satisfied yet..... (dictatorship vs. Armenian democracy (although to be fair Armenia’s democracy is also pretty corrupt)) Why this happened? Simple. Azerbaijan has become MUCH more powerful than Armenia these last decades. How? Money from OIL. The good old “black gold” has caused a war yet again.... it’s the Gulf Wars, Yemen, and even Africa all over again...... Fossil fuel capital on a worldwide scale unfortunately is like a lottery most of the time. The only silver lining is that with rapid transitions to renewable energy, the value of heavily physical location based fossil fuels like oil, will steadily decrease in the future. So countries becoming rich of lucky findings in their soil will eventually become a thing of the past. Not yet though. Climate change will create new conflict areas near and in the polar regions (for example due to the melting of permafrost)

Four out of his first five videos were about this mess. It has been 10 years. And yet there still much to report. A caspian report

I didn't expect it to be unbaised, but it was extremely disappointing. Obviously this channel can't be relied on for any news or analysis that directly affects Azerbaijan.

The war will probably end before he releases a new video about this topic.

So true. Azerbaijan people are made up of many ethnicity but they all call themselves Azeris except those Armenians. They think that they can carved out their own country inside Azerbaijan.

Why do you value "territorial integrity" over people who live on that territory? I do not have any vested interest in the conflict, but I find it highly bigoted to hold a made-up thing (national borders) over humans those borders are made for.

@@jcoludar If only it was as straightforward as you think. But it's not.

@@jcoludar Azerbaijan is made up of many different ethnicities but they call themselves Azerbaijanis except Armenians in NK because they are the majority. NK is at the border but not exactly at the border with Armenia. Why would Azerbaijan allow Armenians carve out a piece of land in the middle of Azerbaijan? Why can't these Armenians accept Azerbaijani citizenship and live in peace with the rest of the many ethnicities in Azerbaijan? It's like saying that Dagestan can separate from Russia because they are Dagestanis and Muslims. Would you think that Russia allow if Dagestan demand to separate from Russia?

@@petitwhite6366 I am not talking about what Russia or Azerbaijan would allow, more about why do we think that the notion of borders has any merit to it when it clearly creates all sorts of possible conflicts. I am totally up for everybody living in peace, but the idea that "this land is MY land" is clearly flawed and belongs to the past. Russia could not allow Chechnya to separate (though it absolutely should have), but what old dudes in their Ivory Towers decide is not the measurement of what we, humans here in this thread, should consider as valuable. Borders have been invented (~4Kish years ago) and there will be a time when they will be phased out. It is only an idea, and quite an obsolete idea at that, it rests on the desire of those who have the power to control those who do not.

Because Islamic religion came to this region after 7-8th century. And until that time population of this region was christian. Even the state religion of Cacasus Albania was christianity before arab invasion. So there are no only churches in Karabakh, ancient churches are in Gadabay, Dashkasen, Sheki, Zaqatala, Qakh, Qabala and all over Azerbaijan which goes back to begining of century. Even there are some ethnic groups in Azerbaijan even today are christians. Udins are ethnic group who lives in Qabala and they are christian and they are praying in ancient churches in Azerbaijan. So they have nothing to do with armenian churches.

Secondly, who taughed you that Nagorno Karabakh was hand overed to Azerbaijan by the decision of Stalin? Have you ever seen and read that document personally? Or you have heard from someone else? I would highly incourage you to do deep research and to see all with your own eyes rather than hearing from someone else. Original copy of all these documents in russian are available on internet. You can search and see what does it say about Nagorno Karabakh. It says" Nagorno Karabakh "STAY" under control of Azerbaijan. Stay it means it was part of Azerbaijan and by the decision of Stalin it was stayed under control of Azerbaijan anyway. So i couldnt find "given to Azerbaijan" part on the document. If you guys have any prove and documents please share with us too and educate us on this

@@fdd0fdd you are asking very naive, subjective and falsely misleading questions, and for that reason there is no point responding to you. Though I would like to bring your attention to a famous quote, "The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history." George Orwell 1984. Read up about it and you will notice it is exactly what you're doing.

You are the one who is misleading not me. I simply answered your question which is going to create misunderstanding in people's mind. If there is something wrong in my statements please let me know. You asked about churches and why they are there and answered with all facts. Secondly, you started mislead people with your Stalin example which all armenians are using same. And I told truth with facts. I kindly asked you to check original document about this. If i am wrong correct me. About the book, i have read it, not only one time even twice. My favorite book btw :)

@@fdd0fdd 🤦‍♂️read again what wrote. You answered yes, but not with "truth and facts". Your comments are denying and obliterating the understanding of Armenian history.. which brings me back to my point. And just so you know, there isn't "the" document. History is all around you. Visit Artsakh and see the churches for yourself. Armenian inscriptions (unless they're etched or destroyed by turks/Azeris). Because there is video evidence of all this. Once you piece the puzzles together, you will realise that your dictator government has blindsided you. In Azerbaijan there is no freedom of expression unless you confirm to locally published sources which are fabricated propaganda rewriting history. There is clear evidence of all this. Google Azerbaijani laundromat. Also just so you know, Albanian caucasian was an ethnic minority in the region which disestablished during late 8th century. And still after this date many Armenian churches continued to be built with SAME architecture thus proving the point that they are all Armenian churches. Using Caucasian Albania as a "predecessor Christian nation" is clearly "denying and obliterating" the truth by spreading propaganda for territorial and political purposes. If you understand this, you will realise your questions are pointless. Pulling each string in the ball of yarn and claiming that you have read "the" book and that you have stated "truth and facts" proves your lack of understanding of the history of Nakhichevan and Artsakh, and the southern Caucasus at large. I suggest you read non-turkish and azeri sources.

People forget this channel is ran by an Azerbaijani whose earliest videos focused on pro-Azeri propaganda. He's since hidden them as he projects a neutral tone, however wiki-leak emails revealed he was happy to speak with certain intelligence agencies to direct his work.

@Johnny Chap No, been waiting for this video since the conflict started, take a chill pill. I don't enjoy seeing people die either.

@Johnny Chap Lmao boy did you get triggered there!

@Johnny Chap Peacefully? Literally 1st point of the conditions was Armenia hands over surrounding regions to Azerbaijan. Never happened. (Excluding the Lacin corridor)

world war 2 comes to mind, though in recent times? Only some small ones, though modern conflicts nearly never have an exact end to them

If only conflicts were that so easy.

Never. When countries in the middle east start wars, those countries milk em like cows, so it's better to stay out of it and let the 2 countries reach an agreement without countries like us and france and russia and iran screwing it up.

@@matinvatankhah5224 💯💯💯

@@matinvatankhah5224 i for one, would rather not turn a blind eye to genocides like the ones Saddam did. but otherwise yeah, no world police.

That’s not much of an argument. If you are going by who settled there first, then you have to criticize many other countries like Russia, China, and the USA. Those three countries were originally inhabited by native peoples, the native Chechens, Siberians and eastern native people in Russia. Uyghurs in China. Native Americans in the USA. Yet that didn’t stop the Russians, Chinese, and white settlers in America to take over those lands from the natives and claim it as their own, despite natives originally owning it. And that didn’t stop the international communities from recognizing those new countries as belonging to the new settlers like the Russians, Chinese and white Americans who took those lands from the natives.

@@madibacitizen2430 Except Armenians were there first, and are there now.

@@enterchannelnamehere2922 Native Americans still exist. Chechens still exist. Native Siberians still exist. Uyghurs still exist and still live on those lands. And they’re still not getting their land back from the settlers.

And all of Russia was Turkic peoples' homeland before Slavs arrived. Your point?

Don’t forget about the hundreds of thousands of Azerbaijanis expelled from Armenia

@@madjack6667 he didn’t, he mentioned that in the video

Those were reactionary to Armenian separatism. Example 10% of Chechnya is Russian. Chechnya wants independence, keeps terrorising local Russians, continues 100 yrs old (in 1897 50% of Yerevan was Azerbaijani) systematic deportation of Russian. Russians start move to Moscow, and demand gov't to expell Chechens from Moscow in retaliation. Moscow resists for 2 years and eventually gives way after separatism arm themselves and start shooting, no not peaceful anymore.

@@cossackhistorian7425 he mentioned Azerbaijans expelled from Azerbaijan(Karabakh). But didnt say about Azerbaijans expelled from armenia.

@@drakensangminecraft Numbers he provided though are combined from both Armenia and Karabakh. Either mistake or manipulation on his side.

Definitely right XD

Don't know if you're being sarcastic or not.

CaspianReport has been credible and unbiased in all of his videos. You are implying a bias, which is wrong. Must be an armenian.

Obviously !!! Good comment

@@SovetskieSoldat his name is literally aussie boy XDDDDD

To be fair, it’s hard to watch any video on this topic without it being biased. This video was well done. I have been watching this guy for a very long time and every video he has done it was informative

Oh no, it doesn't fit the Armenian interest, so it can't be unbiased. Is definitely more neutral than most Armenian claims.

boris is delusional; the old colonies are looking way beyond that small and shrinking island country

The idea is widely popular in all 4 countries, and I believe it's a party platform for Canada's conservative party.

Well he is not in Baku.

@@togrul4302 you sure? I've heard in one of his videos where he said he lives in baku

@@Alexander99602 my latest info was that he lives in Europe. But still, it does not matter. Anything he said can be checked in online available resources. That is why I don't think that he is biased, because of place where he lives.

@@togrul4302 umm newsflash...baku is in europe

@@markm5758 Baku is not in Europe😂 Anywhere that’s a short ferry ride from Turkmenistan is not considered European in anyone’s language

In this conflict, it is really the case that one party is pretty much very wrong, and the other party is pretty much very right. No matter what, when someone tells the truth about the conflict, people think that it must be biased because it is so obvious who is right and who is wrong from the legal perspective. Attempts to describe this conflict in a "more balanced" way have always led to Armenia gaining from such coverage, i.e. the wrong party being unjustly rewarded for being wrong.

@@tebo4681 Still doesn't nullify my point

@@icostaticrebound6007 No one is telling you to believe or not believe this video by 100%. Yes, the guy is Azerbaijani. If someone is interested to really learn the truth, they are free to take into account this video and do any other further research they like. All I'm saying is that the info given here is quite correct, according to what I had already known before seeing it

​@@tebo4681 I think @To Be is right, it is virtually impossible to make an unbiased report about a conflict your motherland is so intimately involved in. The video would've gained authority if their makers had recognised that fact.

Azerbaijanis have been deported twice from Armenia - in 1948-1953, and in 1987-1990. news.bbc.co.uk/hi/russian/news/newsid_3681000/3681079.stm 263 from 264 mosques in Armenia has been demolished, since Russians started to settle Armenians from Iran and Ottoman Empire into Erivan Guberniya (Modern Armenia). In Azerbaijan there are dozen of synagogues and tens of churches, hundreds of thousand of christians live in Azerbaijan peacefully, more than 30 ethnicities peacefully coexist here, while 98 percent of Armenia is Armenian.

@@yourssincerely3349 Mate. It's hard to've objectivity when you're talking bout your country, it happens.

That's true. In the 1990s, Armenians were deported from Azerbaijan, but Azerbaijanis were also deported from Armenia. The things is, people tend to mix up Karabakh, Nagorno-Karabakh, Armenia, and Azerbaijan - these are all different entities. So, I focused on the Karabakh space, with the premise being the guiding Madrid Principles.

@@CaspianReport keep up the exccellent work

@@AnotherWindaSimp, I just provided you with some facts, now wait for the Armenian side to provide facts and then compare for yourself, I won't try to impose my opinion on you.

I recall saying that on Twitter, but yeah; Azerbaijanis and Armenians will remain neighbours indefinitely. Better to awknowledge each other's boundaries and rediscover how to co-exist. Karabakh doesn't need to be a mono-ethnic space.

I do think he leans to the Azeri side. To me it looks like that Azerbaijan initiated the current episode of the war. Is Azerbaijan in it's right to do this? ... probably, but killing people is always moraly questionable

He's given a pretty objective narrative, though he has not given enough time to what the possible practical reactions from Iran, Turkey and Russia will be if the conflict advances further in Azerbaijan's favour. Can Iran meaningfully influence the conflict with its paramilitary proxies but a strained economy?

@@0799qwertzuiop yes, which is why i said mostly, it is pretty neutral standpoint, and very so consider he is a citizen of said country that is currently in the conflict. Where very often, staying neutral can quickly be seen as something traitorous. Avoiding to prying to much in the cause of the conflict, and rather focus on the current status of the conflict itself.

yes. also it has been independently confirmed that for this current conflict Azerbaijan attacked first.

there's a difference btw Ethnic and belonging to certain religion.

Armenia is billion year's old

İts Albanian churches.

Man todays Armenia was Azerbaijan at start of 1820 then russian empire killed azerbaijan turks and replace them with armenians , before this areas population was >%80 Azerbaijan turk . USSR just a part of rivalry . Oh and azerbaijan is turkic they come from same turkic group with anatolian turks

It seems contradictory but it's true. The root cause was the border line gerrymandering done by USSR to suit Russian needs not the needs either of the two countries. Any nationalist movement during the Soviet era was out of question with KGB present everywhere. So people were friends. After it's collapse the pot exploded and people thus became enemies. Similar case was the disintegration of Yugoslavia.

Yes dude. He said about INDIVIDUALS, but nations as states were driven in hate due to the border issue. Think dude think

Why?

He is azerbaijani and is biased

@@djordjerasic7482 😱😱😱😱. No way! How could a dude whos country involved in conflict be biased about it! Hope you understand the sarcasm. P.S everyone in my country me included are in support of liberation of our home land.

@Ponta nope im not armenian, my name doesnt even look armenian. Im Serbian, and im being objective

@@emilturangi7145 ofc its normal for him to be, but thats why people shouldnt take this video as the truth

you have been brainwashed by your government about us. Check within yourselves. Is there anyone similar?

@@FartingFlyingTurtle not brainwashed he simply asked if yall azeris getting conscripted or not, which is NORMAL in every country at war with other country. he's not slandering azerbaijan reread his comment

Conscripted unlikely, but sharing vehicle casualty figures, approximate military positions could be considered a seditious act in time of war

No, azerbaijan doesn't need that kind of support right now, limited conscription you can say. But armenia is desperate and they are calling everyone, I've heard about under 18 years old soldiers in armenian side, that may not be true to be honest but its a fact that armenia is heavily losing the war right now

@@ibnu9969 misunderstanding with word...

There are few more sides involved now. England (BritishPetrolium and mining business) and USA governor, who holds 12% of the mining company. We are talking about half a billion or more $ projects, that had been signed with Azerbaijan and been frozen for a while. All of the projects are on the territory of Nagorno-Karabskh. These companies/government’s administrations are so greedy that they are ready to sacrifice lives of the innocent people for profit.

if you childkiller supporter then yes

@George nope

if they did not provide this kind of support to Armenia Russia could lost his foot hold on Caucasus .. just thinking about that its understandable .. i mean even tho their relationship with Azerbaijan is not bad .. its not the greatest as well .. Armenia-Russia relationship on the other hand goes back a lot .. its understandable that they dont wish to lose that .. afterall ethnically Turkey and Azerbaijan got friendly relationships .. and Russia probably thinks that they cant top on that frinedship ... i m not saying Russia is doing the right thing or wrong but from their own percpective .. this is the best solution ... they want to get rid of Pashinyan as well so this is the most they can do without loosing the trust of Armenian ppl while probably be able to get rid of Pashinyan cause of this war so at the end of the day .. also lets not forget that they also sell weoponary to both sides tho it may seem like they are giving the weopens to Armenia freely .. i believe they will get their money either lovingly or forcefully :D so everything works well for Russia

The latest update. Russian regular troops were spotted today near Armenian border in the territory of Armenia, as well as Iranian troops near southern borders of Azerbaijan. Both Russia and Iran support Armenia

@@enesakhan4032 I am not sure that everything will work perfect for Russia. All post soviet countries except Armenia don’t want to do anything with aggressive Russia tsar empire

روسيه دن نمه انتظارين وار. بو بالاجا كشور لر هاميسي بيزيمكي ده و بيزيم اولاجاخ. اوندا هر كيم راحت چيليقينان بيري بيرينين يانيندا ياشياجاخ

@Thefirst DIMI F16 are not used at all in this conflict and no one have attacked Armenia. All the conflict is within Azerbaijan.

It's mostly because Azerbaijan is a dictatorship. But hey - they did start the war, but they had ALL the right to start it. It was their land, after all.

@@kestutisvaiciunas8663 Agreed.

@@nitrofiregamingtv1155 Then if Azerbaijan started the war, how is Armenia the aggressor?

Its because Armenia is Christian and Azerbaijan is Muslim, and most of the West is Christian.

@@saskiaviking9447 because pedophile's followers love to chop heads

Since the conflict started in 1988, there is no need to go back 1000 yrs to justify your claim. He focused more on the recent history, because that is what matters. Ie Armenians living in Karabakh in 1700 doesn't mean it belongs to them in 2020.

But this issue does start in 1918 doesn't it? I don't understand why anyone would think pre-history has any bearing on present day geopolitics.

Write one piece of biased info from the video (I dare you!) The report is based on facts and completely neutral.

@@nuru927 biased by a long shot! I don't live in the area, in fact he disregards basic historic facts to suit his narrative in order to promote `recent` events. And it was visible!

@@masoodjalal1152 it is the most foolish thing I ever heard. Why can't armenians pretend to take Baku? As you said, how does it matters who lived there for hundreds of years

i give a big chunk of a "YES" to that my friend

Basically, Armenia had to give up all of the lands that they control to Azerbaijan.

It is a reenactment of the Madrid principles. Armenia has to retreat from non-NK territories, Lachin corridor will be under Russian peacekeeping supervision for 5 years (with the possibility of extending it if both sides want it) while the status of the former Nagorno-Karabakh autonomous region will be resolved in the following years. Negotiations will ensue. Will it work this time? Don't know. Unlike previous attempts, Armenia is now in a bad position. Azerbaijan can now claim that if a decision is not made, they have the military option to resolve the conflict. They are now perfectly capable to take all the territory. Another variable is external interference. Russia does not have the time nor the resources to invest in maintaining peace and stability in the region while Turkey needs a scapegoat to distract its people from the poor state of their economy. We have a long way to go.

@@Kalimdor199Menegroth Thanks for clearing it up. This is the most one-sided conflict Ive seen since the 2nd Iraq war.

@@anngo4140 I'm surprised you never saw the Russo-Georgian war in 2008