Help me make more videos! / neoscribe Boston Dynamics is my favorite robotics company but they need to shift focus from research to business in my opinion. Should they worry about the competition?
Пікірлер: 3 100
@cozmoz3653 жыл бұрын
It's easy to do things at a cut price when you don't do any of the R&D.
@TheAechBomb3 жыл бұрын
the problem with that statement is that they do the r&d themselves it's not like they bought a Spot and just made a knockoff, they engineered these on their own sure they look the same, but that's because the thing they're basing them on is the same
@Cognihaus3 жыл бұрын
Aech Dee not even comparable, BD probably spent hundreds of millions more than this relatively unknown Chinese company. Obviously it’s not like anyone can just buy one and copy it, they will need an efficient team and structure, but if you look them up, it all points to just basic intelectual property being stolen/copied at a simpler level
@Cognihaus3 жыл бұрын
Sloth Armstrong yeah , clearly has been working for chinese companies, since most big tech companies have factories there too they also have ease of production when copying stuff. It doesn’t usually lead to long lasting and stable market, but the cheaper alternatives do have a huge demand to fulfill
@nunyabusiness85383 жыл бұрын
Aech Dee lmao what are you talking about? it’s china....of course they just took spot and reversed engineered it 😂 just like everything else in china it’s a stolen design
@Fuck_Snowflakes3 жыл бұрын
@@TheAechBomb yeah whatever. 100% stolen IP
@sugy7473 жыл бұрын
when aliens will invade us, don't worry, the chinese will make a perfect copy of their tech at low cost the next day
@pitot19883 жыл бұрын
It actually needs skills and technology to do a good reverse engineering and clone. Japan did that, US did that by adopting German tech after WW2... So the cycle of life Iguess
@ALARICFILMS3 жыл бұрын
😆👌🏻
@verdipratama3 жыл бұрын
🤣😋👍
@omotolaoyeniyi6313 жыл бұрын
The Philadelphia company too will be on point to help with also making those copies. So it's closer to home cuz by then, China and US would have banned each other to oblivion 🤣
@nakkabadz64433 жыл бұрын
@@pitot1988 they dont reverse engineer they copy everything and make some adjustment. They look the same they cant change its look because of how the program works they just dont look the same but move the same too
@lemorlenny3 жыл бұрын
copying is less expensive than studying, investing, creating and testing.
@jaysonmokhwanatsi73653 жыл бұрын
Ever had of something called patents.. Unitree is far more manuvarable the don't have the same gates.. Boston is just another hyped up company with the luxury of being American
@shelby2553 жыл бұрын
Uh
@timtunnel19963 жыл бұрын
Chinese companies are good at copying.. 🤔
@ryanhedrick28413 жыл бұрын
@@jaysonmokhwanatsi7365 ever [had] of theft? You edited your comment and still you missed that.
@HustlerEli3 жыл бұрын
@@timtunnel1996 copying is the first step to innovation
@shubhamsehgal23363 жыл бұрын
2020: Even dogs will get unemployed
@johnathanpaige86743 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@datamagic72143 жыл бұрын
dog: fired!😂😂😂
@lendibona75053 жыл бұрын
Haaaaaa....
@icekitty4003 жыл бұрын
Throw a rug around it and get it to bark to keep potential bugulars away from your house. 😂
@randompeople75953 жыл бұрын
But those sniffing nose are hard to replace tho.
@BrotherCreamy3 жыл бұрын
This video seems to blindly assume that Boston Dynamics/Softbank intend to sell their robots as toys to consumers. Boston Dynamics simply aren't targeting consumers. They probably don't mind that companies like Unitree Robotics are ripping off their hardware to sell to consumers. The majority of Boston Dynamics' IP is software anyway, which I'm sure is carefully guarded. The Unitree robot may look similar to Spot at first glance, but you can be assured that Spot has many more features and is a much more polished platform. The $75,000 price ticket does not reflect manufacturing costs, it is recouping R&D costs. As a toy, a robot dog really isn't that useful or entertaining, and will see limited sales with a price that is puts it out of reach of most consumers. Boston Dynamics knows this, which is why they're targeting military/industrial applications.
@rusmiller8163 жыл бұрын
Chinese software engineers are nothing to sneeze at. They have very talented people. To discount them is foolish. And dangerous.
@BrotherCreamy3 жыл бұрын
Lance Monotone Kindly point out the part of my comment where I discounted Chinese software engineers.
@gameintheglitch18603 жыл бұрын
Lance Monotone I agree talented at stealing cause you still need talent for that 😂
@rusmiller8163 жыл бұрын
@@gameintheglitch1860 The red-pilled can believe whatever conspiracy they want; it doesn't change the facts out here in the real world. In the end, it doesn't matter how the Chinese got ahead of us. I have read that their coders are every bit as good as ours, others say they must have stolen their knowledge because American brains are exceptional against all evidence to the contrary. Shrug. The only thing that matters is that they have it and know what to do with it.
@BrotherCreamy3 жыл бұрын
@@rusmiller816 I said nothing about Chinese engineers. It's obvious that the A1 is a blatant ripoff of Spot. A reasonable quality ripoff by the looks of it, but a ripoff nonetheless. Regarding the featureset/completeness of each product, all you have to do is visit each company's respective website and read the documentation. Spot is an industrial product with extensive documentation, the A1 doesn't even have a user manual. A cool toy, but Unitree has a long way to go before they can be considered a serious player in the robotics research space.
@PhiTonics3 жыл бұрын
First person who makes this dog 5 grand and useable to carry groceries, will be the next big thing.
@DAndyLord3 жыл бұрын
Or as a replacement for a wheelchair.
@alphagt623 жыл бұрын
I’d like to see what a real dog thinks of it?
@Scott_C3 жыл бұрын
See James Bruton's channel.
@flamaest3 жыл бұрын
China will probably have this in a year or two. look at what happened to segway, they went from $3,000 items, down to $300 after China took them over.
@tenslider67223 жыл бұрын
@@alphagt62 go watch the unbox therapy video. the dog started freaking out lol
@ZizoMass3 жыл бұрын
If you like Boston Dynamics, the last thing that you want is a Steve Jobs in the company.
@matthewhuszarik41733 жыл бұрын
Yes you wouldn’t want a COE who built or resurrected multiple multiple billion dollars corporations. Yes continue to loose money until your patrons cut you off and you go bankrupt.
@Darusdei3 жыл бұрын
@@matthewhuszarik4173 you didn't seem to get the point, but i'm not exactly surprised by that fact...
@yega3k2 жыл бұрын
@@Darusdei What IS the point?
@triptabhagoria72792 жыл бұрын
Ahhh yes Steve jobs the guy who took a salary of 1 dollar just to make the company grow will ruin the company.........nice
@BikAss992 жыл бұрын
@@triptabhagoria7279 $1 *to avoid tax :)
@fortyninehike3 жыл бұрын
It’s amazing how cheap you can sell things when you don’t have to pay for R&D! Why doesn’t everybody just steal someone’s else tech?
@m0nk3yman532 жыл бұрын
Because that's not a good thing to do
@user-sg6zh6vr7h2 жыл бұрын
@@m0nk3yman53 yes, a moral obligation towards fair business practices will surely stop companies from partaking in immoral acts that could get them a greater level of profit and influence.
@Vysair2 жыл бұрын
because there's no one to copy from
@Bandito071 Жыл бұрын
Sarcasm people, the chinese are doing what they do best, finding a product that already works and making poor quality versions of it.
@SandyRegion3 жыл бұрын
Wow, a Chinese company which has a direct copy of Boston Dynamics robot which took many years of R&D in only a couple years? Wonder how they did that?! 😂
@chawza84023 жыл бұрын
stealing as usual
@GWT1m03 жыл бұрын
LOL, I guess Ghost Robotics are also thieves eh
@DOI_ARTS3 жыл бұрын
Buy the original, reverse engineer it, sell it cheaper. But of course with shitty quality.
@srykextraodinairecreation99623 жыл бұрын
Talking about quality is a subjective point. If 90% of the world population only can afford cheaper technology then that's how business works. As a businessman, I will chase 90% of buying capability than 10%. Not everyone can buy expensive thing while we can get it at a lower price without compromising the quality too much. For example, if I could buy 10 dollar product which is durability can be up to 1 year why should I buy 100 dollar product for 3 years durability. Don't forget that tech evolving and improving very fast if I spend 100 dollars for 1 product after a year, the technology I have might be not that relevant as what as I got a year before. So should I missed out the new revolution of enhanced product for another year or spending another 100 dollars for the new one. The smartphone is a classic example.
@frijoli95793 жыл бұрын
@@srykextraodinairecreation9962 you mean "theft" of thechnology. China never innovates, they steal and make cheap.
@billrumbley3 жыл бұрын
Once an innovator shows what is possible, others follow more quickly. Just like breaking the 5 minute mile. (Edit: 4 minute mile in 1954, surpassed only 46 days later.)
@albertweedsteinthethuggeni77973 жыл бұрын
You mean 4? 5 was broken probably 300 years ago
@billrumbley3 жыл бұрын
Albert Weedstein The Thug Genius you got me! Roger Bannister 3:59.4 May 6, 1954.
@effexon3 жыл бұрын
@@billrumbley now athletes dont have to innovate, shoe companies do it for them.
@@effexon how do you innovate? You just fucking train hard. Modern athletes train no less harder than older athletes
@TheFarCobra3 жыл бұрын
“A1” eh? ... I guess that means we are a little way from the “T800” series. Which is good news.
@AstheaTV3 жыл бұрын
You might think so now but just wait until they start to self-replicate. It seems T800 is not so far away after all ...
@Ryan_Burger3 жыл бұрын
Unless they jump from S10 to S20 like some smart phones :o
@mikanikz31953 жыл бұрын
Pilipino ka?
@petergriffin46293 жыл бұрын
I just wonder when they'll release the first leged wheel chair. Remembering my late friend Lennart who was bound to a wheelchair that would have been such an incredible upgrade!
@KoolAids-vj1ll2 жыл бұрын
Joe
@bigcheese74922 жыл бұрын
@@KoolAids-vj1ll mama?
@stevenrogersfineart42242 жыл бұрын
Do it. What's stopping you ?
@Pyriphlegeton3 жыл бұрын
2:16 Screen: *"Xingxing"* Neoscribe: *"Ziong"*
@H0B0J033 жыл бұрын
"John, shouldn't we be making these technologies more affordable?" "Naw, i think it's Goodenough"
@AniketGharat3 жыл бұрын
That what I was thinking 😂😂
@SuperLiem3 жыл бұрын
Naw let it B. Goodenough :)
@H0B0J033 жыл бұрын
@Vibrant JAPAN dude- great content man- You've sold me
@theendoftheline3 жыл бұрын
Affordable robots to replace you in your job, thats going to be so great for ya!
@gusmcgussy32993 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂
@simonwirz88863 жыл бұрын
I'm currently working with both (Spot and Unitree A1) and only can say if you spend literally for every part a 7th less as Boston Dynamics sure you'll get an affordable Robot but you'll get what you pay for and as an enginner myself the Unitree feels like a toy and Spot like an industrial solution and an industrial solution will and should never be the cheapest consumer product. It should be made for the task and therefore should be well engineered. Can't say that for the A1.
@stiepanholkien6056 ай бұрын
Are they even the same league? Is the unitree robot as functional as spot?
@lowlanz3 жыл бұрын
Now that Hyundai bought BD, they will surely improve on commercialization department
@jaidenoliver71653 жыл бұрын
Probably yeah, and for sure in their own production and factories.
@drained11773 жыл бұрын
Commercials aint problem shiy Boston dynamics is well known and famous, they need to cut down costs and target a market
@jaidenoliver71653 жыл бұрын
@@drained1177 so far they have a market and are making big money selling these expensively. While companies will buy them no point making it cheaper to appeal to the more common public
@glasslinger3 жыл бұрын
@@jaidenoliver7165 Big screen 4k TVs are EXPENSIVE but are selling like hotcakes! There are a LOT of RICH people in the world!
@jac12073 жыл бұрын
pretty sure BD's main target are contracts. And not necessarily the SPOT model, but their programming. Sure they can sell many SPOT's at $75,000 each, but the real money is either in mass market where they can sell metric more than what SPOT is selling at a massive volume or government/corperate contracts that go into tens or hundreds of millions.
@paulfoss53853 жыл бұрын
Calling the Department of Homeland Security a public safety entity is a bit of a stretch.
@MDF40723 жыл бұрын
Just wait until a gun equiped robot dog points a gun at yah lol
@thesilentwarrior67693 жыл бұрын
@Vibrant JAPAN I'm subbing
@Demurralable3 жыл бұрын
He knows - "... and other ...ah... public safety entities."
@ominous-omnipresent-they3 жыл бұрын
@Vibrant JAPAN Fuck it, I'll subscrie too! Succeed, damn it!
@splatt7king3 жыл бұрын
Can’t wait to see one competing on American Ninja Warrior.
@sethpolevoi40273 жыл бұрын
My university has a robot Nina warrior course. Not legged robots though
@KJ-wf1xz3 жыл бұрын
Check out robomaster competition
@HashknightGaming3 жыл бұрын
Atlas could do it today.
@123darkpassenger3 жыл бұрын
Kind of reminds me of WiFi in Australia, we invented it and yet everyone else in the world has surpassed us and improved on it. Kind of embarrassing when you think about it
@HazyHerbivore3 жыл бұрын
Stolen it you mean
@123darkpassenger3 жыл бұрын
@@HazyHerbivore Can't steal something that was never ours, Australia fumbled the ball and everyone else picked it up.
@dracoii11473 жыл бұрын
Uh no a hollywood actress made wifi that only thing that australian scientist did was transform it and make it better plus this isnt the same since the u.s is the tech hub
@vapeurdepisse3 жыл бұрын
By the same token France invented the internet (minitel). Bet you didn't know that
@icedragonair3 жыл бұрын
Why is there a need to monopolize anything you invent? All of science and computing is the collective effort of thousands of amazingly clever people. Its laying the first stone so others can build a pyramid. I dont think Friedman and the physicists of the 20th century expanding on the theory of relativity mean Einstein dropped the ball, even if Friedman proved Einstein wrong about a static universe. Claiming sole ownership of something only matters if you want to patent it and make money, its useless in terms of pushing humanity forwards. Inventing something that inspires others to work on it is not embarrassing.
@t0x1c.r353 жыл бұрын
Everyone: uses spots for Industries Me: uses him as a dancing buddy
@laprepper3 жыл бұрын
the technology is basically out there for anyone to use the tricky part comes with the programming and visual recognition mostly, not so much getting the servos and step motors to work
@mwanikimwaniki68013 жыл бұрын
Facts. The open source stuff seems great though.
@jesuseyez6193 жыл бұрын
Yeah. Many people that aren’t familiar with control theory often over look how difficult it is tune control algorithms .
@mwanikimwaniki68013 жыл бұрын
@@jesuseyez619 😂The challenge that will hit Engineers in this century will be so great I bet that books will be written about it in the next.
@l0_0l453 жыл бұрын
Boston Dynamics has already open sourced its code on many stuff. They already did the hard work.
@mwanikimwaniki68013 жыл бұрын
@@l0_0l45 🤔Welp Lemme dig my fingers into some of the code.
@r-saint3 жыл бұрын
New battery tech from EVs will advance this industry tremendously. Batteries are getting more and more efficient.
@BetterCallSohal3 жыл бұрын
U own tesla stock
@HoloScope3 жыл бұрын
and more dense, we truly live in a wonderful era
@Lipi198213 жыл бұрын
actually bateries had allmost reached their max in energy density allready...maybee they could get 15%(if that!) more for the same volume , but thats it...
@HoloScope3 жыл бұрын
@@Lipi19821 there will always be more solutions, as you know numbers are infinite
@Lipi198213 жыл бұрын
@@HoloScope enyoj that 1 more milimeter of range 5 years latter...ant then 0,01 mm in next 5...
@Chasmodius3 жыл бұрын
As I understand it, 3D printing can help reduce costs in prototyping and small-batch production, but at this point, traditional tooling is still more efficient for mass production.
@idkhowtoright4792 жыл бұрын
Yes
@ags911 Жыл бұрын
How many units are they producing to sell at $70k is the real question? Maybe it could be more cost effective at their scale?
@JayK1083 жыл бұрын
They need a Steve jobs for what, to make it more expensive?
@Riley_19553 жыл бұрын
Yeah they would need to make it more expensive just to cover his salary.
@Clay36133 жыл бұрын
@Sergio Balaguera Sush, stop worshiping a dead man.
@burgundyknight68263 жыл бұрын
We need to send these robots to the moon and build a moon base
@Scott_C3 жыл бұрын
Would need a massive engineering effort to keep the regolith from destroying it's components. Every flake of it is like a shard of glass. Astronaut's suits were ruined by it.
@Scott_C3 жыл бұрын
You're not wrong.
@31bank3 жыл бұрын
@@Scott_C Why not have wheels on legs that can adjust its height with most of the construction equipment on a robotic arm on the back. The hopping motion of the dog will kick up more moon dust than a slow moving rover. For the wheels can be directly driven with a motor inside the hub.If the weight is too heavy for the motor-in-wheel design, then a motor in the arm connected to a drive shaft directly that goes down to a small differential that can slide up and down and act in harmony with a suspension made of some springy composite material can work too, and possibly the latter design would be easier to make than the prior if you include seals at each component that moves against each other and what separates the components from the inside to the outside world just like many car components .
@Scott_C3 жыл бұрын
@@31bank wheeled robot would make sense. However, take a minute to go research the wheels used on the Moon Buggy NASA made for the Apollo Missions. That may help you understand what you're suggesting.
@1pcfred3 жыл бұрын
They'd only last mechanically a few days. They likely wouldn't work on the lunar surface at all due to cosmic particle bombardment. Space hardware needs to be rad hardened.
@extraemontamontes36183 жыл бұрын
Its so depressing when people like you focus on profitability instead of pushing the boundaries and making the most advanced tech possible...
@misterpotato4273 жыл бұрын
Yes, Spot is not meant for the average consumer but instead focused on Industrial and probably military applications. And Spot probably had more High quality parts and functions. Its not only about the money.
@byates593 жыл бұрын
Companies that are not profitable go out of business and in the private sector profits are needed in order to push the boundaries! Only government can push the boundaries without making a profit because they have tax slaves like you and me!
@freedomordeath893 жыл бұрын
you potato, what drives progress and development IS PROFITABILITY! No one works for free. Humankind ALWAYS developed new technology, BETTER technology beause of PROFIT. People invent stuff to do things better, faster and CHEAPER so that they will PROFIT off the time saved by using new tech, you are totally ignorant about what technology is. Without the PROFIT INCENTIVE you have stagnant societies like tribals societies or communists. Have you even wondered why North Korea is stuck in the 1960? Because there's no PROFIT INCENTIVE so no one uses better technology or tries to improve things. Why would they? They don't get paid more...so why bother taking years inventing new stuff?
@bc55883 жыл бұрын
You’re calling someone a potato while also making wildly stupid claims. R&D for tech is expensive, and if you want to innovate, you’re going to need to pay expensive specialists (roboticists, engineers, electricians, software devs) to play around with technologies-unprofitably- and sort out their potential/applications. For ex, Hyundai owns a controlling stake in Boston Dynamics. it’s not profitable for them now, but they have many other sources of profit that can offset their losses here. Because the technology they’re funding could have real utility in the future, they’re hoping their bet pays off. Also, North Korea has been subject to strict sanctions from the western superpowers for over half a century, and is basically cut off from the rest of the world economy. Tourism, immigration, new knowledge and strong international partnerships? Forget about it. This seems to be generally why they struggle. Communist social/political structure can be used with free market characteristics, as is the case with China, which does not consider itself truly capitalist. And they’ve progressed quite quickly in very little time. You’re not smart
@freedomordeath893 жыл бұрын
@@bc5588 you double potato, you invest into companies because you hope for future gains. When people invest in Boston dynamic they expect it to become profitable in the future.. Do you seriously think the opposite its true??? China is NOT communist lol North Korea is NOT poor because of sanctions. Sanctions are only on guns, you double potato. That's the excuse dictator use to quell the protests. "no guys it's totally not my fault why u have to eat grass, it's the evil US banning us from having nuclear missiles, if only we had them you could be eating better" You realized the nonsense you write? No one is stopping tourism or immigration in NK. You can buy a ticket and go there.. Why don't you? Answer me.
@mrmotorcycle94593 жыл бұрын
"I don't know who would have a use for Parkour robots" Disney would be interested for Disney world attractions where dangerous stunts are done by people. They're ready developing them
@beckyboop35173 жыл бұрын
Military and police. Thats who BD are aiming for.
@lordfly9113 жыл бұрын
A big push for robotic development was the nuclear disaster in Japan.
@michaelpettersson49193 жыл бұрын
A robotic cop in pursuit of an outlaw?
@JosephFlores-yn4yi3 жыл бұрын
@@michaelpettersson4919 a ROBOCOP
@MyHandleIsGood3 жыл бұрын
Boston Dynamics definitely have the fan base to go commercial.
@sr_aron3 жыл бұрын
What do you mean when you say commercial
@adgVelaepyaety2 жыл бұрын
@@sr_aron What he means is that they have the fanbase to go into the consumer market.
@noelr93763 жыл бұрын
A good example is Honda’s ASIMO, where did that go?
@another1commenter7703 жыл бұрын
Jumped on the back of the prototype honda D18 and escaped human capture to start the robotic rebellion from a inhospitable wasteland near fukushima power plant.
@gluttonousmaximus90483 жыл бұрын
Robotics that imitate basic human structure/movements/coexistence don't seem as commercially viable as something more specialized, like a rescue bot or something.
@pc12gauge3 жыл бұрын
@@gluttonousmaximus9048 is commercially viable unless is too expensive. Most basic jobs for humans require basics set of motions. And the think is basic human motions, like leg movements, are far more flexible then whelled motion. And besides huge costs, far bigger then todays robots, ASIMO had problems performing basic motions and was very slow for most of them. You are making a dumb comparisson.
@smorrow3 жыл бұрын
Was that ever supposed to be a product?
@mangkanor1653 жыл бұрын
US acquire them....
@rfwillett24243 жыл бұрын
In reality the simile is between Microsoft, and just about every other software company of the eighties. While everybody else was doing technology, Gates was was doing business.
@Tiger1x13 жыл бұрын
In future these ai machines will share those clips saying " see how a human kicking our ancestors its time to avenge"
@fblua3 жыл бұрын
*BD has unlimited amount of money because all comes from US Army; you know all that taxes we paid go to.*
@somebodyyoudontknow26633 жыл бұрын
why is the background trying to hypnotize me?
@tonybloodloss3 жыл бұрын
They want YOU to become their Steve Jobs
@EpicSpaceflight2 жыл бұрын
The hardest and most important part of engineering is driving down the cost of amazing tech until it is compelling enough to he affordable.
@HR-yd5ib3 жыл бұрын
The title should read: "Why the world should be worried about Chinese IP theft".
@AshleyBrown-fj3wh3 жыл бұрын
Basically. Who cares if the Chinese or other parties steal the tech, they won't innovate on it because thats not what they care about. They just want to profit off it as long as possible until it becomes outdated and they have to buy another to steal a new design. Well that and generating tons of e waste with products that go straight from the production line to the landfill.
@HR-yd5ib3 жыл бұрын
@@AshleyBrown-fj3wh , China is filing more patents than any other nation actually.
@AshleyBrown-fj3wh3 жыл бұрын
@@HR-yd5ib yeah that'll happen when you have a billion people with the potential to file them. Look I'm not saying the Chinese are bereft of creativity or other such racist nonsense, but to pretend they don't steal designs and ignore patants and copyright law is pretty foolish.
@HR-yd5ib3 жыл бұрын
@@AshleyBrown-fj3wh , hence my suggestion to change the title of this video!
@puzzled0123 жыл бұрын
yeah, it is not like Chinese ever beat US in anything, like, i dunno 5G...
@churblefurbles3 жыл бұрын
Robots you can bang, that's the future.
@chrisjenkins99783 жыл бұрын
😂🤣😂 Yep. 😂🤣😂
@barriewright28573 жыл бұрын
That's going to happen watch the porn industry...! If it's going to happen they are the ones to do it.
@leninalopez29123 жыл бұрын
How could it be any other way in 'murica? (? xD
@kruleworld3 жыл бұрын
@@barriewright2857 Someone once told me, a new technology has matured as soon as the Porne industry uses it in a substantial way.
@MouseGoat3 жыл бұрын
To make a robot that can walk is easy if compared to a robot that can give you hugs and comfort. Its not like anyone wants to fuck a hung of metal, what we all seek is deeper and way more complex interaction. So i have my doubt about sex robots, and if we ever make a robot cable of feeling human enough to imitate love. we gonna run into the AI problem of the singularity. In fact I feel pretty secure in saying its stupid dream that'll never come true, because sex is more than putting stuff in holes. An here is why: Without a truly human feeling brain, its gonna be be huge turn off for most sane people, and with a human feeling brain you no longer have a robot but a human. Because we only want the perfect human, we all know how to spot a fake human, it's in our instincts. so anything less will hit right in the uncanny valley and be a huge turnoff. I do not see how you gonna make a perfect copy of human, that somehow is not a human. All that said, people are probably in the end fine with paying high cash for fake sex, it will mostly only be for men as the robots won't be much more than a glorified sexy toy.
@alexanderbjerkvik3 жыл бұрын
The fact that their competitors cant charge a higher price should give you a hint about who got leverage.
@expressionoffreedom71653 жыл бұрын
There's considerable functionality difference.
@Liofa732 жыл бұрын
If you think $75,000 for a piece of tech like that is expensive for large companies or even research facilities, you need to investigate the cost of other machinery and tech used in labs and workshops today. I think you've missed the point, these aren't meant to be used by the general public for fun.
@FranciscoRodriguez-be6ik3 жыл бұрын
Seriously, his name is John Goodenough!
@eddfasd3 жыл бұрын
Chinese companies are relentless in cut throat competition, they will bring down the cost of a 4 legged robot to that of an iphone, not the 75k of Boston Dynamics.
@youngz13o3 жыл бұрын
For the good of mankind, imagine buying one of these to help your grandparents haul their weekly groceries for them because this relentlessness of chinese competiton
@jamesgathings63643 жыл бұрын
@@youngz13o What village do you live in ? , they just have Uber drop it off on the front porch out in the sticks ? A drone will do it , having the dog carry it ? Not that feasible
@tomsriver28383 жыл бұрын
@@youngz13o for the good of mankind ? You do realize that one of the reasons why Chinese products are cheap is because of Chinese labor. So witch mankind are you talking about. Because it's definitely not these working in the factory.
@maadhujovi95283 жыл бұрын
Have you any idea how overpriced an iphone is?I live in india...For the price of a brand new iphone i could buy a New 100-200cc motocycle.Its ridiculous.Let me give you another example..Hv you heard of the interceptor from re?its probably the cheapest 650cc bike in the states..but in india it costs half of that😂😂😂
@youngz13o3 жыл бұрын
Toms River sorry but you are part of the crowd that lives in a bubble. Do you know who are the 800 million people that were lifted out of poverty? It was the people that worked in the factories
@cybertrk3 жыл бұрын
When you r&d for ten years and some rips you off making it impossible to again make something else amazing
@kruleworld3 жыл бұрын
How much of that chinese knock off do you think they obtained directly from BD? (official or not-so)
@loungelizard8363 жыл бұрын
You can't tell just from the looks. BD could use for copyright or design patents if people could confuse the two products, but no telling what is copied and what just basically works because form follows function.
@alphagt623 жыл бұрын
It looks as though they bought one and reverse engineered it, they are far too similar. They could have at least changed the aesthetics a bit.
@jamesgathings63643 жыл бұрын
Its the feeling you get when you go on Alibaba and see your design copied , And its only half price , China passes the "slavings" on to you ! I ended up just "Leaking" the designs I knew would fail , Looked good on paper , prototype showed numerous core problems Let them waste there time and resources
@allenphilip23283 жыл бұрын
Chinese 🤣🤣
@rock3tcatU2333 жыл бұрын
Boston Dynamics needs to make the programming and distribution of apps for their robots as easily as possible, that way they can become the PC of consumer robotics.
@ewraticcreations82773 жыл бұрын
I like the analog but I do not think that is Boston dynamics Job. With PCs users Flunder usecases themselves Spot. Many users became experts and published Software, way more than a Single manufacturer alone ever could... Given enough time and granted that the spot Plattform is open for this I see a lot of Potential in these things. But remember the days when only 400 PCs have been Sold... there is still along way to go, such communitys usually Take time to grow. Spot is a really gute step though, as atlas will be and I guess one that will o ly really be understood in a faraway, future, what a great time to live in and watched this development
@stranger60223 жыл бұрын
It really depend on what customer the company is targeting on. Anyway, Boston Dynamic is my tea as it means creativity. Someone already said that to make something cheaper is much more easy than create something new, and it's true. To keep the creation we need to "keep" the creators
@rodd10003 жыл бұрын
To be fair, you don’t discuss the technical differences between the two. Whilst the Chinese knock off might appear similar to BD’s Spot, I’m pretty sure Spot is in a completely different league in regard to technical ability and real word applications. One is a toy, the other a scientific instrument.
@churblefurbles3 жыл бұрын
is it? spot doesn't have much intelligence on its own, you have to program it to do tasks, very far from a siri automated helper.
@softb3 жыл бұрын
@@churblefurbles siri spies on you
@rodd10003 жыл бұрын
Churble Furbles so what’s your point? Spot does have learning abilities, it can map the area it walks, and adapt. As well as having many ways to expand its sensors and functionality. It’s primarily designed to function in industry, not an expensive toy. Not forgetting ALL devices require a level of programming since true AI isn’t here. It’s a matter of selecting the tool that fits the purpose.
@softb3 жыл бұрын
@@rodd1000 shhh don't tell the idiot he's an idiot
@olaruud93663 жыл бұрын
Didnt he mention that Boston Dynamics are still big step ahead technologically, his argument is that without a business model it is unlikely to stay that way for long.
@paulstaker88613 жыл бұрын
U can expect innovating companies like boston dynamics to show less progress reports (cool robot videos) publicly in the future. Thanks, Winnie.
@TesserId3 жыл бұрын
Being an American company, could some of this relate to a focus on military applications--with the history of an over-priced industry?
@lukenfoci3 жыл бұрын
I work for nuclear industry, and Chinas stuff is last thing you want. I used to work for a company that designed and manufactured bespoke ROVs that would cost well more than $74k. Still, specification of environment, requires best possible equipment. It may cost less to purchase a Chinese knock off but it can cost more in time to resolve any issues, problems, instabilities, and projects not delivered on time. So I would not worry about BD as long as they deliver reliable equipment.
@blahsomethingclever3 жыл бұрын
Looks like unitree just copied Boston, and I mean flagrantly copied (stole) their design, now is selling below market price to starve the competition. That's just vile
@JasonC6833 жыл бұрын
actually Unitree launched their product to customers a few months before Boston Dynamics did. Also there are about 100 different quadrapeds which all look the same. This isn't cutting edge. It was announced to the world like 10 years ago, which is just after the 1st iphone. Now every phone in the world almost looks the same. You can learn to build them yourself online.
@arthurzettel66183 жыл бұрын
AGREED.....
@blahsomethingclever3 жыл бұрын
@@arthurzettel6618 dude I saw your reply but totally forgot the context. Please elucidate..;)
@blahsomethingclever3 жыл бұрын
Oh I saw the title, it rings a bell. Chinese copying. What do you think about it
@SandyRegion3 жыл бұрын
They obviously stole the technology. China do it all the time.
@MediaCreators3 жыл бұрын
YES! With a $10K price tag, 4-leged robots will fly off the shelves. The $70K+ was simply too much for the average consumer.
@AlecMuller3 жыл бұрын
LOL, yes. Personally, I waited to get my first smartphone until they came down to $5K.
@kubajackiewicz23 жыл бұрын
@@AlecMuller wait what? Smartphones for 5k ?!
@mrsuper74843 жыл бұрын
It’s similar to drone photography/ surveying, only it’s in it’s own specialised role. If your doing maintenance jobs in buildings, vents or tunnels, these small drones are perfect for the task of fitting into small or hazardous spaces. From a business standpoint if this makes a $60,000p.a worker 20% more efficient, you will have already turned a profit on the investment within the first year.
@mwanikimwaniki68013 жыл бұрын
@@kubajackiewicz2 I had to read that again
@chrisjenkins99783 жыл бұрын
A $10K party novelty gets old really fast.
@garretth4072 жыл бұрын
a parkour rbot isnt made for parkour. its to test a robots agility, its balance, its battery life, power usage. so many things go into moving a robot. so yes they made a parkour robot but you have no idea how much of a leap that is if you see it as just a "parkour robot"
@Richi-zi9qr3 жыл бұрын
As long as people call Boston dynamics competition „the other guys“, I don’t think they have much of a problem.
@guffaw17113 жыл бұрын
I wish I could go back in time to 1984, go to a Terminator premiere, pick a few people after the show, get them in a room and show them this YT video. The reactions I'd get would be priceless.
@aztro.992 жыл бұрын
they would 400 percent shit themselves or pass out lmao
@orien2v23 жыл бұрын
Just like anything new, _how can we weaponize it?_
@usser11383 жыл бұрын
I find it hilarious he just said a salesman was a visionary and an engineer just wanted to create stuff.
@kummer453 жыл бұрын
US makes research and development. Chinese scientist copy paste the next day selling cheaper. Are these news?
@richardsledgecock21103 жыл бұрын
Yeah communism is too restrictive for inventive creatively. So they copy stuff
@iternityhuman17823 жыл бұрын
I agree with you imagine if BD had a Musk type person leading the company what a difference. Marc Raibert stated that the use cases for their bots are Emergency Response, Parcel Delivery, Security, Entertainment, Warehouse Iogiistics, Elderly & Disabled Care. I hope BD takes your advice also I want to see a competition human vs bots in Olympic type sports. Seems they need to power a bot for at least 8 hours of use and build up from their, the battery tech is not their yet!
@michael-dm2bv3 жыл бұрын
if you don't think musk is heavily and secretely funded by the gov't you need to lay off the meth.
@arthighland42933 жыл бұрын
Very interesting comparison, seems that black robots from Unitree has more features than the robots from Boston Dynamics, it can totally flat, then rotating back to walking position. Also seems it has less bulk size. If it can carry 5kg, this is really something to end-user market. The price is definitely something will determine the winner of the market.
@pdxnet96studios Жыл бұрын
So can Spot... And Spot carries 14 kilo...
@Ompasikom3 жыл бұрын
It's fun seeing our future robot overlords while they're still young and cute
@mpoelsma75613 жыл бұрын
When do we get the first domestic house robot who can do the diches, dusting, vacuum cleaning, cleaning the toilet and bathroom, washing, ironing, cooking and gardening?
@MrFarkasOfficial3 жыл бұрын
It’s simple: the military.
@garigari89373 жыл бұрын
I love Boston Dynamics passions to give their best on their robots instead of cutting off price for certain parts just to make their robot relevant than the others. Other companies make cheaper robots but people will look up to Boston Dynamics as the best in the robotics business
@paulfrischknecht39993 жыл бұрын
What makes you think the 74k $ retail price are their production cost for a spot robot? Do you really mean production cost as in materials and assembly costs? I am convinced the price is chosen to agree with what buyers are prepared to pay and is supposed to cover some of the huge R&D costs over the anticipated number of sales...
@terrysouthwood47573 жыл бұрын
Boston dynamics are not selling to retail but to military and engineering customers. The robots are high specification, high load carrying and capable of working reliably in dangerous environments. They are semi-autonomous tools for industry not a toy for public play things. In view of this $70K is not expensive for these customers.
@JJ-si4qh3 жыл бұрын
“Developed” by Unitree
@missyxixi3 жыл бұрын
J J yeah just skip all the other amurican companies doing the same thing and blame the chinese company, real class.
@sohai1763 жыл бұрын
Winnie the pool
@yourhandlehere13 жыл бұрын
@@missyxixi Hey, just show us one of those "other companies" claiming to have "developed" it and we'll laugh at them too.
@bmogsy9673 жыл бұрын
@@missyxixi there are no other companies, this is literally the iron man meme where Ton Stark shows how behind all the other countries are, they literally stole the idea and built a toy that wont do what it was made for
@ETERNlTUS3 жыл бұрын
Just my opinion: - Just because they look the same, doesn't mean China have spies or reverse engineer the BD's robot.. It looks like that because it follow the shape of 4-legged animal. And just because the outer shape looks the same, doesn't mean the internal hardware and software also the same. - I don't think military is interested with (current) BD's robots. It's slow, expensive, and one bullet is enough to disable it, if you add metal armor, it'll be even slower. Flying or wheeled drone is more suitable for military use.
@solomonkahn7133 жыл бұрын
I don't think it's for direct combat
@DoctorMobius3 жыл бұрын
"Welcome to your Daily Dose of Internet" voice
@random6033 Жыл бұрын
It's like comparing a professional drone to a toy
@balonytheonly39303 жыл бұрын
'They have the Tesla, they need the Edison!!'
@dougm30373 жыл бұрын
The Boston Dynamics boys should have a serious chat with Elon Musk who is currently a mass production guru. The only man on earth to establish a space ship production line.
@nickward12773 жыл бұрын
Just think of how much fun they would have with their robots on the Moon or Mars! Imagine the acrobatics they could do!
@LuMaxQFPV3 жыл бұрын
Good idea! He is currently using at least one Spot at his Boca Chica Spacex manufacturing and testing facility.
@darkfrei23 жыл бұрын
> The only man on earth to establish a space ship production line. Just Factorio
@janiemiller8253 жыл бұрын
I’m sure Elon will have 🤖 on Mars building base camp etc
@rockstarxxx60093 жыл бұрын
No need for ELON in this case. ATLAS should just learn to assemble itself.
@LOKI123ification3 жыл бұрын
It seams to me that BD aggregates money for development. I think this is fine, I'm also a developer and happy when I just can build my ideas. Maybe a concept like ARM would work, deliver the concept /software for a license. Forcing a developer to aim for money will kill their joy on developing stuff (happened to me).
@hubdeep94523 жыл бұрын
Cyberdyne Systems have some interesting developments along with Skynet.
@user-ol7bt4wp1j3 жыл бұрын
Everyone gangsta till one of the bots asks for a Plasma Rifle in 40 watt range
@MisterXXXMaster3 жыл бұрын
Dont you forget the military-industrial comples where Affordability isnt that important because the Military will pay for the best espically in the US with there Military Budget. And so i guess they will focus on that market where you can earn damn good money (for example lokk at Lockheed ).
@laprepper3 жыл бұрын
Why do you think I went to school for a MS in mechanical engineering?! To be a robot supervisor or repairman 🤔😁😂
@AtlasGaming4k3 жыл бұрын
Clearly a repairman
@michaelpettersson49193 жыл бұрын
Repairman and your robot overlords will let you live. 😄
@halllwd943 жыл бұрын
It wouldn't surprise me if they stole the designs from Boston Dynamic shortly before that company was started. Then modified it just enough to not infringed on patents.
@TaskSwitcherify3 жыл бұрын
A response from the CEO or CTO or just anyone from Boston Dynamics would be appreciated! Can you interview them?
@Donatellangelo3 жыл бұрын
There's the SOLO8, too. Open source to boot. :)
@mechanicalrocketeer49003 жыл бұрын
Everything in tech needs competition other wise they’ll just have high priced units until competition comes in the game and offers cheaper prices
@panduadikara90783 жыл бұрын
any competition in the tech world would only make the market better and better in terms of price, quality, and value for customers
@SerBallister3 жыл бұрын
We need pressure on innovation not price. Price pressure means R&D becomes too expensive and innovators cannot enter the market, so you end up with a race-to-the-bottom with everyone selling the same cost-cut-to-the-bone design.
@JosephFlores-yn4yi3 жыл бұрын
@@panduadikara9078 any competition in any time of market is good Hell, even in an individual level, competence can be good
@Alternity6663 жыл бұрын
Steve Jobs would double the price just by applying a Mac logo on the thing, I'm not too sure that it would be a good idea.
@cyclops82383 жыл бұрын
Actually it was after Steve Jobs died the Apple started using their name to overprice their products.
@cyphre3 жыл бұрын
"I'll believe i t when I see it" as the saying goes. Intent to produce something at an affordable price is in no way related to actually achieving that goal. That chinese robot already looks like it's using the exact same movement software as Boston Dynamics, so I wouldn't put it past Chinese sticking to their regular theft of intellectual property.
@joreal713 жыл бұрын
Copyright in china means the right to copy.
@neoscribe22953 жыл бұрын
😂
@JigilJigil3 жыл бұрын
Good one and so true.
@williamxu24023 жыл бұрын
Proof?
@LokeKS3 жыл бұрын
Boston published their research eg www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/Marc-Raibert-2083226138
@rubbyrisdiansyah14703 жыл бұрын
Imagine 1:1 gundam in Japan has movement system by boston dynamics
@DveSedmicky3 жыл бұрын
its literally a toy from the Chinese. Robots from BD are for sure heading into the military field or heavy-duty stuff like firefighters, underwater, hazard environment etc...
@willienelsongonzalez46093 жыл бұрын
It would be fascinating to see all of these robots in a “head to head” challenge, my point being that although some of the competitors maybe cheaper that isn’t necessarily synonymous with better. I think the narrator in the vid is correct, Boston Dynamics definitely need something with the drive and insight of a Steve Jobs or Ellon Musk like figure.
@pottasium71173 жыл бұрын
>chineese "developed" >looks more or less the same as the og hmmmm*
@pottasium71173 жыл бұрын
@@woodypigeon thats what soviets/chineese always did. The copied a design and either improved it slightly or made it worse due no quality control... But its still copying either way
@Kah76543 жыл бұрын
@@pottasium7117 So would the world (other than Germany) please stop making cars which are all copies of the original design made by Carl Benz.
@bazoo5133 жыл бұрын
Good. Then _you_ make one. Easy-peasy, no?
@pottasium71173 жыл бұрын
@@Kah7654 implying that major improvements on old shit and copying (with downgrading or slight changes to the design ) is one and the same
@pottasium71173 жыл бұрын
@@bazoo513 give me as big of a budget as those companies have and just as many personel and sure, even a monkey could lead a group of engineers with big budget without resorting to espionage
@johnnyspacer94883 жыл бұрын
SpaceX should buy Boston Dynamics ....
@hasnat95453 жыл бұрын
Boston Dynamics owned by Softbank. Softbank has Share in Tesla. Softbank owned Oneweb ( now bankrupt) Oneweb is similar service like Starlink of SpaceX , bt forced to shutdown.
@marcus_w03 жыл бұрын
@@hasnat9545 Also, Boston Dynamics was owned by Google until they decided not to get into the military grip trifactor in 2016. It was then for sale quite some time and as far as I know, Elon Musk gave it a pass.
@omniyambot98763 жыл бұрын
@@marcus_w0 yep, really it's not sustainable for a long time
@testpuddle3 жыл бұрын
Excellent perspective and commentary.
@infoscholar52213 жыл бұрын
Good video with a very salient point. Hope BD sees this.
@salmsnbaqmi6843 жыл бұрын
I really liked the analogy of John Goodenough it's a really sad story imaginging the amount of time he took to develope the Lithium Ion batteries and not being compensated for that achievement as he should. He is actually working on developing a promising new type of batteries that could change the landscape of energy storge
@lemonrand13 жыл бұрын
Lucky innovators and techie people like goodenough isn’t business-minded.. else we won’t hv Steve jobs ‘s apple
@lifeshaman61483 жыл бұрын
If I see them things running through fields I might renew my hunting license
@balonytheonly39303 жыл бұрын
I'll hunt one of those!!
@barriewright28573 жыл бұрын
You wouldn't be able to move fast enough to aim and shoot one if it's a military version, which it would see you first before you even new it was their, Skynet is coming .
@Shine3652 жыл бұрын
Boston Dynamics is clearly the winner when it comes to robots. I have been exploring bots and Spot outshines the rest.
@Dindonmasker3 жыл бұрын
Michael reeves is gonna be pissed that he could've bought that 10k one instead of a 100k one XD
@tacos_with_sauce88873 жыл бұрын
It wouldn't have been able to hold the beer though
@TrueREAL3 жыл бұрын
The 10k one is just ripping bostons hardware. Bostons mostly sells software. Bostons robot is in every way superior
@PacoOtis3 жыл бұрын
Well done Dude! Very insightful! We owe you a beer!
@GhostMonkey7723 жыл бұрын
Boston Dynamics like you said builds advance robotics they are pioneers of the industry. Its about knowledge not application.
@K3S01L23 жыл бұрын
Boston Dynamics price is not coming from the manufacturing but the chinese copies probably are. Also BD doesn't need consumer markets to make their business profitable.
@JesseIngalls3 жыл бұрын
John Goodenough... 💀
@noahbrewer24763 жыл бұрын
I’ve always felt really suspicious about those guys.
@bekindbethoughtful46403 жыл бұрын
Good point. Application application application. An acrobatic robot is a great proof of concept. But can't see a market or use for it in any area of life. As novelty and entertainment it gets old real fast too.
@BerzerkMaggot7773 жыл бұрын
Good video man BUT what if that's just not what they WANT to do at Boston Dynamics??
@chris93523 жыл бұрын
this is what I've been telling them!
@ntt35973 жыл бұрын
As if having a Steve jobs did any good to the world. Does the name Linus Torvalds ring a bell?
@longleaf03 жыл бұрын
I'm not a great steve jobs fan, but credit where it's due, he was fantastic at marketing, presentation and business strategy (why else would people buy mac books? Their specs are sub par at their price point), Linus had a completely different ethos, it's proprietary vs open source, two different goals.
@volka21993 жыл бұрын
@@longleaf0doesnt change what he contributed, which is in reality not too much. Sure he was able to market his company's products well but other than the early innovations in Personal Computers and the iPhone both of which were created mostly by others with him focusing on marketability he didnt do much himself. He is well known due to being the face of the company for so long. He also set the standard within apple of playing it safe over adopting innovations. It's one reason why Wozniak left, Jobs wanted to mass produce and sell a product while Wozniak wanted to explore what could be possible with personal computers. The first apple computer designed by Wozniak had a large role in bringing bringing programmable computers into peoples homes. Without that innovation Jobs could've just as well have been marketing pocket calculators made with smooth aluminum like today's macbooks. He might've done a good job at it but it would just be marketing. Surely there has to be a balance between innovation and consistent reliable products but apple has always had a problem with innovation with a few major exceptions like the apple 2 and iphone but otherwise only gradual improvements and late adoption of new technologies. The locking down of what many people now refer to as the apple ecosystem is also anti consumer in my honest opinion and it was present to a degree long before modern apple. It was all an effort to make sales as high as possible for all their products. It made them money and possibly jump started personal computer usage but not much else. I am just grateful we have open source operating systems and alternatives to apple hardware because if they truly monopolized the smartphone market as Jobs intended by suing android os competition and the computer hardware market we'd probably be pretty far back relative to where we are today. Personally to me he was an aggressive businessman that did help create some huge markets but was anti consumer and anti competitor in a bad way. Instead of beating the competition several times apple opted to try to shut it down and I am happy they failed. I value freedom of all types including freedom to use your hardware however you like since it is your property and not a subscription service.