24/7 news isn’t going to die. It’s simply going to migrate to your phone. I mean it kinda has already. Every day your going to get blitz with notifications and see news compete with your normal content. Honestly, it’s not going to get better

We dont need it. The internet exists. 🤷‍♂️

having docu's to take hours off it would be just better

The constant screaming for attention is tiring…I cut the cord years ago…

I agree. We only needs news a couple times are day. Not 24/7 unless something very special is happening.

Well according to CNN’s rating there are about 400,000 morons

Actually it turns out people are even dumber than we all thought. 😂

People are shockingly dumb. And people are far more interested in the narrative that best represents their biased beliefs. The truth would actually unite both the right and left against the people in power.

@@reneolguin1081 Americans are.

fox news viewers are beyond dumb.

do not need investigate journalism too liberal even for me I'm center-left, we need more professional journalism.

⁠ Bingo. Welcome to the agendemic! Post Bush-era so began the sideism media pit of: echo chambers, cherry picking, white knighting, sjw, anti jw, one-off examples used to paint massive murals of fuzzy pictures, and rallying and rowdying the herds through divisive, clickbait, edgy, and manipulated sludge. Oh there was a gay picture book left by an 8th grade troll in a library shelf? 'The entire school system is broken by horrific libs and queers down to the core!! Oh someone called a teenage Afam "boy" behind a register in Alabama? 'This plague of racism is only spinning worse out of control by the hands of privelaged white americans!' (Totally not uneducated idiots as the most common problem... & Not just 1/100th, of .01%, of a 1/200 urban county, in 1/50 states are those 2 one-off schools the issue, in a nation of 700million+ people...) But now suddenly, everybody grabs their pitchforks and rallies behind their echo chamber herd, and spins up overarching blanket issues out of thin air as stances to hate for and love one another over. This is why I live happily in the mountains outside of an urban area. No politics up here, and all of my neighbors get along with one another, in likely a 60/40 R/D split, by which data supports also.

You are ON POINT. Even though FAUX bought CNN,the programming stayed parallel to FAUX in a way that it is still considered the same as FAUX.

And just who do you think is “telling the truth?”

Candace Owens@@rrpostalagain

@@danieltyler8932 Awesome. Made my day, thx.

​@@danieltyler8932The chick so crazy even Rogan won't talk to her anymore? That's incredible dude 😂

Excellent point the problem of bringing more viewership together with unbiased informations. Therein lies the problem because the truth is in 9 of 10 times something you will not like. Which brings up the real question: Is the profit-motive compatible with the news-sector?

​@@AaronOkeanos "Is the profit-motive compatible with the news-sector?" Comparing to what? I'm watching how after each election in my country tax funded TV is having management replaced, for the one that shares views of newly elected government. I also watched how a few foreign "independent" news channels, were a very expensive way of expressing strong bias of local unelected establishment. There is a different problem with not for profit system - assuming that quality is high, people should willing to pay for such content and it should be self financing, possibly profitable. If you have to force them to pay, then you most likely know the answer concerning value for money.

The people watching fox and CNN want the drama they don't want the news.

Having been in essence a super PAC for several years they needed to clear the air for anyone but the hard left to consider them news and be share information with them.

I think you may want to say “Objective” instead of unbiased. I made the same mistake in my head. Being unbiased has limited utility.

PBS newshour

Reuters and Associated Press

i get that snobby feeling from them, its disgusting

Same with fancy university professors.

Excellent point, at some point journalists, critics, actors, musicians etc. mostly started spewing 'the message'

Very true. Tim the beanie and Styx are more trusted.

@@tadhgcronin175 You're just replacing one set of lying ideologues with another.

I'm 28 and can't remember when that was the case. I'm sure it was at some point, but not in my adult life.

"If you fail to read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you read the newspaper you are misinformed." Mark Twain, 1870

@@The-Contractor Exactly !

There was never a time when the news wasn't bias.... it's just gotten worse. 😊😊

@@ASMRDoodlez I'm 43. It was much better. I'd watch it every morning before work. That is how I saw what was happening, as it was all happening on 9/11. I watched the news before then too.

True, that!

Problem is, this strategy will put you in the right's crosshairs. You will be hailed as a communist and liberal stooge.

truth isn't centrism or neutrality- cnn became a half truth teller- a news model that doesn't age well. fox, cnn and msnbc got/are getting what they deserved and swallowed

Well put 👍

I agree and I think that this video conflates two aspects of CNN’s attempted shift. On one hand, they tried (or at least said they would try) to focus more on fact-based reporting rather than featuring tons of opinion content or constantly bashing Trump. On the other, they tried to capture right leaning tv watchers by firing more prominent trump critics and making content they thought those watchers would like. Those two goals aren’t the same. One aims to focus on featuring the most important stories in a straight analysis-free manner. The other panders to a viewing demographic.

I think a problem is that politics in USA at the moment divides people into two camps, with neither willing to listen to critisisms about their own.

It would be like if an Oakland TV station brought back every story to how it affects the Raiders footballl team. If they talked about how an apartment fire was going to cause the team to be sad, and underperform in next week's game. How the increase in drug use was focused around weekdays, because obviously people enjoy watching the Raiders more than shooting up. How the increase in new housing construction was a boon for the team as it would add fans. Like, we just want the info, not the unrelated analysis of how it will help a (political) sportsbal team.

Let’s be real. CNN is NOT failing because the audience is media literate and therefore reject its superficial reporting. The audience in general are more partisan and thirst for outrage and sensationalism. CNN doesn’t know how to serve this audience. And because it’s a corporate oil tanker, it cannot change direction. It cannot adapt. It lacks agility. Big money, big names, big debts, and no one is willing to make changes for fear of affecting the share price. Too big to succeed

Also for years they accused Trump for everything including bad weather that even people who criticed Trump said: wait a moment that is not true

He said he wanted something like Faux News, which has about 5HR of news news and 19HR of ppl yelling.

Honestly I don't even think that's right either. People want propaganda that reinforces their views, the fact that Faux news (and more recently the newer even more radically right wing Cable news channel competitor) have both done so well for so long proves it. CNN should have just embraced being called too liberal and tried to compete with MSNBC if they wanted to improve their ratings.

I am 53 in a few days and hardly watch TV anymore. It's not just the young.

Born in '91 and don't watch TV as well. I have Netflix, YT Premium, and for everything else, Torrent.

46, and I was never a huge fan of TV in general, let alone TV news. The internet, for all its flaws, has been my primary resource for news.

I haven't watched television in years.

Yes, but that's a big problem. You know why? Because we'll be getting our news from who knows where? At least with news networks you could know who owns them. Do you know who owns any YT channel? Who is giving money to content creators? In some cases yes, but not all. Then, Bob the KZfaqr won't be getting press credentials at the White House, so he's unlikely to have access to get interviews with presidents and prime-ministers. Last, but not least, probably the biggest problem: bubbles. Online is a medium that favours the creation of bubbles. We will never see what news other sides are getting in their bubble and it has happened to me to see someone comment: what about X? And I would be thinking... WTF is X? What are you talking about? The general public needs a baseline of common information/knowledge to have a functional debate across party lines. Otherwise, considering the bubbles, we'll look at one another like we're crazy, not knowing what the other side knows. Division is deeper when this common foundation doesn't exist and for all their faults, cable news media could provide that. Online media, like YT channels, can't really do that. There are big KZfaqrs that I've never, ever heard of, channels with millions of followers, but being outside of my bubble, I wouldn't know. And the same goes for everyone. The internet and social media are too disjointed and decentralized to get a complete picture.

After 9/11 they realized how profitable fear is. The only people who profited more from 9/11 than CNN was the military industrial complex.

That’s ABSOLUTELY ALL FOX is and does

​@@ericcrawford8308Waaa waaa. Funny how Fox is still successful, whereas your limpdick organisations are tanking. Maybe woke bullshit isn't as popular as you want it to be...

No , Fox does have more facts to back. Their news app than CNN ever did ,not that fox is right all the time but way more correct with their news and CNN

⁠@@ericcrawford8308so do you think this video is inaccurate?

@@ericcrawford8308I completely agree w/u. CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS etc all of these news sites EXCEPT for FOX NEWS tell the truth. If u watch them ur not going to hear lies. Here’s just a couple examples: ▪️Fox News claimed that VP Harris had ordered copies of her children’s book to be gifted to migrant children at a Department of Health and Human Services shelter in CA. This was not based on facts & the story was retracted but the misinfo was already out there. ▪️Fox News claimed President Biden is coming for our burgers 🫤 🍔 claiming that Biden’s administration would require Americans to radically reduce the amount of red-meat that they eat due to Biden's climate policy. This is NOT TRUE. Cmon there is truth & there is fiction. At least the other stations don’t blatantly lie about the craziest things! ▪️Do we even want to get into the settlement Fox News agreed to do they didn’t have to go to court w/Dominion which is a much smaller company then Fox. They were sued for DEFAMATION & btw if I were Hunter Biden I would sue Fox News too! He didn’t choose to work in his Daddy’s cabinet like Jared & Ivanka so he should’ve be scrutinized like he’s a public figure. The GOP & Fox care more about his nudes & I start wondering why is that 🤔

Then you be a lot more happy if Warner Bros. Discovery will spinoff CNN.

I feel bad for people at CNN since these idiots are messing with their careers.

Journalistic problems are caused by the journalists. CNN needs to get rid of some very lame commentators. They filled some key positions with very biased people.

@@samoyed81966 Everyone will be a lot happier when all these networks go bankrupt.

I C what you did there

All news is opinions even if you think it looks nicer and sounds nicer or is less abrasive than the traditional media it is still opinions. Your opinion can change which aspects of a topic that are reported which can completely change a news story. Go read a news article on something that you're an expert in from a source that you claim to trust and tell me that it's not an opinion

You're confusing opinions with bias. All news is biased, although some agencies try harder than others to reduce the impact of that bias. News, however, is not opinion. Opinion requires no verification or fact-checking, whereas news does. It's why Fox is so dangerous, because it presents it's opinions in a news format, and never explicitly state that it isn't news (except when threatened with lawsuits) so people think their opinions are true.

No. They've lost credibility because malevolent bad-faith actors have organized and worked hard to discredit them. You know what else has "lost credibility" the same way in these years? Teachers, fact-checkers, doctors and literal fucking **science.**

That’s one of the biggest problems I see with US journalism today. The first newspaper I read regularly had an opinion section clearly marked and on separate pages. Obviously no journalism is completely pure news without any opinion, even just selecting which stories to report is an inherently biased thing. But they tried their best to report as neutrally as possible on the news, didn’t use biased words there etc.

The difference with the "cable news" networks is 100% of their programming is political opinion. The 3 prime networks have "news" segments at specific time slots, with talk shows, game shows, and varieties of drama and comedy genres. News papers certainly have political party leanings, but they also have straightforward reporting in sports and lifestyle interests topics. The cable guys are just lying by calling themselves "news".

Absofrickinlutely😁 somebody understood the assignment. 👍

Of course it does. But when one side consistently lies or is wrong much more often, then “neutral” gets accused of picking sides. Neutral only works if both sides are equally right and wrong at most times. Too often I see people try to be neutral when the actual facts are one sided.

Well, focusing on facts makes one somehow usually go 180 degrees from where the right wing tends to go now.

If anything everyone would like the news less. There's a reason the news is like this, it's more profitable. People are way more willing to sit and watch someone tell them what they want to hear.

@@twelvecatsinatrenchcoat Bingo. Welcome to the agendemic! Post Bush-era so began the sideism media pit of: echo chambers, cherry picking, white knighting, sjw, anti jw, one-off examples used to paint massive murals of fuzzy pictures, and rallying and rowdying the herds through divisive, clickbait, edgy, and manipulated sludge. Oh there was a gay picture book left by an 8th grade troll in a library shelf? 'The entire school system is broken by horrific libs and queers down to the core!! Oh someone called a teenage Afam "boy" behind a register in Alabama? 'This plague of racism is only spinning worse out of control by the hands of privelaged white americans!' (Totally not uneducated idiots as the most common problem... & Not just 1/100th, of .01%, of a 1/200 urban county, in 1/50 states are those 2 one-off schools the issue, in a nation of 700million+ people...) But now suddenly, everybody grabs their pitchforks and rallies behind their echo chamber herd, and spins up overarching blanket issues out of thin air as stances to hate for and love one another over. This is why I live happily in the mountains outside of an urban area. No politics up here, and all of my neighbors get along with one another, in likely a 60/40 R/D split, by which data supports also.

Thank you. There is no such thing as “unbiased” news. It has been harmful for decades to pretend it is something that exists much less is somehow superior and therefore desirable to attain.

You'd have to define 'political agenda'. Media orgs in general may lean left or right or may even favour certain political parties, but usually won't fully stand behind them. The EIC or manager can curtail some heat from a big news story, but if something newsworthy happens to a political party, they're usually on it like flies on shit. Then of course you have the usual tenets that many news orgs abide by, don't be racist, don't be a bigot, etc, and I don't know how many people would call that a 'political agenda' nowadays.

​@@ruekurei88Fox News has left the chat.... 😬

TLDR is funded by global investment firms, so I would not be so sure of that.

Who?

Cut to the next movie and the whole plot is how the Carver Media Group knows about the ship sinking before they do.

😹 Some of us here in the States agree! 😹

I mean, even AI is biased so you can't expect humans not to be

No, there can be neutral news, TLDR is a great example of it.

Based on the fact that among his viewers there are both people who disdain CNN for being far left echo chamber and for daring to once invite Trump, TLDR is reasonable job at not being specially biased.

@@dragos1239AI doesn’t think nor have opinions, so this is irrelevant.

Its is NEVER possible to have unbiased neutral news. Even if you are outside the system you are going to have your own beliefs which may make inclined toward a side.

Go woke go broke....simple math

Assume you don’t watch Fox News for the same reason you give.

I agree.

LOL...did you miss that meltdown at Fox News when Obama was reelected and in 2020 when Biden was elected?

Just out of curiosity! What do you think of Fox News..?

Those rage inducing headlines were bad for the mental health of the nation. So many people died from lack of socialization and from lack of exercise during lockdowns and from stress caused by the actions of corporate media and politicians. "You should be afraid." - CNN, October 2020.

Same. I prefer short summaries of important things that happened during the week, because tgere is just too much noise that I won't remember even in an hour since reading about it.

​@@purplespeckledappleeater8738well unfortunately we had every reason to be afraid because an unhinged lunatic was running the country and had no interest in actually addressing the problem presented by the pandemic. And we could tell it was like a toddler was in charge

@@angelainamarie9656 And the Biden Administration are not behaving like unhinged lunatics? Have you been following the Hunter Biden trials? The Biden Administration is legally incompetent without the protection of the DOJ. Calling a man so wealthy he can fund his own elections without having to make backroom deals for political donations a toddler is shoddy backwards-thinking logic. Most politicians only become millionaires after becoming politicians, thus become plugged into a political machine that many Americans endearingly refer to as "The Swamp". You came up with a bad regurgitated excuse for why someone you don't like is bad instead of listing something they actually did. Trump did address the pandemic through organizing the vaccines and recommending hydroxychloroquine and organizing efforts to manufacture domestic medical supplies for use during the pandemic. I worked in 2020 building hazmat and ventilator packs under the Trump initiative while the US outbid other countries for critically needed medical supplies after China went into lockdown. There is evidence China may have had their leak as early as August of 2019 and were intentionally flying individuals with COVID around the world thus spreading the virus. The first cities in the US to get COVID were New York, LA, and Seattle who refused to shut down initially. In Seattle they knew of a mystery illness and did not report it to the CDC, thus spreading the virus. Leftist mainstream media also confused how to safeguard against COVID all through the Summer of 2020 for months with nonsensical recommendations such as wearing multiple masks that led to people passing out from lack of oxygen, which causes brain damage and lying about the lethality of the virus while simultaneously promoting people go out into the streets of cities to riot, thus spreading the disease. COVID reached the state of Georgia after an African American family from Atlanta had a huge funeral with hundreds of people and many infected people then spread the virus. Democrats did a lot to spread COVID and make the pandemic far worse than it had to be for years including laying off essential workers and military personnel while violating human rights and Constitutional rights. Containing a pandemic risks isolating the disease and creating new variants, meaning the Democrats made the disease mutate through lockdowns. Many Americans didn't die of COVID but died from lockdowns and isolation, became homeless, and mental illness and drug abuse skyrocketed as did violence and crime. CNN was continuously looping overinflated COVID statistics and Trump rallies back-to-back and repeating "you should be afraid" before the election. The Democrats spent $14 billion calling Trump and Republicans racists through propaganda. In Detroit we had literal billboards calling Trump a racist and racial advertising targeting specific voting demographics.

Same here-it seemed like Anderson and Company was and likely still is on a mission to light fires under their audience’s collective ass, to keep them at the edge of their seats!

CNN is free in America and we don't even watch it because it's a propaganda media.

Cable news has always been that way it's not real news. Fox is the same thing

CNN is boring. Two much on politics and politicians repeating the same thing they said yesterday and the day before. CNN is unbalanced to one topic and most airtime is opinion. Let people draw their own conclusions. No more opinions from Sen. LieAlot.

Canadians thinking they can't handle opinion is a non-starter for US audiences who can; often, just not too often, opinions are welcome in getting a handle on how people in another political zoo otherwise "think". When the opinion sticks with being too opinionated by rightwingers, a minute or two causes more than enough for any but their audience to bail. Left opinion actually in the US is stretched across media enough for us to keep listening. The fact the Reicht really only has Fox Snooze and 2 tiny nothingburgers of disinfirmation misleads observers to think they represent the entire country. They don't. See the antiTrump majorities over the last several elections for a clue. If tldr is to mean anything to the young outside of high school age, it should be nonstop Progressive. Which is how 90% of them vote. tldr is too childlike to even attempt it.

​@@craigbhill1

The babyboomers literally ruined everything.

The babyboomers are the ones more likely to watch old media news and so they're trying to get a piece of that demo pie. Not sure how that'll work though, it's not like Fox News is gonna disappear and those viewers already hate CNN, they've now alienated what audience they have, and MSNBC is probably gobbling up more of that marketshare already. Warner Brothers Discovery is making some weird moves.

Basically you are saying you are a snowflake and don't like what they report. Therefore they are 'killing themselves' lol

I mean, younger people are watching biased KZfaq content instead. KZfaq’s political news (more like commentary) is a mess. The only difference is cable news is massive decline. The market for more neutral news like TLDR is relatively small.

If you think it’s just the baby boomers who enjoy being fed their own shit your proving a point beautifully 😂

outrage ?

​@@99guspuppet8 sounds a little left-of-center

@@ohioagainsttheworld676 ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

Ah, so now that the far left has achieved power by crushing people's skulls (Officer Dorn) and dominating the public square during the CHOP/CHAZ Summer of Love, you're sick of it and hungry for centrism and cross aisle collaboration?

over the aisle? With whom? MTG? Boobert? Mitch McTurtle?

But they are less seen on the newsroom.

Brianna hosts in the afternoons while Jim anchors on the weekends. Not all timeslots are viewer magnets, are they? Still, that is far from being fired.

ABC news is owned by disney. My wife and I gave up on watching it when the purchase was made. I don't know which is worse 1 crazy rich owner or the biased employees of a giant company, who don't even own massive amounts of the company's stock, using the power of the company to force news organization to tow their personal lines.

Biden had humans falling of airplanes.

CNN isn't all that significant around the world. Just cos it's American doesn't automatically make it the world news. It's almost entirely American news, from an American perspective, for American audiences. This bias, which it shares with its rivals Fox and the rest btw, is its most common - and normalized - form of bias, which is entirely taken for granted by its audience as they themselves mostly hail from America and see things the same way. It's not even considered political, but it very much is.

It is downright disgusting. And in the case of CNN, it leaves traditional viewers disoriented and dismayed seeing this lurch towards the GOP. And in the run up to 2024! MSNBC is my new home.

MSNBC? Cough cough. You need to get out more.@@ALFarrell-kv6ok

Very true.

I remember when Sean Hannity literally came on stage at a Trump Rally and gave a speech like that's a normal thing for a "journalist" to do.

@@twelvecatsinatrenchcoat Hannity doesn't pretend to be a journalist

@@DMS-pq8 Fair enough but still, it's not great. Like you are propaganda at that point. You are Party propaganda, you're Pravda.

@@twelvecatsinatrenchcoat As long as he doesn't claim to be a journalist and makes it very clear he has a side than its okay, The true danger are people who claim to be independent journalist who are in reality activist who only present the news in ways that help their side and hurt the other side

"Hate" is a strong word.. Why do you hate this particular news network? Is there a network you "love".? .Fox, for example?

@@daydays12 Fox is controlled opposition, ALL mainstream news media is garbage, and I too hate CNN

To paraphrase Mocha Jesus: "You're on the right side of history."

Corporate media are owned by criminals trying to present the system they own as the good side, and real democracy as the bad side.

😂

Imagine thinking unbiased news ever existed 😂

@@LyricsFred The newspapers and reporters have always been biased.

@@morkthenonelib thats what im saying. There is no “good ol days”. Its always like this.

@@LyricsFred You can go back to the 1800s and see the biased reporting easily. You would think the media would try to hide this if they do not want fix this. But in reality the media just doesnt care they just openly slam anyone that is not in agreement with them. The sad part is the way people do not see this.

As opposed to the 60's, 70's, 80's (before 24/7 BS), what we have now is blatant lying and gaslighting, as opposed to having just a very small degree of slanted nonsense b4 24/7 vomit-fest, even you can see that right? 😆 @@LyricsFred

Can’t stand the obvious bias in all mainstream media. How they keep any viewers is beyond me.🤷🏽‍♂

CNN stop being news source after Ted Turner sold it. All cable "News" is entertainment

and are never going to get

Essentially..!

Yes

Yup, they budlighted themselves.

@@williamdavis9562 by the way, Kid Rock was caught sneaking sips of Bud Light. Hypocrisy is everywhere.

Yes but less so

Well said.

You don't make any money teaching people. How do you make money doing that? You make money by CONTROLLING people.

Thank you, I thought I had missed the sale of MTV Networks to Warner.

I don’t consider TLDR “fact based journalism”. I don’t know how anyone could. Unless they are unable to take in the reporting uncritically.

well. I trust them

​@@BlackDoveNYCWell, TLDR are relatively central leaning and give their opinions based on the facts, rather than political biases.

I take the most moderate and logical position; take information from all sides and you roughly could find the facts somewhere in the middle. I'm kinda surprise they mention the BBC and it's quite dumb to fully trust everything on BBC other than none political stuff. And talking about Trump, you're be surprise that people in the Gulf likes Trump more than other US president through my own experience (One main reason: He didn't start a war in the Middle East.)

@@thoriqakbaryou’re a fool then 🤡

Wouldn't be a TLDR video if they didn't screw up somewhere...

Time Warner was known as Warner-Annex.

The right has moved further to the right. However CNN didn't stay where it was. Starting in 2015 there was a notable and significant leftward shift

@kylejacobson9587 The question is a shift starting from where on the right left range? As an European I can tell you CNN feels very much right in the center right now. So maybe it started out center-right I don't know. Of course many of the concepts that are deemed "radical left" in the US, like universal health care and gun laws are a staple of our system and are not considered left leaning at all, so maybe that's why it puzzles me. Just saying that to us your left/right scale seems all skewed right.

@@JohnDowson100 Left-Right is only a useful description within a country, and looses meaning the further you zoom out, the less comparable it gets. The American left is to the right of the European center on a variety of issues, such as the ones you listed. However there are areas where Europe is more right wing. For example, the Northern European states are generally recognized as regulating business less than the US. Also the American left is significantly to the left of Europe's left, generally, on issues of race, immigration, LGBTQ issues, and abortion(although, outside of Central Europe, the American right is likewise to the right of the right of most of Europe, there doesn't exist much middle on those issues)

@@JohnDowson100 Left-Right is only a useful description within a country, and looses meaning the further you zoom out, the less comparable it gets. The American left is to the right of the European center on a variety of issues, such as the ones you listed. However there are areas where Europe is more right wing. For example, the Northern European states are generally recognized as regulating business less than the US. Also the American left is significantly to the left of Europe's left, generally, on issues of race, immigration, LGBTQ issues, and abortion(although, outside of Central Europe, the American right is likewise to the right of the right of most of Europe, there doesn't exist much middle on those issues)

@kylejacobson9587 There are a few issues like this, you are right 😀 just saying overall CNN doesn't feel left leaning at all to us, it feel even center right on many issues. It looks a bit like the meme of the KKK murderous crowd facing the equal rights protesters with the guy in the center weaving the "compromise?" sign.

What's more, Paramount Global also owns CBS.