True. I've also argued that people are very adaptable and actually not as politically active as the main stream media or Biden Junta propagandized. I know a lot of Left Wing types that are never loud about it and never fly into a lecture or tirade about it. They're just as fed up with crime as the next Conservative because they've been victimized by it as well.

yea yall are some rebellion. illegal weed, illegal abortion, highest prison population. fuckin loser virgin incels

@@craftpaint1644 Leftists just don't care nearly as much about low-level street crime because they know what causes it. If you eliminate the criminals at the top making life difficult for everyone else, then you consequently eliminate most petty crime too. The number one motivating factor for crime is poverty and hopelessness. Economics. Fix those, and you fix crime.

rebellion against what?

@@marticus201 When you are starving without immediate food supplies, you get desperate and ticked off. Some folks can’t even go for a few hours without getting hangry; anger caused by hunger. ^_^

I hate to sound pessimistic like that, but it's true. What matters is we start off by recognizing this fact, and going from there, forward.

​@CaesarAnubis0858 I've already met one of those. Trust me, it's not pessimistic, it's quite realistic.

Do you know that one prison design where the prisoners don't know if they're being watched or not, that is basically the right-wings association bias they always feel "watched" by the feds or a better way to put it anything "too based" for a lack of a better word seems like fed bait, so it is a sad predicament we are in but hopefully in the future less people will be like this and move past the everyone's a fed but me mindset

I don't think that will happen. I am leaving for Italy​@@recruit-legionary

The problem is the Feds literally not only exist, but do have their arms everywhere. This is further compounded by the fact that not all forms of 'conservatism' are equal, and many are as bad and worse than leftism/marxism. We all know if we personally are Feds... To pretend that recognizing that Feds exist and are a problem that MUST be solved is a problem helps noone. Denying the truth because you wish it wasnt true isnt a solution to anything. The Feds ARE a real problem. They DO infiltrate most places and groups(especially ANYTHING gaining traction) Until THAT reality IS DEALT WITH, there is LITERALLY >>>NO HOPE

Yup, that’s why Taiwan was conquered by the PRC.

​@@Cloud30000 the war hasn't started yet, fool

yall dont leave anyone alone. if you did we wouldnt care to defeat you

​@@Cloud30000...give it time...

Not always. If you pester people with an advantage like an idiot, you can simply make it easier toget rid of you. They dont have to chase you down. After all, the whole point of look week when strong and strong when week is so armies dont play chase across the continent through all seasons. Good luck getting wins while veryone diesnt wager to win and takes eons.

Hope or Cope

Thirty Years' War : 😶😶😶😶😶😶

@@uberjoe-08 that was centuries ago on a completely different continent. That’s like saying WW2 is evidence that Germans and Frenchmen physically cannot work together despite them both being in NATO & the EU.

@@uberjoe-08times have changed and I think that many Protestants now don’t care and would much rather fight with Catholics than turn a blind eye to left wing secularism

@@uberjoe-08 The Thirty Years War was in the 17th century, this is the 21st century, you people are out of touch with reality, modern Americans do not care about denominations, especially to the point that it would in any way divide them, touch grass.

This implies there is one that people will follow. Military is specifically secular on politics unlike pre civil war Spain

Trump's more likely to be our Primo De Rivera

​@@joee7809Pre-civil war spain also saw soldiers stationed at one unit their whole career, creating bonds of loyalty with their commanding officers over the state. Now, they move soldiers around every 1-2 years, preventing loyalty to their leaders.

Excellent point.

I disagree. The Ku Klux Klan was basically right wing violence on steroids.

​@@MonsieurDeanA better explanation is that the Left come from dysfunctional homes and relationships and is ridgid in their ideology because of their victim mindset. The Right takes care of their jobs and businesses because it protects their families and or independence. Therefore the Right is used to protecting their livelihood through adaptability and the Left do not adapt but demand obedience to their ridgid dogma. Look at the Palestinian protestors, zero compromise, all the same tune, no adaptation, zero headway against police even though a lot of them are women and minorities. They haven't changed the Biden Junta's foreign policy

The right does have a history of political violence no matter how far you go back. What are you talking about and what? What are you smoking? If we go back to 60s the right organized, political violence against a lot of protesters. I’m not saying that the left isn’t war like. I’m just saying the right and the left have a history of political violence.

@@MonsieurDeandude you’ve been running this point into the ground for months, please make videos about anything else

it was btw like tens of thousands of years ago

Arabs will make it dry again

That’s a good question. What would a green party revolution look like in Arabia?

No Islam

This is a better topic for Alternate History Hub

Ceding ground though...

yes i think mr Z is wrong in a lot of this analysis

Yeah nah as another New Jersey (social) conservative, I'm probably going to stay here as I'm not going to abandon my family and friends just to fight with people that will probably see me as a canon fodder due to my ethnicity.

Moving to regions that are less developed, less industrial capacity, and less opportunities. This flight has spirred growth and development in the south but ultimately, as the south urbanizes and catches up to competing levels of the north east or west coast, it's liberalizing as well. Industries and corporations that are not quite willing to give up access to liberal markets domestically or the international markets globally, whose access is often dictated by likely liberal ports.

Than move to a swing state like Virginia.

Spot on. It doesn't matter if Trump gets back in the White House or not. Who is his team in congress? Who is he working WITH? If I could give one piece of advice to conservatives, stop paying attention to who want your president to be and more to your local officials and congressional representative. I just moved to Indiana, and my representatives here are TERRIBLE. Only one endorsement for my US rep (from a foreign PAC, go figure) and has a history of selling out the border for borders halfway around the world. No significant primary challenge, no statewide attention paid to this race. He is literally one of the smartest people though- sit in DC on the backbench and collect a paycheck that's not a bad amount of money, not to mention kickbacks from AIPAC, probably. The other ones are democrats with a fake blue dog image at the state level. It's your quintessential "moderate" area. However, back to what I was saying- we need to get rid of lazy backbenchers first like my representative. The Rudy Yakyms of the world are far worse than the Nancy Maces. Now, I have a mixed opinion on Mace- she's good at libertarian issues but not conservative ones. But at least she has energy and a voice. Rudy Yakym? Have any of you heard of him? Exactly. A useless backbencher backed by AIPAC. No leadership either. What has he done for his constituency? I certainly wouldn't know. But then you go on the street and we are more obsessed about Trump and Biden. (Facepalm) We need people of ACTION and ENERGY to form a good team. And the right has too many selfish, lazy backbenchers who are too obsessed with enriching themselves and playing at statecraft than doing the hard work of governance. They are in a way a representation of the broken right, and yes, that's what I call it now, the "broken right," which is a larger reflection of the conservative voting base in this country.

what is the goal?

It’s quite unfortunate really. The problem might be ironically what the right has collectively seemed to have turned on the neocons for (which tbf, was fair, as they seemed to go against what the right wing voters wanted as a matter of policy in and of itself, rather than a matter of practicality) and might potentially be an in-gross part of conservatism in the general gebersl which is to say, yo be willing to compromise of some things and not have happen some things that you personally highly value at your core. Conservatism in general is characterized by not wanting to budge on some level or another, but if that all is indeed to case, how truly can conservatives broadly unite effectively enough and long term enough against the left which at this point, has by comparison become something that can become ideologically amorphous as needed?

Rent is also a huge factor.

Im gonna go with If Trump wins and becomes Pres ,the Violence will definitely come from the Left. They are alot more comfortable with political violence than we are

Nah; we can still vote for him. If we vote for him, he wins and they won’t let him take power then we will have a problem.

@@John-uy4jx he wont win. the election will result in how it was planned to happen. so start planning for a JB victory now because that is who was chosen.

@@John-uy4jx nothing is going to ever happen until the food stops flowing, the toilets stop flushing, and the lights turn off and don't turn back on.

If something were to happen to Trump while in prison, even if actually an accident, no one will give the government the benefit of the doubt.

He should do that and what if Russia or Romania joined the central powers.

A Japanese Pacific States who doesn't have to deal with nazis like in man in high castle but will have to deal with the USA later down the line

@@taffingtonboathouse5754 Or a conflict similar to the French and Indian War between Russia and China/Japan and Spain, as the Spanish claimed a lot of the Americas.

Japanese East Coast would go hard

@@thebateman761 East-Asians would've colonize the Pacific Coast while Europeans in the Atlantic Coast. But each side has its own nation. With Japan and England in what's now USA. Korea and Spain in Latin America. And China and France in Canada. But how'd history have played out if that was the case? What would've changed about our everyday lives including pop-culture?

I don't know. There seems to be a divide between traditional conservatives, MAGA, and Establishment Hawks/Never Trumpers.

NB4 anyone says this is anecdotal to just my neighborhood, I have lived all over the US from California to Colorado to Carolina, never in my life have I ever so much as heard a whisper of anyone under a hundred caring about the difference between Protestants and Catholics, this is not a real problem.

You’re correct. My “group” who train together is full of Protestants and Catholics working alongside each other

agreed. this video is off in many places

fellow hispanic white neighborhood liver, what kinda churches y’all got?? bc the first thing most of the ppl here think of catholic nd christian as too separate things which jus so happen to be basically the same, there’s a lot of divide in small shit like this didn’t know there wasn’t an alternative to it

He doesn't, he criticizes those that want war since have unrealistic expectations about how a Civil War would be conducted and keep just want to ignore casualties to justify their "idealistic" approach to the war.

@@logical582 I dunno man. If that was the case, he would do it once. But he continually keeps doing it so I think there is something going on there deep in his soul.

​@@Ksim3000 if I had to assume it's because a lot of the figureheads, mainly Neocons and Libertarians, keep talking about it to this day (I am most likely very wrong on this assumption though)

My interpretation is that he’s tired of larpers wanting to start a civil war over nonissues and is giving them the business.

@@dawgwiddaglasses not being able to have a family is not a non-issue

Republicans aren’t really that divided. They are very united right now.

@@GenericKZfaqGuy We MAGA and Traditional conservatives aren’t fans of Neocon Hawk RINOS. Brandon Herrera tried to knock one (Gonzales) out of the House and came within a couple hundred votes.

@@GenericKZfaqGuydude they are halfway through an internal party revolution between the old neocons and populists.

@@crusader2112 there’s no way regular republicans vote for RINOS, there HAS to be something to it, like a couple thousand democrats sneaking in.

@@GenericKZfaqGuy Yeah. Probably.

Funny, I was thinking this as well.

Why did you switch sides?

@@diredm3889 gained a sense of competence and the belief that I could influence my own life trajectory. Also spent more time working and realized what it actually takes to do things, and not just tear them down. then I realized that dominace hierarchies are a part of nature, and that we are ultimately similar to animals in many ways. I was always a skeptical of people using ideology as a cope. Even as a leftist I saw the trans movement and the more woke types as an extension of that. But my outlook definitely grew more internally focused when I became right wing.

@@JackSophir A lot of what your saying here explans parts of why you don't like some factors of the left But what political policys do the right offer? Do you agree with abortion bans? Or is the Border that you want to protect?

@@JackSophir To me you don't sound like you became right wing, rather it sounds like you've been left behind by your ex-comrades who went further and further left.

The border is like the one thing these conservative factions can agree on so I don’t think that’s the best example

On the state level, yes. But on an individual level conservatives simply do not have the drive. If any rebellion was to occur, it would be a singular large red state governor picking the crown from the gutter and the rest of the red states WILL have to follow or be a punching bag for liberal redistributive/punitive policy.

Tbf Idaho only sent like 12 deputies to the border… so willing to get involved, but not that much

drawing the line of the protestant/deep south at the border of Louisianan and TX made me laugh. Everything east of Austin is deep bible belt territory. He's never been behind the piney curtain and it shows.

I have said this multiple times but it is frustrating to keep hearing right wing media whine about "Communism" despite the fact if we actually had a Mao Zedong the right would accidentally win more than the left (ie. foreigners out, drugs banned, and young college educated liberals sent to the countryside pick potatoes)

It's honestly 50/50 on seizing power, Germany, Italy, Spain, Arab spring, Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, and more were all conservative take overs. Pretty much any military coup is gonna be conservative.

the right knows very well about leftists. They take their orders from (((bolsheviks)))

Huge issue with that one my freind. Many of the biggist City's in Right Wing states are Left Wing. So unless you want to be a state with out cities I think your out of luck

Just because a civil war might not lead to a victory and we ain't voting our way out, doesn't mean hope is lost. We must never give into despair. Go out into your communities, make friends and connections, etc.

@crusader2112 Not "just because a war won't achieve the desired effect", but because we have no recourse for an increasingly malignant elite and plummeting social trust and cohesion.

the celtic people lost, but some still lived on. the romans lost, but some still lived on.

@@kitkat47chrysalis95The objective here isn’t to “have some of us live on”. It’s to save the Nation from disastrous left wing policies

@@skinsornothink1913 quiet the contrary, the objective is in fact to have as many of us live on as possible. unfortunately that number will be very few.

Rightism will never be a united block. Rightism focus too much on conserving culture and ideals that will sooner or later conflict with each other or even just out right contradict. Leftism is far more economically driven and usually is about recognizing the differences and also establishing better working conditions and living standards for the people of different backgrounds. Whether you agree it is actually bettering the living standard

Or maybe we should figure out a way to all work together again instead of all the “get off my lawn” BS?

Nothing brings someone together like a good sparring match so to me in fighting is a non-issue amongst the right or left especially when you have a greater issue at hand, most right-wingers just want to grill and chill not fight a war political or physical

I think that aspect of it is important because what comes next? Beyond the culture what shape is a country going to take. Liberal Economic policies are drowning us and cultural Marxism has destroyed social cohesion. Until we realize that then we’ll be fighting hydra for a long time

Honestly I disagree in part. Factions of realitively similar alignment should unite but the right and left are far too diverse for that. Maybe sections of it but never the entire collective outside of party politics which tbh only includes establishment dogs. Like I could see unity among moderates/libertarians but never unity between them and nationalists/populists or the economic right/ pro war faction

Imagine thinking you need gay people to win a war 😂

Hey my 3 issues are immigration, trade and diplomacy. If you support policies that preserve American heritage, protect our jobs from being shipped overseas and support AF foreign policy, I'll put up with the rest of your demands.

90% of Conservatives: afraid of losing their jobs and homes, and afraid of being called racist. In any case, it's demographically over for the Right, which is overwhelmingly White. There's no way the Right can win, even if they found the will.

Right wingers are divided because modern conservatism is not really a coherent ideology like left-liberalism, or marxism, or even fa$ism. It is a loose coalition of obsolete institutions, world views, and grifts, desperately using the remnants of their power to hang on as the world around them changes.

That gay pretension is always going to be an issue. At best of things get bad enough you're be tolerated but end of the day homosexuality is a problem. You'll see how "based" people get when tolerating alternatives to the nuclear family unit equals genocide of their race and culture.

I agree. But the left will never leave us alone and neither will the powers that be.

I kinda want to annex New Jersey and Connecticut 👀

​@@MonsieurDeanBased, long live the Bigger Apple

May the most powerful state win. ;)

@@MonsieurDean I’ll watch from the unrecognized Liberty State. ;)

Yeah I’m pretty I had already watched this and his last video

Mano tu tomou muita droga.

Then why haven't you done anything during COVID tough guy?

I don't think Monsieur Z wants a civil war and neither do I. It's not gonna be like anything we imagine. It won't be like the last one and it most certainly won't be the Left/Democrats vs the Right/Republicans. It will be a chaotic fractured mess of different groups carrying out attacks against one another with civilians just trying to survive and the establishment of both parties will no doubt collaborate in order to reestablish their power over the nation.

@@PeruvianPotato Because I wasn't 18 þen.

​@@StarsBarsAndCheese Neither was Kyle Rittenhouse.

​@@johnathonhazen798hardest comment I've seen. 👑 Enjoy your crown king

Nah I think he's just really defeatist and black pilled

This video is exactly the opposite of the video a Fed would make. A Fed wants you to sign up for criminal activity so they can either arrest you or your friends, or at the very least keep you monitored. The problem is that we are delusional and think that we're some kind of Rambo tough guys who can take over the US government with your guns and that is what they WANT us to think. The Fed doesn't want us to stay quiet and be demoralized. They want to know who we are so they can entrap us and our associates. Please name 1 Fed operation where their goal was to convince people to feel defeated and NOT commit crimes? The actual Feds always play to the power fantasies of people who think that marching into a building on an election day would be the result of the election, that's why they chose people like Ray Epps. Who had been calling for a gun toting insurrection for years. Also Mr. Z is not "black-pilled". He doesn't believe that there is nothing we can do, he doesn't doesn't believe that any of the current things that we have been doing.. ie; marching with torches, forming right-wing militia groups, and hunkering down in the woods with cans of beans and ammo are going to work. His point, is that we would need to do what the left did, ie; a long match through the institutions, take over the institutions of finance, information, education, entertainment, culture, etc, etc... But that would require going into "wussy" professions and living at least part-time in big cities, and we are not willing to do that. We would rather be "forever self-employed" and make more money running a power-washing business where we can clean the steps of the elites that rule over us.

But unites us that we all support?

do something

@@marticus201 If þere is a protest near me, just watch.

You must be careful with hatred, it is a double edged sword and will cut both way. Unifying under Defense or Honor works better in the mind.

And the whites were United by hatred of the soviets; they still where too divided to win

Just run for office with the goal of improving one’s community. What we need is a revival of American patriotism and good governance.

@@Sebman1113 I don't think politics will help. The issue is that every policy we pass will just expand government power, and limit more of our freedoms. I think it will eventually flip to the right as the left's side is very anti-baby making.

Sure doesn't feel like anything we do helps.

@@Triaxx2 The left is doing a lot of things, and it is pushing people to the right. Sometimes less is more. It took a while for things to get bad, I don't expect the solution to be fixed by just voting.

Thank you, Libertarian Party 🎉

You should disagree on far more. Like how this dude actually thinks the right is more divided than the left or how he thinks there's a serious Christian divide in America these days.

@@graye2799 Very true! This guy claims to be a conservative but his talking points seem very similar to.. lets just say certain media outlets like CNN

@@MonsieurDean The right is not more divided than the left. I mean, you practically have mini-civil wars breaking out at the college campus protests among the pro-Palestine crowd, and Democrats cant even agree whether or not they should convict Trump

Why the south?

Nah, Dixie has a plan... You Yankees just ain't privy to it

What do you mean about the south?

@@RobotWithHumanHair. He's coping. The south does all the heavy lifting in every conflict for America

@@elliottbaker201 It is tragic when you think about it. The south sends their boys to die in the desert for the rest of America, but the only thing they get in return are insults and those same people their boys died at the hands at imported to their neighborhoods to spit on them.

Not going to happen we're completely boned for now

@@PatrickHunter-hz2og won't happen until victory is possible. For now we're in the demoralization phase.

well Shapiro takes orders from MOSAD. He explicitly stated his loyalty is to Israel first. We should be rooting these peoples out of conservative politics. (and American politics generally, and hopefully expel them from America entirely)

Honestly from my pov conservatism is a losing ideology. When smth is lost like truly lost it can not be conserved. And if the ideology can not react it cant reclaim its ground.

@@keltoislavi Conservatism is not an ideology like socialism, or liberalism, because it does not inherently proscribe solutions to problems. It is a way of life that appreciates the inherited wisdom and seeks to preserve and maintain the institutions that protect it. It therefore appeals to people who already have wealth and power, and seek not to rock the boat and risk losing all of that. The natural conservative thus is someone who has property and a stable income, is integrated with and well regarded by his community, and sees in himself a responsibility and an obligation to that community in turn. In the United States, people have been trained to identify as conservatives, even though they are by every measure the exact opposite. The libertarian aversion to community and community obligation, the populist aversion to hierarchical establishments, the neoliberal prioritization of maximum profit at the expense of societal stability, the neoconservative's universalist/idealistic push for spreading democracy. The reason the right is losing is indeed, because conservatives have defeated themselves, but not for the reasons you, Monsieur Z or many in this comment section think. Its because conservatism never actually existed in the United States, except as the name plastered on an alliance of convenience on the part of ideological factions whose aims directly undermine societal cohesion, the family and religious affiliation. How can you maintain control of societal institutions, when a significant faction in your own movement wants to dismantle them and would instantly claim you are corrupted the minute you succeeded in taking them back? How can you build a nation of strong families built around religious adherence, when the constant press by the economic mantra is "move to find work" (as my parents were misled into doing) and "shareholders must come first, even if it outsources the economic foundation of that small town in rural Pennsylvania (not unlike the one I was born in). America's own traditions have in some cases been in its own undoing and the narratives on the right either amplify or misdirect people, worsening the underlying problem. America does not need a violent revolution, its needs a nationalist political revolution that shifts attention back towards the internal stability of the country. This would necessarily mean that libertarians and neoliberals are left screaming traitor and accusing you of violating founding principles, even though half of the founders were nationalists. We got "conservatives" who suck Jefferson's dick with abandon, even though he was the epitome of universalism and idealism, and the father of secular liberalism. The real political divide that defined early American politics was not slavery versus anti-slavery (not until 1850 anyway) as so many of today's liberal revisionists would claim. It was idealistic liberalism, versus realist nationalists. The former group believed that the best way to protect Independence was to make the country as liberal and free as possible. The latter group saw this as societal suicide and unilateral disarmament in the face of a dangerous and hostile world (which one sounds more conservative? Even Monsieur Z tied conservatism to the threat of barbarity on the fringes of civilization). Virtually all of those nationalists are vilified on the right today and even labeled as globalists, displaying a horrifying level of ignorance brought on by a liberal skewed curriculum answered in turn by a wave of right-wing misinformation on the internet. I strongly suggest reading Henry C. Carey's "The Way To Outdo England without Fighting Her". The real globalists in the Civil War period, were the planter elite and thus the Confederacy. Yet people in this very comment section are citing 1861 as an example to be replicated. Right because what we certainly need is a section of the country to secede in the name of maintaining profits via a submissive trade relationship to a foreign superpower (Britain).The equivalent today would be California seceding to maintain a trade relationship with China in reaction to Trump tariffs. I don't actually see much legitimate desire on the right to restore societal stability, regain control of institutions, rebuild faith centered communities and actually put American interests firsts. I see lip service paid to these concepts in general terms, some token measures embraced, but beyond that its all hollow marketing and grift by con artistry. If Trump wins, my advice is don't expect much to change, but do expect yet another fundraising email every time someone hurts his precious feelings.

That's why many people talk about a reactionary ideology

@@David-fm6gowell damn. Amazing comments. Excellent explanation on how there’s never really been conservatism in America I’ve never really thought of it like that.

Holy shit you are actively holding all of my beliefs. I'm even from Virginia.

@Stars.-Bars.-n-Cheese I think I'd like to call my philosophy "Political Eclecticism." You wouldn't happen to also be from the western part of the state and part Italian or Cajun would you?

@@tau-5794 Bro I'm Italian-Austrian and from Norþ-Western Virginia.

I'm a Catholic Distributist/Localist in Pennsylvania and I'd think we get along well. 👍

I'm a Catholic Distributist/Localist in Pennsylvania and I'd think we get along well. 👍

Yes, one of the points of the series is that the side that rebels against the government is quite likely the one that loses and the one the turns out on the government's side wouldn't even need to fight as the status quo would do it, a bunch of urban liberals and communists from Cascadia would have an even worst performance than a right wing rebellion but both are likely to lose.

In the short run it might be warlordism, but eventually it will devolve into a few major parties (ie. Chinese civil war)

This is a re upload because he thinks everyone is super pissed about the Trump trial. Preachy and bitchy

Monsieur Z simply won't blindly follow the right and support them. He'll criticize them when the need arises.

​@@crusader2112 exactly 💯 We need to hear criticism to stay in check with reality instead of letting our egos, inflated by the propaganda from the Zionist Establishment saying that we win a war automatically, get the better of us.

@@crusader2112 Which is fine, just as a more centralist person myself I would personally like to see videos like this balanced out with videos on problems with the left. Neither side is perfect and they both need to be criticized because they stay in power by polarizing us.

Is a Drill Instructor "anti-Marine Corps" when he corrects his recruits?

@@sullathehutt7720 as long as he corrects them all equally then no.

Blackpilling is one of those words, people who understand the words meaning don't use it often and don't correct those that misuse it. This is quite possibly the least blackpilling video possible it is essentially calling all of you *nationalists* who bicker over the dumbest shit. Whether it's covid vaccine shit or religion. Instead of thrusting our spears at our enemies we are gouging out our own eyes over splinters. So instead of misusing *blackpilling* can you understand this for what it is. A wake-up call to not be absolutely Gremlins over petty useless ideas. Things that we can sort out when we are taken off the back foot.

Based profile picture

And a even more based name

Watch out. MAGAtards are gonna be calling you "Fed"...

To me unification is not the issue it is the will to fight not the means not the how it's the will because a "sad" thing is most right-wingers just want to grill and chill and not fight a war physically or politically

@@recruit-legionary true but soon they will realize we have no choice

@@recruit-legionary grillin and chillin in states with the highest nonviolent prison populations. yea right you dont care about being left alone

him and whatifalthist need to spend 6 months to 1 year completly offline.

I mean as someone who does there best to not be terminally online he is correct on this issue

He did. Gotta get those views.

And you don't see that goal as being achieved more appropriately if the nationalist converge on a single idea instead of these 1000's of little shindigs

@@kalebouimet7140 they need to have a young, charismatic leader who will fight alongside them to rally around. Emphasis on young.

that wont happen, the left have a lot of manpower

This is the exact stupid shit he is denouncing why instead of planning the civil war with your nods and 1500$ AR build you instead spend time increasing the quality of people in your community I don't know how people fall so far off the mark but I guess you can bring a horse to water

I guess, from this video, talk ad infinitum about "abstract concepts" and do nothing but vote.

start working with the Chinese and Russians. I mean the libs pretty much are in kahoots with the EU and Five Eyes anyways.

This is a rallying call to get organized and get strategic. It isn’t over, we just have to get our crap in order.

Conservatives are obviously evil

We'll see.

Depends on your definition of win because if a civil war does break out I honestly don't think there will be a winner more just one loses slower than the other

@@recruit-legionary Whoever the Chinese choose to back will gain the biggest wins.

@@CantoniaCustoms both or neither in the sense that they would want us stuck in a permanent or at least extended stalemate racking up debt on both sides that the "winner" will have to pay up on

That cuts both ways. The left is doing all this but it’s actually happening but your blaming us who have no institutional control. Calling BS on this.

The Cult are trying to force us to be like them, collapsing our civilization and criminalizing the opposition.

If you're not willing to actually conserve your ideals, then you're not a conservative.

The Left is forcing everyone to be like them, collapsing our civilization and criminalizing the opposition.

Hail.

The federalists are responsible for the end result that this tyrannical government monstrosity has grown into. Their thesis was wrong from the start. Jefferson , Henry, and Adams were right.

I've been wanting to ask a random leftist a question that's been bothering me for a long time... What are you leftists going to do with the incel problem if you win the civil war? It's clear with the rightists, they'll strictly subjugate women and, judging by everything, will bring back arranged marriages. And what will be the solution to this problem from you, leftists?

Whatifalthist is so spot on what are you talking about???

🫡

What kind of leftist? The gay kind or the Stalinist kind.

​@@joeywheelerii9136 I would imagine the stalinist, maoist or leninist kind perhaps, because hardcore libtards/shitlibs are as close minded as you can get.

I’ll get some to you.

​@@MonsieurDeanplease do

@@MonsieurDean Yes please lets outline a strategy that is beneficial to us. At least you've outlined why something is a losing strategy here. Let's focus on winning ones now. That said I think the right would win a Civil War IF the Left was the instigator and did so with Trump in office which in that case they'd be hard screwed because the military would be on our side. Really though I would note that controlling the population centers is a disadvantage for the left as well the Right controls the food supply and the left being prone to rioting would get peeved when starving.

You have to get the problems out of the way in order to talk about solutions.

I would much rather be in America than Canada. White replacement is happening at a faster rate in canada than america. plus the type of immigrate canada is receiving is worse. I would much rather be taking in hispanic immigrants than indians. at least hispanics are Christians and have European dna.

Correct. Reagan’s libertarianism poisoned the well in our party. The right is too selfish to unite and win. I’d probably prefer to move to Hungary and start a family there at this moment, but I’ll see.

It’s not that individualism is necessarily the problem, it’s just plain laziness and self serving (like most Americans left or right, though radicals will win out in this scenario). Individualism doesn’t purely mean self serving. In fact civic duty is an important trait to have according to some individualist based philosophers. People need to remember not to confuse civic duty with collectivism.

@@hughgpauwelsReagan wasn’t a Libertarian, Milton Friedman wasn’t ether. However I can see your point on how “Rugged individualism” may have caused some problems for the right.

@@Argonhubert that’s more what I was getting at. We need to look after our own a little bit more and to stop playing a cynical game against other families. We need communities of like minded families to fight back against the regime.

@@Argonhubert and look after our kids so they don’t get their minds screwed up by the system. It takes a village, not just a collection of individuals. “A disorderly mob is no more an army than a heap of building materials is a house”- Socrates

Did you miss the rant at the end? Have you met the brothers in Christ? They will call you a heretic for simply saying that they're quoting the Bible wrong

I don't even think it will be between left vs right. All political factions would fracture like there's no tomorrow. Some would ally with each other, but we won't be seeing left vs right or Republican vs Democrat. Most likely the Establishment of both parties will ally with each other.

@@soloknight7197 And? Who cares about some obscure group no one has ever heard of, no normal person in modern America cares about which denomination of Christian you are, people usually don't even say it anymore and just say Christian. The idea that modern Christians are divided by denomination in the US is silly

Bruh I saw many protestants on youtube denouncing catholics as non-christian so I am not surpised if that was the case here.

Cons are literally losers tho.

"The Jews of the Brooklyn are not going to fight side by side with Muslims of Hamtramck, The young progressives will side with the Muslims, while the Older whites side with the Jews" Absolutely correct, right now the left is in a civil war because of the Palestine question lmao