Just a note. LOVE Savannah! They’ve got awesome energy.

@@GrumpyOldFart2 🤨...🤢...🤮...😐

Haha I just saw that too.

😅

You know if they were actually that size, there wouldn't be any life whatsoever?

@@crazyhorse2730 Don't get technical, Dahlin'.😄

@@crazyhorse2730 sounds like something Cunk would say. “Did you know that if the universe was an electron, we would be electron stuff?”

They could snack on the Australian wasp, Aha ha.

This is the type of science we need in the world!! lol

So what should they name the next one? M. mart? M. aturize?

True, but it didn't help that the shuttle was years late.

That’s the problem with private companies undertaking these “scientific expeditions”. Nothing scientific about it.

An 'information economy' requires scarcity to create value, thereby is definitionally built around the sequestering and underutilization of information. He says, trying to control the twitch in his eye. (Edit to add: this just adds to your point; separate but related issues.)

It's worse than that. Elon's satellites may destroy all other satellites in orbit. All it takes it one collision, the debris will spread out where it can hit other satellites, which will create more debris and destroy more satellites, all while pieces of broken satellites break eachother into more and more tiny pieces until there's just a low-density cloud of orbital velocity shrapnel surrounding the planet.

That's why a higher public skepticism may actually help Like the aviation industry, many safety knowledge can be withheld to one company to make their competitors less safe and riskier for the customers But because people don't treat safety on a per-company basis but industry-wide So airlines with good understanding will not compete in safety There are some concerns about the new tech-style start-ups about EVTOLs that do not understand this safety culture in aviation And we are observing that many critical safety discoveries are kept trade secrets to other competitors We need more public skepticism towards the whole industry to educate these companies that withholding critical information about safety will ultimately be worse for them

You must have magic eyes to see blinking lights in a still photo. Also, you seem to have some logic failure. So you believe that a satellite would not be moving across the sky relative to the photographer? How exactly to you think an orbit works? Maybe you're right and that is a plane. But the evidence you give isn't sensible. The lights aren't blinking, and a satellite can still move toward or away from your perspective. It just depends where you stand relative to the direction of its orbit.

@@simpleanswer8954 He is right. It's a plane, and his reasoning is perfect. You can clearly see the red light flashes and it even starts to make a turn (or came out of one), orbits don't do that. I'm an astrophotographer, and planes and satellites are easily differentiated.

@@bazpearce9993 I still think it's amazing how you see flashing lights in a still photo. I mean, there's clearly a mistake in the video caption calling it a long exposure when it's clearly multiple exposures... but that's different. You're so worried about that red light, I have to ask: then where's the green light? And since my original point was more about the quality of evidence: you have ignored and failed to address the whole concept of "Moving away from or toward". An orbit can and will make a satellite move away or toward your perspective. So the reasoning is absolutely not perfect. What, do you both think that satellites move straight up instead of around the Earth? If it's moving around the Earth, than it will ALWAYS be moving toward and away from something else on the ground. Both of you have failed to grasp the basic logic here. Maybe you're just ignoring that because you want to agree, but you're just flat wrong about the quality of the reasoning. Also, don't forget: Where's that green light that an airplane would absolutely have?

@@simpleanswer8954 The green light is out of view. Planes are NOT transparent. You're so sure you know what you're talking about aren't you? A solid line of main lights with one side showing the red flash, indicates a single long exposure. I DO know what i'm talking about. I am an astrophotgrapher, and i see this all the time in my images. I also spend time out in the countryside watching for sats and meteors on a weekly basis, and i've been doing it for nigh on 25 years.

@@simpleanswer8954 "Flashing lights on a still photo"... It's a long exposure. If you flash a light at a steady rate while moving in a long exposure, you'll get dots in a line, exactly like you see in this photo. I've done many long exposures of the night sky, and that's definitely a plane with flashing navigation lights.

Yeah but that is also where things went wrong

Growing up, the only person I ever wanted to be like was him.

That was probably intentional naming by the company founder.

Hello, God bless you! Please make sure you know Jesus Christ as your Lord and Saviour! He is coming soon! Please don't be left behind! Accept and believe in Jesus Christ! John 3:16, Revelation 20:15

Lol

Surface area only counts when there is a physical medium of exchange. Increased surface area of an aluminum heatsink with air lets you exchange more heat with the air. Increased surface area of the air with… empty space… doesn’t do much. You have to find a way to increase the heat that radiates as infrared light as opposed to simply exciting neighboring molecules.

@@emmettturner9452 Bahahaha, go back to school. All matter is physical. Read what I actually wrote, my words are very specific.

@@DanielSMatthews SPACE is the absence of matter.

@@emmettturner9452 Obviously the only way that the Earth can lose heat is through radiation. More surface area allows more radiation. It may or may not be a linear relationship but those are the facts, are they not?

sun cycle is 11 years.

Gotta love when someone says something they think is a compliment, but then it turns out to be an unintentional insult. Way to go. By complimenting someone for not choosing hosts based on their looks, you're forced to insult the host's appearance. Should have just left that part out.

It’s 38 satellites. That’s less than one launch…

@@firstduckofwellington6889 they are on major copium since twitter buy out

@@blackwidowrsa That guy is right: there are currently thousand of functioning Starlink satellites in orbit. 38 of of thousand isn't really a big number.

@@remliqa i know he's right, the elon hate train started just when he got twitter

@@blackwidowrsaAs a former Elon Musk fanboy, I started to hate him years before he even hinted of buying Twitter.

Elon vs Reality We all know he's a moron, but Wall Street and Washington are also morons and gave him an insane finical foothold

Low final altitude. These hadn't been boosted to final altitude yet.

++

no, since the signal would be traveling at the speed of light, thus making it practically instant. it's instead to make it easier to communicate with the satteliter and actually transfer data with them because the further they are, the more energy you need to send a signal of the same strength.

@@mihael64 "traveling at the speed of light" Are you saying that they use optical signals?

@@Radicus radio is also light waves but very low frequency, so they are actually communicating using light waves, just not visible ones

@@Radicus No, they're literally using light in the form of radio waves (which are light btw) and radio waves travel at the speed of light.

An unsprung weight is a weight not buffered by a spring -a shock absorber. These weights are prone to being knocked about -damaged or causing sudden movements that can make a vehicle lurch. They reduce durability and driving comfort.

I think people just keyword search “satellite” so that they can be whacky no matter the occasion

Idk but it’s doing well

Hello, God bless you! Please make sure you know Jesus Christ as your Lord and Saviour! He is coming soon! Please don't be left behind! Accept and believe in Jesus Christ! John 3:16, Revelation 20:15

@@mariebarker4499 Union Pacific 844, also known as the "Living Legend", is a class "FEF-3" 4-8-4 "Northern" type steam locomotive owned and operated by the Union Pacific Railroad for its heritage fleet. Built in December 1944 by the American Locomotive Company (ALCO) of Schenectady, New York, No. 844 is one of four surviving FEF Series locomotives and the only one in operation. The locomotive operated in revenue service until 1959. It was stored while awaiting scrapping, along with the rest of the UP steam locomotive fleet. In 1960, railroad leaders recognized the benefits of having a steam program and retained No. 844 for special activities, the kernel of what has become the Union Pacific's heritage fleet. Today, it is one of UP's oldest serving locomotives and the only steam locomotive owned by a North American Class I railroad that has never been retired. In 1944, Union Pacific and the American Locomotive Company (ALCO) collaborated on the FEF-3, a class of 10 locomotives designed to pull passenger trains at 90 mph. The FEF-3 could reach and regularly run at 120 mph; one locomotive reportedly pulled a 1,000-ton passenger train at 100 mph. All FEF classes were considered by the Union Pacific to be capable of producing between 4,000 and 5,000 drawbar horsepower. The FEF-3 class represented the apex of dual-service steam locomotive development; funds and research were being concentrated into the development of diesel-electric locomotives. Originally designed to burn coal, they were converted to run on fuel oil in 1946. Like the earlier FEF-1 and FEF-2 classes, the FEF-3 locomotives were ultimately reassigned to freight service. UP 844 was the last steam locomotive delivered to the Union Pacific Railroad, constructed as a member of the FEF-3 class of 4-8-4 "Northern" type locomotives. Upon its entry into service, the locomotive spent most of its career pulling a variety of passenger trains, such as the Overland Limited, Los Angeles Limited, Portland Rose and Challenger. From 1957 to 1959, UP 844 was reassigned to fast freight service in Nebraska when diesel-electric locomotives took over passenger service. After commercial steam operations ended in 1959, the 844 and the rest of the FEF-3 class was placed into storage. Saved from scrapping in 1960, No. 844 was chosen for rebuilding and is now used on company and public excursion trains, along with hauling revenue freight trains during ferry moves. Since 1960, No. 844 has run hundreds of thousands of miles as Union Pacific's publicity locomotive. The locomotive often pulled the annual Denver Post-sponsored Cheyenne Frontier Days train that ran round-trip from Cheyenne to Denver every July before it was discontinued in early 2019.

We?

@@mariebarker4499 1 Timothy 2:12: But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.[

But Alex man you're comment is so far behind, the count is up to like 4 or 5 balloons already lol

Nah. It's Trump's fault. No, wait. It's Putin!

Man, i remember a few years ago when Elon Musk was being paraded around by the left for being the savior of the world when he started tesla, but as soon as he expresses some of his opinions, that all goes out the window 😂😂😂, get your priorities in order!

fascist trash is fascist trash when their opinions are made clear, priorities continue to remain in order

@@jesserutt7413 I don't know what leftists you've been talking to, but Mr. Musk has never been very popular with the left. First and foremost, he's a sleazy billionaire with a dubious history. But electric vehicles don't solve a lot of the bigger issues with urbanization that better city planning, resource distribution, and rail systems could solve. EVs are a crutch -- we'd get better results by limiting how much people need cars in the first place.

@@jesserutt7413 started SpaceX. He didn't start tesla. He bought tesla & paid the founder extra to not object to him naming himself the founder.

"Subtitles: English (Automatically Generated)."

@@AssistantCoreAQI That's a shame as I feel a business like yours should consider proper accessibility by investing in proper closed captions (auto generated is better than nothing but it's hard to follow as it's just a list of words, rather than with grammar that makes it make sense). I know you have a transcript, but not everyone who uses subtitles/CC are completely deaf (and having a transcript means most of the work is done, you just have to put it to the times on the video). As well as hearing impaired, there are people with sensory issues who need low volume, people with ADHD who find subtitles helping them follow the video, and people for whom English isn't their first language (especially considering how fast you talk in this video especially).

@@anyawillowfan I'm Not A Member Of SciShow, I Was Just Pointing It Out.

@@AssistantCoreAQI Apologies, that was unclear. No need to shout at me though.

@@anyawillowfan Sorry.