Why did the US join WWI?

  Рет қаралды 224,800

The Cynical Historian

The Cynical Historian

Күн бұрын

It’s been around a century since the US declared war on Germany in 1917, but why did we join WWI? It might seem like a straightforward thing to answer, but trying to do so leads us straight down a rabbit hole to the foundation of the modern conspiracy theory movement.
------------------------------------------------------------
references:
Report of the Special Committee on Investigation of the Munitions Industry (US Congress, Senate, 1936), 3-13. www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel...
Kathryn Olmsted, Real Enemies: Conspiracy Theories and American Democracy, World War I to 9/11 (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2009), 13-45. amzn.to/2unDgjI
Smedley Butler, War is a Racket (New York: Round Table Press, 1935). amzn.to/2upIriM
Alan Axelrod, Little-Known Wars of Great and Lasting Impact: The Turning Points in Our History We Should Know More About (Beverly, Mass.: Fair Winds Press, 2009), 204-219. amzn.to/2JqC9nG
Alan Axelrod, America’s Wars (New York: Wiley and Sons, 2002), 368-383. amzn.to/2NHcLOa
Max Boot, The Savage Wars of Peace: Small Wars and the Rise of American Power (New York: Perseus Books Group, 2002), 129-181. amzn.to/2NTVKjQ
------------------------------------------------------------
SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE VIDEOS:
kzfaq.info_c...
contribute to my Patreon:
/ cynicalhistorian
LET'S CONNECT:
/ cynicalcypher88
/ cynical_history
------------------------------------------------------------
Wiki:
The American entry into World War I came in April 1917, after more than two and a half years of efforts by President Woodrow Wilson to keep the United States out of the war. Apart from an Anglophile element urging early support for the British, American public opinion reflected that of the president: the sentiment for neutrality was particularly strong among Irish Americans, German Americans and Scandinavian Americans, as well as among church leaders and among women in general. On the other hand, even before World War I had broken out, American opinion had been more negative toward Germany than towards any other country in Europe.[2] Over time, especially after reports of atrocities in Belgium in 1914 and following the sinking of the passenger liner RMS Lusitania in 1915, the American people increasingly came to see Germany as the aggressor in Europe.
As U.S. President, it was Wilson who made the key policy decisions over foreign affairs: while the country was at peace, the domestic economy ran on a laissez-faire basis, with American banks making huge loans to Britain and France - funds that were in large part used to buy munitions, raw materials and food from across the Atlantic. Until 1917, Wilson made minimal preparations for a land war and kept the United States Army on a small peacetime footing, despite increasing demands for enhanced preparedness. He did however expand the United States Navy.
In 1917, with Russia experiencing political upheaval following widespread disillusionment there over the war, and with Britain and France low on credit, Germany appeared to have the upper hand in Europe, while her Ottoman ally clung stubbornly to her possessions in the Middle East. In the same year, Germany decided to resume unrestricted submarine warfare against any vessel approaching British waters; this attempt to starve Britain into surrender was balanced against the knowledge that it would almost certainly bring the United States into the war. Germany also made a secret offer to help Mexico regain territories lost in the Mexican-American War in an encoded telegram known as the Zimmermann Telegram, which was intercepted by British Intelligence. Publication of that communique outraged Americans just as German U-boats started sinking American merchant ships in the North Atlantic. Wilson then asked Congress for "a war to end all wars" that would "make the world safe for democracy", and Congress voted to declare war on Germany on April 6, 1917.
------------------------------------------------------------
Hashtags: #History #WWI #ZimmermanTelegram #WoodrowWilson #Lusitania

Пікірлер: 688
@minifridge337
@minifridge337 5 жыл бұрын
Russia: “Guys, guys... I have a plan” *teamkills and leaves the game*
@willywitchdoctor
@willywitchdoctor 5 жыл бұрын
This made me fucking cackle. Thank you
@nikkiisntdum257
@nikkiisntdum257 5 жыл бұрын
Minifridge ded
@luckyday465768
@luckyday465768 5 жыл бұрын
I think it should've been "comrads, comrads… I have plan"
@isaacschmitt4803
@isaacschmitt4803 4 жыл бұрын
I might quote this in a research paper. . .
@jonpeterson1479
@jonpeterson1479 4 жыл бұрын
lol.
@mikeldoomsday2175
@mikeldoomsday2175 4 жыл бұрын
“Did the US enter WW1 because of a conspiracy? The actions of a bumbling president? Or gradual tensions with Germany?”..... ...yes.
@finitewehosh6542
@finitewehosh6542 7 жыл бұрын
Understanding U.S history really makes our current foreign policies much clearer.
@Walker-ow7vj
@Walker-ow7vj 4 жыл бұрын
drmodestoesq yeah Iran is barely a democracy 😂
@RemixedVoice
@RemixedVoice 4 жыл бұрын
@@Walker-ow7vj USA ruined Iran
@BeukendaalMason
@BeukendaalMason 4 жыл бұрын
@@RemixedVoice Iran ruined Iran
@joselugo2514
@joselugo2514 4 жыл бұрын
@@RemixedVoice Iran ruined Irán, the U.S only wanted a way to profit from Iran and containing communism.
@boofmcgoof1534
@boofmcgoof1534 4 жыл бұрын
Think locally F*ck globally
@herrgoldmann2562
@herrgoldmann2562 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for mentioning that the "Lusitania" was full of weapons for Britain and not only a passengership. To this day most english speaking historians simply do not mention it and repeat the WW I propaganda of the bad Germans attacking a peaceful ship....
@observationsfromthebunker9639
@observationsfromthebunker9639 2 жыл бұрын
The Lusitania was a sucker bait, though, and the Germans rose to the baited hook. Let the liner pass, and the Brits get needed war materials. Sink the liner, and get damned in the world press as baby killers, and get the USA's back up. Choose and lose, and the unrestricted U-boat policy was chosen. The USA came close to entering the war on the side of the Triple Entente in 1915, and President Wilson's administration became pro-Allied and anti-Central Powers in outlook. In clear retrospect, the Lusitania should've been left alone.
@haldir3120
@haldir3120 2 жыл бұрын
@Mateo Hodge You carry military cargo to a belligerent you become a particpant yourself under any generally accepted military law.
@haldir3120
@haldir3120 2 жыл бұрын
@Mateo Hodge Why would I? My angle is that if somebody is needed to blame than its government who made civilian ship into a military target.
@stefanjoeres7149
@stefanjoeres7149 2 жыл бұрын
@Mateo Hodge Step 1: Germany declares unrestricted submarine warfare. Step 2: Put loads of weapons on a ship. Step 3: Naturally, Germany sinks the ship. Step 4: Feign outrage over Germany attacking civilians. Saying "Germany shouldn't attack the ship" is pretty ignorant.
@devondawkins5492
@devondawkins5492 11 ай бұрын
My grandma was born on armistice day and she never believed that narrative.... And that was pre pre internet
@TheT4xid3rmist
@TheT4xid3rmist 4 жыл бұрын
War is a Racket is one of the most fascinating books ever. I wonder what Smedley Butler would have thought of WW2 in hindsight.
@shanejones6955
@shanejones6955 3 жыл бұрын
That it could've easily been avoid. The U.S could've stopped the outbreak of the War by letting the British and French know that if they went to War over Poland, they wouldn't get a can of beans from the United States much less loans, financial assistance and arms...ect. Had the Western Powers not gone to War against Germany in 1939, Hitler would've simply got a year's head start on invading the Soviet Union and the two powers would've destroyed each other in Eastern Europe and the Allies could've simply swooped in and picked up the pieces in the mid to late 1940s without having to fire a shot.
@juicebox9465
@juicebox9465 3 жыл бұрын
@@shanejones6955 What about Japan?
@shanejones6955
@shanejones6955 3 жыл бұрын
@@juicebox9465 That was the only portion of either World Wars we should have fought. I do think FDR baited Japan into attacking us but they were dumb enough to do it.
@MrGksarathy
@MrGksarathy 3 жыл бұрын
@@shanejones6955 Maybe so, but Hitler was always gunning for the Western European nations, and appeasement or even leaving things alone straight up didn't work. Moreover, who knows what might have happened if the allies hadn't declared war on Hitler in 1939? He got super lucky in our timeline and managed to quickly defeat France, so what if he got lucky against the Soviets in 1939 and then swung around West? Really, the Western European powers were definitely justified in declaring war on Germany, and I will defend US involvement in WW2 absolutely.
@aryanbhuta3382
@aryanbhuta3382 2 жыл бұрын
@@shanejones6955 Oil embargoes for aiding Nazi Germany is quite reasonable, I think. That's not 'baiting' Japan to launch invasions of SE Asia and an attack on the US Pacific Fleet.
@ErichZornerzfun
@ErichZornerzfun 7 жыл бұрын
Minor correction but at 2:00 minutes you say the balkan countries came from former Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman lands but by the Balkan wars AH had not yet lost any territory to the Balkan countries.
@meganoob12
@meganoob12 3 жыл бұрын
Erich Zorn in fact they gained some territory. The only nation to lose something were the Ottomans
@Ugly_German_Truths
@Ugly_German_Truths 3 жыл бұрын
@@meganoob12 That is true for the First Balkan War, but not the second when the former Allies that had taken this land from the Ottoman Empire now were unhappy with how it was distributed and tried to "renegotiate" ... at gunpoint. Quite a bit of territory had changed hands and it was partially that "disappointing" end to the war that inspired Serbians to become more aggressive towards claiming "their" land from Austria, which lead to the assassination of Franz Ferdinand at Sarajevo.
@jgelt
@jgelt 7 жыл бұрын
A secondary consideration for the assassination of the Archduke. He was a reformer. There was an active movement in the Austrian-Hungarian government to come up with a political solution for the territories of the AH empire that were outside Austria and Hungary proper. The solution envisioned, was to expand the dual monarchy to a Tri-Monarchy. The idea was to seat a Slavic king and parliament to represent Slavic interests within the empire. When the Austrian Empire lost Hungary, the solution was the dual monarchy. The idea of a tri-monrachy seemed plausible enough that it terrified Serbian nationalists. If Slavic members of the AH empire felt represented, they might become a lot less restless. I'm not suggesting it would have worked. However the Archduke wasn't the first target of opportunity, he was targeted as a symbol.
@ekimaulthar2044
@ekimaulthar2044 7 жыл бұрын
so the Serbs didn't want my (Slavic) kinsmen to be represented?
@jgelt
@jgelt 7 жыл бұрын
That seems to be a major component to it. A slavic king might have stabilized the Balkans, AH reformers hoped it would and Serb nationalists feared it would. Would make some interesting Alt history.
@Sphere723
@Sphere723 6 жыл бұрын
Nah. The black hand weren't exactly political science professors. The whole organisation was made of fairly crude individuals.
@Ugly_German_Truths
@Ugly_German_Truths 3 жыл бұрын
Surprise twist jgelt: it was BOTH a symbol AND the first target of opportunity.
@Albukhshi
@Albukhshi 3 жыл бұрын
@@ekimaulthar2044 Well, they didn't want your people represented by people other than themselves.
@markyoung317
@markyoung317 4 жыл бұрын
American business was making huge amounts equipping the Entente without war. The US was woefully unprepared for war. The US lacked field artillery, machine guns,tanks and aircraft. The rifle we used most was a British design (Enfield model 1917). Rather than the Springfield model 1903, the standard US rifle. The reason the US had any ability to equip an Army was the fact we were equipping the Entente. I despise Wilson also. He needed to see the US ready for war in case it was drawn in. Neutrals can only remain so if they are strong enough to resist if threatened or attacked.
@thAC0gurl
@thAC0gurl 7 жыл бұрын
I just finished watching The Great War Channel's episode on US joining WW1. Interesting to see two historian's different take on the subject. If you haven't seen their videos, I would highly recommend the bite sized breakdown of WW1 from before day one to when they finish the series in 1918. Keep up the great work, really enjoy your videos.
@organicdudranch
@organicdudranch 5 жыл бұрын
the history channel twists things pretty bad, ask yourself who pays for those videos ?? look up who owns 90 % of the media. its all the same club. they control much thru information tampering.
@BlindingGlow
@BlindingGlow 4 жыл бұрын
@@organicdudranch Not the history channel you dumb*ss nazi, "The Great War" channel.
@vdl9673
@vdl9673 3 жыл бұрын
@@BlindingGlow same
@glennwhitehead6484
@glennwhitehead6484 4 жыл бұрын
The USA joined WW1, the day it started! True, there were no American " boots on the ground " but US industry, especially the arms industry was supporting Britain and other allied nations (France, Russia etc.) from day one!
@mikefay5698
@mikefay5698 4 жыл бұрын
Germany too in both wars. Arsenal of Democracy!
@BlindingGlow
@BlindingGlow 4 жыл бұрын
@@mikefay5698 Untrue. Until you source your claim, it's worthless. Maybe WW1, but definitely not WW2.
@dreadhead5719
@dreadhead5719 4 жыл бұрын
@@BlindingGlow A lot of cars the germans used were american.
@observationsfromthebunker9639
@observationsfromthebunker9639 4 жыл бұрын
@@BlindingGlow I don't remember the German army in both wars driving Chevrolets, Fords, and Packards. You will need to demonstrate some convincing proofs! What Germany should have done in both world wars was to seek out and encourage American sales and exports, and make the "neutral stance" a political hot potato as had been prior to the War of 1812. Somehow that didn't happen.
@observationsfromthebunker9639
@observationsfromthebunker9639 4 жыл бұрын
The USA already had much trade with the UK & France already. Wartime trade didn't seem too different, and was in fact profitable. There wasn't much comparable in the way of trade with Imperial Germany, and the United States respected the British blockade of German ports. It was sort of a one-sided neutrality on the production side, but the USA had not declared war, and had not pledged direct military support and assistance to the Allies. The renewed submarine warfare campaign of 1917 severely annoyed the USA, and the Zimmerman Telegram really frosted the cake.
@doomimp4025
@doomimp4025 7 жыл бұрын
3:20 Otto Von Bismarck called the Balkans the powder keg of Europe, and also he said "One day the great European War will come out of some damn foolishness in the Balkans", this however was a self fulfilling prophesy as he had agreed to Austro-Hungarian seizing of Bosnia-Herzogovia. This and other actions lead Russia to leave the "Drei Kaiser Bund" (Alliance of Austria-Hungary, Germany and Russia) as they came to see the alliance more favoured to Germany and Austria-Hungary. The Russians later entered into an alliance with France, which held a grudge against Germany for the Franco-Prussian war.
@trauko1388
@trauko1388 7 жыл бұрын
No, Russia attempted to renew the treaty with the Germans and dumbass Willy DECLINED thinking it unnecessary, then isolated Russia obviously turned to the French...
@doomimp4025
@doomimp4025 6 жыл бұрын
The non-renewal of the Reinsurance Treaty (the successor to the Dreikaiserbund) was only the last straw as Russia had become increasingly more dissatisfied and isolated in regards to relationship with Germany and Austria-Hungary. The split was a while in creating.
@trauko1388
@trauko1388 6 жыл бұрын
True, but the Russians did intend to renew it in spite of it all, it was Willy's fumbling that doomed the whole thing. Aint monarchy great? "The secret of politics? Make a good treaty with Russia." - Otto von Bismarck If only Bismarck had been alive to help him, oh, wait...
@doomimp4025
@doomimp4025 6 жыл бұрын
Wise and cunning Otto Von Bismark made a mistake in the Balkans, which would develop into something fatal. Kaiser Wilhelm II was really just an willing and unwitting puppet. I just think what Von Bismark said about the Balkans is probably one of history's greatest self fulfilling prophesies; like a smoker who says one of these days these cigarettes will kill me, and goes on to die of lung cancer.
@trauko1388
@trauko1388 6 жыл бұрын
Well, actually the famous Bismarck quote is misunderstood, what he ACTUALLY said was that the "whole orient wasnt worth the life of a German soldier" and that was in the context of the 1876 Russo-Ottoman war and the straits. Remember also that Willy FIRED Bismarck and then did whatever he fucking wanted, like letting the Russian alliance lapse. See McMeekin, "The Russian Origins of WW1" If Germany had kept the Russians as allies, there would have been no war... or a very short one.
@williamcfox
@williamcfox 7 жыл бұрын
Waiting for the chill-dub-trap-tropic-Reggae remix of that anti war song
@CynicalHistorian
@CynicalHistorian 7 жыл бұрын
LOL, I actually tried to find some Electro-Swing remix of the last song (about murdering the Bugler), but didn't find any
@williamcfox
@williamcfox 7 жыл бұрын
The Cynical Historian that last song cracked me up. So weird
@heibk-2014
@heibk-2014 6 жыл бұрын
The Exploration hey its political junkie 🙄😏
@wondashozen
@wondashozen 5 жыл бұрын
Digital Mystikz- Anti-War Dub
@willphillify
@willphillify 6 жыл бұрын
War is a racket is an under read book. Thank you for plugin it. I hope more people read it.
@euanreid6682
@euanreid6682 7 жыл бұрын
Crack me up.... it was just a matter of money... Britain and France ran a billion each up on their war tabs and if they had lost uncle sam couldn't collect.
@trauko1388
@trauko1388 7 жыл бұрын
Germany was under blockade with Wilson's consent, by allowing US banks to lend money to the belligerents Wilson was allowing them to finance the Entente exclusively, thereby creating the situation in which if the Entente lost they would drag the US banks and economy down with them. And that is exactly what Bryan warned Wilson about when he did it in 1915. The money situation didnt just happen, was deliberately created by Wilson.
@FireAssayDevil
@FireAssayDevil 7 жыл бұрын
There were 2 groups involved in the Sarajevo assassination: 1. "The Black Hand" Serbian nationalists exclusively favoring Serbian interests, a rogue element of the Serbian military, who provided the weapons. 2. "Young Bosnia" Yugoslavist or pan-southern Slav unionists (Believing in a free and independent nation for all Southern Slavs, albeit under Serbian leadership), who conducted the assassination attempts.
@Ugly_German_Truths
@Ugly_German_Truths 3 жыл бұрын
not really a rogue element, but a conniving arm of Serbian military intelligence (a secret service equivalent)... If or in how far they acted without knowledge or authorization of the Serbian government is unclear and therefore contested
@bluekjar
@bluekjar 6 жыл бұрын
Just found your channel. I was happily surprised how good the content is when looking at your subs. Keep it up, and the mighty algorithm shall reward your work.
@c3920
@c3920 5 жыл бұрын
This channel is so awesome, thank you!
@ryant1506
@ryant1506 6 жыл бұрын
You’re a rock star bro!! Thanks for the hard work you share
@markncl100
@markncl100 7 жыл бұрын
Thoroughly enjoyable and thought provoking. Excellent video.
@matthewkimble6099
@matthewkimble6099 7 жыл бұрын
Amazing musical research!
@Aviator-Chicken
@Aviator-Chicken 3 жыл бұрын
I get the Zimmerman note and while the Loustitaina was tragic it was justified in the sense that British cruise lines had weapons on them
@varana
@varana 7 жыл бұрын
12:35 AFAIK, unrestricted submarine warfare was started again in the beginning of 1917, before the US declared war. --- IMHO, WW1 (both the actual outbreak, and this topic) is a prime example of the human tendency to assign agency and intention in hindsight, and the general good feeling of _knowing_ the _real_ deal and seeing through muddied waters.
@gladehartdreamer5620
@gladehartdreamer5620 6 жыл бұрын
it is both natural and necessary to investigate the past to try and understand what happened, simply believeing the narrative you where passed down is just as moronic as rejecting it merely to feel like you are smart and know things, so if you merely state that the author of this video is only doing this to feel smart wthout actually pointing to anything that shows why he would be wrong is basically admiting that you just as moronic as you are trying to say the author is.
@mikefay5698
@mikefay5698 4 жыл бұрын
Lies are as American as Coca Cola and Pepsi. But nothing can function based on lies, Science is true other wise it can't function,has to be replicated. Lies can never be proven!
@likemyshortsplease
@likemyshortsplease 7 жыл бұрын
Great presentation!
@alankohn6709
@alankohn6709 4 жыл бұрын
As an Australian who from a population of fewer than five million, 416,809 men enlisted, of which over 60,000 were killed and 156,000 wounded, gassed, or taken prisoner in WW1 all for King and country my guess would be some mix of all of the above.
@miketaylor5212
@miketaylor5212 6 жыл бұрын
the british also cut the transatlantic cable keeping us from hearing the german side of story.
@mikefay5698
@mikefay5698 4 жыл бұрын
The British spied on everyone including the Germans. They tapped the cable didn't cut it! These days the US Secret Police chief Bill gates spies on the whole planet including the USA!
@mikefay5698
@mikefay5698 4 жыл бұрын
No spliced into the cable! Spy's don't cut!
@starrynight1657
@starrynight1657 2 жыл бұрын
The German side being - we want the French colonial possessions!
@Oppeldeldoc1
@Oppeldeldoc1 5 жыл бұрын
My showing of this today was interrupted by a recruiting ad.
@T.GLongstaff
@T.GLongstaff 3 жыл бұрын
The Lusitania was also carrying my great grandfather. Which is what sparked my passion for history.
@Dan87653
@Dan87653 3 жыл бұрын
As soon as he said he has a strong dislike for Woodrow Wilson I hit the 'thumbs up'.
@joeydarcy1009
@joeydarcy1009 Жыл бұрын
Just came across your channel and this content is great
@disco1974ever
@disco1974ever 7 жыл бұрын
Glad to be Sub#9398. First video of yours and I am very impressed. So much solid, factual, referenced information to digest that It took me an hr to complete the video. I paused to fully understand the graphics and notations and so much information I wasn't aware of that interested me I often digressed to look deeper! Looks like I'll be bingeing on The Cynical Historian the rest of my Sunday. P.S. I really appreciate your clear methodology. History may be a "soft" science but done properly History contains all the values of the rational scientific model.
@christophera556
@christophera556 4 жыл бұрын
Wilson and his business mates should have been strung up.What they did haunts the world a hundred years later.
@Arcsinner
@Arcsinner 7 жыл бұрын
nice animations for the lyrics during the song
@elizabethfoster4297
@elizabethfoster4297 7 жыл бұрын
Just as an aside, my father used to wake my sister and i up for school in the morning singing that song at the end. Oh the memories.
@Xpwnxage
@Xpwnxage 2 жыл бұрын
This is one of my favorite videos from you.
@dbuyandelger
@dbuyandelger 7 жыл бұрын
The US joined the war on the winning side to have a say in the post war world order. Wilson's 14 points and the establishment of League of Nations was the American vision of post war world order.
@xeagaort
@xeagaort 6 жыл бұрын
jake jones becuase we didn’t want be a part of something so useless.
@spartanx9293
@spartanx9293 4 жыл бұрын
@jake jones that's congress for you
@spartanx9293
@spartanx9293 4 жыл бұрын
@@xeagaort were a part of u.n and we all know how useless they are
@Hand-in-Shot_Productions
@Hand-in-Shot_Productions 3 жыл бұрын
I've heard the exact same thing! In April 1917, World War I was already in it's closing stages, and thus, the Allied victory was inevitable. Of course, the winning side tends to be the one who reshapes themselves and the losing side, so considering all the money and the political influence that being a somewhat major power in the Entente, the United States finally joined World War I in 1917. The US government of the time claimed that it was to avenge the sinking of the _RMS_ _Lusitania_ (which was almost two years sunk by then) and defend self-determination in German and Turkish colonies (which became British and French colonies after World War I, and only began becoming sovereign states after World War II). However, despite how many Americans still believe these narratives, the US ultimately joined the Allies of World War I to get a slice of the metaphorical cake, so to speak. That sure explains why it took almost _two_ years for the US to avenge the deaths of a hundred or so Americans on a ship that wasn't even _yours,_ or why it took _three_ years for the US to declare the German colonial empire bad!
@markyoung317
@markyoung317 4 жыл бұрын
In fairness with the world's largest navy being the Royal Navy just how were US businesses going to supply the central powers? The RN started a blockade early and kept it up. Neutral ships were inspected, and who was going to stop the RN?
@matthewm9987
@matthewm9987 5 жыл бұрын
I think the small skirmishes lead us to the entry and Wilson knew it would do so.
@chrishachet8622
@chrishachet8622 6 жыл бұрын
I despise Wilson.
@aceous99
@aceous99 5 жыл бұрын
he despises u more
@mikefay5698
@mikefay5698 4 жыл бұрын
I despise and hate Capitalism, creepy Joe or Trumpy Pumpy? Killer Clinton waiting in the shadows!
@michaelward9880
@michaelward9880 3 жыл бұрын
I despise Wilson too.
@fonsarethusa235
@fonsarethusa235 7 жыл бұрын
Hi, Cynical, Mexican viewer here. A lot of people don't remember this war (maybe because it isn't well taught in history lessons, but I'm kinda guessing), but some of us do and yes, we are resentful. A few years ago I traveled to Panama and learnt about the really bloody U.S. Intervention and realized it's always the same happening again and again, but today just in another latitude. SAD!
@trauko1388
@trauko1388 7 жыл бұрын
What is your opinion on Walter Karp's "Politics of War"? He deals with Wilson there in a very interesting and persuasive way.
@backchat8086
@backchat8086 6 жыл бұрын
Subbed. Great vids
@tk9780
@tk9780 4 жыл бұрын
If you were to say that WW1 started with The Bulkan wars of 1912- then WW2 started in 1933 when Japan invaded Manchuria.
@______608
@______608 3 жыл бұрын
*1931, I think.
@tk9780
@tk9780 3 жыл бұрын
@@______608 I stand corrected
@zanicdu8323
@zanicdu8323 7 жыл бұрын
Thank goodness, someone else who see's Wilson as he was.
@richmcgee434
@richmcgee434 4 жыл бұрын
Apropos of nothing, my grandfather used to sing that "Murder the Bugler" tune to wake us up when my family used to visit him over summer vacation way back in the 1970s. Very nostalgic, haven't heard that one in years.
@emilianoescudero322
@emilianoescudero322 3 жыл бұрын
Mexican here: In Veracruz, especially in Tampico, the People are proud to have resisted all they could to the Americans who invaded the State while the Constitutionalist Army did nothing. In the same way in the Punitive Expedition, Mexico defeated Pershing's Forces in the Battle of Carrizal. On the other hand, the Zimmermman Telegram always seemed to me the most Stupid thing that Germany could have done, and I believe to what extent it was Desperate at that moment: Mexico, apart from being in Civil War, could hardly satisfy its Needs for Weapons and Ammunition thanks to the Factories Built in the Porfiriato, but we literally depended on the United States and Great Britain for the most part (In fact, Germany gave a lot of help to Pancho Villa, but almost all in the form of Money to buy Arms precisely from the Americans. ), As a Blocked country that could not even decently support the Easter Revolt in Ireland that I encourage was going to Encourage us to enter a war?
@Arcaryon
@Arcaryon 2 жыл бұрын
Thing is; we never know how exactly something like this would have gone but you can actually argue that Germany was trying to use Mexico as a distraction. If it heightened tensions enough to cause even small scale violence, knowing Wilson’s record, this could have escalated quickly and tied down US industry supporting the Entente. It may also have hoped that Mexico could actually put up a resistance that bled the US forces out via irregular warfare, using the vast territory for a style of warfare that where perhaps the best comparable to German tactics in Africa.
@heinolvendahl8167
@heinolvendahl8167 6 жыл бұрын
will you do one on the bonus army? and the VA to day?
@acem82
@acem82 3 жыл бұрын
Good video. I certainly learned things with this video. That being said, not joining a war isn't "Isolationist". That means no diplomacy or trade with other nations. Thank God most nations are "isolationist" in most wars!
@clarkgwillison
@clarkgwillison 7 жыл бұрын
love the WW1 tunes you use in the background
@radhominem
@radhominem 4 жыл бұрын
Damn, I would have loved to have used that last song bit as a marching cadence at some point. Too late for me now though lol
@thomaspaine3394
@thomaspaine3394 7 жыл бұрын
I agree with you Wilson also he did made the federal reserve, and the income tax, thanks Wilson for the future problems we have today :( , by the way great video as always master historian. :) 👍
@CynicalHistorian
@CynicalHistorian 7 жыл бұрын
Ho man, the Fed. Now that is divisive. But personally, I'm with you on it ;->
@DawnOfTheDead991
@DawnOfTheDead991 7 жыл бұрын
They had an income tax before the war
@7711sammy
@7711sammy 7 жыл бұрын
Wilson did not make the Fed, he helped put it into law. Before 1913 we were strongly against central banking. The Rothschild's started this in England in order to put the country into long standing debt. They also famously funded both sides of most wars. In America we did not want central banking and for several years we were at war with central banking, Andrew Jackson hated it, and anyone that was pro central banking. He even killed a Rothschild spy. In 1910, 6 of the most wealthiest people in the world met and wrote the Federal Reserve Act, One of these people being JP Morgan, and a member of the Rothschild, as well as Rockefeller family, one of the members was actually the secretary of treasurer of the U.S at the time. After sometime in 1913 they convinced Wilson to implement it to congress, It was signed into law on Christmas Eve night while most of the people who would have opposed it were at home for Christmas, not knowing about it. What the 6 men didnt know was that Wilson also gave the rich bankers and Elite total power over all of the money in the U.S. which was a good surprise for them. A year or two later, the IRS was created by Rothschild, later an amendment would be ratified to make the IRS legal to take our "working income" . Here is a passage from a history quotes site.. The traitorous Woodrow Wilson "Despite these warnings, Woodrow Wilson signed the 1913 Federal Reserve Act. A few years later he wrote: “I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.” -Woodrow Wilson"
@WILTALK
@WILTALK 7 жыл бұрын
This is what happens when you elect a idealistic school teacher as President. He also got conned into closing his eyes to the injustice of the Treaty of Versailles as a trade off for his pet project the League of Nations. That sure worked out well. What a fool. He was either a fool or a closet Globalist.
@trauko1388
@trauko1388 7 жыл бұрын
If you think Wilson was an idealist you are an idiot.
@WasatyPanKazimierz
@WasatyPanKazimierz 7 жыл бұрын
Great video! Very informative. Your slavery myth-busting video popped up in my feed - I watched it, then watched this one, and subscribed to your channel. Although it is true that the events leading up to USA participation in WWI played a major part in the genealogy of modern conspiracy theories, I think that calling them the "genesis" is a bit of an overstatement. It should be noted that at that time the general mindset and framework for developing such theories was already in place. Some time ago I did a Polish translation of Richard Hofstadter's "The Paranoid Style in American Politics" and this essay comes to my mind as a classic account of the early history of American conspiracy theories. Although, from a theoretical standpoint, it rises some doubts, especially when we consider it as one of the models for today's rather cheap and demagogic method of discrediting political adversaries as simply mentally ill people. Currently I'm doing some reading in Irving Babbitt's thought, so I guess I should watch your video on Pragmatism next, since the New Humanists and the Pragmatists had a pretty heated, fascinating and sadly completely forgotten intellectual skirmish in the early 20th century.
@akramgimmini8165
@akramgimmini8165 3 жыл бұрын
Me as German: *VERDAMMT SEIST DU WIIIIIIILLLLLSSSOOOOOONNNNNNN !!!!!!!!!*
@MrZauberelefant
@MrZauberelefant 2 жыл бұрын
Godverdomme kut Wilson!!! (Lerne gerade Niederländisch)
@BountyFlamor
@BountyFlamor 5 жыл бұрын
10:22 That caricature is from Spain in 1898
@itsv1p3r
@itsv1p3r 4 жыл бұрын
that song at the end lol
@dawnstorm9768
@dawnstorm9768 2 жыл бұрын
If it's ANY consolation at all, one of the bridges crossing over the Potomac River into Virginia from Maryland, is named for Wilson. Everyone hates it, but if you know anything at all about traffic in the DC metro area, you'd know why.
@KTChamberlain
@KTChamberlain 5 жыл бұрын
Kudos for using a clip from the 1918 Charlie Chaplin film Shoulder Arms. Side note, Chaplin himself almost considered scraping the film because he wasn't sure if it was going to be well received to make a film about the First World War funny while America was still at war. That was until he showed the film to his friend Douglas Fairbanks Sr. and he had a good laugh watching it so Chaplin resumed it.
@DaidusIII
@DaidusIII 4 жыл бұрын
big and juicy video!
@NickDanger0001
@NickDanger0001 4 жыл бұрын
The uncle of a friend of mine was in Haiti. Wrote a book about being the more or less king of that big island in the bay. Wirkus was his name. I'll contact her for the details. Well done, by the way. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faustin_E._Wirkus After the Mayaguez, I looked into the history of US interventions and I'm sure you know it goes back forever. Got my info from the library at the AF Academy. I was stunned at the list. Went way back in China, the Pacific in general, etc. Not counting Jackson filibustering Florida. Anyway, I'm a fan. Keep it up.
@BlackCherubimintheflesh
@BlackCherubimintheflesh 6 жыл бұрын
Bravo!
@redmeat4vegans62
@redmeat4vegans62 4 жыл бұрын
Read "War is a Racket". See that most of the wars and interventions are really about corporate profits at the expense of the citizens of the countries we invade. I did not say ALL of our wars - but most.
@LePrince1890
@LePrince1890 5 жыл бұрын
Have you read the memoirs of Marine Major General Smedley Darlington Butler? He was a Medal of Honor winner and commander in some of the "little wars" of the Caribbean area. He felt that Al Capone was a piker compared to the government in grabbing power and wealth.
@LePrince1890
@LePrince1890 5 жыл бұрын
I wrote this before seeing you had. Sorry. I like Butler.
@theomagaeffect4710
@theomagaeffect4710 7 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately isolationism never works, mind you neither does rampant interventionism. But the problem with isolationism is you are leaving a possible military/economic threat unchecked while they get more powerful. For a very early example of this look no further than the Roman Empire, many tribes and nation states stood by and even had treaty packs of non aggression with Rome, but inevitably when Rome defeated the immediate threats and became more and more powerful they started steamrolling the people who had pacts of non aggression with them including parts of Greece who could have taken the Romans out while they were still fighting other nation states in Italy. This pattern has happened countless times in history including US non interventionism in ww2 (got rolled on with our pants down by the Axis powers) and also famously in ww2 the Russians who signed a pact of non aggression with the nazis got jumped, and if the winter had not been so early that year could have been knocked out of the war before they even got started!. If everyone had got together and shut Hitler down when he invaded Poland millions would not have died in WW2. But as I say rampant interventionism is stupid also, as with all things careful consideration and balance is called for.
@WILTALK
@WILTALK 7 жыл бұрын
It was never about protecting Poland. If it was they would have also declared war on the USSR because they also attacked Poland. Britain and France used Poland as an excuse to justify war with Germany with their people. They encouraged Poland to not come to an agreement about a rail corridor of access to Danzig and East Prussia. A problem created via the new borders created after WW1. The British were more than happy to let the USSR take parts of Poland in order to have them as allies against Gernany. If you really study the sequences that led up to WW2 alot of the British arguments do not hold water.
@theomagaeffect4710
@theomagaeffect4710 7 жыл бұрын
WILTALK Well I wasn't really talking about the reasons behind the start of WW2 but I was talking about the fact that as soon as Hitler started he should have had the smack down laid on him, the British (chamberlain) Americans Russians and french should have never let him get away with what he was doing pre war!, isolationism/appeasement was never going to work with a man like Hitler and that's that. Also it was mostly the french who were iching for war with Germany Chamberlain bent over backwards to stop a possible war!, earning him to be mockingly nicknamed the great appeaser!.
@christianweibrecht6555
@christianweibrecht6555 6 жыл бұрын
after the Macedonian empire broke into successor states all Hellenic groups where too busy fighting each other, expect for Sicily which was contested with Carthage
@tellmewhenitsover
@tellmewhenitsover 5 жыл бұрын
I think the ideal scenario is isolationist countries who will all hop on any single country that tries to do a power grab. That at least shifts all the fighting out of swords n' guns war territory and into trade wars.
@mikefay5698
@mikefay5698 4 жыл бұрын
I suppose the native Peoples of the America's were quite happy to be isolated. European disease and horror nearly wiped them out. Trumpy Pumpy thinks Corona will wipe out stroppy US Workers! Wonder if 2M US prisoners will be in lockdown like the rest of us? Wonder where that word came from?
@redblaze8700
@redblaze8700 3 жыл бұрын
Imagine a 1920 version of Alex Jones talking on the radio on how the U.S. planned WWI XD
@Censorededs
@Censorededs 4 жыл бұрын
I have a question, how come there's no nuance or proper context/background on these courses taught in High School or even college? Is there a way to properly teach history to even college students?
@RoyBatty03
@RoyBatty03 6 жыл бұрын
Extremely interesting :)
@melindagreer4177
@melindagreer4177 6 жыл бұрын
Actually, unrestricted sub war was started about a month before the US entered the war.
@samrevlej9331
@samrevlej9331 2 жыл бұрын
Conspiracy theories around governments and business leaders causing WWI were also common in Europe in the interwar period. There was this conviction that common people couldn't have wanted this, that wars were started by evil people in high places, and a huge pacifist movement swept Europe.
@Rj-pw7zs
@Rj-pw7zs 2 жыл бұрын
Gradual tensions seems more likely. A conspiracy that large never would have been able to stay hidden.
@floydwilliams7630
@floydwilliams7630 4 жыл бұрын
Take a look at Upton Sinclair and his take on politics and the world expressed in his Lanny Budd novels
@peterlawler2201
@peterlawler2201 5 жыл бұрын
1/ The RMS Lusitania was sunk by the U boat Captain who did not know that it was carrying Arms ( was a secret) so it would have made no difference (according to him ). it was unrestricted submarine warfare. Also it did not cause the entry into the War.
@peterlawler2201
@peterlawler2201 4 жыл бұрын
@Mactrip100 No the German commander said he sank the ship and knew nothing of what it was carrying. The German government decided to stop unrestrained uboat warfare after the outcry and reinstated it later. So you may claim what you like, the USA did not enter the War because of its sinking. On 22 December 1916, Admiral von Holtzendorff composed a memorandum which became the pivotal document for Germany's resumption of unrestricted U-boat warfare in 1917.On 7 May 1915, the liner RMS Lusitania was torpedoed by U-20, Try as you might you can not make U.S. Entry into World War I, 1917. On April 2, 1917, fit 1915.
@peterlawler2201
@peterlawler2201 4 жыл бұрын
@Mactrip100 Copy from the U20 captian's diary or was he ieing? Schwieger stated that he caught sight of the Lusitania in the distance, while his submarine was surfaced; he quickly submerged his vessel, moved into an attack position, and at 3:10 p.m., ordered the launch of the torpedo from a distance of 700 meters. The diary chronicles the chaos and panic he observed while the ship’s crew and passengers tried to put the lifeboats in the water as the ship listed sharply starboard. The ship sank after eighteen minutes; only six of the forty-eight lifeboats had made it safely into the water.
@Omega0850
@Omega0850 4 жыл бұрын
I think there is no country in this world where the disparity between how democratic it seems vs. how democratic it is, is as big as in the United States of America.
@skynyrdjesus
@skynyrdjesus 3 жыл бұрын
Im not sure any good sentence has ever begun "And then there was Haiti." I mean, it must've happened at least once, but I can't be sure, and that feels like a problem.
@LeonNikkidude
@LeonNikkidude 3 жыл бұрын
Smedley looked like comedian Hugh Herbert!It's interesting!
@lowersaxon
@lowersaxon 4 жыл бұрын
„Objective truth“. Greetings from 🇩🇪
@jjnn2
@jjnn2 4 жыл бұрын
You live in a flag?
@Arcaryon
@Arcaryon 2 жыл бұрын
@@jjnn2 You don’t?
@alexanderdiazcafmclinic6616
@alexanderdiazcafmclinic6616 4 жыл бұрын
Please do a video on the historical partnership of US and Great Britain... Wondering if you can debunk conspiracy theories but also show the real story of why we came in on their side so often, despite having 2 wars against them and 1 possible war against them (civil war)
@nathanlamb75
@nathanlamb75 Жыл бұрын
I didn't know about the American occupation of Veracruz until I heard that song about it from Warren Zevon. It starts like this: I heard Woodrow Wilson's guns I heard Maria crying Late last night I heard the news That Veracruz was dying Veracruz was dying
@blairbuskirk5460
@blairbuskirk5460 3 жыл бұрын
Though the Archduke's limo driver may be responsible for some of the blame of the success of the assassination. He turned into a dead end alley and had to back out to turn around, incidentally directly next to a certain Serbian nationalist of historic renown.
@soralb6368
@soralb6368 6 жыл бұрын
As always, very informative. Just one small mistake. The US declared war on Germany months after the new wave of unrestricted submarine warfare had begun. By this time, many American ships had been sunk. The Germans fully expected that as a result of this, the US would eventually join the war. However, they had calculated that Britain would be knocked out of the war, sooner than the US could have any meaningful effect. Their calculation, was of course wrong.
@Sphere723
@Sphere723 6 жыл бұрын
Well their calculation wasn't entirely wrong. The Germans were able to launch their big Spring Offensives of 1918 before the US could play a substantial role. It is just that Spring Offensives started off strong and petered out and ultimately didn't end the war. The Germans failed on the battlefield, not in the calculation of when the US would become effective. It should also be noted that Germany was starving and couldn't have continued the war in any event. So the gamble to go all in in early 1918 was probably the most prudent thing to do.
@mopeybloke
@mopeybloke 7 жыл бұрын
How do you resist the temptation of making a video about Woodrow Wilson?
@archdukefranzferdinand567
@archdukefranzferdinand567 3 жыл бұрын
The assassination of...who?!?!
@terrellbraggjr4648
@terrellbraggjr4648 2 жыл бұрын
Oh shit
@TheArmybrat1994
@TheArmybrat1994 5 жыл бұрын
Government should have never gotten this big. Limiting our rights under the guise of safety. It's sad.
@blairbuskirk5460
@blairbuskirk5460 3 жыл бұрын
U.S. Was a "neutral" profiteer until the outcome seemed forgone then they threw in with the imminent victors. Interesting side note if it wasn't for Edison muscling Hiram Maxim out of the Electric industry he never would have moved to England and would never have turned his engineering chops towards machine Gun development.
@jakewalters3951
@jakewalters3951 4 жыл бұрын
When interests align no conspiracy is necessary. The convergence of bussines interests investment in the British and French war effort, the work of British and French agents and agencies to turn US opinion against Germany, and the interventionist forgiven policy and big government domestic policy of the Wilson administration all worked together to bring the US into the war even if there was never a single mastermind or group of people intentionally orchestrating the whole thing.
@donaldstough677
@donaldstough677 4 жыл бұрын
1 thing you need to remember is Wilson had a stroke and his wife ran the country for Wilson last 2 years
@brandanb9735
@brandanb9735 4 жыл бұрын
In addition to being the worst president in US history, Wilson and his progressive colleagues were Europhiles and Atlanticists. Intellectual, cultural and economic ties between Europe and the progressive movement had been strengthening for decades, which eroded America's traditional apathy towards Europe, particularly on the East Coast. Wilson was an ideologue, he saw the war as an opportunity to solidify his transatlantic worldview into law, through the League of Nations. He didn't have to enter a land war in Europe. Wilson could have waged a naval war against German subs and still secured American interests...but he saw the war through his own millenarianism. There's a reason why "isolationism" (which is both a misnomer and a slur) held strong in the Midwest, a region largely removed from these Atlantic connections and largely populated by German-Americans.
@dougnapier6441
@dougnapier6441 3 жыл бұрын
It sounds like Germany was desperate and was throwing out hail marys
@Paul-oi2wz
@Paul-oi2wz 7 жыл бұрын
10:15 lol, can't imagine apple and AOL companies ware exciting back then.
@gamingforyou9895
@gamingforyou9895 4 жыл бұрын
Can you tell me the name of all the songs
@TheAustinWoolShow
@TheAustinWoolShow 3 жыл бұрын
Wrong. The U.S. joined WW1 to study for the big test 20 years later. Duh.
@marschallblucher6197
@marschallblucher6197 4 жыл бұрын
10:03 Hay look it's the flag Haiti AND Lichtenstein.
@captainchaos3053
@captainchaos3053 6 жыл бұрын
It's the most straight forward answer there ever was. Money or more importantly Gold! Saves they day again, oh how I wish that was the case.
@hunterharbach3317
@hunterharbach3317 10 ай бұрын
U.S. Marines learn about Smedley Butler even today. A true American
@WilG082
@WilG082 2 жыл бұрын
Smedley Butler was this closet to a real life Big Boss we’ll ever get
@qwertyuiopgarth
@qwertyuiopgarth 7 жыл бұрын
My guess is that there were several reasons that the US became involved in WWI, and a mildly effective conspiracy or three may have played a minor role. Partly this is because I tend to assume that solid evidence of an effective conspiracy would have been uncovered by now (some documents would have been uncovered somewhere), but I do find it plausible that a few conversations may have occurred about how to best take advantage of events. The effects of those conversations may have been consequential, but probably only because of events beyond their control. And even if those conversations were contingently consequential there does not seem to be a reason to assume that things would have been vastly different if those conversations did not happen. Most conspiracies are primarily, and often only, important to the participants.
@mikefay5698
@mikefay5698 4 жыл бұрын
Your contribution is inconsequential. Never mind you'll make a good Lawyer or TV News Presenter!
@Jehoshophat
@Jehoshophat 4 жыл бұрын
Are you saying that German trade and influence was competing with US trade and influence and the US basically conspired to eliminate the competition? Was this done for similar economic/power reasons to Russia for decades? Is this now being down for the same reasons to China risking yet another world war?
@Disthron
@Disthron 7 жыл бұрын
If the man in charge is conspiring against the organization, does the conspiracy need to be that widespread or does it just need a few key leaders?
@JMM33RanMA
@JMM33RanMA 5 жыл бұрын
I have read things, including a slim volume entitled "American Imperialism," but didn't have all of the information that you have presented, and certainly didn't connect all the dots. "Post hoc ergo propter hoc" can be true, but is often a fallacy. There are a number of reasons for seriously disliking Wilson, you have suggested some that I hadn't thought of. Keep up the good work.
@CardamomYGO
@CardamomYGO 3 жыл бұрын
9:55 Not resentfull, but my father is from Tampico. His grandpa told him stories of those gringos who tried to invade his beloved city.
@danielstratton1670
@danielstratton1670 7 жыл бұрын
As long as you ignore the most obvious of scenarios? Don't offend those that will literally try and hurt you.
@fapplejax5486
@fapplejax5486 4 жыл бұрын
Rocking a fleece and a PT shirt. 😆😆😆
WWII: Everything Changes | US history lecture
44:54
The Cynical Historian
Рет қаралды 91 М.
What were the effects of WWI?
14:36
The Cynical Historian
Рет қаралды 102 М.
1❤️
00:20
すしらーめん《りく》
Рет қаралды 32 МЛН
Маленькая и средняя фанта
00:56
Multi DO Smile Russian
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
Omega Boy Past 3 #funny #viral #comedy
00:22
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 23 МЛН
The Two Faces of Communism
57:59
Best Documentary
Рет қаралды 546 М.
How Revolutionary was the American Revolution?
17:09
The Cynical Historian
Рет қаралды 110 М.
When America Feared A Communist Takeover
10:55
KnowledgeHusk
Рет қаралды 834 М.
Why Did The First World War Break Out? (July Crisis 1914 Documentary)
29:57
Citizen Kane, Trump, and Hearst | Based on True Story
27:01
The Cynical Historian
Рет қаралды 90 М.
What caused the Cold War?  #ProjectMAD
33:28
The Cynical Historian
Рет қаралды 97 М.
Debunking the Free Stuff Kennedy Meme | The Diatribe
15:49
The Cynical Historian
Рет қаралды 112 М.
What Caused the Texas Revolution?
19:22
The Cynical Historian
Рет қаралды 71 М.
1❤️
00:20
すしらーめん《りく》
Рет қаралды 32 МЛН