I say, shame on the world, these countries know right from wrong, so don’t suck up to misinformation.

Free Azerbaijani land ? Azerbaijan are the occupiers in Armenian lands.

Sky News bias

Western double standards

the girl could have just used google

@@sahinyasar9119 cope.

Constantinople is supposedly Turkish territory 🤷‍♀️ Turkic colonial double standards.

Doesn't give Azerbaijan the right to ethnically cleanse and murder the Armenians who have lived there for all their lives. But that’s what they’re doing right now.

It's also been autonomous throughout the Soviet Union and then de facto controlled by Armenia since the 90s though

@@milanvasarhelyi u mean taken after the war? Conquered and occupied? Not controlled...

well, they (NATO) did take Kosovo from Serbia so it all depends who does the taking

Why not wtf? If that region wants to join their main country they should do it. With war if needed

I highly doubt him being an UNBIASED analyst though. I explained my reasons in a separate comment. Hopefully, it won't be shadowed by KZfaq and people who are interested in truth and not Propaganda can read it.

So refreshing to hear him speak so objectively after that lady

@@TurquazCannabizthat ‘lady’ was not even hiding how biased she was either with her language or emotionality or hand gestures. Professional journalist ethics is dead, they might as well have invited a passerby from the street

@@JN-wr9he Oh yeah it was terrible I agree

Clarke unbiased, lol! Clarke: Az is committing ethnic cleansing and maybe genocide too and Armenians will get no autonomy and will be kicked out from the land they've been living on for like 1500 years ....... BUT but the good thing is that Russia is too busy to prevent the ethnic cleansing / genocide and that means that the west is winning and that is what is the most important! What a bunch of dumbasses.

Lie. He never said that.

​@@mardbalasy6671he did

😂😂😂

In beginning of this conflict, great Sakharov with his armenian (!) wife come to Azerbaijan to explain us his understanding of the conflict. He has several meetings in Azerbaijan. In the meeting in the Academy of Science after his speach in favor of Armenia, our historìan professor in short explained him the truth about the Karabakh and the conflict. After that meeting he never back to this subject. Probably he also made panishment to his armenian wife for false information.

Hello Bot

A legend? I can remember when that word actually had some meaning.

Borring

@@tyroneuva-py1pg Borring?

She’s just very biased in favor of the Armenians. Imagine her reaction though, if someone said to her that the Falklands or the Channel Islands were “supposedly” part of the UK?🤔

"Supposedly" because the USSR didn't do a great job creating useful borders between these two when they were part of the USSR, so that area probably should have been given to Armenia but it was given to Azerbaijan instead and those borders persist to today.

​@@whilecontroller😂 no.

@@whilecontroller not a valid argument.

@@whilecontroller lol not even a nice try. both countries have recognised each other’s borders explicitly and in writing

“Please tell the whole story” 😭😭💀💀💀💀 bruuuhhhh miserable

That dosnt justify war

Because they are Muslims

​@@adrianbalboa5353so , when Germans took the whole of Europe why did europeans fight ? It wasn't justified then for Europeans to fight Germans .

@@bozok6360 Gharabakh has became part of azerbaijan because of turkey request and by Stalin's signature.gharabakh/artsakh fought the war that azerbaijan started and was able to defend itself and create sequrity zone. obviosli in 2020 war that was heavily supported by turkey and under silence watch of West/ATO countries gharabakh could not stand. coming to 'Germans took the whole of Europe' yes the 1991 WAS JUSTIFIED for gharabakhi armenians.

the collective West is amazingly forgetful when it needs to be. It forgets about Equality, Democracy, Liberal values, Freedom of Speech, and the rest of the BS it's been pushing for the sake of all those 'velvet revolutions', Arab springs, and so on.

ay qunem azgt🤮

Western media isn’t watching now if they did Azerbaijan would look like crap.

They don't need to air every single grievance from the last 300 years to talk about this conflict.

there was no azeris population, There is a lot of Azeri and Turk propaganda and lies. Even people who pro azeris are not able to carry on azeris lies.

When English crusader colonialists stop supporting Zionist purging of palestine and give up occupying Northern Ireland, then and only then will we take their stupid comments seriously on karabakh.

exactly! Look at the words she picks up “supposedly “. She doesn’t not want to accept the fact that the region belongs to Azerbaijan whatever armenain influenced the mass media propagates in the world. Its a fact that azerbaijanians lived there for tens of centuries and deported only 30 years ago

Journalist have become mouthpieces for misinformation, propaganda and incitement. Journalists are the least reliable people when it comes to actual facts, history, cause and effect. There is a saying, one does not need to buy a journalist because they are up for rent.

turkey actively wants cyprus united and free (unification ideas of the island with greece was the starting point of the invasion). there were several referandums and negotiations throughout 2000s.

Orrr maybe its about integrity of azerbaijan. Maybe its about the khojaly.

F Azerbaijan ​@@pu1317

And Russia backstabed them as they always do.

awareness? is that the new euphemism for misinformation?

Ermeniler nankör bir millet, Romalılar onlara köpek gibi davranıyordu. İstanbul şehir merkezlerine almıyorlardı. Hatta bir çok Roma tarihi yazıtlarında Ermeniler için, Hırsız, Yalancı, İkiyüzlü gibi ifadeler geçiyor. California'da da şuanda nefret ediyorlar. Osmanlı ise herşeyde onlara özgürlük sağladı. Ne yazık ki bu dünyada bazı insanlar hep nankör olacak.

its not there lands Armenians have lived there for 1000s of years and historically its been armenian the ussr gave artsakh to azerbaijan artsakh so Armenia stays in the ussr the ussr made fucked up borders

There's nothing to celebrate here.

Let’s go Clarke

your legendary clarke is a biased bigot

@@La_La_Land_ ok

MAGA TRUMP

finally someone who doesn't want to wipe out the other side

Utanmırsan sən?

yet azeris support ukraine. azeri bot. XD

@@georgegazaryan7358long love Azerbaijan

​@@aaronnicholas3653zionatzi crap I thought jooz hate Muslims,itzak?

@@georgegazaryan7358🇹🇷🇦🇿

@@georgegazaryan7358 Armenia helps and supports Russia in its war against Ukraine but it's OK with the US, Germany, and France. None of them demanded any sanctions on the Armenian government. Truly DOUBLE STANDARDS. armenian bot ;p

Would not surprise me. One of the stipulations for membership is not having ongoing territorial disputes. That is what put the Georgian admission on indefinite suspension after the 2008 invasion.

@@davidford3115 don't Greek and Turkey have territorial dispute

@@thedstorm8922 Not at the time they were admitted. The dispute is a recent development encouraged by Erdogan and the Turkish Nationalists looking to deflect attention from the failing domestic policies.

Nato right now would take anyone and everyone to join ! It’s a failed and weak group who no one listens to ! Not even the us who created it😂

What streets are they ? 😂😂😂😂

Obviously with their history of hundreds of years of invasions, subjugations and colonizations of others … add couple of genocides. “ brilliant “ indeed.

Treaty of Alexandropol It was signed by the Armenian Foreign Minister Alexander Khatisyan in the early hours of 3 December 1920. However, the previous day, the Armenian government in Yerevan had resigned and transferred power to a Soviet government, backed by Soviet Russia and so Khatisyan was no longer acting on behalf of the government of Armenia, and the treaty was technically invalid.[1] The terms of the treaty was prepared by the Turks, with the Armenians having no input. It required Armenia to cede to Turkey its entire province of Kars together with the Surmalu district of Yerevan province. A large part of the south of Yerevan province was also to be ceded to Azerbaijan.[2] The second item on the treaty acknowledged the border between the two countries.[3] The Treaty of Alexandropol changed the boundary of the First Republic of Armenia to the Ardahan-Kars borderline and ceded over half of First Republic of Armenia to the Grand National Assembly of Turkey. The tenth item in the agreement stated that Armenia renounced the Treaty of Sèvres. The Treaty of Alexandropol was to be ratified by the Armenian Parliament within a month. That did not take place because Soviet Russia occupied Armenia.[citation needed] In the agreement signed by the resigning Armenian government and Soviet Russia's representatives in Yerevan, Russia recognised the boundaries of Armenia as they had been before the Turkish invasion. However, Soviet Russia eventually acceded to Turkey's territorial demands at the Treaty of Moscow, signed on 16 March 1921.[citation needed] It was further ratified as the Treaty of Kars, signed by the Grand National Assembly of Turkey and, at Soviet Russia's insistence, the three now-Soviet republics of Armenia, Georgia, and Azerbaijan.

lol turkey mass genocide armeanians

I agree with your main point but 1) Armenians also suffered intensely and violently and 2) Azerbaijan needs to dismantle the Armenophobia and hatred it breeds with state-sponsored propaganda, lies, rhetoric which it teaches in schoolchildren. It must start there. But they won’t. Because this is their savage sadistic culture., to murder, mutlate and torture with pleasure. Nothing has changed since 1915. And they are exterminating all the Armenians now in the villages.

@Gsuzaman, When this war kick started in 2020 my fear was the Azeris were essentially going to do to the Armenians what the Armenians did to them in the 1990s. Oddly enough that didn't happen. They took control of the entire area in a huge military campaign and roughly 20 civilians died during the entire conflict. That isn't easy to accomplish in a warzone. So what ever terrible experience they had in the 1990s (Armenia brutally ethnically cleansing 800,000 of their civilians) thankfully the Azeris showed restraint and didn't do the same thing back.

It’s started few hundred years ago. Not in 1990.

They will never do that, they simply don't have enough dignity

Nakhchivan.

Nah. Noone will allow that to happen. Not even iran.

Armenia invaded Azerbaijan 30 years ago and killed tens of thousands of Azerbaijanis. I would be surprised if Azerbaijan is satisfied with just taking back its lands. Armenia has never paid compensation

That would trigger CSTO provided Armenia wishes to remain in it. Although Russia is weakened, I dont think Azerbaijan is stupid enough to do that. They will create the conditions, ie coerce, Armenia for a road corridor, but I dont think Armenia will give in as the original agreement called for 2 corridors, one the Lachin Corridor to NK and another traversing southern Armenia into Nakchivan. But with the dissolution of Armenian control over NK and the Armenians of NK choosing to leave for Armenia proper, Lachin corridor no longer exists. Since Armenia no longer has a need for a corridor to NK, Azerbaijan effectively lost their bargaining chip to the corridor with Nakchivan.

I hope they do! Time to put the Armenian issue to rest permanently

Вы ждёте справедливости от Европы? От тех кто веками угнетают стран востока и Африки? Они варвары в галстуках и белых кофточках.

Bunu ingilis dilinə çevirib yenidən paylaşa bilərəm.

因为你们是邪教伊斯兰人 没人欢迎邪教徒

@@turkanenovruzova3842没必要 油管有自动翻译功能

In exchange for what? What did the Azeris offer in return?

@@SLD-bz9so Why does Catalonia (Spain) have autonomy? Or Northern Ireland (GB)? Kurdistan (Iraq)? Crimea (Ukraine, before annexation by Russia in 2014)? Vojvodina (Serbia)? Or Nakhchivan (Azerbaidjan)? Because that's what civilized countries (even Russia at some point in history) with some semblance of democray do, to set their respective minorities at ease. Check the complete list of autonomous regions on Wikipedia, in order to understand that it's nothing out of the ordinary for sovereign nations.

How about the autonomy the Armenian population in that region had enjoyed for the preceding 70 years?

@@Yanni75 Drones

Nobody is forcing them to leave, they're leaving by their own volition

I find it interesting how some media outlets simply don't mention this 800lbs elephant in the room which actually kick started this conflict.

plus 300,000 were ethnically cleansed from Armenia in 1987

Facts are foreign language to Christian-western nationalists.

​@@williamdavis9562how can they sell propaganda if they talk about genocide done by Armenia. Remember the goal here is the make Armenia a victim.

​@@vugarhasanov5360ethically

Not true, it was armenia that turned their back on Russia and is now facing west with the same promises given to ukraine before in joining the eu & nato.

Azerbaijan could not deoccupy its territories earlier just because of Russia. Because. It is Russia who occupied karabakh and then passed it to Armenia. I have seen a lot of Russian solders in the battle filed of the first was.

When pashinyan took power and stars movement towards Europe, Kremlin allowed Azerbaijan take back its territories .

🙄🙄Well Muslims never disappoints from kashmir to soth eroupe the ethnic clensing continue and now nagorno karabah and this also show the hypocate nature of west they didn't even tried to save their own from the same continet cristian brother cause this time the aggressor is not russian

Hasn't Azerbaijan already invaded Armenia proper, and taken about 50km² of land?

@@baardi2 after Soviet collapse BOTH Armenia and Azerbaijan signed a deal when they got their independence. The deal, which both signed, gave karabakh to Azerbaijan. And Armenia signed it. So, legally, karabakh is for Azerbaijan. Ethnically and democratically, people there are mostly Armenian and want to be part of Armenia. So, LAW and DEMOCRACY are now OPPOSITE to each other! The democratic judgement is certainly not legal! I personally think Armenia, who signed the deal in 1991, should not claim the land whatever the reason. Even Iran recognises karabakh as part of Azerbaijan, not Armenia! That's why they didn't intervene, because they think Azerbaijan is right to claim that land, as it's legally theirs. But if they go a single inch further into Armenia, they would see the wrath of Persia!

@@sonic9137 impossible. In fact the opposite. Iran can take Azerbaijan from inside. That's why they prosecute religious leaders, destroy mosques, ban religious gatherings, etc., because they KNOW Iran can use its religious influence to take control. But Azeri Turks in Iran are one of the MANY tribes, and can't overcome the will of the others and the highly centralised government. Iran was much weaker JUST AFTER 8 YEARS of brutal war with Iraq, when the Kurds (which are much more interested in becoming independent than Turks) made a civil war. The civil war was crushed swiftly. If the worst happens (an Azeri civil war), Iran is MUCH stronger than before and Turks have much less motivation than Kurds, so I claim iran can deal with them much more easily and quickly. And Iran has a highly complex internal security mechanism, which is called Basij. They're in every city, and in fact, every neighborhood. They're based in mosques and tend to be religious youth. These mobilise when another opposition crowd is gathering for a civil war/revolution. Their sheer number and commitment is staggering. They would crush any uprising FROM WITHIN. Look at what happened during the protests last year. Sorry, but Azerbaijan would fall in 72 hours if iran invades it. Iran will not, because they fear turkey. So, all they can do is to go to Armenia and defend it. And they will do it. And because this operation is not, by its nature, an offensive against Azerbaijan, I don't think Azeris in Iran would bother much protesting about it, as every human being hates war and those who initiate them for personal gain.

​@@sonic9137one day Baku will be singing the national anthem of Iran Inshallah 🇮🇷💪💪!!!

@@lou6749 airani dreams 🤣🤣🤣

there was Chingiz Azeri journalist ,who even confirmed that Khojalu has been committed by Azerbaijani andbSoviet KGB AGENT Heydar Aliev to overthrown the that time president he even confirmed that Armenian troops were 5-10 km away from the crime scene , couple of days later Chingiz gets shot in Baku What does the Khojaly Massacre evidence reveal? Some of the most compelling testimony about the Massacre is from Czech reporter Dana Mazalová. She described her interaction with famous Azeri journalist Chingiz Mustafayev in the days following the event. Mazalová’s lucid recollection provides vivid details of the killings in an area controlled by Azeri soldiers. She noted how the video shows that victims were shot in the knees, and then some scalped after death, with no Armenians present. She also stated that the Azeri authorities used the horrific scene of decomposing bodies as a propaganda event. There are two critical points from an evidence perspective. First, it would have been virtually impossible for the victims to have been shot at knee level by Armenians kilometers away. Secondly, it is implausible that Armenians would be able to approach the site and disfigure the victims in an Azeri-controlled area, so this abuse must have been falsified.

Really, it failed to mention several important factors. Sky news lowering your IQ.

Perfect hypocrisy

i doubt its the azeri people pushing this but nato themselves who people right now ask why criminals 1945 were not held to account and are now being eulogized as heros in a way to scorn russia ,instead of arresting peoples outrage and grudges they used them to start a bigger war ,its no longer about armenia but russia and iran wake up and see the bigger picture on the map and dont get lost in politics of it all

azerbaijan broke that law starting a war against 'internationaly' recognized own citizens, and that war ended with new borders that both sides agreed to resolve without war and azerbaijan broke it again. so, all azerbaijany rights fit into its military power. here we go again, the territory that azerbaijan exists owned by iran then russia. so, no turkev or other european country can claim any right there, unless they go to full big hot war.

@@08yallvon look up what the United Nations said about it….and why the United Nations is not doing anything about it

Russia has the same moral compass as the USA. Azerbajian floats on oil. No surprises why Russia isnt showing a backbone in dealing with this issue

US or the West has no interest in intervening at any point, because an Azeri military offensive to capture the southern corridor to the enclave, could potentially trigger Iran to get involved against Azerbaijan (Iran has pledged and warned that they will), which in turn will drag in Turkey. It's like a dream come true for the West.

The west supports Azerbaijan

Cretinous comment, It was armenia that turned their back on Russia and is now facing west with the promise to join the eu & nato. Armenia unilaterally recognise that territory as azery, they let down their own people and gave up nothing to do with Russia.

This is nonsense Armenia wanted to join NATO and it's literally the US, UK and EU that mostly supplies Azerbaijan

Russia didn't give any green light. This conflict makes Moscow look incredibly weak. That's the last thing the Kremlin wants when long subjugated ethnicities in Russia are wondering if the window of opportunity for revenge has opened yet.

Russia has zero grip on Georgia except occupied territories.

Nothing will happen the region is run by Russia,Iran and Turkey next election comes the Armenian government will be trow out because of the failure to keep Nagorni-Karabach there is already people protesting against the government already it's national disaster every Armenian friend i spoken to are angry and most of the anger is towards the government and Azerbaijan.

Don't forget Stalin's hand in the situation. The exclave of Naxçıvan was specifically his creation.

Western double standards though

@@JN-wr9he Which "West". This is a modern tactic. Deport all the native population, replace with Ex-Pats and then claim it as historical. This is the MO of Russia since WWII. Yes, the West (primarily US) acts as planetary sheriff (good or bad), but they have not 'kept' Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, or Afghanistan as the Russians have sought to do since the end of WWII . If we want to really go back, we should give all of Russia to China as much of Russia was pretty much owned by Mongolians for quite some time.

No, the difference her is Armenians have lived in the Nagorno-Karabakh area since the 4th century and before. They lived here, before the Azeri started to live in what was later known as Azerbaijan. That is different from colonising an area and moving your ethnic people in like the Russians have done.

​@@benjones4365except they DID ethnically cleanse then colonize Azerbaijani lands around nagorno-karabakh after they won the first war Yes Azerbaijan is overdoing but Armenia had it coming, at any moment they could've said ok we won but here's your lands with your people and we'll keep our lands with our people and we both become happy, instead they mistreated Azerbaijanis and alienated the entire world and brought karma upon themselves

Thats not what this conflict is about

No

*WRONGLY GIVEN BY STALIN TO AZERBAIJAN.....WRONGLY...SAME THING HAPPENED WHEN THE BRITISHERS GAVE HINDUS LANDS TO PAKISTAN AND MUSLIM LANDS TO INDIA....*

I'm expert, and no, it's not part of Azerbaijan.

​@@angelomd82 We can say the same about western parts of Ukraine, actually Putin always claims the same bullshit about how these parts of Russian soil were given to Ukraine by Stalin. What is done is already done. We have to respect official territories of every country which is internationally recognized.

No, they decided to go the other way. Soon, Putin will not be able to travel to Armenia for fear of being arrested. Kazakhstan is next.

Armenia, Greece, Bulgaria and Romania only exist because of Russia. These countries made up countries.....

Armenia had occupied Azerbaijani land. Made himself sandwiched.

@@kamranmustafayev6580 oh yeah, a less powerful and smaller nation has somehow occupied land of a bigger nation which is getting help from turkey, just like palestine has occupied israel's land while israel is getting help from USA.

@@niks660097 Azerbaijan has gotten richer only recent years due to oil reserves and Armenia was backed up by Russia way Way more than Azerbaijan ever did by Turkey. Even in recent war, there are footage of Russian tanks being supplied by to Armenia through the Iran border and probably for free because Armenia has no economy to buy weapons like that. While all the Turkish and Israeli drones has been paid for by Azerbaijan. Small country = innocent, Bigger country = the bully is pretty stupid take. The first Karabagh war happened after the soviet collapsed when both of the countries was in a bad state and it happened because Armenians in Karabagh wanted independence and they won that war while also capturing 7 nearby terrioties, displacing over half a million Azeris. And this is internationally recognized, Azerbaijan tried to get those lands peacefully foe 30 years through negotations but Armenia didnt retaliate, thinking Russia will back them up as always and they were wrong. Go read history before making claims like that.

100% this

@MrAgustaBell the truth is, however, azerbaijanis from Kafan in Armenia were the first refugees of the conflict in 88 after the calls for miatsun - to connect with armenia and then it came as a snowball. All Azeris from armenia got expelled and armenians from azerbaijan. History will always remember how all those close to a million azeris had to flee and live in tent cities, dorms of the universities for 30 years. History won't forget...

Not anymore, illegal instution dissolved

No it’s started few 100’s years earlier. Don’t forget Armenians are the oldest Christians civilization and they are indigenous to those lands.

Qeletivi ele

But it is internationally recognized as Azerbaijani. Should native Americans have the right to USA, Canadian, and Mexican land. They can’t because they don’t have the rights to that land even if they lived there for centuries.

History is in the past, tell the Americans to go back to Europe and leave their land to the Indians

😂 that was a good one

InshaAllah 🤲🏼

inshellah on azerbaijan

Hopefully

Wouldn't be too surprising as they are insatiable and unreasonable people taking what is not theirs.

​​@@YuNgHaSaNgo pleasure a goat

hahaha ,

Your telling me there is no difference between a defender and an aggressor? Please do some critical thinking then comment.

@@gavinpanjar5559 Armania invaided Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan taking its soil back.

@@Behemoth713 sure they technically have the legal right to do what their doing. But no moral right.

oh for God sake, look whos talking, what critical thinking your talking about? Azerbaijan independence declaration itslef doesn't recognize Ssoviette borders, so how come reclaiming a region that was a result of serviette administrative borders, that was ileegaly been annexed from Armenia in 1921 by illeegal and unrecognized Bolshevik USSR, karapagh region was recognized internationaly by league of nation as part of republic of Armenia till teh red army occupied Armenia and became a part of soviets union, and your talking about critical thinking, lol mines well the history. @@gavinpanjar5559

Karabakh is Azerbaijan

I am partially Jew and I support the Armenians. This was always their land. The Azeris are invaders, like the Arabs in our land.

Atheists, jews, and Muslims fighting against innocent Christians...

Fuxx both

Countries of pro-occupation.