At 18:25 I'm concerned that it comes off like I'm telling the dudes who don't like Mario 64 to "stfu" and I'd just like to say that is not the case, I respect their right to their (wrong) opinions, they are just a (much more harmless) part of the larger point I was making. Let's not fight! Let's maybe be best friends. I hear opposites attract ANYWAY, ENOUGH OF THAT BORING SHIT, PALETTE SWAP. GRAAAAAAAHHHHH www.youtube.com/@PaletteSwapMag twitter.com/PaletteSwapMag paletteswap.site/ Something I wanna correct the record on - the stat about our attention span is dubious and I apologise for spreading misinformation if it's ever proved to be outright false. It is undeniable that it's dropped significantly in the past few years, but I've never attached myself to the idea that it's "now shorter than a Goldfish", which does sound pretty ridiculous, lmao. Prob should have def used a different screenshot in that case, my bad! I think my point still stands

so many video essays are literally just people linearly describing the thing they're talking about, adding nothing to the original topic. this consists of probably more than half big movie review/analysis youtubers.

May I leave a long rant? Thanks for speaking on it, I've noticed it for a loong time and it bugs me too, even if I'm completely complicit, I used to make analysis/topic vids more than a decade ago. I barely engage with entertainment/art anymore and just put on mindless youtube vids in the background. Its easier. No commitment. Less chance of it being a miss. Curated for you by an algorithm. Easy stimulation. Less attention span required. The option paralysis indeed keeps us there. Some of these vids are indeed genuinely interesting and good, similar to a good documentary. But many are just..Mostly recaps of basic things. Like a wikipedia summary. Many are made just to pander and get views as well, because KZfaq and audiences like me reward that kinda thing. Effort has almost become unfeasible, as evidenced by animators. Look at where oneyNG and Egoraptor went..Lets plays, and doing their creative stuff elsewhere. I'm glad Smiling Friends got a deal with Adultswim. In a way, traditional forums have mostly died out and have been mostly replaced by Social Media and KZfaq. Instead of making a forum post, we record it to KZfaq. You could write it on a blog and nobody will read it. Put it in a KZfaq vid and suddenly it gains traction. At least with forum posts, the emphasis was placed on the topic and discussion, but now it's mostly placed on the social clout/interaction and personality of the creator. Commentary media of entertainment, art, or other media seems to be what we care about most, and it's often made in a throwaway ''content factory'' way. I remember when the Angry Video Game Nerd inspired young me. Sure it was commentary media, but he really made those episodes their own like a TV Show back then, and it was very personal, authentic and infinitely rewatchable. A lot of the more innocent stuff people used to just upload as a hobby. But now it's a ''job''. An often inauthentic one. and it saddens me when someone covering a comic book gets a million more views than any of those comics ever will. I'd always take notice of how different ''vimeo'' was. Outside some neat animations and skits, KZfaq was filled with effortless lets plays, blogs about mundane things that were barely edited, news (or drama) coverage, live reactions, reviews that barely said anything, etc. But at least back then, vimeo was more like Newgrounds, it had a lot of original creative video projects on there like little short films. Sure a lot of Newgrounds was crude but it let almost anyone get their creative thing on there all DIY without the limits of a mainstream industry. It was punk rock. I like discussions and opinions, I like media, I like art, I like entertainment, I love expressing interest in it and reflecting on it, but clearly something is up here, the ratios are skewed. It all sits at an..interesting sphere. Generally human creativity is divided in that which is more practical, that which is more entertaining, and that which is more artistically expressive. This commentary media sits in a weird in between. You COULD put in the effort to make something really good that takes a long time to polish up, but as you stated, you will not be rewarded for it. You COULD try to trim your long winded hour long vid down to a polished 30 minutes that still retains everything but is just more efficient but you're actively punished. My conclusion is that KZfaq has become a weird mix of TV, journalism/journaling and Social media for years and years, but it has been dominating the entertainment and art we've now been leeching off of rather than tributing to. And it's honestly kinda sad. it is certainly not creatively fulfilling..

Very good, off to participate in some discourse related to the topic

I’m really glad I watched this. As someone who makes art, I think this focus on criticism is actually really harmful to the process of making art, being fearful of the boogeyman in your head who keeps calling what you create stupid or a waste of time, or, by god, uncomfortable. The reaction and essay kinds of videos have their place, but it’s important to remember that distinction. Good stuff fudj

You're question about "how much new media versus new video essays have you consumed" is spot on. I used to play games of so many different varieties and quantities. But now, I realize I haven't actually played a single new video game in over 5 months, despite plenty of them being available on demand in my Steam library. I haven't listened to any new music, watched any new TV shows, or movies for that matter. I can't remember the last time I even went to a theater. But I have watched a *ton* of video essays and KZfaq videos in general. So much so, that I almost exclusively watch them at 2.0x speed (including this video), because I know if I didn't, there wouldn't be enough time to get through all of them. Which isn't to say it's all been a waste of time. There've been plenty of fantastic videos that have enriched my perspective. At some point, though, it would be nice to actually engage a piece of media on its own terms, instead of hear about it second-hand. I feel a bit culturally stagnant, and the walls have closing been closing in ever since. Hopefully I can change this.

What joker 2 gets wrong about rooftops is too accurate

It continues to astound me that people who work soul crushing 9-5 jobs come home at the end of the day and choose to spend some of that money on monthly donations to people who already make more in a year than they're going to make in the next decade just playing games on camera, or "reacting" to things.

This is basically the conclusion of Ratatouille, extended to appease the KZfaq algorithm.

This is the video essay ever, of all time. On the topic of the video, I'd like to say this genre of content is a farm now Video essays on media are not only supposed to be a deep dive into a topic viewers aren't that knowledgeable on, but at the same time should let the viewer explore new stuff from the creators perspective The current model is that a popular franchise or individual drops something, some popular essayist makes a simple video on it then 10 more essayists do the exact same thing while adding a single extra flair to it which I find boring in general. Where are the days essayists are passionate on topics which they ignite the discussion to, and why don't they embrace a style of their own for that process?

Excellent video, Fudj. A lot of the comments here seems to be missing what is supposed to be the main takeaway here. Making videos about media you like or don’t like isn’t a problem. All this video is saying here is that it’s a bit sad how KZfaq now has way more content critiquing art than we do art itself, whereas that hasn’t always been the case. As a viewer I’m guilty of perpetuating this too. More times than not when I’m sitting down for lunch and looking to watch something, I’m seeking out a video essay on something I’m intimately familiar with rather then trying out a new show or movie or sketch or whatever.

I feel kinda weird watching this cause i only ever watch video essays about games or movies that i've already experienced. Like last year i spent like 200hrs in TotK then flooded myself wth reviews, essays, discussions, etc... about it lol

Im about to delete youtube off my phone right now because of this video. This app has given me nothing and it has taken so much of my time that i could have been spending engaging with real art and culture around me. Thank you for opening my eyes funny pink British thing

I’ll just drop a recommendation to ceave perspective. Genuinely some of the most engaging video essays I’ve ever seen on the platform because you can instantly tell the amount of research he puts into figuring out the obtuse stories of the games he covers. Is he the first person to dissect majora’s mask’s story? No, but his version is easily the most compelling iteration I’ve ever seen. No matter what, this job is an easy job, but there’s voices that are worth listening to, and I hope someone from this comment section can give those voices a try as opposed to more… slop centric pieces.

I hadn't given much thought to how much space video essays have taken away from more creative videos on youtube. Great video! I think I'll try and base what media I'm engaging with less on if there's a podcast or video I can watch about it once I'm done going forward.

Ironically, searching for "the problem with youtube" brings up countless videos similar to this one.

I think about a creator like Arlo who’s extremely talented and creative, with an infections enthusiasm, and in a world without KZfaq, someone like him would likely be wasting away in an office or retail setting. On the other hand, KZfaq has limited that brilliance and creativity to opinions on Metroid and Switch 2 speculation / rumors. It’s a mixed bag.

Sure video essays are easy, but making quality video essays with an airtight script where the visuals match with what you are saying, and what you're saying being actually VALUABLE, is hard. They also aren't always opinion. When the point of the author is backed by evidence and corellating facts, its more than opinion.

I think there's an important emotional factor here. Commentating on other works can be brushed off as an opinion, but creating original works means talking from yourself and your experiences. You need to be vulnerable to the public, and the mere idea of a genuine part of yourself being judged by strangers can be terrifying.

Thank you for bringing up how animators have left the platform. I'm an artist and have worked at a few minor studios here and there. I considered trying to make content for YT at one point, but immediately thought against it because there was no economically justifiable way to compete on the platform without basically destroying my life and mental well-being. It is not feasible to be an independent animator without outside support, so I really don't know how some of the remaining animators maintain careers on KZfaq at this point, as it just seems like a losing battle. Long form content and reaction formats have basically destroyed the motivation to create for an environment that rewards low effort people more than actual creatives who want to make something totally new. I don't really know why it got to this point, but I hope it all folds in on itself one day to make way for a better artistic atmosphere. Thanks for always having an honest perspective in your videos. The genuineness really does set you apart from a lot of other video game related KZfaqrs.

Video essayists will be like: I really loved this thing, it was amazing, now I'm going to explain its entire plot to you for a majority of the video and if you haven't played/seen it you should click off. It's never necessary. For me, those kinds of videos *are* good for one thing: background noise.

I guess I'm an outlier. The video essayists I follow are all ones that either cover a niche topic outside of my wheelhouse-I enjoy _OSP's_ "Trope Talk" but *am subscribed* for Blue's analyses of history and architecture and Red's dissection of myth (see also: Miniminuteman on archeology and Lindsay Nikole on zoology)-or bring a fresh perspective that would not have occurred to me based on education and upbringing (Jessie Gender, for example, or this one videogame essayist who refuses to use the words "good" and "bad" in his reviews and instead goes on about _ludonarrative dissonance)._ Huh. I think you've just explained why most of my time spent with The Algorithm is spent telling it that I'm "not interested," regardless of what "people who watch X also watch."

I've noticed any internet wide issue of lack of creative investment - not only on youtube. People are so caught up in engaging with discourse that it's extremely infuriating. You may not get the views you want, but you /did/ create something. We can argue if it actually contributes anything til we're blue in the face, but the point is that taking the time to create something isn't popular anymore. We're rather argue til the end of the world on social media than create, and I hate it. It's because the internet allows us to reach a wider audience no matter our niche that makes me so frustrated over this. We're able to gain friends with share similar interests much easier, but too many people desire fighting on twitter than creating. I'll rather consume creative slop, then consume useless discourse all day.

4 minutes in and it's already such a banger EDIT: Just looked at my tabs and I have ~10 video essays about things I like or find interesting queued up, we truly live in a Society

Video Essayist vs. Podcaster in a competition for "who has the hardest time getting a business account from the bank?"

Really great vid. I can feel your points here. Humanizing what people make I feel like a see less and less I've always thought with some games It's a miracle these things get made let alone them being made by a small group of people. I feel like really deep diving into undies has really done that for me in particular. You saw a similar thing with Palworld to some degree no way they expected that to blow up as much as it did and the discourse was so obnoxious. I also feel a spark from this vid just hearing more from that voice I've felt it's really rare I actually criticize something like a game until I have played to the credits and maybe even looked up some of the development. Please keep making the content your making they are all gold and take care.

Thanks for this wonderful video. "Yummy scrummy discourse" will be a phrase thats front of mind when I think about what kind of art or content I should be consuming.

Gosh this was such an eye opener. I shall watch the video a thousand times more and keep my eyes open for any KZfaqr who posts a video delving deeper into this topic.

Great video. I appreciate your work and pointing these kinds of things out to people. Honestly, I'm not sure how much validity there is to the "shrinking average attention spans" concept because I'm not even sure how you would properly measure that, especially over a large period of time. But anyway, I can't say I like living in a world where creatives and smart people are punished for making thoughtful pieces or works of depth

Honestly I see it as more of a problem with capitalism and copyright law and the unique way they interact. Media becomes a commodity (and if you don't understand what's bad about this then you have a lot of learning to do) and by that point what you're observing here is only natural. I don't think it's possible to foster an environment under capitalism and copyright law where this *doesn't* happen. It feels to me like this video is complaining about a symptom of a much larger problem but it weirdly leaves that part out so it feels incomplete, and I think this is why.

Apparently, people don’t use their subscription feed to watch videos, and I have no idea why. If you legitimately rarely watched KZfaq, I could see. But otherwise, why wouldn’t you? It’s the best way to find video YOU like, because YOU curated it. KZfaq suggestions are pretty good, but it won’t be as good as you, plus it requires refreshing the page a lot and gambling. Whereas your subscription feed shows at least two dozen without refreshing.

Since 2022 I have made a playlist where I catalogue every video essay I've come across that I think is by a new person (with around 95% accuracy). That playlist has 2,300 videos.

I say we go from calling people “video essayists” to “professional yappers”, because that’s what they do. Yap

Damn. As a counterpoint, what about indie animation like the Amazing Digital Circus? That exploded on KZfaq and was just a team of people creating something not based on an existing IP. Or Hazbin Hotel started out as a pilot on KZfaq and ended up becoming a hit on a streaming service. These are pretty recent examples of creative works succeeding, even if they are very rare.

I don't listen to video essays regularly anymore, and haven't for a couple of years (besides a select few creators, wink). This video summarizes why. Not that it matters, since you talked your shit perfectly, but I'd like to echo it is as someone with fingers in many pies. I'm in a rigorous program for environment design in games, going to start training for narrative design soon too, but I also spend a good chunk of time writing analysis about games that already exist. I do not publish this writing or make videos, probably won't for a while yet, because editing takes time I don't have. But when I *did* have a few days off from school/work and wanted to try making a video, I made something A. predominantly negative and B. ramble-y. It was hard to make in a few days... mostly because of learning Premiere. I stand by my rant, but damn, ranting is easy. It's actually relaxing for me to write game analysis, because I get to engage in subjects I love without the mental load of "whole cloth" creativity. I've basically experienced what max effort video essay writing is like... copious research, structuring and restructuring, etc. The work of a real "essay". As you said, good essay writing takes a lot of effort. But I'd say that even when you're analyzing with quality, research, and depth... writing about something that already exists, compared to my daily creative hustle? Not to say that it's easy, but it's certainly not in the same realm of practice-based skill and emotional vulnerability that Making New Shit requires. I can't imagine how easy it is for the once-a-week video essay writers that you mention. I know you're not trying to sound resentful, but I feel it coming through and just... amen dude. God, I especially hate when the entire video is just a rundown of the game... ugh. How is that fulfilling to make? Beyond financial fulfillment, I guess. Anyhow, loving everything on Palette Swap so far and excited to see what you do next. I hope eventually you can make the videos that you want to make instead of the video essay thing, though you kill it regardless. Tism to tism real quick... it's got to suck to only be able to do one thing while maintaining your sanity, but still being unable to do it in a way that really makes you feel like you're putting stuff out there with all your creative might. My part time office job only works because everyone fucks off and leaves me alone all day. If I have to make environment art for the next COD or write Overwatch character quips or something after 6 years of training... I will ponder... minecrafting in Roblox. I don't know what the phrase is anymore.

A video essayist leaving a comment on a video essay from a video essayist.

I can't wait for reaction channels to watch this video so I can film myself watch them watch it and contribute to the discourse of watching things

I don’t know if I speak for the masses on this, but I find myself gravitating towards wanting to watch other people enjoy something than enjoy it myself. Time, money, and effort are all things that I consider as limited and important resources to have. Realizing I could skip out on spending $60 or more on newer video games when I can just watch other people play them instead- and that’s assuming the game itself even interests me in the first place? Edit: Coming from someone who used to want to be a creative writer, I’ve felt way better about abandoning that mindset than I ever felt actually doing the writing, because I no longer had to try and ask myself why I wanted to make things. It was never because I’ve enjoyed it- it was because I thought there was a chance other people might enjoy it.

Thank you for making this video. I’ve held this view for a few years. It makes me shake my head to hear content creators describing themselves as creatives. They have no idea how difficult it is to create something. Yes, talking about the work of others is easy. I love video essays as much as the next guy, but video essayists and the people who watch them often get arrogant and dismissive of the true creatives.

It is funny that the kinds of videos that provide me the most enjoyment aren't video essays and reviews on youtube. Albeit they're interesting to watch sometimes, especially if they pull you into wanting to see how the video gets resolved, but a lot of videos I feel just ramble on about stuff to the point it goes over my head to where I have no idea what they're talking about to really comprehend what I just watched, or they're just incessantly complaining trying to prove why something's bad which makes me feel empty inside. The fact that animated music videos, and parody skits feel more impactful to me is because they're making the most out of every moment. An hour long video essay isn't going to keep me coming back due to it's long duration and slow paced presentation like say a 5 minute video music video will. This is kind of the reason why I rarely re-watch video essays. A lot of the time I can predict what they're going to say, especially when it comes to the typical stuff people always bring up regarding the topic. I'm kind of sick of them. It also doesn't help I'm a scatterbrain of sorts always wanting to hop around youtube to find new channels, so I'll get bored with a lot of these videos midway through and try finding something more entertaining. It's crazy how video essays strive to be the definitive topic on a particular subject, meaning the length of the video needs to cover everything that person wants to talk about leading to these videos to be longer than your average movie just to get all the viewership focused on one video. It would rather get lost on youtube finding several more interesting channels than watching something that long. By the way I haven't even started this video yet, so maybe I do have a short attention span. At least I'm addicted to KZfaq instead of TikTok as if that makes anything better. I probably need help.

Finished the video. As stated before with my playlist, I saved those videos because I thought "What if I made a Video Essay Video Essay, haha!". I actually do have things to state about on that topic... You mention in this video how essays detract from proper artworks, that's true, but there's some essays out there that gave me knowledge and made me feel as much or maybe even more than some works I've experienced. Those like 3 Blue 1 Brown, CGP Grey, and Tom Scott are an example of the classically informative essayist... But a video I think of is Hazel's "a normal creepypasta retrospective", which is a video essay about... nothing, it's all made up, and then ""a normal creepypasta retrospective" EXPLAINED" which is a video essay about that fake video essay and how the content within it was made up all along. What was the point of the original if it means nothing? It brings no knowledge? I mean it's supposed to subvert the genre and be 'art', but, to me it's the same as those longform videos that give me information about X thing that I'll soon forget, it doesn't matter in the end. And then I go back and watch someone like Running Shine multiple times over. Running Shine essays are truly something great in my opinion, they talk about the topic, add some some comical stuff, but aren't demeaning, preachy, or the inverse of that where it's just slop. The Running Shine essays with their calming house music and smooth talking, just being... cool... Now that's ART to me... Those made me feel. I wish more essays were like that. Or maybe not, as the problem is there's too many essays. Perhaps the fact that there's so few essays by Running Shine made them more special.

You’ve convinced me, I have to out-Quentin the Quentin. Then all the KZfaq’s will be mine

damn bro. I'm not video essayist so I can't word this eloquently but...this video is spot on

For me it's not about choice it's about time, I can't fit all of my favorite things in a day but I'm still interested in it so I engage how I can

“Hey guys, here’s my new video essay about a complex character from your favorite videogame / tv show!” *40min/2hr synopsis of each of their appearances with no greater discussion had on the tropes of the character, their journey, or the themes they carry within them* “Thanks for watching guys! I’ll be sure to put out a video of scrunglo mcdoogie in 1 day!”

That line about not wanting to be alone with our thoughts cut deep

Very insightful video, good stuff I'd probably compare dedicated youtube critics similar to restaurant critics, easy to eat and be opinionated and make money off of it than to actually break your ass to make an amazing dish with the effort put into it

KZfaq incentivizing quantity over quality? Surely you jest.

Marble Hornets really did feel like “a guy making a video” and not “a content creator creating content” and I miss that so much. I’m coincidentally watching through the director’s commentary for the first time as this came out and they even confess they had to make shit up for so many scenes. It’s hard to explain to my roommates and friends why it was important and enjoyable when they can’t help calling it cringe and all I can say is “I mean.. you’re right but so what lmfaoo”

I once again find myself watching a Fudj video and once again it is a very depressing experience. Very good video obviously but as someone really interested in making stupid videos I'm passionate about, a video like this does make me second guess everything. I know there is very little at risk with whatever I upload due to how unlikely it is for me to randomly gain traction but I still want to make videos I can be proud of. Though for that right now it is the viewer perspective that I am more connected to since well... haven't uploaded anything yet, perhaps I will one day after the 58th revision of my first script. The "What Joker 2 gets wrong about rooftops" especially hits home... Those are the kinds of essays I used to watch quite a lot and recently I have gotten away from them because yeah they really are often so empty. I am just watching them because it is a thing I like and usually it is a very easily agreeable topic. Like I'd watch a video about why a specific scene is so good and of course I already really like the scene, that's why I'm watching it but then why is that why I'm watching it? To get the very specific words about why it is good? What will that change? Will it really expand my appreciation for the scene? Possibly, but it is an incredibly safe video, there's nothing to engage with, I'm just nodding along and maybe gaining a bit of insight. Then I've watched videos I do disagree with in order to actually see a different perspective only to get hit with what basically feels like a recap. I specifically remember watching a video about a Doctor Who episode, an episode I dislike. It had a title like: "Why ___ is an underrated masterpiece" or something. Yes, there were points made but it was in a sea of this happens, then this happens, then this happened. I get context is needed when discussing something but so many reviews feel like this. I don't really feel like I have the experience of watching an essay as an alternative to engaging with the piece of media despite you making it seem like it is something we all do. Maybe I am just lying to myself, idk, just seems strange to me. I sure do watch essays on games I have played though and that could still be a flaw of time, doing that instead of further engaging with media. Like: beating breath of the wild and then watching an essay on the game rather than experiencing another piece of media that is able to give a similar experience. It is also like I am immediately undermining my own experience with the media by watching an analysis or something on the game which basically forces me in line with the general consensus of the game. Even if I have a different opinion from the consensus that is still me tying myself to it rather than letting the piece of media simply sit in my mind and naturally develop. You pretty much mentioned this in the above video I just watched though so IDK what the point of this even is... Also sorry for the long comment, I did not expect to write all this when I started but I just couldn't help it. This video left me feeling really uneasy, like I'm deflated which is why I said it was depressing at the start. I want to be creative but I look at this, I look at many of the videos I watch and I just feel like I'm so often watching stuff that isn't doing anything for me. How am I supposed to write something worth a damn if this is what I'm doing? I say that but there are still a bunch of creators I watch that I do truly think make good stuff, even if their content is still basically: guy gives opinion on media. Don't know if you'll read this, hello if you do! I don't know if I got anywhere with this mini-rant but this video was very interesting and I just felt like I needed to comment something. I hope I can create stuff I'm proud of and I look forward to seeing what you create on the other channel since I will absolutely need to check it out after this.

I think people forget that good critique kinda requires creative labour and it easy. I mean you can just list off bullet points of things you like and dont like and call it critique (you can also make that format creative btw) but in the long run, that isnt actually going to change anything. Critique thats good and dynamic gets remembered and does something different, it might even actually change media going forward.

This is one of the discourse moments of all time

I don't know...I don't fundamentally disagree with most of your points, but I don't love the way you treat this whole genre of writing as some category other than "real creativity." I could off the cuff list off dozens of video essay channels that have a compelling, unique writing and/or editing styles with clear effort and passion behind them. You acknowledge that some people can do video essays creatively, but still seem to regard them as the exception and regard the whole concept as at its core uncreative, which I disagree with. A good essay pushes past the media it includes to say something new and true beyond it. Some people fail at that, sure, but there is no lack of brilliant writers on this platform succeeding at that and I think that's beautiful. And I think this idea you're working with that online media critics have become the real celebrities, somehow, is bizarre, frankly. Like, what are you talking about? Media criticism is not more of an industry than media. It's a tiny blip, really. The average coworker has never heard of a video essay, but they watch movies and play games. No online critic has reached the celebrity Ebert and Siskel achieved decades ago. Maybe I'm in my own bubble too where I've somehow avoided all the worst sides of this field, but I just don't see where you're coming from. Like you pair that final line with footage from TotK as if nobody's ever heard of Eiji Aonuma. But they have. They know him. "There's a KZfaq video for every opinion in the world right now." But no there's not! I don't mean that pedantically, either. Art analysis and art criticism are tremendously complex. The well is nowhere remotely close to dry for compelling video essays, as writing about art has the same potential for depth as the art itself: essentially infinite. Because video essays are art too. They can be bad art, often are, but there is no division separating them from "real art." There are hundreds more possible ways to write about how Super Mario 64 is overrated because everyone is capable of bringing something new to the table. I know your main points are that we should spend more time engaging with the primary art, that by a quirk of the numbers video essays have been unfairly prioritized by the algorithm, and that KZfaq critics should be criticized more often than they are. I agree with all of that fully. I just wish you actually criticized the particular practices and creators you dislike with specificity, rather than minimize an entire artform. Like, why did you say in the first minute that you can make an 8-hour video in two weeks? I know you know that's not true. But many viewers won't know you're exaggerating. Even the laziest 8-hour video is hundreds of hours of work. Now thousands of people in your audience will come away thinking anyone can make one of those things in a handful of workdays. It feels like you lied, there, to make your point sound stronger.

Spot on all the way through. This video feels years ahead of its time.

"Nothing is lost, nothing is created, everything is transformed" - Antoine de Lavoisier

I'd like to say that I've been thinking about this for a while, but I have not been. I'm working on developing my 3rd... 4th? game, which I intend to be the first one I release publicly. And I am worried that some design decision or story beat will lead to a video essayist making the game seem awful, or bring on some sort of hate mob. Something like that happened with The Citadel, the game that most inspired me to make an FPS, where an off-the-cuff comment made by a video essayist lead to a bunch of people harassing the game's creator in a way that was eerily similar to the moral panic around the early first person shooters that inspired it. Anyway, my hope is to make the next The Citadel, a game that will provide me enough money to make another one, while also being mechanically interesting with a distinct art style.

For the longest time I have wanted to make videos about my opinions on different video games, there just happens to be a big roadblock in my ability to write essays or anything in that matter so I've felt that Im not able to present anything valuable to the table which is already quite full.

Towards the end this video reminded me of that part from Bo Burnham's Inside: "Is it necessary that every single person on the planet expresses every single opinion they have on every single thing that occurs all the time? Can anyone, any ~single one~ shut the fuck up? And I know you're thinking 'you're not shutting the fuck up right now' and that's true, but-"

Not to mention so many essays are just a dude trying to make a pretentious birtish accent to sound "smart" when all they're really doing is regurgitating the same take that everyone already shared about the latest tv show and why it's "garbage" or a "masterpiece" while adding nothing new to the conversation.

Really makes you think this one

If you watch a video essay on someone's work, do you do it out of curiosity, to affirm that something is worth looking into, or to know just enough about to participate in discussions?

I found this to be incredibly insightful

There are several things in this video that contradict each other, such as you saying that people use essays as a means to quickly experience new things, later saying that people use them to indulge in things they're already familiar with. While both of those things can be true, there isn't a clear point being made if they are. It makes sense that the video only took 3 hours to make, ironically playing into what you discussed, although I think this was the intention. It ironically took me longer to watch the video than it did for you to write it because I was pausing it so I could focus on it and think about it.

The best video essays are always the ones that stand alone as their own piece of work. Jacob Geller doesn't synopsize an entire art piece, instead he takes bits and pieces of it to explain a broader, more impactful topic. I've never sat down and decided to experience a show after Pyrocynical steamrolled the entire thing into a 4 hour video, but I have experienced a lot of cool art just because a better essayist decided it would make a good footnote.

I think I must be hanging out in different parts of KZfaq than Fudj (or perhaps just the "average" user of KZfaq). I feel like this video essay criticizing video essays (heh) has many valid points, but if you don't like what you're being fed on YT, then seek out better things, and don't worry about the "average" userbase. I know that's easy for me to say, as someone whose career does not depend on views. But I don't really get any crap reaction channels or low-effort video essays recommended to me, and I really enjoy my little corner of KZfaq. I guess I feel like I'm being scolded for something I don't actually promote, or I'm listening to someone complain about a problem that I'm not contributing to. The repeated use of "we" throughout the video, as if we all know we're guilty, might be my issue. There's also just a hint of entitlement coming through, though I'm sure it must be frustrating knowing your job rewards lowest common denominator garbage, if you have loftier goals. I dunno, I'm just trying to get out my thoughts while generating a bit of engagement for a channel I enjoy.

On the scale of low effort content, video essays are FAR from the bottom in terms of effort, quality, and harm done. Also, yes I’ve consumed more video essays than I have played new games, but I’m not paying $60 for each video essay I watch. To compare the two in terms of the amount of payout they get per consumption is misguided.

great video as usual! but I think it should've been called something like What CREATORS get WRONG about VIDEO ESSAYS (gone wrong) (not clickbait)

great stuff :)

11:25 I beg too differ. I've seen many, many animators arise over the past couple years. It's different to how it was back then though.

You make my autism happy.

You know, watching this video as someone who does want to do something creative has lead me to the conclusion that your product and what you give back to people should be your primary focus. Games, movies, comics, etx excel in quality when there is something they want to say or provide to make it meaningful. The same should apply to video essays.

Imo its complete nonsense to watch a video essay on a work you haven't actually absorbed yourself. I never watch a video essay on something I haven't played/watched/listened to. You can't properly engage with the content and the opinions of the video creator if you have no personal reference base. My goal in consuming media is in part to be able to communicate with others, I don't think that's uncommon. You seem to somewhat acknowledge this mindset part way through the video, saying that people want to engage with what they're familiar with. So why throughout do you imply the people watching these essays are doing so in place of interacting with newly created media? That doesn't make any sense. Unless the implication is that most video essays are on older content? Its not incorrect to say there is a lot of content like that, but its also true that managing to do an in-depth essay on newer content is twice as optimized, especially for the audience your implying has yet to experience the media itself. Which becomes an ouroboros of an argument. It feels to me like your argument is "people want to engage with content and formats they're familiar with so they don't have to think and don't have to engage with content." What's more, when one of your arguments is "video essayist aren't creative and couldn't make better content then what they're criticizing" you are very literally just falling into a textbook ad hominem fallacy. You're debating against essayists, and not their essays. I find such tactics disrespectful to the idea of having an actual conversation. The idea that the only people who should criticize art are those who could do something better is an age old argument that has always been flawed, its been argued against countless times, and I would expect you to be familiar with that if you've put as much research into this video essay as you say that other's should into theirs.

So, I am not sure I am just a bit of an outliar here, but as far as I am aware, that is generally not how I _consume_ (I hate that this word is now commonly used for this) my media. There are two ways this usually goes for me: Either: I watch a video about a game I have not played before, however make note of it if I am interested in it while I go. If it's not my cup of tea I will probably stop watchin alltogether, it's not interesting to me. If I do like it however, I will make a mental note about it. I will not play it immedeately, but when the time comes that I need it, I will remember it and then play it. If I am highly sold on what I am seeing and hearing, I will also stop watchin immedeatly and eather buy it right away, or also wait for the right time. There are so, soooo many games that I would have never played, never even heard of, would it not be for a let's player or essayist, talking about it passionately and broadening my own horizon. Or: I am already enjoying a game. But I want more, to dive into it's world as long as I can, even if I am not playing it. So, I look for, once again, essays, let's plays, podcasts, whatever I can find. Only as far as I have gotten of course, I don't want to spoil the experience of discovery and the story for me. Of cource I also enjoy watching something familiar from time to time. I am sure I am also guilty of the things you said. And I did feel a bit offended while watching, so I am probably a bit biased. But I also think that we are a social species and like to talk about the thing we enjoy as well as dislike. Maybe I am projecting to much of me into this, but I wonder if the true issue is us being more and more isolated in _reality_, missing interaction with other people, that we just try to find this somewhere else. I know that is part of why I do it. Because I don't want to be alone. And as long as the video doesn't stop, I don't feel alone, or at least don't think about it. This got a bit rambly in the end, sorry for that, I wrote it as I went along. And no, my life is not as depressing as it might sound there in the end. ^^

Video Essayist using a mic on the shot (a big one or even worse the tiniest on the market) just to look more "professional". OMG give me a break

I dare you to watch my long boy and tell me I spent no time on it. Go on.

I once made a game, it was a very simple game with quite a few flaws. Someone joined my discord and posted a 20 paragraph 'review' that absolutely took longer to write than my game did showcasing every little possible flaw with the game and I just deleted the comment, banned them, then quit game development. If I ever start it up again i'm making an exploitive mobile game because my respect for the average gamer currently resides deep in The Nether.

the thing about the environment of the internet is that people are actively shamed for choosing to just enjoy themselves and create instead of becoming a media critic. what i mean by this is essentially just... cringe culture. similarly to the cuphead inspired game you mentioned, so many fans of things are picked apart and criticized for doing what they like; hell, if you ask anyone who calls the undertale fandom 'toxic' what the problem with it is, chances are they'll mention shippers. those are just people making derivative content based on what they like because they find it fun, but for some reason this isn't okay because it... doesn't happen in the actual story? this happens with everything in every fanbase, but i mentioned the undertale community and shipping specifically as an example since a good portion of the people saying these things are younger teenagers and children who are growing up surrounded by judgmental people. but even adults will treat people like they're subhuman for portraying their own unique interpretation of a character-- yes, i've spent all this time talking about derivative creations, but this is still creativity! everything out there is derivative in some way, just some people are more attached to the original than others (which can mean anything from a movie subconsciously inspired by shakespeare's works to someone doodling their favorite obscure character everyday). and on the flipside... everyone is expected to "critically consume media" in recent years. there are plenty of people who enjoy this, and i think they should keep doing what they do, but there is an alarming imbalance between the number of people who talk about the quality of creations and people who put their own spin on said creation (i'm pretty much reiterating the video here but oh well). you can only play zippo's fun world after you acknowledge how bad and awful it is and make sure all your friends know too. and if it's your favorite thing in the world? well that's just embarrassing, even though i know nothing about your history and why you like that thing. i don't think everyone should be obligated to be a critic, just like how not everyone is an artist or a composer. i think we all need to take a break and just enjoy things in a positive way, whether that means creating, consuming, or studying something to find things you like about it. life's too short to drown yourself in all this negativity :) [this has been a 5k word comment essay from your local nerd]

also what are you talking about there are scores of animators still on youtube? like literally my feed is full of them? deeply confusing point.

The thing about the merch topic… its the thing that makes me feel gross about iron pineapple and vaati vidya merch, because literally all their work is derivative, and I think they get permission from the creators and it is unique art… but its just vaati from Zelda and solaire from dark souls… or oscar but either way idk its weird. Even me I’ve got a damn zinogre avatar if I ever became a creator I would make it more personal but it would just be a zinogre that wears the caravaneer outfit from monster hunter, and I’d probably do fucking video essays and lets plays. Basically I’m trying to say I get why things are so derivative, it’s hard to actually be creative.

1:09 Watching this video right now, And for me, to answer this question, I think I play as much new media as I do video essays picking them apart, especially with the new advent of me owning a Wii U with CFW, allowing me to play LOTS of new games though uh... ahem... "Yo-hoing" In fact, just a few days ago, I have completed Metroid Zero-Mission

Maybe I've just gotten better stuff recommended to me, or I just get bored whenever something is just linearly describing another piece of media but, like, do people actually go and watch video essays recounting what happens in a game instead of playing it so they can talk about it?

this is also a video essay!

I swear, everytime there's someone talking about opinions like this, my mind always goes to Pokemon Scarlet and Violet. It's a game people like to dogpile on, make it a big thing to hate - make it feel like Gamefreak made a moral crime releasing a video game. Kinda like that Enchanted Portals, but worse because biggest media franchise in the world. I don't mean to rant about S/V, but I think there's something to think about in there?

VgDunkey when he makes a video shitting on a game and gets turned into a KZfaq legend (meanwhile the game's reputation gets dragged through the mud just because a single popular meme KZfaqr didn't like said game)

Nice job Mr. Fudj. I just wanted to say that I do believe Marble Hornets could still succeed today, as analog horror is still going strong thanks to Marble Hornets itself lol. Sometimes projects like those are bolstered by “content reviewers” as well.

7:19 I watched that video and now i wonder how many people have commented comparing you two lol

for fuck's sake Fudj, I LOVE you and your videos but PLEASE do at the very least some minimal research on the "attention span" misinformation - it's literally based on nothing from a Microsoft marketing slide and yet people parrot it as if it's true

I think u missed some points like what content do you condsider creative?

Excellent work as always. Thank you!

everyone needs to watch this video. This happens way too much where the click bait is just complaining but never offering advice to the work itself in a respectable way. key word "respectable".

8:01 - I'd put money on Jacob Geller having done this at least once.

ladies and gentlemen, the most underrated modern youtube video

A common argument I noticed you make a lot in this video is that “people are more likely to watch something they’re more familiar with” and like, yeah of course people are going to do that. How often do you see someone go out of their way to watch something they’re not interested in?

Addictions are addictive...

Good vid

I let KZfaqrs dictate my opinions on media for way too long, so this year I'm trying things I had a low opinion of in the past. Turns out Kung Fu Panda 3 is a decent movie after all!

It kinda irks me when it gets pointed out that most people just stay with what's familiar to them. I know for a fact that the only reason I'm a part of this crowd is because money. I fear buying anything I can't be 100% sure is worth my time cause if I mess up my financials I'm ultra screwed. If I had money I'd have so much variety I'm just poor and scared.

I have skipped Tiktok almost completely because I know it would be a disaster for my ADHD riddled attention span.

hey i maybe have left a very mean spirreted commend on the last video on the new chanel saying that anarchisme is an "l take". i have gotten interested in the consept do you have any recomendation on anarchist books?

Literally every video essay related to a nintendo game starts with the entire fucking history of the company, its asinine