Random AWACS: check ur HUD bro

first contact gave me ptsd

@@agatagalavotti7886 Shush bot

I swear that mission made most of my deaths in my first playthrough, lightning strike when I am in front of a mountain sucked

Bro i was about to say cuz i did that one stupid thundery mission with the F-35 like yesterday LMAO

In an environment where toilet seats run $8K a pop, I'm inclined to agree.

Well the repair bill was probably 30 million.

god forbid someone touches a conformal antenna without gloves on.... Thats expensive...

Cat A was solely for loss of life 'til those same accountants got involved. Tell me, what's the cost of placing passenger seats facing backwards vs their value WHEN an aircraft crashes? What should one expect to pay to defy gravity?

@@sorennilsson9742 1999 one B2bomber crushin in Croatia when be a struck by lightning over Serbia

Current takes ALL paths, just that the most amount of charge flows through the path of least resistance.

they take all paths available to them

not that simple, faraday cages also shield against em radiation . also, current flows through all available paths so your explanation needs a follow up.

Oh yes, the same way a gasoline engine is just a bunch of iron? Thank you for your deep insight!

Electrons take all paths available, it's just that most electrons will take the path of least resistance.

@@agatagalavotti7886 No

It was called the Controlled Impact Demonstration if you're curious.

The crash required more than four years of preparation by NASA Ames Research Center, Langley Research Center, Dryden Flight Research Center, the FAA, and General Electric. After numerous test runs, the plane was crashed on December 1, 1984. The test went generally according to plan, and produced a spectacular fireball that required more than an hour to extinguish. (wiki)

@@agatagalavotti7886 shut up about your fishermen fetish porn

@@ayoutubechannel921 It's a robot, it's not listening.

Indeed.

I thought that the moment I saw the thumbnail

Haha... that is ironic. The pilots unofficially call it the Panther or Fat Amy. I always thought it looked like a swimming penguin from the side😅

@@justinavery8664 the penguin part cracked me up lol

Because it is not true. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/kNqKgaWcsMqzZYk.html

Not only that, but the fear of falling, claustrophobia, etc. plays big part too.

@@TheRibbonRed Glide ratio. Multiple engines. Jetliner don't fall in 2021. They reach aerodynamic instability, explode, or have mechanical issues. You dont know how planes work, do you?

@@christophermccoy4605 I believe he was giving examples of some of the misconceptions

@@christophermccoy4605 why being so toxic dude, get life. You could still like kinda fall, you didnt even know what his interpetation is of falling right?

@@christophermccoy4605 "oh look at me, this guy is talking about phobias. Let me cure that with publicly known facts and call him an idiot!" Do try curing phobias of air travel with that. Psychologists have never succeeded [with that alone], but _clearly_ you think you're better, don't you?

12:03 Thank you, novapixel. I understand that ytbers want u to watch their entire video . But damn, sometimes a 30sec clip could do the trick...

That's the short answer from the government who's most expensive, complicated, and secret toy doesn't work in adverse conditions. What's the "WHOLE STORY" Nova? What's your take on the CIA producing content for news sources after TWA flight 800¿?¿ I don't recall them having authority on any matter On U.S. soil, aircraft related or not.

@@truthsRsung That is the "whole story". Why does there have to be more?

@@AureliusR Because people like stocking up government conspiracies which may or may not be true to start fights in comment sections.

@@AureliusR ....The initial reports in situations like this, from this source, have a "trend" to be false. It isn't rarely, or sporadic. Ask this question, If the OBIGGS was toast, after a lightning strike, what else was damaged? Is this component cherry picked by the lightning (as it's sworn enemy😘) or the smiling Press Rep. from the Armed Forces? When the public swallows the pill of a story like, "shorted wiring on a 747 caused it to EXPLODE!!!," without verbage like "Circuit Breaker" or "Flash Point", I am ashamed of my species. If you think a Boeing Electrical Engineer would design a circuit in an aircraft that wasn't protected, or could pass it past other Supervising Engineers, I am disappointed. To say the least. What's the Flash Point of aviation fuel? Because that how hot that wiring has to get for it to go boom. I don't trust reports made by anyone that pays people to write them, especially a government agency tasked with delivering death. I use my solid, yet limited knowledge of the physical world to apply to their narrative. If it matches up, I agree with it. I wouldn't be a responsible American if I did.

Falcons go down from bird strikes and warthogs lose landing gear to animals on the ground I guess, lol

😂😂😂

A-10 is technically Thunderbolt II F-35 Lightning II

@@michaelusswisconsin6002 Thunderbolt II? Guess it gets too loud and pilots crash it out of frustration

can't wait for the raptor then

I don’t want to end up in Wild West with no means of getting back either.

No kidding! People seem to have a hard enough time just driving on pavement .

​@jeffduncan9140, and yet air travel is still safer than land

He need to focus

@@prumchhangsreng979 oh I'm sure. That plane was rocking like crazy. I'm sure he was fighting it to get it to stay flat and level.

No such thing as luck. Lightening rods are out in place on fighter jets.

If you payed attention to that video, he said that was unusual. Lighting strikes aren’t uncommon, but injuries are. It had to do with the pilot keying up the radio as lightning struck

@@ShawnHinck ....How often does the pilot of an aircraft have to touch controls in the cockpit. The crap you believe?

There isn't room because "Safety" (or the illusion of it) wasn't considered in the design of the aircraft. Whether you care for the term "efficiency" or "performance," enhancements have come at the cost of Safety. Admit the root cause.

@@truthsRsung it wasn’t that he was simply “touching” the controls, it’s that the radio was physically keyed up the moment the aircraft was struck. If the crap you believe actually happened, we’d have a lot more aircraft having issues with being struck by lightning.

True, but the Japanese still launched lot of airstrikes In - and had the Japanese carriers did something similar as the Americans, they possibly could have lessened the punch they took at Midway.

i see. nice to read. i always hear only good things about the f35 from pilots , active service members and miltary analysts but sadly its all drowned out by the noise that is propaganda. all the issues with the jet just come with the territory, its new technology. read a comment before saying if social media existed in the 80s we wouldnt have planes 😹😹😹 how true that is

So can the F35 operates during thunderstorm like bf2042 gameplay

Thanks man.

@@navyseal1689 Yes.

Yeah, this is clickbait video. 80% of the video he talks about other aircraft

Empty just means no usable fuel for flight. The fuel tanks are always wet with some remaining fuel. They are never completely dry.

Kaboom?

​@@Srae17 Yes Rico, Kaboom

Also he very clearly said "almost empty" and talked about the small amount of fuel left in that tank. . .

@@emmanuelgeorge LEGENDARY REFERENCE

Guess lightning can strike twice in the same location

If it was called the "Lighting", it would be a fair assumption that it couldn't fly in sunlight.

I’m so glad someone said something. You my friend gave me a smile.

you are wrong, the flight you are referring to is air China flight 120, he is talking about a thai flight 114, a 737 that burnt while sitting on the apron.

@@battleship5555 you are wrong, the flight you are referring to is air China flight 120, he is talking about a thai flight 114, a 737 that burnt while sitting on the apron.

@@sidv4615 yep you right ı just check and that diffirent story

@@sidv4615 to each their own

Lightning is more dangerous than Lightning II.

so a lightning II strike can take out more aircraft than a lightning strike but a lightning strike can take out a lightning II its balanced

How f22 works perfectly fine but the f35 suck so bad

can't wait for Lightning 3, Tokyo Drift then edit, why didn't anyone make an Electric Boogaloo joke? it's literally perfect

@@navyseal1689 tbf the F22 also costs more than 3 times as much as the F35 per Unit

I want a pacific rim 3 lol tadara tadatara tada tada tada 🤣

Pacific rim😂😂❤️

I hope they will make a pacific rim 3, and I don’t care how everyone says the 2nd one was so bad

Nah, he's thinking "Man, these flies are annoying."

Lol even the military variants are so different they could be considered separate species

You became a training opportunity. Likely trying to get close enough to use EOTS to see if anything "interesting" was happening on board.

The OBIGGS has been sort of an ordeal because after the system was redesigned, a maintenance check found that the tubing got damaged so they put the restriction back in place. The video did address it but it was easy to miss. The damage in the Japan incident was not fully explained but the implication was that because the F-35 isn't a huge metal cage like other aircraft, there was no "Faraday protection" so there was damage even though they were still good enough to land.

@@ChucksSEADnDEAD ah so the redesign was a fail and not having Faraday protection was an oversight?

@@akita2438 I don't know if the redesign had a problem because it seems the issue was somewhere else, in the tubing. I'm not up to speed with the investigation and what caused the tubing to get damaged. There's no "oversight" per se, if you have too much exposed metal skin it stops being a stealth aircraft. The fact is that when non-stealth aircraft are pitted against stealth in exercises they get the floor wiped with them. There's just too much at stake to prioritize lighting protection when the aircraft can be repaired if hit by lighting, but there's no repair if they get split in half by a missile.

Yeah, this is just click bait. I'm going to ignore the channel.

@@gail_blue Yeah. 90% of the video has nothing to do with F35

Wow.

Just checked, it exists

Thanks. We checked "the box".

@@NotWhatYouThink Great! Thanks for the content

That one baffled me as well. My first thought was that it would be something like the "ground" in cars. Which is just the car body being used as a common negative. Which in the case of lightning protection in aircraft doesn't make sense. As that would only interconnect all systems, ensuring that the lightning would get to them all. Upon a little reading it turns out that grounding in an aircraft is about interconnecting the shielding used around signal wires to avoid electromagnetic interference. And as such has nothing to do with lightning protection. Critical systems are protected by separating their electronics, not tying them together.

So you can have air superiority against F35, just need a thunderstorm and any combatant aircraft capable of flying in said storm. Nice mil spec.

Basically any rain, stealth aircraft need to be repainted after taking mission

5-nautical*

Dude the F-35 can fly through thunderstorms just fine

@@youkofoxy Lightning is the least of your problems in a thunderstorm, tf?

It actually can fly through lightning just fine, and does so all the time. It just attracts it more due to its coating.

@@jonathanpfeffer3716 explain.

@@taskforce0584 New system called OBIGGS fixed danger from lightning strikes.

Weight

Wow, that's brilliant! It's almost like you watched the video

@@kamikaze1827 I only watched the first half🤦‍♂️

No... That is not the reason...

@Rosie Okay so you just stop by to talk trash with absolutely no point or case whatsoever. There is no fighter jet outside the US that is even close to a match for an F-35.

​@@Rosie-ty5hulmao no examples just "weak" Thanks for giving me a chuckle 👍

OMG I can't believe you spelled god like that. 😀

@@rick49 "God"

He wasn’t “told”. He’s under the impression everything is alright He can always say: “I wasn’t made aware”

@@andile5945 who wasn't told? Everyone in the industry who knew they were choosing saving money over addressing a known risk responsible for numerous crashes? Did you watch the video?

Takata air bags are a prime example of this. Every investigation has been lead by government or independent bodies. In fact Ford and Mazda PETITIONED to remove some cars from the recall because it would cost too much money. No care in the world that all of their cars from the 90s to 2014 had frag grenades installed 30 cm away from millions of peoples faces waiting to pop just because it was cheaper to make the airbag casings thinner with cheaper explosives. It took many deaths and thousands of injuries to get governments to FORCE them to pay the $100/airbag replacement. Poor multi billion dollar companies can't afford that :( but they'll happily charge you $500 to install mats in your car.

Attenuation is a very well known occurrence and radar operators are trained to look for it. Pilots, however are not trained to the same standard and also have many other things that they have to pay attention to.

Me who not so weirdly have watched NWYT videos like 5-10 times over and it's still not what I think.

They didn't disclose it im disappointed

That's a great scrabble word😄

F35? Passengers? Uhhhhhhhhh

... and for everyone else 0:00 😁

@@NotWhatYouThink You spent the first 12 min. of the video going through a history of plane crashes, to essentially say: "The F-35's system needs some more work." If you wanted to make a video about the history of plane crashes - thats fine. But alot of your videos have terribly click-baity titles - and the ones I've watched arnt actually very well researched. Im telling KZfaq to stop recommending this channel's videos.

@@p0xus not a bad thing though as these topics weren't covered in military aviation books. Great info

@@jayjay53313 Well the majority of the video wasn't about military aviation is the problem. It was about civil aviation. If you looked into civil plane crashes you probably would have already known the majority of what was said here.

Yet it got banned from flying in thunderstorms in June of 2020. And the incident in Japan (which was unrelated to the OBIGGS system) was in July of this year, a few months ago.

well but it ruins the stealth if hit once but if it gets hit a few more times sooner or later the rest of the craft will get problems if they get hit more then once in quick selection is when the real problems with the craft shows up by the way lightning likes to hit high and large metal objects like a lot more than once if its the path of least resistance! in fact it can do that so fast that in 5 seconds lighting would have hit a object like that 6-10 times at that point! even i don't think even a F-35 with just its newest anti lightning systems would be able to handle that much that quick! if that kind of rapid multi lighting strike where to happen even the F-35 OBIGGS would not be able to handle all of that without taking a bit of damage in the process and would require mandatory repair post mission if the F-35s stealth wasn't fully compromised at that point from thermal heat sencture from the point of the strikes on the planes frame did not completely give their prosion away from thermal imaging detection equipment! this bescue by the way any area directly hit by lighting can get VERY VERY VERY VERY hot witch is bad for the F-35 stealth against enemy thermal detection anyway is one more reason the F-35 should not fly in thunderstorms! this is bescue anything struck by lightning even in a small point that point would be VERY VERY VERY HOT anyway! and i mean hotter than the surface of the sun hot would be! that is like very easy for most new heat imaging military systems to spot quite far away! so even if the F-35 has fully proper scheduling against lightning strikes! it would however would still become a big easy to see target from thermal imaging for a good amount of time directly after a lightning strike from the heat at the point of the strike on the frame would nullify any way of hiding from thermal imaging detection anyway!

@@ashtiboy There's so much wrong with this

Static wicks are not an important factor in lightning protection.

The Report by the British Investigation into the ASK-21 lightning strike was sobering for someone who has qualified parts to Euro/FAA norms for direct strike tests. Nature packs far more of a whallop than our test facilities can simulate.

Why we made the video 😉

Well... It's not what you think

Sounds like a skill issue on your end