Glad to hear you enjoy our work. You are absolutely right about the dozen videos!

You might wanna delete this reply. The one above me

@@QurikyBark32919 just ignore them! These bots are not worth your time!

@@SmileyXY ThErE aRe ChIlDrEn HeRe. I’m saying it so the Karen’s don’t have to

@@NotWhatYouThink Russia and China be like, we won the Hypersonic race! X-15 meanwhile: hold my peroxide 😂

Ok that is funny. Dark as hell but funny.

@V i o n a💝 wtf?

@@cherrycoyote55 porn scam bots finally invaded youtube

@@TheGreatThicc again*

@@TheGreatThicc yeah but... but people... keep... clicking... them.... 😏

It's already discovered bro This guy only repeat these things

@@1moreredcoder Nah dude it takes a lot of work on doing these kind of stuff you'll know the hardships of A youtuber only when u are one I know it jst appreciate the Work he does. For it

@@1moreredcoder Typical unappreciative fatherless user

@@bestinblaise2369 Thank you. It's like anything else. Once you have some familiarity with any type of work, you develop and appreciation for the efforts that go into it, and the more you know, you appreciate it more. Otherwise we are just "repeating work", and the baseball/basketball player making millions of dollars a year is just "throwing a ball" 😉

@@1moreredcoder I guess you are from a nation that only have cheap Internet data and no appreciation for knowledge. Why did you even watched it? Just click on the video, leave a dislike and go away.

So the P-38 cannot fly on the moon, but moves at supersonic speeds at the same time 🤔

Is the speed of sound on the Moon zero or NULL though?

Makes sense

@@panda4247 NULL if it was 0 it would imply the possibility of sound or a number other then 0. The main reason being that there is no medium for the pressure/waves of sound to travel through.

@@outdated6129 exactly, that was my point :) that the speed of sound on the moon is not 0, because there is no sound in the first place

Attack on Titan reference... EREN YEAGER AND ZEKE YEAGER

@@vinyphoenix443 aot is more like a reference to yeager

And a complete arsehole who never recognised that Bell X-1 designs were stolen from the British.

Only his mom calls him charles

Brave. So many test pilots died.

For those who actually knew what happened absolutely, but apart from the personnel at Edwards and higher ups, most found out later because of the Cold War

And Chuck Yeager was never that guy.

🏆

Exactly Insane as I was literally just researching the air speed record planes including the x15 and NASA 73a like 5 mins ago on KZfaq lmao World is a small placr

Or we are watching you ... 😆

Bro this bot is everywhere

@@notsoblackandwhite9064 ik, and it’s annoying as heckin

No no, come back please, i open the door for you, you are invited to the sleepover

7:20 for those not sure where to find it

Hehe no need to stop! 😉 Thanks for the kind words. We also enjoy making these videos.

Wait, not what you think is a team of people?

While the wing of the F-86 was eventually copied from the Me-262, the Bell XS-1 was designed as a scaled up .50 cal bullet, not after anything the Germans had.

And Americans didn't share any data back. One way friendship. It was the same with nuclear research. Unidirectional transfer of knowhow.

@@DominikPinkas Yup, that happened a lot! Still, we surprised them with the Lightning intercepting their a-12 oxcart 😆 It's a shame we didn't push ahead with Megaroc and beat everyone into space. That was another British project stopped just as it looked viable. We're just a static US aircraft carrier with the tories in power and part of the European project with Labour in Power. I know which one i prefer for my kids future! 🇪🇺💶

@@Aengus42 I find it funny how a colony the British spawned in the end turned out to surpass them in many ways and kinda put themselves partly in charge in some way (limited obviously, but still). I admit not knowing shit about these unidirectional transfers of knowledge and research, but it sounds as if the US just says give us what we want or else :/

@@Dominik-ui1zn We, unfortunately, took the USA at their word about reciprocal technology sharing. We did better with the Romans even in this regard. Every couple of thousand years you find young, boisterous countries that don't realise that the best results come from teamwork, not skulduggery. You'll grow up... That is, if you survive a millennia or two.

Hmm, sounds like a habit given huawei, alstom, zte, and that brazillian oil company. There are no allies, just compliant and non compliant vassals

Wow, that is wrong in so many ways it probably set a record. First off the X1 is hardly a "clone" of the Miles M52, I mean that thought right there goes to show that opposed to doing the research and learning from credible sources you learn from KZfaq comments and then just repeat them. First off the X1 was not a clone of anything except the nose proportions being a clone of the .50 caliber bullet, that's even mentioned in this video. And despite the false narrative that the British invented the flying tail which comes from the cry babying rantings of an English test pilot who spent the rest of his life finger pointing simply because he was mad that it wasn't him who got to break the sound barrier the fact is the French invented the flying tail back in the 1920's, it was already old news in the aircraft industry well before the X1 or the Miles M52 was even a blank sheet of paper. And if you look into the history of research into breaking the sound barrier you'll find out that research had started in the US long before WW2 started, several universities working with NACA had already been working on it for some time when it was suspended due to the war, it was information from that research that was given to Bell Aviation as a starting point to design the X1. Furthermore the X1 was built from day one with provisions to be easily converted to a flying tail should their testing and research deem it necessary, they started out with a conventional tail because in the world of aircraft development you start with what you know and go from there, one step at a time. Because the structure inside the tail of the X1 was built with the provisions to convert it to a flying tail such as having a place to mount the pneumatic jackshaft that raises and lowers the tail already inside the structure it was easily converted to one without a major redesign of the structure and framework inside the tail, if not for the fact that it was designed to convert the tail to the flying type the X1 never would have broken the sound barrier until 1948, having to do that much redesigning would have pushed it into 1948.

Look up the definition of clone. It most certainly wasn’t a clone.

from my knowledge it is Lazer guided supersonic missle and it is called wave rider because it stay near the ocean to cause sea skim to avoid aa

Doesn't matter if an airplane can or cannot take off on the moon, there is no atmosphere which would making breaking the sound barrier impossible. Also, the X-1 itself was incapable of taking off and was dropped from the B-52 after reaching operating altitude.

@@daexion Sorry but you are missing the forest for the trees here. The video had just talked about engines *that do not need atmospheric oxygen* and then goes on to talk about how the lack of an atmosphere (yes yes trace gasses) means you cannot take off. That is ALL I was talking about in my first paragraph. Note that I did not say a thing about velocity here. Also in response to what you said about the air launch. What does this have to do with anything I said? Besides that, do you have math to back up what you are implying here? That being, on the moon you would also need to air launch an X-1. Again not that this has anything at all to do with the point I was making, but it is an interesting question given the differences between Earth and Luna.

The XS-1 wasn’t capable of taking off at all. It was dropped from a B-29!mother ship and had enough fuel for only one burn.

@@Frankie5Angels150 Please reread what I said. You obviously misunderstood what I said as well as missed the point. (not to mention that the X-1 is being used as an example as much as it is being used in and of itself)

Nothing can fly super sonic on the moon because there is no sound barrier

The moon has no atmosphere though

That would be a very expensive kamikaze attack.

Probably not very. Kamikaze had a very low success rate without bringing experimental planes going at hard to control speeds.

Glad you like them!

Cannon balls broke the sound barrier hundreds of years before that. What’s your point. We’re talking controlled level flight. Not a ballistic platform

For the most part, all sponsors give you a bunch of bullet points and some directions on what not to say. For example they say “Include a specific example from one of the courses” or “do not use profanity”. Then the creators would write a script based on those talking points and guidelines and try to integrate it into the main script of the video.

Not quite true, he did regain control after a bit but ended up upside down at supersonic, and his dampers locked; refusing to let him pull out of the dive so the plane began oscillating (which was far beyond the limits and the plane broke up) incredible that he pulled out of a Mach 5 spin tho

I stand corrected, your Majesty

I never seen that the x-15 could be considered until I saw that some people were debating it and then I thought about it if we include the x-15 why not virgins galtic rocket or the space shuttle, they all have rockets, use rockets, and land in a similar manner(he even said the x-15 heavily influenced and gave rise to the space shuttle).

@@apex_blue you mean the X-15 rather than the X-51 right (the X-51 is a hypersonic missile)

@@HighCalibr yes sorry I will correct it