Absolutely. You really feel like a lone wanderer. That's why I was so amazed (in a bad way) by Fallout 76. For me, Fallout is supposed to be a solitary experience. 76 seemed like the antithesis of Fallout 3.

Yeah, I hate artificial loneliness, but the music and radio and enemies keep good company.

Yes Fnv nearly nailed it but They only managed to make a big empty Dessert in the end

@@kiobio7311 it has more locations and quests than f3 so that’s not true

@@koeyguilbeau443 yes it is. All e

exactly my thoughts too im glad he made this video

Excellations: >Post Apocalyptic survive or die in a world of pain >Great DLCs, as good as new vegas based in their own right but more loosely connected, short but sweet. (Excluding zeta) >You can go anywhere you want at the start of the game >World building not as good as new vegas but still rewarding to explore the world more so than fallout 4 imo >successfully integrated VATS in a 3D shooter (not easy to accomplish) >they didn't shit all over the lore yet with retconns and even though the west was developing they still tried their absolute damndest to explain why the east coast was in such a state so the OG fallout 1 and 2 fans got to get drawn in and experience the post apocalypse in 3D

@@thepaleone6960 same

@conartist j countering your counters. -"everything is easy from moment 1" depends on difficulty and how good you are at fps games and the like in general. i struggled first time around, but once i got the hang of it i barely had to use VATS even. i am absolutely certain most people feel that way. -Operation Anchorage was great as it gave a look into pre-war american mentality, how the war on the ground would have gone down, the technological differences between the chinese and the americans and the role of heavy armored infantry in the war. It also gave you some cool gear. Point Lookout also delved into aspects of pre-war america, primarily with its prison camps and with the questline about the chinese spy. It also had some fun hallucination bits that did actually pertain to the player character and their experiences. It also went deeper into the widely enjoyed Dunwich mythos that fallout 3 and onwards has steadily built on. Mothership Zeta and the Pitt were however very "meh", that i will agree on. Broken steel i wont even acknowledge, as that was a blatant attempt by Bethesda to force players to buy DLC just to get a proper ending. -plenty of open world games that absolutely fail at the open world part. Just look at Ubisoft's most recent entries into the open world category. Fallout 3 had memorable locales and did reward exploration with easter eggs, settlements, quests and loot. Whilst not something that should be lauded as revolutionary, being successful at providing fun is good enough on its own. -Why arent you people complaining about the lack of talking Deathclaws? Lets face it. Fallout 3 and onwards might as well be a different timeline all things considered. But to say that Bethesda hasnt injected anything interesting into the franchise would be a blatant fucking lie. Otherwise you wouldnt have Obsidian jump on the chance to make fallout new vegas using the same engine and even have some of the plot points and shit. There is a reason why New vegas blows outer worlds out of the water. -"why does it look like the bombs just fell after 200 years" Because DC is a battleground between several warring factions fighting over buried government secrets, weapons and technologies. there is also the theory that the nukes used on DC were radioactive rather than explosive nukes, used specificly to induce long term harm.

​@@boarfaceswinejaw4516 Countering your countering counters: - The game rewards you with a 1hko weapon for simply following the main quest. Of course you can find difficulties in certain areas, but let's be honest, it's not too difficult and there is not a lot of variance. New Vegas went beyond just Energy weapons and Ballistic, adding armoured targets and the ability to use different types of ammo for added effects. - Operation anchorage? You mean the on rails simulation that serves as limited world building? It was mediocre, giving good rewards for not a lot of effort. Point lookout was decent, had a different atmosphere, I'll give you that. Broken Steel fixed the game's crap ending and should have been included with the base game. It was a sloppy fix to something that shouldn't have been broken. The Pitt? Actually had some decent world-building in the use of Troggs and a moral choice, only to fall flat on the escaped slaves who literally want you to steal a child with no long term reason to do so. - Open world? Sure it is. Is it meaningful and does it help to establish a believable setting? Not really. The only two factions making any effort to branch outside of their own little hovels are the Brotherhood of Steel (who were completely butchered in their pre-established lore), and the Enclave (who are cartoon villains with no sympathetic through line). The world may be open immediately, but who cares how wide the ocean is if it has the depth of a paddling pool. What interesting locales are there really in Fallout 3? I struggle to think of any that could match those seen in the Mojave. Does anything beat the spectacle of Helios One? How about the Strip (even though it was still fairly barren)? What about Novac and Hidden Valley? The world felt alive, and not dwelling on the great war as if it happened yesterday. - The world is contradictory, how are these people eating? Do they eat wild-life or vegetation? Where is the vegetation to feed the livestock and the people? New Vegas believably showed farmsteads and the sustainability of the world. 200 years and there being no progress? I mean, it's been less than 100 years since the Blitz, Hiroshima and Dresden, yet all of these places have been restored almost completely. 200 years is more than 6 generations of people, and you're telling me all of them were happy squatting in the bombed out remains? Again, compare this to New Vegas, where communities form in the shell of the old world, but still build upon it. The NCR? Slowly reconquering America. House? He's using his money and business sense to reform the barbarous tribes of New Vegas, and if the ending cards are to be believed, he prospers. The Legion? While regressive, they have a unifying culture under Pax Romana. Fallout 3 should have been set far closer to the bombs dropping to make sense. - The best thing Fallout 3 did was to breath life into the franchise once again, and I don't hate Fallout 3. It was my first game from the series, but just because I have nostalgia for it does not mean it is not flawed. It's was outclassed by New Vegas and it's predecessors. Bethesda did a great job making the game feel modern and helping it to meet up the the contemporary gamers mindset, but it did this at the expense of retconning core aspects from the original series. It's a 6/10 game which people have fond memories of, that's the extent of it.

so this game has very little in terms of good stuff and will need a mountain of content to be considered a 'Perfect' game in your eyes?

Fallout 4 had terrible gunplay though, bullets wouldn't even register at a certain distance let alone you fired sponges at your enemy

​@@DownsquadMost games need a mountain of content to become perfect. But, most games also aren't good enough to create controversy that leads to our discussion

@@timarmesto2685 What I meant was that the game needs a lot to be considered perfect s it is not close, sorry for confusion

@@Downsquad Yeah. I understood what you meant.

Having not yet gotten to any of the DLCs, I'm planning to do three others first and saving that one to be the last thing before Broken Steel, because all of the others interest me so much more. Anchorage is beautiful and blue after an entire game of uninterrupted gray and brown, Mothership Zeta is gonzo insanity in space, and the Pitt is a genuine moral dilemma where freeing slaves is arguably the wrong choice, but there isn't really a right one. Compared to all that, brain surgery in a pseudo-bayou just doesn't excite me as a concept, so I intend to do only a little of that before unleashing Liberty Prime and leveling my main to 30.

​@@quicksilvertongue3248 Alright.

If it wasn't the only one with a regular open world then no one would have this opinion.

@@nathanlevesque7812 I do not understand your comment, can you explain exactly what you mean?

@@quicksilvertongue3248Broken Steel maps are linear. Mothership Zeta, Operation Anchorage, and most of the Pitt are linear. You can't just walk around in every direction there but you can in Point Lookout, and that's really all it has going for it.

It's such a monumental moment. Thanks so much!

Same here. One of the most amazing post apocalyptic world's ever.

I’m pretty sure fo3 was the introduction to the series for probably 80% of fallout fans

Yeah!

i 100% agree, it feels foreboding. and i know this is unpopular but i love the metro system, how fun would 3 be if you could simply walk the whole streets of dc, navigating the metro system the first time was kinda scary. opening a door and hearing a ghoul somewhere in the halls scream, like shivers down your spine.

Definitely underrated bc it annoyed people, like Dead Money. @@demonpride1975

And 1,2 and New Vegas wasnt ?

@@chrisandreas3142and this is relevant how?

The bee's knees

​@@MrHammersthe dogs' hogs

I've just recently finished Fallout 1 for the first time (I had played it sporadically before) and I absolutely agree on the atmosphere, Fallout 3 is the one that most closely captures that feel.

There's so many little moments that catch you off guard and make an impact in the game. Everything BUT the main plot really 🤣. I love that everyone has a unique story like this on the capital Wasteland

@@MrHammers Yoo, you are right. The main plot is just... well, everytime i play FO3, i just ignore it until i want just to start Broken Steel. Bethesda writing for both FO3 and FO4 main plots, its just garbage.

@@SolidusGriloShow it's really not garbage at all to say that's way too far fetched.

@@jefferyflood it's not. they are utter garbage. nobody except of a hand full of weirdos cares for the story in 3 or 4.

Indeed. FO3 had a super realistic plot lmfao. Fallout 4 was basically Blade Runner the videogame. Not as realistic butttttt still somewhat fascinating

Yeah, unbelievably bad and broken.

I'm gonna stop you right there. There was no new Vegas at the time, nor the shitpiles that are fallout 76 and 4. Fallout 3 is Legendary. LEGENDARY. Bugs and the desolation of the Capital wasteland are what made it what it is.

@@WingsChairThey ain’t even bad just different

​@@dongvermine NV was worse when it was released, which is hilarious since Obsidian didn't need to make the game engine OR the assets.

@@Antonyt13 wrong entirely

Thank you man, glad you enjoyed it. I totally agree on Andale the first time I discovered that place I was spooked, the slow burn of uncovering the unsettling community was just fantastic

Yeah there are plenty of hate videos out there and I don't really get it, it's a great game, and the capital wasteland alone was worth loving the game. Thanks dude

@@MrHammers 3 is a great game. My favorite is nv because the narrative to me is better and I love the dlcs and how connected they are to the main story and each other. OWB is my favorite dlc of any game I have ever played

I really don't get the Fallout 3 hate. I guess it was an easy way to get views.

When NV came out, I’ll never forget the feeling of disappointment (specifically because of the map and factions) especially when I got to NV to find it nothing like the ruins of DC.

@@JAK-oi2wu the factions in nv are leagues better than fallout 3. The atmosphere is different though I’ll agree there

Before this video I hadn't played it several years, I had a blast hopping back in it

Same

Try the first two.

Same! I listened to every voice log, read all the terminals, I was obsessed with the game when it came out

i know there are people who think 3 is a good game, and i will never understand them. it was the first game of the franchsie for me and i got bored after 20 min of exploring. the main quest is not worth mentioning, so exploring and finding side quests is the only thing left. but if u don't know how to find the side quests, because u just startet the game, and the exploration bores u to death because there is no reason to explore at all and 90% of buildings are just meaningless dungeons with enemies and loot, then there is literally nothing left.

People preferring New Vegas makes sense. People preferring 4 does not.

​@wruzzer a lot of people can't hack the lack of endorphin triggers. It's the reward of seeing new stuff slowly learning more about the world. As for the main story if purifying the water in a world where everything you consume kills you isn't anything to shout about you're an idiot

​@@clydemarshall8095Gunplay, settlement building. Not my cup of tea personally, just saying it definitely is for others.

They can get far better instances of both in other games. Being the Fallout with the best gunplay doesn't mean the combat is good. @@celestinoledesma8395

How does New Vegas, a game with more locations, more quests and more factions feel emptier than Fallout 3?

@@SpartanMJO12 Because the actual environment does not feel as populated. Because far more of FNV's locations have no reason to visit, and lack even interesting presentation. More quests and factions don't mean much when they tend to be either less interesting in many cases (quests) or less present in the world (factions). The factions in NV feel like they don't exist anywhere but their own strongholds. Outside of them, you maybe run into a 3 man patrol once in a blue moon. This made sense in F3, where the main factions were explicitly low in number and stretched thin, not so in NV, where they are, lore-wise, supposed to be everpresent. The exploration aspect of Fallout 3 is a LOT stronger because of both density and the fact that pretty much every building you can explore DOES have some form of interesting to it, some form of 'story' to the location that brings it a reason to exist. FNV? Not so much. FNV has one or two dense interesting areas, the occasional standalone interesting area, and a bunch of rather empty space, dotted with random uninteresting caves and shacks.

@@jtnachos16 you put into words my thoughts wxactly

Yeah, exploration is one of the few things NV does really poorly. But I’d be willing to bet that was in-part due to both the 18 month development time as well as just the setting. I’ve been replaying both 3 and NV recently and while I’ve absolutely been loving both of them, it’s kind of a slog exploring places in NV, in NV the only places that I actually like diving into are the abandoned vaults, outside of that it’s just kinda meh. 3 does it leaps and bounds better.

@@Sev3617 disagree. 3 had a bunch of buildings, but 90% of them were meaningless boring dungeons with enemies and loot. in nv, 90% of the locations have a quest tied to it.

Andale! Yeah that is one of the best side stories going on.

One of my favorites, too. Something about Fallout 3 that I absolutely loved was all of the bizarre "what the hell" moments, where something humorously weird was happening and you were struggling to understand it, like the Leave-it-to-Beaver VR simulation, or tripping balls in Point Lookout. It feels much more gimmicky in New Vegas with the Wild Wasteland perk, like finding two charred skeletons named Owen and Beru, or a fedora clad corpse in a refrigerator as an obvious nod to Indiana Jones. Those things aren't strange or interesting, they're just movie references.

Nothing in all the fallout game titles has ever thoroughly creeped me out more than the Gary vault.

Going into the Gary vault blind was terrifying. I had no idea wtf was happening

@@MrHammers oh dude in another vault there is one man with crates of puppets and that's it. AND from the lore that's said he went so insane the 1st person that came exploring he scared them off with mental instability. Good thing they didn't put that vault in the game that would have made the gary clone vault look like a cakewalk. But I would say if your creeped out by the gary vault. Wait till fallout New Vegas with the all plant mutated people vault. Very creepy and they come from everywhere and hide very well.

I'm biased as well, it was my first fallout game, but even after playing all the others it stands as my favorite

@@MrHammers agreed. Ive played all of them and I really enjoy the other games. Put more time than I wanted to admit into 4 and NV but 3 will always be the best.

I wanted to fall in love 4 like I did with 3 and NV but I just couldn't. I still enjoyed the hell out of it but I don't look back it fondly like 3 and NV

@@MrHammers Fallout 4 is like meeting a new girl who looks exactly like an ex but can't compare

🤣🤣

Lol it would be quite the experience being young enough to have this game scare you

meanwhile i don't even remember a single person in megaton, even tho i tried to play it again like 4 months ago. not a single face, not a single name, not a single quest except blow up megaton or diffuse the bomb. why? because the whole city felt unbelievable to me. why would they waste so much energy on a fancy gate? why are they building a city around a bomb that's still active? where do they get food from? not a single interesting character in the entire city. that's when i realised why i stopped playing it the first time. the whole world is like megaton. it makes no sense. i know in other places there are interesting characters, but u have to wander through a basically empty map. empty because the buildings are just meaningless dungeons with enemies and loot. it feels like a chore to do them, not like fun, because there is no motivation to do it. u don't need better gear or weapons because u can kill a deathclaw at lvl 1 with the starting gun. in my opinion u only had the feeling of adventure and exploration because u were young enough to not care about all the flaws this game has. i loved some bad games as a kid too. not fallout 3 tho, this one was always boring af.

Did you play Fallout 1 and 2?

Stalker is a great comparison for sure! Both games have dangers and an unsettling vibe the whole time you're exploring. Capital wasteland truly is the GOAT

You shouldn't have been, it's a special game for sure, same with new vegas

back when the games came out, most people actually preferred fallout 3 to new vegas. they found the new vegas world bleak and it was annoying how you couldn't join a single faction in the entire game. there's a certain point in history that a very vocal minority began to over glorify new vegas

@@zekun4741 I remember when it first came out the biggest talking point was its technical issues, For me the 2 things that bugged me about it was the fact that it had no post ending gameplay (though that was due to time restraints so I can understand) and the Legion with its Roman aesthetic, I just found them to be a bit of a downgrade to the power armour wearing Enclave, the whole army with ragged/ancient looking attire just didn't really appeal to me

@@zekun4741 that’s because fallout 3 world building is terrible.

I love new Vegas, but it just didn’t give me that same sense of dread that the capital wasteland offered. In fo3 I could get lost in the world, but there some things about new Vegas that kind of were immersion breaking and ruined the atmosphere.

@@christopherjohnson9167 I get you as a classic fallout fan because The dread of fallout 1 got lost in 2 but fallout 2 is still my favorite classic fallout and new Vegas is still my favorite

FO4 isn’t a bad game. It doesn’t do what rpg nerds want but it’s not a bad game. Doesn’t scratch everyone itch and that’s fine, but to say they’re trash is just no. 76 though yes was hot trash. It’s meh now.

@@Nopers_ I don't think anyone is claiming it's a bad game. I think it's more that fans see it as a bad Fallout game because it lacks a certain depth that we've been accustomed to through the previous entries. I pre-ordered the pipboy edition and played the absolute shit out of it in its first years, but I can't replay it. Even after putting 300+ hours in one playthrough, doing every single quest, finding every secret, I just can't get into it again god knows I've tried. There's just something that was present in the previous games that I didn't get in FO4, I can't say exactly what it is but it's absolutely a different type of Fallout game

I play SimSettlements 2, which overhauls FO4 into the empire-builder it was supposed to be. FO4 had a lot of great ideas that were never finished, it tried to do too much at once and gave us only a taste of awesome and always left us wanting more, simply because it was IMPOSSIBLE to give us everything. E.g., Silver Shroud costume? Hell yeah! I just get to ham it up as a superhero for the entire quest, and by the end, I actually feel like a superhero! But then, that's it. Barring maybe one or two scenes from the DLC, nothing else, I can't continue hamming up the whole world as the Shroud.

disagree. fallout 4 is a much better game and even a much better fallout game than 3. it's still a bad fallout game, don't get me wrong, but in comparison to 3... new vegas is the only real 3d fallout game to this day. 4 is a decent game, but a bad fallout game. 3 is just trash.

Refreshing take

Perfectly put! Of course in retrospect we can nitpick this game, but there is a reason it's one of the highest rated games in the franchise

Could you give me a condence list of what sucks about it? Im planning on buying it. I dont have to much time so it will be my only fallout game ill go through.

@@zydian_ 3 shares many problems with other open world Bethesda games, some writing, exploration, characters, etc. Overall it's a good time, but ymmv

@@crono276 exploration is fun and rewarding and there are many interesting characters, madison li, Harold, your father the overseer of the simulation vault. Etc. writing has its moments at being Poor and cutting corners but for the most part it is fine with some absolute gem moments, Harold, point lookout the Pitt, etc.

i didn't. i got bored after 20 min of exploration. the only fun i had with 3 was modding the shit out of it to get rid of most of the flaws that destroy the game, like the enemy difficulty or the missing ads feature.but i couldn't change the story, so the game was still utter garbage and it is to this day.

Well said my man! This really was a video I've wanted to do since starting the channel, it feels good getting it out there. You're right F03 and New Vegas are so close yet so drastically different, I'm glad to see in these comments people.love both for what they are, no reason to hate on the games. Thanks for the comment homie 🙏. And, Ubisoft is trying Thier best at keeping assassin's Creed banging but I still think Far Cry 3 is the Pinnacle of thier catalog haha

It's part of the experience sometimes haha

It's good to see so many people that love this game. Thank you!

those r ingame time hours

I liked Fallout 4 a lot, but the dialogue options killed it for me tbh. I did love the Commonwealth a whole lot though

Fallout 3 and 4 were nostalgic, but I don't Reeeeeeeaaaaally like NV Because whenever I play it, I have bad luck in real life, and I don't like it, although the game itself is amazing

Me too and I started playing FNV first, I was not feeling it when I was younger (Or because of the Cazadors I met after getting out of the Doc's place LMAO) Some of my friends keep pushing me to play NV, tried again there was something about the environment I just didn't like. Might try again in the future. Then I tried Fallout 3...LOVED IT yeah the main story was not that great but I do think that was the point because the atmosphere and exploration were what the game was trying to push (I think). Seeing how a big city and capital looked after the war was a plus.

@@RikaRieGaming yeah, I mean, I like NV and it has some good memories behind it with me playing it, it just, something is off about it, it just doesn't click, I dunno, but I love the main story of FO3, the dad is cool, but I love how your main character is only 19, and he (The Lone Wanderer) is like, the most badass kid ever, and yes, the capital wasteland is such an AMAZING Map!! It's fucking awesome, and I know the map of fallout 4 like the shaft of my penis, I don't even need the HUD to get around, it's just that the capital wastes are so scattered and everywhere, but very memorable, same with fallout 4s map, except, I just know the Commonwealth REALLY well hahaha 🤣

@@RikaRieGaming bethesda stopped caring about story after oblivion, and that is the main reason why fallout 4 and skyrim have such poor writing and basically no choices in quests. fallout 3 had some weird choices in the main story and some actually interesting choices in the sidequests, but it already showed they don't care anymore because "doesn't matter how good your story is, the players will shit on it anyways". yeah... no. some players, maybe, but not the majority. start caring about stories again and your games might become enjoyable without mods, like new vegas.

The factions were so well written and implemented in NV, probably my favorite aspect of the game. I love both games, it's the just the world of F3 that is better to me personally. Thank you dude!

Damn that's impressive! No idea what my hours are at but I doubt it's close to 1000

i have like 2k in new vegas, 1k in 4 and 1 hour in 3 because it's trash. after 20 min of exploration i got bored because there was nothing interesting to see at all and then i started modding it, but even then i didn't like it. glad i picked up new vegas nontheless, otherwise i would still think the fallout franchise has no good games. now i played 1, 2, nv and 4 and can confidently say, 3 is by far the worst out of the entire franchise. people shit on the story of 4 and i agree, but it was still so much better than the story of 3. the atmo gets destroyed by poor world building, the buildings are 90% meaningless dungeons with enemies and some loot, the story is not even worth talking about and the rpg and shooter elements are poorly executed, so all in all the game is garbage. how can anyone like this? it deserves a solid 1 on metacritics. there is nothing good about the game. well, that's not true. there are some good quests. but to find them you have to explore the whole boring af map if you don't know where they are.

Thank you! Yeah it's not a perfect game but it does so many things so well that it deserves to be praised for what it accomplished. Same as you it also inspired me to play FO1 and FO2 as well as the sequels and play through all those great games. Glad you liked the video, appreciate it my dude

fallout 3 almost stopped me from playing nv. glad i did, otherwise i would think to this day that the entire franchise is garbage. i can even enjoy 4, but 3? hell nah. that game was just a shitshow.

I felt the same way about Outer Worlds, I really wanted to love that game and completely agree. Also I agree with the statement that each fallout is marginally in line with the others and each excel at certain things where others don't, very well said!

Ah, it you forgot the most important game to understand why F5 will be bad: F76

@@FumblsTheSniper that doesn’t make sense. They can make a good fallout even with that game and it’s actually not as bad now as it was

@@samjohnson1992 just go melt more crayons in your easy bake oven, I care even less that you like to be spit on less over time.

@@FumblsTheSniper jeez Bro why all fallout nv fanboys are all toxic?

what feeling? the only feeling i get is that bethesda tried but failed miserably, because they didn't care for story or believable world building. the only good thing about 3 is that we got nv.

​@@wruzzerI mean you're probably just stupid. You actually took a literal small nation vs morons in football gear that got btfo by a few sniper rifles seriously. On top of the other options being the nothing route, and Walt Disney. If any of that sounds smart or believable it's not because the writing is good, it's because your not too keen on paying attention to the main plot. It's almost like every fallout has had an incredibly dumb and unrealistic fantastical plot.

Great choices! The Lovecraft vibes from Dunwhich are just perfect

Agreed. New Vegas is definitely better but in it's own way. The plot is linear making the player go through the same path to New Vegas, which works really well for that game, but I like how Fallout 3 pushes the player to explore the capital wasteland and find shit to do. I hate when people say 3 has no world building because as you explore the wasteland, you become immerse in the DC ruins getting information from random npcs. Both games are great and people who act like 3 is somehow horrible because of a bland story and exclusion of a few NV features just havent played 3 enough.

New Vegas might be my favourite, but I would never put someone down for liking 3 and 4. They were both awesome.

Fallout 3 is good 4 is bad

@JK I think it depends, as it does everywhere

@JK fair

Fallout 4 is for man children the maturity in that game is horrendous

There are some great games with amazing atmosphere but the capital wasteland is just untouchable

Agreed, if you look at the backstory it doesn't make too much sense for it to look that way, but it's not something that broke it for me

ok i love this game too but the story is horrible, F3 only true weak point

@@Badookum why do you believe the story is bad, i find very good actually and i find it believable that the Wasteland is such chaos

@@TheGoldenMan888 because your father kills himself for no reason. because u have almost no choices, and if you have, they are just "be the ultimate bad guy" or "be the ultimate good guy". because it's short af. just a few examples.

Same here. I did all of the main story and side quests over 10 years ago, just got back into playing the game and I still feel like a I'm finding new things. There's just something so engaging in Fallout 3's exploration as you snoop through the maze of doors and alleyways in DC.

same here i love the game to death but yah Fnv is objectively better as its well Fallout 3 but more but F3 holds its own very well as itself and get uneeded hate. 76 was shit at launch but it somehow did a No Mans Sky, F4.... dont get me started thats a whole different mess

Thanks for waiting on it haha thanks my dude

Thanks! Enjoy it!

they did a pretty bad job. nv is so much closer to 1 and 2. 3 feels like someone tried, but didn't understand what made 1 and 2 so great.

Well said!

because the story is garbage, the world building is garbage, the difficulty is garbage, the shooting is garbage and the rpg elements are garbage.

the explo in nv and 4 is much better, what are u talking about.

The plot in new Vegas was undercooked, brotherhood of steel just leeched off the other factions, the legion didn't have any significant locations, the raiders basically didn't have a story.

​@@wruzzer4 had hardly any memorable locations and new Vegas' highlight was the strip. Which you could walk across in 20 seconds. The place was about the size of megaton. You're the reason we have shit like fallout 76

Yeah, most the videos that bash it look back on the game in retrospect and can nitpick it a lot, but when that game came out it was unreal

Yup. Honestly the critics of this game are flat out wrong about a lot(and have a few valid criticisms mixed in). This is a fantastic game, and unfortunately a select group of people have ruined the perception of it..