Lmao. Wonker.

Disney Ceos when they can add a black lesbian to a childrens film.

Don't wonk too hard you'll run outta nuts

💀💀

Bruh 💀

Totally agree how the Depp version was closer to the book. But, what Depp missed that Wilder had was magical.

This

Okay but Gene had an interpretation of the character that will be forever the most looked up upon. May be that Dhal did not want people to think Wonka's character had malice and was some kind of a villain, but the movie did a lot better in my opinion giving him that kind of personality and actually telling something with the story

Just like the movie _Return to Oz_ was more like the books than the original movie, but people hated it because it was too dark. The _Wizard of Oz_ books are quite dark.

Accuracy doesn't make something good though.

His mother must be very proud!

Truly amazed by that fact that he’s the first american to work on a wonka video

I believe that he has a 7ft Waterfall. the problem is that at nights, he has to go to the bathroom

@@MB-eh2kp he worked on it in his wonka room :)))))

He is a real Saint

That's what the book was like

call cap on the non fatal part. pretty sure that fat kid got type 3 diabetes

That's why I don't like the original. Charlie isn't any better than the other kids, but he gets away with it.

That's why it's better than the crappy 1971 version.

That movie was trash

2005 version kicked ass. Underrated movie.

This!!! And the songs, oh my god. People who haven't read the book don't know that Danny actually used the original lyrics from the Oompa Loompa songs for the songs of the movie... the man is a genius!! And using real squirrels??? I mean, come on! Even the sets were magnificent, it feels real. When I read the book after years of having watched the original movie and the 2005 adaptation, I ended up convinced that the 2005 film made far more justice to the book than the 1971 version, and Roald would've actually liked it better. He really disliked Willy Wonka and The Witches.

@@myBquest exactly. So much better than oOmpA lOoMpa DoOpEDy DoO

I'm kinda biased towards this one cause I grew up on it.

How old are you guys that watched this when you were kids? I'm curious if the bias is dependent on you having experienced the depp version first. I'm a 36 year old millennial. And there's just no topping Gene Wilder. He just is Wonka. And the songs are iconic. The 2005 just did not have the heart of the original and being more loyal to the book and showing the backstory of the characters did not really add depth to the story. But I do not believe everybody has to like everything all the same. I miss the era of movies when they were not all made to be a huge blockbuster.

Nah, Moon is way too homophobic to collab with even that piece of trash.

Tommy Tallarico.

@@redlightmax Who's Tommy Tallarico?

@@redbulbuniverse Video game music composer and sound effects artist who's built nearly his entire career off of lying and taking the credit for other people's work.

@@lpk675 thanks, I've actually heard a bit of Tommy myself, like how he did the music for an Arthur GBC game. What does Tommy have to do with Wonka?

I was also a financial flop

Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is the better version

Yeah I read that it became a hit thru being shown on TV, not as big as Wizard of Oz but similar

I noticed it’s becoming the same thing with Charlie and the chocolate factory. A lot of people hated it but now It’s been gaining a more cult following.

It’s the opposite. Critics love the film and audiences have had a hard time coming to love it

So true.

And the original movie was so unfaithful to the book

The original version of the movie was only made that way due to a corporate sponsorship of a real candy bar. The actual one the original writer wanted was the adaptation of it in 2005 which people hated for somehow being a “remake”, when that was not its intention.

The original is completely inferior to the 2005 remake tbh

But that would require people to ... actually... ... read!!! You MONSTER! How dare you expect anyone to ... read ... *vomits*. We live in times where "sources" don't matter, and even if they ARE pulled up, they are disregarded, retro-fitted and revisioned to match modern politics and sensibilities, rather than facts and faithful or even creative retelling. So hence people don't "read" (supresses the urge to barf)... How dare you call for that! [/SARCASM OFF] So, yeah. Welcome to the future. Interesting that they tried making a prequel to the story, but the setup "Hero good, Companies bad" is such a layz take. Similar to what they did in "Curela" - a hugely missed opporunity for a real conflict rooted in the character and chance for growth and change... They could have gone for Wonka's upbringing and maybe trials and fails to get into the business driving him "crazy" - like I envisioned Cruela to go too, but instead they went into some stupid backstory to include Dalmatians somehow. Predictable and so not fitting the character. They are just geniuses to begin with and have some "tragic" (not really) backstory.

Seriously, how was he even considered a legit creator by so many people... over a million for freaking sake...

its ironic to call out movies to be more creative whilst he did not check his own content...

Bait Content quality is falling

@@Guitarist500 It is fantastically good. What do you mean Not better as a critique point of view in terms of story telling. But as a family friendly movie, it was good.

The last good movies i saw was Barbie and Everything, Everywhere, At all Once, one this year and one last year :/ from the overflow of movies they keep pumping only 2 were wacthable, Hollywood deserves to go broke.

Modern movies all have the same artificial look and pacing, soppy acting, full of awful w0ke and silly or loud music, its enough to make you glaze over with complete boredom. The Wilder version is unbeatable.

I actually liked ridley Scott's take on Napoleon.

You are definitely exaggerating. We have had good movies this year. Barbie, Oppenheimer, Gran Turismo, the new Godzilla movie just to name a few.

@@ajr_7828don’t forget across the spiderverse, the Mario movie, and the fnaf movie 🔥🔥🔥🔥

Because *everything* these days has to be an origin story, or have a multiverse. It's played itself out.

@@Shah-of-the-ShineboxThat’s the problem.

Having a prequel isn't a bad thing

@@THADDAUS-vm5qp It doesn't progress the story though as the events already happened

because it is the origin of gene wilder's wonka and not depp's wonka

I think this will sadly be brushed under the rug since it hasn’t caught much attention yet

*illuminati

@@moonchild1772 Illuminaughtii the KZfaqr, not the organization. Yes, with 2 I s.

What do you mean?

@@redbulbuniverse This video heavily plagiarized another video by a KZfaqr named Jack Saint.

@@lpk675 LMAAOOOO

This is like a doomer pilled “the world sucks” type KZfaq channel, it sucks.

@@AselectirYT nah fr it really does

A lot of it is due to nepotism as well - many of the writers, storyboarders and producers these days are talentless hacks who are just 3rd generation hollywood given a job because of who their uncle or aunt is/was. They've never been a normal person in their life so they think the narratives pushed by media and stories are what people actually think/believe and it becomes a self feeding cycle.

That's a really good point

Fire

Shoot even when they seem to be able to create their own stories with the material it sucks...Witcher...Later seasons of Game of Thrones. Rings of Power ..

@bryan81584 - Well, every franchise you mentioned was adapted from someone else's original work. So while the writers might have been given a bit more freedom on some of those projects, they were still boxed in creatively; having to use a pre-existing world, pre-existing characters, etc. I think these writers would probably be much passionate if they were creating something all their own - rather than having to re-tell the stories of others.

subtlety is not a strong suit of a lot of Hollywood "creative" types

I couldn't agree with you more! It's crazy how true this is

I robot was something out of the ordinary

wouldn't you have to see the movie to say this incel?

Are you talking about movie remakes in general or about Willy Wonka remakes? Because in case you don't know, Charly and the chocolate factory wasn't a remake of Willy Wonka and the chocolate factory.

With shit politics

​@@Cheyne_TetraMFG Whats his politics? (I don't want to look at the rest of his channel cause he sounds like a chud)

Bro thinks he’s SunnyV2

@@Holyduck777Alt right, sigma male, anti-woke, anti-corporations, anti-progressives, anti-china, and incel ideas

@@eko9554Why would bro want to be SunnyV2

it was overly quirky cringe inducing garbage, I can't fathom why people like this trite.

@@AbrasiousProductions That's fine, you don't have to like it. But it could be a personal issue with you - maybe some reason why you look upon things with a miserable lens. And that is totally fine. Personally, I loved the film and found it to be wholesome and genuinely fun.

@@AbrasiousProductions YEEES

💀💀💀

@@notwwwansik thank you :)

I grew up on the Depp one saw it when I was 9, but the Wilder one better, I saw that when I was like 15 I was like wow this so much better. I think it was the practical effects, which I prefer anyways, it was so seemless and Charlie’s grandpa was wildin. So I was more immersed in the world with practical effects it felt real like it could really happen. Also Tim Burton Wonka felt kinda socially awkward and anxious idk while Wilder was a lot more charismatic and captivating, but still had that lil crazy factor like you didn’t know what to expect. I think Wilder one is more enjoyable overall

I grew up on Wilder's version, but i preferred Tim Burtons version. Different strokes, different folks. Not watching the new one.

Bro honestly the world looks cool but the cgi takes me out of it. Like wow so fake might as well be a cartoon. @@Jayde0007

This movie is going to be up there next to Greatest Showman!

@@madrabiddog 100% agree with you!

I feel the same way! It was so much better than I thought, and although some lines were a bit corny I thought it was a wonderful and lighthearted movie.

Thats great!

Same!

Couldn't agree more. While it's not a "cinematic masterpiece" it is a really fun movie. I loved the songs in it. I don't know how some people didn't enjoy it.

It’s because they still are mad over the Johnny depp version and haven’t grown up from it yet

pure delusion and bitterness. if its not your deep and thought provoking masterpiece, it gets judged for being bad on all fronts. one loses every crediblity if one dislikes everything about this movie

Definitely

The singing and songs ruined it for me. I get the original has singing but not every 2 freaking mins. Cut out thing singing and it would have been fine. There is also a certain darkness missing from it i feel.

LMAOOOOOOOO

haha@@The-Busy-Beeeee

Is this moon youtuber an alt account for sunnV2?

@@fondue542 I wouldn’t be surprised if they were brothers or something

that guy he "copied" from is a creep anyway

If Warner Bros decided to make a Ken movie, I'm sure a lot of men would like that, and they would support it.

@@jesustovar2549it wouldn’t do as well though because it’d be a dragged out sequel.

They didn't circle... they simply made a good movie and exposed the gO wOkE gO bRoKe grift for what it is (along with Mario, D&D, etc.)

@@jesustovar2549why, wouldn’t they support barbie?

@@commandershepard9920my guy, Barbie was literally *the* “woke” movie of the year, where were you?

Same

Oof 😂

LMAO

irony XD

Hollywood has been doing this for a century. Especially after the Soviet Union started paying them, and later China. Where do you think the vernacular, "It's just business," came from?

We are witnessing the rise of corporate greed.

Ehem ehem the lorax

it's a hilarious hypocrisy

Nah, you’re simply not over critical

I actually like this version (2023) for it's writting . everything is subtile and well written I think, They don't spat fact on your face. And maybe this version isn't faithfull to the original but i loved how lovely and kind this wonka was.

@@arodrev5987 Nah, you're simply a cuck

If you like this version I can only really say: good for you. If it works for you it works for you, no need to stress about not being critical enough.

This is one of those films where I actually walked out of the cinema. Brilliant acting? Anything, but that.

Incredible comment, really shows how any movie can make an impact

Hope you doing better honestly

Those lyrics resonated with me so much. Thank you for sharing. I went with my daughters, and after years of feeling numb, for a moment, I genuinely enjoyed myself, as well. All the best to everyone. 🌷

No….This film trash😐

​@@notwwwansik It's your opinion. Doesn't mean anyone must see it that way! I think it's a good movie and no one can make me believe otherwise!

well the argument there is that those movies have been in production for a while. it's like turning around a tanker. things will be bad for a while until maybe they start getting better

Agreed, but this particular Wonka movie was _not_ made by Disney, it was made by Warner Brothers. As for Disney, they are woke as hell and the only thing I even like from them are the live action _Alice in Wonderland_ movies, but I find ways to watch those without Disney earning any $$$ from me watching those.

Just like Communism lol

And what will you do about it? Protest? You suck at life brah. You are a moron

Isn't that just Einstein's definition of insanity

Roald Dahl actually wrote that book too. I think it's Charlie and the Glass Elevator.

It would’ve been cool if they did that at the end of the dark reimagining of the film which was almost entirely faithful to the book, and then they made a sequel for it

@@lainiwakura1776thank you.... Remember 3rd grade teacher read us both books over the course of the school year Whenever I mention Charlie and the great glass elevator people act like I’m in a Mandela effect...

@@lainiwakura1776 he also started writing a third book to that which he ended up scraping (i dont remember the name tho) it would've been cool to see both the second book be adapted and maybe even a third sequel using the general idea of the draft version of the third book or smthn

​@@paintingdreams290Was there any information on it of what's going to be like for the third one?

Hun this whole video was stolen lmao he has no idea what he is talking about whatsoever

I think the biggest critique is how unoriginal and uncreative Hollywood has become, which isn't anything new, but it's extremely valid. The only thing I care about is a good story with lovable, fun and relatable characters if that can be delivered with a preexisting franchise go for it. But I think a lot of people would prefer original concepts, new stories, original characters and preferably a strong emotional weight to the story. Instead of milking old franchises to death, try to make new ones. It’s never guaranteed, but all amazing franchises start with one great movie and a new, interesting or creative concept.

@@Anonymous-qh9gq because things sell and i dont know dude a thing not being original doesn mean its bad we had oppenheimer, barbie, across the spider verse and being original doesnt mean is going to be good like wish or elemental

- a video essay plagiarized from Jack Saint

i'm 15 and my mum's 55 and we couldnt stop singing and grinning when we saw the movie

I want the Great Elevator.

Of course it's a fun movie, it's for kids. Tired of these fucking bot channels trying to paint it as some sort of failed masterpiece. Delusional.

I loved the film , the race swapping of characters pissed me off but the music and song is amazing, the characters are interesting, it’s just fun

@@dizzypukas8410 was there race-swapping? (this is a genuine question btw, i'm not trying to be mean -v-")

He has a punchable face too. He looks so smug and bitter.

Totally agree, it's sad that he's the best our generation can come up with. This generation has zero charismatic character actors

I would think if was Johnny Depp 😂

None of those kids and parents would be able to leave.

🤣

Reminds me of Frankie Boyle's joke "Michael Jackson's Childrens Hospital" 😂

LMFAOOO

That's fine, I consider the book and the original movie two separate things that each have their own identity and are good in their own ways. They are definitely different, but each is great. The music from the film is impeccable and memorable, the 2005 film music sucked

Dahl helped adapt Chitty Chitty Bang Bang (story by Ian Fleming, you know the James Bond guy) for film and then disowned it too. I've read the book and seen the 1971 film. The 1971 film is better than the book. IMO anyway.

@@BigSplenda1885 the 2005 film music is good

That’s too bad

Dahl was also antisemetic, so to be blunt, I do not give a damn about his opinion, not even on his own stories and hiw they are told

Roald Dahl was a racist Jew hater, who cares? And Dahl died in 1990 so I'm sure if he was alive in 2005 he would've hated Burton's remake way more

@@BigSplenda1885 Dahl actually would have liked the 2005 version more, it was more in line with the book

@@NoNameTaken117he wasn’t even alive when it came out

@@LordHADESKS True however his wife was, she was the main reason why she greenlit the 2005 movie

@@BigSplenda1885 the family gave the 2005 film their endorsement 👍

its a prequel to the original read up on it

@@blueangelto-rr6vx Ah. I thought I had read it was a prequel to the Depp movie, not the Wilder one. That makes more sense now. Still an unnecessary prequel though. =/

@@shinythings1It was good though.

​@@shinythings1It's not unnecessary.

Snorts! Thanks for that I needed a giggle!😂

There's an animated short from the 90s about gold wrapping paper and the cycle it goes through. From a rich kid with an expensive present down to a poor kid that actually values the best up last piece of gold paper.

@@mannyparranda8891 there is precedence! Instant classic!

This

right?! it's so fucking stupid

Finnally. FACTS

True

Well done or not you're ignoring the points made in the video. The Wonka movie completely ruined the lore and dynamics of the Willy Wonka universe. What's worse is that it's not simply another retelling but a prequel, so it's really twisting the knife after stabbing the franchise.

He just generates these videos with AI for ad revenue💰

Yep

This isn't a remake tho. It's a prequel.

what type of question is this. If something is successful people want more of the character. That's why they keep making remakes. Just like how we have almost 12 FNF movies. People like it so they keep making.

@@ajr_7828 we dont have 12 FNF movies i think u mean video games

@@ajr_7828those are not movies lol

@@ajr_7828 do you know what a movie is? go check your brain or smth a video game is not a movie

Maybe its because this movie is not meant to copy the old movie. This is a completely different take on the movie. Your mom just wants the the new movie to be like the old which makes no sense. Why watch a new movie with the expectation for it to be like the old one lol.

Hate to say, but your mom’s standard is her own. Why be confined within people’s opinions when you can see it and judge it for yourself?

So extremely true 🎉 I think this all the time as I type "video game full story" into my search bar ,when using audible or just reading . I'm like any of these stories would make for a great movie or series!

Sadly people don't go out of their way to support things that are not familiar. This is why we rarely see something original pop off.

I was going to say it’s not a remake, but in a way it is. It’s a prequel to Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, but it is also kind of its own thing in a way. It’s an amazing movie and I wish you would at least watch it before hating on it. Even if it isn’t a perfect adaptation it’s still an amazing movie made with love and care. It is also NOT a cash grab.

and what about the new Wonka film?

That's what Moon said.

​@@ryanmatthews3609honestly, the trailers havent interested me whatsoever. The one thing that it has going for it is the animation, and frankly, that isnt enough. It's just, an unnecessary origin. The reason that the tim burton version worked so well, was the respect it paid to the source material, and the level of work, careful casting, art direction, and set design that went into it. This just feels...forced. like it's made solely to try and prop up someone that, really isn't working.

@@ZynetESLDthat’s how it always goes

Good to know that you have good taste

Exactly. It's a cozy whimsical holiday movie that at no point feels insincere. And in current environment I feel this simplicity works in the movie's favor.

completely agree 😊

Totally, just came from the theatre and loved it, in the cinema you could hear everybody laughing and having fun.

Totally agree. As an avid viewer of these reviews, mostly obviously negative for some reason, you go in cringing and expecting the worst when you go out there to watch it, feeling as though you're risking everything. This is an effect we have grown to assume in movies, btw, making good once enjoyable movies bad or scrutinized by amateur critics looking at Tiktok as they watch the film and keyboard warriors living in moms basements. I feel nobody doesn't want to just simply have fun anymore, even when the film is exactly that. I'm betting if Gene Wilders beloved version of Wonka came out today, it wouldnt even break even.

Thank you for this comment. I loved this Wonka more than the other Wonka's. The other ones gave me nightmares as a kid.

The Joker is pretty much a prime example of "blank page" villain, ideal for *comics* whose readers will swallow anything hook, line and sinker if it "sounds good". Over the history of the character he has had at least a dozen different iterations and even the writers of the comics can't decide what they want him to be so in some back stories they even have the character tell the previous background stories to him. In essence he is whatever the reader of the comics want him to be. Any well-written villain needs to have these three characteristics. 1. A clear motive, preferably an underlying obsession which sets them out from any two-bit thug. 2. Traits which make them somewhat "sympathetic" to the audience or displaying characteristics which reflect some our own worst sides. 3. Consistency, which makes them human at core and is the most important factor. Now the Joker has never had a clear motive and in some iterations just makes up as he goes along. In fact he comes across as an aimless wanderer who can't even make sense of his own actions since he doesn't stick to them. The *only* clear motive he has had is to treat the world like one big joke nobody gets and therefore has the "smilex gas/joker venom" which makes everybody die smiling. Had they stuck with that every single time they'd have a character with a bizarre but clear motive. Make the entire world laugh to death. Well, he's called Joker isn't he? Not Lord Chaos or Captain Evil or Bizarro Man. As for traits. Well, the lastest iterations of the Joker portrays him as an angry teen. Teens don't get the world and can't make sense of it. Since they're driven by feelings and lack both knowledge and experience (with few exceptions) what actually is eerily predictable historical patterns instead becomes "random chaos" to them. Even the most horrible dictator like Hitler has a logical explanation given the realities of history. How many today realize that the very same social darwinism they propagate on the net was one of the core beliefs of the nazis and that this very belief actually largely paved the way for them? To ignorant people Hitler was just some crazy guy who popped up out of the blue and conned his way into power. The Holocaust becomes a wholly bizarre event too when it should be seen as the logical final goal of rabid nationalism mated with social darwinism. The Joker makes sense to these teens (and those who never developed beyond this level) because to them everything in the world is some sort of unpredictable chaos. They lack scope and can't perceive of anything else but their immediate present. They define their myopic reality from their own needs not those of those in power. All great villains are *Machiavellian* . That is why others follow them and what makes them dangerous. The Joker however is a bizarre amalgam of characteristics nobody would follow or look up to. A real-life Joker wouldn't last a day in the real criminal underworld. As for consistency. The Joker has none. He's a blank slate of random madness. Fact is that the only thing that is missing from him being a rambling madman is hallucinations. Everything else is just a chaotic mess. You see that in mentally ill people suffering from psychosis. The emperor has no clothes because the emperor is *naked* . There is nothing to explain because there is nothing to get. "I’d rather speculate." Thanks for being honest and upfront about that. Speculation is the hallmark of ignorant people who follow no paradigm and like to fit anything into their own highly subjective narrative, i.e. the same kind of people who are ignorant about oceanography and marine biology and who like to imagine that "we" (who are "we" again??) know less about the depth of the seas than we know about interstellar space (which is utter nonsense) and therefore speculate wildly about what kind of "amazing monsters" lurk there. Their *imagination* is the driving force behind this speculation, certainly not reason, observerable facts and reasonable deduction. Again since they know absolutely nothing about this matter (which is called *ignorance* ) they imagine pretty much anything. And they repeatedly are masters of a fallacy called "Argument from Ignorance" and shifting the burden of proof. Speculation holds *negative* connotations when it comes to the ignorant. "and that’s why he was such a terrifying villain" To ignorant people definitely. The fear of the unknown is largely based on *ignorance* which is why people in the past didn't dare sailing out too far because they feared they would come "to the end of the world" and just sail "over the edge". No, the sad part of the story is that the Joker is a perfect reflection of the aimless and ignorant youth of today. Educated, open-minded and knowledgeable people see the structures. The ignorant can only see the surface so the very notion that the world is random place of arbitrary events they themselves can't make sense of is why the Joker is popular with them. They don't understand the world and therefore fear it. They're as lost as the Joker. And ignorance is the real horror of our world. For it's how people are exploited. Over and out.

​@@McLarenMercedesmajor respect for writing a whole essay

Finally an intelligent person.

The movie’s good and even solid but not like the best movie ever I think the number one complaint people will have with the film is wonka’s character he seems to be over the top and charming but they remove a lot of his darker characters such as how the prequel looks like wonka met the Oompa Loompas before he built the factory when Dahl implied that wonka met the Oompa Loompas when the factory was built since we wouldn’t have the whole “Grandpa Joe used to be a factory worker then got fired, for all these Oompa Loompas”

Yeah it seems like people just want the same content, not a new take on a character. Which goes against what people are currently fighting for "new adaptations and not recycled content." But when we take an old character and change it people get mad that its different and praise the old version. @@sophiagonzales8974

I don’t think it’s bad. Most people takes movie way too seriously nowadays

@@usercs_2682 Yeah I honestly just saw this as an alternative prequel /fanfic story to wonka instead of the "wonka" in Charlie and the chocolate factory

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

This is not a reboot for crying out loud,you people will just judge something without knowing nothing on it

@@jeffersonhassan4558 what do you mean "you people"?

​@@jeffersonhassan4558 it's not exempt from criticism or hate. Especially if it might be the worse iteration of the character.

⁠@@Kinglizard220he never said it was exempt from anything. He just stated a fact that it is not a reboot. Plus the movies actually good

@@oXRaptorzXo yee

you failed to mention DEI

Exactly

Yeah no s### I wonder why oh it's because it's another f##### remake that nobody ask for next to Dolittle

And then they hire someone who actually is creative, only to limit they creativeness. Sabotaging they very film/animation/show/series.

That’s the definition of Blumhouse’s career

because he actually plagiarized this video

agreed!

I think Timothee is much better than Brad. The latter seems only one- or two-dimensional to me, while the first is multi-dimensional IMHO. Also, one need to realize that Pitt has got better as an actor with age. Timothee shined at his 20 and continues to grow.

@@LAZISH don't embarrass yourself like that. Look at Brad's filmography, he either 'makes' the movie or is perfect for the role. Whereas Timothy almost always takes me out of the movie, cause he goes for roles that don't suit him at all. I really liked 'Bones and All', but he ruined the experience and his acting wasn't convincing. Unless he learns how to completely transform like Christian Bale, I won't change my opinion

ღღღ ხარ თუ ვინცხა:))))@@xXx___xXx Go google:)))) Wikipedia: " His acting career began at age 23 in 1987 with roles in the hit Fox television series 21 Jump Street. He subsequently appeared in episodes for television shows during the late 1980s and played his first major role in the slasher film Cutting Class (1989)". Pitt's early roles even some of the later roles were tots unremarkables, e.g. his part in Legends of Fall:))))))

Trust me it’s a good film it pleasantly surprised me, if u don’t like it after watching it then I understand but please watch the film before u cast judgment

Me, I did.

Literally who cares?

@@bulb9970 A lot of people, actually.

@@bulb9970a lot of people… isn’t that why he’s deleting comments?

@@bulb9970clearly allot of people, don’t you have a brain?

@@MB-eh2kp If he’s deleting then why is this one still up?

I loved this new new Wonka :) I think you should give it a try, form your own opinion, instead of just listening what people online say. I grew up with the original and Depp version and enjoyed both. This is different, but this one stands on its own as a story for a younger, optimistic Wonka. This film is directed by Paul King, who has proven himself with Paddington and Paddington 2 already. If you go in with an open mind, you'll find a genuinely fun and wholesome film. I think it's funny that Moon talks in his video as if he's an authority on the film, marking his opinions as fact.

@@thewrongvine You're absolutely right.I was too quick to judge it based on reviews made before or was released. I have actually heard some good things about it and look forward to watching it now.

I grew up with the Gene Wilder version. And I love original films. But Charlie and the Chocolate Factory was so good… I loved it as much as the original! Depp and Wilder equally great as Wonka

I think the reasons people like the johnny depp version so much is because Willy Wonka is much more relatable

💀💀💀💀💀

@@kimi9572 just saw wonka, and i disagree about everything except the soundtrack and CGI giraffe. also, how are the themes unclear?? they practically spell it out for you at the end lol

@@kimi9572 Story's bad (I guess because you say so...) Themes are unclear (Following your dreams and taking risks in unclear to you?) Villains are not intimidating at all (They're a fucking chocolate mafia... With a chocolate vault under a church... in a Ronald Dhal based story. What Wattpad writing guide told you Villains NEED to be intimidating? That's clearly not what they're going for, You're complaining that God of War isn't a good platformer...) Soundtrack's mediocre (I liked it so... I guess the problem is with your taste? It's nothing big but I liked a few songs and they get the story across) Directing is inefficient (Were you at the shooting? Did you see the director in person? No? I thought so.) The only consolation is that it's entertaining from start to finish. (You sir, embody everything I hate about movie critics. Being entertaining and having fun to watch is not enough for you? Then what do you EXPECT from a movie) Also you complain about the directing, and as an example you bring out the poster.... My brother in Christ, the poster is from the marketing departament, the director has nothing to do with it XD

@@d4n737 That person was clearly a troll, but did the right thing in deleting that post now. I agree with everything you said and especially the last part: the marketing department really let this film down. The poster and trailer were so bad. The film deserved much better. I've seen it now, and it could be a future classic.

@@AbcDef-ww2gy Thanks... It's uhh... Kinda personal, but a close family member died just before the movie came out. I cannot grieve like other people do. Often times, I just don't know what to do with myself... So I went to the cinema, just to do SOMETHING. It helped. I felt better I will defend this movie with my fucking life.

@@d4n737 Wow. That's an incredible story, and I understand your passion in dealing with the troll now. Yes, the best way to deal with a sudden bereavement is to throw yourself into something that will occupy your mind (until a time when your mind is calmer). Usually, people throw themselves aggressively into some form of work. Going to the cinema was your alternative, but unfortunately a movie only lasts two hours, and then you're back in the same situation. I suppose talking about the movie and defending it from trolls is also a form of work, especially now when it has just opened, so keep going and good luck with that! I hope you'll find peace eventually, with the passage of time.

It's a prequel not a remake!!!

some may say they need a great reset and then build back better.

​@user-vi9zm5ss4f I saw the movie, and it was definitely not a remake. Yeah there was some homages to the original but it's barely a remake 🤷

@user-vi9zm5ss4fbro it’s a prequel they said in the trailer how Willy became wonka lol watch the movie lol

@user-vi9zm5ss4falso it shows nothing like the remake lol I don’t know what you’re thinking

I don't think the Wonka movie in particular lectured that much. In fact I think it just popped us into magical land with no explanation, like anime plots

nostalgia probably

It's nostalgia. People who were adults in 2005 hated it and rightfully so. Depp played Wonka like a creepy Michael Jackson facsimile, it was awful.

I liked it cause it was wierd. If u never seen the original, the Tim Burton was fun🤷🏻‍♀️

@@BigSplenda1885 Wilder just playing as himself, not Wanka! (If you'd seen his other works)

Older generation are ones who are being nostalgic, if depp movie came out during their time and wilder one second time they would Hate wilder movie. But both movies have their own beauty i think, first one is more of what you would watch as kid when you woke up in morning But depp wonka was cooler

He should change his name to Moan.

It is becoming ironic really. Like, he recycle his content the same way these studios recycles their IPs while adding nothing to it. 😂

he's commonplace these days...can't be happy unless he's miserable.

Everybody loves a critic. There is a reason for that euphemism.

That’s what I’m saying

I saw it last night with my friend and LOVED it.

He's so cynical to the point of stealing a lot of this video from a Jack Saint video that's months old, about the concerns of this movie potentially being bad. Moon most likely didn't even watch the movie and is just hating on it for clicks.

Nah it was still a Burton film and even the "bleak" scenes were still filled with his signature flair

@@BigSplenda1885 what are you trying to argue here? I’m not saying they were uninteresting or lacking detail, I’m saying the colouring was bleak for the sheer point of there being a contrast. All the scenes have the burton signature look, but they 100% did use the contrasting colour palette and they did it on purpose

@@BigSplenda1885 Obviously the movie's going to have a style, but that is completely separated from the actual atmosphere and visual identity of the scenes

Classic Rage Bait crap

Closer to the book doesn't always mean better in terms of FILM. Like when they inevitably remake the Wizard of Oz closer to the book... I don't care how dark and scary they make Oz or how much CGI they put in it to where you can count the hairs in Scarecrow's nose, the MGM 1939 version will always be superior, end of story