Yep

Fr

Nutshell in nutshell 🤣👍

A new fighter appears… Intel!

Seeing my 4090 burns up, it’s not even about wallet anymore. It’s about do you value your time.

The wallet has been defeated in many battles

Thy purse hath been vanquished in many a skirmish!

It's madness!

So I just bought a alien ware pc but when ever I plug it in to outlet power leaves

@@DavidPerez-jb2bfi think i know the problem it's an alienware

@@DavidPerez-jb2bffirst mistake was buying an alienware pc my boy😢

​@DavidPerez-jb2bf Alienware is a really bad company I wouldn't even spend 100 dollars on it

Same

“B-but muh fortnite can’t run on amd!”

​@@flamee23312 who cares about fortnite, "Linux can't run on Nvidia GPUs"

​@@bonkatomicpunchenjoyer3% market share in desktop computers

I agree. Though Intel’s battlemage may honestly win me over if they have really good performance like the leaks

yo im on titan you got any ubers to earth

I heard the government raised the methane tax for lot of the Moons. You can't have a stable government in any dimension of the universe.

Rea

​@@Shadow_YT267rough, I'm on the moon so I can take a short trip if I want to get one of them. You can ship to me and I'll send it to you if you want?

I’m on io

I read this a lot, but in practice I've personally never upgraded within the lifespan of a single socket. And that's also what I see in my social circle, by the time people want to upgrade a CPU, the platform they currently own is dead anyway as it's generally once every 5 or 6 generations. For instance my friend upgraded from Ryzen 1700X on B350, which is technically AM4. But their motherboard never got the BIOS update needed to run a 5800X3D. So they upgraded to AM5 with a 7800X3D instead. Same for me, I went from Q6600 G0, to i5-3570K, to i5-11400. Regardless of whether I had gone with Intel or AMD at the time I would have had to upgrade the entire platform 3 times anyway.

​@@fermitupoupon1754 Well one of my friends used a b350 he was on Ryzen 1600x then went to 2600x and finally a 3600x so it's just for people who upgrade on 1-2 years timeframe.

​@@fermitupoupon1754sorry to hear that bro you just had bad luck.

@@Mashiyat meh, it's not really about luck. I just buy whatever meets my requirements at the time and offers the best bang for the buck. And then I use it until it becomes frustrating, and then I upgrade. So I pay no attention to an upgrade path within the platform because I know I'm not going to use it regardless. And even now if I wanted an 'upgrade' I can buy an i9-11900K for barely 200 euro.

​@@fermitupoupon1754 If things had kept up with the pace of the 80s through to the first half of the 2000s in (consumer) CPU processing power, there may be more incentive to upgrade. It would be a chore to use, but you could still use a Core 2 PC from 2006 on the internet today. In 2006, a computer from 1988 would have been almost entirely useless for anything but its original purposes.

I heard someone said they ordered from proxima centauri and still got same day shipping so you are probably ok

@@Riyozsu what about shipping to 12 Dimensional Universe? Does Zach have the power?

@@Riyozsu thanks mate here in pluto we don't have good pc builders

Oui 😊

​@@RiyozsuSame day delivery guaranteed across the galaxy😊 (for those ordering from Andromeda it can take up to 1 week)

Yea, its definitely not because AMD GPUs offer much better raster price-to-performance than NVIDIA, yet people still buy NVIDIA for that reason...

legit me too except i was building with 7th gen. now im building a pc and everything is different.

Built my first ever PC 1797 days ago. AMD was a no brainer for me, across the board their CPU & GPU performance was rock solid also something that is not talked about enough is how much less power they use. I put my light bill into consideration when building my PC which does stack up at the end of the year now i don't have to worry as much about that while being able to run anything on the market at 1080p without issue.

It's kind of strange how AMDs cpus are so power efficient and the gpus have had some issued like multi monitor and idle power issues. Might be that Nvidia is really pushing since they own the market on the gpu side and Intel's cpu arent as refined.

@@ImDembe I think amd gpu only have a problem with overheating I had to switch to nvidia gpu because my rx 580 would always overheat, even with 60 fps lowest graphics My hd 8570 is even worse, and I plan on swapping it out for the gt 1030

@@aksGJOANUIFIFJiufjJU21 Well that was the case before, i know the R9 cards ran really hot, today you can underclock. I run my card undervolted, get 90% of the preformance but i dropped my temps with 15c on both gpu and cpu, 600rpm fan speed. Your case it might be a design flaw or it's just a bad cooling solution from the partner that make the card.

@@ImDembe RX 580 Asus rog strix oc

Yeah no one is paying for dollars with fps😂

Ok I will start😊

@@Zach_Tech_Tips u had me believing it was the real him for a second there, got my hopes up :(

@@poggiespogpogpogpogpoggies7278 I am the real him😡

There is no good ones😐

@@Phantom_7003 yeah but wb the "best" one, doesnt have to mean its good

But why do you want it then ​@@thegodlybannana5583

and now your gpu is the bottle neck

no.

FX was right after the Phenom too

Rtx 4070: 😐

Highly unlikely, they have their hands full with just regular flat gaming problems still, and will continue to for the foreseeable future. Also that's hardly the whole picture, just look at the AMD 7000-series... AMD finally stepped up and did their part in updating their drivers for VR support on the 7000s, but in some form the problem still remains. At this point it's Meta that's the issue, they still show 7000 series as unsupported, and are completely neglecting PCVR as a whole since they make far more money from standalone. So yeah, even if Intel was to take the time to work on vr support, it would be all for naught until Meta stops ignoring PCVR as a whole.

also intrel and nvidia there both plug and play

No one cares

@@manzencow9582 ok thank you

Depends what they oc to and what your system usage is

7800x3d is overkill for 4070

It doesn't matter, just get the best gpu that u can. 7800x3d can handle any gpu

There will always be a bottleneck. A GPU bottleneck means you're using the full potential of that 4070 and it's not held back by a slow CPU, memory, lower resolution, or something like V-Sync or an FPS limiter in-game. You could save some money and get a Ryzen 7600 (or 7700 if you want better multicore performance) and still get similar gaming performance because that 4070 will be the bottleneck anyways. A GPU bottleneck is ideal as long as it's not something ridiculous like a RTX 3050 and i9-14900K. That 7800X3D + 4070 combo is pretty good, however.

@@vekazu_is_great_guy I like the effects of N Videa because I play Fortnite and other games

@@vekazu_is_great_guy would a 4070 super be good?

The 3600 will hold it back a bit.

3600 will hold it back BUT you could always upgrade it to a 5800x/5800x3d Maybe even a 5600x if you wanna be cheaper

Of course not... If the tv/monitor can't display above 60hz, then it doesn't matter what your GPU is capable of.

Yes

Vram

Nvidia GPU. Which CPU you need depends on which video editing programs you use.

4060Ti not the best price to performance card, also are you doing productivity work as 5800x is overkill for just gaming, however if you need 8 cores go for 5700x, or pure gaming, 5600 is enough.

@@AlexHusTech oké thanks what graphics card do you recomand because I dont have Many expiriens

@@carspotterbreda2992 First need to know 1080p or 1440p gaming?

@@AlexHusTech preferably at 1440p, but there are major cost differences in 1440p graphics cards and 1080 graphics cards

@@carspotterbreda2992 Yh big difference, for Nvidia 4070 would be min for 1440p and 7700XT for AMD in my opinion.