Ursula you lied to me,their shovels can fly 😂

The picture of the Leopard is from a training in Poland where one Leopard ran into the other knocking the turret of.

The costs of each armament: Bradley: 4.35 million dollars Leopard 2A6: 8.42 million dollars Lancet: 0.02 - 0.04 million dollars

Orlan-10 is a true recon drone. It flies very high, has long duration and better sensors.

The Orlan-10 has not failed - it's purely a reconnaissance drone. It's purpose is to gather information. It's not an armed drone.

Here's the thing....tanks (Leopard2s/T-90s etc.) are not obsolete in any way. However, tanks---no matter how modern---can only succeed if they are a component of a properly balanced combined arms team which is intelligently employed against realistically achievable tactical and strategic objectives. There is no high-tech "wunderwaffe" that can win by itself when employed incorrectly. Even if a technology has a decisive edge, history shows us that such an advantage is only short-term as counter-technologies and/or techniques are soon developed.

What helps Lancet-3 defeat Leo-2A6 is the fact that Lancet-3 DIVES onto the ROOF of the tank. Shaped charge into the roof will penetrate any tank that exists in the world currently. Both sides also use typical quadcopters for tank hunting: they strap an RPG grenade to them, look for a tank and dive onto its roof or motor-transmission cover, where penetration is more likely. It's all about targeting the weak spots.

Another outstanding piece made by reading the lancet 3 sales brochure interspersed with some borrowed lancet 3 manufacturer video. The lancet 3 is effective against the leopard 2A6 for exactly the same reason it is effective against any other armored vehicle: because it's a well designed modern anti-armor munition.

Ah, the famous X-Wing Shovel.

Did anyone ever get the message from the German Army from WW2 that said without air cover tanks are a sitting target.

Actually the CEO and creator of the Lancet drones recently said in a video that at closer range, they prefer to use the Lancet-1's. The Lancet-3 actually looks different from when it was debuted which the front wings are longer than the X shape. There is also a new, and third Lancet variant that has a increased range (200km), and a new launch system, and other features.

Great sales pitch for the Lancet 3 by Russia. Counter-measures against drones should be a top priority for everyone. The way of war has changed drastically overnight since the first Azerbaijan-Armenia conflict in which drone were wildly successful by Azerbaijan, that should have been a huge wake up call for the entire Military/Defense complex across the World. Methods of operation are changing daily with the war in Ukraine on every aspect of warfare.

Нужно собрать танковый кулак из 200-250 Леопардов и Абрамсов для прорыва , а за ними Бредли и БМП 300-350 машин с пехотой 5-6 тысяч человек . И к ипеням погибнуть через полчаса .

Those Bradleys and leopards that you showed a video clip of were victims of a minefield, not a drone attack

отличное соотношение цены Ланцета и Леопарда

it will do the same against Challengers , Abrams or Merkava. The tank in the open is an inviting and rather easy target, If the mines, AT infantry Kornets, KA-52 Ataka AT missiles, laser guided arty shells don't get you, there's the Lancet.

All tanks are vulnerable to top down missiles. Hard kill counter measures could help, but if it can get near the hull from the top it can destroy it.

Countermeasures against drones would be an interesting topic. High-value decoy targets that are deployed with active units, more sophisticated radar to detect along with aircraft to intercept, use of warning system based on audio detection of drone engine/propeller characteristics, and defensive anti-drones constantly in the air over the battlefield, etc.

The Orlan 10 is literally taking a lot of the videos we see of the lancet strikes

Just like AK-47 this is another masterpiece from Kalashnikov. A legend already.

Да ... Забыл сказать : присылайте еще , Леопардов , Абрамсов и даже Меркаву ! Мы - всеядные !

If you look at the body, motor, prop it looks like something your average R.C. hobbyist could put together, which is what makes it cheap and quick to assemble. All the clever stuff is in the head. And how such a tiny explosive warhead causes so much damage is quite remarkable (to me at least).

The Leopard2A6, T90, Abrams or whatever tank needs something like a Gepard + air-support to operate the way they should... I wouldn't go out in ANY tank without decent AA or air-support... It's suicide.

It is basically a mini missile that can be launched by a soldier.

Seen a short of a T90m hitting a land mine then be hit with RPGs and anti tank missles and was still able to take the damage and retreat from the battlefield was very impressive!

There's footage of it hitting a disabled leo2 A6 to prevent it being recovered, not seen a single Leo2 taken out directly by a Lancet (not that it isn't possible). A lot of the clips in this video are pretty misleading as they are from AT-mine damaged/destroyed vehicles, KA52 strikes etc., not Lancet strikes.

It is a top attack missile that's the thinnest armour on a tank and the warhead is behind the guidance unit to give better stand off for the heat warhead.

this precision is saving a lot of lives, on or off the battlefield for both countries.

Lancet,the penicillin for Leopold!

4:41 this extra speed has *ridiculously small* impact on the effect of its cumulative charge (the only one with serious piercing effect on a modern tank). *Such a cumulative charge would pierce the tank anyway, even at zero relative speed.* So talking about the "impact" of speed on armor is quite out of the point. This is even less than some paintballs, and less than falcon birds attacking pigeons. This diving speed is definitely *not what damages an armor.* The military charge does. The only significant advantage of such final approach speed is to make the Lancet *more difficult to intercept.* Otherwise it changes nothing to its effects and only make the targeting more difficult for the operator.

Эта гонка вооружений уносит многие тысячи жизней

Leopard Turret: * Died from Cringe *

The Lancet is a game changer for the Russian forces. DEADLY!!

Well the entry requirement to build these types of things are becoming ever lower. Lots of control systems for drones out there. FPV drone control with whatever design, with payload of whatever available munitions, network link, and maybe download map data and some image recognition to make it autonomous if network link is lost and it will loiter, identify and strike after launched. And so many hobbyists out there building drones, we will see many many variants of these things in war now. Begun, the drone wars has.

The Lacet Drones are very reliable. The have flown mission for Gazprom Pipeline network for years at least 7+ and the X-wing design is easier and mor stable as Quad copter ones. The electro Motor is very silent and not to compare to Go-card motors in the Turkish Drone.

Lancets and leopards are made for each other😂

Not only that but that Leopard photo was taken at a ballistic shock test site.

MISLEADING THUMBNAIL: The Leopard in the thumbnail has rolled over during an exercise in Poland and has not been hit by a drone or projectile.

Why do the APU lose so many people and equipment during attacks on the "Surovikin line": analysis of the Military Chronicle The Ukrainian offensive has slowed down so much that after a while it may turn into positional battles. Why is this happening? Have the APU reached the "Surovikin line" or not yet? The defensive structures of the "Surovikin line" along the entire length are built along the dominant heights and ridges. The defense is installed at a depth of 25-30 kilometers. Several separate protective zones have been erected between the defensive lines. In zone No. 1, closer to the front, there is an advanced line of defense consisting of several dozen platoon and company strongpoints. Those Ukrainian units that managed to break through the minefields came across these areas with a huge number of ATGMs and surveillance equipment. Between the advanced fortified area and the main line of defense there are about 25 kilometers of minefields, anti-tank ditches and other structures, it is almost impossible to break through them. The only achievement of the APU offensive at the moment is the advance in the "gray zone" - an area that does not affect the combat capability of Russian troops. At the same time, artillery and aircraft from the depths of the "Surovikin line" strike the advancing Ukrainian troops long before the main forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine approach not only to the front line of protection, but also to minefields. What is wrong with the advance of the APU to the "Surovikin line"? Despite the transfer of German Leopard-2 tanks and hundreds of Soviet-type tanks to the offensive area, Ukrainian formations interact poorly with each other. Often they engage in battle in an unfamiliar area, without coordinating actions with neighboring units, without up-to-date intelligence information and without fire support, as well as without centralized management. In a number of cases, instead of units prepared for the assault, mechanized brigades that had already lost parts of heavy equipment were thrown to break through to the front line of the guard. The main task of such units is to occupy captured positions and hold them, as well as to clean up pockets of resistance, and not to storm positions controlled by the enemy. Such cases are not uncommon due to the shortage of experienced commanders who die during strikes on command posts of battalions and brigades. Due to misunderstanding of the situation and incorrect orders, elite units, such as the 137th and 88th battalions of the 35th Marine Brigade, as well as units of the 37th Infantry Brigade of the AFU, are suffering particularly heavy losses. These formations advanced to the assault of the advanced guard lines exclusively on light vehicles - Oshkosh M-ATV and HTSV Wolfhound armored vehicles, as well as French AMX-10RC - equipment not suitable for breaking through echeloned defense. The scheme with the creation of local, seemingly safe paths, but essentially representing a fire bag has already been used by the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation both during the battles in the Sukhoi Stavka area in the Kherson region, as well as in the "Bakhmut meat grinder", a hand in the creation of which was also applied by General Surovikin. What losses did the APU have in the offensive and what reserves remained? During the 17 days of the offensive, the losses of the AFU amounted to approximately 17-20 battalions killed and wounded, which is equivalent to 16 thousand people or five brigades of 3,500 people each. In total, about 5 brigades out of 9 trained and equipped according to NATO standards were allegedly involved in the APU offensive, which means that more than half of the reserves prepared for the strike have already been destroyed. In fact, the "Surovikin line" is gradually becoming a "second Bakhmut" for the Ukrainian army - more and more troops are needed for combat operations in this area, which, in addition to sending reserves, have to be removed from the front in Limansk, Kupyansk and other directions.

While looking at these photos my first question is “why are the Ukrainian’s luster Ed so close together, spread out!

The extraordinary thing about the Lancet is its price, in fact according to various experts, its price varies between $10k and $20k which makes it an exceptional weapon. with $20k the Russians are making a massacre of NATO material. A Leo 2A6 costs $4 million.

The Lancet it's working thanks from the chips and electronic components of the west washer machine and dish washer machine as well.

What info do you have to back this up? I’m not aware they have Lancet3 and never have?

This will be a lesson for NATO for their future tank designs.

VERY WELL EXPLAINED, including accurate success rates included. BUT: just FYI to some viewers, some footages are of Ka-52 launching ATGM (Anti-Tank Guided Missiles) such as their latest example: VIHR / VIKHR which has a very strong Anti-Tank RHA penetration (first used in March 2022 iirc).

Determined by flight time and radar capture; almost all data links are able to be disabled by high-powered/directed microwave emissions using IR directed scattered arrays led by Radar/Frequency Range Finders and High Speed Frequency Hop processors. The problems aren't just the tanks and the munitions, the problems are are also not utilizing appropriately deployed forward Defense Tactical-Interceptor Communtions Systems.

Der Turm vom Leo fliegt zwar nicht so hoch, aber er fliegt😂

they said russian weapons are inferior to the west hehe

It's great that it can hit moving targets too

Tank are Battleship on land, supposedly tanking damage and bring short range bombardment to the enemy. If tank requires combined arms team to execute, so does BB. But unlike tanks, BB has no countermeasures to stop her munition, not even a bunker

6:00 isnt Lancet, it is a guided missile "Vikhr" launched from ka-52

Я думаю это не последняя конфигурация, схема с Х образным опереним, так и напрашивается крылья сделать покороче, а движатель установить ракетный а на системе управления слегка подправить прошивку.

So the new future Leo version must have an early warning drone attack and suicide explode auto switch. When they detect drones coming, they'll explode themself. So they can boast in advertising that their tank has never been destroyed by a drone.

Fascinating video, incidentally, i wonder who thought painting that radar system white was a good idea ?

Hype without facts! The Leopard tanks referred to as “destroyed by Lancet” at 5:06 were stopped by minefields then later finished by a combination of artillery, lancets and FPV drones. I’m not aware of a documented instance on Oryx of a Lancet destroying a mobile and undamaged Leopard tank.

It's a drone and the target is a tank it's bloody obvious

Cumulative is the russian word for heat rounds. I don't think it explodes from a standoff distance. Heat rounds are like a javelin or rpg it has to hit the target physically. The source I read says the standoff explosion one is the fragmentation one, that is so that the fragments shower the troops and equipment, like they used on that radar truck for iris t system

“Hey, you can't park there"

The music that you have use on this video is very nice.... can tell me the name of the music?

What is the price of one piece of lancet 3 compared to one piece of leopard 2??

Lancet is much deadly than the american switch blade 600. Its all over tg the video of lancet while 300 and 600 are really few

If the Kalashnikov concern is responsible for production , hundreds of thousands of them will be released in the near future

So far we habe 1 Video of Lancet vs Leopard where it set off the smoke launchers.

I didn't know the leopard was meant to fight aerospace targets?

All the film, or "footage," I EVER see coming from anywhere, and from anyone, in Ukraine is so cut and spliced its hard to know for sure whats really happening anyway. I wish we were able to have a higher confidence in what we are actually seeing... Except for stuff that is geolocated by a second or third entity I'd be very suspect of any 'footage' we see.

What is the timestamp in video where the Lancet hit the Leopard 2A6?

The leopard in the thumbnail had its turret dislodged during a military exercise when a second leopard ran into it at speed and climbed over it. Nothing to do with drones of any kind, lancet included. Notice there was no blackening of the hull from an explosion or fire!

I saw Abrams M1 tanks taken out at close range in the towns in Iraq, with rpg7's

The lancet is efficient because it costs a fraction of the price of one round that the Leo can fire with its 120mm. No matter if you need 4 lancet to destroy a tank, it is efficient... Even the best protected tank can be destroyed by a bottle of beer filled with ignited oil and gazoline. the molotov cocktail. The Leo has a terrible weak point on front of the turret that IS NOT PROTECTED AT ALL: the gunner's primary sight... The A6 is improved on this point (the device has been deported higher to get a next to complete frontal mantlet), but the issue still exists.

6:02 I really don't understand why the Lancet-3 video contains footage from Ka-52 strikes utilizing Vikhr ATGM 🤷‍♂

The tank on the thumbnail is actually the first leopard tank destroyed during this conflict, and it's not even destroyed by russians, it's destroyed by Ukrainians with another leopard 😄.It was during their training in Poland. The other leopard was reversing and it's crew didn't see the tank behind them , so it crushed into the leopard behind, popping it's turret out by hitting the main gun from underneath with it's rear side.

It is amazing how this cheap russian drone can take down sophisticated military equipment worth tens of millions of dollars. The west needs to learn a lot from Russia specifically in this regard,

So far, there are no confirmed destructions of Bradley and Leopard using Lancet drones. Too small a combat unit does not allow us to count on the effective destruction of Western equipment with serious armor protection. In addition, the Lancet drone can operate only during daylight hours, without creating problems for night movements of equipment of the Ukrainian army.

There goes the microchip of my washing machine , placed in a Alibaba RC Toy

Unless a way can be created to eliminate drone's ability to function within a battle space, not only are tanks obsolete, but all forms of mechanized warfare are obsolete.

And what is the cost benefit analysis? What is the cost of an average target vs cost of the Lancet 3, factoring in accuracy. Are any Lancet 3's getting shot down, or missing their targets?

5:48 - those are not drones, but Ka-52-launched air-to-ground guided anti-tank "Вихрь" rockets.

Lancet 4 is coming soon...it will have better warhead, bigger flight duration, and lock target accuracy

The destroyed/damaged leopard 2 tanks from this video did get hit by mines and not by drones... There are many videos about this leopard graveyard.

It could also attack in bad weather to increase it's chance of survival if enemy is using lasers to shoot it down. Lasers don't work well in heavy rain or fog.

I wouldn’t be surprised if it had a triple EFP charge to punch through anything

This war saw a major shift in cheap striking power in the form of disposable drones being more available to a lot more countries, even countries as isolated and hit by sanctions as Iran ... this is changing warfare in a major way, almost as significantly as the arrival of gunpowder did. The wars of today and tomorrow are going to be ever more wars of drones.

The real gamechanger/wunderwaffe of this war, so far😁👍

The Leopards drove on mines, it wasnt destroyed by lancet. The lancet hit the leopard after it drove on mine but it wasnt really destroyed, it only showed white smoke.

Surprised they haven’t tried adding some kind of defense for these drones

The problem is that Gepards have being destoying this Lancet drones in great quantities.

With the Lancet Joke, i see only smoke

Good promotion for KA-52 and Lancet in this war.

"BOOM"

4:00 why does this infographics indicate lancet's camera module as a warhead?

Holy crap. At 2:46, look at all those DESTROYED vehicles... Looks like a total disaster is going on over there.

That leopard and those Bradley's have already been reported as damaged in a minefield .

Man, those shovels and refrigerators are striking hard. The world is a jungle and europe my little garden, Joseph Burro el

Кто первым освоит управление бактериями , тот будет иметь защиту от любого оружия. Для этого нужна сущая малость -- научиться совершенствовать среду обитания . . .

Does active protection even work? Seems anti-tank munitions and big payload drones are still knocking them out of the fight. Is there any footage of them even working? Not stock footage, but in the field in a combat situation?

Wrong news. The Leo2 A6 here was hit by artillery strike and a tank mine… after all an abondened other A6 was hit by an lancet but obly hit the fire security system. Not more…

Would be curious about how US' Switchblade loitering munition is doing in Ukraine. I have not heard of it too much.

That video of a gaggle of disabled / destroyed armor seems to include tracks missing from every one. That's mines, not a drone.

i dont know where are thos ewestern advanced active protective things like Iron Fist? or they are ineffective?

As war goes on, weapon becomes deadlier or get obsoleted