*Please cite source for the 12 "Downed" SU -34's because the reports were NEVER verified*

It won't be surprising if west start calling you pro Russia 😂

The Russians build beautiful, tough fighter planes.

Can be fitted with hypersonic shovels

Well... one is a bomber, the other is a fighter...

Wow, I was just wondering how powerful the Su-35 was, and thank you for the useful information.

Beautiful aircraft

Su-35 doesn't have canards, the Su-30 and 37 do.

Wel one is a bomber that has to operates close to the frontlines the other can keep a safe distance... that mey be the most decisive factor

Depending on where you read, patriots don’t actually hit much….

The simple truth is that Fullbacks are far more likely to operate over Ukraine than Flankers.

Su-35S - UFO 😎💪

You're the first to tell the truth,we're always told of how best is the F35 and Patriots miss8

It's like that scene in Top Gun Maverick when the enemy G turned that Missile

Thought it has 9G, Su 35 cannot counter F 15 in dogfight.

The missiles on outside of the jet give off a signature that is picked up on radar from MASH.

su 35 terbukti di medan laga mampu mengatasi situasi sulit di.tengah rapatnya pertahanan udara ukraina

The SU-35 is an exceptional fighter but you totally neglected to mention that Ukraine uses PAC-2 Patriot batteries, not the newest 360radar batteries, not even PAC-3. I recommend people check LTAMDS Radar for Patriot.

They said that G-turns are only for airshow.

Both Su-34 and Su-35 have Ground Radar Geolocator and ECM Khibiny module on wingtips. But Patriot Radar is not AESA only Phased Array. To evade Patriot Pac2 missile, 3D Thrust Vectoring on Su-35 and Patriot old Radar are key factors. When Su-35's MWR alerts pilot, pilot can do zero or very low air speed mode (like unflying object) using 3D Thrust Vectoring to deceive the radar and lost target lock via TVM. Why 2 numbers Su-35 were hit? Aircrafts are not everythig. Pilots (manned or AI) can differ.

The missile definitely has the advantage. It doesn't have a pilot inside limiting the g-forces and also has lower mass meaning less inertia.

When was the last time Patriot Missile targeted and hit Su-35 ?

The graphic used the DDE 599........Full Send It

SU34 is also a very maneuverable jet it’s a bomber that can go head to head in to a dog fight with fighter jets such as F-18 F16 and F15.

Where are these F-35B, F-35A, F-35C fighter jets hiding in the West and america man??🙈

Not bad for broke washing machine parts.

U can not believe what Uraine they will say anything to make people believe they are winning the lost war😂😂

To do tight high g evasive manuever is taking toll on the pilot. Most of time patriot launch a volley of 2 missile upon lock. So to evade those 2 missile is quite hard. And if su35 manage to do this, it was a very good feat.

I think it's not the hardware but the pilot. The pilots desire to live and experience is the key to survival.

There's NO Carnards on the 35.. He said there was?

along with this video, I recommend listening to the song 'just dream on', a great combination

no plain can outturn a missle. there must be some electronic war fair involved, that's like claiming a tracker trailer can outturn a go-cart.

SU 35 doesn't have canards. One of the prototypes did though. SU 34 has canards.

YOU BETTER do a G turn if you want to be live!

'Lotta adjectives here without the necessary qualification that manoeuverability means little without a _very _*_well trained pilot_* to use it. More likely the Su-34s have proven vulnerable because of their mission profiles : high altitude glide bomb runs as opposed to the Su-35s hanging back or staying low. ---- Best way to beat a Patriot is to break line-of-sight from it's ground radar *as early as possible.* The nose radars of the PAC-2 missiles don't have great range and are mostly for accurate terminal guidance.

Very agile and highly manoeuvrable fighter aircraft in the world.

I shouldn't believe on that videos said patriot missile can destroy any plane

I think the future of drone fighters will be able to turn a lot more aggressive.

The US have received full intelligence on the SU35; I must say the cannon on that sob is really something!

Let me get this straight: A fighter is more maneuverable than a bomber? Who knew??

Su-34 are bombers, and therefore, they're very heavy aircrafts while the su-35 are fighter jet relatively light when compared to the su-34.

do you have the actual footage? or this is all talk?

He shows a Su35 dropping flares! Lmao even the stinger manpad has a very good chance of taking one down. That's why Russian pilots do not do direct close in air support. It has anti- flare software and is being constantly improved.

True justice will depend on who is making the video😂😂😂

An amazing video, thank you for posting it. I have few points tho: 1- you have my upmost respect for being biased on your video. When it comes to anything Russian, western tends to say stupid things. 2- we always forget that Russians are fighting in Ukraine the whole NATO countries with cutting edge technology air defence systems! We’ve seen some casualties but we also seen many casualties in these air defence systems! 3- comparing that war with any war that US air force had, we will see that none of them had a decent army equipped with air defence or capable fighters to know the exact strength of them. 4- wondering how both S-400 vs Patriot would react when fighting 5th gen or good fighters like F-18 or SU-34 !!??? Only time will tell and. I think the clash will eventually soon happen since Russian army is taking control and momentum day after day.

I want them so bad in War Thunder. Need that CAS plane, to replace my sub-sonic premium Su-25bm.

Su-34 only need a ecm modernization and twc engines .

Washing machine technology at its best❤❤❤

Do they have cope cages

Thanks God we have Russian Telegram to see everything from other side .

You could literally not be further from correct in how you describe the interplay of a missile and an aircraft in a high g turn. The turn does not in any way effect the missile's radar lock on the aircraft. Turning the aircraft forces the missile to turn, bleeding its energy away due to friction, causing it to slow down, lose effective range, and run out of momentum before it can strike the aircraft.

Very well done, quite educational. Regards from a Canadian friend, Liam

Because the patriot was destroyed long before the Su-35 took off😂

Dedicated long range strike bomber with combat range of 680miles....!?!

This is a direct copy of Defense Tv's video

Very Interested to see this Aircraft Identification and Comparison video. Somethimes the Soviet and Russian numbers get me lost. I once has an Su-2x something that was a DOS simulator down to releasing the parking brake then accelerating and taking off, and this was in EZ Mode! (I didn't have pedals or joystick, etc & keyboarding was very tough)

We need to see you in person reporting.Strive to show your self

SU 35 also has insane EW abilities. Able to make the missile go stupid.

We want the videos to have Turkish subtitles.🙏

Maybe that was a really good pilot. You need more data to see if it was a one off.

SU-35 has no canards

Patriot should not be used for that, there are more suitable missiles for that purpose.

Maybe because the dont have to pay 90,000$ for a bag of turbine bushing

Just because Ukraine posted the picture, you guys already believed it?

It flies at home

What a beautifull and powerful machine, sadly for killing people 😢 like other machines

🇷🇺🇨🇳🇮🇷>>>>>>>

There were no Patriot missiles in Ukraine but there were downed su 35’s

Wasn't this video made before?!

Is not the plane, is the pilot...

Patriots in Ukraine will be in vital areas not on the front line their kill range is fairly short and the Russian jets have been staying out of it pretty simple really.

So this guy say SU-3x pilot strategy to defend from a 160km range Patriot missile is hand dodging it using supermanouvrability?? Come on guys ... really??? Who the hack is dogfighting these days - well, except of course a fight in the DCS with some Spitfires of the WWII. Even F4 Phantom was designed without a cannon...

this analyzed Su-35 against Patriots antiair defense is a Russians say; Don't forget Patriots shut down Russia's Kinzel hypersonic missiles with 9 time the speed of sound.

wrong usage of the su 34 on the begining

Patriot is not designed for a ground attack that is what the russian airforce does best is stay on the ground because they are running short of together s300 missile 😂😂😂😂😂

Top G

new planes are usually better for you and worse for your enemy systems .

12 su35 destroyed vs 500 Ukrainian plains destroyed by S400 and S300 begs a question about effectiveness to cost ratio of Patriot system

Answer: it is not. Just get into the range a scary bird ;-)

It's not hard that's why Soo many got shot down Soo far

Google Nine reasons the Russian Air Force lost more than 26 Su-35, 36 Su-34 and 2 A-50 Early Warning Aircraft.

Russia Soviet Union USSR are all the same thing the hell with initials Raymond Paul Sullivan III

The Su 35 is more powerful jet than the American made F22 and F35 in terms of real combat operations. Can anyone explain if one was shot down by the patriot air defense system in Ukraine war?

They are hard to hit, because they stay out of rsnge

Bravo Iran

F16 pilots - hold my bear

Very Briefed And Summarized Ideas: I think that the Russians should experiment by converting part of their stock of obsolete fighter-bomber aircrafts into attack drones, and try to seize air supremacy over cities and vital sectors of the Ukrainian geography... Russia has a stock of MiG-23/27 and MiG-29 that can be developed into fighter/strike drones after providing them with technology that enhances survivability, supplying them with radar warning receiver rwr/ missile approach warning receiver mawr and then using them in the form of air masses or large formations from several air divisions to try to seize air supremacy or st least the air superiority over important parts of Ukrainian geography... It is possible to launch hundreds of guided combat drones (MiG-29, MiG-27, MiG-23) towards, for example, the capital, Kiev, and at the same time use the Su-35 or MiG-31 from the skies over Belarus equipped with the Kh-31p anti radiation missile or any tactical surface-to-air missile with hypersonic properties to conduct (DEAD or SEAD) missions destroying enemy air defense systems or suppressing enemy air defense systems and gradually gaining the air supremacy over the Kiev oblast at least above 6000m. By the way, I think it is possible to develop a model of the r33/37 air2air with a ranges between 200 and 400km with speed of 4.5mach&6 mach, to be anti-radation missile, although the 60 kg payloads is considered much less than comparable anti radiation missiles but this weight is much heavier than the 6kg useful payloads of the 155/152mm laser guided artillery rounds which is used effectively in destroying heavy air defense systems across Ukrainian theaters of operations. for example, I think the r37 is supposed to have the ability to homing on the electromagnetic sensors (radars) carried by the AWACS and JSTAR aircraft, not only homing on the large radar cross-section of those aircraft's, these qualities should qualifyed the heavy long range air2air missile to engage the ground and naval based radar systems...

good info session but wrong from the start.

Russia has a record , ucranian mig 29 shot down via air to air missile on 417km.

You do know the Patriot missile system was never designed for anti aircraft. It was designed for missile defense. If a country has taken a missile defense system and is using it effectively as a anti aircraft system. That means the opposing air force just sucks.

I love Russian fighter aircrafts...they are beautifully designed... elegant to look , robust build ❤ imagine how SU 57 would be...it's simply stunning 🫶

But yet over two years fighting mighty Russia doesn't have air superiority? Even with these planes? Makes you wonder how bad their air force really is. Plus they have lost many A-50s by friendly fire etc. according to Russian officials.

Because the patriots doesn't speak russian .

Patriots air defense systems is expensive junk

SU 35 usually shot down by S400😅😅😅

One occasion is hardly the basis for proven fact, perhaps the Patriot was faulty? Tell Putler to send 50 within range of the Patriot batteries, then we can begin to assess if there are significant differences - say 15% surviving instead of 5% perhaps?

Vector delay and geometry

I like Russia jets but modern day all jets can be brought down doesnt matter hoe advanced they are.

this fighter is usless,,sure dont used patriot to take this stuff down just AIM-26 trust me this SU will hit. Good manouvre is just for marketing issue since it only could be done in low speed say 300km/hr maks in super sonic dont think that it could make it...

Viva Russia