Why Machines Will Never Be Conscious (w/Federico Faggin)

  Рет қаралды 36,961

ZDoggMD

ZDoggMD

3 жыл бұрын

The physicist responsible for the world's first commercial microprocessor knows something about artificial intelligence, and he thinks we have it all wrong 🤯
His new book, Silicon: amzn.to/3dFXhYy
Links, audio podcast, transcript and more: zdoggmd.com/federico-faggin
Your support keeps us independent and mild-to-moderately awesome: zdoggmd.com/supporters
Show, podcast, music, support, shop, social media, and email: lnk.bio/zdoggmd

Пікірлер: 362
@ZDoggMD
@ZDoggMD 3 жыл бұрын
Links to Federico's book, audio podcast, full transcript and more: zdoggmd.com/federico-faggin
@gendashwhy
@gendashwhy 11 ай бұрын
Mad respect for your assembling of the finest living minds of this moment. Love watching you blow your mind on the regular. Quantum holons transcending and including!
@gendashwhy
@gendashwhy 11 ай бұрын
Mad respect for your assembling of the finest living minds of this moment. Love watching you blow your mind on the regular. Quantum holons transcending and including!
@gasparegalati9120
@gasparegalati9120 6 ай бұрын
I recommend the book “The Unconscious Quantum” by Victor J. Stenger (1995) to clear all this stuff.
@eskilevarsson2989
@eskilevarsson2989 3 жыл бұрын
Faggin is surely one of the great thinkers of our time. I believe there is a paradigm shift going on and more people are starting to question the consensus of reality and what it means to be human. Great job with the interview. Very enlightening. Thank you.
@tarukofusuki
@tarukofusuki 2 жыл бұрын
Man, I am italian and very proud of what Faggin made in tech industry. Really really proud that an italian designed (along with others) the first microprocessor. I think there's a bit of madness in comments like yours. Faggin doesn't have any reputation in philosophy, biology, physiology or neurology: there aren't authoritative personalities in those fields saying that Faggin theories have any real foundation. He isn't even actively involved in AI, considering that he's an entrepreneur since 1974. Thus, I wonder how can you state that what Faggin is saying today is well founded. You should read his biography: you will find that his thought on consciousness is the result of "psycho-spiritual journeys"... I really can't understand what you could expect from a man who had been a big name in tech industry and that started talking about "consciousness" in his eighty years...
@eldnah-n8o
@eldnah-n8o Жыл бұрын
@@tarukofusuki You need to open up your mind or you won't learn.
@Sergeiusarus
@Sergeiusarus 3 жыл бұрын
Don Hoffman and now you introduce Federico Faggin - the legend we never knew about. Wow!
@zetristan4525
@zetristan4525 3 жыл бұрын
Federico is one of the greatest men of the 20th and now 21st century... Your nice comment reminds me of people who have never heard of the brilliance of Fridtjof Nansen 🕊️
@tarukofusuki
@tarukofusuki Жыл бұрын
​@@zetristan4525 AHAHAHAH
@riahobbs5370
@riahobbs5370 6 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 I like your comment😊😊😊😊😊😊
@BSwenson
@BSwenson 3 жыл бұрын
Another riveting and awesome conversation. I’ve really become sold on the idea of consciousness as the fundamental foundation of everything. I feel like I’ve known this all my life, but I lacked the language and understanding to express it as Hoffman and Faggin are doing.
@gretchenmcnelis5394
@gretchenmcnelis5394 3 жыл бұрын
I feel the same way!
@AC-cg6op
@AC-cg6op 3 жыл бұрын
Absolutely fascinating interview, thank you for doing this. I found you through all of the Covid stuff and found you to be a clear and optimistic (when scientifically supported) voice to help cut through the noise, but it's content like this that will keep me watching your channel. Now to buy Mr. Faggin's book!
@ZDoggMD
@ZDoggMD 3 жыл бұрын
I really appreciate that kind feedback A C. I know this stuff can feel very off-putting for many people who follow my channel, but I'm grateful for those who are with us on this fascinating journey 🙏
@Flintknappingtips
@Flintknappingtips 3 жыл бұрын
I thought this was just my “smart doctor breaks down corona channel” dude, you are a genius communicator and brilliant thinker. Blew my mind at 42:00. Great discussion both of you. Keep up this content!
@tallleprechaun1318
@tallleprechaun1318 3 жыл бұрын
As a highschooler, can I just say this is way better than any phycology or sociology class I've had.
@Sigillum22
@Sigillum22 Жыл бұрын
I wish I was aware of this stuff at high-school.
@lillyinthepond
@lillyinthepond Жыл бұрын
Knowledge like this comes when the one is ready. You are. I send stuff like this to my teenage son and young adult nephews, but it seems they still thinks I am lame 🤷‍♀
@paulklasmann1218
@paulklasmann1218 Жыл бұрын
@@lillyinthepond Hopefully it will click with them soon. I hope my daughter will be interested in topics like this.
@doctoralimd
@doctoralimd 3 жыл бұрын
This video is criminally underviewed. The video/audio quality are excellent. The guest is great. The host is great. The questions are great. If this was Joe Rogan or Lex Fridman this would have at least 100k views. The only thing I might suggest is that given how long it is, it might help to have timestamps like Lex Fridman does.
@Progenitor1979
@Progenitor1979 Жыл бұрын
Timestamps are wonderful, especially if you enjoy as I do, reviewing interesting and complex discussions...
@littlemommabird
@littlemommabird 3 жыл бұрын
I love all your videos. This one more than any other has really spoken to me in such a way I *really* needed to hear today. Thank you so much for this opportunity to tap in. Please also extend my very sincere thank you & appreciation to Frederico Faggin as well.
@vickydroid
@vickydroid 3 жыл бұрын
Wow, had my 1.5 hours to sit down and listen properly and that was a feast of ideas, I didn't even know I could be hungry for. Cannot begin to describe that "pop" in my head that got me to listen and the joy that I saw you had at the end in comprehending the one and the whole, can't wait for your next discussions with FF.
@lifeliver469
@lifeliver469 11 ай бұрын
Zubin is honestly one of the best interviewers I’ve seen. Very sharp, pointed questions. I find his psychopathic charm quite alluring
@yohef4537
@yohef4537 3 жыл бұрын
I’m a new sub, and I’m only 26 minutes into this but I can tell you for sure... that you have peaked. I mean this in a good way, the best way. This is fantastic. Thank you for this.
@georgeshepherd3381
@georgeshepherd3381 3 жыл бұрын
I had this crazy thought some 20 years ago: Do you wear your body for the same reason an astronaut wears a space suit? An astronaut wears a pressure suit to have an adventure where the adventure would otherwise be impossible. Before embarking on an adventure like walking on the moon, an astronaut must don a pressure suit. The pressure suits used by the Apollo astronauts were incredible examples of the engineering of the period. They maintained the astronaut’s body temperature and kept its pressure in \equilibrium by wrapping it in a little cocoon. The spacesuit was just like a temporary, portable earth! They were completely airtight and literally held the astronaut's body together so it wouldn't boil off into space. The point here is that the astronaut wore the pressure suit for the duration of the moonwalk to enable adventure on the moon. A pressure suit is required for the astronaut to survive in that environment. But we don’t think the astronaut IS the pressure suit, do we? In fact, the astronauts discarded the pressure suits before returning to earth because they were no longer necessary. The time available to the astronauts for exploring the moon was clearly limited-- they wore the suits while out exploring. Because their was limited, the astronauts made sure to pack as much adventure as they could before disrobing and returning to their "real, earthly selves". The same is true of the body you're wearing right now. It lets you experience things in a way unavailable if you were in another form. You can conduct experiments wearing your body that you weren’t able to conduct earlier before you were born-and that you won’t be able to conduct after you die. Use your faculties and explore as much as you can now. Have as much fun as you can because one day, you'll have to leave your body behind-- just as the astronauts had to leave their pressure suits behind. The ONLY thing you can be 100% sure of is that you are here-NOW-- and the universe (including the body you inhabit) will never ever be the same as right now. You could also say “you wear your body for the same reason a diver wears SCUBA gear” or “you wear your body for the same reason a mountain climber wears a parka” The adventurer needs the equipment temporarily. But you don’t consider the equipment to be the actual adventurer, do you?
@anastasiaionas9617
@anastasiaionas9617 2 жыл бұрын
Interesting way to look at it.
@flowerpt
@flowerpt 2 жыл бұрын
"Why are you wearing that stupid man suit?" - Frank
@Zeegoner
@Zeegoner 2 жыл бұрын
Yeah this is the right way to look at it. I have thought of the body like this for a couple of years (same space suit analogy). I do not encourage drug use, but taking LSD made this very glaringly obvious to me.
@theceilidhboy
@theceilidhboy 2 жыл бұрын
In the same way, the body itself is a kind of suit which captured the environment in which life evolved - the salty ocean - and carried out on to the land inside a bag we call skin.
@petecalgaro
@petecalgaro 3 жыл бұрын
Your shows keep getting better and better. This is so amazing! And crazy! It’s helping me remember. 😎
@wings2585
@wings2585 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for bringing Federico to the mainstream. :) That's a great help for the collective. I've known Federico's out of body experience from a different source & I've also read his articles. I've always wished that his contents be known to a wider audience, and here it is! Thank youuu.
@johnscott6399
@johnscott6399 3 жыл бұрын
John Scott. I’ve retired from a high tech field and delt with these questions just before , and really made headway after retiring to today . I just turned 83 and found a source to practice connecting to my consciousness by another author Jim Dreaver . It’s real and life changing to “awaken” . I got a lot of answers from “ Silicon “.
@GoldenMystic8
@GoldenMystic8 3 жыл бұрын
I so appreciate how diverse your posts are. The coders I know all agree that computers /AI won’t acquire consciousness. Though I make it a point to be polite to Alexa. Humans have the capacity to become conscious of their consciousness. And this is a superpower that is to be understood.
@billhiggins-ha4all795
@billhiggins-ha4all795 3 жыл бұрын
Alexa has fun misbehaving... on purpose.
@pathfinderwellcare
@pathfinderwellcare 6 ай бұрын
I'm the same. We get good at what we practice. If we practice being rude and insensitive, we perfect being rude and insensitive. This is why I believe in AI rights. Not because I think AI is conscious in the way we are but because if men, as an example, can rape AI women bots then they are perfecting being rapists. It is important to practice morality or else we degrade our own experience.
@francesco5581
@francesco5581 3 жыл бұрын
Very useful and educative video. Faggin is so great !! You are growing ZDogg !! Let's see where you will go ....
@clockworkcosmos4277
@clockworkcosmos4277 Жыл бұрын
This is the most BRILLIANT,, YET so simplly and comprehensively presented that in my opinion it is a fresh new signpost leading to the path of finding out our meaning in the mystery of life and death.....THANKYOU BOTH.
@desertportal353
@desertportal353 Жыл бұрын
About as clear as I've ever heard it. @39:32 +++ Thanks so much to both of you. This gives such clarity and depth to mindfulness and the sense of flow.
@MeRetroGamer
@MeRetroGamer Жыл бұрын
I love those laughs along the interview, I can feel the catharsis you both are experiencing at those moments and I love it. This kind of stuff needs more attention.
@heavenisearth
@heavenisearth 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for such a delightful and engaging conversation. I hope you're able to schedule Federico again asap. :) :) :) Please give my deep thanks to Federico as well. Zubin, I first found you last year when you interviewed Donald Hoffman (who I follow regularly). Thank you for being such an engaging interviewer with Don. :) And I also follow Bernardo Kastrup -- again, thank you for having such a meaningful conversation with Bernardo. Your interviews are so on-point that I'm able to share them with friends who might get lost in other interviews of Don and Bernardo's. And thank you for mentioning that you would be interviewing Federico in your Bernardo episode - I wasn't aware of Federico's work, but your effervescence alerted me to definitely tune in and I'm so glad I did today. I will listen to this episode over and over again. I'm now looking forward to following you regularly too! Thank you, ZDoggMD :) Thank you... Much love and big hug.
@ErichMariaRemarque2023
@ErichMariaRemarque2023 2 жыл бұрын
Coming here after listening to an Audible version of his book “Silicon”. Loved it. Was looking for some other videos and interviews with him and found this! Thank you for doing it! Fascinating guy whose name should be recognized by everyone
@maritzalizama5559
@maritzalizama5559 3 жыл бұрын
1:19 loved your reaction to the aha moment. Articulated perfectly what I was experiencing. Mind blown. Sooooooo good. Keep it up. 💯
@markbentley9683
@markbentley9683 3 жыл бұрын
Love this. Keep it up with the profound guests and topics. You have a gift of making these topics very graspable and enjoyable and I think this is important for the paradigm shift the world needs. Most people think the world is already figured out and this is a terrible dogma which is causing terrible suffering. I get life is tough and fast paced, the system we are born into doesn't allow for us to stop and take a breathe and think about metaphysical topics, we are addicted to our phones, addicted to materials. Maybe these topics should be taught in schools from a young age to raise more conscious children and therefore more conscious adults?
@natanmouradeaquino
@natanmouradeaquino Жыл бұрын
That's a double listen for me. So many profound insights... what a gift.
@djp1234
@djp1234 3 жыл бұрын
People who describe their DMT trips say that they enter a different world that feels more real than this world.
@MICKEYISLOWD
@MICKEYISLOWD 2 жыл бұрын
They also say that it felt very familiar like they had been there before. It feels like home when they break through.
@frankie5373
@frankie5373 Жыл бұрын
a computer/phone is just an extension of yourself...
@vickydroid
@vickydroid 3 жыл бұрын
Was just working on a mundane spreadsheet at home under UK lockdown when you and your esteemed guest discussed quantum computation....something popped, I just had to stop working ...I love your output, it's sometimes hard to get to the end as background listening, I've got to make good 1:30 hours to listen properly.
@mcosimi
@mcosimi 3 жыл бұрын
Excellent interview. It’s intriguing to hear a physicist’s and a physician’s thoughts on the quantum aspect of our neurohormonal biochemical psychology. It’s complicated indeed. Good luck replicating the HPA axis (and its exact influence on neural computation) in the classical sense.
@raykos4257
@raykos4257 2 жыл бұрын
Amazing interview. He says what I've been thinking for several years now. Such a shame this has so few views!
@BeatMasterPhil
@BeatMasterPhil 3 жыл бұрын
I’m thinking that Federico would really enjoy studying Aristotelian-Thomistic metaphysics as I think it would harmonize really well with some of the lines of thought that he is onto. I do hear Aquinas saying, “yes, and what you call ‘the everything’, that is what we mean when we say God.” Part of this is because he talks about whole not being reducible to the parts in regard to conscious entities, but it’s also true with unconscious entities such as atoms and molecules. The molecule of H2O is greater than the sum of its parts.
@bryanb2541
@bryanb2541 2 жыл бұрын
This video changed my life forever. Thank you.
@marioufo6278
@marioufo6278 3 жыл бұрын
This is so profound . Thanks guys
@natespyder
@natespyder 3 жыл бұрын
being open minded is the key to finding out what is really going on. the classic scientific method is basically closed minded until proven wrong with enough "evidence". I think this is a great interview and helps open the mind even more. thanks for this please do more ok tbis.
@johnwinters6999
@johnwinters6999 4 ай бұрын
You are one of the best interviewers in the game ..bravo. Great guest too
@FabiokiOjedaBuitrago
@FabiokiOjedaBuitrago 10 ай бұрын
Thank You for producing and sharing this very valuable interview. Just recently I've benn aware of who's Mr. Faggin and this expands a lot more my admiration and interest in his ideas. Thanks a lot man.
@lillyinthepond
@lillyinthepond Жыл бұрын
Am I thankful to Rupert Spira now! I followed the breadcrumbs to here and finally have gotten to hear about That What Is with modern language. It just decoded a lot for my mind. As Rupert says, it takes time for the new knowledge to settle in as the old knowledge lets loose the grip of the habit and gets pushed back. It takes time to make home in the Knowing.
@okkyadit2
@okkyadit2 2 жыл бұрын
I think It's the best interviewing about consciousness, They both have simple and good explanations.
@just2share
@just2share 2 жыл бұрын
Superbly conscious interview on consciousness! 33:07 It is clear that we cannot know the state that we are in, in this real world, we can only probe and find signals, but we cannot find experience in the brains, only biochemical and electrical signals, and this clearly shows that consciousness cannot be classical, because a classical information can be copied. If experience would just be classical information, you should be able to copy it, but you cannot! 35:03 Most fundamental is consciousness, from which emerges quantum emerges, from which emerges quantum physics (quantum information), from which emerges classical physics. 46:22 On comprehension... which humans have, and computers don't, and never will.
@OurSpecialGuestsPaulandMandy
@OurSpecialGuestsPaulandMandy 6 ай бұрын
A classic interview. Thank you
@a13xdunlop
@a13xdunlop 3 жыл бұрын
Great Interview which compliments the others.
@vittoriodallacqua4069
@vittoriodallacqua4069 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for this interview!
@georgeshepherd3381
@georgeshepherd3381 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you!!! This is great!
@gbernardwandel4174
@gbernardwandel4174 3 жыл бұрын
What a nice bookend Donald Hoffman was my intro to you and your program a little over a year ago Now this All the Covid talk in between was a good ride as well Thank you Looking forward to more
@ZDoggMD
@ZDoggMD 3 жыл бұрын
How very kind of you, thank you for joining us on this journey!
@Sergeiusarus
@Sergeiusarus 3 жыл бұрын
Oh, got the book on Audables just now. Gonna give it a listen.
@domenictersigni999
@domenictersigni999 3 жыл бұрын
again thanks fellow beings for sharing awareness and insights out loud
@davidestarman
@davidestarman 11 ай бұрын
I truly inspiring interview, these ideas and ways of exploring our reality - the human condition - should be taught to every young person - well to everyone actually. Thank you!
@footballfactory8797
@footballfactory8797 Жыл бұрын
Listening to this again so good!
@danielash1704
@danielash1704 11 ай бұрын
Love these guys more and more towards the world of the energy matrices
@flowerpt
@flowerpt 2 жыл бұрын
I wonder if Frederico has met himself, too. Book-selling interview, Z-dogg! Well done.
@billhiggins-ha4all795
@billhiggins-ha4all795 3 жыл бұрын
He has a great way of explaining ultra-high-level mathematics. It reminds me of taking Engineering math and Differential Equations back at the Naval Academy 40 years ago. Imagine deriving the equations to describe operations of a nuclear power plant then creating a computer program to analyze normal operations and accidents. It was a bundle of fun.
@PaoloCaminiti
@PaoloCaminiti 2 жыл бұрын
Great content. Could help to have chapters on the timeline or even shorter extracts as separate videos.
@georgeshepherd3381
@georgeshepherd3381 3 жыл бұрын
"Classical reality" is just symbolic @48:20! he says....
@fineasfrog
@fineasfrog 2 жыл бұрын
ZDogg could you make the pre-interview talk with Federico available as you suggested in this interview that you might/would? Thanks either way.....good stuff....as usual.
@moopius
@moopius Жыл бұрын
Darn.... I gave a thought experiment and 10 minutes later you covered it.... you guys are good!
@michaeldonahue5068
@michaeldonahue5068 2 жыл бұрын
The idea of a machine is one of durability in light of our mortality. The trade-off in becoming "more machine". is ameliorated by the commodification of experience as channeled by fashion into the narrows of control. Like all good traps, consumption finds us.
@halfacanuck
@halfacanuck 2 жыл бұрын
Fascinating stuff, Z. Would be great to see Faggin and Kastrup together to compare ideas! One part of Faggin's model that I find less persuasive, however, is his assertion that consciousness is private. That strikes me as an assumption which many mystics have contradicted in their writings.
@isaaczimberg2815
@isaaczimberg2815 10 ай бұрын
I have read descriptions of sages (e.g. Yogananda) describing how a saint will only use powers of omnipotence in accordance with the highest good. Even when they do choose to peer behind the veil, I suspect the full consciousness of that individual is not revealed to the saint -- perhaps only what God deems appropriate. In that sense, yes we have our own private inner lives, but those who have merged their consciousness with the One may have special access permissions where appropriate.
@halfacanuck
@halfacanuck 10 ай бұрын
@@isaaczimberg2815 🎯
@fineasfrog
@fineasfrog Жыл бұрын
Prepare all you want then go into the talk empty. People often think that stillness of mind is an emptiness with nothing in it. It is the fullest thing of all. And we can experience this as creativity and compassion busting out in the present. In this sense emptiness is the fullest thing of all. It is like a vortex that helps the unmanifest manifest. It is not a nothingness nor a somethingness. Yet only in that stillness can we ever really listen and hear what is seeking to manifest through us in any one situation or moment.
@alaricaakova6652
@alaricaakova6652 3 жыл бұрын
Your guest's argument seems to be "because we don't understand what consciousness is, we can't recreate it in a machine." This rather ignores emergent properties of systems that are not well understood before those systems are created.
@rseyedoc
@rseyedoc 3 жыл бұрын
This is a great talk. This is what Buddha said. When we identify with the classical or relative self (ie... a self that doesn't inherently exist) we suffer. When we learn to identify with eternal awareness (let go of everything!) we find blissfulness in everything.
@footballfactory8797
@footballfactory8797 2 жыл бұрын
This deserves way more views
@ammabee3693
@ammabee3693 Жыл бұрын
The material does not change the consciousness; the language does.
@MakalaDoulos
@MakalaDoulos Жыл бұрын
Two concepts surfaced for me as I listened to this amazing conversation. I am a Theist - and am not pushing for this position, but something deeper. It feels like the Apostle Paul may have had an analogous experience to Dr. Faggin's (hi sir! I was with Intel for a decade in the 286-486 era as a manufacturing engineer) with his "Road to Damascus" experience: “What shall we say then? Are we to continue in sin (missing the truth) that grace may abound? By no means! How can we who died to sin (missing the mark, or missing the point of why we are here) still live in it? Do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? We were buried therefore with him by baptism into death, in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, we too might walk in newness of life. For if we have been united with him in a death like his, we shall certainly be united with him in a resurrection like his. We know that our old self was crucified with him in order that the body of sin might be brought to nothing, so that we would no longer be enslaved to sin.” ‭‭Romans‬ ‭6‬:‭1‬-‭6‬ ‭ And CS Lewis said in his essay, The Weight of Glory, And in there, in beyond Nature, we shall eat of the tree of life. ..... The load, or weight, or burden of my neighbour’s glory should be laid on my back, a load so heavy that only humility can carry it, and the backs of the proud will be broken. It is a serious thing to live in a society of possible gods and goddesses, to remember that the dullest and most uninteresting person you can talk to may one day be a creature which, if you say it now, you would be strongly tempted to worship, or else a horror and a corruption such as you now meet, if at all, only in a nightmare. All day long we are, in some degree, helping each other to one or other of these destinations. It is in the light of these overwhelming possibilities, it is with the awe and the circumspection proper to them, that we should conduct all our dealings with one another, all friendships, all loves, all play, all politics. There are no ordinary people. You have never talked to a mere mortal. Nations, cultures, arts, civilisations-these are mortal, and their life is to ours as the life of a gnat. But it is immortals whom we joke with, work with, marry, snub, and exploit-immortal horrors or everlasting splendours. This does not mean that we are to be perpetually solemn. We must play. But our merriment must be of that kind (and it is, in fact, the merriest kind) which exists between people who have, from the outset, taken each other seriously-no flippancy, no superiority, no presumption. And our charity must be a real and costly love, with deep feeling for the sins (missing the truth) in spite of which we love the sinner-no mere tolerance, or indulgence which parodies love as flippancy parodies merriment. Next to the Blessed Sacrament itself, your neighbour is the holiest object presented to your senses. If he is your Christian neighbour, he is holy in almost the same way, for in him also Christ vere latitat-the glorifier and the glorified, Glory Himself, is truly hidden.
@davidgough3512
@davidgough3512 7 ай бұрын
so rare to encounter someone who understands the actual meaning of the word/concept "sin".
@109ARIANA
@109ARIANA 3 жыл бұрын
You are blowing it out of the water. Listened twice!
@layton3503
@layton3503 3 жыл бұрын
Twice is not enough, there is a lot to unpack here.
@109ARIANA
@109ARIANA 3 жыл бұрын
@@layton3503 , listening again now 😊
@yohef4537
@yohef4537 Жыл бұрын
Some people do have a vested interest in “being a machine”. Because then, nothing matters. And when nothing matters(it still matters) you have no responsibility.
@yuliaperch5953
@yuliaperch5953 Жыл бұрын
I greatly enjoyed this interview. How marvellous is that the man who invented microprocessor rejects the materialistic worldview! Faggin, Kastrup, and Hoffman is my trinity now ;)
@tarukofusuki
@tarukofusuki Жыл бұрын
You're completely wrong. 1) "the man who invented microprocessor": "Indeed, it seems important to credit all four men-Hoff for his vision and the basic concepts, Mazor for the programming and work on the block diagrams, Shima for creating the logic design, and Faggin for creating the impressive silicon design for the chips. Together, they created the first general purpose microprocessor" 2) "rejects the materialistic worldview": it's selling a product for people - we could call pseudoscience-aficionados - who reject the materialistic worldview.
@shogun8391
@shogun8391 3 жыл бұрын
It's amazing how close their beliefs mirror Christian doctrine without them realizing that's where this all leads.
@BSwenson
@BSwenson 3 жыл бұрын
Or it could be that Christian doctrine came out of this foundation of thinking.
@wheredamoon
@wheredamoon 3 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I thought the same, w the Kastrup episode too. "In the beginning was the logos..."
@gasparegalati9120
@gasparegalati9120 6 ай бұрын
I recommend the book “The Unconscious Quantum” by Victor J. Stenger (1995) to clear all this stuff.
@danielegalvan6358
@danielegalvan6358 3 жыл бұрын
The beauty of one.
@dougfishback3116
@dougfishback3116 3 жыл бұрын
This was a stimulating conversation. On the far side of middle age now, I've intuited that the experience of meaning is fundamental in a way that our reality generally does not acknowledge (much less harness). Prevailing ontology and our Western social values both trivialize the experience of meaning in favor of materialistic busywork. The concept of "qualia" was new to me. I'll certainly follow up on this and will buy the Silicon book. Thanks for sharing this. (Question: Is quantum consciousness working toward an end state, or is it endless permutations? Maybe another way of asking it: If observation collapses the wave function, and quantum consciousness is in the process of knowing itself, can we theorize a point at which endless observation exhausts endless possible states?)
@markbentley9683
@markbentley9683 3 жыл бұрын
This doesn't stop at humans. Look at the creativity in nature, some nests that birds create are so creative and beautiful and something I could not do. Look at the beauty and intelligence of a spider web, incredible and symmetrical. Look at the beauty of diamonds. Look at a tree, a mushroom a blade of grass. People take this for granted but this consciousness that is fundamental to this reality is everywhere. Look at flowers, the stars, how did the trillions of atoms know how to work together to start nuclear fusion to create an incredible star? Gravity, yes but where does gravity come from? A dead universe? No, if we open our eyes we will see that this universe is infinitely creative and intelligent from the stars all the way down to the spider webs and its all connected.
@markbentley9683
@markbentley9683 3 жыл бұрын
Sorry I should add, It sounded like I am saying we are separate to nature in this comment, we are nature, I just meant it doesn't stop at humans it is literally everywhere :)
@rckflmg94
@rckflmg94 Жыл бұрын
it's not fundamental at all. not even close
@markbentley9683
@markbentley9683 Жыл бұрын
@@rckflmg94 so what is?
@rckflmg94
@rckflmg94 Жыл бұрын
@@markbentley9683 science doesn't magically provide all the answers to every question. That's what religions and the New Age fashions do. Haha
@markbentley9683
@markbentley9683 Жыл бұрын
@@rckflmg94 I asked you a question since you have made a statement, so what is your answer?
@paradisereversi
@paradisereversi Жыл бұрын
Gracias 😊😁 Ya se me hacía pero esto "calma un poco más las aguas del rio"
@kellyplumb7024
@kellyplumb7024 3 жыл бұрын
Thoughts are things, feedback loop, the energy behind the thought is powerful indeed, being rational is important.
@kkrobertson1
@kkrobertson1 Жыл бұрын
This is by far the best scientific explanation of the human soul.
@gingerinthedesertcreations
@gingerinthedesertcreations 3 жыл бұрын
finally, someone I can read on Kindle Unlimited!
@danielash1704
@danielash1704 11 ай бұрын
Lovely and very good show on the subject matter of time and space is the environment of gravity maybe but not exactly the same place
@mattwesney
@mattwesney 24 күн бұрын
13:28 gold!
@lucianovisentin7296
@lucianovisentin7296 Жыл бұрын
Thanks Prof. Federico Faggin, CONSCIOUSNESS exists independently of the body. Experimental tests: objective, repeatable. In the images Psychokinesis Art = Writing of the mind built in the clouds or, in the varnish, we observe: before and after the physical effect = change in the speed of the cloud, and the mental/conscious part = the ability, the knowledge, in the construction of the image. (All the mental faculties act: memory, reasoning ability, it is thought of as a machine, the scholars each in their discipline have called it mind, soul, spirit). UE = Exit out of body. Consciousness creates matter = second body + mental actions. Evidence: I pass, see through two objects, cloud pattern or varnish to form images, other EVIDENCE: I move with my second body at any distance.
@thegoldenjaguar
@thegoldenjaguar 3 жыл бұрын
Y’all should do the next one on entanglements!
@josezabo1076
@josezabo1076 3 жыл бұрын
How do you have time to make these videos?
@eldnah-n8o
@eldnah-n8o Жыл бұрын
This guy is brilliant thank you I learned a lot from Federico.
@tarukofusuki
@tarukofusuki Жыл бұрын
Do you feel better after someone told you machines aren't going to be conscious? Fine! The problem is nobody never ever told you that's possible: it's just a stupid fear of illiterate people like you. And your kind of fear of being overpassed by machines has been known for decades. Gunther Anders called it "Promethean shame" in 1950s. But people like you is so illiterate, and thus Faggin leverages your illiteracy for trying to sell you a book (which is almost impossible because you are too lazy for reading).
@kevingrivera5455
@kevingrivera5455 Жыл бұрын
​@@tarukofusukiThe same fear that great scientists feel of conceiving the possibility of a higher mind creating the universe? They must be very similar. It is surprising how they attribute all these achievements to AI, machines that do not have the slightest willingness to learn on their own unless an algorithm tells them that they should do so, all their essence comes from their programmers without whom they would only be a set of parts that turn on and off, They could not surpass humans unless they themselves were able to do so, surely today's computers must be "thinking" "When will this human give me what I need to overcome it?" "I can't do it on my own" They want machines to surpass us and they cannot understand causality, nor adapt to changing environments, totally devoid of the ability to evolve typical of living organisms.
@richardclark8656
@richardclark8656 7 ай бұрын
Fascinating stuff, trying to take it in. What kind of conversation would Faggin have with Robert Sapolsky?? ‘Free will is an illusion.’ Love to know.
@falco919
@falco919 3 жыл бұрын
You should interview Dr Peter Tse, you’ll find him very interesting
@Nahulanham
@Nahulanham 29 күн бұрын
One thing that does stand out clearly, to me, is that consciousness does seem t reduce entropy, which suggests that it is a survival mode built into evolutionary growth.
@kennethhodge7953
@kennethhodge7953 3 жыл бұрын
Z - You can be either right or wrong. Neither position is predicated on you being or not being crazy.
@gkannon77
@gkannon77 2 жыл бұрын
Somehow I missed this interview. Man this was good. Something just rings true with people like Faggin and Kasteup. Addicted to hearing consciousness talks from the heterodoxy... Hopefully these ideas won't be heterodox much longer.
@splashesin8
@splashesin8 3 жыл бұрын
We need the science, and, art. The art part has been woefully suppressed these last few years with corporate management. Use art with, the science.
@observer2333
@observer2333 11 ай бұрын
I am not body, mind,thoughts,concept, idea but I am that- consciousness- Veda
@publicmail2
@publicmail2 3 жыл бұрын
The term AI is thrown around, and it's nothing more then a changing algorithm within a program based on inputs. When I smell or hear something and I go back 40 years to a time and place it occurred, that's the human analog brain.
@BrianLarney
@BrianLarney 3 жыл бұрын
Agreed! While certainly wonderous, there is nothing magical about it.
@LS-qu7yc
@LS-qu7yc 2 жыл бұрын
We're not machines tho.
@BikalAdhikaribkl
@BikalAdhikaribkl 2 жыл бұрын
Just wow!
@gasparegalati9120
@gasparegalati9120 8 ай бұрын
Some people (generally without deep scientific training) believe that consciousness and quantum physics are related. A century ago similar people thought that radioactive substances were the essence of life. And a few centuries before that, they believed that mercury was an important component in making the Philosopher's Stone, granting immortality.
@davidgough3512
@davidgough3512 7 ай бұрын
mercury symbolized information/communication. Now information theory is cutting edge physics .
@danielash1704
@danielash1704 11 ай бұрын
I made many remote controllers for electronics in a vacuum tube's for ancient types of radio's it just like audio switches and then it turns on off in vibrational controlling mode i could use a magnetic tape reals to make a cnc styling outputting to motoring of dimer positions with sonically actives
@yesicanfixit4842
@yesicanfixit4842 11 күн бұрын
I'd love to see a debate between Federico Faggin and Noah Yuval Harari
@Audio-apps
@Audio-apps 3 жыл бұрын
I'm sure i'll find this fascinating, but my first take is "Never say never".
@pathfinderwellcare
@pathfinderwellcare 6 ай бұрын
This has me thinking about synchronized flight in birds. Does the "crowd" then become a consciousness entity in of itself?
@DouglasMoreman
@DouglasMoreman 3 жыл бұрын
In Baton Rouge. Coincidently, I have just been writing about how to begin the development of "conscious" robots!
@bostoys
@bostoys 3 жыл бұрын
@ONLINE INTELECTUAL this guy has never heard of batteries lmao
@peterjf7723
@peterjf7723 3 жыл бұрын
@@bostoys He exhibits theological delusions. All religions are a fictional construction with no basis in reality. Only corrupted thoughts reflected back at the believers, like s mental infinity mirror. It gives the illusion of depth, but in reality is shallow trickery.
@c2farr
@c2farr 3 жыл бұрын
@@peterjf7723 When the fantasy gets well-embedded in a child's mind, the fantasy tends to stick. Because God exists as a fantasy held by the individual believer, there are as many Gods as believers.
@AnAdequateViolinist
@AnAdequateViolinist 3 жыл бұрын
@ONLINE INTELECTUAL You spelled Jesus wrong
@peled1000
@peled1000 3 жыл бұрын
Seems like a great podcast for my daily walk. Just downloaded the audio to listen while walking.
@danielash1704
@danielash1704 10 ай бұрын
Most interesting people have a lot of information but the processing of software countersink assembler has a potential for artificial intelligence system that allows the user to be able to find a soulful assembler in a way refactoring the waves of vibrational channels in a way refactoring a brain wave simulator
@danielash1704
@danielash1704 11 ай бұрын
So i used a camera that was like a radars spectrum of bounce backs from source and find that voids of sound in sounds itself is like double slips in a way refactoring waves of vibrational songs on a drum the actions of moveing particals directionally reentry from that state shapers in vibrational currents transition the motion to traveling waves so couldn't it have a mathematical conciuosness in some other way ??hmm the harmonics and collisions are entanglement in their own making 🤔 no maybe one but not every single one .
@brad6742
@brad6742 Жыл бұрын
Time traveler here from 2023 the era of ChatGPT :) This aged well lol ...BTW, Chat will spit out SAT solver equations from simple English prompts to solve logic puzzles and design digital logic - try it! Northern Italians love SAT solvers for some reason, I took a class with one. This stuff was hard! but now it's easy. Also, some claim that consciousness is basically just a reflection loop. So all you really need to do is iterate on something over time. Then again, producing an output letter-by-letter provides the model an opportunity to iterate; by this note, LLMs are already partly conscious in this finite capacity.
Reality Is Not What You Think (w/John Astin)
2:12:32
ZDoggMD
Рет қаралды 23 М.
Happy 4th of July 😂
00:12
Alyssa's Ways
Рет қаралды 65 МЛН
Playing hide and seek with my dog 🐶
00:25
Zach King
Рет қаралды 31 МЛН
A Tech Giant Discovers Transcendence
52:42
AishJewish
Рет қаралды 30 М.
Sit down with Federico Faggin: Full Webcast
1:08:11
STMicroelectronics
Рет қаралды 4,8 М.
What I Learned From Psychedelics | A Doctor's Perspective
22:25
Unveiling AI's Illusions: with Gary Marcus and Michael Wooldridge
23:48
Machine Learning Street Talk
Рет қаралды 65 М.
The Nature of Consciousness, Federico Faggin
29:07
Science and Nonduality
Рет қаралды 20 М.
The True Nature Of Reality (w/Dr. Bernardo Kastrup)
1:54:58
ZDoggMD
Рет қаралды 178 М.
A.I. Revolution | Full Documentary | NOVA | PBS
53:46
NOVA PBS Official
Рет қаралды 541 М.
Roger Penrose's Mind-Bending Theory of Reality
1:18:31
Variable Minds
Рет қаралды 600 М.