No way!! THANK YOU! Great feedback :)

@@VicBarry Very welcome! 😃

Thanks bud

Awesome stuff Daniel. Glad this video helped you out 🙏

Awesome! Thank you!

Awesome stuff Tim. Great to hear. Well done you 🔥🔥🔥🔥

Glad you liked it!

Thank you! Cheers!

Cheers Paul. First impressions of the Osmo Pocket 3?

@@VicBarry so far so very had limited opportunity to mess about but the size and feel are extraordinary. It really feels like a different kind of photo / video experience. Setting aside tomorrow to get to grips with the functionality

Thanks Steve

Awesome! Thank you!

Glad you enjoyed!

Thank you 🙏

Thanks Adam. Glad you enjoyed it. Plenty of Osmo pocket stuff and more besides in these parts 🔥🙏

Hey 👋 16 or 32 for the most part but there’s no scene the same 😀

@@VicBarry 😎 👍🏼

On this side of the pond at this time of year? Probably the 8 and 16 mainly.

one more question, how do the ND Fillters work when shooting in Auto? Is that just a no no, because you cannot double the frame rate?@@VicBarry

​@@jostalkingAll an ND filter does is darken the scene so for auto it's kind of like shooting on a cloudy day versus a sunny day, should work fine. If it's already dark then you'll want a less strong ND or none at all, but that applies for shooting in pro mode as well. I think the effect on auto will be that it'll slow down the shutter, creating more realistic footage (motion blur). I just did a test with a mist VND filter (only one I have) set to 32, I'd say it also had less noise

Thanks. Premiere Pro

@@VicBarry Adobe Prime Pro? Thanks!

It needs to be insanely bright for 64. Generally 16 or 32

Haven’t really experienced that over the years to be honest. Granted it could be an imperfection on the glass or a glare or something that’s causing problems

Hey. I’ve no idea to be honest. I’d hazard a guess they might stack given their size but can’t say for sure

@VicBarry thank you very much for responding. I had seen a video where someone used the Skyreat black mist filter with a Startrc ND filter and they repelled each other. I guess hopefully they ones I ordered get here at the same time so can try. Lol

If you need them for what you shoot and know how to use them to get the best results then definitely worth considering. Granted tiny variable NDs will be fiddly to use.

Hey 👋 It’s just on mobile

Ha. Fair enough but as said in the video they’re not for everybody. The camera can’t really do it on auto for the look that’s being described. But look, not for everybody 👍

A grey tone? Where in the video is the grey tone?

​@@VicBarry It's common for ND filters to add a grey tone to footage or pictures. This happens with my camera as well, but I don't mind because I perform color correction on each picture to fix it. In your video at 3:42, you apply the ND filter and subsequently, the colors appear darker and less vibrant. I stopped using ND filters on videos years ago, except for specific scenes with close moving subjects or time-lapses, where I really need a blur effect. However, I don't use it on all footage to maintain a 1/50 shutter speed because I prefer the best look for my footage without post-production color correction. Professional cameras have built-in ND filters that are less noticeable. For instance, Canon's new vlogging camera, the V10, has an internal ND that isn't visible, perhaps because the camera automatically compensates by auto color grading when the filter is on. The DJI Osmo doesn't recognize when the ND filter is on and uses the same settings. It might be better to use it with a log profile and then perform color grading, which I rarely do due to time constraints.

Because that’s what’s perceived as pleasant to human eyes

Hey Jay, technically it’s may be a technical limitation. But it’s the way cameras and exposure have worked for a long long long time.

It’s a real head scratcher. But when you see the same video without motion blur and with motion blur side by side, it’s immediately noticeable. Video recordings different from what we see in real life. In real life, fast-moving objects are a blur. It coincides that traditional filmmaking preserves that blur, as an artifact of filmmaking itself and the limitations you allude to . Film or Video is always a series of still images that our eyes and brain connect seamlessly. However, if the moving objects grabbed within each still picture are themselves crystal clear, we as viewers sense something is off, unnatural, not real. That is, of course, because those moving objects seen by our own eyes never look crystal clear. Director Steven Spielberg deliberately turned this rule on its head in the opening sequences of Saving Private Ryan. Absolutely zero motion blur makes it hyper-immersive, nightmarish.

Yep

I agree

Try watching the footage on a 65" TV and you'll realise it's not. Every single movie known to man will have used filters to create motion blur. You may not notice it most of the time as it's naturally what your eyes see, hence the essential need of ND filters. You ask Star Wars to make their next film without motion blur. You'll soon regret that wish.

i have watched lots of dji pocket 3 footage shot with ND filter on youtube and it looks like the overall video quality somewat lost ... even small moments are causing low quality like videos.

You are incorrect.