Why Nothing Can Stop Eurofighter Typhoon with Mixed Missiles

Рет қаралды 739,846

2 жыл бұрын

Eurofighter Typhoon is the world’s leading air defence and ground attack aircraft with full multi and swing-role capabilities.
The aircraft's development effectively began in 1983 with the Future European Fighter Aircraft programme, a multinational collaboration among the UK, Germany, France, Italy and Spain.
The next part, we are going to show you its weapons. The Eurofighter Typhoon has 13 hardpoints for weapon carriage, four under each wing and five under the fuselage. An armament control system manages weapons selection and firing and monitors weapon status.
Depending on role, the fighter can carry the following mix of missiles:
•Air-superiority: six BVRAAM or AMRAAM air-to-air missiles on semi-recessed fuselage stations and two ASRAAM short-range air-to-air missiles on the outer pylons.
•Air interdiction: four AMRAAM, two ASRAAM, two cruise missiles and two anti-radar missiles.
•SEAD (suppression of enemy air defenses) with four AMRAAM, two ASRAAM, and six anti-radar missiles.
•Multirole: three AMRAAM, two ASRAAM, two ARM and two GBU-24 Paveway III/IV
•Close air support: with four AMRAAM, two ASRAAM, and 18 Brimstone anti-armor missiles
•The last one, Maritime attack with four AMRAAM, two ASRAAM, and six anti-ship missiles.
And the last part that we want to show you is about the engine.
The Eurofighter is equipped with two Eurojet EJ200 engines that have been developed by Eurojet, in Munich, each delivering thrust of 90kN in full reheat and 60kN in dry power mode. Single-stage turbines drive the three-stage fan and five-stage HP compressor. This allows Eurofighter Typhoon to cruise at supersonic speeds without the use of reheat for extended periods. The engines deliver 1,000 flying hours without needing unscheduled maintenance through the use of advanced integrated Health Monitoring for class-leading reliability, maintainability and Through Life Cost.
The Typhoon is capable of supersonic cruise without using afterburners (referred to as supercruise). Air Forces Monthly gives a maximum supercruise speed of Mach 1.1 for the RAF FGR4 multirole version, however in a Singaporean evaluation, a Typhoon managed to supercruise at Mach 1.21 on a hot day with a combat load. But Eurofighter states that the Typhoon can supercruise at Mach 1.5.
All content on Military TV is presented for educational purposes.
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv
/ militarytv.channel
defense-tv.com/

Пікірлер: 1 000

@LiveDonkeyDeadLion 2 жыл бұрын

My favourite story about the typhoon is from back in 2005 when two F-15’s saw one flying over the Lake District and decided to give the pilot a fright. The RAF pilot managed to shake off the attempted radar lock and managed to get a radar lock on both of them. Oh, that particular typhoon was just a trainer and it was hushed up for a while to avoid any blushes. Not for the RAF of course, that pilot had nothing to be ashamed of

@CidFafner 2 жыл бұрын

Just got my copy of Mike Sutton's book 'Typhoon' about the RAF Syrian campaign. About to have some reading tonight.

@innerlight7018 2 жыл бұрын

Not mentioned in the video, the EF Typhoon can also carry Meteor and IRIS-T, which makes him a deadly air superiority fighter!

@strasbourgerelsass1467 Жыл бұрын

True. The Typhoon is still far out of the enemy ranges and fired already Meteor. 😁

@dennisleighton2812 8 ай бұрын

@@JimCarner Agreed, Jim. Currently, the Typhoon is probably the most underrated fighter in service. Not a bad thing though. Just think of the surprise any adversary will get should they be foolish enough to take it on! However, the French Rafale is so slouch either, while the Swedish Gripen is a real force to be reckoned with. Together, and deployed as an integrated force, they could dominate the European air space. This is further enhanced by the advent of ever-increasing numbers of F-35s in the area, and the very real probability that they will soon have access to Meteor! Very soon, the new F-15EX "bomb trucks" will be entering service with an order for 100 or more in the offing. Just to spice things up a bit, there is the B21 coming on stream in the next few years, which is set to be a MAJOR surprise for "them"! Another aspect is the quick-response capability of the Typhoon. Pilots do many alerts and get in the air within minutes, and thus get valuable practice in this respect. Not many other Air Forces have this ability currently.

@dennisleighton2812 8 ай бұрын

@@JimCarner Thanks a ton for all that extra data Jim. Yeah, as I said highly under-rated.

@scuderio762 2 жыл бұрын

Saw two of them flying over my barracks in Germany today, always awesome to see these beasts

@Military-TV 2 жыл бұрын

Very cool!

@scratchy996 2 жыл бұрын

Heard them two nights ago here in Romania.

@julius2643 2 жыл бұрын

i have seen 3 fogs over my school in my life where 2 were probably tornadoes and i was born in germany

@RSProduxx 2 жыл бұрын

@@scratchy996 They´ll stay there for a while as it seems ... Greetings from Germany.

@craig8983 2 жыл бұрын

2 eurofighters flying in Germany? Must be a lie.. :D

@saintuk70 Жыл бұрын

Have watched these for years flying over Scotland - they are lovely aircraft, very loud on performance take-off, and go up like the old Lightning.

@1guitarlover 2 жыл бұрын

The Typhoon has an infrared detector on the left side to the cockpit. Thus, the F22 stealthiness is compromised as soon as they open fire. Since the missile's thermal signature will be revealed and the position of the F22 determined. The Typhoon is a heck of a plane.

@Its_Katyusha232 2 жыл бұрын

No that’s the Russian su27 that has the inferred detecter that’s what that bulge is on the cockpit on the left not the typhoon

@pyromaniacalcarrot2472 Жыл бұрын

@@Its_Katyusha232 You can literally see the infared detector on the Typhoon.

@ElmarLecher Жыл бұрын

@@Its_Katyusha232 While the SU27 has that the Eurofighter typhoon has that too - in a lot more advanced way than the SU27

@jimramsey8887 Жыл бұрын

@@Its_Katyusha232 It is only the German Typhoons that do not have that IRST

@zygbeee8563 10 ай бұрын

Irst is actually used to detect the planes fuselage, so it doesn’t require an enemy to fire a missle.

@gt7984 Жыл бұрын

Not only is it among the best fighters in the world, but also imo the best looking one. Gotta love delta wings+canards

@greenmoose_ 2 жыл бұрын

where I live in the UK these things are fairly "common" to see in the skies - I didn't realise they were such a capable machine!

@nickhechtel3133 2 жыл бұрын

Typhoon can also use the Taurus Cruise missile with around 500km range which makes it a really dangerous Long range platform

@ENGBriseB 2 жыл бұрын

It entered operational force in 2003 and since has been upgraded. It definitely holds its own.

@breakink9396 2 жыл бұрын

Not stealth but if you go toe to toe with a typhoon, you're gonna get wiped

@scottmeehan2422 2 жыл бұрын

@@breakink9396 especially if its got a few metors on board.

@wurzelbert84wucher5 2 жыл бұрын

@@breakink9396 I read so many reports, that the stealth isn't working properly all the time, so maybe it's overrated to begin with.

@dandane5227 2 жыл бұрын

@@wurzelbert84wucher5 its working but radars is getting more advance. Ultimately its radar tech vs stealth tech.

@virginccyy7645 Жыл бұрын

@@wurzelbert84wucher5 where do you read that? US spends $30 to $40 per flight hour because they make sure Ram and everything else is working!

@jasonswearingin1009 2 жыл бұрын

Looking at this plane makes me think of what would happen if you took the best qualities of the F-16 and F-15 and packed them into a very beautiful and lethal looking aircraft. She does look like a very maneuverable and responsive aircraft.

@darylkemp1257 2 жыл бұрын

Looking at this beautiful plane and the F22 Raptor we know why putins scared of the prospect of a no fly zone in Ukraine and is hiding behind the threats of his weapons of mass destruction his airforces scrap can't match these baby's in dogfighting combat 🇬🇧🤝🇺🇸 💪💪💪💪

@jasonswearingin1009 2 жыл бұрын

@@darylkemp1257 It's crazy how advanced the F-22 is. Hell in training exercises against our own F-15C (Air Superiority Version). All 6 F-15s piloted reported they got simulated lethal missile strikes against them and their sensors never saw the Raptor.

@darylkemp1257 2 жыл бұрын

@@jasonswearingin1009 RAF typhoon GR4 US airforce f22 , F18 , F35 , will send his airforce to the scrap heap he's petrified as he can't fight us conventionally he threatens the 🌎 with nuclear holocaust

@MusMasi 2 жыл бұрын

@@darylkemp1257 and his massive army is struggling against militia in Ukraine, if there where no nukes, Nato could link up with the ukrainians and march all the way to moscow and dig the grub out and give him the Benito treatment, hand him over to the Ukrainian irregulars to have some fun with and film it for the rest of us.

@christopherchristianvanlan1809 2 жыл бұрын

@@darylkemp1257 yes...send some Gripen E's and Rafale and it get even more intense

@ifv2089 2 жыл бұрын

_Legend has is there is a viewer out there that knows more than the designer's the pilots and the ground crew if you get lucky you might be blessed with an_ "well actually"

@antonyaiken 2 жыл бұрын

As a senior avionics supervisor for BAESYSTEMS on typhoon....... no, actually, this video is pretty spot on. 👌

@ifv2089 2 жыл бұрын

👆 _Ahahaaaha a legend has spoken_ 😂 Next

@ashscott6068 2 жыл бұрын

As antony aiken's boss at Mcdonald's I can say: Don't listen to a word he says. Also: If he misses one more Monday shift, he can start looking for alternative employment.

@ifv2089 2 жыл бұрын

Sorta sad seriously get a grip and some opsec n even more cringe using another account give *yourself* a shout out 😂😂🤣

@innerlight7018 2 жыл бұрын

Das Teil ist unglaublich. Kombinierte Waffenwirkung mit maximaler Geschwindigkeit in das Zielgebiet zu bringen ist eine echte Leistung.

@ag2938 2 жыл бұрын

Aber von allem nur ein Kompromiss, denn das Eier legende Woll-Milch-Schwein gibt es nicht!

@Moto.rola. 2 жыл бұрын

Wenn das Ding auch zuverlässig wäre. Zumindest in Deutschland sind die Dinger öfter in der Werkstatt als in der Luft. Und ja, das Ding kann viel, aber nichts davon richtig....

@f.r.5106 2 жыл бұрын

@@Moto.rola. Endlich mal ein Pilot der hier kommentiert *ironie aus*

@Moto.rola. 2 жыл бұрын

@@f.r.5106 nicht Pilot.. Ehemaliger Lfz Mechaniker / Soldat heute Maschinenbau Ing. Der tapex Fighter ist so wie ihn die BW einsetzen will, einfach nicht tauglich. So wie man aus dem Star-Fighter einen Bomber machen wollte.

@innerlight7018 2 жыл бұрын

@@ag2938 Die De Havilland Mosquito war auch "nur" ein Kompromiss. Allerdings ein extrem erfolgreicher.

@bradbole6853 2 жыл бұрын

this was the aircraft that got me addicted to areospace!

@peterchessell28 2 жыл бұрын

Was it really? i,m so glad.

@cheese2764 2 жыл бұрын

Mine was su 27. Now I’m an aeronautical engineer :)

@gt7984 Жыл бұрын

Same here, always loved the Eurofighter and Su27. Now studying aerospace engineering partially thanks to these awesome planes :)

@timusher8312 Жыл бұрын

Nothing can beat a typhoon euro fighter jet

@blaspopopo 2 жыл бұрын

now with the meteor it has a very long reach up to 150 km or further ,with match 4 during the mid course,there is a non scape area with it, and even the oldest ones retrofited can mount aim 120 c7 and litening 3 pod so,great aircraft so expensive too but great.

@strasbourgerelsass1467 Жыл бұрын

Meteor goes much loooonger...

@iconofsin5886 Жыл бұрын

The Typhoon is a very nice jet indeed. If you get a few squadrons of Typhoons and F35s together that would make for a very deadly combination for any opposing force.

@fra93ilgrande Жыл бұрын

In Italy we have both 😈🔝 👊🏻 🇮🇹

@Darknamja 2 жыл бұрын

A true multi-role weapons platform. Very impressive. 😉

@johnbradley4828 2 жыл бұрын

My God this thing is literally armed to the teeth. What a wonderful machine.

@MsIdiAmin 2 жыл бұрын

the ammunition is or or like every other jet.

@SpartasEdge 2 жыл бұрын

@@MsIdiAmin Not every other, and that doesn't negate what he said.

@paulrossiter9567 2 жыл бұрын

I worked within an aerospace company and we were machining a lot of parts for euro fighter and air bus early 2000 …spectacular beasts of war ⭐️ ⭐️⭐️

@666wurm 2 жыл бұрын

I once worked on some cast aluminum parts of the Eurofighter as a student in Munich. Good times. BTW: "EADS" is not pronounced as a word. It is an abreviation.

@MyScotty7 2 жыл бұрын

Stayed right next door to RAF coinsby,unbelievable planes,the noise but especially the movements gave you goosebumps.Some plane to see live!

@beamzontoast 2 жыл бұрын

Saw a few of these flying over my school doing some low training exercises, it was crazy

@POPPA-KLUMP 2 жыл бұрын

I’ve seen these a few times and watching them performance take off is always amazing, and good lord are they loud!

@1guitarlover 2 жыл бұрын

One of the best videos about this plane ever made. Thank you.

@stewartgarner-jones9226 2 жыл бұрын

I live not far from one of the RAFs front line typhoon stations so see and hear these almost daily

@maffin1012 2 жыл бұрын

Same, 5km away from the runway and I don't like it. Once a year they have for 4 weeks new pilot training, it's horrible 😅

@JavierCR25 2 жыл бұрын

And!!! And!!! It’s the best looking plane out there…

@skyecommander2169 2 жыл бұрын

Debatable. But the 2 seat typhoon is an absolute abomination that should have never left the drawing board.🙅‍♂️

@tomsnow5610 2 жыл бұрын

@@skyecommander2169 I swear the only jet converted to a 2 seater that looks good is the hawk jet lmfao

@VicariousAdventurer 2 жыл бұрын

Rafale

@tomsnow5610 2 жыл бұрын

@@VicariousAdventurer admittedly as a two seater it doesn’t look different from the normal Rafale but in general I find it quite ugly anyway

@jasonmote9529 2 жыл бұрын

@@tomsnow5610 the two seat jaguar is very pretty

@MsAlisonWunderland 2 жыл бұрын

I designed some of the tools used for manufacturing the blades for the EJ-200 turbines.

@ianmuir6784 2 жыл бұрын

We need more of them

@tonygeddes9558 2 жыл бұрын

Eurofighter was always deadly at short range. METEOR makes it frankly frightening at long range. People talk about the F-22 Raptor. Fantastic aircraft but I’m very sceptical about its supposed stealth capabilities. Eurofighter Typhoon plus METEOR makes it frankly deadly. No pilot would ever want to go up against a Eurofighter equipped with METEOR.

@scottwhitley3392 2 жыл бұрын

To modern radar the F-22 isn’t stealthy.

@Sachrial1 2 жыл бұрын

In red flag trainings, the typhon was taken out by F35As. The F22 is probably a even deadlier air superiority fighter. Also 'invisibility' is not the only goal of stealth. Its main goal against systems like the S300 or S400 is to make it harder to track a jet and shoot it down. All in all, looking at data available to the public, the eurofighter is a good jet, but not able to fight and win against an F22. You are free to believe what you want of course, but once again: Available data does not support your believes.

@NATObait 2 жыл бұрын

The RAF has the luxury of training it's pilots with both F35 and Typhoon units going head to head. Now lots of fans and fantasists can say what they like but the RAF know.

@GSF404 2 жыл бұрын

In a dogfight the Typhoon should edge the F-22 for a few design reasons BUT the F-22 aims to not find itself in that situation. A Rafale once managed to 'kill' a Raptor in a dogfight. But that aside, if the Raptor pilot is in that situation, death is the deserved reward.

@NATObait 2 жыл бұрын

@@GSF404 German pilots laughed and said they had Raptor Salad. But that misses the point of real tactics in a war scenario. F22 would be at arms length and pick off targets it is an assassin not a phone box knife fighter, it's just to risky.

@kirstyanderson1641 2 жыл бұрын

Finally a video that doesn’t praise the us for having the best jets

@clipsncasts1 2 жыл бұрын

But the US does.

@johnmcdonald744 Жыл бұрын

Make that comment to that balloon

@THE-BUNKEN-DRUM Жыл бұрын

@@clipsncasts1: Not all US jets are the best.

@armyquite4348 2 жыл бұрын

Jet tempur ini sangat cantik👍

@lionljb 2 жыл бұрын

Nato: okay we have the Typhoon. Now everybody do whatever you want with it, you could perhaps add some cammo. for example Germany, your Tarnfleck is pretty nice, how about making one for your planes? German Pilots: lmao lightning go brrrrrr 3:51

@abraham2172 2 жыл бұрын

Great video, awesome fighter. I feel it is oftentimes underestimated by Americans and many others.

@ianmuir6784 2 жыл бұрын

But that’s typical for America

@GonzoTehGreat 2 жыл бұрын

Better to be underestimated than the opposite! _"I don't fight in tournaments because when I fight a man for real, I don't want him to know what I can do."_ ----- Ned Stark

@schwanzuslongus4638 2 жыл бұрын

I mean the Americans always think their weapons are the best. They also say their Abrams tank is the best , although the leopard 2 is much better

@doubletapthatdotty4597 2 жыл бұрын

@@schwanzuslongus4638 the challenger 2 is also better, after all it's built by the same people who build and design the leopard, they just built the challenger to British specs. The French leclerc is better as well.

@alerambo98 2 жыл бұрын

@@GonzoTehGreat i thought the same thing!

@SpartasEdge 2 жыл бұрын

What an awesome plane.

@seang3019 2 жыл бұрын

I watched a flyover of one of these up the Thames at an airshow once, flying about a hundred metres off the water at full speed. I swear you would shit yourself if you saw that coming at you.

@kresimirmilisa5560 2 жыл бұрын

this is are european combat power and excellent combat machine produced from airbus nice video .

@bordmike 2 жыл бұрын

Part off the ongoing upgrades include a AESA radar

@gordonlawrence1448 2 жыл бұрын

The Radar is chuffing awesome. The reason it is a steerable planar array is that at lower frequencies you cant phase steer so easily. The PLL and Programmable PLL work all the way down to 200MHz and all the way up to the K band (above Ku). This ability renders all stealth modes of anything out there useless. I think it can actually really work from the bottom of S band (2GHz) to the top of Ku (18GHz) with the limitation being the bandwidth of the amps.

@NATObait 2 жыл бұрын

Kuwait is the opening AESA buyer for CAPTOR E Radar. But Germany and Spain are building a new upgraded version . But UK are also building a version . So that makes 3 AESA versions .

@bremnersghost948 2 жыл бұрын

Love the sound of the Typhoons Engines.

@epiphone5696 2 жыл бұрын

They sound amazing

@TopSecretVid 2 жыл бұрын

Love the Typhoon

@antonyaiken 2 жыл бұрын

Most accurate and factual typhoon video I've seen on KZfaq. Well researched.

@bannyfaith4420 2 жыл бұрын

Good technology has good achievement

@frankmueller6522 2 жыл бұрын

Go forward, America and Europe! Long live the Nato! Long live freedom! Down with all dictatorships and terrorists all around the world! Best wishes from Germany!

@arsenijearsen3041 2 жыл бұрын

Long live freedom without war organization like NATO etc...

@guitarentries8180 2 жыл бұрын

Unfortunately Nato is not fighting any dictatorship in the world, but rather stand beside terror. If you understand what i mean

@tkskagen 2 жыл бұрын

Looks like a F-16, SAAB (DELTA Wing Variant), and a F-18 had a baby... Still, a Very Beautiful Fighter/Bomber!

@horyzengaming3935 2 жыл бұрын

My 10 year old son thinks all fighter planes look the same too, not till you get older you realize they look different and flight function is totally different, so are totally different beasts.

@jamesknowles6472 2 жыл бұрын

Oh yes

@moonasha 2 жыл бұрын

to me it seems the closest analogue is an F-15, though both airplanes were built for different purposes. But they end up having similar engines, hardpoints, ranges

@pipoudong2633 2 жыл бұрын

ءان شاء الله تقوم الجزائر بشرائها ءاحب اليوروفايتر كثيرا

@ClemensAlive 2 жыл бұрын

German Weapons: "World's leading X" Americans: "We want none of it."

@raidzles727 2 жыл бұрын

I just proud that my country picked this jet

@tigerbesteverything 2 жыл бұрын

should have picked rafale, it's just better in every way by a large margin, except interception, but its the only exception.

@raidzles727 2 жыл бұрын

@@tigerbesteverything ngl I kinda like the typhoon more, it’s just sexy.

@epiphone5696 2 жыл бұрын

@@tigerbesteverything Not in every way, typhoon is better at rate fighting

@tigerbesteverything 2 жыл бұрын

@@epiphone5696 rafale is better, it can completly blind opponent sensors, it did it on a egyptian su27/37. Typhoon is left behind on electronic warfare.

@epiphone5696 2 жыл бұрын

@@tigerbesteverything yes but claiming its better in every way is simply not true

@stevecook706 2 жыл бұрын

I often go past RAF Coningsby , Lincolnshire and watch the "Phoons". The little road near to Tattershall Bridge is perfect to stop and take a break and watch them come low over your head! I always take my camera when I go over there.

@ruzziasht349 2 жыл бұрын

Coningsby

@fredtedstedman 2 жыл бұрын

Love Typhoon 😍😍 Wales UK.

@dogstar5572 2 жыл бұрын

A policeman with a speed gun aimed it at one of these things. The tornado went full auto attack mode. No one was hurt but the pilot had to manually turn its aggressive mode off. Doubtful it was armed but the look on the policeman’s face must have been priceless. ‘Don’t point lasers at any aircraft’.

@GodKing804 2 жыл бұрын

That's a old fake news from 2004

@WardenOfTerra 2 жыл бұрын

No. 100% wrong.

@dogstar5572 2 жыл бұрын

@@WardenOfTerra So you like pointing lasers at aircraft?

@anethers7545 2 жыл бұрын

It’s a typhoon not a tornado, but that story was going around in the 80’s too, as well as a story that people would get off speeding fines near RAF Kinloss because the Nimrods affected the speed gun

@richardfld 2 жыл бұрын

That never happened and you know it

@almmax9194 2 жыл бұрын

Il est tellement meilleur que les pays qui l'ont conçu sont obligés d'acheter americain pour leur défense à l'exception de la france😀

@scorpion-120 2 жыл бұрын

these countries are buying fifth generation fighters and the typhoon is an excellent fighter.

@pedromartinojeda 2 жыл бұрын

Qui est entrain de remplacer les Typhoons par des avions americain? Si tu parles des f35 B c'est bien ça, la version B Spécial pour le transport maritime (porte-avions). Du coup, tous les pays membres du programme Eurofighter son entrain de moderniser les systèmes de ces avions (tranche 4).

@almmax9194 2 жыл бұрын

Aux dernières nouvelles la plupart de ces pays n'ont pas de porte avions

@rohanhewitt4818 2 жыл бұрын

My grandparents livelike 5 minutes from one of their main bases in the UK. RAF Coningsby

@user-bs4qq9yl5p 9 ай бұрын

Living in Coningsby, I see phoons regularly, even better, seeing the display pilot practising

@timepiece_enthusiast 2 жыл бұрын

5:45 The Typhoons most dangerous weapon...the Ass Ram missile...

@3s0t3r1c 2 жыл бұрын

They will ram it in the enemies ass.

@Iroh_158 2 жыл бұрын

why did i laugh so hard at this? can't they come up with a better name? haha

@burritotrap 2 жыл бұрын

@@Iroh_158 no, cause homophobic russians will be afraid of Ass Ram and just run away

@THE-BUNKEN-DRUM Жыл бұрын

I bet you know all about that. 😉

@model101t800 2 жыл бұрын

@ 03.50 and it can fly backwards, wow

@leeneon854 2 жыл бұрын

Great multi purpose fighter all round

@ReleaseYourHandbrake 2 жыл бұрын

If you change the exhaust to look like its a single air intake, it would look like F-16C?

@Hickeroar 2 жыл бұрын

I knew practically nothing about this plane before watching this. Really cool. I had no idea this thing was this legit...

@datutturugang666 2 жыл бұрын

dude it’s insane, i used to live in italy, about 5 km from the world famous frecce tricolori rivolto air base, eurofighters were there quite often, it was a delightful experience as a kid sticking my nose up in the air and admire in awe

@egilkarlson7253 2 жыл бұрын

For the weaponery you forgot the european air to air missiles. Germany use Meteor and IRIS-T.

@SuperGreenough 2 жыл бұрын

I don’t think he really was specific about missiles, just their type. ASRAAM and BVRAAM are types of missiles, rather than models, the METEOR is BVRAAM the Iris-T is SRAAM

@Psi-Storm 2 жыл бұрын

ASRAAM means Advanced Short Range Air to Air Missile, and BVRAAM is Beyond Visual Range AAM. He just didn't mention the specific weapon systems.

@ioanbota9397 2 жыл бұрын

I like this fighter jet

@MeTube3 2 жыл бұрын

Developed and evolved from the EAP which first flew in 1986.

@petermallia558 2 жыл бұрын

The Best and most advanced swing-role multimission Air superiority fighter interceptor, ground attack, Close Air Support, interdiction, deep strike, maritime attack anti-ship aircraft in the World. Divided by a common language. ...or even Aluminium casting..... rather than aluminum, it's the I you see and so as it's a British design, it has to be Aluminium. 😂🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧👍🏻 Once again, another very good we'll scripted and narrated video.

@themc.kennyshow6585 2 жыл бұрын

Good day to you too bro. As a fellow Britishman I do concur. I really wonder why the Americans spell 'aluminium' like that.

@frankcrawford416 2 жыл бұрын

This jet is only 4 -4.5 gen. It cannot survive in a high threat environment. It is equivalent to an F-15. No better. Why do we have so much revisionist history going on today. The American F35 may not be as pretty, but America makes things that just plain out will kill. The f35 is not pretty, but it can do so much. How can typhoon be most advanced compared to stealthy f35 with its helmet that can see through its own body, with its also radar which is most advanced, with its American missiles which have got to be the best, with its ability to share targeting info with ships, bombers, other less high tech 4th gen and fifth gen aircraft. How are they saying the euro is more high tech than an f35, I dont get it? In what area, weapons? Stealth? Radar? Sharing data?, Computer? Radar jamming? Can it see through its own body? Can not the f35 also attack ground targets like the typhoon. You know the f35 single engine is equal in power to both euro typhoon engines. The f35 in 2023 is getting a new one of 50,000 lb thrust and 15 percent greater range on same fuel. Already now the f35 has greater range than any other fighter known on internal fuel. We really don't know about the j20, but the j20 is junk. We know that the stealth of the f35 made it junk. It can't compete. It would probably just be okay against a 4th gen, but we also know it can't even maneuver as well as an f15. The su57 has even worse stealth which also makes it junk, but certainly maneuvers better than the j20. The f35 has a greater thrust to weight ratio than all other Jets except an f22 or perhaps an f15.

@Morris2182 2 жыл бұрын

@@frankcrawford416 watch the video, he clearly states it’s the best multi role. It can do things the F22 and the F35 cannot. I also heard about 10 years ago that F22 was defeated in air to air combat by Typhoon flown by several RAF pilots but like the Vulcan breaching your air defences and nuking a few cities the US government will cover it up for years. Before you start ranting it would be wise to check out how much BaE systems has to do with F22 and F35 and who was the primary contractor of Typhoon. I’m not saying F22 or F35 aren’t as good as Typhoon, they clearly are better in certain scenarios but the rest of the world is getting a bit bored of people saying F22 or the F35 is the best, as they have different roles to play. A good example of this is the F15EX being developed and F22 being cancelled, ask yourself why without saying it’s too expensive (F35 costs more).

@lenkautsugi5747 2 жыл бұрын

@@Morris2182 I think ur talking about red flag where typhoon went up f22 in a mock battle and f22 loss

@frankcrawford416 2 жыл бұрын

@@Morris2182 F35 does not cost more. For foreign sales eurofighter with pods so that it can do what the f35 can do costs 140 million. The f35 is 77.9 million

@sergevandyck 2 жыл бұрын

Tu parles ! dans pratiquement tous les exercices les rafales les ont surpassé.

@TabRipley 2 жыл бұрын

It’s beautiful

@funnydog8886 2 жыл бұрын

It’s also awesome at airshows.

@JasMusicDE 2 жыл бұрын

This thing will go in 90° vertical and will even accelerate

@1nv1nc3ble 2 жыл бұрын

Thats what she said

@theblower069 2 жыл бұрын

A stunning video a comment not mentioned is that the aircraft is designed to be unstable to allow manouverability, if one computer system were to fail there is a redundancy but it would be better to land asap. But i would not want to be on the recieving end of this formidable aircraft. In closing there isn`t much that can beat this and that wont be by much if it was.

@bobabier5394 2 жыл бұрын

one of the last true warplanes you could say. they tried to make it perfect for all roles and in my opinion they did not fail. the only flaw is it's price.

@esecallum 2 жыл бұрын

maneuverability is useless against AA missiles

@the_retag 2 жыл бұрын

Ots stabilisation ist quadruple. Under normal circumstances they immediately land if one fails, but in combat it would still be safe if two are lost

@johnnybravo8281 Жыл бұрын

@@esecallum jep it was designed in an era where it mattered.. but against radar missiles it has the pirate system which produces many Radar Echos to confuse the rockets and prevent target locking...

@THE-BUNKEN-DRUM Жыл бұрын

@esecallum : That's total bullshit. So you're saying aircraft missiles are countered by a mixture of maneuvering & countermeasures.

@TheDude50447 2 жыл бұрын

iirc the Eurofighter has a different loadout for Air to Air missions at least in germany with the IRIS T short range and the Meteor mid to long range missile. Dont know about ground attack configurations.

@secretagent86 2 жыл бұрын

I like twin engines. Crazy to use just one canada should buy this or swedish

@bobdylan7120 2 жыл бұрын

The design actually started with the Private Venture British Aerospace EAP (Experimental Aircraft Programme) before the rest of Europe woke up and joined in.

@Ruffstantin 2 жыл бұрын

There were actually more programs than the EAP. For example the "Jäger 90 Programm" of Germany.

@bobdylan7120 2 жыл бұрын

@@Ruffstantin In the beginning there was EAP. As they began to wake up, and join in, each country gave their participation a local name. For Germany that was Jager 90.

@charlesgulle8079 2 жыл бұрын

What's the difference between multi role and swing role fighter jet?

@chrisjones2149 2 жыл бұрын

Multi-role: Aircraft can accomplish multiple air/ground missions on the same flight without need to reconfigure the aircraft. Swing-role: aircraft can be reconfigured to accomplish air/ground missions but needs to be changed on the ground before each flight type.

@charlesgulle8079 2 жыл бұрын

@@chrisjones2149 Thanks for the valuable information 🙏

@carwyngriffiths 2 жыл бұрын

@@chrisjones2149 that is incorrect and the other way around. Swing role is where you’re able to switch between roles within the same sortie where as multi role requires you to rearm and re configure the aircraft for that specific role.

@SpriGgEx 2 жыл бұрын

@@carwyngriffiths yeah i thought so as well xD

@THE-BUNKEN-DRUM Жыл бұрын

@@charlesgulle8079: Don't thank him. He's wrong.

@zdarky_6623 Жыл бұрын

Meteors and IrisT: *allow us to introduce ourselves*

@HeliStephan 2 жыл бұрын

What do you think about the radar signature with fully fitted external weapon mounting points?

@ManuelBarner 2 жыл бұрын

if you see the signature of a EF with full load - you start to pray. Guess that's all you can do.

@karazor-el9596 2 жыл бұрын

The pilot doesn't care he's literally flying god in a mixed missile typhoon

@HeliStephan 2 жыл бұрын

@@karazor-el9596 God is dead. :)

@karazor-el9596 2 жыл бұрын

@@HeliStephansorry kid god is immortal try again

@johnmcdonald744 Жыл бұрын

“Laughs in raptor”😅

@jerichocarrera50 2 жыл бұрын

Give some to the Philippines

@brusselssprouts560 2 жыл бұрын

I believe the Russian Airforce pilots dread this aircraft, and the ordnance it can carry. As soon as possible Ukraine should be loaned/given these and obviously trained up.

@frankcrawford416 2 жыл бұрын

We should. We should fly them too, like they did to us in Korea and vietnam

@StruggleGaming 2 жыл бұрын

7:32 aww it looked at me... why do I taste metal?

@badrobot2765 2 жыл бұрын

Best in the world in my humble opinion.

@Jonas-uh7bb 2 жыл бұрын

Was the meteor missile missed? 🧐

@warhead_beast7661 2 жыл бұрын

also the Stormshadow was missed

@thiesdwersteg982 2 жыл бұрын

@@warhead_beast7661 and the better stormshadow kepd 350 (Taurus stealth cruise missle).

@warhead_beast7661 2 жыл бұрын

@@thiesdwersteg982 although Taurus isn't integrated into the Eurofighter system... The Luftwafde did one Test Fire with it but hasn't fully integrated it yet

@ser43_OLDC 2 жыл бұрын

@@warhead_beast7661 it's in process of integration in Spain airforce typhoon's

@warhead_beast7661 2 жыл бұрын

@@ser43_OLDC yes I know that's why I added a "yet"

@nsatoday 2 жыл бұрын

A great 4+ fighter but in BVR the F-22 has still got it beat. He who fires accurate fire first wins.

@martin1377 2 жыл бұрын

The Typhoon carries the Meteor with a max range of 200KM, the F22 has the Aim -120D has a range of 160KM. The Typhoon also has PIRATE, that is something the F-22 can not hide from. So It would be an interesting fight at BVR. But if the F-22 gets into a merge then it has not done it's job right.

@GonzoTehGreat 2 жыл бұрын

There aren't enough F-22s operational to make a difference in a war and they're already scheduled for retirement in the 2030s because they're too expensive to maintain and upgrade. The EF will probably remain in service longer as the primary air defence/superiority fighter for Germany, UK, Italy and Spain, which makes it more relevant in the future.

@simul8guy75 2 жыл бұрын

@@EmperorLionflame Total BS....

@nsatoday 2 жыл бұрын

@@GonzoTehGreat, so when America launches its F-22 replacement in 2030, which will obviously supply the Raptors capabilities… that makes typhoon even less relevant.

@GonzoTehGreat 2 жыл бұрын

@@nsatoday As yet there's no confirmed date for when NGAD will replace the Raptor, but 2030 is a reasonable guess. As for the Typhoon, the USA doesn't fly it and is unlikely to ever fight it, so what they do next is irrelevant. Regardless, the Typhoon will likely remain in service and highly relevant to the countries which use it, until it's eventually replaced by either Tempest, FCAS or some combination of both.

@hofnaerrchen 2 жыл бұрын

Hmmm... how the Luftwaffe planes are painted remind me of trains with advertising on them. Looks like they had to sell the surface to keep the planes operational.^^

@johngreene7130 2 жыл бұрын

Saw one today!

@jenshendriks9092 2 жыл бұрын

isn't the F-22 Raptor the most technically advanced fighter jet in operation?

@orbytl2799 2 жыл бұрын

most techically advanced maybe, best all round plane is debatable, but im no expert

@jenshendriks9092 2 жыл бұрын

@@orbytl2799 Yeah but the terminology used in the video is “most technically advanced”. Not most practical

@folkereicht5746 2 жыл бұрын

He always ends with "swing role fighter". I guess f22 would be air superiority, not swing role

@JCJW101 2 жыл бұрын

This video seems very old as well even though it was only recently uploaded.

@robiiify 2 жыл бұрын

@@jenshendriks9092 the eurofighter has seen many upgrades in the last few years that could land it this name. It has the longest ranged missles(200km range for the meteor and 160km for the next best air to air missle of the US) and a new radar that gives it a 200° wide arc infront of the plane)

@myname2938 2 жыл бұрын

In real combat the jet will never fly like that with all these weapons in a beast mod. There is a reason jet drop their fuel tanks sometimes

@fslolo6622 2 жыл бұрын

That drop the tanks before combat so they can fly like that

@gerardv.scheindelen8285 2 жыл бұрын

What do you guys think? Are we overrating f22 f35? Due to their designated role. Like f35 is more dependable on external systems and weapons.... Is this one more versatile? And therfore more deployable?

@shadeix4595 2 жыл бұрын

F35 is no fighter anytime, it`s stealth plane for pointbombing or fight against old planes like F4 without AWACS or ground radar. But F22 not so much worse than Su-30. And F15 too

@frankcrawford416 2 жыл бұрын

No actually. We under rate them. The f35 and f22 are held back at airshows because it would be stupid to show everything. Their true stealth is also not known. The f35 actually has the lower rcs of the two. They want the rumor that the 22 is stealthier than the 35 to persist, although some generals are now saying the 35 is the stealthiest, without exact figures of course, that the 22 rcs is like a marble, and 35 is down to pea gravel size, which is much smaller. Both of these Jets, particularly the 22 would wipe the floor with other Jets whether they had stealth or not. But stealth, and true stealth, not the phoney stealth of su57, j20, or electronic stealth only of euro typhoon, grippen, makes the 35 and 22 so deadly. The 35 also has the most powerful electronic jamming too of all Jets made by man to date and enjoyed a 78 to one kill rate of the 35 against these same 4th gen aircraft. Yes, the 35 is just that good. And is not static but always upgraded. Unlike the static wares from other countries. Many other countries like China and Russia overrate their aircraft. But all other countries wring out their own aircrafts necks at airshows. In other words fly them to the maximum. While the United States holds theirs back to keep this important info close to the chest. The other countries don't really have anything to lose but prestige and sales. The United States may give out certain info to suit it, but keeps back info to suit it. And in airshows the 22 and 35 is actually held back in highly strict choreographed regimes.

@rycriswell2326 2 жыл бұрын

That's good

@oneautumnleaf9293 2 жыл бұрын

F-35, F-22 probably Su-57, J-20, J-31, S-400, S-500, even newest Gripen or Rafale and more, ASEA is only in Tranche 4, which is very bad at least

@tomk3732 2 жыл бұрын

Add Su-35S, F-15EX, Super Hornet etc.

@siewyuk 2 жыл бұрын

Working Together with stealth platforms, this relic from the cold War will still be extremely effective

@themc.kennyshow6585 2 жыл бұрын

Indeed bro. F-35s mixed with these will make a formidable force

@TANKs-bs3ip 2 жыл бұрын

I would hardly call this a Cold War relic

@LIKWID 2 жыл бұрын

Cold War? I wasn't alive for the cold war and I saw this come into service with the RAF during it's very first years, nothing to do with the Cold War.

@scottwhitley3392 2 жыл бұрын

Stealth is a fantasy. Radar is developing at a much faster rate than steal technology.

@shadeix4595 2 жыл бұрын

@@scottwhitley3392 do anyone now know this? Wow, I happy too hear this

@zorandjordjevic1253 2 жыл бұрын

Dali je osposobljen na samonavodjenje ili koristi satelit Šta ako se obore sateliti

@viacheslavkozachenko5166 2 жыл бұрын

Хороший самолет

@atharvaangale 2 жыл бұрын

Rafale or Euro fighter typhoon

@darielrodriguez6984 2 жыл бұрын

Cessna 337

@bigsmoke2759 2 жыл бұрын

Rafale better

@georgebarnes8163 2 жыл бұрын

Shame a carrier version was never produced, the RN needs this aircraft more than it needs the F35 never ready barge.

@ForceM1782 2 жыл бұрын

Okay you convinced me, where can i buy one ? XD

@likklej8 2 жыл бұрын

An extra terrestrial bolide bits of comet or volcanic activity can

@chandrachurniyogi8394 2 жыл бұрын

the IAF could have acquired a fleet of 96 brand new Eurofighter Typhoon Tr4 (Block 20+) multi role interdictor strike fighter . . . it'd have replaced IAF's aging fleet of MIG-21 Bis & MIG-29 multi role fighter . . . no other fighter jet compliments the SUKHOI Su-30 MKI multi role fighter in real combat situation as much as the Eurofighter Typhoon Tr4 (Block 20+) multi role interdictor strike fighter does . . .

@shamanbhattacharyya9285 2 жыл бұрын

I was thinking that too. I was wondering why India ignored the eurofighter typhoon but looked at similar jets like the Rafale and Gripen

@kanwarrai47 2 жыл бұрын

@@shamanbhattacharyya9285 back hand politics

@chandrachurniyogi8394 2 жыл бұрын

@@shamanbhattacharyya9285 IAF's decision to continue operating the aging MIG-29 UPG multi role fighter is a mistake . . . until the AMCA comes to fruition (under emergency defense procurement protocol) the IAF should acquire an additional fleet of 98 brand new Dassault Rafale F4-R multi role interdictor strike fighter by mid 2023 . . . deliveries of the 98 brand new Dassault Rafale F4-R multi role interdictor strike fighter should not exceed any later than 2023 . . . as an alternative the IAF could have also acquired a fleet of 84 brand new F-16V Fighting Falcon (Block 72+) multi role interdictor strike fighter as an interim measure . . . compared to PAF's aging fleet of F-16 Fighting Falcon (Block 50+) multi role fighter (that are yet to be upgraded) the F-16V Fighting Falcon (Block 72+) multi role interdictor strike fighter is a different ball game altogether . . . which is why the IAF can be rest assured that when engaging PAF F-16 Fighting Falcon (Block 50+) multi role fighter with Indian Air Force F-16V Fighting Falcon (Block 72+) multi role interdictor strike fighter the IAF will always have the edge in terms of technological superiority . . .

@shamanbhattacharyya9285 2 жыл бұрын

@@kanwarrai47 More like a grudge between Britain and India

@shamanbhattacharyya9285 2 жыл бұрын

@@chandrachurniyogi8394 they should acquire Typhoon ECR instead

@milspeccress8864 2 жыл бұрын

I used to be stationed at RAF Lakenheath in England, and our F15s would fight Eurofighter regularly. I can promise you it is not a better multi role than the strike eagle. Especially with their inexperienced pilots. I’ve had a captain (0-3) teaching and leading a British colonel.(0-6) that’s a big gap in experience. Although I’ve had pilots tell me the eurofighter in a dogfight is super tough because it’s very maneuverable.

@FullThrottleRacing535 2 жыл бұрын

Typhoon is a better interceptor and dog fighter, F15 is probably better multi-role

@militaryweaponsafrica3538 2 жыл бұрын

@@FullThrottleRacing535 The F-15 Eagle is far better. You Europeans have a hard time accepting anything American is better...Very sentimental bunch.

@FullThrottleRacing535 2 жыл бұрын

@@militaryweaponsafrica3538 F15 is one of my favourite planes, i just admitted it is better than the typhoon in some areas. The typhoon is primarily a interceptor. Its a delta canard wing plane which does make it more manoeuvrable. I'm not trying to say the typhoon is better in every way, and i'm also not trying to say the F15 is better in every way. No plane can do everything perfectly and have different jobs. I think you took my comment the wrong way, so don't try to talk badly on me when i respect the F15 very much. The F15 was designed for its own role 49 years ago, the typhoon was designed for the UK's needs, which is mainly intercepting which we have to deal with a lot more than the US does. That's why it has such a high thrust to weight ratio letting it get altitude quickly.

@FullThrottleRacing535 2 жыл бұрын

@@militaryweaponsafrica3538 Also why do you have to bring " Europeans " into this? do you hate us or something? i didnt say a single bad thing about america, i praise the F15 in aircraft forums all the time, the only person talking shit here is you.

@militaryweaponsafrica3538 2 жыл бұрын

@@FullThrottleRacing535 I am African..closer to Europeans than America. But on KZfaq i notice a propensity for Europeans to bash everything about America. Its a bizzare mindset i have a hard time understanding. You know its true.

@rubenj3128 Жыл бұрын

Man, that's a ton of missiles for 1 plane. If you have that many, I know from C&C games that you'll have a huge advantage to your enemy.

@sascha9213 2 жыл бұрын

Now the important question. Why the f does the Panavia Tornado look so much cooler?

@criver127 2 жыл бұрын

Those antiques are ADORABLE.

@gordonlawrence1448 2 жыл бұрын

This is a little out of date. The engines are being upgraded with RJ2X0 which are way more powerful. IE more like 100kN full afterburner and 72kN ish dry thrust. Not only that they have the same form factor and are near 30kg lighter. In military thrust they are a tad more efficient too. That will bring the power to weight to about 1.31. For comparison the F-35 is 0.87 in the same configuration. IE Air to Air.

@nikpapado9785 2 жыл бұрын

Are you sure that the f-35 is only 0.87? If that's true then it cant accelerate while going 90degrees up, considering that this is something even the f15 can do, is a bit.... weird.

@nikpapado9785 2 жыл бұрын

@@EmperorLionflame Doesn't it has the same engine as the f22? I understand that stealth is their focus, but it seems weird for a jet so new to be underpowered.

@nikpapado9785 2 жыл бұрын

@@EmperorLionflame Thank you for your time mate

@frankcrawford416 2 жыл бұрын

@@nikpapado9785 The f35 weighs 29,000 lbs. It has thrust of 43,000. So even with 14,000 of combination of fuel and bombs it could fly straight up. I wonder how euro stacks up. Then let's stack up the euro with outside fuel tanks with fuel to compete with the f35 a 18,000 lb internal fuel load (if even possible), and same 6,000 that the 35 carries internally of bomb load out, on its hard points, and see who out maneuvers who, or who has greater top speed, or who can Supercross at 1.1, let alone who is between 20 to 1 kill ratio, up to 78 to 1 as some report.

@patricklemire9278 2 жыл бұрын

Need to use them on convoys

@PreppyAmo 2 жыл бұрын

theres still aircraft that can well compete with the typhoon and what do you mean by advanced technology i mean theres f-35s and f-22 and many aircraft with canards abdb vtol capabilities.

@Niko_from_Kepler 2 жыл бұрын

They have different roles.