I love this ministry! Thank you for bringing the truth to KZfaq! I pray that many will listen and realize how great and awesome our God is and that Jesus died for our sins.

Thank you Answers in Genesis. Your ministry is one of the main reasons my faith has grown and been restored. You are doing the work of God. Please never stop. Thank you Lord for Answers in Genesis!

The way this presentation ended made me strangely emotional. Some parts of this speech was heartbreaking to listen to, especially the impact that humanistic worldviews that are so quick to change is taken as ultimate authority when so much “evidence” keeps getting revised over time and God’s true word is left at the curb. An eye opening presentation, thank you very much. God bless you AiG Ministries. Thank you for all that you do!

Spot On! God's Word ❤❤❤ Thank You Ken!!! ❤

This is so excellent.

Reading all these comments and listening to Ken is mind bogling. Just as it is mind bogling that others say there is no God. Why should it matter how old the earth is, or on what date God created Adam? To me at least, what matters is that God created all there is, that His Son Jesus paid for my sins, making it possible for me to to gain everlasting life through Jesus Christ, and that the Holy Spirit is with me, every moment of my life to remind me of these facts. There are things we humans are NOT suppose to know, and in gaining that forbidden knowledge we will suffer the penalty as Adam and Eve did.

I wish I could live in a DAY where at least one world leader could have the knowledge that this guy has 😢

I believe that God creates in 6 days. This is a faith issue.

This is very interesting and I've always wondered about this. Thank you

Excellent video💯👏

Thank you very much,...like always very eyes opening. Let God be with us!❤

Thanks!

This is a very powerful presentation. Thank you for this exposition.

Why is the age of the earth so conflicting? Creation took place in eternity, before the fall, where events happen at a much quickened pace, thus the age of the earth will seem much older from the perspective of our laws of physics in time/space, compared to that of eternity.. It is like comparing apples to oranges! Why does this simple explanation elude just about everyone? The answer to this question is so simple and everyone makes the answer so complicated!

In Hebrew we learn that words get their meaning from their first usage (amongst other ways), often by the first time a situation arises they create a word to resemble it, and so with the naming of newborns like Isaac and Ishmael coming from the situation of their birth, both names meaning types of laughter/jokes. And yet in Genesis 1, the word DAY is first used in reference to "and God called the Light Day" and in that same verse "and the evening and the morning were the first day". But that's also where we get the first use of the word "call". So to call something or as it is otherwise translated elsewhere to cry, read or proclaim something, is to make one equal to another, and so the end of the verse and the start of the verse, if you take it deep enough, because "and the evening and the morning were the first Light", because he called the light day. So everywhere you see the word day, it is the name for the light. But if you translate "he called" as the one word it is, well, "he" is not capitalised, so perhaps it was "man" that named light. "God called the light day and he called the darkness Night", and they don't have punctuation so it could also be "God called the light day; and he called the darkness Night" as in, where God sees light, man sees darkness. As the word "he called" is nowadays also translated as "biblical scholar" or "gourd" or "pumpkin" or "squash", but most commonly "read". So: "and God read the light day". And if you remove the "call" from the full word meaning "and he called" you just get "and". "God and read the light day". There's no capitals in Hebrew, so it may not be about naming the light as day, but it's also about 'reading the day of the light.' When you learn Hebrew from Hebrew readers, you learn that it is both figurative and literal, and there's a lot more meaning in the words than in what we read in english. So if he called the darkness night, and then in the same verse it says "the evening and the morning were the first day". Why is it not "the morning and the evening" as we know of it today? Because it is figurative and symbolic. If you order things from taking the darkness of life into account and dealing with it before looking at the light, then that itself is a light in and of itself. And so if it was also good. And if each "day" or "light" of creation is good, then "the light is good", so "seeing the darkness before the light" is good. Which is the order of creation, when darkness existed before God created light. But God still created darkness, it's just that darkness did not exist until when? Until God created the Earth, which was formless and void and darkness was upon the face of the deep. But darkness also means "secrecy" and face has no "the" and like that it is only and never otherwise translated as "penny", and the word "upon" is hyphenated with "penny", and also means "about". And the word "formless" means "wonder" but if you take away the last inflection of the last letter it becomes "confused", take the letter away and it becomes "tea". Each word in Hebrew is built out of other words, and each letter has a name which is itself a word. For the word "formless" it's first letter is the last letter of the Hebrew alphabet and the last letter of the hebrew word "truth", which is made of the first, middle and last letters of Hebrew, it is the number 400, and when you spell it's name out with other letters it is the word meaning "theo" or "note", and the second letter is the first letter in the word for GOD (Elohim), when it is at the beginning of a word it can either mean "the" or the beginning of a sentence to signify asking a question, or it can also mean "who", and as a word it means "here is" or "to be disturbed", and is pronounced "hey", it is used twice in the name of GOD (YHWH) where the first letter means "hand" and the other letter means "and", so "hand of god and god", and that last letter of "formless" is that same letter meaning "and". So "formless" becomes "note of God and", and to spell the last letter meaning "and" you just write two of itself "and and" and means "hook" or "hasp" or "wow". "Note of God and be hooked", or "note the wow". The idea of studying Hebrew and the word of god, is not about who wrote what or what is written, but what can be written with it and what it can mean and what you can interpret from it. When you learn Hebrew from Hebrews it's always about the connections between all the possibilities and what lines up. Not about taking a hard line towards one single way. For everything there is a season. But that being said, 6 days, is the way.

Great job Mr. Ham. Keep it up.

Just had a 'Revelation' of my own Ken as I was listening and watching this lecture. It happened just after you produced the horrible textbook and read the first statement! Earlier you explained how cleverly God had given us the age of the earth. 'The Revalation = The years of the earth's longevity stated clearly in the Bible, STARTED with Adam, but ENDED with JESUS! GOD KNEW THE FUTURE so He knew that Christianity would grow as it has: He knew that we Christians would begin Our Own recording of time from the date of Christ's birth, which then would last until the end of the era, when Jesus returns! ' PROOF OF GOD in my eyes! ONLY GOD KNEW THAT TIME WOULD BE SO RELEVANT TOWARD THE END OF THE AGE, so in HIS OWN inimicable way, through His words in the Bible, HE provided irrevocable proofs of earth's timeline from the beginning of creation. Furthermore, He's still doing it! I was in BC Canada 500 miles north, when Mount St Helen's erupted. Upstairs, walking along the carpeted floor in the main hall of my home, I suddenly felt light tremors under my bare feet! As the house was built on solid rock, I didn't know what to make of this, but clearly remember feeling anxious at the time. It was later that I heard the news of the eruption. The information that has been amassed in the years following that eruption has provided so much evidence, in ALL spheres of science, geology, Biology etc., to show that Biblical truth is to be absolutely trusted against anything man can put forward. God knew what would be needed and provided in a timely fashion AND also with minimal loss of life! I do like the way God works. Thank you Ken and your team, for following God's guidance, our own, modern day Noah! I'll continue with the lecture now.

Pastor Ken, Good morning. Thank you, emphasized that God creations are very important to understand what he did.

We were not designed, we evolved, Fact, unless you are going to admit all the design faults with a human were intentional

Finally, after all these years, you answered my questions ! Thank you for sharing.

Ken Ham and his entire ministry is a massive blessing for this age.

One word. Amen!

Why can't young earthers admit that things "appear" to be very aged but God could cause that through a miracle. Old earth creationist would probably go hmmm, that's possible I guess. And they could move on happily together. Most young earthers can't be content with that like an old earth creationist and I think it's odd that they'd rather have friction than say God could do that if he wanted.

“God forbid: yea, let God be true, BUT EVERY MAN A LIAR.” (Romans 3:4) “That by two immutable things, in which it was IMPOSSIBLE FOR GOD TO LIE” (Hebrews 6:18) “Sanctify them through thy truth: THY WORD IS TRUTH.” (John 17:17)

***it just do not matter, matter or not it will not add or remove one second to the age as "the universe unfolds as it should" ***

Here's my issue from a hermeneutics (biblical interpretation) stand point. Six days is one thing. The Bible clearly says "first day", "second day", etc. However, nowhere does the Bible clearly state the age of the earth. People got that by adding up the ages in the early Genesis genealogies. However, I don't believe the /purpose/ of the genealogies was to give us the age of the earth. After all, if God really wanted us to know the age of the earth, He could have put "and the world was X years old when Y happened". So should we really be using biblical texts to answer a question that God wasn't addressing? What if God didn't give us enough information to know the age of the earth because us knowing the age of the earth wasn't one of His priorities? WE care about the age of the earth in modern times because of evolution. But that wasn't a concern when the Bible was written. I don't think God was thinking "I'd better be sure the earth is young, because thousands of years later, mankind will come up with a theory of evolution which excludes Me, and the only way Christians can defend Me is if there's not enough time for evolution to happen". Isn't it adding to Scripture to assume that it must be answering our modern questions? What if instead, we read it to find out the questions that God is actually answering, and we made those questions and answers our priorities as Christians?

18:36 "Where does the 7-day week come from?" - A phase of the moon.

I hate follow up with another comment but I’m reading the Bible right now and in Genesis 42 it says “all of the world came to Egypt to buy food”

The only thing that confuses me when people say sin is what brought death is Gen 3:22-23. The bible says the tree of life is what would have allowed Adam and Eve to live forever. Which leads me to think if they wouldn't have eaten of it, even if they didn't sin, they would still have died. Evil already existed, because of Satan decision. It wasn't mankind's sin, but it was still sin. The bible says the Tree of life will be in the New Jerusalem in Rev 22. Which makes me think that is what will allow us to live forever again. Otherwise what is the point of having it in the garden and also in the new Jerusalem. This is where my brain goes when I read this. Maybe it is to technical, or a wrong interpretation on my part, but everytime I read it I question why preachers only preach that sin is what caused death. Not the fact that being separated from the tree is what caused death. I would like to appreciate a loving response to this. Lol whether agreeing or disagreeing. This one point always makes me think about things a little harder. To me it seems like sin didn't really cause death, but it led to a consequence of seperation from the source of life. Death could have still existed though. If a decision was made not to eat. Am I thinking to hard about this?

If we evolved in knowledge and our technology grew only in the past few hundred years , what was holding back mankind in the millions of previous years ? Thousands of years is more likely.

This is constructive criticism from a Christian and I really don't know the answers to these questions, but they are concerning: 1.) In Genesis 1:1, all of the matter in existence was created before the advent of light itself, and the division of day from night. Plainly Scripture then is saying that the first day was longer than 24 hours because a full day and full night follow after the initial creation of everything. 2.) Also, in Genesis 2:4, the Scripture refers to the singular day ( ἡμέρᾳ) in which the earth was made. This is conveniently edited out of the NIV, but is there in the interlinear text. Here the rationalizing Protestant translators who want the Bible narrative to support their pet theology save us from wondering whether Scripture is commanding us to believe that the Creation days were exactly 24 hours long. Which is literally true: Genesis 1 or Genesis 2; since one says say six days and the other one day? In my opinion, the only way to harmonize both statements is to interpret the word "day" to mean something like "back in the day", rather than like, "Tuesday." It is facially and literally self-contradictory otherwise and we can't have that - and the act of removing the offending text from the translation is not a legitimate solution. 3.) In Genesis 1:28 God instructs man and woman (not named Adam and Eve) to be fruitful and multiply and spread over the earth before then calling all good and resting. Yet in Genesis 2, Adam and Eve do not have children until after the Fall and being cast from Eden. So were man and woman disobeying God by not reproducing during the sixth day, in which case how could God have said it was good? Or were Adam and Eve not the man and woman referred to? 4.) In Genesis 1:26 the interlinear text uses the word "ποιήσωμεν" for the verb "create, make" man and woman. In Genesis 2:7 the Greek word is "ἔπλασεν," or "shape, form" Adam. These are clearly distinct in their meaning, where the first refers to the act of creation of something that previously had no existence, and the second to working on something that exists already. What mystery is being concealed here? The standard Orthodox Christian answer is to read the Holy Fathers and to believe as they did. I tried this, but the mystery only got deeper. The patristic authority would be St. Basil's The Hexameron (The Six Days). That sounds like it would have an answer but in fact it only covers the first five days because St. Basil died before.completing the book. Making this even more mysterious was the story that he has a vision from God in which he was told aforehand that he would not reveal the mystery of the sixth day before he died. So what I am saying to you is that there are great mysteries still to be fathomed in the Creation of both the world and Man, and as tempting as it is to want to have a pat answer for the sake of defending the faith, one must sometimes allow the mystery to be.

You said it yourself Ken. "It was good!" Then " it was not good." Well it wouldn't be very good if it went from good to not good at the very time he was finishing. It was probably good for some time. An undefined amount of time. Then Adam was put in a garden 6 or 7 thousand years ago. Don't lump me with them. Millions of years is preposterous. But I don't cut out the change in Gods attitude toward his creation like it took no time at all . Eve was confronted on the firs day after her creation. That dosent sound good. You give God no time at all to enjoy the good he created, that dosen't sound good. I think you're off as well. By some undefined, realistic amount of time. I enjoy your work greatly. You've been blessed. Keep it up.

I do believe in God’s word, and really like your videos… you follow the Bible and have helped me in dispelling a lot of ‘fairytales’ from my childhood/Sunday school days. HOWEVER, would you please never say ‘second coming’ again as it is not in the Bible… Jesus says, …when I return…

The Lord our God made a covenant with the darkness that it can not remain when we pray that our flight will not take place in winter or on the sabbath.

We are all sick and need Jesus!

Thanks for being calm about this. But here is a question for you. According to Genesis, God didn't create the sun, moon, and stars until the THIRD day. We all know a literal day is defined by one rotation of the earth (or if you're a flat earther, one rotation of the sun around the flat disc of earth). So IF the first couple of days happened before the sun was created, how were those days defined? And the earth was created BEFORE the sun? That's what the bible LITERALLY says. HMMMMMMM. Jesus also said that if "The Temple were torn down he would rebuild it in three days". Is this the literal temple or a figurative one? The literal one took 46 years to build the first time. Jesus also said Pete was the rock upon which he would build his church. Is Peter, the literal rock, typical Judean limestone or more durable granite, or is this a symbolic reading??

People who refuse to acknowledge that their interpretation of the Earths age could be wrong are the same kind of people who called Galileo a heretic.

Yet the acts of man can not save nor condemn him, For man was condemned from the beginning, and Christ stated only the Father chooses who comes unto Christ 😬

The young earth argument is ridiculous for Christians to use. The fact is, we don’t know. Ken Hamm is taking the proverbs 30:5-6 out of context. The Bible is being interpreted from Greek and Hebrew. It could be a bad translation. A prophetical year is different from our year. The saying of day has different meaning. What does “back in the day” mean. “The day of the lord”. So Saying that we may not understand what a day is to God is not taking it out of context. It says morning and evening. Not 24 hrs. In the beginning. Well Ken tell us when the beginning was? Man wasn’t created until the fifth day. We can know how long man has been on earth but we have know idea how old earth or the universe is. And this is not a salvation issue. It’s a secondary issue. Dr. Frank Turek explains this in great detail. I’d advise everyone to watch his debates and listen or read his books.

“Remember the Sabbath day by keeping it holy. 9 Six days you shall labor and do all your work, 10 but the seventh day is a sabbath to the LORD your God. On it you shall not do any work, neither you, nor your son or daughter, nor your male or female servant, nor your animals, nor any foreigner residing in your towns. FOR IN SIX DAYS the LORD made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, but he rested on the seventh day. Therefore the LORD blessed the Sabbath day and made it holy. “(Exodus 20:8-11). The writer of Genesis is using the creation account of 6 days work/1 day rest as the model of the Sabbath rest. I believe we take God at his word that it was 6 literal days.

God creates in 6 days. Nature would take millions of years. This is what non believers can never grasp.

What an excellent defense of the 6 days of creation & 1 day of rest. I wasn’t as informed as this man to defend it, but I was aware of the significance for why he chose 7 days, that ties into everything as the reason, but it always amazes me that anyone who believes that God is omnipresent,omniscient, all powerful, who created time and is outside of time, would have been hamstrung by time that he created, as if he needed any time. Or that he had problem communicating what he wanted us to know for how long it took, so it must’ve been misinterpreted in translation, or he was mistaken, because we know that he couldn’t have created everything that fast. It’s absolutely absurd, especially coming from people who should know better.

I do indeed believe in six literal days.

What is the exact number of years that was round off to "..about 450 years" as stated in Acts 13:17-20 E.S.V.?

Satan has attacked everything God has established. The attack on God's Word is evident with the statement of millions of years.

The six day of creation is a reference to the fact, God exists moves and creates outside of the restraints of time. One day to Him is like a thousand years. It may aswell be a million or even a billion years. Time only matters to you. When God moves, He moves. The six days is a reference to the timeline He has set up for humanity.

Two issues are being conflated here. One is whether or not the six days are literal, and the other is the age of the earth. In six literal periods of day and night, God could have created the earth, and finished creating on the sixth day, making animals and humanity only about six thousand years ago, while the age of the planet we live on could be 4.6 billion years as we measure time today. The age of living beings could only be six thousand years or so, with no death prior to the seventh day, while the age of the planet could be in billions of years. All that would mean is that God miraculously had very few cycles of daylight and nighttime - what the Bible refers to as "days" in Genesis 1 - during the 4.6 billion year period. (The only reason we think the days couldn't have been that long, is that from man's way of thinking and from what modern science tells us about what a day is, we think a day has to take place in a certain period of time, with day and night based on the earth's rotation, and the rotation speed being calculable and consistent (predictable) according to modern science.) This logical possibility seems to be ruled out by Ken Ham at the beginning of the video, and I don't have much hope that it will be pointed out later on in the video either.

The bible is truth it's GOD the LORD our SAVIOR word

1 am..is it 'morning' or 'night'? If, it is 'morning' take a peep outside the window..darkness!

God created everything except for the one thing mankind created. And that one thing man created is “NONSENSE.”

To man it's thousand years, to God it's a day. It still adds up to 6 days/6000 thousand years. It's probably more like 7000 thousand years. God rested on the 7th day.

I would enjoy a compelling refutation of the argument that the LXX gives the correct ages between Shem and Terah, because the work done by Nathan Hoffman and Doug Woodward on this topic is extremely persuasive. Why is the Masoretic text deemed by AiG to be more likely correct?

If God created the universe out of nothing just by His word, creating the world in 6 days is no problem!

The way I understand Gen 1:1 is that God created Earth when he created space. It just says it was "in the begining". And then it says it was empty and desorderly and the Spirit of God moved about on the abyss. Then it proceeds to explain the 6-day creation. Earth could be a zillion years old, we dont know because God didn't say, He just said "in the begining". But the organization, the inside creation, and the functionality of Earth was created in six days, according to scripture.

It doesn’t matter how long it took God to create the Earth and the people that live in it. The most important thing is that God is the creator. Look in Genesis and you will see that God created the moon and the sun on the fourth day. The moon and the sun are used to tell time. If they did not exist for the three and a half Days before then who’s days are in those first four days there was no way to determine what a day is so they have to be gods days not days as we know them today. Remember the first five books of the Bible were dictated to Moses by God. Therefore they are not inspired but by the direct dictation. Books all 5 of them.

Given that the sun wasn't created until the fourth day, these are clearly NOT 24 hour solar days.

In Matthew 24:36-44, Jesus himself actually affirms global Noah’s flood, specifically at verse 39.

Genesis 1:3 God said “Let there be LIGHT,” (initial light). Genesis 1:14 God said let there be LIGHTS (used the initial LIGHT to then make the sun, moon, etc) A lot like striking 'a' match and using it to set multiple fires.

Now here's where I don't agree with our brother, when he says the virgin birth is not tied to our salvation. You see, it is important that Jesus is born of a virgin because if He is born the same way as all of us, of a man and a woman, He cannot save us; because He would have inherited the Adamic sin nature and if He is tainted with any sin then He would not have risen. Also how can we trust God to save us if He has lied through the mouth of His prophets and told us about the virgin birth; may it never be indeed. "But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, To redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons" Galatians 4:4-5

16:51 matthew 18:16. Let everything be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.

Who gave them the authority to date number and time anyting how do they know they were not here and how can you determine that something is a billion years old how do you have the mathematic the technological and the scientific knowledge to do that you don't have that authority to decide how old something is and what it shouldn't should not be

yes it really matters the age of creation because everything that was created by God is for his Son Jesus as an heir. The universe was created for Christ

Who knows what 6 days were…

The sun was created after vegetation on the earth . How did the vegetation survive millions of years with out the sun's light? God does things contrary to the wisdom of man. To expose the vain philosophy of man which is contrary to the so called wisdom of man !

24:00 Glad that someone has finally taken Pat Robertson to task. Pat is a good brother in Christ, but his view of and 'faith' in evolution is way off the mark. Ken is a blessing in Bible accuracy, and Pat would be better off if he listened to Biblical reasoning.

I believe God could have created the world in 6 ordinary 24 hour days and I believe God could have done it in 6 periods of time that were more than 24 hours (what if they were 30 hour days back then?), and I believe God could have created an old earth such that it is physically older than it really is. For example, when God created Adam, I assume he created him as a full grown man that would have the markings of someone in their teens or 20’s, but was actually just one day old. I don’t believe this is something we need to be dogmatic about. As Paul said, we should not argue about words. Let’s focus on Jesus Christ, His Lordship, His death and resurrection, His payment for all our sins, wiping them out from our records, Our worship of Him, Our service to Him, Our fellowship and love for one another.

What's weird is God created day and night before the sun. So now when I look at His creation and see how day and night works by the sun, it doesn't make sense. His word is pure and creation is corrupt, but I cannot see how sin corrupted day and night to depend on the sun.

For your information: "thorns and thistles" does not apply to plants and animals, but to man only. Gen.3:17-19 was address to Adam by God. Please, dont deviate from what was subject of the paragraph.

I agree with your analysis but could the timeline at the beginning of your video be off? At 8:45 you state: “…God made Adam on day 6”. This is not what Genesis 6:27 actually says…”male and female created he them.” 6th day man was created before Adam. It’s not until 2:7 that Adam was created from the dust of the ground. After the 7th day is described. Not sure this matters to your timeline but wanted to mention it.

Two opposing things cannot be true at the same time. God is not the author of confusion. That problem emerges from elsewhere. Paul warned in his letters to Timothy that there would be apostasy, brought about by different groups forming around doctrines that appealed to them, and teachers willing to make popular compromises. As Paul also wrote in "chapter 2" of his second letter to the Thessalonians, the lovers of truth are those who do not fall for these deviations from the traditions that had already been established by Christ and His apostles ...who based their revelation of the Gospel on the proper interpretation of the Old Testament, (the Law and the Prophets) including Genesis. At the end of the day, believing and speaking the same things regarding His word is not only possible, but expected. And no, it's not a matter of choosing the right extra-biblical institution to tell us, and calling the collection of them "the Church" as if this is what Jesus built. We know what an evening and morning cycle is. The question is, how many other compromises occurred across history to bring us to the point where it's difficult to understand what a day means? Posting this comment three years after this lecture, we find confusion in the culture over how many genders exist. Surely, none of the various apostate "church" organizations would adopt that confusion... and we're right back to Rom 1.

If you accept reality, the narrative in the bible falls apart. To accept the bible, you have to deny reality.

Which day did God make the angels

In the 1st line it is already mentioned that heaven and earth were created. Is there an explanation for the 1st line in the Bible and the 5th line? In the 5th line it had been evening and there was morning, the 1st day. What then happened between the 1st line and the 5th line if the 1st day is only mentioned in the 5th line?

Man cannot create life but nature can ??? The whole thing, is I think, is life . What makes something alive ?

The question I ask is if it was a twenty four hour day then in the day Adam and eve ate of the forbidden fruit that would of been the end for them but scripture says Adam lived over 900 years less then a thousand years as scripture also says a thousand years to God is one day and one day a thousand years so I think a creational day is not twenty four hours God created time for man not for himself the other reason is God tested on the seventh day but yet her we are living and God is still working s Amount man so God has not really rested from all his works

look into mud fossill university by roger

I believe God gave us the sun and moon to keep time. And the sun, moon and stars weren’t created until the fourth day. Prior to that days couldn’t have been ordinary, not that God couldn’t created everything in six ordinary days as he is all powerful. However I also believe that our mind and God’s are completely opposite. Furthermore, can we even comprehend God’s experience of time at all? As a day is like a thousand years and a thousand years is like a day. All in all our experience in this time is finite. So take from that what you will.

I've always been curious about how long Adam and Eve lived in the garden of eden. It's not really relevant to the current topic. People seem to assume that it was a short period of time, but in an undying population, it could have been thousands of years just as easily..

they use the argument that we cant use our perception of time now to assume things about the past but how do they explain how we use our perception of time now to accurately predict things in the distant future

You either believe all the bible or none of it. I Died as a teenager and was sent back. Let me tell people that can hear. When God speaks it is 100% true. More true than humans can even understand. His words penetrate every cell in your body. When I seen Jesus I instantly knew who he was then he had what looked like multi color flame's coming from his eyes but it wasn't flame's it was love. When it hit me I instantly knew how much he loves us. And will forever another concept we humans can not equate. Forever is not a long time. "It is" I was only 12 in 1977 a country boy on a farm in the Mississippi Delta had not been to church very much up to that point. But it changed me. And people noticed my parents wasn't Christian's I never told them I knew if I did it would be a beating. Because I went to a old lake with a few of my friends and my parents told not to go there. I had old blue jeans on and when I went to the bottom of the lake to push my self up like I have done dozens time's and it was deep I say 15 or 20 ft and very muddy when I hit bottom it felt like something grabbed my legs and the more I tried to get lose the tighter it got I felt down to my legs and realized it was bobwire. I could see my friends looking down at me barely then they ran off. I find out later to get help from the old rancher that owned the lake. But he lived probably 2 miles from the lake . Then as I kept looking up a beautiful warming loving light came down and it felt like it carefully picked me up and with a instant I was sitting on the beautiful rolling hill and Jesus was standing in front of me. The first thing I noticed was the unbelievable colors and the great smell's that's hard to explain but you know the smell loves you. As Jesus started walking to me I noticed the grass and each blade was a different color of glittery green and look like they had different colors precious stones in them. But as Jesus walked to me the grass was like waving and praising Jesus and when he stepped on the grass they didn't fold like when we walk on grass. Even the air felt like it was praising Jesus. There was so much he showed me until this day I still remember stuff from that experience. Back to the age of earth. It was created in 6 days and his 1 day of rest. Then we had Adam and eve I don't how long they was in the garden before there disobedience to God. So many people has different theories any where from 24 hours to millions of years. Alot of people stick to the 130 years. But that was after the sin. Before the sin adem and eve would have never died . So it could have been 100 billion years they was in the garden or it could have been 20 minutes.

What is wrong with this idea: that in Genesis 1:1 we have a bare statement that created the heavens and the earth, then in vs two, attention is turned to earth, a darkened and empty unfinished earth. For six days, then, God outfits the earth to be a habital place for man as it reads in the rest of the chapter. The appearance of the moon, sun, and stars would simply be the removal of the darkness enshrouding earth to make the sun and moon and stars created in the verse one statement.

God created a mature universe in 6 literal days, spins of the earth on its axis. Just as He created a mature Adam in the garden on the 6th literal day. Also, Genesis chapter 2 explains God creating Adam, placing him in the garden and then creating one more of each animal, the rest of the earth is already full of animals and plants, so that Adam can name each one and pick a wife. Adam names and rejects all of the animals, so God puts Adam to sleep, and creates Eve. Eve was the very last thing created by God, so she did not witness God create anything, she had to take her husband's word for it, and how well do women listen to their husband's even today? So therefore, it was easier for the serpent to approach and deceive Eve. You also notice that she misquotes the word of God. Adam, knowing that God would have to destroy Eve for disobeying, became sin himself to save her, which is a picture of Christ, becoming sin for God's love for us.

Jesus said in Matthew 7:21, "Not everyone who says to Me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of Heaven, but the one who does the will of My Father Who is in Heaven will enter." Just because someone says they're a Christian, doesn't mean they are.

There is no definitive way to know what time schedule God operated on at that juncture but it seems there was periods of work followed by periods of rest...although he seems to rest on the seventh day after 6 days of work...but either way there is a time separation of some sort...first he did then then next day this...why would you seperate the days though is all the work was together....but anyhow...if God was subjecting himself to our time frame..couldn't he have been working on sections of creation for eons?

For I decided to know nothing among you except Creation, and that in six days. A strange hill to die on. Whenever the transmission of cause and effect in a system is broken, science becomes untenable. Yet that hasn't stopped Evangelical belief from mirroring Asgard in the Marvel universe, a place of both magic and science. A sweater is made using a thread of science until that thread snaps or contradicts assumptions, at which time a thread of magic is employed to finish the garment. The new sweater is then proudly worn, ignoring the biblical warning against mixing two kinds of threads. Fact isn't truth and truth isn't fact. They parallel but they do not substitute for each other.

What if God came to this planet today hidden in man. And said I'll create a new solar system in the darkness of space away from the milky way which we dwell?

2 tares you cant trust everyone were not all the same the bible tells you so read the book yourself dont let anyone read and think for you

Amen

What was "morning" and "evening" before there was a sun?

Clear, concise and totally believable. The authority of the Word begins stands true. Thank you for standing for truth!

Where in the Genesis story does it say "and the evening and the morning were the seventh day"?

Question. Are "all" the words in the Jewish book the words of God? [2] What proof have you apart from blind belief? [3] What is the story of Chapter 6 of Genisis? [4] Dates of the written history' of the many races of humanity. [5] How long did it take to populate the earth? [6] How long did it take for the various species of man to evolve. [Not from monkeys] For example In Africa alone there are at least four. For once you know, you can then possibly calculate the date of the flood and then the date of creation' commencement. For all the above had to happen some months before the above taking place. To get started Mesopotamian written history and all writings since, right up to today in that area of the world, commenced around 6000 years ago. Jewish history was put into the writing around 2600 years ago. But if the flood was localized in say the lowest point on the planed, that is the Jordan River valley which comes to an abrupt ending at the western edge of the Dead Sea, all is possible, possibly? Oh, and forget about fossils and the first reference to the ARK related to an oblong four-sided box with a flat bottom to carry legal documents in. So that could be the design of the craft Noah used to save himself, his family and their livestock?

hello world

What was the exact date of Christ's birth? what month, day, & year?

I get your point Ken and commend you for your argument! ! Given this point, do you observe the Sabbath day in honour of GOD having made everything in 6 days and rested and sanctified the 7th day ? And as the 4th commandment tells us to do ?

Proverbs 16:3 3 Commit thy works unto the Lord, and thy thoughts shall be established. Man: I gotta see it to believe it! 🤔 God: Believe my Word and you will get understanding.😉

Well the 1 day of creation is God's 1day which is equal to 1000 earth years. The plant God resides on rotates 1 time is equal to earth's 1000 years. So this mother earth was created in 6000 years and god rested 1000 years which basically is one week or 7 days and then day eight Adam and Eve was created. Christ lived at the end of day 11and we are now at the end of day 13 when Christ returns about to enter the morning of the first resurrection or the beginning of day 14.

I believe that the Jehovah Witnesses are right when they say that God created the Earth in six periods of time instead of six days (literally?) That 's not what the Science has demonstrated.

The "young earth" idea is not supported by the bible, although the bible is very unclear. In Genesis 1, God created everything in six days, on the seventh day he rested. Genesis 2 tells of a time when there was no man on the earth ("and there was no man to work the ground"). Whether this means that there were only women left or all humans were gone is not clear. So god created all living things again, now starting with Adam. The bible doesn't tell when this happened, it might have been on "day 8" or many million of years after the first creation. Creationists make the error to think that Adam was created on the seventh day, but it is also possible that he was created billions of years after that.

In gen 2 4 what are the generations?