When I consider the heavens, what is God that man should not be mindful of Him.

Man is something, that can be reasonably inferred. Scripturally speaking, we will rule of nations on the new Earth, and judge the angels. So there's that stuff.

And in that process of understanding, they realized that a god wasn't necessary in explaining what they saw.

@@manamanathegreat4986hum, nope. It only becomes more obvious that there is a creator and designer

@@manamanathegreat4986 Yeh, because it makes so much more sense to say that the universe was created from nothing by nothing. /s Real logic right there.

@@svoncampe .... well, bless your heart.

@hoptoads .... oh sweetie, if wanted to let me know that you don't understand Cosmology, you could have just said so directly.

Now we just have to figure out the question.

@@bradfordreed6175 That would take a computer the size of a planet.

@@bradfordreed6175 How many times do you need to fold a piece of paper in half till the thickness reaches the moon.

42 what?

@@avafury4584it’s 36 not 42

​@razark9 you will change your mind when you stand before Him.

​@@paulanthony7464Why ???

@michelledavis-classicalg-cp8byI’m really sad for you

Ha Ha! No they don't.

There is no heaven, only the Kingdom of God! Get that correct first.

Abraham's descendants are as numerous as the stars. How many stars are there

@@douglasparise3986 a lot

It's not the reason but an example of our faith in Christ

@@JesusistheonetrueGod trillions?

The point I'm trying to make is that even God showed Abraham evidence and that we do not believe blindly in God.

But fish can see too and they don't have gods because they don't need them.😊

@@batcollins3714 actually all of creation praises God 🙂

God also gave us a brain and a world to explore with it. A world that constantly provides evidence for biological evolution.

@@jockyoung4491 the human brain cannot fathom the infinite God unless that infinite God helps them to understand. The only way God will do that is if that human being actually humbles themself. Otherwise you are left saying the goofy things you just said.

@@zerosteel0123 If the infinite God cannot be fathomed with mere human words, then it makes no sense to insist that the Bible has to be literally true. The only claims I make are about science, which can't say anything about God. Whether God exists or not, biological evolution happened and continues to happen.

@michelledavis-classicalg-cp8by The Son of God.

@michelledavis-classicalg-cp8by 1 John 4:15 Whosoever shall confess that Jesus is the Son of God, God dwelleth in him, and he in God.

​@nicholasisaiah53john316 Jesus the failed end times preacher? --------------------------------------------------------- *Jesus is clearly speaking to the disciples and gives a timeframe for when the Son of Man would come.* "Jesus sent these twelve out, charging them, saying: Do not go into the way of the nations, and do not go into a Samaritan city. But rather go to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. And going on, proclaim, saying, The kingdom of Heaven has drawn near" (Matthew 10:5-7) “Truly I say to you, ***you will not finish going through the cities of Israel until the Son of Man comes”*** (Matthew 10:23); For the *Son of man* shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; ***and then he shall reward every man according to his works.*** Truly I tell you, ***some who are standing here will not taste death*** before they see the *Son of Man* coming in his kingdom (Matthew 16:27-28) Truly I tell you, ***some who are standing here*** will not taste death before they see the kingdom of God (Luke 9:27) Truly I tell you, ***this generation will certainly not pass away*** until all these things have happened (Mark 13:30) *He says that the coming of the Son of Man will be accompanied by:* The sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from the sky, and the heavenly bodies will be shaken. Then will appear the sign of the *Son of Man* in heaven. And then all the peoples of the earth will mourn when they see the *Son of Man* coming on the clouds of heaven, with power and great glory. And he will send his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of the heavens to the other. Truly I tell you, ***this generation will certainly not pass away*** until all these things have happened (Matthew 24:29-34) There will be signs in the sun, moon and stars. On the earth, nations will be in anguish and perplexity at the roaring and tossing of the sea. People will faint from terror, apprehensive of what is coming on the world, for the heavenly bodies will be shaken. At that time they will see the *Son of Man* coming in a cloud with power and great glory. When these things begin to take place, stand up and lift up your heads, because your redemption is drawing near. When you see these things happening, you know that the kingdom of God is near. Truly I tell you, ***this generation will certainly not pass away*** until all these things have happened (Luke 21:25-32) He also falsely prophesied to the high priest, the Sanhedrin and Nathaniel. *Jesus falsely prophesied to the high priest and the Sanhedrin* Jesus also falsely prophesied to the high priest and the Sanhedrin (assemblies of either twenty-three or seventy-one rabbis appointed to sit as a tribunal) You will see the *Son of Man* sitting at the right hand of the Mighty One and ***coming on the clouds of heaven*** (Matthew 26:64) (Mark 14:62) Except the high priest and the Sanhedrin never saw Jesus sitting at the right hand side of God, or coming on the clouds of heaven, or any such thing. *Jesus falsely prophesied to Nathaniel* Jesus also falsely prophesied to Nathaniel when he declared, “Rabbi, you are the Son of God; you are the king of Israel.” Jesus said, You believe because I told you I saw you under the fig tree. You will see greater things than that. He then added, ***“Very truly I tell you, you will see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending on the Son of Man*** (John 1:50-51) *Nathaniel never saw any such thing. Neither did anyone else.* ------------------------------------------------------------------ Also look up: Watch *Jesus: Apocalyptic Prophet, Historical Lecture - Bart D. Ehrman* *"End Times - Evil Bible .com"* *"The End of All Things is At Hand - The Church Of Truth"* *"ex-apologist: On One of the Main Reasons Why I Think Christianity is False (Reposted)"* *"Jesus the Apocalyptic Prophet - History for Atheists"* (Tim O'Neill is a former Christian and is familiar with most of the Biblical scholarship. He's been studying the scholarship and history for decades) *"Jesus’ Failed Prophecy About His Return - Black Nonbelievers, Inc."* Also, how cognitive dissonance possibly explains early Christianity. *“The Rationalization Hypothesis: Is a Vision of Jesus Necessary for the Rise of the Resurrection Belief?”* - by Kris Komarnitsky | Κέλσος - Wordpress *"February 2015 - Escaping Christian Fundamentalism"* - Isaiah 53 *"Jesus and the Messianic Prophecies - Did the Old Testament Point to Jesus? - The Bart Ehrman Blog"* *"Did Jesus Fulfill Prophecy? | Westar Institute"* *"Jesus Was Not the Only “Prophet” to Predict the Destruction of the Temple - Escaping Christian Fundamentalism"* *"What Do the Apostles’ Deaths Prove? Guest Post by Kyle Smith. - The Bart Ehrman Blog"*

Praise Thor! Sorry we stopped praying to him and he isn't a god anymore. Lesson learnt.

@@peterbreis5407 We have new gods now who are much better! You should give them a try!

I believe in God our Father, I believr in Christ the Son, I believe in the Holy Spirit, our God is three in. I believe in the resurrection, that we will rise again, and I believe in the name of Jesus. Amen.

@michelledavis-classicalg-cp8by evolution also belief, not fact, a beliefe with an imposible origin, that all things are a result of accidents, accident in a series of accidents. Good luck.

@@binhanh296 God Bless you! And don't let the "scoffers" get you down. Believe me. on Judgement Day, they will be weeping and "knashing" their teeth.

​@mikeguthrie5432 It is sad. All those lost souls. Pray more intensely as our time to reach them is running out.

@@mikeguthrie5432 Let's just get this straight. You are admonishing so-called "scoffers", while at the same time gloating over the idea that they will be made to suffer. Nice. And your advice is "believe me". Who on earth are you to tell me to "believe you" ? You would never consider beliving me. Nor would I contemplate anything so presumptuous as telling you to do so. If believing you entails threatening all non-believers (including all Hindus, Sikhs, Shintos, Parsis...) with excrutiating torment (and seemingly deriving some sort of satisfaction from it), you are the last person I would believe.

Cool story!😎 Thanks for that!🫡

That would make Hubble your 2nd cousin, 3 times removed. Definitely a cool person to be related to though, however distant. Pretty sure I’m a distant relative of Alexander Graham Bell on my dad’s side

And SURPRISE, you survived!

​@@theAmazingJunkmanim related to napoleon.

@@ChrisFerguson-zm4gt which side of your family

Who? AIG? They're blatant liars. They put their lies right there in their video titles for everyone to see, knowing that sheep are so deliberately ignorant that you won't even see the lies, because you don't know the difference between an "evolutionist" and a "cosmologist', and you understand so little about the actual scientific method that you will believe a scientist would "panic" at the mention of new information. Science is BUILT around the idea that we will always continue learning new things, making new discoveries, and tossing aside old assumptions to make room for new evidence. Then, when they post their videos with smug lies right there in the title, they giggle when sheep like you post things like "We love you guys!"

Distant galaxies are not measured by parallax. They use supernovae of known brightness.

@@jockyoung4491 Aw don't spoil his "Gotcha" moment.

exactly. its all the same; big bang evolution abiogenesis. questions to which science has no definitive answers. just hand waving.

@@peterbreis5407 We've never been past 8 miles into the earth but yet they can tell you all about space and the planets around us. Mmmmmm I doubt they know as much as they try to convince us that they think they know.

@@Qwazier3 That post reveals everything about _you._ Why don't you go and find out? Reading and learning is not a sin.

"Why isn't this video about the latest information from the Webb telescope" Because JWST demonstrate on daily basis an old universe

Nah, your strengths and knowledge are just found in other things!

At least you are very honest 😊

Well, you just need to start with honest scientists instead of people that lie for their fairytale Bible

@@--..-...-..-.--.... lol ok. You keep telling yourself that.

well you are in good company then with these 2 nitwits!

Absolutely nothing. It's another AIG clickbait title.

if you like the idea of god and you also like the idea of atheist bashing you could probably blame atheists for potatoes having worms. AIG is a pack of liars basically, what can one expect.

@@OgdenCrimmcramer8162 I'm only here to watch people like you get triggered. You're so easily enraged by the scientific concept of competing theories. Why do you hate science so much?

@@stevedoetsch "GAWDDIDT!!" isn't a competing scientific theory.

@@stevedoetsch Because they're not competing theories. That would require at least one of them to possess some form of legitimacy, and since AIG can't even label their videos without unveiling their ignorance, I'll let you guess which theory that is.

Who is panicking? Certainly not any scientists. Science is all about learning new things.

I scientists are open and in search of the truth. if they weren't you wouldn't have things like youtube to post silly comments on.

@@jockyoung4491 The science community have their narrative of how they(those who control this world) want things to be interpreted. Anything like God and Jesus being in the explanation has to be debunked because those in the shadows that control this world want as many souls to be lost as possible. There is a war going and your soul is the prize. You best choose Jesus while you can.

According to who, ppl that never bothered to ask someone what their precise thoughts were, so they decided to lie about them others? I don't think you and others with your opinion understand how much most of us would prefer a simple explanation, with simple determinate rules for convenience sake.

Has it occurred to you that many scientists are devoutly religious?

"But please, cease with the hyperbole saying it's causing evolutionists to PANIC (in ALL CAPS, no less!). There's no need for sensationalism. " But it is necessary, every day the JWST demonstrate an old universe

@@Mario_Sky_521 It was JWST, not Hubble, and scientists are excited by the new information. The fact that the oldest galaxies were more mature than we expected just means that we now have real data to use for impriving the models. That is ALWAYS a good thing.

@@Mario_Sky_521 i don't see any problems that affect atheism, they affect science, but science is always being puzzled and challenged, but this is really a christians problem cos on the one hand MOST christians believe evolution to be true and the minority don't - so your "personal" and "revelatory" god is lying to one or the other bunch isn't he. leave me out of it, go argue with other christians.

@@Mario_Sky_521 getting your science information from a religist propaganda channel like this one does absolutely NOTHING for your credibility, and "having a mural on your kitchen wall" is not quite a PhD is it?

@@Mario_Sky_521 and no two galaxies will be the same, that's just twaddle.

Note that the matter seen BEHIND the quasars are part of the local galaxy group... with less red shifting than the quasars in front of them.

What’s the understanding of this?

@@steveOCalley Generally it is utterly ignored by the establishment... or claimed to be "an illusion", even though there are multiple sets of observed galaxies with sets of "attached quasars" (two quasars opposite of each other with the galaxy between, each attached to the galaxy by an apparent bridge of stars and gas flowing out from the galaxy in question). Interestingly, some of these galaxies have several similarly paired newer galaxies spaced out along the same axis that the quasars are following, as if these newer galaxy pairs were once very fast quasars that slowed down over time after ejection from the parent galaxy and became galaxies. If that is so then the quasars are likewise ejected from the galaxies, becoming galaxies as they slow down, reducing their redshift values. Note that the quasars have redshift values that when added together cancel each other out, leaving the redshift of the parent galaxy.

lol, twaddle. i love how janitors can pretend to be theoretical physicists on youtube.

@@HarryNicNicholas Hmm so you are a janitor. Me, I am a retired degreed chemist.

Not necessarily though, since the speed of light is not a constant. And has been slowing down consistently, meaning as you go backwards it was faster, possibly along with the expansion. Our observations today would therefore be based on an entirely different timescale.

For some reason creationists always lump the origin of the first living things into evolution

@@Woopor Also the Big Bang too

Cosmic evolution. Cosmic evolution is a requirement for biological evolution.

@@markhastings9037How’s that possible because something was created out of nothing and then suddenly the universe was created by design intelligently created. If our sun was just little closer we’d cook further we’d freeze ! God even tells us in scripture that his universe continues to expand and would keep on expanding.

Yeah, they talk about cosmic evolution and biological evolution like that because that forms it all into a nice little, ' continuous' story, a creation story, just like they have. It's just projection, of course.

Awesome profile picture

No, they're not planning to move the goalposts; they're planning to further investigate and correct their models accordingly. That's how Science works. Meanwhile, you'll just keep on believing whatever your holy book tells you to, without trying to understand new evidence.

@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 "Moving goalposts" accusation is projection on the creationists' part, since creationism does it all the time.

@@bradfordreed6175 I’m not projecting, I freely admit my mind is made up. Nothing could change it because I lack the trust in the scientific community to even take them at their word. So no I’m not projecting.

Christians were at the forefront of creating modern scientific method. To learn and understand is the path to wisdom. Wisdom was God's first creation.

New data come in that conflicts with current understanding. Science - Well this is exciting, lets update our models and understanding. Religion - Deny deny, Do mental gymnastics, obfuscate, twist what bible says to try make fit, tap dance, try to discredit science to make our silly belief appear less silly.

Watch and maybe find out

​@@kehindeakiode2865can you not explain it?

Not a thing. Creationists just like to throw stuff at the wall to see what sticks.

@@kehindeakiode2865 I'd love to hear YOUR explanation, since evolution has nothing to do with cosmology. No matter what they discover about the hubble constant, it has no impact on evolution, and we'll just keep on evolving.

@user-on3wh6wu9n The video discussion was almost entirely about cosmology, not evolution, and Dr. Faulkner clarified that this was naturalistic perspective, not evolutionary. But what does the Hubble tension have to do with evolution? Directly, nothing. Indirectly, it implies that the age of the universe can be very different than expected. Change the age of the universe, you could also be changing the age of the earth and what the expectations of evolutionary progression are supposed to be. At its core, the Hubble tension demonstrates that bb cosmology is flatly wrong. We already knew that for other reasons such as the barion problem, the horizon problem, the faint young sun paradox, and other solid reasons. It also demonstrates that the 13.8B years assigned to bb cosmology is wrong. Either the age is wrong, or the time to form galaxies is wrong, or both. If all of these things happen too quickly then the earth and universe can be very young relative to bb cosmology. The subtle implication here is that there is no objective way to measure time in the universe if the expansion rate doesn't match the bb ideology. That's because the universe may be way too big, so using speed of light to calculate time would make very distant stars and galaxies way too old to be able to see them in a mature state.

"The void of nothingness can't go bang" True; air does not yet exist. Hence no "bang".

Yep. Nothing x nobody = everything? It doesn't even pass the logic test.

"conversation of energy" That would be something to listen to.

Nowhere in the bible is the age of the earth given. AiG interpret a young earth that is impossible to reconcile with modern evidence of how our universe operates. The bible can still very much be true, but not with such a short timespand.

God is timeless..Genesis was the beginning of mankind consciousness

This has been proven out many years ago, the entire understanding of evolutionist and even carbon dating are way off. If you seek you can find but it’s buried. Find the documentary “the genesis theory”

Please remove your post, you are just confusing all the YEC'ers out here, smile

There is no understanding of "the evolution of the universe" as nothing has ever evolved.

Yes, there may be _"gaps"._ But there may also be a gaping chasm of missing foundation.

@@KenJackson_US «But there may also be a gaping chasm of missing foundation.» the gaps are due the technology. more are precise tecnology more accurate the data

Yes, creation would be difficult to explain from a human perspective.

@@eeveecat2158 let me guess , «creation« would be difficult to explain from a human perspective unless you believe bible is true? gotcha!

No , because objects all around are moving away from each other in all directions , if they were orbiting a centre , we would see groups of objects moving together in one direction

Verse 1 is a general statement: "in the beginning God created the heavens and the Earth", and the following verses go on to explain the order in which things were created.

According to the following verses: 1. When did God create the earth? 2. When did God create the heavens?

Apologists can twist themselves in as many knots as necessary to try and make their bible fit reality - and when one knot doesn't work, they'll twist themselves into another, and another and another. Who cares? Science works best by ignoring all this nonsense, and will continue to do so.

I thought the issue was science pushing religious concepts.

@@automateTec It's the opposite. We have religious people doing religion, but pretending it's science so they can wedge it into the public schools.

With the evolutionist losing the Big Bang theory they have no probable replacement to put forth their billions of years theory of evolution. No billions of year and evolution theory can’t exist.

​@michelledavis-classicalg-cp8byWhy waste time and troll here?

Well said

​@@johnnycanread9978She's doing God's work.

@michelledavis-classicalg-cp8byyou are a disgrace and you can’t deny the fact, you believe in the fairytale of big bang 😂😂😂theory

@michelledavis-classicalg-cp8by The guy in the video just totally disproved the big bang, Darwinism, and evolution in less than 20mins. What more could you ask for?

So in order to keep your faith you're going to be misinformed on multiple scientific topics....

You lack of *Faith* and your insistence on having reasons (a call for evidence) means you're on the path back to sanity and rationality. Keep going! Gods clearly do not exist. It is obvious from the fact that of the thousands of gods that litter the pages of history - we know they were all made up by our ancestors. And we need to recognise that the gods which remain today are no different, and ultimately destined for the same fate. It's time to embrace and get comfortable with the fact that there are many things we do not know. This actually spurs us to try and find answers - actually answers - not the made-up nonsense of religions.

Praying for you 🙏 Jesus is the creator and He loves you. Keep trusting in Him. God bless

@@michaelcooper8924 You do realise that is just a fairy tale?!

The interviewee said the JWST confirmed the Hubble ... see Live Science March 2024: Depending on where we look, the universe is expanding at different rates. Now, scientists using the James Webb and Hubble space telescopes have confirmed that the observation is not down to a measurement error. In other words it is down to the theory being wrong.

In the secular worldview it is the origin of the ingredients for life. Usually I see it referenced with regards to origin of life. Also, if there was no millions of years then there hasn't been enough time for evolution to happen.

@@tonyabrown7796 While these three fields are interconnected in the broader context of understanding the origins and development of the universe and life, they are distinct areas of scientific inquiry, each with their own set of theories, evidence, and research methodologies.

@@tonyabrown7796 Since the Earth is over 4 billion years old, that doesn't seem to be a problem.

@@jockyoung4491 I disagree. There are plenty of astrological phenomena that limit the age of the universe. For example comets, some of which are estimated to have a maximum age of just a few thousand years old. That's one of the reasons cosmology is important. If the age of the universe is less than that, so too is the earth.

@@tonyabrown7796 Comets and other astronomical objects do not provide reliable evidence for a young universe - their lifetimes are simply not long enough to contradict the well-established cosmological timescales.

Agree.. much over my head too... But at least by the 4th listen, he's talking about real things.. not the big bang without any evidence. Wish they would teach this stuff in high school.

And did you conclude he’s lying?

@davidgardner863 Lying? If u don't believe him, look at the reports yourself. If you don't look at the reports, then please don't pretend you know better than scientists.

@@HSTOgaming They will just say that creationists are not scientists. They always do.. 24/7.

@@HSTOgaming , Maybe he’s lying to himself but no legitimate astronomer would ever say the earth was made before the sun and stars or the universe is 6000 years old and he knows it.

No, Arp didn't show anything. His hypothesis didn't stand up to scrutiny, and we understand that the Doppler shift and redshift are two sides of the same coin. We can thus redshift to estimate large distances. This is what happens when you believe that the universe is only 6,000 years: you have to deny the entirety of scientific knowledge so that you can continue believing in the myths invented by ancient people.

Perhaps ARP did not proved anything but challenged other astronomers regarding redshift. His ideas just did not accrue much fact since 1970, and have dwindled, not from nefarious reasons but the quiet demise of theories that cannot sustain themselves.

No facts proving a BIG BANG or EVOLUTION exist..

"Expansion measured at two different rates doesn't sound a lot like steetching out the firmaments like a tent to me. " Perhaps there are two gods, pulling in different directions ^^

If that's why you think they do this, you don't understand anything.

@brianfisk1 huh? Why do they do what? And, What do I not understand?

@@KubenPlays I'll write slow... they don't do this work to win prizes.

cos red shift is about how the universe is expanding, red shifted stars and galaxies are moving away from us, the deeper the red, the faster they move. blue shift is stars / galaxies moving toward us, there are fewer of these as that would be actual movement rather than expansion of the universe - red shifted galaxies are not (necessarily) moving, they are part of the expansion. the illustration is dots on a balloon, as you blow it up the dots stay where they are, but as the balloon expands they appear to move further apart when they are not actually moving, it's the balloon expanding.

" Thank you for the information. I have a question; We hear a lot about the "red shift" but little or nothing about the "blue shift" why is that. " The absolutely wast majority of objects in universe is moving away, but there are some few objects that move towards us (or we move towards them), then there is a blue shift. The reason why the redshift is interesting is related to the past of universe and future on a grandest scale

JESAJA 45:12_14 ...My own hands STRETCHED out the heavens...

​@@edk484stretched, not stretching, expansion is still happening.

@@edk484 That is the whole and complete answer. There never was a Big Bang. Stretched means that He stretched out the heavens, and STOPPED the stretching. The universe is STATIC, no expansion. The redshift is not due to expansion.

how do you explain how it shows everything moving away from US? How doe you explain the cosmic background radiation being oriented to earth's rotation disc? its like we are the center of the universe... or more likely, we ARE the universe.

@@Pow_FIsh The universe is apparently expanding based on the notion that the redshift is a doppler effect. But since the universe is pack full of Zero Point Energy particles, the light must pass this particles to reach us, thus lenghtening the wavelength. Redshift is not a doppler effect. Specially since the redshift is quantified.

Read the articles on their website. They address that, as well.

Is type 1a supernova mentioned in the bible ?

Ignore the COLOR and look for specific emission spectra. It is the lines in the spectrum that shift. A specific element can only glow at specific wavelengths because of quantum physics. Of course, if that means nothing, then so does the explanation.

You must be a Dordt or Kings or Calvin graduate-you’re quoting Abraham Kuyper (out of context) to denigrate the exact opposite position of Kuyper🤔🤣 Read the history of science and we see the oscillation of catastrophism and uniformitarianism-the latter which is recently in vogu. Stand outside of yourself, remove yourself from the highly enlightenment-rugged-individualist worldview permeating our culture-stop thinking you’re smarter than you are

Faith comes by hearing and hearing by the word of God. We use the historical- grammatical method to interpret the Scriptures. We don't take what the Bible claims and make it fit with the ever changing secular science of the day. Jesus said " If you don't believe Moses writings, how will you believe my words." A lot of modern science is seeking to get purely naturalistic explanations for our origins.. the only problem is our existence has a supernatural causation. In the beginning God..

Well said!

no the Bible is right. The young-flat earthers are right.

​@@WilliamHudson-ug7wz Pretending something is true doesn't make it true. At least be honest.

It's helpful if you want to remain or attempt to keep others as ignorant on science as possible.

You should do your own research instead of blindly believing what apologists tell you to.

in what way? MOST christians are fine with evolution, it really means that god is not telling someone the facts.

An actual engineer would know that light in optical fibre attentuates, which causes a slight shift towards red.

@@richardgregory3684 I suppose an actual cosmologist would know light attenuates in space through various particles...

"fiber optic engineers know that light shifts to the red" Oh? I use fiber optics and have never heard of such a thing. "Opposite shift occurs at the falling edge of the pulse, leading to a transient optical frequency decrease (red shift). The chirped signal propagating in a standard fiber at 1550 nm is broadened since blue shifted component has a higher group velocity than red shifted component." Blue shifted component? If you are using a laser, there is only one wavelength going in, and that exact same wavelength coming out. But if you are inserting multiple wavelengths into a fiber, well then of course different wavelengths have differing velocities. This is not a doppler shift.

"...this would not be possible." What kind of puny god do you serve? I'm not a cosmologist, so these guys certainly have an explanation that trumps mine. But if God can create ex nihilo, He can easily plop a planet in Sol's Goldilocks zone. I believe God created Earth first because we are the theological center of the universe. The old church confused geography with theology.

If we look at Genesis 1:14 that pretty much gives you your answer. The sun was to give seasons which didn't happen before it was created. The Earth could've existed without the sun and started to rotate around it once it was created to give the seasons. Before that there was darkness over the Earth with only God providing the light (or at least that's the theory)

It appears that the only answer is, and always is, that an all-powerful God can do anything.

@@HoldmeJesus8 The bible describes a flat earth, with a firmament above it, and the sun, moon, and starts in this firmament, all at the same distance above the flat earth, with water above that. It's pure nonsense, of course, but one thing not possible in the biblical description is an earth orbiting the sun.

I support you. First the Universe (13.8 billion years old) Then the elements (Formed very soon after Big Bang) Next, the sun (4.6 billion years old) Afterwards, the earth (4.5 billion years old) Then the moon (Very soon after the earth) Then, life (3.8 billion years old) Finally, humans (Specie is 150,000 years old)

Nice analogy with the soccer pitch. I don’t expect there’ll be any attempt at a response on their part.

Expansion rate and age of the universe aren’t the same thing, you conflated the two. All they are saying is the rate cannot be both 72 and 67 km/s/Mpc the difference is statistically significant (not close). The newer lower measurement was done assuming the Evolutionist Big Bang theory was fact and using it as a basis for their calculations. The video simply states that erroneous presumptions/foundations lead to wrong conclusions/results.

@@m0x910 The age of the universe is calculated through the expansion rate. No, it can't be both 72 and 67 km/s/Mps, but the closeness of the measurements lend credence to there being a measuring inaccuracy rather than the 2 being different. If the measurements were say 500 and 10 km/s/Mps, then yes, you could safely demonstrate that the 2 are different measurements. But they're not. They're already within 5 km/s/Mpc, and new papers are being published right now that demonstrates they're less than 2 km/s/Mps apart and continuing to shrink in discrepancy. We're getting better at measuring and the 2 values are converging. This again demonstrates that the 2 are indeed the same, we're just not getting the most accurate measurements.

@@m0x910 Also, no. The newer measurements were not done with any assumptions in mind. They're direct measurements. AIG admits that in this video. They say both measurements were done with direct observations, and those direct measurements are converging more and more as we improve measuring techniques. Why are you using the word "evolution"? Evolution has nothing to do with cosmology.

@@msquiggle3590 And it will all be recognised as useless and meaningless once the theory of the Big Bang has been demonstrated to be false. The evidence is already mounting against it.

Thanks to the weakness of your mind, you have been fooled into believing in things that don't exist....like your gods. If faith is all you have to go on, then conceivably, you could be convinced to believe in any other load of nonsense that's not true as well.

@@gladishilton1943 *1 corinthians 22,23,24* For Jews demand signs and Greeks seek wisdom, but we preach Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles, but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ kthe power of God and the wisdom of God. Our faith is not a blind one, we have faith in Jesus who is the greatest witness of God's existence. How about I am praying this day for your soul, and God will make you His servant and witness of Him? 😂 Yeah, God is incredibly wise, great, powerful, authorized, controlling His creations, I mean everything. 😜 You will see what I am talking about now. 😊

@@moveitstime If your Faith is not "a blind one", then you must have observed the evidence that verifiably confirm your silly god exists. Care to share this verifiable evidence? I expect you will not. Why? Because if you could then you wouldn't still be talking about having Faith, you would be talking about having Knowledge. And knowledge is something we can share and importantly verify for each other. You're sad to look at.

@@gladishilton1943 You are thinking that believers won't be having knowledge, dude, Sir Isaac Newton was a Christian believer and invented great things in science, and he never denied Christ. You think we will be reading the Bible and do nothing. 😄 We see everything through the Bible, and that's why we can see the truth and you are blindfolded by your own pride denying God. Sooner or later, God will make you His servant working for His gospel which you can't outrun 😂

@@moveitstime I simply point out that people like you - even by your own words - have FAITH....which is NOT knowledge. Newton may have believed in God but he had no KNOWLEDGE of God.....which is strangely odd because you can't seem to have knowledge about anything that doesn't exist. Furthermore, Newton's belief in his god didn't help him inventing a new branch of mathematics or discover the relationship describing mass and gravitational attraction - all this was derived from observation, data analysis, and the application of reason and logic.....NOTHING TO DO WITH FAITH. And given the BIBLE is so full of errors, lies, and other nonsense, "seeing everything through the Bible" is about as silly as using a fairy tale book to guide you through life. You religious types are nowadays really dragging down our species.

Why 6000?

@@slickrick6544 why not, when everything is imaginary you can make up any bollocks you want, these guys do on a daily basis. and i fail to see what it has to do with atheists too, as MOST religions ans religists are fine with evolution - get some christians on the show and debate them.

@@HarryNicNicholas I'm confused, I asked why the number 6000, you replied Why not the number 6000

​@@slickrick6544IT has to do with a day being a thousand years to God.. How many days did it take God to create everything? God rested on the 7th day. Most Christians couldn't find their butts with both hands when it comes to actually knowing what God's Word actually says... In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth PERIOD.. It doesn't say when..

@@billb3673 They take the Bible to literal at times. But I mean nobody actually knows the age of the Earth or anything for that matter, Because after a 100 years you get a pretty bad dating system🤷‍♂️

probably not a good idea. AIG is just a propaganda religist channel, they don't care about facts, their sole purpose is to sell books that lie to their audience.

i much prefer the uncertainty of science over the "certainty'' of mythology/religion. over time knowledge is gained and understanding increases. mythology is dead and frozen.

Sure. Science for the win. I was referring to a specific point being made.

"we can't be certain about the expansion rate of the universe." There is no WE. Some people are certain.

Anything is possible with an all powerful creator who can mak things come to be as He sees fit. And that's what Genesis chapter one shows. The Big bang idea doesn't explain the origin of matter itself, or give meaning to anything. It was something fallen men came up with in a futile attempt not to deal with their creator, because they don't want to be beholden to an all powerful God.

@@reidveryan9414 Ironic then that the Big Bang as a theory was proposed by a Catholic priest.

@@reidveryan9414 you said it, imaginary people can do anything. you lot just make up any crap that suits your purpose. i don't mind though cos the stats show that all this BS people like AIG spout is easily checked and most of it is pure lies - people are not signing up to the bigots and liars club anymore - pew polls and gallup - the churches are empty cos of stupidity like this channel. MOST christians are believe evolution is true.

@@reidveryan9414 And The Bible doesn’t explain the origin of god

Evolutions foundation begins at the big bang (cosmology).

The evolution model definitely does not begin with the Big Bang model. This video is beyond silly. In summary, there is a discrepancy (67 vs. 73) in the Hubble constant, therefore there BB model is in trouble. But there is no YEC model and we need the next generation of pseudoscientists to solve it. Dumb

Yes it does

@@Cherokee9898 Cosmic evolution and Biological evolution are completely unrelated theories. Neither implies ANYTHING about the other.

Gravitational lock?

@steveOCalley It's my theory. It can only be proven with math under the hypothesis that with the universe being curved at extreme distances, time changes according to the curvature of space. Ever wonder why lightspeed has a set value(universe gravitational lock) and the set values of actions. The curving of space appears to slow down light (time dilation).

@steveOCalley knowing the speed and angle of an object and the speed of the viewing location is needed for the time change in viewing the distances and time in which light is perceived. The reasoning is that light does not move in a straight line.

@@steveOCalley time doesn't move in straight line either.

@@golfnb28but why is it curved? All we know is that curvature depends on the momentum-energy tensor. You know more?

The Bible is a flat earth book from cover to cover, if you believe in space AT ALL you're pushing a satanic psyop.

God stretching the heavens isn't the big bang. It means what it says. He stretched out the heavens. That doesn't add billions of years to God's word.

well it's not even an atheist problem, MOST christians believe evolution is true and there are plenty of christian astronomers who can square things, so why atheists are being pestered with what amounts to god telling two differing and conflicting stories beats me, not my problem, ask god.

@@HarryNicNicholas or perhaps those Christians who believe evolution have simply been brainwashed and don't know any better yet. We can be assured that if we follow God's word, evolution and the Big bang will not be a part of our thinking

It seems that you don't understand what he was saying. That was like reading a less educated Deepak Chopra talk about how the sun has feelings. Since you clearly aren't aware general relativity requires that the speed of light be constant in all directions for a specific frame of reference.

@@Gek1177 General relativity is what I’m talking about.

@@JungleJargon I know, that's how I know you embarrassed yourself.

@@Gek1177 You were talking about something other than what I was talking about.

@@JungleJargon nope, but I'm not surprised that the most basic concept of general relativity has confused you. It's what happens when a goof uses pseudoscientific gobbledygook to justify their silly beliefs. That's why I said you remind me of Deepak Chopra.

So, how will _you_ do when you face your Creator upon your Earthly demise? If He judges you just by the 10 commandments alone, how will you do? Heaven or Hell? I hope you'll be quite smart regarding your eternity. God allows you to choose Him, or reject Him, with consequences for either choice. Jesus died to pay the penalty of your sin, as is true for all people. If you seek God's forgiveness through the Savior, Jesus Christ, He will grant you eternal life. Peace, love and blessings.

@@LV4EVRHow will you do if you face any of the thousands of other gods after your demise?

@@billyb7465 You believe in thousands of God's?

@@LV4EVR The point Billy's making is that you really have no basis to just ask anyone about post-death shenanigans for just your own religion besides your own biases. But with that out of the way, you _really_ should stop with Pascal's Wager. That's a child's argument and should be left in the kindergarten sandbox where it belongs.

I think LV4EVR is assuming a recognision of the biblical God- Yahweh- Creator, heavenly Father, etc. A big chunk of the Old Testament particularly, describes God showing the people that other "gods" were not real, that only He is real and dependable, and teaching the people that only He is to be trusted, unchangable, keeping His promises and has a plan for their good. All the prophecies there, including all the ones about the promised Saviour ( except some of the end times ones) have been fulfilled - remember in the Christmas story, the scribes knew where he would be born, and on Psalm Sunday, thanks to Daniel, the people knew to expect his arrival in Jerusalem. I am not trying to convince you. Only the Holy Spirit can convict. Jesus himself said that even if a man came back from the dead it wouldn't change the minds of those who want to go their own way, without God. However, there is the witness of nature itself, the witness of over 500 to the resurrection ( this written when many of them were still alive and could have been challenged - see book of Acts) and the personal experience of Yahweh, by millions of christians over 2000 yrs to the reality of God's Spirit love and power through the promised Messiah, Yeshua.

13.77 billion years.

@@Mario_Sky_521 I gave you one yesterday when you asked the same question. You didn't bother to answer.

Not everyone is interested in gayitude and marxistery and mongolian knitting.

@@CJFCarlsson Yeah, he never quite managed to top Repeat Offender.

Very much of what are said to be facts are incredibly inconsistent which coincides with the likes of a liar alone. Such as the excessive amounts of varying earth history years stead of tv shows and books since the advent of the tv. And don’t get me started on the advent of the tv and the lies it has perpetuated since its dawn.

Every holy text known to man was written by man. Prove me wrong

@@swiftmatic captain obvious.

Science is also faith based.

I am more inclined to listen to these guys than the guys who say the universe created itself. Just that statement alone exposes a complete lack of logical thinking. If that is their starting point I have no hope for their end point and the steps along the way.

Never heard of one that was. Why would they start being honest now?

Let brainwashed idiots tell you instead? Learn science. Religion is a dead end. If a god exists, mathematics and science are its laws, tools and language. Not bronze age mythology reborn in the silicon age. No gods exist.

Go with that and look up Riemannian space. Good question if you expand it.

He would probably disclose his personal interpretation, not teach as fact the student has to recite

The universe is only thousands of years old. The assumption the speed of light determines the age of the cosmos is ridiculous.

@@EnthusiasticTent-xt8fh What do you mean? Are you being sarcastic?

@maxpolaris99 I mean God created the cosmos.

@@EnthusiasticTent-xt8fh well, then publish your work! I don't understand you people always complaining about science and what aspects of science you disagree with, but you aren't even scientists and don't even understand the subjects you think you are arguing against. If you possess data or evidence that scientists are unaware of, yeah, you really should publish.

yes, cos most of the lies they tell people can be checked and it makes more atheists. and it's not even an atheist problem, MOST christians believe evolution is true and there are plenty of christian astronomers who can square things, so why atheists are being pestered with what amounts to god telling two differing and conflicting stories beats me, not my problem, ask god.

Sorry, but the problem is that the heart doesn't think. If you use your brain, then clearly gods do not exist.

both evolution and cosmology are made-up subjects based entirely on fiction, nether reveal anything true.

@@Pow_FIsh As usual, you can offer nothing better than a senseless slogan. I don't mind you disagreeing with me, but I would get a more thoughtful reponse from a parrot. Your reply does not even correspond to the three principal points I raise, to whit : 1) why does the title attack evolutionary science when the video is about cosmology ? 2) Why do AiG find so much perverse pleasure in the idea that they have caused people to panic, or that they have "destroyed" something ? 3) Even if a scientific theory could be shown beyond doubt to be wrong, why is the only alternative explanation "God" ?

@@user-ex4wx1rj7s my comment got deleted, yours didn't. That means I'm right and you're fake.

@@Pow_FIsh If your comment got deleted, how did I manage to reply to it ? And if you mean you made another comment that was deleted... maybe God's decided to switch sides.

All creation is evolution as nothing comes instantly ,evolution and history are just the results not the causes of events .Replicating it is all but impossible as lack of knowledge guards Garden of Eden's entrances .

​@@rovidius2006 nothing comes instantly? Sure if God doesn't exist. But if he does what makes you think he can't make something instantly?

@@ReiseLukas There is no mention of it in the bible ,it is only our perception ,time is also mention around every major creation mark , science and religion should not travel alone .

@@rovidius2006 And God said "Let there be light",and there was light There's nothing in the passages of Creation to indicate the things God was doing was any significant length of time aside from "and there was evening and there was morning the first day" for all six days. It's made very clear every created was created within literal days. I

@@ReiseLukas Yes days ,no literal anywhere ,it took time for every one thing to happen .He rested for one day ,no telling of how tired he was ,it is only mentioned for a reason .