No video

Why this Screw Drive is Really Weird

  Рет қаралды 565,010

James Bruton

James Bruton

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 1 100
@jamesbruton
@jamesbruton 3 жыл бұрын
openDog is back doing some mapping with ROS next week, Patrons and KZfaq Channel Members have it already!
@zoombahh
@zoombahh 3 жыл бұрын
TL/DR: put some vertical bars inside the tube to prevent balls from rolling back down, archimedes screw only works because its tilted and cant just flow down the screw like the balls. you're relying on the friction between the cylinder and balls, which is fine for grain or cereal that dont flow down the spiral. but with smooth atomic units like these balls a vertical bar or "cleat" in the tube would greatly increase the flowrate by preventing the balls from rolling back down. thats what i thought you were getting to with the vertical bars at 0:17 , but it never came in the whole video. please flip the red bits inside so they fill the gap between the tube ID and screw OD and youre golden.
@Bibibosh
@Bibibosh 3 жыл бұрын
Put numbers on the balls
@joparsons20
@joparsons20 3 жыл бұрын
So this is basically how the dough ball roller at little Caesars works.....
@gonzostwin1
@gonzostwin1 3 жыл бұрын
Make the chute go back into the bowl and it will self feed
@purboyy
@purboyy 3 жыл бұрын
Lazy susan
@travisknee3027
@travisknee3027 3 жыл бұрын
It's 100% going to work, it's called an olds elevator thank you Tom Scott!
@ShamWerks
@ShamWerks 3 жыл бұрын
10:11
@isi_ko404
@isi_ko404 3 жыл бұрын
Yes, das that Video to
@RiverMersey
@RiverMersey 3 жыл бұрын
Patent expired: patents.google.com/patent/US7314131B2/en
@jesterblackguarde8464
@jesterblackguarde8464 3 жыл бұрын
They also usually have a stationary "wiper" in the sump, to increase efficiency.
@njorsing
@njorsing 3 жыл бұрын
@@RiverMersey adjusted expiration to 2024
@andreyrumming6842
@andreyrumming6842 3 жыл бұрын
I remember seeing a grain farmer using this same method. If you didn't know, grain when it's powdered or freefloating is SUPER explosive and flammable. Turns out this design prevents air from building up in the screw, not only making the flammability problem go away, but also making the screw more efficient overall (Because the entire screw is filled with grain). There are pros and cons to the design, but it's interesting to do experiments like this and see what happens :) Edit: Just watched more of the video. That Tom scott one is the EXACT one I was talking about!
@SCU3A_S7EVE
@SCU3A_S7EVE 3 жыл бұрын
Dutch taught me this while we was rescuing Javier from them fellers in Guarma. Dutch always has a plan.
@christaphersimmons2216
@christaphersimmons2216 3 жыл бұрын
I lived in a town of 350 in dead nowhere Iowa I watched first hand the concrete shoot blocks away when the olds broke and the grain bin went critical
@JKTCGMV13
@JKTCGMV13 3 жыл бұрын
I was thinking of that same video while watching this one
@Redact63Lluks
@Redact63Lluks 3 жыл бұрын
The tube turning is useful but the bottom feed turning is the most critical feature
@HDfoodie
@HDfoodie 3 жыл бұрын
Right. In fact, nothing would have to turn at all if we could somehow ensure that balls were continuously being fed in at the bottom. We just created a Giant plastic Ball Screw!!!
@stalkinghawk9244
@stalkinghawk9244 3 жыл бұрын
Are you sure?. hm, here most definitely however just shoving in grain for example with a cylinder might just result in crushing. I think that the friction with the side walls becomes very important the finer the particles are.
@HDfoodie
@HDfoodie 3 жыл бұрын
@@stalkinghawk9244 It could be easily tested by continuously feeding the balls at the bottom without the tube turning. The difference between this build and the Olds Elevator is the tolerances between the screw and the outer tube. In this design, there is only enough space for a single column of balls, therefore they don't require the outer tube to turn, just enough pressure from underneath to be pushed up the screw. Using smaller balls would be a better approximation. Maybe marbles?
@stalkinghawk9244
@stalkinghawk9244 3 жыл бұрын
@@HDfoodie hm also should test powder of sorts, since it has massive friction problem around corners. like pushing powder through a pipe with a bend at worst it compacts itself.
@chrismofer
@chrismofer 3 жыл бұрын
yeah it would be far more effective and not need the pressure of the scoops on the bottom if the tube had ribs running up it that prevented the ball from rolling down. then it'd be like 1:1 rotation to ball movement, instead of spinning the tube much faster than the balls and hoping that some friction here and there shimmies them upward.
@tzisorey
@tzisorey 3 жыл бұрын
"If you think you know, put your comment below" +1 to the list of viewers who've seen Tom Scott's episode. ;)
@serbianspaceforce6873
@serbianspaceforce6873 3 жыл бұрын
where my tom squad at
@gracielaw382
@gracielaw382 3 жыл бұрын
@@serbianspaceforce6873 Earth
@Braddles1802
@Braddles1802 3 жыл бұрын
If I had a dollar for every time James says "lazy susan"
@jaredhelder
@jaredhelder 3 жыл бұрын
$10. You would be rich!!
@ArtSurvivesArtist
@ArtSurvivesArtist 3 жыл бұрын
He reminds me of that 5th, dorky member of the Beatles who got left out. Maybe he could voice Thomas the Dorky Tank Engine.
@calvinbedell
@calvinbedell 3 жыл бұрын
you would have $10
@ghostnike901
@ghostnike901 3 жыл бұрын
Some where in the world, there's a woman named Susan watching this video who is very upset
@OrangeC7
@OrangeC7 3 жыл бұрын
@@ghostnike901 Either that or she's having a good laugh
@richardoglesby2997
@richardoglesby2997 3 жыл бұрын
Totally should design the top part to feed back into the hopper and have yourself a good piece of kinetic art like a water fountain type thing
@tjriggs4696
@tjriggs4696 2 жыл бұрын
Dude! I was just gonna comment the same thing!
@D-S-9
@D-S-9 3 жыл бұрын
I'd seen the other video so I guess I'd cheated by knowing the answer? Very cool demonstration, and if you had the top chute eject back into the basin then you could leave it running continuously at a show or something.
@jamesbruton
@jamesbruton 3 жыл бұрын
The balls will go onto the next stays, coming up in a couple of weeks...
@Bean-Time
@Bean-Time 3 жыл бұрын
Why does your name have a thing
@desk-kun
@desk-kun 3 жыл бұрын
@@Bean-Time he's a channel member
@tormodhag6824
@tormodhag6824 3 жыл бұрын
I got to ask because the archimedes screw always confused me. I always wondered why doesnt the marbles roll down the spiral or the water flow down? If Im not completely wrong or stupid, dont they have to be at an angle?
@Lotharyx
@Lotharyx 3 жыл бұрын
That’s actually a great fluid dynamics demonstration! Notice how the elevator loses efficiency as the “fluid” (the bulk ping-pong balls) around the inlet starts to move along with the scooper. James uses his hands as baffles, but fixed baffles inside the sump would improve the efficiency by a great deal.
@Silverwing2112
@Silverwing2112 3 жыл бұрын
It does, Tom Scott did a video about it.
@ShamWerks
@ShamWerks 3 жыл бұрын
9:54
@botonduller
@botonduller 3 жыл бұрын
Maybe you should've watched the entire video before commenting...
@patrickgardner2204
@patrickgardner2204 3 жыл бұрын
@@botonduller he did say to comment below.
@beefy256
@beefy256 3 жыл бұрын
"What we need is more balls" Heh.
@gonzalogutierrez510
@gonzalogutierrez510 3 жыл бұрын
Heh
@kameronstogner9874
@kameronstogner9874 3 жыл бұрын
Heh
@ajme_
@ajme_ 3 жыл бұрын
Heh
@beefy256
@beefy256 3 жыл бұрын
@Nathan Ho 😥
@79bald
@79bald 3 жыл бұрын
Can’t believe no one said “That’s what said”
@karyjas1
@karyjas1 3 жыл бұрын
Now imagine the screw turns too, but in opposite direction. Wouldnt that be even faster?
@peitz.design
@peitz.design 3 жыл бұрын
yes
@holyravioli5795
@holyravioli5795 3 жыл бұрын
Would that not just cancel out?
@peitz.design
@peitz.design 3 жыл бұрын
@@holyravioli5795 Only if the screw is turning in the same direction. The important thing is the relative speed between the screw and the casing. The bigger the difference the faster the outcome
@ZNotFound
@ZNotFound 3 жыл бұрын
Stop him. He's too powerful.
@renrutmat
@renrutmat 3 жыл бұрын
The important point is the minimal damage to the items being transported. If the screw moves there is more damage to the items. This was first proposed by a Mr Olds to minimise damage to grains. Turning the screw as well may increase speed but may increase damage to the items being transferred.
@martindalby3941
@martindalby3941 3 жыл бұрын
Yes it does work, saw on Tom Scott's channel.
@Johnny5Toy
@Johnny5Toy 3 жыл бұрын
Came here to say the same
@beans1327
@beans1327 3 жыл бұрын
Just waiting for hasbro or fishersprice to steal this
@postualin6551
@postualin6551 3 жыл бұрын
This gives me a feling that You Have a new project in mind.
@RubixB0y
@RubixB0y 3 жыл бұрын
Why just a feeling... he tells you that he's building a "great ball contraption" out of 3d printed parts instead of Lego.
@dragon3x560
@dragon3x560 3 жыл бұрын
me in the beginning : What no of course not Me at the end: sir, it seems you've used DECEPTION
@danielbender4327
@danielbender4327 3 жыл бұрын
suggestion for a follow-up: the same screw and tube, but the “obvious” way with the screw turning instead. What would you have to do differently to get the balls to lifr at the same rate.
@gfloyd2002
@gfloyd2002 3 жыл бұрын
I would love to see the upper chute feed the balls back into the hopper at the bottom, making a self-feeding machine once you get it started.
@jdhannan
@jdhannan 3 жыл бұрын
No it's much better to direct the balls away and then put them back in by hand 😂
@alexstone691
@alexstone691 3 жыл бұрын
I havne't seen anyone 3d print stuff so professionally looking and with such volume
@icingdeath
@icingdeath 3 жыл бұрын
I liked how you narrated and built it as if winging it as you go without a plan, and everything admirably just fitting and ending up working together. Literally build as you go. Well done!
@mentalmelt
@mentalmelt 3 жыл бұрын
Guess you like being deceived ;)
@shadowcard6923
@shadowcard6923 3 жыл бұрын
It works with enough friction with the medium being transported or it’ll be highly inefficient. Edit: The sump added later in the video acts as the screw in this case, with less screw threads so to speak, which uses the other balls as the delivery
@TheAstronomyDude
@TheAstronomyDude 3 жыл бұрын
It's fascinating that in the thousands of years since Archimedes it took an Australian in 2009 to figure out you can spin the cylinder.
@niallmorland
@niallmorland 3 жыл бұрын
He's English...
@haack90
@haack90 3 жыл бұрын
@@niallmorland The Olds Elevator inventor, not James Bruton.
@niallmorland
@niallmorland 3 жыл бұрын
@@haack90 ohh my bad dude it's been a long day
@yannickurbach5654
@yannickurbach5654 3 жыл бұрын
Well you can't in an Archimedes' screw. A proper Archimedes' screw works with gravity rather than friction, so you'd have to spin the gravity field.
@Gottenhimfella
@Gottenhimfella 3 жыл бұрын
@@yannickurbach5654 Indeed. The beginning of the video misrepresents what an Archimedes' screw is, and how it works. It is NOT fitted in a tube, and it has to lie tilted, at more than the helix angle of the thread, or the water will flow downhill and out the bottom. In this (vertical) case with balls, the balls would roll downhill in the absence of a tube.
@swamihuman9395
@swamihuman9395 3 жыл бұрын
Great stuff. Was hilarious seeing your test apparatus keep getting more and more involved! :D Zero resale value, though :D Keep up the awesome content. Looking forward to seeing your 'great ball contraption'...
@isthissiddh
@isthissiddh 3 жыл бұрын
just add a thin vertical extrusion on the internal circumference of the tube and it will push the balls physically, preventing them from rolling back down
@JeroenBouwens
@JeroenBouwens 3 жыл бұрын
My thought exactly. Without extrusions like you propose it's impossible to empty the sump, as the balls only rise up due to back pressure from new balls being pushed into the tube, which only works with very light balls like those ping-pong balls, but not with heavier ones such as golf-balls.
@cheeto4493
@cheeto4493 3 жыл бұрын
I came looking the comments to see if any other had mentioned it.
@kal9001
@kal9001 3 жыл бұрын
@@cheeto4493 I just said it myself in a reply to someone. I'm amazed how far I needed to scroll to find it, and I'm amazed James didn't do this already. Seems SO obvious, and it was even shown in the CAD model. We're either being played with, or James got tunnel vision on this and couldn't see it.
@sawyerklegr
@sawyerklegr 3 жыл бұрын
Was thinking the whole time that it is quite similar to a lego GBC, when you showed it at the end I was so happy! 😂 You will definitely enjoy making it, I personally build lego GBC modules and it is so enjoyable to try to solve the challenges involved with creating them.
@avejst
@avejst 3 жыл бұрын
Great project, just for the new year. Thanks for sharing you experience in this time🎆👍😀
@zfxpedals
@zfxpedals 3 жыл бұрын
Dear KZfaq, Why did you recommend this video for me? I'm fascinated and grateful for the recommendation
@melcrose
@melcrose 3 жыл бұрын
3d Fuel ROCKS. The pla-pro is insanely good.
@oddjobbobb
@oddjobbobb 3 жыл бұрын
You might have let the “catcher” at the top feed the balls into the reservoir and it would go and go and go and...
@verargertesspielen4629
@verargertesspielen4629 3 жыл бұрын
Reminds me of the german based rollercoaster "Euro Mir" with its special lifthill. Nice to Ride!
@littlepastelkitten
@littlepastelkitten 3 жыл бұрын
I love 3d printing because you can just make cool and random stuff like this
@CooperDuper3000
@CooperDuper3000 3 жыл бұрын
*pff* look at this guy... his videos are amazing! Thank you james bruton for making these educational, inspiring and fascinating videos! ❤👍
@Forcemaster2000
@Forcemaster2000 3 жыл бұрын
You should have had your "output" at the top feeding back into the tray at the bottom, that way you wouldn't have had to keep refilling it yourself!
@bairnonessie
@bairnonessie 3 жыл бұрын
Olds Elevator, made in what is now a museum(I believe) in the city I live in.
@majorjohnson8001
@majorjohnson8001 3 жыл бұрын
I'd forgotten I'd seen the Tom Scott video but my initial reaction was "well if the screw turns and it works, then yeah, turning the housing instead would also work. Because which one's moving is relative."
@RichardGray353
@RichardGray353 3 жыл бұрын
I'm pretty sure my grandma gave me a toy when I was a kid that did something similar to this. I remember being a little fascinated that the screw didn't move.
@AlRoderick
@AlRoderick 3 жыл бұрын
While it doesn't seem like it, this was invented so recently that Mr Olds still holds a patent, so if anybody's thinking of incorporating a mechanism like this into anything you sell watch out. With either this style or a conventional screw conveyor, when it's perfectly vertical it's hard to deal with free rolling material like ping pong balls or ball bearings, ideally you want something that would sit still if you placed it on a ramp the same angle as your screw. it's the introduction of new material under pressure at the bottom that's pushing everything up, the screw just supports the weight of the material already on its way up the tube, because otherwise you'd have to work against the weight of the entire column of material to keep those scoops moving.
@NinoJoel
@NinoJoel 3 жыл бұрын
How the hell is he holding a patent to somthing that is literaly over 2000 years old ?
@daanlutkewillink3893
@daanlutkewillink3893 3 жыл бұрын
@@NinoJoel Because the original invention had the screw turning instead of the tube around it. It's really weird that nobody thought of it earlier, but yeah. lol
@EvileDik
@EvileDik 3 жыл бұрын
@@daanlutkewillink3893 I question its patent-ability (unless Olds has some special non Archemedian feature) , all 4 designs* have been in use for millennia in the middle east, outer tube rotating is popular as it's easier to attach motive force(aka donkey)to the outer cylinder than the inner screw. But the US will patent/copyright anything that isn't bolted down. *Moving screw, moving cylinder, counter rotating cylinder screw, and co-rotating cylinder screw. I went and read the patent application, and the Olds elevator is a very specific variant, with particular reference to vertical orientation, a sweeper arm and specific clearance between screw and tube. The patent itself quotes prior art patents going back to at least 1988. It is not a patent for the concept of a motive tube with a stationary screw.
@robo1540
@robo1540 3 жыл бұрын
im gonna say itll work just because everything functions relatively to each other and who cares if its the tube rotating or the screw
@ABRBD
@ABRBD 3 жыл бұрын
For a school project in grade 4??? 5??? I made an Archimedes screw with PVC pipes and some tubing to make the screw part, and it actually worked. I'm pretty sure I got an A+
@tenchuu007
@tenchuu007 3 жыл бұрын
*stares hungrily in hippo
@drsmegs
@drsmegs 3 жыл бұрын
Your gonna get much better results if you tilt the screw and tube even just a little.
@AndrewBlack343
@AndrewBlack343 3 жыл бұрын
You do with the original Archimedes screw design (where the screw turns) I don't see an advantage of doing so when you rotate the cylinder.
@sprocket2cog
@sprocket2cog 3 жыл бұрын
Wintergarten " I'm building a musical marble machine " James "hold my beer"
@abyss9447
@abyss9447 3 жыл бұрын
youtube subtitles: [applause] the video: balls moving up the screw
@nattsurfaren
@nattsurfaren 3 жыл бұрын
7:48 This is probably how an ice cream maker work. When it starts to harden only then it gets pushed up. Please make an ice cream maker video James :)
@w0lf-m4n
@w0lf-m4n 3 жыл бұрын
Whel yes it's simple physics turning the screw or tube is ultimately the same thing in perspective of the thing tour trying to lift up.
@buggsy5
@buggsy5 3 жыл бұрын
Similar, but not identical. For example: When the screw turns, the balls resting on the screw have momentum due to the screw rotation. When the tube turns, the balls in the base have momentum from the rotation. Another example: When the screw turns, the friction between the balls and screw resist the movement of the balls upwards, while the friction between the balls and the tube aid the movement. When the tube turns, the opposite is true. In both cases, the balls entering the base have to contain enough kinetic energy to overcome any momentum fighting against the balls being moved upward. You can see what happens when a new ball is not trying to enter the cylinder - the balls start to roll/slide down the screw under the force of gravity. The physics is simple, but calculating the magnitudes of the forces involved (even as a general equation) is much more complex. Note that the balls can only go so high, before balls can no longer be forced into the tube.
@medlimakar
@medlimakar 3 жыл бұрын
The LEGO Great Ball Contraption community has been using a similar mekanism for just shy of ten years; it has a stationary screw on the outside and a rotating column with vertical bars on it on the inside. It's known as a 'Spiral Lift module'.
@iopfarmer
@iopfarmer 3 жыл бұрын
The contact angle between the screw flank and the balls (relatively to the pipe surface) is important. I think it would raise the effectiveness if the tangent at the contact point tend to line up with the pipe axis (30° for example, instead of 70° here?). this way will the driving force at the contact point be higher.
@iPrint3D
@iPrint3D 3 жыл бұрын
Love the "simpler" videos James!
@wscamel226
@wscamel226 2 ай бұрын
My answer to question at the begining: Definitely yes, it turns really fast.
@jordanabendroth6458
@jordanabendroth6458 3 жыл бұрын
I've seen the Tom Scott video on this so I'm going to go with yes
@Micksoffthings
@Micksoffthings 3 жыл бұрын
I leave this under every video I watched, it helps the algorithm.
@bowieinc
@bowieinc 3 жыл бұрын
My favorite. Please do more like these.
@aidenbagshaw5573
@aidenbagshaw5573 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so so so so so so so so so so so so so so much for being one of the few people to realize that an STL on it's own isn't that useful.
@RussellNelson
@RussellNelson 3 жыл бұрын
Wow, you have some balls to do that!
@nitor5398
@nitor5398 3 жыл бұрын
Depends your tolerances and what you're moving on if it would work or not
@PalmettoMoon
@PalmettoMoon 3 жыл бұрын
This gives new meaning to, No screwing around.
@AndrewDeLong
@AndrewDeLong 3 жыл бұрын
I never knew that it would be possible for one to screw around with ones balls and be so productive about it.
@GeorgeBobeck
@GeorgeBobeck 3 жыл бұрын
This is a crude version of an Olds Elevator
@rdoes6696
@rdoes6696 3 жыл бұрын
Ball contraption plus engineering lessons. I like it!
@MrTacoSr
@MrTacoSr 3 жыл бұрын
“Will rotating the tube make it work?” rotating screw compressors: “Am I a joke to you?”
@GoldKnightProduction
@GoldKnightProduction 3 жыл бұрын
So the thing stopping this design from being extra efficient is that there's no groove on the tube for the balls to slot into. If the balls could only slide vertically upwards along the track, then the screw would provide the upwards force as it spun.
@WakarimasenKa
@WakarimasenKa 3 жыл бұрын
Aah thanks for finishing the video with the Tom Scott clip.. I had paused the video to search for it since I remembered seeing some video about it.. But I thought it was Smarter Every Day talking about grain bins.. But nope.
@redactedbananas
@redactedbananas 3 жыл бұрын
It would be cool if there was a larger tube on the outside, so they all fall back down and start over. And then use a way more ping pong balls.
@faytaliti
@faytaliti 3 жыл бұрын
Well, looking at it from the ball's perspective, all that would matter is the relative motion between the screw and the tube wall, so it's going to work just fine regardless of which one is moving from our reference frame.
@williamheckman4597
@williamheckman4597 3 жыл бұрын
You could have probably figured this out with a simulation or with basic math, but your construction efforts are quite impressive.
@TheHengeProphet
@TheHengeProphet 3 жыл бұрын
Well, this is half a screw drive and half an impeller drive. A significant part of the motive force is provided by the pressure caused by the impeller at the bottom drawing material into the screw. The screw provides a low-angle path which reduces gravitational influence on the material. The material is also aided by the wall to move around the screw. A pretty neat design in all.
@bashkillszombies
@bashkillszombies 3 жыл бұрын
"There's quite a few advantages," inserts main problem with silos. Yet is still not used in silos. :P I'm guessing the cost is prohibitive, and people prefer to risk the explosions. ;)
@shykitten55
@shykitten55 3 жыл бұрын
I'm not a rocket scientist, but here's my theory: The balls are spun and gain energy. They are moved IN and so as with the conservation of angular (something) they will move faster. Repeat as the next one comes in behind. Also, friction from the outside all and the ball will make the ball move "forward" and thus up. Oh, and I love your toys behind you.
@FifthConcerto
@FifthConcerto 3 жыл бұрын
It should take some effort to get the first ball in, and I don't know if one ball could easily make it up the screw. However, once the tube is seeded, turning the tube knocks the balls around in a way that simultaneously has them pushing against each other, pushing against the wall of the screw and the wall of the tube, and the floor of the screw. This means the balls will be pushed to roll between the screw wall and the tube wall, and the incline of the floor will cause this rolling to be uphill. This will be helped by the balls pushing from behind, or at least helping to prevent backsliding once a critical mass of balls within the tube is obtained. In short, relative to the frame of reference of the balls, it should be essentially identical for the screw to turn, or for the tube to turn because the same forces are exerted on the balls in either case.
@sgavy
@sgavy 3 жыл бұрын
You should put stripes on the screw to show its stationary, might puzzle some onlooker's who dont immediately see the tube spinning.
@markhorstmeier8734
@markhorstmeier8734 3 жыл бұрын
I would love to see you take some of the mechanisms from "507 mechanical movements" and 3D print them. There are several accounts that have animated the CAD but it would be great to see them in action. I would pay to have those especially if they were parametric or scalable
@salec7592
@salec7592 3 жыл бұрын
Now I am wondering if this could be made flexible, similarly to flexible shafts in sleeves, making "active pipelines" to transport small grain materials and fluids. Also, what if the design was reversed, so that inner core was smooth and cylindrical, and the spiral ridge (path) was attached to outer wall? For my former idea, that would mean using almost every part of existing flexible shafts, replacing only the sleeve and adding side ports for transported material at endpoints.
@eththe
@eththe 3 жыл бұрын
me: reads title also me: its the tube around it
@snagh
@snagh 3 жыл бұрын
You surely have balls for that design
@douglasmaclean5836
@douglasmaclean5836 3 жыл бұрын
awesome video James !
@superjimnz
@superjimnz 3 жыл бұрын
The scoops are the key addition, as they force the material into the system. The friction with the sidewall does also help, but it's mostly about the scoops.
@NomaddUK
@NomaddUK 3 жыл бұрын
James, what a load of balls mate!
@ws6002
@ws6002 3 жыл бұрын
It could work, but a couple of factors are can have a significant negative effect. 1) Obviously, nothing is going to happen unless the spin of the outer tube causes the ping pong balls to spin. Let's call the rotation of the tube (s1) and the induced spin that of a given ping ping ball (s2). The ratio c1 = s2/s1 is going to be between 0 and 1. 2) If the ping pong balls are induced to spin, and there is no slip between the balls and the ramp, the balls will climb up the ramp. But there is going to be slip between the two, so the efficiency c2 is again going to be somewhere between 0 and 1.
@crawkn
@crawkn 6 ай бұрын
I was surprised that the "Olds Elevator" works, but since it seems to rely to some degree on friction, I can't imagine it is very energy efficient. You could elevate grain by any number of inefficient means, but I'm not sure why you wouldn't choose a more efficient one.
@WistrelChianti
@WistrelChianti 3 жыл бұрын
Great to hear more engineering concept stuff on the way. My most recent project has been on trying to get as many different actuators going off a single motor. Been a really fun design challenge just to get the motion down. Still going on the design though to turn it into something that is actually printable/assemblable
@Rob_65
@Rob_65 3 жыл бұрын
I think that if there are no more balls in the reservoir, the "pump" will stop pumping. I also think this does not count as an Archimedes screw. But this is a very nice feature for something like a marble machine that uses ping-pong balls. In an Archimedes screw pump, the medium is pumped up due to the fact that is is trapped in a small pocket where the medium cannot flow back down again because the screw is angled. This system uses a combination of balls being pushed up because of the force of the balls entering the scoops combined with a bit of friction from the tube on the balls. This only works while the balls are light enough and have enough friction. This will not work with tennis balls or glass marbles.
@marcanthonykami5473
@marcanthonykami5473 3 жыл бұрын
All these years on and you still have the trusty old Taz 3d printer 👍 keep up the great work buddy 👌
@nottelling6598
@nottelling6598 3 жыл бұрын
The only reason I knew this before the video is because it's a surprisingly recent innovation in moving grain around without causing explosions. It's also great because driving the outside is mechanically more simple than driving the shaft. Just put some gear-teeth on it.
@VoprotheGamer
@VoprotheGamer 3 жыл бұрын
Begining video: I think it can work if the walls are pressed up enough to touch the balls. End video: I knew it would work.
@avada0
@avada0 Жыл бұрын
Well, the catcher part at the bottom pushes the balls in and the balls push each other up. So the usefulness is limited it wouldn't work with water, or grains. Also I'm not sure if it counts as an Archimedes screw, which is always at an angle and carries water/grains up in pockets. (Water just flows away, and the grains friction would be too much beyond some point) It's a helix on which balls are pushed up.
@TurkishKS
@TurkishKS 3 жыл бұрын
Really nice build. Since it's demonstrative, a clear catch and channel/tube that returns the balls to the feed would've been a nice touch, saving you the hassle of reloading.
@SmokyFrosty
@SmokyFrosty 3 жыл бұрын
James meets GBC? I thought Christmas came only once a year!
@gagreflex9404
@gagreflex9404 3 жыл бұрын
you should 3D print a final slide so the ping pong balls drop back into the base - for fun make it look like a helter skelter :)
@patrickwinterbourne8516
@patrickwinterbourne8516 3 жыл бұрын
Awesome project
@stens7820
@stens7820 3 жыл бұрын
This behaviour is well known. Many applications already exists - elicoidal pump to pump up water (just replace the small balls with water) -continuous flow turbocharged engines (ex Mercedes Kompressor)
@Shadow_Architect
@Shadow_Architect 3 жыл бұрын
I’ve seen something like this made in LEGO ball contraptions where they would go up the screw being pushing by sticks
@MrAtalon
@MrAtalon 3 жыл бұрын
As an individual piece you could just attach a slide to the top catcher to feed the bottom but if it is going to be part of a larger system than that works to. Can't wait to see what you come up with.
@jonathanfoss7825
@jonathanfoss7825 2 жыл бұрын
I think it'd be neat to have a desk toy of a miniaturized version of this that fed the balls back into the resevoir.
@toxicgamer2835
@toxicgamer2835 3 жыл бұрын
For the final slide part I would have made it to where it loops back around to the bucket with the balls and make it like a infinite loop
@XxCauzhavokxX
@XxCauzhavokxX 3 жыл бұрын
It’s like an automated paintball hopper.
@semegraph
@semegraph Жыл бұрын
Some vertical stripes on the yellow screw would make the illusion far more effective.
@spaghettisama
@spaghettisama 3 жыл бұрын
Had a feeling this type of screw was already in use in either farming or tunnel digging, looking at other comments it turns out my guess was correct! Slight confidence boost: gotten.
@FlyingAroundOz
@FlyingAroundOz 3 жыл бұрын
With the ball feed in scoop and the weight of the ball supply, you don't even need the screw in the tube. A simple tube fed from the scoops would do the same thing if it had a sloping entrance to reduce the entry resistance.
@Alphoric
@Alphoric 3 жыл бұрын
Couldn’t you make the ping pong balls fall back into the area feeding the balls like an endless loop kinda thing
@WernerBeroux
@WernerBeroux 3 жыл бұрын
13:30 It works because they spin isn't explaining anything. The reason they spin (relative to the screw) is because of mostly 3 forces: 1. The opening at the bottom which are inclined and especially with the pressure if all the balls in the basket, actually strongly push all the other balls up. If instead you had a flat opening, the whole thing wouldn't work. 2. Friction of balls against acrylic cylinder, helping a lot to makes them spin 3. Pressure equilibrium: It'd work with water as well and there it's easier to understand that you'd get the balls in the basket and in the tube to be at the same level (supposing there are no frictions or you just make the whole thing shape to achieve the same) Note that the Archimedes' screw that you referenced in the beginning only works because it's inclined. This mean that due to gravity even stopping it would keep most of the water in the tube. It'd only work vertically with a LOT more speed. This is important because turning an inclined tube isn't the same here. In you turn the tube of an Archimedes screw, without turning the gravity vector (Earth), then you only have the friction of the cylinder. Supposing a perfect screw and cylinder, it would actually not work anymore.
Experimental Jamming 'Beanbag' Robot Gripper
15:54
James Bruton
Рет қаралды 237 М.
Archimedes: More than Just a Screw
12:19
Sideprojects
Рет қаралды 196 М.
Чёрная ДЫРА 🕳️ | WICSUR #shorts
00:49
Бискас
Рет қаралды 4,6 МЛН
ISSEI & yellow girl 💛
00:33
ISSEI / いっせい
Рет қаралды 21 МЛН
Fortunately, Ultraman protects me  #shorts #ultraman #ultramantiga #liveaction
00:10
Tightrope Walking Cheat Device
14:22
James Bruton
Рет қаралды 1,5 МЛН
Jet Powered air engine
14:48
James Bruton
Рет қаралды 181 М.
How far can I Ride on a Cardboard Bike?
21:57
James Bruton
Рет қаралды 175 М.
I found a use for the Mobius Strip Tank
16:35
James Bruton
Рет қаралды 314 М.
Experimental Drone Positioning System
17:36
James Bruton
Рет қаралды 207 М.
High precision speed reducer using rope
20:19
Aaed Musa
Рет қаралды 1,5 МЛН
Why there's more to Tensegrity than 'Impossible Tables'
13:23
James Bruton
Рет қаралды 134 М.
Mechanically Stable Monowheel
13:06
James Bruton
Рет қаралды 307 М.
Mobius Strip Tank
13:55
James Bruton
Рет қаралды 517 М.
ROCKET that LITERALLY BURNS WATER as FUEL
19:00
Integza
Рет қаралды 2,4 МЛН
Чёрная ДЫРА 🕳️ | WICSUR #shorts
00:49
Бискас
Рет қаралды 4,6 МЛН