Oh man, the engineers are going to have a field day with his explanation of analog/digital
@JoshTurnerGuitar4 жыл бұрын
Souma Mondal lol you beat me to it. This is a handful.
@snoolee79504 жыл бұрын
@@sammacdonald8240 yes it is called Shitty Common Trite Song 101
@PeteS_19944 жыл бұрын
Musician vs engineer though.
@sonicjackalopeproductions33423 жыл бұрын
Yeah... while the mario block description is good, he kind of described the role of transducers very wrong. As someone who teaches engineering, I kind of wish they hired educators for these videos who can describe it correctly
@51MontyPython3 жыл бұрын
@@sonicjackalopeproductions3342 What did he get wrong, exactly?
@nex4 жыл бұрын
> "Analog is smooth" … "nothing is ever going to be as smooth as the original" That's a bad explanation. Those stair-step-shaped graphs are just a common visual metaphor for representing digital signals; they do not faithfully illustrate what you'll really hear. When you compare the output of an analog synth/mixer/filter to the output of the digital equivalent on an oscilloscope (analog or ditial; doesn't matter), the waveforms look *exactly the same*. When you push different implementations of the same concept *beyond* the limits where they can manage to be equivalent, you're going to hear some differences. For a example, digital clipping sounds very different from analog clipping. Depending on what you're trying to do, one effect may be way more desirable than the other. Intuitively, you can distinguish between 'natural' vs. 'artificial', 'warm' vs. 'harsh', etc., and creatively exploit these effects in musical ways. But don't get fooled into making conclusions about what's physically possible with one type of signal vs. the other. In practice, it's more about what's economically feasible. For example, neither type of signal can reproduce the platonic ideal of a square wave, with perfect right angles, because they both have a limited band-width. Obviously, no real speaker or headphone membrane will ever follow such a tracectory accurately, magically teleporting from one amplitude to the other in zero time. Because, again, the bandwidth is limited. And that's no problem at all, because the bandwidth of human hearing is also limited. The idea of thinking of a digital signal as a series of "snapshots" is spot-on; really good metaphor. But such a signal still carries exactly the same information as the analog equivalent. By the time you actually hear it (through an adequate DAC), it makes no difference. Construing analog signals to be 'smoother' is a complete misconception; totally beside the point. Sure, when you work with real-world gear you can actually afford, you notice some trends: Analog tends to cause less latency. Digital tends to introduce less noise. If you don't find it entirely necessary to study signal-processing maths until you understand exactly why that is the case, you're pretty much right. Just understand this: If you believe that analog performs somehow better by some vague 'smoothness' metric, you're dangerously close to being convinced that master volume knobs ought to be made of organic wood and that mixing consoles sound best when powered by gluten-free electricity.
@Ramdas_Devadiga4 жыл бұрын
XD
4 жыл бұрын
Diga lá, Tino "Sentiu"...
@djsjdh-hoahdi4 жыл бұрын
Geez this man had a family lmao
@MusicianParadise4 жыл бұрын
when you refer to gluten-free electricity it's AC or DC? Im confused...my wooden faders does not sound right to me....
@tomvice4 жыл бұрын
Tracking is an analog process, because voice is analog. It's like using a camera lens vs and iphone filter. The way in needs to be processed analog to be of quality After preamp, comp, eq hits the converters, sure plugins are exactly the same Mixing in the box with plugins is perfectly fine Recording(tracking) quality needs quality outboard stuff. Just like expensive cameras with big lenses and big sensors. Do iphones take good pictures sure. Do you see pros using them for commercial shoots?
@MakeSomething4 жыл бұрын
Mixing with your ears and not with your eyes really hit me. Very well said.
@DJABEATS4 жыл бұрын
Make Something that’s what’s up
@FrightboxRecording4 жыл бұрын
I remind myself of this on a daily basis.
@RoomAtTheTopStudio4 жыл бұрын
When anyone complains about the mini screen on an old sampler I always think this same statement but I don't usually say it as people who are used to mixing with their eyes won't understand.
@originellername30624 жыл бұрын
well thats actually bs as you can always just close your fucking eyes and turn the knob on your midi controller. Defenitely not worth the price and that hardware mixers are going to break at some point
@homestudios51964 жыл бұрын
It's really tough to watch a video about audio when the audio quality in the video is really bad. Love reverb, but what happened here?
@ICACJ4 жыл бұрын
I would crack a joke about recording his voice through his outboard gear, but I genuinely think it sounds like artifacts from a noise reduction plugin. These artifacts are what x-noise or z-noise sound like when they're trying too hard.
@homestudios51964 жыл бұрын
@@ICACJ Yeah, That's what I hear too, but why would there be so much need for noise reduction in a control room? I'M SO CONFUSED!
@ICACJ4 жыл бұрын
@@homestudios5196 Maybe the outboard chain has an EMI or RFI problem. There. I cracked my joke anyway.
@ToneSherpa4 жыл бұрын
@@homestudios5196 Most likely they were just plugging a lapel mic into the camera's sound jack or something. Probably was low on batteries, or had some kind of buzz from a short in one of the cables or something, and they just didn't realize till editing.
@SocialGore4 жыл бұрын
"analog warmth"
@Bone19964 жыл бұрын
"If you're on a budget..." "$550" I'll just keep living with my couple cheap pedals and Tascam US-1x2 I guess. Helpful explanations though in regards to how analog is captured and converted to digital.
@rm2kmidi4 жыл бұрын
This. As if $550 is just throwaway money.
@midnightsocean26893 жыл бұрын
Aside from the slightly distracting background music, this video is ace. You just can't replicate everything analog gear does, purely inside the box. Start from the mic and work your way along the stream. I always recommend this approach and it's nice to see that train of thought reinforced here. Really, the only thing that never stops sucking about analog gear, is the price. Even cheap stuff isn't really cheap but hey, you want that magic, I guess you gota save up for it. Makes you respect the struggle and gear a lot more, that's for sure.
@jaykay58114 жыл бұрын
People ask how I get my vocals so clear. It’s no question because I use a small mixer with a built in compressor. Get the gain just right eq out the boom on the bottom and all the extra useless highs then compress it and as long as u have a decent filter even in a home studio setup in a big room it’ll sound close to booth quality
@ChristopherSmithNYC2 жыл бұрын
What gear are you using?
@IronChefBoyardee4 жыл бұрын
All credit to Xiph, but to regurgitate his point: In a band-limited signal like digital audio, the "stairsteps" aren't part of the final result. These get filtered out by an anti-aliasing filter and the resulting wave, once converted back to analog, is a hundred percent identical (save frequencies above Nyquist, which are inaudible, anyway). The stairstep is a helpful visual aide, but does not tell the whole story. To say digital will never have the same fidelity is purely false.
@IronChefBoyardee4 жыл бұрын
That being said, all the other points, ESPECIALLY regarding latency, are spot-on.
@MichaelCosta_4 жыл бұрын
@@IronChefBoyardee You're absolutely right. Despite the generally good advice here, the understanding of digital is highly flawed. The analog wave will get reproduced exactly right up to Nyquist. Also, the discussions about not being able to push digital is quite dated. We have many plugins now that saturate in a very non-linear and pleasing way. The workflow is different to traditional analog but if you're using a work surface or controller, you can get the tactile response as well as the instal recall.
@InRegardsToMetal4 жыл бұрын
The Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem undermines the premise of this video
@ToneSherpa4 жыл бұрын
Care to explain which ones? Genuinely curious.
@Horstronic4 жыл бұрын
@@ToneSherpa you can perfectly reconstruct a signal if the sample rate is twice the max frequency. That's why the sample rate of digital audio is around 44 kHz (that max frequency humans can perceive is around 22kHz)
@ToneSherpa4 жыл бұрын
@@Horstronic Oh so it's just imperceptible. I guess theoretically he was right, but practically you can't hear the difference.
@michaelmore4 жыл бұрын
@@ToneSherpa At 44100 Hz sampling rate, for sounds under 22000 Hz, there's literally no difference. Above 22000 Hz, there is a difference but it's not perceptible to humans. When recording for dogs, use double sampling rates!
@ColonelClusterFunk4 жыл бұрын
@@michaelmore Although ultrasound can impact the way you perceive audible sound... Think formant frequencies & such. It'll also affect the behavior of signal processors, although most people will never notice if your sampling rate is above 48kHz
@skyerobinson57564 жыл бұрын
the irony of this video
@Darksagan4 жыл бұрын
I m a audio engineer who goes around looking for beginner videos. Just so that I can complain because Im not really an audio engineer. KZfaq in a nutshell
@Claylikesnachos Жыл бұрын
I think you hit the nail right on the head about listening with your ears and not your eyes. I’ve been thinking about this idea a lot recently. Getting into recording and mixing can be extremely confusing with today’s new technology, but (for me at least) everything began making sense when I started to learn about analog gear.
@deanroddey2881 Жыл бұрын
Definitely the case. I have moved more and more towards a pure analog scheme. I use the DAW as a digital tape deck and that's it. If you stop looking at all the pretty pictures you will hear better. And it also encourages better 'song memory' because I'm not constantly looking at the DAW. I have to remember the song. And recording it as it should sound on the way in, it'll never sound better than that.
@stainedglassministries6692 Жыл бұрын
Very informative. Thank you
@tanukibrahma3 жыл бұрын
Great River and Distressor are among my faves for sure
@ericjtomsky3 жыл бұрын
I just recently got UAD solo and the pultec EQ emulation is so unbelievable... I still want that warm audio gear pultec eq now tho ahhhh
@gavinxolson4 жыл бұрын
My mans with the Antelope Orion 32! 👌
@lightafluident.99502 жыл бұрын
So many don't even mention the LL2A compressor limiter from Little Labs. That piece of kit is like 3 different compressors in one, and it also has mastering capabilities. I love mine. State of the art, and it gets the job done in a very transparent manner. Check it out if you ever have time. One love.
@Yokai.Wakukhan2 жыл бұрын
This guy right here, gets a golden star.
@lamachineamixer Жыл бұрын
It is a common misconception that digital sound is like little steps. When is it converted to analog, the sound wave is smooth and the number of sample/sec. is enough to reproduce it correctly. In a decent setup, you would not be able to tell the difference in a blind test... It is sad when people cut corners like that when it comes to explain the differences between analog and digital.
@gcvrsa4 жыл бұрын
Digital audio recording software still depends on getting the highest quality sound on the deck, and that means you really want to be using good compressors in your signal chain *before* your interface. Software cannot make up for it after the fact. The problem with this, of course, is that high quality hardware compressors are expensive and stereo units are less common, but absolutely necessary in some applications. Even with low-end units, a small project studio with 16 input channels is expensive to fit with 16 channels of hardware compression, but it's absolutely vital, especially in today's restricted dynamic range marketplace.
@originellername30624 жыл бұрын
that pretty much a lie as there are top level producers like boris brejcha which only use a daw
@FrankDoorhof4 жыл бұрын
For me it's feeling the music under my fingers instead of seeing it. I'm using a hybrid mixer (soundcraft 12mtk) I group all instruments in the daw and than send it through the eq and faders for final tweaking. Which is close to what's in the daw but it's always a bit different. Experimenting with guitars through a DI but up till now I prefer my cab with blackbacks and a ribbon plus at2035 mic. Maybe it's also between the ears. But let's be honest that's where art comes from. So if it makes your end result better... Why not. Doesn't matter what the reason is.
@jacobbrown16904 жыл бұрын
i love my 22mtk
@justamessenger863 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@djcj3 жыл бұрын
Really awesome video!!! So concise and informative!!!
@jameswallace59674 жыл бұрын
Really good video! I run a tube mic into a tube mic pre into a tube compressor into a tube Pultec. I run this into REAPER.
@51MontyPython3 жыл бұрын
Do you know if there are tube preamps that are designed like guitar tube amp preamps, for use with an amp VST?
@lightafluident.99502 жыл бұрын
My vocal chain consist of a WA12 MK2 black mic preamp from Warm Audio; I chain an LL2A compressor limiter from Little Labs behind that (In FET mode); then I run a channel of the Art Pro VLA 2 behind that (optical compressor), but I only incorporate the last compressor into the signal if I feel I need more warmth/depth in the signal. Nothing like tracking through hardware.
@hummarstraful3 жыл бұрын
I bought my first serious piece of hardware gear, an UA1176 compressor. Totally blew away any plugin compression I've ever heard. In fact, I realized how 2D all plugins are. The hardware is 3D and now I'm all about it. The future is hardware for me.
@IntheDAW4 жыл бұрын
Great video i agree with almost all of this except the explanation of what digital is ans does. If you send something thats been contertednto and from digital to a oscilloscope you will see 90 percent of the time it will look almost exactly the same. The blocks are just a way for us to understand and visually see what digital does. But between each point is where it overshoots and records the information between the blocks.
@RealHomeRecording4 жыл бұрын
Ahh yes the Xiph test! Classic video that all audio engineers should watch. As for the advice in this video I agree with the rest of it. If your tracks already sound great when it comes time to mix, a lot of time is saved. So no doubt about it if you are recording music day-in-and-day-out outboard gear makes a lot of sense.
@IntheDAW4 жыл бұрын
@@RealHomeRecording yes the classic video everyone needs to see. But i also gree with everything else. It's pretty much on the nose
@chaputmi Жыл бұрын
Great vid…..how do you feel about the combined pre-amp compressors?
@GregorysMode3 жыл бұрын
That was a brilliant video that answered 90% thanks man. You do such great to the point vids.
@niandralades36664 жыл бұрын
While I support the message of this video, the explanation of the technical difference between analog and digital is mathematically incorrect. There is no inherent reason why analog should always sound better (or smoother as you say it) and digital will never get there. The actual differences are very technical and rather complicated, however they are most often neglectable if they are dealt with in the right way. Just try out stuff and don't be too preconceived in your opinion whether it's analog or digital. There is great and horribel things on both sides. Saying that as a computer scientist and signal processing guy.
@bobgulian18584 жыл бұрын
Niandra Lades He did not say it sounds smoother. He said the wave was smoother and he’s right. Whether human beings can hear that smoothness is another point. But mathematically, since he neglected to mention Nyquist, he is mathematically correct.
@niandralades36664 жыл бұрын
@@bobgulian1858 There is no such thing as stairstep waveforms outside of incorrect plots. There is quantization error and there is aliasing, if and only if your equipment does not match with your desired signal. Otherwise digital can capture and reproduce analog in an ideal way, mathematically speaking (Engineers would probably disagree :D). That's what I comlain about, the plot that is shown and the "no matter how small you make those blocks, it will never be as smooth as the original curve". That's simply incorrect and it's a very common misunderstanding of digital audio, so I thought I should clear things up :)
@KeenApollo4 жыл бұрын
Niandra Lades outboard sounds better. You can put a real tube or transformer in a plugin. It just has depth with real gear I’ve done work with both and they both definitely can sound good but side by side when a signal is run through hardware idc what anyone says it’s sounds way better
@audiolego2 жыл бұрын
He's living the dream
@glennefx6704 жыл бұрын
I am going to build a mastering chain this year. Thinking about getting 2 Burl Audio B1D Mic Pre amps and an API 2500 Bus-compressor. Cant decide which EQ though, maybe the Tegeler Audio Manufaktur EQP-1. Man I'm gonna be broke, but its true, nothing comes close to analog harmonic distortion. Tried a lot of plugins, no chance.
@RC_Cola20204 жыл бұрын
So much good info in the video
@StevenClements Жыл бұрын
1:23 then digitized into your computer 2:16 but as you increase the resolution your digitization gets so close that you... yes you... will not be able to tell
@davidrevan13742 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your video, I agree totally. Plugins are 2D and "flat" feeling, Analog gears are 3D, warmer and more "in your face". The main reason is that the plugins are all BAD under 200 Hz, despite if there are excellent in the frequencies above. And people must think about Aliasing VS low frequencies, that's a real point. Analog gears is mandatory to sound Professionnal. Also, people neglect the mastering step: It is so important to reach a real Pro sound. Merge Analog and Plugins is possible of course!!!! No parish as long as it pleases the ears.
@nomoresl8388 Жыл бұрын
Hi, great video! I own the stereo version MP-2NV Great River. Since it doesnt have Line Inputs. How would you transfer tracks from your Daw (Basses, bus groups, synths, drum samples etc.) to the preamp using the line outs of my RME interface? Because the signal would be so hot to feed a preamp and the Impedance would also be a problem, right? What would be the best way to do it? I would like to give my software instruments a bit of depth and spice making them go through real circuits transformers. Thanks.
@jonashellborg83204 жыл бұрын
Analogue gear is expensive. And you can for sure get good sound in the box, you don’t have to have great analogue gear. Having said that, an outboard compressor during tracking of drums, vocals, bass or any other transient rich signals is amazing, it’s so much easier to immediately tackle those sounds and peaks before hitting the computer. It’s somehow more coherent sounding, almost like the compressor helped sum the signal in a nice way. But if you are happy in the box, spend your hard earned money on open back headphones for mixing, and a good microphone, probably $500-1000. That’s all you need to sound amazing. Those two things will make a huge difference.
@Beatsmith20054 жыл бұрын
This guy might make great sounding records, but he doesn't know how digital audio works (and has explained it incorrectly). The points themselves are valid! Certainly not one for the budget conscious though...
@ijaapy2 жыл бұрын
You make it sound like analog (magnetic tape)signals have infinite resolution, which is certainly not the case.
@zenscapeUKmedia4 жыл бұрын
Many op-amp based, capacitor and linear powered based analogue effect pedals such as distortions or tube screamers add a 45 degree phase shift due to their circuit design. Stack a couple of those and you have more latency than a good digital domain running at a modern fast clock rate. What about the latency in a big studio live room - a 40ft room adds a delay of 35.7 milliseconds. PA's always have time delay correction. Analogue is never instant - what about the distance between record and playback heads on a tape machine?
@nomad15172 жыл бұрын
For live performances, using a DAW makes you be a perfectionist, like you will try to make every edit perfect, which can suck away creativity. It makes you a programmer rather than a performer. I could be wrong.
@hockeytalk6084 Жыл бұрын
No you’re not wrong man. The biggest mixing breakthrough I ever had was using analog style plug-ins that limit my options from over analyzing things and mixing with my eyes. Not the same thing but definitely the same concept I’d say
@lairdey4 жыл бұрын
If we're talking about tracking, that's one thing. But with the advent of elite mixers like Tchad Blake, Andrew Scheps, and Michael Brauer mixing completely ITB, the analog vs. digital debate is just downright antiquated.
@AkshayAhlawat934 жыл бұрын
Word man, like seriously. There are so many industry professionals moving towards ITB. There are so many reasons to go for one or the other now, just do what you can afford (cough.. digital).
@hummarstraful3 жыл бұрын
He was talking about tracking.
@fluorophoremusic36792 жыл бұрын
The interesting blind spot for the individual in the video or others who mirror the same sentiments is that they qualify their argument for analog by saying digital can't recreate the analog signal perfectly...then, they go through all the trouble to track things analog, only to put it through the ADC interface for digital conversion anyway. If their original qualifier were true, the entire analog tracking process would be pointless because it would be lost to some degree since digital cannot fully capture it. It's logically fallacious.
@fishpotpete4 жыл бұрын
Wow, that's some expensive stuff. They need to do one of these with things that the average Joe or Jane can afford. I'll start by voting for the dbx 160A for my "high-end" compressor.
@brooklynboy10004 жыл бұрын
check out FMR Audio - their RNC (Real NIce Compressor) is great for home studios. When these came out everyone loved them.. Remember, companies like reverb.com want to see you high end gear. The Great River preamp he talked about is excellent - I have had one for over ten years and use it everyday on vocals, bass, and guitars... save up and buy one of these.
@originellername30624 жыл бұрын
it doesnt matter what you use what really matters is your creativity. some of the best producers only use a daw
@petshop72483 жыл бұрын
the audio from this video couldve used a de-esser. kinda hard to listen to.
@DAVIDGREGORYKERR4 жыл бұрын
Can you not take the FFT of a tube amp and the FFT of the input signal then multiply the two together then use the IFFT to recover the sound you are looking for
@dulla84694 жыл бұрын
i honestly thought analog was a waste of money, and that people who say analog is the best sound, but i didnt know shit, about mixing, i never tried analog mixing, but i started using some emulated analog plugins, and i found that the sound is different, i know its not the same, but it does change the sound from digital processing, and i found myself not making hard cuts and hard boosts on eq, or compressing heavily, and makng the vocals sound unnatural, mixing with ssl channel a pultec eq and analog compressors force me to listen to what im doing instead of looking at the plugin like an eq and boost more cause it doesnt LOOK RIGHT
@dreamdrifter4 жыл бұрын
Addressing point number 4 - it's true that it's better to mix with your ears than your eyes, but you should have mentioned what radical a difference it can make HOW the listener will hear the track - their phone speaker, in the car... Their bass boosted BT boombox? This is why having big, precisely tuned (expensive) monitors in a acoustically flat room (expensive) is the only realistic alternative to getting to know a much more accessible graphical EQ. Really I guess it comes down to knowing your monitors/headphones and their inherent imperfections, and how to compensate for that in the mix.
@richardweidner16253 жыл бұрын
great stuff, thx
@BLVCKHATmusic2 жыл бұрын
With the way this video explains the difference between digital and analog waveforms I am left very confused. Maybe I am missing something, but from what I'm gathering it wouldn't make any difference in sound if all the analog gear is eventually ran into an interface and becomes a digital file.
@RealHomeRecording2 жыл бұрын
Once an analog signal has been converted to digital, it loses its analog purity. Every round of digital to analog then analog to digital conversion after that lessens the signal's quality. If you have very nice converters like a Lynx Aurora (n), Burl Audio or Prism Sound then there won't be significant degradation. So, for the highest quality sound, it's best practice to process audio signals in the analog domain as much as you can afford to before that first round of conversion. More than anything, it saves time during mixing.
@itsmarkeis3 жыл бұрын
What are those monitors he has?
@Moflia24 жыл бұрын
How do you route this kind of stuff? I've tried to use outboard gear by sending signal from an out on my interface, to the unit (compressor, eq, etc.), and then from an out on the unit back into a line in on the interface. My results haven't been exactly good and I believe I might be routing this poorly.
@ToneSherpa4 жыл бұрын
Just curious, what specifically is wrong? Noise, Distortion? Low signal level?
@Moflia24 жыл бұрын
@@ToneSherpa The signal itself has no unwanted distortion and in fact sounds fairly good. It's just quiet and gives me some knarley feedback, and you can imagine the headache of trying to turn up the gain to get the signal louder only to increase the feedback with it.
@markpeters23172 жыл бұрын
hey. so while we're giving tips here... guys, you should consider recording better quality audio on a video discussing how to get the best quality audio. I can't take u seriously when I've heard Twitch streamers with better audio quality lmfaoo
@lightafluident.99502 жыл бұрын
Nothing like tracking through hardware.
@jyoshnalatrobe4 жыл бұрын
Hi Jay I am starting up a home studio, and want quality but not too expensive stuff . I have an ISA One for example so around that price range. I do alot of vocal and guitar work, so which Compressor, Eq and Reverb units would you recommend? Thanks Jay
@IosuamacaMhadaidh4 жыл бұрын
Steve Albini and Electrical Audio.... enough said LOL
@andrebrown46774 жыл бұрын
In terms of instrumental production, I dont play an instrument, so all my sounds are coming out of my DAW..will Mixing pre recorded audio with Hardware EQ,Compressors etc make much difference instead of doing all the mixing in the box..? Thanks in advance!
@sonicjackalopeproductions33423 жыл бұрын
It will sound "different" because you are rooting and affecting the signal differently. "Better"? Well, that is completely subjective. Analog gear at any point of the signal chain alters the signal by applying voltage at different rates and times within the signal's journey. Just, keep in mind that the signal will need to be re-sampled before going back into the DAW. This can be where problems occur. Like editing photos: If you take a high quality picture, do some physical manipulation to it and re-scan that photo, unless you have a super high end scanner, the image will be of lower quality than when it was generated by the computer in the first place. Now, all that said, you as an artist may LIKE and WANT that change in quality! It may add some cool factor thay you wouldn't be able to get just in the box. Or, you may hate it. But, again, that is subjective. The best thing to do is simply try it and see what sounds good
@ItsMeLos4 жыл бұрын
audio sounds like shit cause he recorded digital instead of analog
@royallmuzikproductionz4 жыл бұрын
Great detail. Hi there how would you sum in Ableton using an SSL six through a second Gen 18i20 from focusrite? Any help is welcomed. I'm currently sending my main out from 18i20 to 1 and 2 on the SSL and the main out of the SSL goes to the inputs 3abd 4 on the 18i20. I'm thinking there must be a better way but I can't work it out. I just got the SSL six yesterday. Cheers
@paulterl45634 жыл бұрын
Lots and lots of great records are recorded on tape, right now.
@51MontyPython3 жыл бұрын
Like which ones?
@MisterRorschach903 жыл бұрын
I do not believe that we will never be able to perfectly recreate analog signals. Sure we can’t do it now (albeit we are so close that only the most hardcore and trained people could tell the difference without tools) but eventually they will be able to. It’s just like when people say we won’t be able to do other things. Air planes, PCs, etc.
@powerbreed3 жыл бұрын
I dunno..., concrete is very small rocks and seems pretty smooth.
@Astronomater4 жыл бұрын
If I had only one piece of analog gear to record with, it would be a mic pre(probably the neve 500 series one.). The next piece would be an analog synth/drum machine. The stepping of digital signals are extremely fine. Finer than perceptible by humans. I have seen demonstrations of analog signals being converted to digital then getting sent to an analog oscilloscope and there is no stepping seen. Also the last few generations of audio interface(MOTU or focusrite gen 2 or 3) has such a low latency as to make it a non-factor when in every day use. The "theory" in this video is very ignorant, biased, and/or an over simplification.
@snap-off53833 жыл бұрын
No analog gating? Or is that built into your compressor?
@bobbyjohnson42434 жыл бұрын
Have you tried the pulsar vari-mu?
@sammacdonald82404 жыл бұрын
What song is playing in the background at the beginning?!
@Thermolizer3 жыл бұрын
Does anyone else feel really sceptical listening to videos about audio that have terrible audio
@djcj3 жыл бұрын
Great video
@felixV114 жыл бұрын
ironic considering the shockingly terrible audio quality in this video
@cjgoeson3 жыл бұрын
Meh... the “it will never be as smooth” is very misleading. First, it makes it seem like analog is-and will always be-better. Not true. Digital is way cleaner; that’s the half the problem; it’s often too clean. Second, no matter what you do, your music will end up digital anyway. And we’ll all be okay. 😉
@brooklynboy10004 жыл бұрын
I've had a Great RIver for many years now.. It was recomended by my mastering engineer.. BUY ONE. Its awesome. Jay - whats your choice for a great Condensor vocal mic ??(men/women).. thanks.
@bingybeats1892 жыл бұрын
Miktek CV4 all day
@dimitriskovaios4 жыл бұрын
Nice video! People just don't want to settle on the analog vs digital thing, however. An emulation of one piece of 1073 is an emulation of that particular 1073. Some other piece in better, or worse shape, might sound different. Personally I use a 73 style pre and 2a style compressor by Warm Audio and comparing them with digital emulations by Waves Audio, I can say they sound quite similar at similar settings. It's not a point of better analog, or worse digital and sure, all of them cost me a serious amount of money. But as the guy in the video explains, with analog you can go to extreme settings! And is more fun turning knobs, than clicking on the mouse, period! And your eyes will thank you, for less exposure to the computer screen... Horses for courses! Be prepared to invest on equipment, money you can actually afford, get it working and just make some f... music! That's all that matters... Just, move 'em people!
@Max10_B4 жыл бұрын
i have a warm audio wa73 eq and wa76 compressor. im running the preamp out into the compressor but i see that the wa73 preamp eq has an insert? am I doing this wrong? i guess im confused with my gainstaging for my signal. i usually dial the input in (back off 1 click from noticeable grit), then hit the eq if need be, then hit the yellow of the output trim on preamp and into my compressor, after comopressing 3-10db, i go line in to my focusrite. is this correct?
@DJL33BIRD3 жыл бұрын
sounds right to me
@jamesjross3 жыл бұрын
2:00 I wonder if digital signal will ever be as smooth as analog curve? I want to be told three times.
@jessewang97533 жыл бұрын
That’s a sensitive capsule
@Rick-pi9zn4 жыл бұрын
I thought he was holding a vaporiser in his hand at first
@fluorophoremusic36792 жыл бұрын
You don't prefer analog gear because you are losing the integrity or truth of the audio recording signal...you prefer analog gear because you are actively altering the integrity or truth of the original audio signal--it just happens to be in a pleasing way. It's literally the opposite that's explained in the video. Digital "waves" in practical reality never look like blocks...it's a misunderstanding of how digital sampling actually applies in the real world due to textbook illustrations, which were meant for theoretical understanding of concepts--or as a means to demonstrate differences between analog and digital in a graphical sense. I appreciate the video, however I think it's a bit misguided. From a recording engineer perspective, certainly you have more experience and that's why Reverb contracted you to make the video; from an audio engineer perspective (yes, crossover) there is certainly some statements made here that are misleading and false in the practical sense. In fact, if what you are saying is absolutely true, and the reasons you've highlighted are in fact the reasons that analog is preferable, then you'd nullify every point of your argument by re-sampling it back through your ADC/DAC interface into the DAW. In other words, you're saying that you use outboard gear for particular effects and recording usage because it's smoother...it sounds better because it's smoother; you don't like to do everything digital because of the theory you discussed in the beginning, that it will be less smooth despite the high sample rate. If this is the case--that is, if the digital sampling results in a loss of quality--wouldn't you just be losing all the analog goodness as soon as it get's resampled back from the outboard routing into your interface for analog-to-digital conversion; again, it will still only be able to re-created the signal in your DAW by "mario blocks" as you say. The only way your explanation would make sense is if you do EVERYTHING analog...including the print medium (to tape), and never even released the music on CD or through streaming services...but, only offered it as vinyl and perhaps reel-to-reel if even possible for the consumer. Otherwise, you will inevitably deal with this digital sampling conversion issue that you explain as the culprit. Thus, given the above contradiction, the reason analog is utilized has absolutely nothing to do with the fidelity of the signal being sampled (and, as explained a loss of smoothness or integrity) is actually and practically due to the seemingly pleasing audio artifacts, harmonic characteristics, and in reality imperfections of analog that result in it's supposed "richness", "warmth", "character", "soul", and any other intangible adjective used to describe analog superiority. In fact, the digital world processes the audio signal FAR, FAR more true to the real thing. In other words, when audio signals are processed within the digital environment, there is significantly less noise, and less colouring of the original sound. The same can't be said for analog processing; the signal is unavoidably adulterated far more than digital when processed through analog gear.
@RealHomeRecording2 жыл бұрын
What is "true"? As soon as a sound wave hits a microphone capsule, it is no longer "true". It is no longer "real"...it is a representation of the what the human ear would process. Sometimes, we don't position a microphone properly or we don't have time to pick the right microphone. Or we have a limited selection of microphones...so equalizer get us closer to that original sound that our ear perceives. Compressors help bring back that original "real" sound as well. But yes....I agree with your sentiment.
@starbattles14 жыл бұрын
" I'm not going to buy a tape machine....It's just not realistic any more" I have to LMFAO at that because I just bought an old school dual tape deck and guess what... The brand is REALISTIC Isn't it ironic.... don't ya think..... So yes.... it IS still realistic to buy a tape deck... lots of pun intended.
@sammacdonald82404 жыл бұрын
Please?! Does anyone know the song in the background?!
@hannanathan5644 жыл бұрын
It sounds like it might be the band Neck Deep but I'm not sure.
@vincentchevalier63214 жыл бұрын
If i buy all this stuff ,i'm a dead man 💣💣💣( dixit my dear wife )
@TyQuinn4 жыл бұрын
The statement "No matter how small you make those blocks, it will never be as smooth" is complete bullshit. Harry Nyquist might fight you on that statement.
@user-fl8qk3xs7p2 жыл бұрын
Yes that the truth ..analog is the best
@mikeszalzee3 жыл бұрын
Hard to trust a video about audio gear when the audio on the video is terrible.
@waltmodul79484 жыл бұрын
I have to stop it watching because of the background sound. Don’t tell us about sound quality with a stupid repeating loop.
@paltoquet4044 жыл бұрын
Why video sound is so bad ?!
@andyvo32892 жыл бұрын
Distortion 😁
@DrUmSensitive3 жыл бұрын
Shaking ribbon mics like that is a BIG NO NO! Guys, don't do that at home. EVER!
@Kezzeract4 жыл бұрын
Tape4Ever.
@ToneSherpa4 жыл бұрын
Tape Never. (because I'm poor)
@CaalamusTube4 жыл бұрын
@@ToneSherpa I got a Sony TC-570 on E-Bay for $50. I got a Tascam Porta Ø2 for $100. I've got a Wollensak T1500 my Brother found in a basement he was cleaning out... Tape is cheaper than a Computer.
@FirebrandVOCALS3 жыл бұрын
A transducer is a converter 😎👊
@larrytan733 жыл бұрын
People still use tape
@ulfsvensson97104 жыл бұрын
Why the background music? I thought a man talking like to be heard?!
@ToneSherpa4 жыл бұрын
To cover up what ever buzz or noise they didn't realize was there until editing. Listen close you can just hear some of the artifacts from the noise plugin they used.
@CaalamusTube4 жыл бұрын
@@ToneSherpa plus people have been adding low background Music to Videos with a Monologue since forever... it helps prevent people from stealing your Vocal Capture & using it.
@modvind3 жыл бұрын
This guy doesn't know how digital sound works, it seems. No, you don't get stairsteps. And yes, the EXACT original analog signal is what you're gonna get when converted back to analog again
@grandentrance72703 жыл бұрын
The things id do if i had money
@mwintersteinsmith4 жыл бұрын
😎 I totally agree 👏👏👏🎼🎵🎤
@julientaylor4 жыл бұрын
Gsus, you guys shouldn't be PRO-TIPING anyone! with the crappy sound of this video. the backround music is too loud. the naration sounds like its MP3 @32kbps CBR. TSSTSS
@eupraxis14 жыл бұрын
A "pre"? Say preamp, please.
@mikehawk94614 жыл бұрын
Reverb is really going downhill, terrible.
@tyoyusuf85014 жыл бұрын
go to mollucass island
@mcastromusic4 жыл бұрын
8:49 is he using auto tune? lol
@brooklynboy10004 жыл бұрын
id say hes a bit nervous, had too much coffee, and the editing is choppy... too lazy to get the performance right.. would he do that with a band or make them do the song a million times until it was perfect? ... ah the downfall of our split second world
@chinmeysway3 жыл бұрын
That’s a lot a dough for us non trustfund cuties out there lol booyeah but ok I’m sure Spotify listeners will really love that I went to those measures, will really hear the diff ha no jk; I’m just being a butthole
@tyoyusuf85014 жыл бұрын
go to borneo
@dinamixstudios93393 жыл бұрын
Great video on how to use outboard gear! I recently uploaded a mixing tutorial, where I demonstrate how to connect an outboard unit, with the right cables. Check it out: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/r86AY7eL29fJgY0.html