Why you didn't learn tetration in school[Tetration]

  Рет қаралды 3,786,022

Prime Newtons

Prime Newtons

Жыл бұрын

In this video, I explained why not many people know about tetration because it is of little relevance to every day numbers
Buy the t-shirt here
shorturl.at/HNUX1

Пікірлер: 11 000
@frtzkng
@frtzkng 6 ай бұрын
2 is also the only number for which a+a = a·a = a^a = a↑↑a = a↑↑↑a and so on, no matter how many times you iterate this process. The result is always 4.
@TaranVaranYT
@TaranVaranYT 6 ай бұрын
so if a = b = 2, then for any n greater than 0, the hyperoperation associated with n in the form a (whatever hyperoperation you are using) b will always compute to be 2? ok
@blackovich
@blackovich 6 ай бұрын
@@TaranVaranYT yes.
@rsi4054
@rsi4054 6 ай бұрын
you mean this right? : 10 ^ { 10 ^ { 10 } } =10^100 and the guy says :small 10 with the 10
@user-hi8jv6cw8n
@user-hi8jv6cw8n 6 ай бұрын
you see, I thought this as well at 1st, but then realized that 10^10 isn't 100, but 10,000,000,000 @@rsi4054
@rsi4054
@rsi4054 6 ай бұрын
@@user-hi8jv6cw8n get thx
@matthewstoicism1485
@matthewstoicism1485 Жыл бұрын
16 . . . I see why you have chosen a base of two.
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons Жыл бұрын
Yeah. Things get huge really fast here.
@ChraO_o
@ChraO_o 7 ай бұрын
³2 is 2⁸ or 256
@ChraO_o
@ChraO_o 7 ай бұрын
@@tonytinza what the hell did my brain do, did it just really said, yeah 2² is 8
@Zeoncxtoy
@Zeoncxtoy 7 ай бұрын
@@ChraO_o the concept i understood is that it is repeated exponents. for instance, we know exponent is repeated multiplication, so by looking into the consept of tetration, it can be seen that it's vasically repeated exponent
@ChraO_o
@ChraO_o 7 ай бұрын
@@Zeoncxtoy there are multiple types of this as to try and reach higher numbers, but they're just numbers.
@QUBIQUBED
@QUBIQUBED 6 ай бұрын
1.Multiplication is repeated addition 2.Exponentiation is repeated multiplication 3.Therefore, exponentiation is the process of repeatedly repeating addition 4.Tetration is the repetition of exponentiation, therefore... *Tetration is the repetition of the process of repeatedly repeating addition*
@anirchakraborty4953
@anirchakraborty4953 5 ай бұрын
Now I wonder what the process of repeated tetration will be called..
@0xonomy
@0xonomy 5 ай бұрын
@@anirchakraborty4953 repeated repetition of the process of repeatedly repeating addition? i dont really know man
@MugsyBogues
@MugsyBogues 5 ай бұрын
@@anirchakraborty4953its pentation
@parthpatel9602
@parthpatel9602 5 ай бұрын
​@@0xonomythanks for making it easy man.
@TheNaz_O5-15
@TheNaz_O5-15 5 ай бұрын
​@@anirchakraborty4953I think it's called pentation, someone in the comments said it.
@E063
@E063 24 күн бұрын
You are still liking the comments after over a year, wow! I've found it 16 as well. I hope everyone could get a teacher like you, you seem to do your work fabulous! :)
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons 24 күн бұрын
I hope so too!
@Nomommiesway.
@Nomommiesway. 11 күн бұрын
For some reason, I find it woerd that you can write 10 billion, but you can't write 10 billion zeros
@anakinmeh928
@anakinmeh928 7 күн бұрын
@@Nomommiesway. bro you have to be kidding right!?
@user-dx8ol9bm1k
@user-dx8ol9bm1k 7 күн бұрын
16
@o_o888
@o_o888 4 күн бұрын
@@Nomommiesway.10 billion the word is 9 letters the number has 10 zeros We are talking about billions of zeros
@justine.3416
@justine.3416 Ай бұрын
now imagine ³(³2)
@MileRancid
@MileRancid 21 күн бұрын
Parenthesis first, so 2 multiplied by itself 4 times = 16, so then 16 multiplied by (16 multiplied by itself by 16) so 16x16x16.. 16 times which = 1.8446744e+19 (so big my calculator can’t handle it). 16 *MULTIPLIED BY ITSELF THIS NUMBER OF TIMES* 1.8446744e+19
@MileRancid
@MileRancid 21 күн бұрын
The result on my calculator is infinity, not even joking
@MileRancid
@MileRancid 21 күн бұрын
Now imagine 1.8446744e+19 factorial
@justine.3416
@justine.3416 20 күн бұрын
@@MileRancid that's actually insane. tetration is scary
@MileRancid
@MileRancid 18 күн бұрын
@@justine.3416 wait till you find out about pentation
@pranavvishwekar2509
@pranavvishwekar2509 5 ай бұрын
It's 16...... The last dialogue: "Never stop learning... One who stops learning, stops living..." Touched my heart.❤
@SatyamGupta-hk2gg
@SatyamGupta-hk2gg 5 ай бұрын
The one who stops learning, starts dying
@WeeMasterEmerald
@WeeMasterEmerald 5 ай бұрын
@@SatyamGupta-hk2gg are dead*
@RedSkeletone
@RedSkeletone 5 ай бұрын
that's what I thought
@mr.mystery9338
@mr.mystery9338 5 ай бұрын
How is it 16? The way I see it is 2^2^2=2x2x2=8
@fredericlaviolette5041
@fredericlaviolette5041 5 ай бұрын
@@mr.mystery9338 Look at it this way : 2^(2^2) = 2^4 = 2x2x2x2 = 16
@GnrMilligan
@GnrMilligan 7 ай бұрын
Not only do I respect your intelligence and knowledge. But I am so impressed with your ability to write so neatly on a chalk board!
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons 7 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@pradyothkumarb8330
@pradyothkumarb8330 7 ай бұрын
Also that board is super clean😅. Doesn't look like it's used everyday
@neevhingrajia3822
@neevhingrajia3822 7 ай бұрын
​​@@pradyothkumarb8330you can clearly see that someone cleaned it just before the video was shot
@Everyoneneedsafriend
@Everyoneneedsafriend 7 ай бұрын
​@neevhingrajia3822 i believe it was a joke
@icantcook9998
@icantcook9998 7 ай бұрын
Bloody teachers pet you're not supposed to get a heart for bum kissing
@anointedone1995
@anointedone1995 Күн бұрын
Your excitement is contagious. May no one ever take your joy away from you. God bless.
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons Күн бұрын
Amen
@Longest-Word-In-English
@Longest-Word-In-English Ай бұрын
Tetration is a mathematical operation that involves repeatedly raising a number to the power of itself. This operation is an extension of exponentiation, which involves raising a number to a specified power. In tetration, the number is raised to the power of itself multiple times in a tower-like structure. Tetration can result in very large numbers, making it a fascinating concept in mathematics. Mathematicians use tetration to explore complex patterns and relationships within numbers.
@xkyoshi11
@xkyoshi11 8 күн бұрын
Brought to you by ChatGPT.
@NoNameX_X0
@NoNameX_X0 7 ай бұрын
math just like any class always becomes a lot more fun when your teacher is enthusiastic to teach you the subject.
@Jigolopuff
@Jigolopuff 7 ай бұрын
i think the problem is that teachers dont bring in real world uses for the math being taught.
@satswak
@satswak 7 ай бұрын
and also they do not have the feel to teach
@fenidiv4325
@fenidiv4325 7 ай бұрын
​@@Jigolopuffatleast elementary maths is used in the real world
@Alwaysright42250
@Alwaysright42250 7 ай бұрын
​​@@JigolopuffI think you are missing one crucial point. Teaching advanced math to students not only makes them able to solve the problem they undoubtedly won't coincide irl, it will also increase the capability of advanced thinking. This can also be seen on streets, when you see a collage graduate and a high school drop off, also if you are somewhat educated, chances are, you can easily feel the difference. From their language to behavior and ways of thinking. I'm not saying math is for everyone, tho people should find their own gift and study. Btw nice nickname
@jaimelannister1797
@jaimelannister1797 7 ай бұрын
@@Jigolopuffcause most the time it doesn’t have real world use
@AdonizedeckAckahBlayMiezah
@AdonizedeckAckahBlayMiezah Ай бұрын
16 is the answer. I like how you put passion in what you do; meaning you like what you're doing.
@smoumitajana3522
@smoumitajana3522 Ай бұрын
Thank you so much ! I was kinda exhausted learning the old things.... this new thing kinda lifted up my spirits !! Hope you'll continue presenting these new concepts !! 😃
@kwahlman
@kwahlman 7 ай бұрын
16. This is because "2 tetrated to 3" means we need 2 "floors" of exponents. The "ground floor" is also part of the 3, this is why we only have 2 floors above ground level and not 3. Like this: 2^(2^2) = 2^(4) = 16. If it was 2 tetrated to 4 it would be: 2^(2^(2^2)) = 2^(2^(4)) = 2^(16) = 65536. It quickly gets very big.
@jirisebesta1497
@jirisebesta1497 7 ай бұрын
Mother fucker dont tell me this is not written by chatGPT, this is very easy to do on your own
@nix_
@nix_ 7 ай бұрын
I got the same answer!
@McSmurfy
@McSmurfy 7 ай бұрын
Damn the 2 tetrated to 4 got me messed up, but think I get it now.
@SeeltheProgrammer
@SeeltheProgrammer 7 ай бұрын
I understand it now, thanks for the explanation!
@voltznake9248
@voltznake9248 7 ай бұрын
wouldnt the exponents simply multiply with eachother? 2^2^2^2 (or 2 tetrated to 4) would be 2^(2*2*2)=256 right?
@wendigo7021
@wendigo7021 Ай бұрын
never in my life thought that i would be watching a video about maths that will not be in my exam
@bwkanimations7352
@bwkanimations7352 24 күн бұрын
bro can i retweet
@wendigo7021
@wendigo7021 24 күн бұрын
@@bwkanimations7352 sure why not
@BickBull
@BickBull 19 күн бұрын
Me neither mate, i never taught I'd take math as entertaining matter in my life.
@Batmann_
@Batmann_ 17 күн бұрын
Wtf do people think "maths" stands for or is an abbreviation of? Math is short for mathematics. So, "maths" is mathematicses?
@sabretoothc2591
@sabretoothc2591 17 күн бұрын
Maths is the most boring subject for me and yet I'm still watching this
@champgameplay4831
@champgameplay4831 Күн бұрын
Nah i watched your eigenvalue video for my calc 3 class and found this gem, ngl you might be one of the few passionate teachers on youtube, u genuinely have fun with maths and that's i think is rare nowadays, hats off to you gentlemen.
@kingsix2000
@kingsix2000 10 күн бұрын
I have studied math at uni for 5 years and never come across the definition this. As you said it is probably because it is a bit useless (as ³10 is basically infinity). Very interesting and a nugget of knowledge. Thanks!
@paulyvii
@paulyvii 7 ай бұрын
Never thought I'd enjoy a math lesson. Thank you sir
@JohnFekoloid
@JohnFekoloid 7 ай бұрын
But on exam day, he will bring out 0.8 ^ 25.37
@Gadottinho
@Gadottinho 7 ай бұрын
Bruh, math classes are the best
@David280GG
@David280GG 7 ай бұрын
​@@JohnFekoloid😭
@aprilbrandon3441
@aprilbrandon3441 7 ай бұрын
Noice
@mrkoyunreis
@mrkoyunreis 7 ай бұрын
"Look what the schools need to do just to mimic a fraction of my power!"
@gongometube
@gongometube 7 ай бұрын
There is nothing greater than an enthusiastic professor who can communicate the topic exceptionally.
@appsenence9244
@appsenence9244 7 ай бұрын
exceptionally? Don't you mean, expontentially?
@peterproductions5015
@peterproductions5015 7 ай бұрын
@@appsenence9244Smart fella, this one.
@Quvexe
@Quvexe 7 ай бұрын
​@@appsenence9244Haha
@ethaniscool315
@ethaniscool315 7 ай бұрын
nice@@appsenence9244
@scottwatts3879
@scottwatts3879 6 ай бұрын
And I'm still looking for him.
@huz653
@huz653 3 күн бұрын
The answer is 16 because 2 to the power of 2 to the power of 2, so you have 3 twos which is why it is called the 3rd titration of 2, it’s kinda like how powered numbers work but it is bigger, turn the multiplications into powers.
@Bzons
@Bzons 20 күн бұрын
Found this in my recommendation, learned something new, was not disappointed. Good work.
@deltakyy3894
@deltakyy3894 7 ай бұрын
“dont stop learning, because those who stopped learning, stopped living.” as a person who nerds out when talking about math, that hit hard
@TheOneOtaku
@TheOneOtaku 7 ай бұрын
I’m a science nerd but Ig im good in math
@TheDankian1421
@TheDankian1421 7 ай бұрын
EXACTLY.
@TheDankian1421
@TheDankian1421 7 ай бұрын
@@TheOneOtaku What? Most Of Science IS Caused By Math, A BUNCH Of Math.
@louiesatterwhite3885
@louiesatterwhite3885 7 ай бұрын
​@@TheDankian1421when you get down to it, chemistry, biology, physics, and math are all interconnected on a fundamental level
@neth7826
@neth7826 7 ай бұрын
Bruce Lee also said that! EDIT: Shoot, what he actually said was "An intelligent mind is one which is constantly learning, never concluding - styles and patterns have come to conclusion, therefore they [have] ceased to be intelligent." Probably still makes sense in this context..
@welcometochiles6156
@welcometochiles6156 7 ай бұрын
During the 10^3 bit, it occured to me that in my math experience, I lost the meaning of some of these values. 100 to 1000 is huge, but I really do forget the scale of numbers sometimes.
@randomguyontheinternet5030
@randomguyontheinternet5030 7 ай бұрын
I guess it always depends on what the numbers mean. 100 atoms vs 1000 atoms is next to nothing. 100 houses vs 1000 houses is very big. 100 planets vs 1000 planets is unfathomably large.
@sk8pkl
@sk8pkl 7 ай бұрын
Well then think about the 1-2-4-8-16-32.... series. Do you know that you only need to add them together in order to get every other number in between? And you never need to repeat 1 of them.... that's why/how computers exist/work basically. Think about how many numbers there are between 2-4 and 128-256... and so on 😮. It works INFINITELY. It means the x2 series gives birth to all numbers as well as the 1+1 series does. Its just disturbing how perfect and efficient it is to derive all numbers from the 1x2... series...(binary code...bits...bytes...and so on). The universe is just amazing when you think about it sometimes. Division and doubling is at the very core of each of its seemingly random processes... all of em even sound, light and matter... constants.. ect.
@Obi1Classic
@Obi1Classic 7 ай бұрын
Vsauce did an analysis on this. Our brains think logarithmically (e.g. 1, 10, 100, 1000, ...), not cumulatively (1, 2, 3, 4, ...). It allows us to think in scales and relativity of the massive sizes of galaxies to the invisibly small sizes of atoms.
@dekippiesip
@dekippiesip 7 ай бұрын
​@Obi1Classic yup we often underestimate our brains. We can easily think of planets and galaxies or atoms and electrons. We just need to discuss them in 'peer to peer' contexts of other objects that are just as large within an order of magnitude or so. What is HARD to imagine is not the size of our entire planet or even the distance to the closest star, but the ratio between the 2. That is going to surprise you, and it's hard to mentally model it. If you do you're probably needing a second map, that is another layer of abstraction.
@welcometochiles6156
@welcometochiles6156 7 ай бұрын
@@dekippiesip my brain is now bigger :D
@peyt23
@peyt23 4 күн бұрын
I got 16. Love the commitment you show to this video by the way! I just want to thank you for showing your teaching so well, and explaining in such a clear fashion as to why tetration is not taught, and for teaching me another fact. Thanks a lot man!
@GamersFanBase200
@GamersFanBase200 27 күн бұрын
Thank you so much! for teaching us this lesson. It is really something new that maybe very few people actually know and use also.
@IRHrok
@IRHrok 7 ай бұрын
We’ve found it boys! a math lesson that I will actually never use in real life! Great concept and I loved your explanation
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons 7 ай бұрын
Glad you liked it!!
@infernoninja5195
@infernoninja5195 7 ай бұрын
i'm gonna use it to express the amount of people who did your mom
@mickenoss
@mickenoss 7 ай бұрын
I dunno, I'll be using this for my weekly shop soon I reckon. 😂
@Deathwindgames
@Deathwindgames 7 ай бұрын
⁠@@mickenossa fellow dark matter purchaser?
@Kaka_Doctor_91
@Kaka_Doctor_91 7 ай бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/m7yCfa91la6uk3k.htmlsi=fEII6tEEK-zbApDh 👈 At the end of this video you will see the "real life use" of tetration!!
@simplyy.aviation
@simplyy.aviation 5 ай бұрын
Maths becomes interesting when it's taught by an enthusiastic teacher like you!!
@shiulai5804
@shiulai5804 6 күн бұрын
Thank you. You explain it very well. I have been working with numbers all my life. I am 82 now. I don’t expect to see something on KZfaq about arithmetics that I have not seen before. Thank you again.
@user-nl1pg1pf5i
@user-nl1pg1pf5i Ай бұрын
Based on the well instructed lesson with hints that make you see, the answer cannot be missed. It can be said that raised value number is equal to the base number raised based operation twice, such that ^3 base 2 = (2^2)^2 = 16. So the example given, provided the key information to solve. Thus (10^10)^10 = 10^100. Prince Newton, you are amazing.
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons 7 ай бұрын
I hope this clarifies what I said. 10↑↑3 is written as 1 followed by 10 billion zeros. There is enough space in my house to print out the number with 10 billion zeros. What I meant to say in the video was that if I had to write down all the numbers from 1 to 10↑↑3, there would not be enough space in the known universe to write them all even if every atom is large enough to write on.
@lubomirkubasdQw4w9WgXcQ
@lubomirkubasdQw4w9WgXcQ 7 ай бұрын
i was about to ask about that. it would probably take about 1,000 years to write it, or 2,000 maybe.
@lubomirkubasdQw4w9WgXcQ
@lubomirkubasdQw4w9WgXcQ 7 ай бұрын
no, more like 700 years i think
@magentamonster
@magentamonster 7 ай бұрын
10↑3 = 1000. As a single arrow is exponentiation. 10↑↑3 is 1 followed by 10 billion zeros.
@davidturizo2847
@davidturizo2847 7 ай бұрын
Really? It maked sense to me in the video now I’m confused
@OJB42
@OJB42 7 ай бұрын
Yeah, I thought that was an error, but just a misinterpretation.
@YaBoiATEG
@YaBoiATEG 6 ай бұрын
16 i think, you taught this better in 6 mins than my math teacher would in an hour, also explained how the powered numbers work too! You've gained my respect, and a new sub
@feiyu8817
@feiyu8817 6 ай бұрын
Bruh. This should be a 20 second video. If you need an hour to learn this, it’s not you’re teacher bud.
@pannumon
@pannumon 6 ай бұрын
@@feiyu8817 How long did it take for you to learn multiplication, exponents, logarithm, basic trigonometry, derivation, integration and the rest of the really simple things? 30minutes, maybe 45? How many hours did you study these things in school? Knowing what something means is different than understanding it and being able to use the knowledge.
@petelee2477
@petelee2477 6 ай бұрын
​​​​@@pannumonThe only reason early math difficult is because it involves mostly memorization but once you've learned the fundamentals then math becomes really easy. The majority of college and highschool math was essentially plug numbers into a formula and then hit enter on the calculator.
@petelee2477
@petelee2477 6 ай бұрын
Really 3 minutes because the first half of the video was explaining exponents which can be skipped if you already know what they are.
@maggyfrog
@maggyfrog 6 ай бұрын
the difference between ³2 and ⁴2 is comical 😹
@ericgrimard4608
@ericgrimard4608 Ай бұрын
Good work sir. More like you would not be any competition and your contribution is precious. All my respect, may God bless you, sir, and your precious two bits in. I say Thanks for all those who won't.
@WebStacks500
@WebStacks500 Ай бұрын
Amazing Video! They don't teach this in school but I had heard of it before, thanks for explaining how it works. "Don't stop learning, those who stop learning have stopped living" Such a moving thought! 🤩
@flederflick
@flederflick 7 ай бұрын
I was expecting a huge number again, but I think it's 16. According to your explanation it would be written as 2 to the power of 2 to the power of 2. The last two become 4 and that makes 2 to the power of 4 which is 16. Never knew about tetration. Never to old to learn. Thanks
@louisrobitaille5810
@louisrobitaille5810 7 ай бұрын
Now have fun learning about pentation, hexation, and so on until you stumble upon Graham's number 😂.
@Wilson-AM
@Wilson-AM 7 ай бұрын
22 mins ago!
@howtobasic2.031
@howtobasic2.031 7 ай бұрын
@@louisrobitaille5810 brudda get to raydons number
@bzibubabbzibubab420
@bzibubabbzibubab420 7 ай бұрын
my granpa is graham @@louisrobitaille5810
@Carl_with_a_k_
@Carl_with_a_k_ 7 ай бұрын
my personal favourite is penetration @@louisrobitaille5810
@scotty3114
@scotty3114 7 ай бұрын
I believe in trying to learn something new each day (and not triva). I am 79 and have never seen this before. If I understand what's going on, then the answer should be 16. Although, I almost convinced myself on 256, but decided I was getting carried away by all the numbers😅. Thank you for the lesson and the knowledge.
@hugh.g.rection5906
@hugh.g.rection5906 7 ай бұрын
i did the same thing and came up with the same answers as you. realised i was wrong, thought properly and reached 16. great minds think alike lol
@scotty3114
@scotty3114 7 ай бұрын
@@hugh.g.rection5906 Yes, we do! 😁🤣
@richroll9894
@richroll9894 6 күн бұрын
As a social studies teacher (who myself has a math disorder and alllllways struggled with it greatly) I appreciate your instruction! Being autistic, I got the NON math-genius variety, and instead got the “I make 3 right turns instead of one left turn and don’t realize there was an easier way until 4 weeks later” type, so math based subjects always trip me up, but your manner of explaining and visualization is fantastic, your students are very lucky!
@hiimsaulcaveman
@hiimsaulcaveman 6 күн бұрын
That was very interesting to know, added with your calming voice!
@futotheone
@futotheone 5 ай бұрын
The tetration of 3, denoted as 2↑↑3, is equal to 2^(2^2), which is 2 raised to the power of 2 raised to the power of 2. So, 2 to the tetration of 3 is 16 (2^(2^2) = 2^4 = 16).
@Atmatan_Kabbaher
@Atmatan_Kabbaher 5 ай бұрын
I'm so confused by the notation more than anything. Abstract infinities make intuitive sense to me. The way you humans describe them makes my organs hurt.
@El.Primo0
@El.Primo0 5 ай бұрын
what@@Atmatan_Kabbaher
@satgurs
@satgurs 5 ай бұрын
@@Atmatan_Kabbaher "The way you humans describe them makes my organs hurt." bro's not a human
@sefutho
@sefutho 5 ай бұрын
Thank you SIR for your explanation. I feel like a genius now 🙏🏾
@jasminerochas-oq8jw
@jasminerochas-oq8jw 5 ай бұрын
This is a tetration of 2, not of 3.
@Arel_Kursat
@Arel_Kursat 4 ай бұрын
The enthusiasm you put into this video just makes it 10 times easier and better to learn. Thank you kind sir!
@UnohanaMash
@UnohanaMash 4 ай бұрын
10 times? Or 10 times 10 times 10 times 10 times…
@MoonDark-mq8ex
@MoonDark-mq8ex 3 ай бұрын
​@@UnohanaMash😂
@MantoHazra
@MantoHazra 3 ай бұрын
​@@UnohanaMashHAHA
@loganeliott6590
@loganeliott6590 3 ай бұрын
FR
@Davidsavage8008
@Davidsavage8008 Күн бұрын
Awesome, it makes calculating our debt so much easier. Thank you.
@darknessispower3296
@darknessispower3296 Күн бұрын
This video suddenly recommended to me.. I am glad that i got it.. and the answer is 16.. i was confused first but then i understood.. Thanks for this!✨
@ryanman0083
@ryanman0083 7 ай бұрын
You can also evaluate non integer hyper powers like 2^^π NOTE: I use HLog as notation for Hyper Logarithm Another common notation is slog for Super Logarithm Hyper Logarithm (one inverse of Tetration) is repeated Logarithm by definition. Let T=The total number of Logs til the answer ≤ 1 r = the remainder of the last log HLog a(b) = x --> a^^x = b by definition of hyper logarithms x=(T-1)+r By definition of Tetration, a^^x = a^(a^^x-1)… Taking HLoga(z) Given z is not an integer hyper power of a Let HLoga(z) = b+x Given 0 ≤ x ≤ 1 and b=Z z = a^^(b+x) = a^a^^(b-1+x) = a^a^...(b copies)...^a^^x By definition of tetration z = a^a^...(b copies)...^a^x By definition of Hyper Log (Repeated Logarithm) They both equal z thus they equal eachother a^a^...(b copies)...^a^x = a^a^...(b copies)...^a^^x The entire tower cancels via Loga() on both sides, leaving a^x = a^^x Given 0 ≤ x ≤ 1 Therefore a^^x = a^x Given 0 ≤ x ≤ 1 is true by definition. We can solve 2^^π 2^^π = 2^2^^(π-1) = 2^2^2^^(π-2) = 2^2^2^2^^(π-3) 2^^π = 2^2^2^2^(π-3) ≈ 21.596356101 2^2^2^2^^(π-3) = 2^2^2^2^(π-3) ≈ 21.596356101 (Notice you can Log2 both sides and be left with 2^^(π-3) = 2^(π-3). ) We can also check this Log2(21.596356101) ≈ 4.4327160055 --> 1st Log Log2(4.4327160055) ≈ 2.1481909351 --> 2nd Log Log2(2.1481909351) ≈ 1.1031222284 --> 3rd Log Log2(1.1031222284) ≈ 0.1415926536 --> 4th Log, answer ≤ 1 --> r For 2^^x = 21.596356101 x=(T-1)+r, 4 total Logs x=(4-1)+r = 3+r = 3+0.1415926536 = 3.1415926536 ≈ π (obviously. with irrationals there will be possible rounding errors) Thus 2^^π ≈ 21.596356101 is indeed true
@thomasminh8244
@thomasminh8244 7 ай бұрын
im still in highschool, your magic words are scaring me
@TheDiamondPro44
@TheDiamondPro44 7 ай бұрын
I ain't readin allat (I read it and have no idea what you're saying magic man)
@VictorianSnailGod
@VictorianSnailGod 7 ай бұрын
@@thomasminh8244I graduated literally last year and I’m getting scared by these magic words
@the_Mousee
@the_Mousee 7 ай бұрын
​@@thomasminh8244relatable, I think I just got my mind melted
@mission2858
@mission2858 7 ай бұрын
Time* to go even further ahead in my maths education and work out what the fuck this means.
@bunnybeetle1304
@bunnybeetle1304 7 ай бұрын
I wish I had a teacher like you. It is so evident that you love what you are teaching us here.
@bunnybeetle1304
@bunnybeetle1304 7 ай бұрын
oh cool i got it right!
@ACuriousChild
@ACuriousChild 7 ай бұрын
Which is what GOD ALMIGHTY is all about ... inexhaustible knowledge about HIS CREATION ... and it never stops no matter how much HE has taught any of them!
@Respect_truth_tellers
@Respect_truth_tellers 6 ай бұрын
@@ACuriousChild huh 😶‍🌫?
@UpsideLearn
@UpsideLearn Ай бұрын
Such a cool concept! Thank you for sharing.
@JacobRVH
@JacobRVH 4 күн бұрын
16 because ³2 is like writing 2^2^2^2, where the base is used as an exponent, and the 3 in front indicates how many times the exponent is repeated. ³2 written in exponent form would be 2⁴
@draco2333
@draco2333 7 ай бұрын
16. 2 is the smallest base of complete numbers to not completely overload our imagenation. Very nice! Really like your video🙏 + very nice code in the end❤
@dyanosis
@dyanosis 6 ай бұрын
Incorrect, 1 would be the smallest base to not overload us. 1 raised to the 1 raised to the 1 is still 1. Wrecked.
@milanhaver3915
@milanhaver3915 6 ай бұрын
no he's right. if you go past 2 (3 for example) it quickly becomes unimaginable but with 2 as the base it you still can.@@dyanosis
@astromache
@astromache 6 ай бұрын
@@milanhaver3915 no he's wrong if he said largest then he would be right
@Toast_Sandwich
@Toast_Sandwich 6 ай бұрын
@@astromacheand what of 0?
@astromache
@astromache 6 ай бұрын
@@Toast_Sandwich if 0 is the number in supertext would it not just be 1? however the other way around I have no idea.
@cmills14916
@cmills14916 7 ай бұрын
I'm a math teacher, and this was fun to watch! Awesome, and good job making it fun!
@Hanible
@Hanible 7 ай бұрын
Please help me figure out this 🙏 I'm having a seizure: Why is it that 10billion ^ 10 isn't equal the 10^10billion they should be equal because order doesn't matter when doing 10^10^10 right? And yet the former is 1 followed by 100 zeros and the latter is 1 followed by 10billion zeros..
@gammergames3322
@gammergames3322 7 ай бұрын
well first off, in 10^10^10 they are all the same number so thats why it doesn't matter. but also, when 10^10B has to multiply by 10, 10 billion times and when we are talking exponentials it gets out of control. 10B^10 is only multiplying by itself 10 times, which is just incomparable. The exponent matters way more than the number you start with, any feasible number to the 10B is gonna be light years bigger than any feasible number to the 10@@Hanible
@Henry.25
@Henry.25 7 ай бұрын
​@@HanibleI don't know if I understood your question correctly (English is not my first language) so I'm just going to talk about the issue of order. There is an order to carry out tetration. I don't know how to explain why, but you always start from top to bottom. (or right to left) Ex: ⁴3= 3^3^3^3 3^3^27 3^7,625, 597, 484, 987 = Big ass number
@shiva11456
@shiva11456 7 ай бұрын
​@@Hanible, they are not equal becos for 10 000,000,000^10 = 10^(10^2) based on law of indices, which is not equal to 10^(10^10). Think about it and you will get an ans. 🙂
@Hanible
@Hanible 7 ай бұрын
@shiva11456 yeah I already know 10B^10=10^(10^2) that's why I said it's 1 followed by 100 zeros... And I noticed they weren't equal that's the whole point, my question is why aren't they equal? I thought order didn't matter when doing a^b^c... but if it matters why does it matter? 🤔
@dazrmorrison9558
@dazrmorrison9558 7 күн бұрын
Tetration is a hyperoperation that involves iterated exponentiation. The notation \( ^n a \) denotes the \( n \)-times iterated exponentiation of \( a \). For example, \( ^3 2 \) means 2 raised to the power of 2, raised to the power of 2. For \( ^3 2 \), this can be calculated as: \[ ^3 2 = 2^{2^2} \] First, solve the innermost exponentiation: \[ 2^2 = 4 \] Then, use this result as the exponent for the base 2: \[ 2^4 = 2 \times 2 \times 2 \times 2 = 16 \] Therefore, \( ^3 2 = 16 \).
@brother.753
@brother.753 7 сағат бұрын
It took me a long time to justify that the answer is 16, for about 10 minutes, and I finally figured out why, really good job sir, now I have to get back to my studies, the mathematics I need to use so that I can pass the exams, wish me luck ❤
@Scarfy101
@Scarfy101 Ай бұрын
this is the first time i've stuck around for a six minute video of a 10 second explanation, his demeanor and voice are just that likable.
@first-namelast-name
@first-namelast-name 7 ай бұрын
A generalisation of tetration is Knut's up-arrow notation. It's basically the same concept with the notation 2↑3 for 2³, 2↑↑3 for ³2, but you don't stop there and go with how many arrows you want, for example, 2↑↑↑3 is 2↑↑2↑↑2 which is 2↑↑2↑2=2↑↑4=2↑2↑2↑2=2↑16=2¹⁶=65'536. I really recommend searching about this, especially about Graham's number, which is the biggest number used in a mathematical proof(Edit: apparently not anymore? Couldn't find any proofs, tho. Any information could help Edit in the edit:G64(Graham's number) is still the biggest in a demonstration after further researches). Next to this number, ³10 doesn't seem that big. It looks horrifically tiny, as a matter of fact. Edit: I forgot to say that these operations are, as exponentiation, right-associative. This means that you calculate them from right to left just like you calculate exponentiation from top to bottom.
@TekExplorer
@TekExplorer 7 ай бұрын
Not sure where you got "up arrow" from - the character you mean is actually on your keyboard: "^"
7 ай бұрын
@@TekExplorernope, that particular notation uses up arrows, as dictated by the name..
@l3dcobra120
@l3dcobra120 7 ай бұрын
@ He's clearly talking about the lesser-known Knuth's Caret Notation.
@first-namelast-name
@first-namelast-name 7 ай бұрын
​@@TekExplorerthe caret is only used as a replacement for up arrows when they are not available on the keyboard. On paper or when you have access to them you will tend to use the complete arrow. If you want to verify this information, I found it on Wikipedia on the "Knuth's up-arrows notation" page in the "notation" category
@Iammankey
@Iammankey 7 ай бұрын
Well then what's 3↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑3?
@shanegriffin6637
@shanegriffin6637 14 күн бұрын
I feel so productive watching educational videos.
@shubassingh6783
@shubassingh6783 25 күн бұрын
This is the first video of your chanel which i have seen. That shows that this channel is for knowledge.
@DevonBering
@DevonBering 7 ай бұрын
Anyone wanna say what ³3 is? HINT: It is more than the amount of money that Elon Musk has
@chimyshark
@chimyshark 7 ай бұрын
1.55 billion
@noobiesensei6281
@noobiesensei6281 7 ай бұрын
7,62 trillions. This shit is ridiculous.
@CatNolara
@CatNolara 7 ай бұрын
actually not that much, only 19,683
@nekro1977
@nekro1977 7 ай бұрын
@@CatNolaraNo. You did 3^(3*3) which is not how tetration works. In tetration the outermost exponent is in the innermost brack so 3 tetrated to three 3^(3^3) or 3^27 which is ~7.6 trillion
@CatNolara
@CatNolara 7 ай бұрын
@@nekro1977 oh, I see. I thought it wouldn't matter, but you're right, it does matter (unlike the multiplication in normal quadration)
@jalenanderson9706
@jalenanderson9706 6 ай бұрын
I liked when you said "those who have stopped learning are those who have stopped living." It reminded me of my senior quote: "to live is to learn, to learn is to grow, to grow is to live."
@jballenger9240
@jballenger9240 5 ай бұрын
And…”Knowledge breeds enthusiasm!” When students say a subject is boring, I tell them it is because they don’t know enough about the subject.
@sonorabbyy
@sonorabbyy 19 күн бұрын
OoOOooO my cerebral cortex is tingling!!! I love math, and I favored it more so when I had a patient and well spoken math teacher. You’re awesome 🥲
@Jelly27Fish
@Jelly27Fish 6 күн бұрын
So 2 with the tetration of 3 is 16 2 with the tetration of 4 is 256 3 with the tetration of 2 is 27 3 with the tetration of 3 is 81 And 10 with the tetration of 3 is a Googol with the exponent of 10. Ngl, I WISH I could've learned this in school! This is just as fun as factorials! :D
@SPY-ce8qf
@SPY-ce8qf 7 ай бұрын
“Those who stop learning, stop living” great quote and great conclusion
@fatnerd9985
@fatnerd9985 6 ай бұрын
Just graduated year 12 with a growing hatred for learning maths due to the brute forced and completely confusing maths curriculum. Watching this video was genuinely interesting, your passionate and excited explanation of tetration that i was pretty sure i would be completely lost on and click off the video, somehow kept my attention and got me really curious to see this through regardless if i understood or not. Just wanted to take a moment to appreciate this video and the interest it somehow sparked within me for maths, even a slight bit. Also that handwriting is pristine. Keep up the good work.
@pixels303at-odysee9
@pixels303at-odysee9 6 ай бұрын
Try derivatives and Laplace Transforms. Even Z transforms are useful when dealing with sample rates from a computer and systems exhibiting weight, velocity and hydraulic dampening. I love math, but yes, it is very difficult to understand.
@scottbenzing1361
@scottbenzing1361 5 ай бұрын
Do they still teach common core? If so, that's a big part of it and it's designed to hamper people in their learning.
@mrfoobz5709
@mrfoobz5709 5 ай бұрын
@@scottbenzing1361last I heard yeah common core is still a thing unfortunately. Standardized learning to create standardized little workers to fill all the low level vacancies and work 80 hour work weeks for 5 figures a year
@richr6249
@richr6249 3 ай бұрын
Do you people still exist?@@scottbenzing1361
@gplipp6489
@gplipp6489 Ай бұрын
I enjoyed the setup of comparing the infinitesimally large number to the test question. Nice trick.
@taboopancake28
@taboopancake28 Ай бұрын
A staircase of exponentiation... A tool so powerful we don't have many practical applications for it in our universe! Amazing thank you for sharing!
@bryceverleur2884
@bryceverleur2884 7 ай бұрын
I wish teachers did this more often, getting students to figure out how concepts work by providing just the steps grants better understanding
@fullsendmountainbiker5844
@fullsendmountainbiker5844 7 ай бұрын
Trust me it doesn’t work when teaching a class😂 it’s fine for a KZfaq video, but when teaching a curriculum it is flawed. I’m currently studying maths, further maths and physics, and one teacher we have for further mathematics has this approach, and he ends up confusing everyone! Like I said, no problem here, as this is just some fun maths, not too complicated but it doesn’t work at a higher level
@chrish7336
@chrish7336 7 ай бұрын
@@fullsendmountainbiker5844 Yes it does, but at higher levels there is already an expectation of prior knowledge, so some of this can be skipped. Also at higher levels you need to go and bring things back to simple, otherwise you have idiots with so called higher education trying to use Algebraic calculations and rules in basic math using PEMDAS and getting the wrong answer. IE: Confusion, why? because the basics of why are not taught only how and shortcuts. It has to be taught to use the level of math required/needed for the specific situation. Boolean Algebra doesn't apply to everything, but there is a place for it.
@fullsendmountainbiker5844
@fullsendmountainbiker5844 7 ай бұрын
@@chrish7336 yes there is obviously an expectation of prior knowledge, but you can’t assume everyone in a class can just work a challenging mathematical concept out themselves. If I could do that I’d be a genius, and I’d have no need for any education. Don’t get me wrong this kind of teaching works for some topics, but not for others
@mickaelcoulon5604
@mickaelcoulon5604 7 ай бұрын
really happy to find someone actually enthousiatist about teaching math, i never knew i needed you in my life
@jimmysnyder1
@jimmysnyder1 7 күн бұрын
2^2^2 is not ambiguous, but 2^2^2^2 is. Use parentheses to differentiate between (2^2)^2)^2) = 256 and 2^(2^(2^2)) = 65536. The latter is what the lecture is about.
@crowina_nutshell
@crowina_nutshell 6 күн бұрын
In short, tetration is just the base to the power of itself the value of the number in the "exponent". For example, if you do base 4 and the tetration exponent 3 you get 4 to the power of 4 to the power of 4 (4^4^4) which is 4x4x4x4x4x4x4x4x4x4x4x4 which gives you 4,294,967,296 as opposed to 4^3 which gives you 64.
@daveg659
@daveg659 Ай бұрын
My son insisted we leave a comment. He says the answer is 16! He’s got his mind wrapped up in exponentiation and tetration right now. He’s 9
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons Ай бұрын
He's correct. That's impressive 😊
@physicist191
@physicist191 8 күн бұрын
Mofos on KZfaq lying
@H.A.Kingdom
@H.A.Kingdom 6 күн бұрын
​@@physicist191 Jelly boy
@physicist191
@physicist191 5 күн бұрын
@@H.A.Kingdom you telling me a 9 year old boy, the same 9 year olds that watch skibidi toilet and tiktok and Coco melon, learn about tetration?
@Yurilikesm3l0ns
@Yurilikesm3l0ns 5 күн бұрын
that's what you probably watched when you were 9 🤷‍♀️ not every kid watches cartoon's, rhymes, and etc in their childhood. Some watch these kinds of videos for fun.@@physicist191
@nickaos6626
@nickaos6626 7 ай бұрын
bro explained 20 second thing in 7 minutes, what a legend.
@SomeCowguy
@SomeCowguy 6 ай бұрын
This is my problem with the school system and 99% of youtube tutorials
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons 6 ай бұрын
That's why I left the system too.
@QUBIQUBED
@QUBIQUBED 6 ай бұрын
@@PrimeNewtons In "simple" and "not confusing" terms Tetraition is the repetition of the repetition of repeatedly adding a number *or* the repetition of the process of repeatedly repeating the process of addition
@NilsMueller
@NilsMueller 6 ай бұрын
I don't have 7 minutes to spare, please explain it in 20 seconds
@SomeCowguy
@SomeCowguy 6 ай бұрын
@@NilsMueller tetration = bigger numbers scaled up by its scaler
@PERURENJ
@PERURENJ 11 күн бұрын
Thanks for teaching us a new concept and for your awesome teaching performance.
@anidhussain2607
@anidhussain2607 6 күн бұрын
Great point. Don't stop learning. Those who stop learning have stop living.
@nowherenearby9461
@nowherenearby9461 7 ай бұрын
When I was in seventh or eighth grade I had already developed a love and admiration for math, one day I was reflecting about it and asked my teacher: "so there's addition, then multiplication, then exponentiation. is there anything that comes after exponentiation?". To which he replied with a simple and final "no. nothing beyond it.". Well I feel really good now to know I was right at that time and that tetration exists.
@rjtimmerman2861
@rjtimmerman2861 7 ай бұрын
Well if you just define it it "exists"...
@nowherenearby9461
@nowherenearby9461 7 ай бұрын
@@rjtimmerman2861 that's technically right. but who was I to claim having invented anything in math
@rjtimmerman2861
@rjtimmerman2861 7 ай бұрын
@@nowherenearby9461 the same as all inventors, a person with an idea :)
@trafficbyintent
@trafficbyintent 7 ай бұрын
Why isn't this hearted ❤
@SAJe_53
@SAJe_53 7 ай бұрын
So now figure out what's after tetrarion.
@juniocarvalho9883
@juniocarvalho9883 3 ай бұрын
This video was REALLY AMAZING I’m Brazilian so I didn’t understand much, but as mathematics is a universal language it was easy to follow. Your happiness in teaching is contagious, thank you.
@rafaesisimo_h
@rafaesisimo_h 27 күн бұрын
basicamente, oq ele ta chamando de "tetration" é vc pegar um número e elevar ele ao mesmo número, que tbm tá elevado a esse número (repetindo isso o número de vezes do "expoente") Exemplo: ³2 = 2²^² = 2⁴ = 16
@romabaz
@romabaz 22 күн бұрын
Such simple concept with such loooong explanation.
@aishwarya2016
@aishwarya2016 Ай бұрын
This makes me love maths more and more, truly amazing! ❤😊
@jerichojoe307
@jerichojoe307 7 ай бұрын
I Love your Way of teaching. And the smile that is on your face showing how excited you are about The Wonder of numbers. If only more teachers taught this way to get students excited about numbers too, it would be amazing. If you are not or were not a school teacher or college professor, you missed your calling.
@anonym-hub
@anonym-hub 7 ай бұрын
"If only more teachers ..." being excited is not reproducable very often, meaning a teacher may even only be excited the first time teaching, solution: capture the video and show it to next year's students.
@anonym-hub
@anonym-hub 7 ай бұрын
I would love watching years old video that contains an excited teacher, instead of watching live attitude of most teachers.
@ACuriousChild
@ACuriousChild 7 ай бұрын
GOD ALMIGHTY calls everyone where HE needs him/her most!
@johnshaw6702
@johnshaw6702 7 ай бұрын
​@@anonym-hubI went to a new school were I was assigned to a math teacher who let an audio tape and overhead projector teach the class. That didn't work for me at all. When I transferred to another class it was great because the football coach (about 5'4") and the track coach (about 6'8") had combined their math classes and made it fun as well as educational. Just watching that mismatched pair working together was entertaining. 😂
@roshsurana
@roshsurana 6 ай бұрын
nah bruv he took 7 minutes for that shit. Its one thing trying to accommodating but assuming the general audience who watches is THIS dumb that they need 7 minutes for it?
@mrbenwong86
@mrbenwong86 8 ай бұрын
You don't need 10^10billion, 10^100 is already more than number of atoms in the known universe.
@ThatOneProFloppaTheBest
@ThatOneProFloppaTheBest 7 ай бұрын
i used my calculator it answered 1
@Perrigon
@Perrigon 7 ай бұрын
​@ThatOneProFloppaTheBest you did something wrong then. The universe has 10^84 to 10^90 atoms.
@ThatOneProFloppaTheBest
@ThatOneProFloppaTheBest 7 ай бұрын
@@Perrigon no bro, it said 1.00000000E+84
@ZenGodXGaming
@ZenGodXGaming 7 ай бұрын
What r u on
@hycubo
@hycubo 7 ай бұрын
Actually you would need it to be 10^10^x where x is the exponent on 10^x with the number of atoms in the universe for it to be impossible to represent the number of zeros with one atom per zero
@anukhan111
@anukhan111 13 күн бұрын
Teaching such an interesting topic to us with such enthusiasm is fabulous 🤩
@asfasfasfasf124
@asfasfasfasf124 15 күн бұрын
you're a amazing teacher! love your energy! :)
@fluiditynz
@fluiditynz 7 ай бұрын
That was fun. I've long thought that the fastest and most compact way to make big numbers was using a number like 9 to the power of 9 to the power of 9 to the power of 9 So Tetration is simply formalizing a syntax for it. In my example, 4(tetration)9 Or in computer syntax from one of the old languages I used, 9^9^9^9
@nichtrauchervor
@nichtrauchervor 7 ай бұрын
And the number of your base can increase too, so 9(tetration)99 is unimanginably bigger than 9(tetration)9
@RebelKeithy
@RebelKeithy 7 ай бұрын
We can extend the concept even farther. Lets say º is tetration and lets say ~ is repeated tetration, then; 2º3 = 2^2^2 2~3 = 2º2º2 = 2º16 = 2^2^2^2^2^2^2^2^2^2^2^2^2^2^2^2 Which is uncomputably large I tried pluging it into wolrfram alpha and best it could do is say it is equal to 10^(10^(10^(10^(10^(10^(10^(10^(10^(10^(10^(10^19727.78040560677)))))))))))
@joseluiscuervolopez-mora1814
@joseluiscuervolopez-mora1814 7 ай бұрын
Then search grahams number hahahah
@dylandillpickle568
@dylandillpickle568 7 ай бұрын
I went down a bit of a rabbit hole and discovered it doesn't stop with tetration. Tetration is a part of these things called hyper operations and is also known as hyper-4. Apparently someone was insane enough to coin a term for hyper-infinity: Circulation
@Ascyt
@Ascyt 7 ай бұрын
What about the next step of tetration? Like having 2 and 2 be 2 tetrated two times Like 9 (super tetrated) 9 times would be 9 tetrated by 9 tetrated by 9 tetrated by 9 tetrated ... (9 times) lol
@subup4116
@subup4116 3 ай бұрын
Never in my life did I think that I would scroll on youtube and actually watch a video where I would hear something, I have never heard in my life. Tysm for sharing!! It was lowkey bussin
@TelPhi_
@TelPhi_ 3 ай бұрын
fr fr no cap!!!!
@MyOneFiftiethOfADollar
@MyOneFiftiethOfADollar 3 ай бұрын
I would expect a person like yourself to hear something everyday that you have never heard in your life.
@subup4116
@subup4116 3 ай бұрын
@@MyOneFiftiethOfADollar And that's why you're single
@ganyu_literally
@ganyu_literally 2 ай бұрын
You ratioed him 🔥
@Overqualification
@Overqualification 7 күн бұрын
I split it up like this = 2^2 is 4, so i then added the remaining “2” exponent, onto the 4, which is 4^2. So 4^2, is 16. I can’t believe i actually learned a math concept from a KZfaq video this efficiently. Genuinely a wonderful teacher.
@a1productionllc
@a1productionllc 6 күн бұрын
16, of course, since you marked that as correct. Factorials are another kind of number that I have found fascinating. They grow so fast, relating to the base. Have a good day!
@hezuka705
@hezuka705 7 ай бұрын
Nice handwriting
@NotEntirelyStupid
@NotEntirelyStupid 7 ай бұрын
He really does
@mimicreeplayz2441
@mimicreeplayz2441 4 ай бұрын
This man is a legend… still liking comments to this day (Btw the answer is 16)
@raunak_chaudharyy
@raunak_chaudharyy 22 күн бұрын
A beautiful concept explained in a beautiful way . ❤
@sharkdragongaming7508
@sharkdragongaming7508 14 күн бұрын
I found 16 because according to the logic, the exponent before the number means it’s how many times you rise the number by, for instance 3^3 would be 3 times 3 times 3and then 27 times 27 times 27 so you would get 19,683
@DavidChristopherCasey
@DavidChristopherCasey 4 ай бұрын
I love the enthusiasm and simplicity of your explanations. Thank you.
@walksaselk40
@walksaselk40 7 ай бұрын
I haven't used math since they tried to teach me and yet here I am
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons 7 ай бұрын
Lol 😆
@Bloody_Raven_7
@Bloody_Raven_7 Ай бұрын
Really loved this lesson, got to learn something new!
@saviodias3803
@saviodias3803 22 күн бұрын
Really nice to see you hearting our comments even though there are so many. Great explanation btw.
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons 22 күн бұрын
I try 😃
@Lohikaarme1984
@Lohikaarme1984 7 ай бұрын
YT recommended me your channel out of the blue, and i'm so glad it did! i'm promoting TA (Tetration Awareness XD) whenever and wherever i can, tho i fully realise it's not very practical operation. But it's important in its own merit, just to remind us to keep our minds open and always expect something more out of the vastness of mathematics. Keep up the good work man! :)
@NaveedKakal
@NaveedKakal 7 ай бұрын
Is this a widely accepted notation or is there something spicy like a minority trying to push it into acceptance
@Lohikaarme1984
@Lohikaarme1984 7 ай бұрын
​@@NaveedKakal no, i dont think it is. More commonly approved is something called Knuth's up-arrow notation, it's being used to write operations of exponentiation and beyond. Standard exponentiation (let's say 2 to the power of 3) would be written as 2↑3 (it is kinda similar to the 2^3 - i'm not sure if the root of both is the same, but they do look suspiciously similar). Tetration, and any other higher iteration for that matter, would just be written with more arrows in a row. So 2 tetrated by 3 would be written as 2↑↑3. Pentation as 2↑↑↑3 , hexation as 2↑↑↑↑3 and so on. Tho for tetration itself i'm a huge fun of a notation presented in this video, i mean it's just more elegant and instantaneously resambles something related to exponentiation. There are other interesting unorthodox notations out there, like inverted sqrt sign for logarithm, try googling "A radical new look for logarithms". It's just brilliant. I've also come across proposals for trigonometric functions that, instead of traditional sin, cos, and tan, use a representation of a right triangle with only the two sides relevant to the respective operation. So, tan would be written as a horizontal and a vertical line meeting at the right angle, sin as a skewed and vertical line, and cos as a skewed and horizontal line. :)
@RedditStorys690
@RedditStorys690 7 ай бұрын
16, 2x2 = 4, 4 x 4 = 16
@FreeAmericanSpirit
@FreeAmericanSpirit 7 ай бұрын
Why is it not 2x2=4x2=8?
@RedditStorys690
@RedditStorys690 7 ай бұрын
that would be 2 to the 3rd power this is the third tetrate of 2@@FreeAmericanSpirit
@FreeAmericanSpirit
@FreeAmericanSpirit 7 ай бұрын
@@RedditStorys690 you need to explain it better in the vid. All you said was it is a billion for each time you multiple it. So that infers it should have been 8 billion... 2 x 2 is 4 4x 2 is eight that's using the 2 three times.. to get to 16 you have to have another 2. Why is there not a 4 in front of the 2?
@nunyabiz2117
@nunyabiz2117 7 ай бұрын
​​@@FreeAmericanSpirit because the 2*2 is 2^2. So the 4 is the exponent with base 2. 2^2^2= 2^(2*2)= 2^4= 2*2*2*2= 16
@abrahamben-dayan9843
@abrahamben-dayan9843 7 ай бұрын
@@FreeAmericanSpirit Step 1: 2 to the 2nd power = 4. Step 2: 4 to the 2nd power = 16
@ivanthesmash4642
@ivanthesmash4642 20 күн бұрын
Very nice video, and I like your saying "those who've stopped learning, have stopped living"
@LENN_space_sfs
@LENN_space_sfs 14 күн бұрын
Its 2^4 = 2×2×2×2 =16 I learned it in belgian college (to help calculate big numbers) but the notation was different , we used a special combination of exponents and accolades
@mush4ka
@mush4ka 5 ай бұрын
I didn't need to learn this, but I don't regret learning this.
@The_J420
@The_J420 8 ай бұрын
5:56 I think you’re getting confused between the exponents. 10^10^10 has 10^10 zeros, but there are 10^80 atoms in the universe, which is way more than required. If every 0 occupied an atom, a single file of atoms 1 metre long would be enough. I think you thought that the number had 10^10 billion zeros, which is where the confusion came from
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons 8 ай бұрын
I think so, too. Numbers are not my strength 😀
@taktition_
@taktition_ 8 ай бұрын
If you tried to count to the number "ten tetrated to three," and each individual atom in the universe represented one unit of this number, you would run out of atoms to count this number at 10^80, meaning there would be 10^9,999,999,920 units unaccounted for. Ten tetrated to three is an unthinkable amount larger than the universe, which is already an unthinkably large size.
@CatfoodChronicles6737
@CatfoodChronicles6737 8 ай бұрын
To me it checks out. In maths, BODMAS tells you that Order (Exponent) always starts from the highest point. 10^10 equals 10 billion after all, and 10^1000000000 is much bigger than 10^80.
@misikaro
@misikaro 7 ай бұрын
@@CatfoodChronicles6737 But there are "only" 10 billion (10^10) zeros to write. So it's actually an easy task, you need to write only 5 zeroes a second without breaks for 64 years and you are done!
@DefaultMale_
@DefaultMale_ 7 ай бұрын
But 10^10^10 is 10^10b because 10^10 is ten billion
@uzmabilal6313
@uzmabilal6313 Күн бұрын
I had to double check to see if this was uploaded on April fools
@locien182
@locien182 5 ай бұрын
Teachers who teach with passion or excitement help people grasp the subject. You talked clear and to the point in a way that wasn't condescending loved it subbing now
@nexusnexus9221
@nexusnexus9221 Жыл бұрын
2^2^2 = 16. I feel like tetration will be used one day as quantum computers become reality.
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons Жыл бұрын
I agree. I believe it's already being used.
@Catinsuit11
@Catinsuit11 2 күн бұрын
Im actually watching during summer...cause i like your channel man 😎👍
@Warsteel55
@Warsteel55 3 күн бұрын
16 is the answer. 2 squared- 4. 4 squared =16. Thank you for the new knowledge sir! Ive been alive 34 years and you just taught me about something i didnt know existed
@randomshow9366
@randomshow9366 7 ай бұрын
Im studying for my ACT and came across this video. The quote at the end is one that I hope to remember till my time on earth expires. "Those who stop learning, have stopped living." Very powerful and inspirational. Also I love how you teach and your smile and enthusiasm on the topic is very interesting and this is coming from a "bad" student that absolutely cannot stand math.
@tommcwilliams1072
@tommcwilliams1072 7 ай бұрын
If you hate math, you might have been abused. Hint: math is a language, and you're clearly doing just fine with English.
THESE LEGO SETS BREAK THE RULES!
10:45
SpitBrix
Рет қаралды 6 М.
ПЕЙ МОЛОКО КАК ФОКУСНИК
00:37
Masomka
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
NO NO NO YES! (50 MLN SUBSCRIBERS CHALLENGE!) #shorts
00:26
PANDA BOI
Рет қаралды 102 МЛН
Miracle Doctor Saves Blind Girl ❤️
00:59
Alan Chikin Chow
Рет қаралды 40 МЛН
FOOTBALL WITH PLAY BUTTONS ▶️ #roadto100m
00:29
Celine Dept
Рет қаралды 74 МЛН
2D water magic
10:21
Steve Mould
Рет қаралды 398 М.
Numbers too big to imagine
8:02
Digital Genius
Рет қаралды 1,8 МЛН
Why π^π^π^π could be an integer (for all we know!).
15:21
Stand-up Maths
Рет қаралды 3,2 МЛН
Solving a tetration equation
7:17
Prime Newtons
Рет қаралды 134 М.
Hikaru BREAKS 2800!!
10:58
agadmator's Chess Channel
Рет қаралды 10 М.
Russia | Math Olympiad Question | You should know this trick!!
8:01
The Mystery Of The 0th Root
5:33
BriTheMathGuy
Рет қаралды 578 М.
Light sucking flames look like magic
18:05
Steve Mould
Рет қаралды 1,6 МЛН
ПЕЙ МОЛОКО КАК ФОКУСНИК
00:37
Masomka
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН