No he has not replied to my 3 emails:( no resentments I'm sure he's busy

+Faimollah Ashukollah I can respect what u say akhi... It's just that I'm always on the fence with Islam n I wish is wasn't that way! I took the Shahada when I was young n read the Quran n then I started watching David Wood n other enemies of Islam n it affected me... But then I took interest again because of brothers like Imran, but then I always stay hesitant because of people like Abu Haleema n Anjem Choudary n too many people like this n it makes me have doubts if people like u n Akhi Imran is correct or is it Abu Haleema/Barras/Choudary etc? Why do I mention them? Because logically, God must be of infinite qualities n therefore he must be of infinite love n mercy n Shaytan must be of infinite hatred n Haleema paint Allah as a ruthless person who loves to cause pain n anger n I think "if God rewards beheadings torture n misery, then who needs shaytan? What room is there for Shaytan n what makes him evil n God good if Haleema n ISIS is the correct one Muslims?" Imran gives me hope

+God Knows it's very good to see you, brother! I feel like I just bumped into an old friend! I've almost completely forgot about our correspondence! Forgive me that I didn't reply, I only now remembered about it. Brothers like u make me know God/Allah is a God of light n not darkness, hence I feel for leaning toward Allah again... I know well that I'm sounding good natured/hearted YET "flaky"/"whimsical" n I don't intend to! Logic, debate-a talent Allah blessed me with, critical reasoning, philosophy is my passion/hobby, which makes me rather "skeptical" by nature (gift-no blind faith, n a curse-doubts) so have patience w/me. I yearn for Allah, but many "Muslims" (not Islam) turn me off. I will pray tonight! Insha'allah I will be guided! Asalamualaycum'

+God Knows I will frustrate u I assume.. But I assure u my heart is good. I shouldn't steer from Allah because of certain so called Muslims BUT what bothers me is how CERTAIN these so called Muslims r that they r the correct Muslims n I wonder why they so easily n confidently they arrive at their conclusions. I don't know, I will pray about it. Again I appreciate ur patience with me:-)

Marcus King vlogs u a Muslim again yet?

He's Dressed like one 😂

he did study law lol

@@MA-ev4oq he did?

@@pyrogunslinger1877 Yes. In many of his videos he’s said it before, but Alhamdulillah now he’s an entrepreneur

@@bayan2445 mashallah that's great

Hey luffy, could you please take care of isis. Turn gear fourth on them.

hahaha

True

1StraightPath2Islam AKHI... MAY ALLAH GUIDE US ALL...YOU ARE RIGHT INSHA ALLAH... SCHOLAR (SO CALLED) ARE SO QUICK IN GIVING LECTURE AGAINST IS but never raise or left country which bombard MUSLIM SINCE YEARS...IS CAME RECENTLY WHAT ABOUT IRAQ AFGHANISTAN.. LEAVE THIS ENEMY LAND...

DanEraser i been searching for this, im yet to see it

Ameen check my comments and save those notes by clicking newest comments

How

Astaghfirallah, you are emotional.

@toyina kumanya Yes, I did know some of them. They are also all emotional and make up their religion and end up in total exaggeration and isolation. And also, I follow the view that the Khawarijj are not Muslims and that has been the view of the majority among the Sahaba. They also like to do fatwa shopping. May Allah protect you and keep you away from bad things. Wa salamu aleykum wa rahmatullah.

*R u drunk u jaahil? This video saved me from the khawarij ideology ALHUMDULILLAH! U r such a hater and big jaahil!*

*EVERY MUSLIM MUST RESPECT & NEVER PUBLICIZE THE FAULTS OF THE SULTAN MUSLIM RULERS‼️WE MUST CONTINUE MAKING DUA FOR THE KHAIR OF THE RULER EVEN IF HE JAILS ALL THE ULAMA✅️IMAM AHMAD IBN HAMBAL RAHIMAHULLAH WAS LASHED DAY & NIGHT BY THE RULER & THE RULER EVEN CALLED IMAM AHMAD IBN HAMBAL A KAFIR NAOOZUBILLAH✅️HE WAS WHIPPED LASHED IN PUBLIC IN FRONT OF ALL MUSLIMS WHO LOVED HIM THE MOST AS THE BEST SCHOLAR & IMAM OF HIS TIMES!! SOME OF THE MUSLIMS ASKED "YAA IMAM SHOULD WE FIGHT THE RULER BCUZ HE IS OPPRESSING U⁉️" IMAM AHMAD IBN HAMBAL REPLIED "FEAR ALLAH REGARDING YOUR DUTIES & RESPONSIBILITIES TOWARDS YOUR RULER! DO NOT FIGHT OR REBEL AGAINST HIM! RATHER I STILL MAKE DUA HIS KHAIR & HIDAYAH‼️ALLAHUAKBAR☝🏻SO ANY MODERN DAY SITUATION IN THE UMMAH SHOULD NOT DRIVE US BY EMOTIONS TO ACT LIKE THE KHAWARIJ‼️THE STUDENTS OF IMAM AHMAD WERE DRIVEN BY EMOTIONS TO THE POINT THEY WANTED TO ATTACK THE MUSLIM RULER WHO WAS TORTURING IMAM AHMAD IBN HAMBAL RAHIMAHULLAH IN PUBLIC & DECLARING HIM KAFIR!🚷SO IMAM AHMAD WARNED THEM & ALL PEOPLE AGAINST REVOLTING AGAINST RULER IN ANY WAY & RATHER MAKE LOTS OF DUA 4 HIM SUBHANALLAH JUST LIKE THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD ﷺ TAUGHT US!* *I WILL STOP WHERE RASOOLULLAH MUHAMMAD ﷺ SALLALLAHUALAIHIWASALLAM STOPPED!💎🚷HIS TEACHINGS ARE ENOUGH🚷💎IF THE WORDS OF RASOOLULLAH MUHAMMADﷺ SALLALLAHUALAIHIWASALLAM DO NOT SUFFICE U💎I DONT HAVE ANY SOLUTION 4 PERSONAL emotions & opinions!* *I NARRATED THE WHOLE IMAM AHMAD IBN HAMBAL RAHIMAHULLAH STORY & WHAT WAS HIS RESPONSE? PERSONAL EMOTIONS FEELINGS OPINIONS?! 🚷NO🚷HIS RESPONSE WAS GIVE THE RULER HIS RIGHTS & OBEY HIM & MAKE DUA 4 HIS KHAIR & HIDAYAH EVEN IF HE OPPRESSES U!* *وان ضرب ظهرك واخذ مالك فاسمع واطع* *تَسْمَعُ وَتُطِيعُ لِلْأَمِيرِ وَإِنْ ضُرِبَ ظَهْرُكَ وَأُخِذَ مَالُكَ فَاسْمَعْ وَأَطِعْ* *YOU SHOULD LISTEN & OBEY THEM EVEN IF THE RULER STRIKES YOUR BACK & TAKES YOUR WEALTH EVEN STILL LISTEN & OBEY✅️PROPHET MUHAMMAD صلى الله عليه وسلم SAID AGAINST THE KHAWARIJ IDEOLOGY OF REVOLT AGAINST THE RULERS LIKE alqaeda isis etc.🚫REGARDING THE EXTREME SIGNIFICANCE OF OBEYING THE RULER NO MATTER HOW TYRANNICAL & OPPRESSIVE HE IS🌏EVEN IF THE RULER LASHES YOUR BACK & TAKES AWAY YOUR WEALTH, HEAR & OBEY✅️SAHIH MUSLIM 1847 Grade: Sahih* *AwfIbnMalik reported: The Messenger of Allah said* *خِيَارُ أَئِمَّتِكُمْ الَّذِينَ تُحِبُّونَهُمْ وَيُحِبُّونَكُمْ وَيُصَلُّونَ عَلَيْكُمْ وَتُصَلُّونَ عَلَيْهِمْ وَشِرَارُ أَئِمَّتِكُمْ الَّذِينَ تُبْغِضُونَهُمْ وَيُبْغِضُونَكُمْ وَتَلْعَنُونَهُمْ وَيَلْعَنُونَكُمْ* *The best of your rulers are those whom you love & they love you, who pray for you & you pray for them. The worst of your rulers are those whom you hate & they hate you, whom you curse & they curse you* 🚫🌍🌎 *It was said “Shall we confront them with swords?” The Prophet said* *لَا مَا أَقَامُوا فِيكُمْ الصَّلَاةَ وَإِذَا رَأَيْتُمْ مِنْ وُلَاتِكُمْ شَيْئًا تَكْرَهُونَهُ فَاكْرَهُوا عَمَلَهُ وَلَا تَنْزِعُوا يَدًا مِنْ طَاعَةٍ* *No🚫as long as they establish prayer among you. If you find something hateful from them, you should hate their actions BUT NOT withdraw your hand from obedience🌎🌍🚫SAHIHMUSLIM 1855☑️SAHIH* *1. "Go, both of you, to Fir'awn (Pharaoh), verily, he has transgressed (all bounds in disbelief & disobedience & behaved as an arrogant & as a tyrant) AND SPEAK to him MILDLY, perhaps he may accept admonition or fear Allah." [Surah TaHa **20:43**-44]* *2. Invite to the Way of your Lord WITH WISDOM & fair preaching & argue with them in a way that is better. Truly, your Lord knows best who has gone astray from His Path & He is the Best Aware of those who are guided. [Surah Nahl 16:125]*

*_MuslimSkeptic Daniel Haqiqatjou says:“I support Deobandis, they are the real ones. Most scholars are deobandis. I’m a fanboy of deobandis. They are preserving Islam, according to the Salaf(!)” Also DanielHaqiqatjou: “I’m Athari, Hanbali” Sorry, but this man is a deceiver. Daniel is a sympathizer of Khawarij who praises innovators from Deobandi sect upon soofiyyah. Wahdat ul Wujood is one of the worst forms of shirk and this is one of the core beliefs of Deobandis and barelvis. The Ulama of Deoband propogate and defend this kufr but the majority of their public does not know this Aqeedah. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani had the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood as well. Haji Imdadullah Makki is the “Shaikh ul Ulama”, “Murshad”, “Syed”, “Aala Hazrat”, “The Shuyyookh ul Shuyookh of the Mashaaikh” of Deobandis. He writes in Kulyaat-e-Imdaadiya Page 18 printed by Darul Ishat that:“And after this he should be engrossed in the Zikr of HOO HOO so much so that he himself becomes the Mazkoor (i.e Allaah) and this is the meaning of Fana dar Fana. Upon achieving this state he will become a capapie of Noor”_* *DANIEL HAQIQATJOU PRAISED INNOVATORS LIKE SUFI SECTS OF DEOBANDI DEVIANTS WHO HAVE PANTHEISM WAHDATUL WUJOOD AQEEDAH🔥🔥BUT innovators like deobandi naqshbandi barelwi etc. don't deserve any praise no matter how much khair they do or how many huffaz they produce each year! USING THAT LOGIC WE SHOULD ALSO START PRAISING THE QURANIST APOSTATES WHO ARE HADITH REJECTORS BUT "HAVE DONE SOME KHAYR"🔥ALLAH CURSED THE INNOVATOR AS WELL AS THE 1 WHO ACCOMMODATES THE INNOVATOR‼️🔥Let alone promotes such innovators' ideologies or sect or deviated beliefs!*

The Meaning of Tāghūt According to the Early Scholars & That It Does Not Necessitate Kufr in Every Case. The word tāghūt [1] is mentioned in several places throughout the Qurān and its meaning is distorted by the radical preachers to refer to the disbelievers or to major idolatry, and since some of the great scholars mentioned in their writings that ‘the one who does not rule by that which Allāh has revealed’ is a tāghūt, then they conclude that all of the rulers are therefore disbelievers. However, the reality is that the term tāghūt can refer to the unbelievers and to the heads of misguidance from the Muslims. I will prove this from the sayings of the great scholars of the past. Imām al-Jawharī stated in as-Sihāh: “At-Tāghūt: the soothsayer, Satan and every leader of misguidance.” [2] The esteemed scholar of the Arabic language, Ibn Mandhūr stated: “At-Tāghūt: Whatever is worshipped besides Allāh, the Mighty and Majestic; and every leader of misguidance is a tāghūt.” [3] He also stated: “Abū Ishāq said: Everything that is worshipped besides Allāh, the Mighty and Majestic, is a sorcerer & a tāghūt. It is said, ‘[Everything that is worshipped besides Allāh:] the sorcerer, the tāghūt, the soothsayer and Satan… Ash-Shaʿbī, ʿAtā’ and Mujāhid all said: ‘The sorcerer, the magician. At-Taghūt is: Satan, the soothsayer and every head of misguidance.” [4] Imām Mālik (died 179H, rahimahullaah) explained: “At-Tāghūt: Everything that is worshipped besides Allāh.” [5] Ibn al-Jawzī said: “As for at-Tāghūt: it is a term taken from tughyān, and it is to go beyond the set limits.” [6] Regarding the statement of Allāh, “And We sent a Messenger to every nation calling them to the worship of Allāh and to abandon the at-Tāghūt”, al-Qurtubī, the famous Quranic commentator, stated: “Meaning: Abandon everything that is worshipped besides Allāh such as Satan, the soothsayers, the idols, and everyone that calls to misguidance.” [7] And Imām ash-Shawkānī stated the same in his Quranic commentary, Fath al-Qadīr [8]. Ibn Hishām, the writer of the famous biography of the Prophet (salallaahu ‘alaihi wassallam), stated: “At-Tāghūt: Everything that misguides from the truth.” [9] Shaikh al-Islām Ibn Taymiyyah (d. 728, rahimahullah) stated regarding at-Tāghūt: “It is a generic title into which enters: the Satan, the idols, the soothsayers, the dirham, the dīnār (forms of currency) and other than that.” [10] Shaikh Muhammad bin Sālih bin ʿUthaimīn (rahimahullaah) stated: “Ibn al-Qayyim has gathered what has been said regarding it (at-Tāghūt), it is: ‘That which is exceeded by the servant beyond its limit whether it be with respect to following, or worship or obedience.’” [11] The Meaning of Tāghūt According to Shaikh al-Islām Muhammad bin ʿAbdul-Wahhāb It is somewhat surprising that modern-day radicals should attempt to utilise the statements of Shaikh Muhammad bin ʿAbdul-Wahhāb (rahimahullaah) to support their argument since he was from the scholars who consistently warned from the performance of takfīr and from disobeying the Muslim rulers, even if they be from the most tyrannical of rulers, as he has expressed in the famous letter to the people of al-Qasīm, ar-Risālah ilā Ahlil-Qasīm [12]. Regarding the discussion surrounding the subject of at-tāghūt, Shaikh Muhammad bin ʿAbdul-Wahhāb said: “The tāghūts are many, and their heads are five: Iblīs (Satan), may Allāh’s curse be upon him, The one who is worshipped and he is pleased with that, The one who claims anything from the knowledge of the Unseen, The one who calls people to worship him, The one who judges by other than that which Allāh has revealed. And the proof is His saying, the Most High: “There is no compulsion in religion. Verily, the Right Path has become distinct from the wrong path. Whoever disbelieves in at-Tāghūt and believes in Allāh, then he has grasped the most trustworthy handhold that will never break. And Allāh is the All-Hearer, All-Knower.” And this is the meaning of lā ilāha illallāh.” [13] So some may understand from this that the Shaikh is declaring as an unbeliever the one who rules by other than what Allāh has revealed. However, this is not the case for two reasons: Firsty, due to the consensus from Ibn ʿAbdul-Barr who narrated that ruling by other than what Allāh has revealed constitutes minor disbelief that does not exit from the fold of Islām (At-Tamhīd of Ibn ʿAbdul-Barr, 5/74-75), and secondly that the term at-Tāghūt does not necessitate major disbelief. This is made very clear in the following statement of Shaikh Muhammad bin ʿAbdul-Wahhāb: “The tāghūts are many, and the clear ones to us from them are five: The first of them is Satan. The tyrannical ruler. The one who takes bribery. The one who is worshipped and pleased with that. The one who acts without knowledge.” [14] So he considered that from the heads of the clear tāghūts are: the tyrannical ruler, the one who takes bribes and the one who does not act upon knowledge - and these affairs constitute minor disbelief (al-kufr al-asghar) in their origin. Indeed the one who takes bribes is not an unbeliever outside of the fold of Islām by the consensus (ijmāʿ) of the scholars, unless he makes that permissible. So this makes it perfectly clear that the Shaikh and the scholars before him did not restrict the title at-Tāghūt to only the disbeliever, rather the term can also refer to a Muslim upon sin or tyranny or the one who does not act upon knowledge or the person of misguidance who misguides others, such as the ideological heads of the Khārijites. So from this we can conclude the term Tāghūt includes the disbelievers, the heads of misguidance and innovation - so it is not permissible after this clarification to ascribe to Shaikh al-Islām Muhammad bin ʿAbdul-Wahhāb that he declared as disbelievers the tyrannical rulers or those who do not rule by that which Allāh has revealed, using as a proof his speech regarding at-Tāghūt. And the same can by said of the other scholars as I have stated regarding Shaikh al-Islām Muhammad bin ʿAbdul-Wahhāb. ______ 1 Singular: tāghūt; plural: tawāghīt. 2 See Mukhtār as-Sihāh, p. 265. 3 Lisān al-ʿArab 8/444. 4 Lisān al-ʿArab 15/9. 5 Reported by Ibn Abī Hātim with an authentic chain of narration, 2/495, 3/976. 6 Zād al-Masīr, 2/125. 7 Tafsīr al-Qurtubī 10/103. 8 3/161. 9 As-Sīrah an-Nabawiyyah, 3/100. 10 Majmūʿ al-Fatāwā, 16/565-566. 11 Al-Qawl al-Mufīd, 1/10-12. 12 Recently printed with the title Sharh ʿAqīdah al-Imām al-Mujaddid Muhammad bin ʿAbdul-Wahhāb, explained by Shaikh Sālih al-Fawzān. Translated into English with the tile, The ʿAqeedah of Muhammad ibn ʿAbdul-Wahhaab; published by Sunnah Publishing, Michigan, USA. 13 Ad-Durar as-Sanniyyah, 1/136. 14 Ad-Durar as-Sanniyyah, 1/137. Source: AbuKhadeejah(dot)com Ibn ʿAbdul-Barr who narrated that ruling by other than what Allāh has revealed constitutes minor disbelief that does not exit from the fold of Islām (At-Tamhīd of Ibn ʿAbdul-Barr, 5/74-75). The term at-Tāghūt does not necessitate major disbelief. This is made very clear in the following statement of Shaikh Muhammad bin ʿAbdul-Wahhāb: “The tāghūts are many, and the clear ones to us from them are five: The first of them is Satan. The tyrannical ruler. The one who takes bribery. The one who is worshipped and pleased with that. The one who acts without knowledge.” [Ad-Durar as-Sanniyyah, 1/137.] So he considered that from the heads of the clear tāghūts are: the tyrannical ruler, the one who takes bribes and the one who does not act upon knowledge - and these affairs constitute minor disbelief (al-kufr al-asghar) in their origin. Indeed the one who takes bribes is not an unbeliever outside of the fold of Islām by the consensus (ijmāʿ) of the scholars, unless he makes that permissible. So this makes it perfectly clear that the Shaikh and the scholars before him did not restrict the title at-Tāghūt to only the disbeliever, rather the term can also refer to a Muslim upon sin or tyranny or the one who does not act upon knowledge or the person of misguidance who misguides others, such as the ideological heads of the Khārijites.

*_THE KHAWARIJ TERROR!STS NOT JUDGING WITH WHAT ALLAH HAS REVEALED🔥Ismailbin Sad said:I asked ImamAhmad about:وَمَنْ لَمْ يَحْكُمْ بِمَا أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ فَأُولَٰئِكَ هُمُ الْكَافِرُونَ & whosoever DOES NOT JUDGE by what Allah has revealed, such are the Kafirun (i.e. disbelievers of a lesser degree as they do not act on Allah’s Laws✅️Quran 5:44✅️I asked:What is this type of Kufr⁉️He said:The Kufr that does NOT take a person out of the Ummah✅️Swalat Ibn Hani 2/192✅️Ibn alJawzi said:أن من لم يحكم بما أنزل الله جاحداً له، فهو كافر، ومن لم يحكم به ميلاً إلى الهوى من غير جحود؛فهو ظالم فاسق That whoever did not judge with what Allah has revealed arrogantly REJECTING it then he is a Kafir & the 1 who did not judge with what Allah has revealed inclining to following desires WITHOUT REJECTING it then he is an evil oppressive person✅️Zad alMaseer 2/366✅️In the early period of Islam, they declared AliBinAbiTalib to be a KAFIR when he intended to reconcile with Mu’awiyah✅️Ubaidullah ibn Abu Rafi reported:The Kharijites came out against Ali ibn Abi Talib & they said لَا حُكْمَ إِلَّا لِلَّهِ There is no rule (ḥukm) but for Allah. (_**_12:40_**_) Ali may Allah be pleased with him said:كَلِمَةُ حَقٍّ أُرِيدَ بِهَا بَاطِلٌ A word of truth by which is intended falsehood✅️Sahih Muslim 1066✅️Sahih✅️Imam Shatabee said about:وَمَنْ لَمْ يَحْكُمْ بِمَا أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ فَأُولَٰئِكَ هُمُ الْكَافِرُونَ ✅️& whosoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed‼️such are the Kafirun (i.e. disbelievers of a lesser degree as they do not act on Allah’s Laws✅️Quran 5:44 “هذه الآية والآيتان بعدها نزلت في الكفار، ومن غيّر حكم الله من اليهود، ‏وليس في أهل الإسلام منها شيء؛ لأن المسلم -وإن ارتكب كبيرة- لا يقال له: كافر. This Ayah & the 2 Ayat after it were revealed about the KUFFAR & about those who changed the judgement of Allah from among the JEWS🔥It has NOTHING to do with the people of Islam whatsoever BECAUSE if a Muslim even if he committed a major sin, it cannot be said about him that he is a Kāfir✅️[AlMuwafaqat 4/39]✅️Shaykh ul Islam Ibn Taymeeyah said about:وَمَنْ لَمْ يَحْكُمْ بِمَا أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ فَأُولَٰئِكَ هُمُ الْكَافِرُونَ✅️& whosoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed, such are the Kafirun (i.e. disbelievers of a LESSER DEGREE as they do not act on Allah’s Laws✅️Quran 5:44_* *_أن الإمام أحمد -رحمه الله- سئل عن الكفر المذكور في آية الحكم؛ فقال: “كفر لا ينقل عن الملة؛ ‏؛ مثل الإيمان بعضه دون بعض، فكذلك الكفر، حتى يجيء من ذلك أمر لا يختلف فيه”._* *_ImamAhmad was asked about the type of KUFR mentioned in the Ayah of judging & he said✅️THIS IS THE KUFR WHICH DOES NOT take a person out of the Ummah; just as some parts of EMAN are lesser AND the same is for KUFR, until there appears a matter of which there is no difference of opinion in✅️Majmoo alFatawa 7/2541️⃣BCUZ they left the correct way & this has been testified by the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, as the Khawarij interpreted the Ayat with the wrong explanation. This is what innovators do & this is the door through which they enter2️⃣BCUZ they exaggerated concerning the rulings of the Quran & the Sunnah & they exaggerated excessively✅️Ibn Umar on Rebels:The Khawarij apply verses about disbelievers against Muslims✅️AlBukhari reported: Ibn Umar RADIALLAHHUANHU considered the Khawārij rebels to be the worst of Allah’s creation & he said:“Verily they take verses that were revealed about UNBELIEVERS & use them against the BELIEVERS✅️Sahih Bukhari 6531_* *_عن البخاري وَكَانَ ابْنُ عُمَرَ رضي الله عنه يَرَاهُمْ شِرَارَ خَلْقِ اللَّهِ وَقَالَ إِنَّهُمْ انْطَلَقُوا إِلَى آيَاتٍ نَزَلَتْ فِي الْكُفَّارِ فَجَعَلُوهَا عَلَى الْمُؤْمِنِينَ6531 صحيح البخاري كتاب استتابة المرتدين والمعاندين وقتالهم باب قتل الخوارج والملحدين بعد إقامة الحجة عليهم_* *_Imam al-Baghawi (d516 AH/1122 CE) Rahimahullah mentioned in Ma'alim utTanzil vol 3 p61:IbnAbbas & Tawus stated:It is NOT the kufr which expels one from the Religion✅️Rather if one does it then he is a disbeliever, yet he is not like the one who disbelieves in Allāh & the Last Day✅️Shaykh'ul Islam Ibn Taymiyah (d. 728 AH/1328 CE) rahimahullah, stated in MajmuAlFatawa vol 7 p312:Therefore from the statements of the Salaf were:A person can have within him both īmān & kufr" & likewise within their saying: "that one can have within him both īmān & kufr, it is not the kufr which expels one from the Religion." Just as IbnAbbas & his companions (students) stated in regards to the saying of Allāh:"And whoever does not judge by what Allāh Has Revealed‼️then it is those who are disbelievers✅️Quran 5:44✅️They said it means: "They disbelieved with a type of kufr which does not expel one from the Religion" & Ahmad & other Imāms of the Sunnah followed him in that✅️Ibn Taymiyyah also said in MajmuAlFatawa vol 7, p522:IbnAbbas & others from the Salaf stated in regards to Allāh's saying:Whoever does not rule by what Allah Has Revealed, then they are the disbelievers✅️Quran 5:44✅️Whoever does not rule by what Allāh Has Revealed, then they are the transgressors✅️_**_5:45_**_ ✅️Whoever does not rule by what Allāh Has Revealed, then they are the sinful✅️_**_5:47_**_✅️It is:🔥"kufr less than kufr, fisq less than fisq & dhulm less than dhulm✅️Imams Ahmad, Bukhari & others mentioned this✅️IbnTaymiyyah also said in MajmuAlFatawa, vol 7 p350-351:"He could be Muslim yet within him is kufr less than kufr which does not expel him from Islām absolutely, as the Companions said, such as IbnAbbas & others: "kufr less than kufr" this is the saying of the generality of the Salaf and this is what Ahmad and others documented. This is also what al-Bukhārī bore testimony to in is Sahih✅️(Refer to: Imam Bukhari's chaptering in his Sahīh:Chapter:Kufr Towards Spouses & Kufr Less than Kufr.' Al Qādī Ibn al-'Arabī al-Mālikī stated in Fath ul Bārī, vol 1 p83:"The intent of the classifier (i.e. al-Bukhārī) is to explain that acts of obedience are named 'īmān' and likewise acts of disobedience are named 'kufr'. However, when kufr is applied in this instance the intent is not the kufr which expels from the Religion.")✅️A Study of the Tafsir of Ibn 'Abbās: Kufr Dūna Kufr_* *_The best of your rulers are those whom you love & they love you, who pray for you & you pray for them. The worst of your rulers are those whom you hate & they hate you, whom you curse & they curse you✅️It was said “Shall we confront them with swords?” The Prophet said:_* *_لَا مَا أَقَامُوا فِيكُمْ الصَّلَاةَ وَإِذَا رَأَيْتُمْ مِنْ وُلَاتِكُمْ شَيْئًا تَكْرَهُونَهُ فَاكْرَهُوا عَمَلَهُ وَلَا تَنْزِعُوا يَدًا مِنْ طَاعَةٍ_* *_No🔥as long as they establish prayer among you. If you find something hateful from them, you should hate their actions BUT NOT withdraw your hand from obedience✅️SAHIH MUSLIM 1855✅️SAHIH_*

Jazakallahu khairan akhi

@@moeb840 wa anta FajazakAllahuKhairaa

Yes that Jaahil historian Adnan Rashid who united with the sufi ikhwanis & innovators

+God Knows yes, I would love to, but I don't know how to PM youtubers, but I'll try to figure it out

+God Knows hmmm yeah I still can't figure out how to PM a youtuber... Is it because I'm using my cell phone/mobile device? Will it be easier if I went on my lap top (that I haven't used in a long while lol)

Lukeking999@gmail.com... For fear of security I'll delete this email if I get no response after a few days or so. God bless!

+God Knows hey last thing before we talk... I really love this brother, Imran! He beautifully calls my soul to Islam... However, idiots like Abu Haleema make me want to run away from Islam (or better said, Haleema/"al-hyena"'s Islam, not Allahs Islam, insha'allah) faster than I can speak these words! Why do these people like him think God wants him to call people to Islam this way? Doesn't he think Allah wants people to be actually ATTRACTED to Islam? Doesn't Allah want his children to be saved? Yet Haleema portrays Allah (not that this is truth, rather the image Haleema portrays) to be an angry, petty, miserable, ugly dictator jerk! Why would anybody want a God like the one he portrays? Why can't we have more people like Akhi Imran to be giving Dawah, instead of media favorites like Abu Hyena and Choudary? At least Choudary has a sliver of inner peace in him, albeit a false one. Yet Haleema looks so dark, angry, miserable n unhappy n he thinks Allah wants the light sucked fromour eyes

+God Knows oh and by the way, I do completely understand the plight of the Muslims! I love my country (USA) but I hate my evil murderous globalist tyrannical dishonest government who murders the poor Muslims for their natural resources. So my disgust for Choudary, Haleema, Abu Barras (Imran beautifully dismantled him in debate! I loved it!!) is not from an ignorant media portrayed position; i.e. Thousands of Muslims die n nobody says anything and then 100 westerners get killed and the world weeps! No, God knows I weep for all of the innocent victims who die! It's terrible! HOWEVER, if I return to Islam, I EXPECT myself and my brethren TO BE THE EXAMPLE N EXCEPTION TO EVIL! NOT TO BE MORE EVIL THAN THE EVIL DONE TO MY PEOPLE! Why have a "Shaytan" in this world if the Muslims behave like Shaytan? God brings light and happiness and peace! Shaytan brings darkness, misery and pain, no?! SO WHAT THE HELL ARE THEY DOING BRINGING THE WORLD SO MUCH SUFFERING?! It's beyond insanity! 😒

1 found an Isis supporter...

You can write that you found two Islamic State supporters(me included)

Abu Bakr Al Swedi good luck with that lololol

No i mean you said 1 is an Islamic State supporter. And i am also and Islamic State supporter so you can write you found 2 Islamic State supporter

@@abubakralswedi9983 how can u even support them after watching this video smh

?

yes they will go for Jihad, they will not watch the movies of extermination of their brothers in Syria. it's been more than 2 years and Assad kills them and no ones care.

What about the millions that hate isis? or do you only count the people who are with them?

the only ones that count are those people under Assad kill machine, we are safe and knowing nothing about what's happening there, so our feeling doesn't count i think.

Shlomo Shekelstein ISIS are MOSSAD. Why would muslims be supporting MOSSAD agents.There are many Jews who are against Israeli war crimes, and they don't get a voice on mainstream media either.

Your stupid what the hell? What you said makes no sense if you saw the whole video LOL!

Gateway to Islam the video clearly shows us why ISIS is illegitimate and why we should not support ISIS And how does Naseeha (Advice) make him extremist. There was not a single video in his previous channel telling us to bomb places or force our religion upon anyone. Instead he shows us how to stay away from things like relationships, pornography and how to actually give dawah instead of forcing it.

I'm not talking about Imran, I'm talking about a brother who believes ISIS is good and comments on videos like these.

you mean someone with the name I love Allah the merciful supports ISIS? haha should have been a bit clearer there :P

***** No. If there was 'Only Islam' you are calling all Muslims 'terrorists and extremist'. We never made the division, you lot did. There are people who cause terror and people who don't. I know the US and Israel have caused a lot trouble for Muslims especially in places like Palestine but Muslims including me (Excluding the extremist, terrorist ones) have signed petitions and have been in protests to make people on our side and stop the things that are happening in places like Palestine, the message was being heard by people from parliament and all over the world for once but as soon as ISIS does something the media puts the spotlight on you guys showing the terror you lot are causing. This makes everyone forget about what we've done to try stop this and makes their focus go onto you guys. Most Islamaphobes exist because of what you lot do You mentioned Jihad. Just like Imran said, you guys pick out any word from the Quran and throw it out there with no explanations and proof Jihad isn't only about fighting, fighting is not compulsory and is least recommended And if you are fighting you're meant to fight in battles and not kill innocent people who have got nothing to do with the battle, like the kids from the Peshawar Massacre What we have done with petitions and protests would've been enough to stop the attacks and it was peaceful. You guys act like animals, go for the violent solution and make all 1.8 billion of us look like animals. To you and ***** Any reply to this comment supporting ISIS will not be valid until you guys get a legitimate scholar saying that everything ISIS have done including the killings of children, Muslim and other innocent people was allowed.