Actually the enemy , Just launched a Hypersonic nuclear capable mach 13 cruise missile ,that'll disintegrate California, in the time it takes for Americans to nuke a hot-pocket. We're in trouble with this Global deepstate dismantling the infrastructure of the US. Crazy

Trust me they're not allowed to say anything on these videos that are enemies don't already know. And more than likely they're a lie. Most the time they've already got something 10 or 15 years more advanced before they tell you about this stuff. I saw a plane flying overhead in northern Idaho that had the weirdest configuration I ever saw and I never saw anything on that plane until 30 years later and when they were going over what was coming out of area 51 so if they're showing us this they've already got something better.

@@rockcvn71 they've had hypersonic or super hypersonic ballistic missiles in that can go intercontinental since the '60s They do up to Mach 15 and '16. But they're still not big enough to nuke all of California lol. But the ballistic missiles in the 60s can do 15,000 miles an hour imagine what they've got now that they're just not telling us about. I have a friend of mine that did research and missile and torpedo development for the military and of course he wasn't allowed to tell me about a lot of it but he just says you have no idea what they've got because they will never tell anybody until 25 years after it's made. So if you're not military in you know about it it's already outclassed.

So watch your a** mr . Postman

@@cyberneticorganismskynet That's funny coming from a Postwoman.

Goalkeeper !?

Surface Sonar Tech Second Class here...loved the MK 48...

Do you remember the problem the US Navy had with their torpedoes in the first half of WWII? A sub would fire 10-16 torpedoes at a Japanese ship, the torpedoes would hit but not explode. For two years the Navy brass blamed the problem on the submarine commanders. But it turned out the problem was with the fuse. Lack of realistic testing and a reluctance to expend live warshots for stockpile reliability tests left the Navy entering a major war unaware their stock of torpedoes had a major problem. So the US shoots a small number of each kind of missile every year for stockpile reliability testing.

Soldiers are brainless murderers.

@@meddem7060 .....so what country were you a soldier for again? The Liliputian Republic?

Unfortunately it is defeated by rain. Making it impractical for many situations

Lol, yup...I was wondering that myself. If they would've really had something like that back in the day when I graduated high-school, I woulda joined the Navy...(so, are they like the DEA and using drug seizure stuff in performing their duties? Lol...)

IKR?! 🤔

Do the USN even have frigates anymore? I thought you guys relied on the Arleigh Burkes or the LCS as capital surface units almost to the exclusion of other classes like Frigates?

Let’s just stipulate visual accuracy -was NOT this videos long suit. LOL NONETHELESS, 👁 WANT a pleasure yacht 🛥 w/chain gun...at LEAST = 🚫 Piracy 🏴‍☠️ on the Seas!!

I was thinking the same things cause damn this is poorly made

Also why do the engineers look like fo-special forces hahaha

At least I identified the Yacht :)

So, can you tell how the strongest naval force in the world was captured by the Iranian naval forces and cried like five-year-old children?

@@user-sr7cd9nv9h Bit of an exaggeration on your part there but hey, if that's what you need to do to hide the fact that the Iranian forces wouldn't last a day against the West, go ahead.

Not to mention the Zumwalt is basically a failed project. :P

????

Except for the fact that a single US Destroyer can track, target, and destroy 25 missiles simultaneously.

@@TheMikedngb i think it was a joke

Oh , 26 missiles then 😂 thanks loose lips 😂

😂😂😂😂😂😂​@@davidking7222

LOL !, I can see it now, ship lines up shot, rail gun fires, bottom drops out of said ship, ship sinks !!!. All that"s missing from this charade is the Keystone Cops.

@@emscoffee3398 the UK is not developing their rail gun for ship use, they will be land based guns.

thanks for the info comrade ;) loose lips sink ships

The Rail Gun will be deployed on the shores of the UK. If any country tries to deploy attacks this will take away any advantage. Then the UK will be deploying ground based laser systems that will then address drones. The laser system will then also be deployed via C-130 aircraft to patrol. They will have a triple threat of defense. The UK will then be the primary battle station for the upcoming projected initiatives

I live in Essex, about 10 miles from the sea and up the coast from the proving range, and we hear the guns constantly firing during testing. The concussion from the guns could be felt this far away and shook our house, I used to live on the coast itself when I was younger and it was even worse.

Not all volunteers do so to fight.

@@ICU1337 maybe so...but all volunteers know that there's a chance of combat when they do join

@@David-uy4jz *"Our fighters want to kick butts"* _Not all volunteers do so to fight_

hear here! Cheers from USA

Thank you Frank.

@@stevemartinovich ok

Now THAT'S what I call irony

Dudes this guy literally copy and pasted this on multiple videos. He's just trying to start arguments. Just saying. He just copy and pastes this for likes.

It's called sloppy work, carried out by people who have no interest whatsoever - nor expertise - in the subject matter. The sole point of the production is to make space for advertisements and collect the revenues thereof. Steven, I don't think your concerns about the script are going to be addressed. Hiring even a half-way competent scriptwriter would be a stretch too far for these dumboys. IMHO.

Believe me, the government is not being screwed over, WE are. You think Trumps tax breaks were for you? HAHAHAHHAHA hardly. You got an extra teaspoonful while government contractors got millions, billions, even. Some people just decide to stay stupid.

Yeah. Just like your printer is cheap but the ink cartridges are ridiculously expensive.

@@jayfwelter As a small business owner I can tell you for sure my profit ratio was MUCH better under Trump than what ever the Hell Biden and Pelosi are doing and that is a FACT......

​@@CETGale The Orange Turd was impeached and removed as promised. Banned from Facebook and Twitter. Indictments next - from the NY A/G, Manhattan DA, Atlanta DA and DC A/G. The tRUmp Inauguration chairman was just arrested, His CFO was just arrested. Giuliani is about to be arrested. The Dotard's crimes are catching up to him quickly and most of America is loving it.

It is a missile specifically designed to shoot down satellites and long range ballistic missiles in flight. In other words, to go into space. Probably does cost more than it needs to, but that was never going to be cheap.

The deadliest division in the US Military is the 82nd Airborne Division.

Send in the Marines!

We can go back and forth all day long but at the end of the day each branch has its own bad ass s***, each branch has a shitload of kills and all that kind of stuff, but those Navy ships those guys got the widest range of Munitions man those guys are so funded they have no clue the world has no clue a carrier battle group can dust the entire freaking world

Well, except for the 90 or so aircraft on board! But I know what you're saying.

@@nickh5081 and your Assigned Marines who would hold small arms fire drills. But they were primarily in Charge of guarding ordinance especially when being moved about the ship and there was 0 tolerance for crossing perimeter lines . You would be knocked to the deck and / or Then shot if u were to breath wrong. I always say that there are 4 branches of service ,then you have the Marines. To be be a Marine , you have to want to be a Marine . No half step exist , either you are , or you are not. My oldest brother was a rifle instructor at Camp Pendleton when Lee Harvey Oswald and the guy at the tower shooting in Austin, Tx went through training. All 3 had something to do with Texas and excellent marksman. My brother went to the quarterfinals for target shooting.for The 1960 Olympics in Ohio but went out chasing skirts the night before and was a bit off the following morning. Said even those were kill shots. Also aboard ship the Marines were in charge of the brig. Did 3 days bread and water on the Kitty Hawk in 79 on a West-Pac. That was a blast , I tell ya....

@@randycrocker5908 Ship security is no small factor when you have not only thousands of tons of ordnance aboard, but countless top secret gizmos and doo-dads from chips and circuitry to and nuclear warheads! I was stationed in West Germany in the late 80s. I was infantry, but our tasking was to defend the airfield in case of Soviet invasion. Once a year we'd do a major road and rail move to do large scale maneuvers at Hohenfels and in the German country side as part of the NATO wargames. During these rail moves, those of us that drew guard duty were given live ammunition and told, in no uncertain terms, that no one was to board or exit the train during it's many stops (in those days, military trains took last place behind freight and passenger during peacetime - made for LONG train rides!).

@@nickh5081 I bet they were long train rides and knowing the Russians were keeping tabs of your every move.had to give you a warm fuzzy. Live in a suburb of San Antonio ( Military City USA) so I've heard a lot of stories about Germany. If Russia had loaded up East Gernany with a Invasion Plans and such. But a lot of personnel and equipment in a small area would have some B-52 pilots saying thank you. Coming right out of Alaska in conjunction with the Air Force and Navy , Russian numbers could have got evened up quickly. Thank God it never happened. Like aboard a carrier, my chief ( I was aircraft electrician A-7's) said that in a big showdown , we were just a forward pawn , load up the aircraft with armament and get them in the air. With nukes not many have to get through. The carrier would be taken out by a nuke but our strike force would inflict serious damage if just a few got through. Goes back to that warm fuzzy feeling I spoke of earlier. Yeah our side....

@@randycrocker5908 That was always the big "what if...?" Some guys would say "This is all a joke since if the Soviets ever invaded they'd lead the way with tactical nukes, biological or chemical weapons and wipe out the forward airbases before the war even started". My argument was "I doubt it, but if they do you'll be too dead to care. Might was well get ready in case you're wrong and it goes the other way!". Like you said, I'm glad none of us had to be right or wrong! The whole thing seems like a cheesy movie, now.

Oh yeah lol. 400 rounds of 20mm depleted uranium inside you in a matter of seconds is pretty scary.

@@CROPDUSTERB-52 400 of 20mm standard round would have the same effect depleted uranium would be use on "hardened targets" why waste high tech on standard targets

My brother from another mother, 👍🙈🙉🙊💥

says the anti-government terrorist plumber

Peace is cheaper than war. Either way the US DEF budget is way too bloated.

hi A T... ' why complain comment in here about EX - - - - - - -... not impprtant currency

They are only serving the bankers and the military contractors. They are not "fighting for our freedom".

@@MrBernard0911 You have no idea what you’re talking about. Anyone who served knows exactly what I mean. It has nothing to do with what you’re thinking. Only people who have raised their right hand and enlisted can possibly know what kind of bond we have and why we’re serving. It’s got nothing to do banks or governments or anything else you’re referring to.

I’ve been thinking I might enlist

I agree with you. I realized early in basic training that the genius of how the Army trains people is 1) assuming the person doesn't know a damn thing about the subject 2) starting them at the ground-level nuts and bolts scale and working up from there 3) plenty of hands-on experience during the entire training program. As they told us, the Army is going to show you the right way of doing EVERYTHING once. After that you're expected to know it. But when they tell you they're going to show you the RIGHT way to do anything, they aren't joking around. I've always been a talented marksman, but in basic I met no end of guys who were from big cities and had never even seen a rifle up close. Yet within a few weeks their scores were in the same ballpark as the experienced guys like me. You hit on a reason on why I love collecting military field and training manuals. Want to be a carpenter but don't know squat about it? Get the Army training manual. It'll get you from clueless to competent in a very short period of time. Same goes for just about any other MOS specialty, from wilderness survival to "combatives" to cooking. I would never claim to be a competent medic but when I was doing police work I got and studied the training manuals the Army uses for medics (it's not a pleasant experience watching someone bleeding to death and not know what to do about it), and that and a medical kit in the trunk allowed me to help a lot of injured people before EMS could get there. I love the field manuals and I have entire gigabytes of field and training manuals from both US and other militaries around the world. The vast majority of such things are in the public domain and easily available online from numerous sources. They're a wonderful resource.

@@josephledux8598 Learning to accurately fire a modern rifle is ***EASY***. Barrels are precision made. Ammunition is high standard and reliable. All a soldier needs to learn is judge distance and what angle is needed to account for gravity induced fall of the bullet during flight. I know cuz I was there.

I was head tech of the MK 38. I liked 5 inch more lol

The Bush gun is mounted on the Bradley seen lots of action .

What do ya expect out of a single, unemployed, middle-aged, virgin that's still living in mommy n daddy's basement and suffering from a KZfaq fetish lol? One can't survive on just "trolling" alone...(easy you motards who just happen to be that very same person described...it's just humor...you don't have to be a "virgin" for your whole lives. It may cost you some money, but you don't have to be one forever)

@@drew65sep What you've stated makes you the epitome of a Troll. Go back to Facebook for your LIKES. This is an actual conversation.

@@drew65sep realy want it to cost you some serious money? MARRY one! 😂

Alright! Here comes the war engineers that have more knowledge about warfare than the war engineers in US itself. LMAO

HMS vessels? Do you mean America's little poodle vessels?

Honestly😂

Rubber bands and paper clips.

You'll shoot your eye out!

….loaded with depleted uranium BBs of course!

You just need a weapon with a big enough punch, that when you miss you hit.... Like the 16 inch .50 cals on the New Jersey.

Nope. not cheap, not sustainable, one shot and sail away.

Whatever happened to the "patriot" missile?

6 Ujjain

Sm3 at 18 millions each missile is freaky expansive

Countries already have nuclear missles. Everything else made are just an advantage to not use nukes.

Sure they figured it out....scrape the project why the navy announced it awhile ago

"A problem I don't know can ever be fixed, honestly." As a retired engineer, I can honestly tell you, it's just a problem. The technical aspects will be resolved. But usually it's the financial question, "How much do you want to spend to get the answer?" that will shut the project down.

I thought it was the price of the shells.

@@justintime41776 You're thinking of the Mk 51 guns for the Zumwallt class destroyers. Those guns actually worked, and were installed on the ships they were designed for. But the special amunition costs a milliom buks a round, so the navy is replacing them with more missiles

@@chuckdargy5031 Even if a rail gun could only fire about 20 projectiles before refit/repair, a weapon the size of an MK82 with a range of five miles and the destructive power of a howitzer would be a weapon would carrying in a platoon. What is needed is the maturation of the carbon capacitor super battery to act as the energy source. All this is doable.

Not taken into account is China's NAVY... Newer and bigger

Entire movie is random mash of stolen videos and bullshit talk.

@@seahippies Bigger is true, as for newer.... ha

@@seahippies China is a joke with no experience in the field.

Yeah, sorry OPSEC, what we really have now are not allowed in public. And yeah, I am older Navy and was a Seabee. Got to tour a FFG when I went to 2nd class leadership school in Evert Washington, only time I have ever been on a ship.

The only issue I see with light weapons is their range during poor weather conditions. Seems like heavy clouds, fog and rain would severely limit their effectiveness.

tracking / targeting tech a challenge for hypersonic nonlinear maneuvering. the new weapons don't fly in straight ballistic trajectories.

Biggest, NOT the best! Not by far....

@@markevans6231 Who’s the best?

@@denysecoop7356 Royal Navy, obviously!

@@markevans6231 LOL! I’m not going to argue with you on that… I think you’re both great😎

@@denysecoop7356 true, but we are better..... 👍

what they tell the public and what they actually do are vastly different

@@nomercyinc6783 actually I was corrected by a person that was on the project because I thought it was the energy cost of firing the railgun as to why it wasn't worth it. I stood corrected.

If the weather is cooperating.

you are full of it, if God forbid that takes place, I would suggest google Satan 1 and Satan 2 missiles and see how safe you are dummy and it is ridiculous, all that money for one missile to kill each other, what happened to United Nations? after WW2 ? people are dying from stress and no jobs and we give tax payers money to these companies charges 10 times the price. and create wars and conflicts to make sure we make more to make them richer, and ultimately one day we wipe ourselves out of this World, so to this saving the World crowd, forget saving the World , World is going to be here maybe 100 million years more it is us needs saving from these weapons and greedy evil man and ignorant us gives them the power .

@Sir Hamsterlot Please do more research, if you put nukes aside the US could tactically defend itself from the world, plus its got a population that has more guns than some countries armies, and its got enough resources in its boards it could survive much longer than any other nation. Heck the USN could defeat most countries by itself.

1.25x is kino.

Nuclear ...... nu clear..... nuc lear..... nuc u lar..... someone make up their mind. Are all acceptable?

@Michael Mitchell Now Mick, how many replies to comments have you seen today from Wild Iron? Also if you have compliments for the chef, maybe you should have led with them. Coming in late seems like an afterthought. If you are in verbal conversation with someone do you continually correct their pronunciation or grammar? Probably not. It's the same here mate. Leave it alone eh?

Now imagine what they DON'T let the civilians know about!

They developed the Stealth Fighter in the 1970's ( Hav Blue ). They had already been in operation when they were unveiled in the 90's. What they let us know about is ancient tech by technology standpoint. Remember Reagan's Star Wars program in the 80's for developing directed energy weapons? Are we still to believe weapons like lasers have to this day not been perfected and deployed?

Lets just hope they sort the kinks out.

Given the information we have available to us which was the rail erosion, are we to believe they sunk all that money and time into R&D of this weapon just to cancel it?

@@TwentytenS4B8 It's happened plenty of times before. Look up the Sergeant York antiaircraft system fiasco.

@@Rockit- Program cancelled. Kinks unfunded. Try again when tech improves...maybe.

@@twhite5085 sure, just love the technology- really do hope they get a work around

And power supply

All gun barrels wear out, at both the "throat" end, immediately in front of the breech, and, then at the muzzle, the friction of the projectiles, combined with the heat of the nitrocellulose powders just eats them up, after 5,000 to 7,000 rounds fired. With a rail gun, firing a projectile at, 1.54 miles per second, it's no wonder that the rails erode after only a few shots, consider that the video explained that most projectile rounds vaporize in the gun. 1.54 × 60 = 924 miles/ minute ! That's fast !!

Navy announced a few months ago they were scraping the rail gun so it shouldn't even be on here

I think 8 shots US navy cancelled their program, army and air force are still testing theirs at WSMR

@@chrisgarcia2109 Keep me updated if you hear anything new about this...

@@jamesreney2210 Part of the rapid erosion is also due to some of the rail vaporizing due to mega amps of current flowing through them. I'm not at all sure that our state of metallurgy has any solution to this persistent problem. Time, of course may tell.

By the time these systems hit yt everyone who wants to knows all about them.

There is nothing classified in this.

They only show what was originally made public. Nothing classified is disclosed here such as full capabilities of the weapons, which ships have them deployed on them, max range, power requirements, etc. No OPSEC was harmed in the making of this video.

@@TwentytenS4B8 on

They don’t work well in inclement weather.

I think you missed the guns that can fire a couple hundred miles.

This is aging questionably.

@@etherealswordsman3214 Oh man you beat me to it!

@@McCracken216 lol

Yeah, I'm definitely going to take a USN carrier strike group in every single imaginable scenario. Russian has proven they can't even defend their flagship against two missiles; 12,500 tons or so to the bottom of the Black Sea and hundreds of million dollars worth of Russian crap. We definitely don't have ship-based artillery as effective as Russia's, but they wouldn't get even remotely close enough to their target before a swarm of attack jets and anti-ship missiles come at them hundreds of miles over the horizon. The investment in jets and ships has been made at extreme costs, so utilizing expensive missiles is still just change in the proverbial pocket related to overall expenditures. Ukraine is invaded and the US allocates $13b in aid. That number alone, without any other NATO aid, is double the annual Ukrainian military expenditures. Finally, the laser mentioned in the video is true. There's a second more powerful prototype currently deployed with video showing it actively targeting missiles and drones and a well-placed beam may even be able to cripple some components of enemy aircraft (such as damage to their sensors). The cost is approximately $2 in energy generation. Also, keep in mind NATO partners do have some amazing assets in their military forces, including ships with rapid-firing 105mm gun turrets which could lay down some bombardment as needed, but only with the security provided by the remainder of the fleet and their aircraft/drones. Not only do I have 100% confidence in the US's ability to take on Russia alone, especially since we have no interest in invading and keeping their territory, so NATO would be on the defensive side and picking their hits to their forces and infrastructure on NATO's schedule as weaknesses appear. This video has another error too, calling a Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) a corvette and some other relatively minor things, but it's just strange to have many details correct and other simple details very wrong.

Cheaper is not the primary criterion.

Dominant right now, lets see for how long. The British had far greater control over the world with her Navy which was by far the best at the time. Either way, I do hope the U.S remains the best for as long as possible... Red white and blue..

@@alanandconnielast UK is little baby to compare with the USA. UK = 65 million people, and USA 340 million.

@@georgecoman5342 The US is larger than Europe so that is going to be the case. A small island like that though still invaded almost every country on earth and defeated every known power at some point. Controlled the world as the worlds strongest superpower to a point where the U.S have never seen control before. The UK did more and lasted for just under 200 years - It was two world wars that was to end her control over the world and the price of victory. And the UK is smaller than many states, if the U.S were the same size as the U.K, she would not even be a top 5 power which the UK is even with her small peace time military which is the best trained Army in the world to date as they went small but highly trained. RMC- SAS- SBS. Not much comes close. The UK is still one of the strongest military powers on earth with that tiny population. Only the U,S will match her on the Sea. Any other country would need a great deal of numbers. But you are right, the UK military, as strong as it is and believe it's powerful, it was the second strongest global power in the world before China over took them recently, she still belongs to the U.S. The U.K military is designed to merge into the U.S military these days as they share the same interests. There are superpowers, regional powers, and global powers which have the ability to protect hard power anywhere around the world with speed. Anyways, it's all pointless anyways, conventual warfare is obsolete, if we get into a major war, it would go nuclear so what does any of it matter these days.

@@alanandconnielast You living in the past wtat is history. Only 77 year's back Hitler have you for dessert :) Who save you ??? If you ar so great ??? :)))

@@georgecoman5342 That's not the just the past - The UK have better training and a better military to date. The U,S does not have the best military you clown. She has the numbers and a well trained military with large spending capacity making her more powerful. Actually it was the British who were the firs to defeat Germany with the battle of Britain, Britain saved Britain. It was the British who had the larger forces during D day, it was the British sortie tanks that actually gained the victory and did the most fighting which the Yanks got pined down and lost most of there tanks. The British commonwealth troops outnumbered U.S forces and it was the British that had the larger naval force in Europe and provided the U,S which much of her supplies. Oh and guess what, it was the British that beat Germany North Africa. It was Britain who was fighting Germany, Itialy and Japan alone until you cowards were attacked and forced into a war which would have consumed the free world if the British fell. The U.S did the least fighting, they helped mostly with Aid, Russia and the British did the fighting for the most part, the U.S joined in once most of it was over you clown. Without the British defending the free world, the US would have fell. The Only reason she got on top was because of the worlds powers wiping each other out. It had not even been 80 years out where the U,S got on top and she's already in decline and the U,S needs to be larger than Europe to be any good. Even if the UK went to war war with the U,S today, the UK would get nuked off the map so save the empty pride. What a moron you are, you have no education, your are a child playing ego games, clearly, the type of prick who gives decent Americans a bad name, just keep that shut you clown, you do not know what you are talking about. Time for you to go on the ignore list and you a moron.

Get them trained by Australians, fed less, dressed for the job, and teach the poor bastards the times Table.

I read it