No, AI won't replace art because rich people will still want something unique and can pay for something not made by a machine.

No, Ai doesn’t have the human spirit or their unique life experiences. It just copies from humans.

If anything it’ll raise the value of human art

In the 1960s, after the invention of the Moog synthesizer, there was some worries of the synthesizer replacing all musical instrument and even musicians. This fear grew until the 80s and then just faded. Over 4 decades later, people still make music with conventional instruments; even reviving old instruments (like the mandolin & the harpsichord). And people to this day are still paying to see musicians play theses instrument. The synthesizer never replaced anyone or anything; only supplemented. So I don't believe artists & art lovers need fear anyone or anything being replaced by AI art.

Humans have been painting/creating art since we lived in caves. The oldest cave painting is appx. 64,000 years old. Thousands of years has passed, countless tech innovations have been created from printmaking to photography to computer software... yet humans are still painting and creating art.

Art you buy is art you like, all art is you. It’s the mirror image of your like

AI is pushing the legislation around art ownership more than it is pushing the medium or what it is to be an artist. AI, Photo Editors and Cameras are all tools. Collage artists use clippings from magazines. Are they just crafters or artists? Do they have a claim on the resulting work or should they credit the creators and owners of the pieces they clipped up and pasted together? Here's my final take: The more we automate the more value there is to the hand made. Think about the meal you last ate at a quality restaurant then contrast it with the last time you had a genuine, quality, home cooked meal made just for you and then compare them both to a fast food lunch you grabbed between classes or on your work break. There is value in each and a place for them all in our society but I'm sure most reading this will pine for that home cooked meal that their nana would make just for them. Love you, Nana.

IDK... I am a digital artist, and I still like doing everything _"Old School,"_ such as starting from scratch, shaping everything piece by piece, layer for layer, and then doing the perspective layout (if any), then finally the lighting/texturing effects... Most don't go for that because of the work involved... They want just a couple of "pull points", enter in a few number values, and everything is complete after that!

I think it will be the same as a movie vs. theater competition. AI will definitely kill art, but in what sense? Did a movie kill a theater? Well, no, but actually yes.

Did you write the script for this video using AI? 😂😜

All I can say is my art sales dropped to near zero once Midjourney and Dall-E became widely used. I can't say for sure that AI alone caused my sales to crash to nothing but it must have been a factor. I used to sell paintings every month, this year I've sold two. I've come to the conclusion that art is now only a hobby, nothing wrong with that I guess but I have a hard time being motivated to make art solely for myself, maybe that's a sign I'm not really an artist anyway.

You asked the important question up front: how can we tell the difference between art and junk when we don’t even know what art is? Current society has strayed so far away from art that it’s no longer taught in some schools. There’s less of an appreciation for it compared to things that are logical algorithmic, formulaic, and conforming. Btw that’s what AI does. Take input and spit it right back at us. Fulfilling expectations, solving an equation or following formulas. No matter what the AI peeps tell you, there’s nothing truly creative about AI art. And since we as a society don’t value art like our ancestors did, a lot of us would favor the “style” of AI art over human art. So if you want to change that, teach more art in school.

When it gets going the only barrier is going to be the computing power of machines. I think more artist should forbid their unique style being borrowed or fed into into these AI programs.

I'm not rich. I buy from local artists. Human ones. And I would boycott any museum that displayed AI "art".

I fucking like Ai it helps a lot with lot of things related to concept and design, then here you are the artist to decide what fit your picture or not

So fucking ironic that this video is voiced by AI and no one got it.

I mean referencing photography is not cheap and referencing modern artists is unethical, but refurbished ai art seems more chill to use

Cattle Decapitation : Scourge of the Offspring is an AI music video

Did you see the last Years if Bienale of Venice? Did you see recently some Galleries from New York or other cities? Garbige!

Jamais ! C'est le seul domaine qui n'a de limite que l'imagination, et l'IA n'en à pas. On s'en servira, on exposera, on se fera avoir, on aimera surement ça, mais elle ( l'IA ) ne captera jamais tte la subtilité de la créativité qui nous caractérise.

the coypright is an issue but not so the result. no reason to call this not art. just has to be clear that the art in that case is AI generated and also how to follow routines established by humans

It looks like things happened to interpreters, Iwas an interpreter, a good one. Translated from chinese to english and backwards. Like twenty years ago i was pretty sure, just like you are that machine will never able to understand human's speach and language. Did it fully understand, id say no. But when a guy has an option to get good for nothing or perfect for pretty high. Will you guess what majority will choose. For the moment i did not have any practise in the English language for almost a decade. 2 decades ago i was sure that i will never be replaced. For the moment i work as an engineer for nearly 7 years. If a you are top 5% or so percent probably you will find a way to stay in a game, if not, then start looking for another job.

There is so much bad art that even ai seems good

photography already killed art

No. Art is a commodity, and collected by rich people often with the inevitability to be sold. A human created art work has an element of scarcity; the artist produces a limited number of works in their career until they die, were the supply of new work stops, their prices start to sky rocket. The element of supply and demand. The rich will continue to invest in traditional art due to its historical and cultural significance, the prestige associated with owning original artworks, and the potential financial returns. The market for traditional art may adapt and evolve with the changing times, but its enduring appeal and value are likely to persist for a long time.

some instagram Ai account so good

AI lacks the purpose and sentiment that an artist attaches to an artwork. Doesn't necessarily mean it's not 'art' but it's certainly closer to 'junk'.

When you ask if AI can make art on a computer, shouldn't you also ask if smooshing colored oil on a surface can make art?

I’ve also been thinking about the potential risks and benefits associated with AI's future development. If AI had a hormone system on par with humans’ and were to develop the same level of emotional cognition as humans, it could potentially rival or surpass human artists, although the extent to which it might be developed in the future remains uncertain. Nobody can predict its future trajectory accurately, because AI technology is continuously advancing as we speak. I once read a Korean fictional story about this AI-installed car that, sinking into deep depression, decided to commit suicide in a car crash. 😒 It seems that the car learned to experience and understand emotions from its owner; its interactions with its driver must have ignited a spark of creativity within it. This creative machine seems to have been too honest about its feelings or maybe too overwhelmed by them to endure the depths of depression..😁 I really hope it’s just a novel.

Yes probably

Ai will make art more accessible and help artists create more of what they want. Ai art is a new medium.

I was just going to say this video was made by AI...at least the last section....because the sign off sounded disjointed

Irony of AI voice ....

Ai art isn't art because it's missing the soul. A machine doesn't feel anything while creating thus it's "art" can't convey real emotions, when art is all about feeling something.

No. AI will , I think, be used in marketing, film , advertising. Seems like a contradiction but I think, A I will be applied where cost is a factor . A Picasso or Dali will still require a person. There can be a merger between AI and artists like Hollywood uses CGI today. We still pay to see movies and some movies produce great value to people.

Meanwhile, the narrator is AI 😂

jesus... even this YT video is AI!

I think it´s important to tackle what "art" means. In my case, I ONLY buy handmade art, especially one with a technique that takes several months to make, thus I am not that happy with some contemporary "artists" either. AI scares me... it could get out of control, and also because if it´s affordable, the mass might accept it just like they did with white walls and Ikea furniture =)

TV haed art

God no! XD AI art is too terrible to replace any human artist. In fact, the very idea of AI replacing artwork is dystopian and shameful. Humans experience true suffering and passions, peace, love, turmoil, and triumph on a level that a machine just simply can't conceive. In fact humans are able to conceive abstract things (like in Shakespear's quote from Romeo and Juliet's quote "She is the East, and Juliet is the Sun.") This quote and metaphor is a completely abstracted idea and concept that robots are unable to be programmed to understand how to work properly. It's like that with paintings and any man-made artwork as well, there's a psychology behind it that a robot can't understand due to it being outside of their ability of knowing.

AI art is at best design but it’s not art because there’s no soul behind it, that’s my opinion

Of course Ai art will kill traditional art. Technology can't be stopped. I cant even paint stick figures, but I can do magic with Midjourney. So, yeah, adapt or die. No one is gonna cry for you.