PUTIN IS BLUFFING.

Kansas? Oh wait that's midwest

what country is that?

@@CyrillicTM 🇮🇱

The Israelites

@@CyrillicTM Israel

Interesting, would also like this cleared up

just a small anthrax biological weapons program possibly!

SHEFA-2 submarine cable between Shetland and Orkney was damaged.

Maybe it was about scotlands independence, since schotland hosts an important military base for NATO

Exactly. We all know that was an American CIA false flag operation.

Her "insight" can be found on CNN...

I found some of her insight interesting and compelling. Then she drops a few things like this and reveals her belief system. Then there is her continued framing that Putin is always escalating - and not the people blowing up pipelines.

You know that big bs lies is coming, when someone mentions novichok. After that no sense to continue watching

We've found the Moscow disinformation account hangout, ladies and gentlemen.

It's not WW3 when it's a single country getting ganged on.

@@ChucksSEADnDEAD Which single country? Was it Pakistan on India? Most of Asia versus Japan? "World War Middle East"? Or maybe you're talking about the all out war between US/Canada/Europe and Russia, China with some surprise guests? Seems like everyone is setting up the fireworks factories again. Guess we'll have to remind ourselves through extremely painful methods why war is worst.

@@lostinbravado why would China go to war together with russia? what would be the benefit for China?nPutin didn't even tell Xi that he was going to invade Ukraine

thank you, if you ever need a friend, I'm here.

yea, because you Americans are totally ok with what you have done, so you don't even bother to discuss the atrocity that you committed against innocent Japanese.

There is a large debate ongoing about it even still. There are plenty of KZfaqrs and people still bent out of shape about it. Most, if not all of the people upset by it still, did not live through that time of human history. Until we've invented time travel, the best we can do is put our best foot forward. Do business and treat people equally, at least when they treat us equally. When they seek to do harm, return it in kind. It's petty as hell, but if the world's human-loving communists continue to refuse the US the ability to conquest and expand their borders and influence abroad, then don't expect the US to allow Russia, China, and the temperamental Kings and Queens of Europe to do the same. The sun certainly did rise over Japan. You can thank their god-king emperor at the time, and the runaway Japanese military-industrial complex for that. It's only fair that you reap what you sow. Unfortunately, our communist friends in mainland China seemed to have forgotten the sacrifices of the US in the war in the Pacific. That's a shame too, because their military will most likely draw from the US's island hopping campaign for inspiration when the time comes, if they aren't already. Same goes for the Russians. We supplied mass quantities of military material to them in the second world war. We fought hell as allies to end the Nazi's reign of terror. We did it the old-fashioned way, that was before you could disappear entire cities with one bomb. I'll be curious to see the end result of a nuke used in Ukraine. I expect Russia to retain their use to Ukraine only, as Putin loves his thinly-veiled copy of capitalistic America in Moscow. He wouldn't wan't that to be radioactive glass, just like I wouldn't want NYC to be either. He might not like watching his entire air force and Navy be eradicated by the US military and NATO, but his beloved mansions and estates will remain just fine. So long as he keeps his nukes in Ukraine. I expect the US to let him and his regime continue on living, but the Russian Federation's ability to project military power and wage conventional war will be virtually non-existent after a stunt like that. Outside of nuclear weapons, obviously. But what good is a weapon that you cannot use? Right comrade? Don't forget about the nation who bankrolled multiple nations during the second world war, and fought on two fronts, and birthed atomic weapons. That was an American communist who did that last thing by the way. I find that funny.

@@User-jr7vf They attacked us. See the difference there?

Inncent Japanese?? The allies realised they would have suffered half a million casualties and four million Japanese deaths if they invaded Japan, so dropping the two nuclear bombs actually saved lives!!

@@jdocean1 true, they attacked you and that was unacceptable. But that does not justify obliterating cities full of women and children who did not push for a war with you (I bet most were even unaware of the plans for an attack against the US).

Exactly. Lex has had a few propagandists on, and it’s sad to see such a bright mind befuddled in this way.

​@@timothymusson5040 Lex is just getting past of his conservative mindset after being appalled by Ye. How you define bright minds is laughable.

She's a lying bint

Lol ya I keep seeing people saying that she’s some brilliant truthful intelligent speaker and I don’t get it. She seems to just be a talking point and omit a lot of variables. She speaks well for sure but in circles like a politician

Good angle 👌

@Benson Arguably most of us aren't, and yet here we are all the same a couple world wars deep walking a fine line towards the next.

@Benson it's sad the ones at the top are the ones who think and act liek this

I'm from australia, we gave up our guns, we're fine. I can walk in any neighbourhood, the sketchiest places, i can go anywhere and not be afraid because i know there is zero chance of being shot or held up at gunpoint. It's great.

If you identify yourself as a country...

@@nothingburger1 Australia has 3.5 million legal guns and probably 500 k illegal guns have a nice walk

@@nothingburger1 Your entire country was used as guinea pigs for lockdowns. They got away with authoritarian conduct because you have no guns to fight back. Your entire country is 1 step away from reverting back to a penal colony.

@@nothingburger1 Australia is a totalitarian police state where the police will come to your door and arrest you for wrong think.

Everyone is biased, if she freely admits it then that's not really important, thats just honesty. If she operates from a stance of "unbiased" then she's ret4rded.

Yeah, she’s also trying to sell her ideas too much and some of them dont even make any sense.

You'd "Unlike" her real quick if you watched her congressional testimony during the impeachment shams... total CIA Operative...

@Crypto Care Bear lmao yeah absolutely 🤣🤣🤣

@Crypto Care Bear it was the "Canadian Republican" that got my attention... 🤣

@Crypto Care Bear I've been accused of worse

Yeah it was the right choice. Cheers to the US government and the people behind the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombing. Outstanding job

Factually untrue.

Probably the fear of the quickly approaching red army was the biggest factor. Back then, if a German soldier had had the choice between being captured by American or Russian troops, there's not much to argue about whom they would have chosen...

This is the excuse the Americans love to give as to why they went ahead with the mass killing of innocent civilians. I don't blame you "Ifa feller", they probably taught you in school that the atrocity is totally justified.

On the other side of the world i.e outside of Usa people are saying that Japs were already surrendering and were already defeated but still one country still wanted to show Russia their self proclaimed might and drop the atomic bomb

We fight from the bacterias to the stars. We found the power of our bricks. We use it in two ways. Destruction or energy.

Nukes save lives, it’s really that simple

Life is pain, and then you die. Nuclear arsenals and warfare is irrelevant to this fact.

As they say - "Well constructed question, already contains at least the half of the answer in it..." in this case, the answer is - Not everyone wants to be a common person...

DEFINITELY

that's why I get all my info from this bum that lives in an alley near me

@Benson the west's system

@Benson level up then we'll talk

@Benson if you can't understand my sentence, that's your fault, not mine

But Donald, he doesn't care. He's in an all or nothing position

Bro if Putin uses just one Nuke the whole world is going to end. Nukes will be flying all over the place

NATO will never respond, because if they do, Russia will nuke every Nato nation. Nobody wins if NATO attacks.

@@jimj2683Nato has been mapping nuke sites in russia for decades. They know where the russian submarines are at all time. They wouldnt use conventinal weapons but tactical nuclear ones at specific places. This russian leadership know.

Both points you made are nonsense. 1st point is wrong cause fallout is non relevant factor when using tactical tactical nukes. He wont use tsar or cobalt bombs. 2nd point is only a true idiot thinks NATO is engaging Russia directly to save some trivial irrelevant nation. And every nation is irrelevant when it comes to avoiding full nuclear war. China wants to attack USA, mkre and more nations in EU are against USA and globalists world views . So i would not want to be USA in any way shape or form in this day and age. Propaganda you regurgitate is one thing , reality is another. Im almost wanting for ww3 to start just to be able to see the faces of morons that think NATO is this magical force that will save them. If you are a nation with no nukes, and member of NATO, you would get nuked and no nation in their right mind would help you by retaliation. Its just common sense that most americans don't have.

Yea I am sure in his entire country... no one could have come up with - ideas!

@@JB-iz8tf yeah it’s crazy to think his own people didn’t come up with it. Crazy days

I am sorry. Was the question too on the nose for you? The title is relevant. Don't be afraid to have conversations about potentially "sensational" subjects...

What's wrong with the title? It's asking a genuine question for something that has a higher than negligible chance of occurring.

@@03chrisv right, but she doesn't answer the question. As is usual with these vides, the titles are designed to attract the viewer attention by posing questions that many have an interest in knowing the answer to, even though the question usually can not be answered in a direct manner. But the idea is to get people to click on the video. That's all.

@@User-jr7vf she actually spoke as to what she thinks Putin is going to do, when anyone who thinks, knows it’s hard to say give any precise on measure on what someone will do next. One step further is true clairvoyance.

No, he hired someone to do video editing and upload. There are worse titles made by this guy, like "What men really want", "Why do women cheat". Not to mention all the irrelevant and wild thumbnails. I think it really stigmatizes Lex's name. But well, it's for the views and revenue.🤷‍♀

This is how you scare people into turning off their brains, and leave yourself the technical out of “I never said that”.

This is not yes or no question

If you listened to any of the response, you’d realise A) if it was a Yes, Putin would’ve used it by now considering USA to Japan timeline. B) No, be in the current situation. But the answer is obviously maybe, as it could still happen. That’s the answer she gave ya melon

you dont understand the answer, maybe you should go back to tiktok where to give easier to understand sound bites.

@@xxdaggerxx5 maybe you should change your content, you might get more views 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

This idiocy again. This was a lie advanced by the Soviets. The Japanese were not stupid. They knew the Soviet Union was on the verge of attacking them.

@@sld1776 the Soviets and the Russians continue to do nothing but lie. The Japanese were certainly very stupid. Only an idiot would attack the US like they did. Only a moron in Japan would think they could win that war

I agree they compliment each other well, sometimes it gets to tense and shouting over or talking past each other, but this was a nice one, except for the hard content that is.

How are they dominating? They're sending human wave attacks. They're not holding back, they're constantly running out of ammo and need to stop to replenish supplies. The craters in Energodar confirm Russia is shelling the plant as a false flag.

@@ChucksSEADnDEAD that last part is just idiotic. If anything Ukraine has a motive to false flag, since they’re desperate for foreign intervention. They’re constantly demanding the US to “tactically nuke” Moscow or to even deploy a no-fly zone over ukraine. They’re always saying that Russia is trying to use the plant as a dirty bomb, which makes no sense. There’s even evidence that Ukraine called a military operation on a power plant a day before them, russia and independent inspectors were going to the site. Nuke inspectors that Russia implored to investigate. Also the craters by the plant, supposedly can only be produced by non-Russian rockets according to weapons inspector Scott Ritter You know Russia is dominating the war, because they took over all the territory they had demanded in negations. Ukraine can’t even protect their ports, which is the vital for any country. There’s even reports of Russians killing 6 Ukrainians for each soldier they lose. Ukraine does look to have air superiority with drones, but we’ll see, because Iran is sending Russia drones and winter is coming. As we know, ukraine is lacking in electricity and fuel. Electricity produced by the electrical grid that Russia showed they can disrupt at will. look at the precision strikes after the crimean bridge bombing. Ukraine couldn’t defend against it.

person sitting opposite Lex.

@@tensevo haha exactly. Nothing more

Putin's regime also so over and over again that they wouldn't invade Ukraine

@@elijahfreeman5299 if russia had plans to invade ukraine then ukraine would be history long ago. Russia protects the people of the Donbas. Putin has been trying to find a solution and agreement since 2008. he was ignored...would the US wait that long? but do your own research

@IsExtinct Putin had concrete plans to invade Ukraine in 2021. The Biden Administration disclosed this and Putin's regime lied over and over again about. Putin invaded the whole country not just Donetsk and Luhansk and he recently just attempted to annex Kherson which is 90% Ukrainian. Research before you comment.

@@elijahfreeman5299 I did my research. Every government lies. I would like to remind you of the US lies that led to the war in Vietnam and Iraq. They also tried it in Cuba, but without success. The US has always tried to destroy Russia. With these lies and war they try to destabilize russia and europe. If you think this is propaganda then you haven't done your research properly.

Defend himself AKA declare control of areas and say it's his territory.

You dont get to have nuclear fuels proliferate without the increased threat of weapons grade getting into the "wrong" hands.

It's because of nuclear weapons that cold war wasn't WW3. Think on that

Well said!

Natural resources don't mean anything without extraction, which is the west's expertise. How many African countries are wealthy in resources but still poorer than the poorest European nations?

NO FUCKING WAY.

They were preparing to sue for peace, they admitted to being beaten, but the crime of dropping those bombs was done anyway in order to show the USSR and China what's up. The fact that people don't know this is sad. The argument people use to justify the mass murder of Japanese civilians in WW2 go like this: ⁠Japanese civilians were all so crazy they’d fight to the last man. ⁠The nukes pushed them into surrender and thus ended the war ⁠Ending the war early saved lives. However, this is just historical revisionism with not a shred of evidence to back it. In fact, the exact opposite is true. The US extended the war, possibly leading to the unnecessary deaths of many many Chinese and Japanese. At the time the US dropped nuclear bombs on Japan, Japan was already willing to surrender and everyone knew it at the time. “The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender.” -Adm. William Leahy, Truman’s chief of staff "I told him I was against it on two counts. First, the Japanese were ready to surrender and it wasn't necessary to hit them with that awful thing. Second, I hated to see our country be the first to use such a weapon.” -President Dwight Eisenhower, the Allied commander in Europe during World War II “The first atomic bomb was an unnecessary experiment. [The Japanese] put out a lot of peace feelers through Russia long before [the bomb was used].” -Admiral William "Bull" Halsey, commander of the U.S. Third Fleet "[T]he use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender.” -Admiral William Leahy, White House chief of staff “[The Japanese] had lost the ability to defend themselves. [American planes] met little, and then virtually no resistanc. It is well-known [now] that the Japanese were seeking to make a peace agreement well before Hiroshima." -Doug Dowd, Pacific-theater rescue pilot “I regret to say that defeat is inevitable” -Prince Konoe, the former prime minister of Japan An independent investigation into the matter after the fact based on a mountain of evidence of interviews with Japanese officials concluded the same thing. “Based on a detailed investigation of all the facts, and supported by the testimony of the surviving Japanese leaders involved, it is the Survey's opinion that certainly prior to 31 December 1945, and in all probability prior to 1 November 1945, Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped, even if Russia had not entered the war, and even if no invasion had been planned or contemplated.” -U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey Everyone was aware Japan already wanted to surrender. The first and second argument people make are also self-contradictory. If Japanese were so crazy they’d “fight to the last man”, then why did the nukes work at all? The US killed more people firebombing Japan than they did with the nukes. They obviously did not care about civilian lives. The truth is, they were already willing to surrender. Why did the USA refuse to accept their surrender when everyone was aware of it? Primarily because the US insisted on unconditional surrender without negotiations, which the Japanese feared would cause them to lose their emperor. “We have noted a series of Japanese peace feelers in Switzerland which OSS Chief William Donovan reported to Truman in May and June [1945]. These suggested, even at this point, that the U.S. demand for unconditional surrender might well be the only serious obstacle to peace. At the center of the explorations, as we also saw, was Allen Dulles, chief of OSS [Office of Strategic Services] operations in Switzerland (and subsequently Director of the CIA). In his 1966 book The Secret Surrender, Dulles recalled that ‘On July 20, 1945, under instructions from Washington, I went to the Potsdam Conference and reported there to Secretary [of War] Stimson on what I had learned from Tokyo - they desired to surrender if they could retain the Emperor and their constitution as a basis for maintaining discipline and order in Japan after the devastating news of surrender became known to the Japanese people.’” -Gar Alperovitz, The Decision to Use the Bomb, Okay, so you might respond to this answer and say, “the mass murder of Japanese civilians is still justified because Japan’s emperor was bad and dropping the nukes let us get rid of the emperor!” Right? Nope. The US allowed Japan to keep their emperor anyways. Meaning the US extended the war for absolutely no reason and is responsible for every death because of it. Despite the US letting Japan keep their emperor anyways, why did Japan accept unconditional surrender initially? Was it because the nukes? Nope. It was because Japan had an ambassador in the USSR at the time named Naotake Satō. The reason the Japanese did not initially accept unconditional surrender despite being willing to surrender and despite believing their loss was inevitable, is because they had an agreement with the Soviet Union called the Soviet-Japanese Neutrality Pact which would make the Soviet Union a neutral player in the war, and thus the Japanese believed they could convince Stalin to leverage that position to negotiate an equal peace settlement, they wanted the USSR to broker the peace with the US rather than doing it on the US’s terms, because they thought they could get a better deal. The Japanese were writing to him frantically throughout the war begging him to convince Stalin to broker peace. The reason the Japanese surrendered was because the Japanese were not aware that Stalin had made a secret deal with Franklin D Roosevelt at the Yalta Conference to invade Japan, something the Japanese had no awareness of. When the USSR invaded Japan, Japan had no cards left but to accept the unconditional surrender. Ultimately, this means not only does the overwhelming mountain of evidence show the nuking of Japan provided no material assistance to the US war in Japan, but that the US had intentionally extended the war with its absurd insistence on unconditional surrender which it would back down on anyways after the war was over, the US possibly extended the war by 2-3 months. The historical revisionist claims about the Japanese apparently having no intention of surrendering and nuking them was necessary to prevent a land invasion is a post-hoc justification with no actual evidence supporting it.

@@DF-be6pn your essay doesnt mean much nowadays. some think it had to be done. they may have needed the bombing regardless how right or wrong it was. in retrospect that is worth considering too.

@@pixelatedsethtube1271 His essay had actual arguments from history. Your comment is nonsensical bs.

@@pixelatedsethtube1271 "They may have needed bombing regardless how right or wrong it was" You should seek help, I am saying this with the best intent in my heart, rational people don't think this way. You are trying to justify mass killing of the civilian population in a country that wasn't capable of defending itself.

Except the monologue conveniently leaves out the facts that two bombs were dropped and the Imperial Japanese Army still wanted to Fight on to the end. It took the intervention of the Emperor himself to over rule those nutcases to bring it to an end!! That part is always over looked by the revisionists and America bashers. Its easy to say it was over after the case, not so easy to tell that to the troops in the pacific campaign who were put through a meat grinder to keep going when we can stop it now. But oh yes “America Bad” is soo sexy for the socialists, oh and lets forget the atrocities of the Imperial Japanese Army through out all of Asia too. Revisionist and a la cart history is not clever at all, its as stupid as that silly little essay.

Ukraine is one of ours. Putin should have stayed in his backwater country.

@@ChucksSEADnDEAD One of whose? Who are you speaking for?

😂 good one

And it hasn't won a fight since WW2 and Russia did most of the heavy lifting.

@@markupton1417 False. The Soviet Union depended on American lend lease. The US also won Desert Storm.

@@ChucksSEADnDEAD yeah ..if you fight a war but I supply you boots I'd say you did the heavy lifting.

All of the evidence suggests the exact opposite

@@alphaclam Dwight D. Eisenhower wrote in his memoir The White House Years: In 1945 Secretary of War Stimson, visiting my headquarters in Germany, informed me that our government was preparing to drop an atomic bomb on Japan. I was one of those who felt that there were a number of cogent reasons to question the wisdom of such an act. During his recitation of the relevant facts, I had been conscious of a feeling of depression and so I voiced to him my grave misgivings, first on the basis of my belief that Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary, and secondly, because I thought that our country should avoid shocking world opinion by the use of a weapon whose employment was, I thought, no longer mandatory as a measure to save American lives.[109] Other U.S. military officers who disagreed with the necessity of the bombings include General of the Army Douglas MacArthur,[110][111] Fleet Admiral William D. Leahy (the Chief of Staff to the President), Brigadier General Carter Clarke (the military intelligence officer who prepared intercepted Japanese cables for U.S. officials), Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz (Commander in Chief of the Pacific Fleet), Fleet Admiral William Halsey Jr. (Commander of the US Third Fleet), and even the man in charge of all strategic air operations against the Japanese home islands, then-Major General Curtis LeMay: The Japanese had, in fact, already sued for peace. The atomic bomb played no decisive part, from a purely military point of view, in the defeat of Japan. - Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz, Commander in Chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, [102] The use of [the atomic bombs] at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the successful bombing with conventional weapons ... The lethal possibilities of atomic warfare in the future are frightening. My own feeling was that in being the first to use it, we had adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarians of the Dark Ages. I was not taught to make war in that fashion, and wars cannot be won by destroying women and children. - Fleet Admiral William D. Leahy, Chief of Staff to President Truman, 1950, [112] The atomic bomb had nothing to do with the end of the war at all. - Major General Curtis LeMay, XXI Bomber Command, September 1945, [113] The first atomic bomb was an unnecessary experiment ... It was a mistake to ever drop it ... [the scientists] had this toy and they wanted to try it out, so they dropped it. - Fleet Admiral William Halsey Jr., 1946, [114] Hasegawa's view is, when the Soviet Union declared war on 8 August,[120] it crushed all hope in Japan's leading circles that the Soviets could be kept out of the war and also that reinforcements from Asia to the Japanese islands would be possible for the expected invasion.[121] Hasegawa wrote: On the basis of the available evidence, however, it is clear that the two atomic bombs ... alone were not decisive in inducing Japan to surrender. Despite their destructive power, the atomic bombs were not sufficient to change the direction of Japanese diplomacy. The Soviet invasion was. Without the Soviet entry in the war, the Japanese would have continued to fight until numerous atomic bombs, a successful allied invasion of the home islands, or continued aerial bombardments, combined with a naval blockade, rendered them incapable of doing so.[116] Ward Wilson wrote that "after Nagasaki was bombed only four major cities remained which could readily have been hit with atomic weapons", and that the Japanese Supreme Council did not bother to convene after the atomic bombings because they were barely more destructive than previous bombings. He wrote that instead, the Soviet declaration of war and invasion of Manchuria and South Sakhalin removed Japan's last diplomatic and military options for negotiating a conditional surrender, and this is what prompted Japan's surrender. He wrote that attributing Japan's surrender to a "miracle weapon", instead of the start of the Soviet invasion, saved face for Japan and enhanced the United States' world standing.[122]

@@abhir7823 Yeah absolutely none of these quotes respond to the fundamental question, which is in regards to the *unconditional* surrender of Japan. Yes, Japan has lost the war. Yes, they wanted to surrender. But they wanted to surrender on *their* terms. But it was out of the question. Irrespective of the military strategy, negotiated surrender was an unacceptable political outcome for the US, and rightly so. The Big Three decided the same in relation to Germany. The negotiated surrender of WW1 is what caused WW2 in the first place. It could not be allowed to happen again. The only way to achieve an unconditional surrender is via the total capitulation of the country. Anything less than total surrender was an unacceptable solution. There is, in fact, zero evidence whatsoever that Japan was willing to accept unconditional surrender prior to the use of the atomic bombs. Japan didn't even accept unconditional surrender after Hiroshima. That is how committed they were to maintaining their system. They were prepared to fight to the last person, and the US was preparing to engage in that fight -- hence the apprehension of the military to pursue unconditional surrender. It would have cost millions of lives on both sides. Once it became clear that the US could destroy the whole country without stepping foot on it, Japan was forced to an unconditional surrender, and even then the Royal family was protected from being prosecuted for their crimes against humanity. They literally chose to be nuked to death rather than prosecute the emperor. That is how wrong you are. You cannot respond to these distinctions because no response exists. You don't understand the difference between negotiated and unconditional surrender.

Japanese massacres of the Chinese peoples were as deadly. By any logic, we had to learn that any war shouldn’t repeat, but here we are again: cities are bombed, mass graves, executions, and rapes.

thank you both for teaching me about each argument.

When you invest yourself in the truth, of course you will be ready. You're not ready.

p.s. it is the playbook of tyrants and it is not a new idea. Captivate the dumb masses by sabre rattling and threats of violence and projection. Focus on self reliance and self defence and the tyrants shrivel away back into their hole.

No

He attended too many world econ forums and decided yes there are too many ppl.

Russia keeps threatning nukes. They've been at it for a decade.

What? Do you want me to find all the times kremlin mafia has mentioned nukes since the start of the war? At the minimum I remember 5 times when they casually mentioned that they have nukes. Normal countries don't talk like that.

Both claims are true. The trenches were filmed by drone and the craters at Energodar prove Russia shelled the plant.

They were all accounted for when they gave them to Russia

@@Sarah8561 Sure but... we're talking about Russia's weapons accounting system. WHO KNOWS!???

@@Sarah8561 And by the way... they did not give them to Russia, as per our treaty, the U.S. removed them. Who educated you?

I think the question is: if we push Putin, you think he will used a thermonuclear tactical weapon..??

@@BuddhaCatt yeah and intelligent smart people will not give a direct answer to it because they know the panic it would cause

Yes, the craters at Energodar show the shells are coming from Russian occupied territory. Did you see the Rosatom spokesperson trying to tell the IAEA inspectors that Ukrainian rockets look Russian because they do a 180 degree flip?

@Benson nope but you can feel my true love for humanity for free . 😂

@Benson lol nice one.👍

Thanks bro love ya.

Well look up agenda 2030 and the WEF What they have planned will obliterate us

All of this appears to represent a comprehensive history. However you are missing the most important parts. Allow me to give you more accurate information 07. Korea as well as Vietnam were fighting imperialist (feudal forces) from the past as well as any westerner would have done, before wanting to be communist. In their view communism equaled democracy. They had no experience with an economically failing communism because it had not happened jet. In their view so called capitalism was equal to feudalism or imperialism. It just meant rich people ignoring the interest of the people. NOT what capitalism became after the war as an investment in the future economy of the people. Don't mistake the same word for a meaning it did not have at the time Korea was semi occupied by Japan. Seen as a fuedal state. Vietnam was semi occupied by the French. Seen as a fuedal state. They have never been military occupied by the Russians or the Chinese in order to force them into communism. Like what happened in eastern Europe. They were driven by anti imperialist motivations. They believed communism was something like democracy. The fact Japan had taken some (insignificant) islands from Russia, meant the same thing to them as nazi Germany wanting to occupy Russia. As they did in the planned operation Barbarossa. It was NOT because they wanted to force Japan retrospectively into communism. They saw communism as a movement against fuedal imperialism. Equal to democracy: a country ruled by the people. They had no idea Marx's economic theories would fail in the future. The what you call preparation for a Russian war declaration by Japan, by contracting an army at the border was exactly interpreted by the Russians as the preparation for a futute invasion of their country. NOT because they wanted to turn Japan retrospectively into a communist state. They wanted to end fuedal monarchy. Just as that the Russians believed nazism was a repetition of fuedal monarchy. Because it looked like it. They wanted to introduce democracy/ not a failing economic system, because they did not know that before it happened. You have to read back history in the opposite direction before you learn to understand it. The Japanese war reaction in general was due to the military occupation of the Pacific by the Americans. Which was advised to them by the english: to build a strong fleet to rule the world, because they were affraid to lose their Commonwealth. They needed an ally to do the job for them. It was a totally alianated idea the US would take the Philippines as their colony: because they already were a democracy. Get the difference? It did not prevent them loosing the Commonwealth in terms of colonies because they became independent anyway. The US fleet just prevoced the Japanese. Just as well as nazi Germany prevoced the Russians. Don't read (explain) history in the inverted meaning than it had. Putin just wants the Russian culture to become part of the rest of the world. And they are welcome. He has the same motivation as Peter the Great had in the past. NOT because he wants to be the repetition of a fuedal monarch! Don't mistake this with the idea he would want to restore the old communist USSR by occupyimg eastern Europe again. He KNOWS communism failed economically. Don't take him for a fool. The MH17 planecrash in Oekraïne was an attempt to kill Putin. His plane flew over the exact same spot 20 minutes later. What would you want to do with a Mexican secret operation to kill your president? Exactly. Don't confuse past motivations (like occupying eastern Europe) with current very different ones. Let it be peace for the sake of human kind. Hope to have informed you better.

@@petervandenengel1208 Stalin did not follow original Marxist theory and the MH17 was confirmed to have been shot down by the Buk launcher numbered 332 from the 53rd anti air missile brigade stationed in Kursk - a Russian military unit. The dings and bends in the metallic skirts match VKontakte social media pictures posted by Russian soldiers. Photos and video of the launcher, launch site and smoke trail confirm it was launched from the separatist side, plus the exact launch spot was confirmed by satellite picture of the scorch mark on the ground. Separatists also published videos of them cheering the shootdown, which were deleted (but archived) after it became public they had shot down a civilian airline.

@@ChucksSEADnDEAD Let me correct that. Marx's theory was impossible to implement as he had thought it out. There has been no communist country succesfull with the economic theory. Stalin had to introduce a military state in Russia to maintain order. As did happen in Spain with Franco and in Greece. In this case to prevent it becoming communist. The MH17 could not have been shot down by a missile, because there were no burning signs on the hull, an exploding rocket would have caused. The rocket type you mention could not reach the altitude the plane was flying at. There has been a cabin door sifted with bullets killing the pilotes, which was photographed but dissapeard from the sight. Also the black box was missing. There have been numerous witnesses that saw the plane was circeled by two military jets before it crashed. A temp employee of flight control in the tower of the airfield has seen this on the radar as well and reported it on his mobile phone. He has been dissapeared since. The so called evidence you are referring to has been collected by a civillian initiative set up in England. Gathering random pictures on the internet. Yes, there have been Russian military groups carrying missiles in the Ukraine. Who had nothing to do with the incident and ofcourse you can find footage of military celebrating something. You just connected the wrong dots. May I remind you of satellite images prooving Sadam Hussein was making weapons of mass destruction, he was not producing? Wake up.

@@username0754 I am using facts to create opinion not the other way around. I was not bullied at school, so you are basing opinion on spin. I don't fall for using magic in producing seemingly coherent language which is actually b.s. itself.

Because the two governments are not morally or politically equivalent, and nuclear bomb dropping isn't a fairness issue.

its called MAD, Mutually Assured Destruction, keep up.

"Why can't we be bad, the US was bad" do you realize how psychotic this line of reasoning sounds? So because serial killers exist you want to try their activities?

It's not equal at all. Ukraine did nothing to Russia while the Japanese empire was massacring civilians and forcing women into slavery.

wtf are you talking about?

What a stupid comment.

You fucking idiot. He also said he won't invade Ukraine. His word is worthless, just like your brain.

Putin and his top officials also said repeatedly that they wouldn't attack Ukraine, that the Russian forces in Belarus were stationed there for an upcoming exercise.

Russia literally threatens nuclear Holocaust a few times a month for the last 6 months. Wtf do you mean he says he won’t use them?

it’s a stupid question to ask. impossible to answer.

it also wasn’t a non answer. i’ll simplify it: Putin is currently weighing his option and current strategy. if he reaches a point where it makes sense to use nuclear weapons to deeescalate immediately and that option is strategically more sound than dragging this on: putin will do it. and his plan is also working so far.

It's called A242 but people know it as Novichok.

She's right on the money though

Wrong

@@berendharmsen No. She's a paid apologist for American empire.

That works, but when your population is less than that of Java, not a great or grand strategy.

I am glad you are hear to bring truth to the world.....your own private truth.

@@tensevo Your welcome.

Well Putin said he will use weapons the like of which mankind has never seen….Russian state TV has simulated nuking the United Kingdom. so maybe that has something to do with her thinking