whats the timestamp

@@heightnotfound3874 beginning in highlights.

So many times Will was talking, I was like... and what happened with Bad Boys 2 then lol

First time seeing the video, as soon as he said that I went to look for this comment 😂

“Love will make you do crazy things” like violence 😄

My thoughts exactly

It was an entanglement

What minute?

Sheesh 🙄

Bro right when he said that I scrolled down to see if anyone said it...AND IT’S THE FIRST COMMENT

Haha! Nice.

i was gonna like this comment but I think you hit the right number

I was going to make a similar comment. "Violence is not the answer." - Will Smith

😂

@@Hetiekae Tell the toof

But I think there is also the choice to do something or not. Once you have chosen to do a certain role, that's the moment to understand, but before you have chosen it you might not agree with it and you can choose just not to play it...

Well look at Will today, hmmmm What does he really understand. Agree with your point

@@Casandrargentina the choice only lies in if you actually are fit for the role and that requires a level of self awareness that will hasn’t had in a lot of instances

@@Casandrargentina I think you're approaching "method acting." That is considered a dangerous technique for psychology.

Will didn't do Django because: 1.Django wasn't a "lead" role 2. Indy Film 3. No merchandise cash 4. Intimidated by the cast 5. His agent knew the role could hurt Will's image more than it could help

i noticed that too lol

Yes! At first I thought it's because Smith is kind of annoying (or that shit about racism having a time and place) -- but -- by the end with the talk about doing play, I thought he was genuinely trying to engage with Smith. Like pierce that heavily moneyed, too famous for his own good, vaguely Scientologist Big Willie bubble and make a connection.

@@DoctorFurioso Sam is just a huge actor that did a lot of roles, but hasnt really got that famous as much as he deserves. While Will is just a full on star with not that many movies under his belt. Both are amazing actors, but i prefer Sam, because for me he just that much better.

Will is SO cringy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I noticed that and my thought was "Only Sam Jackson could get away with that." Will Smith has bitch written all over him, he would whine, puff his chest out or walk off the set if anyone else did that to him.

i'll let them know. thx

They have a limited time and wanna cover more ground. They are there for that reason or else it won’t even be an interview; just a discussion.

@@supahdweeb7613 I know you're just saying that for the sake of arguement.. But I know that you know what I mean...

@@supahdweeb7613 1) there's infinite solutions to GETTING RID OF THESE HOSTS (but y'all must remember the REASON the hosts are there: to TRY AND GET FAMOUS THEMSELVES [did we need TWO hosts? hell no!]...which is Sleazy 101)...... 2) you can tell most of the actors will do these roundtables for HOURS if allowed to... (they almost never get to hang with their peers, and instead are surrounded by little people looking UP to them)....BUT I'D HAVE A COUPLE BOTTLES OF BOOZE ON THE TABLE, so we watch them all loosen up over 2 or 3 hours!

@@pete3816 I doubt that. Edits are supposed to make videos better.. You don't know what you're talking about..

Also they put up info of his role as Deadshot when he talked about making movies for putting an idea into the world and making sense to him..... Deadshot was what idea Will? ;)

He also said it had to relate to love and he didn’t see it in Django. I thought however that Jamie Fox’s character did all he did out of live for his wife. So I’m curious as to what Will meant.

Deadshot's story in SS was not centred on his being a hitman rather being a father. That's a relevant difference, I'd say.

He's a hypocrite given the violent movies he stars in. Arrogance at its finest when he doesn't do a Tarantino movie because Quentin refused to change the entire storyline for Will. Ego headed dick.

@@gideonharris1493 Your random self-righteous albeit simpleminded opinion is duly noted and ignored. Welcome to Internet.

Noooo

It’s the editing that makes it seem like the host is cutting them off, I don’t believe he’s actually cutting them off

No just no. He knows nothing about cinema compared to this guy who knows every movie ever made. Norton only asks superficial questions to get a laugh.

hate the host

Absolutely! It is annoying to see and hear a legend like Michael Caine, being cut like that, sometimes in the middle of the thought or sentence. This host is totally out of the subject and person infornt of him. Totally irrelevant...Even if he has his fine bit of questions, that is not the path, the way to reveal it. Such a prick!

I honestly think it's the editing 90% of the time. It doesn't feel like a conversational shift.. it's very unnatural and unpolite.

its literally the worst thing you can do as an interviewer. we call it "missing the story" in journalism bc the interviewer is so focused on his list of questions to get through he misses the oppurtunity to get the story that people want to hear.

agree 100%. he should stay executive of whatever hes doing. not being a host. lame

Agree... too many people are trying to make every movie, every Tweet about racism, sexism, social justice... man I just want to relax, my job, my bank loans, my family are issues enough in my life... now you gotta make me angry, guilty or force-feed me more stress?

@@lovinmclovin5290 huh?

@@XiuFeanaro6 what?

@@mariolisa2832 huh?

I totally agree with Sam Jackson! The man is a legend!

No, he tries to choose his roles wisely. Hes a perfectionist. Its his strength and his flaw.

Thats a wild take

If we'd live in a comic world he'd be Brad Pitt's evil brother

Benicio looks like himself, you're doing pattern matching (facial features and structures that are similar), and then adding a disparaging twist. So that you sound insightful and quipy.

Robert Easter lmao i promise you its not that deep weirdo

Are you sure?

But better at acting

@tinwoods you clownin

​@tinwoods Will is engraved in everyones mind mostly as a comedy actor, while he is very versatile in my opinion he is not fit for a western movie..ignoring the WW West which was still mostly comedy.. can you imagine him becoming cold hearted killer, because eventualy thats what he MUST do to survive and find his wife ? hardly.. thats why HE insisted that he wants Django to be a love story.. not vengeance.. Jamie played it flawlessly. Ofcourse he is mostly comedian, just like Will a very versatile actior, but his appearance and voice was more fit for this role. Django evolved from a "slave scared for his & his wifes life" into "nothing will stop him until he finds and rescues his wife" which you can perfectly see in his expression and body language..

Jakommo you must not have seen I Am Legend?

@tinwoods no fking way. Foxx is far more talented. An his face is badass too

@@coreydaprince sure i did, several times. yet i can safely say Will didnt fit into Django role

Benicio is kinda hot in a weird way!

He's a handsome mellow dude

Love him!

I felt the same way. Stupid fucker

Stephen Galloway? That bitch is annoying

I think he was just trying to keep to a strict time schedule. As much as it would have been awesome to hear Benicio continue, it likely would have taken up the entire rest of the show.

100% agree!!

If each of these very experienced people were allowed to talk as much as they wanted the video would run too long. The host has many important jobs, one of which is to keep things moving so that the final edit can be succinct. It's quite possible that a person stops talking, perhaps adds a few words that don't move their statement forward, and the sequence is cut short by editors as they prepare the video for release. This video was absolutely not presented here as it was shot, to think so is absurd. You probably agree with me on that, so the question then is, what was said about the prejudice/racism issue that was not included in the final video? We will probably never know, so it is hard to ascribe a judgement on how 'nice' including or excluding that content was.

awkward an kind of disrespectful

usually seems JUST disrespectful

I forgot her name but the lady interviewing ricky gervais etc. I loved her style and the guests seemed really relaxed too

Yes! she is really good i like her too.

I don't think a lot of times that's what is really going on. I think that's sound and video editing. Sometimes it might happen, but I've been watching it and it seems that whenever the guests are on a roll about something, and then he interjects with a completely random, unrelated question - I think that's the power of film editing on display.

I think Stephen Galloway would very much approve of this.

lmao so true, i feel like he's just there to get it over with

Time?

Louis Lalande bo31411 is just giving an example that is very in character for the gas bag interviewer, he doesnt actually say it at any point

LMAO

Supah Dweeb maybe 55 at best

Black dont crack

@@aprilrawls8929 Yes.

All part of the plan

@@maul8384 The Black Man Plan.

I know. Thank heavens for the skip button. I kept skipping past Will Smiths self adoration. Its pathetic!

I second that! BLOODY interrupting them after questioning them with more questions

I agree it would be better. Maybe a screen with questions. I mean sombody has to ask questions or they would go on about the same topic for 30 mins. Still tho I agree.

Or two of the actors could be hosts.

@@dranomiscato2510 I didn't bother to note the time, but three times the shortest host cut Sam off, seemingly to shut him up. These are edited; I would have edited those for improvement as well. But perhaps Sam was hogging the mic and needed to be redirected. What's on the cutting room floor could be very significant as well!

True. I just saw a roundtable with Jim Carrey and other comedy actors and the host didn't have to interfere to much, the conversation was just going and it became more interesting that way.

And always ready to laugh or crack jokes, yup 😎

“force it” i see what u did the buckstoo

My grandfather used to travel a ton for work, and he said he ended up on the same row as Samuel Jackson for a flight. He said he was one of the most intelligent men hes probably talked to, and it just happens, hes so smooth.

Interviewer 1: "In Quentin's movies, the "N-word" is everywhere. Does that bother you?" Sam:..........No, it's a movie. Interviewer 2: "What about the amount of violence? Has it bothered you?" Sam:.....No, it's a movie. Clearly these two "fine" interviewers have an ulterior motive.

I

He's a 13 year old in a 50 year old body.

But... he said he thought that when he was 15, and then saying he realized that set up an unhealthy dynamic of basing his self worth on how well his movies did.

That was fucking awesome!

Two favorite directors and two of the best character actors

time stamp pleaseeeee

44:59

Lol

+chris badette he won an Oscar in Traffic

okay and? he still very underrated

flip ya fo real!

YOU DON'T KNOW THE MEANING OF UNDERRATED SIR

He has an Oscar, what more do you want?

The moderators need to bring out the quiet ones and keep some quiet.

Shows how high the others think about themselves. Ruffalo is real and I he has a charming innocence about him that hasn't been altered by the money or fame.

Very humble dude

Mark doesn't need appreciation ..he has got an elevated level of consciousness.

Nexscht take a roight onto Donlandsch Avenue and droive 500 hundred metahs.

GPS: You bloody moron,you missed the U-turn. Turn around you Twat.

She was only sixteen years old

@@mbwhly Thats fine in the EU, don't need them any older ;)

@@martywittenberg1427 oi ma boi moichael doesn't swoer

I get both. Hiding behind "it's just..." is either ignorant or cowardly for educated people. Images matter. At the same time, there comes a point when everybody just wants to be human for a minute and not try to carry the weight of the world. There is room for both.

@@treasurethetime2463 loved your view and how you delivered that. I agree!

@Tito Tim Travels geeze, spot on.

Yes

I love how all of them lowkey mocked Smith's moralizing monologue. When he simply just turned down a great role for carrier/PR reasons and because Tarantino refused to make it one-dimensional for Smith's pr taste - while Jackson played a real monster (a much riskier character) and had no problem with it. And killed it.

I love Will Smiths movies, I do... but I am so damn glad he didn't play in Django. Thank you Jamie for making a badass western flick lol.

Guests: "interesting answer" Host: "new topic" the hosts suck

Seriously. The way there was no follow up to Caines Hitchcock story. He turned to Will like he couldn’t move on fast enough. Ugh. This host 😒👎🏿👎🏿😑

Everyone complains, but the fact is he has to make sure everyone speaks and cover a lot of ground in a limited time. If he let someone go on with an anecdote, people would complain that only that one story got explored. He is clumsy about it, but he hasn't got much choice.

He has a habit of cutting a moment abruptly which kills a connection between us and whatever the actor may be conveying.

He just have a very big ego

His wife order him

@@callasky and a "stable genius" with a big brain.

Me too…if only they were able to speak more…

Not Mark

I think the roundtable-concept is great, but would be more authentic without hosts. If there were a deck of cards with questions on the table to start the conversation, I think the people around the table could handle that masterfully in a way more natural manner.

This aged like milk tbh. Never been a WS fan, don't at me.

absolutely

Very true, even when he is only sitting there, attentively listening. He listens with an intensity that is riveting. And he makes subtle facial reactions that are so interesting to watch. His charisma is huge no matter if he is talking, sitting, standing, whatever. I can't take my eyes off him, and don't want to.

oh my. what you wrote was so lovely. write more :)

I'm not gay but I think I have a man-crush on him. Him and Terry Crews are too cool for school.

Agreed! His sexy af🥰🥰🥰

But this comment aged like fine wine🍷 You have impeccable timing sir🤣👍🏻

+GBell19 83

Amazing

But we know.. and we will keep letting him know that

I promise you for many of the actors you admire, the moment they have full self awareness of that and can buy into it, they very likely won't be so anymore.

yes! saw his movies hes very underrated I feel like people dont appreciate him enough as an actor

I don't know how good he is either.

Yea? How? He plays himself in every movie. What's so special about that

“HAVE YOU EVER FELT SAD?!” -Galloway cutting you off

I wish Brando had done more interviews

@Kevin Prima That would be because he can.

yes completely agree

get yout fucking hands of my neck

JERSEY JOHNBOY totally agree! Love the guy

he is like Brad Pitt on drugs and fastfood

Exactly.....came back to bit him

He's obviously very needy in terms of getting attention, but he also has a habit of pretending to be smarter than he is, and I think that's the source of insecurity. Like when he was challenged about "truth doesn't have a side", he wasn't prepared and started spouting nonsense out of nervousness. He's always been a charming guy, but he's no genius.

@@WalterLiddy 💯

Sounds human to me. 🤷‍♀️

He's a libra.

@@imaqtat16 using that as an excuse is a poor one tbh. It doesn't matter what star sign you are, its how you act and how you're making yourself look. Whether it be by a certain mannerism or just a difference of opinion (saying this as a example).

I haven't seen it yet. but I heard it was off the chain

+Shareef Hall Dude you should..Amazing movie..

+Yawo Elevn will do, preciate it

+Yawo Elevn *Toro

+Yawo Elevn Del Toro is amazing in every movie.

He also tells everybody here that his development was arrested at 15 then proved it at the Oscars

Omg Yes!

Pretty good idea for a girl.

@@hoss9688 gotta be a middle eastern dude

Nah. Get Lacey to interview the guys instead. Or Graham Norton.

I was JUST thinking this lmao, that would be way better tho

His arm was around the chair and I think that must have been annoying to say the least. Sam Jackson is egotistical.

@@mofnn24 Jesus Christ. What's your problem with Samuel Jackson?

@mofnn I took it as older man in a not so comfortable seat. Funny how you found negativity.

@@dianeross4522 being protective of a friend isn't negative

@@christurner2398 I agree. My comment was for mofnn who said it was egotistical. Read that...

I immediately thought of this too. So cringe

Sam doesn't drink. He's been sober for 30 years. he use to be a huge alcohol and drug addicted

I want Michael Caine and Samuel L. Jackson to tell stories to each other with drinks in front of a camera. They had the best anecdotes, delivery, and off-the-cuff commentary. These two interviewers take away from the natural flow of the room.

Cain and Jackson are heavyweights The two of them alone would have been great

It’s cause they’re old and so chill with themselves

Me too. The man is a class act.

Ateka9 Such a great actor. Traffic, Inherent Vice, and 21 Grams were amazing performances. Seems really chill also. Cool guy to have a beer with.

Braahms Hope you've seen him in Sicario as well. He's a monster.

Graham and Conan are the absolute best!🍺🥃

Agreed!

And the best stories.

all English ppl do :P

I’m going to have to respectfully disagree.....Donald Duck has the best accent by far

I gotta disagree. If anybody came off as phoney it was cain. Not much mind you. I thought that smiths comments made me feel worse for him, in the sense that he obviously is a romantic and his relationship with jada has pushed him to an awful place, I feel he's put himself in a terrible spot with her. I will say Jackson seems the most at ease definitely charismatic, as he always does. Also, just to mention, I love Michael cain. He's an amazing actor and even with my perceived affectation of his, he still comes across as a genuine and likable human being. All of these actors seem very down to earth. And this was a great look into there personalities outside of the silver screen.

will smith at 9:46- 'nobody will ever cheat on me if I am the biggest actor'.......... he didn't count on entanglements..

SLJ knows that Will chatting hella waffle there thats why lol

I though I was the only one that saw that but it could've been a cut that the editors did. Buy i peeped that lol

He had to get that out.

Aged even worse now lol

And the hard part is, while I like Don, and think he is a really good actor, he just didn't fit the role...Terrance had everything to succeed.

Elefante Branco he did a much better job than Terrance.

Clark Culver yah.

CALM DOWN GUYS

They're both incredible actors but Howard was easily the better fit.

@Martin Latour Beat me to it. He seems like a decent guy but he's one of these people who has convinced themselves that their opinions are the only "correct" way to think and the fact that he's an actor means that his views somehow carry more weight.

Nah Keanu Reeves and terry crews are 2 of the nicest.

@Martin Latour Awww, he doesn't support your demented demagogue? What kind of a moron wouldn't support putting kids in concentration camps anyway? Kids definitely need to concentrate more!

​@Martin Latour America has obviously never been great, whether is was under Obama, Bush or under Trump, but have you read up on the differences between these centers during these eras? Trump has made a point of trying to undo everything that was under Obama, so perhaps he should chose to undo the things that were actually bad, such as these centers, rather than doubling down on the cruelty and family separation? I don't treat politics like a fucking football match, where I root for a single team no matter what they do. Perhaps if you spent less time idolizing a fucking narcissistic wannabe-dictator, and spent more time using that head of yours (which, though in pretty shoddy condition, should have some light reasoning power), you might realize that it doesn't matter if your pick for president wins or not, as long as the people are losing. And perhaps if you spend less time relying on three letter acronyms (TDS, SJW...) to describe your "opponents", and more time thinking about the what is actually happening, people like you wouldn't have to waste humanity's time and resources picking leaders who are so far removed from reality that they might as well live in fucking Narnia. I love how it's somehow the people who oppose that amoeba you're trying to label as deranged. That's some solid propagandist shit right there. Grow the fuck up, and try looking at the consequences of electing your spoiled (in all meanings of that word), cowardly megalomaniac as president. Your country is going down the shitter, yet you somehow confuse the smell of shit for the smell of roses.

@@edwardv1255 Thank you -

but it's not. Michael wasn't answering the question by throwing in a "my family's been selling fish for 300 years" at the beginning then went off on a tangent. it was the interjection that got him back on track and properly answering with the architect's errand boy answer which was great. so many people here have such a reaction to this but yet aren't truly picking up the cues of how well the conversation is actually flowing because of the hosts. good hosts know when to reign their guests in and control how the conversation is flowing. a truly bad host or an inexperienced host would just let Michael ramble on and ignore that there are other people at the table, like the Democrat debate where there was an obvious agenda to keep the focus on just the big players like Kamala Harris, Kamala Harris, and Kamala Harris, and occasionally let the old guys add a quip or two. that was a travesty of a debate. this is a good interview.

@@BenjiSun It's a round-table, the whole format is designed to let the actors talk with each other and tell stories. The criticism of the host is that he treats it as an interview, which is a different format.

@@ddandymann sure, it's a round-table, but does that mean it's not an interview? and that it doesn't have a host, a time limit, and a number of questions to get through? does that one word round-table, supersede everything else? if that's the case then there's no host and with seniority gets priority, Caine would be on his tangents non-stop with the occasional interjection from Jackson, and everyone else can just shut up and f off. which of them at the table would stop themselves and say, oh wait, we haven't let Ruffalo or Edgerton speak yet, i sincerely care what they have to say. no, Caine stops, it'll be Jackson or Smith getting their righteous minute in. even in a self-contained roundtable discussion, it'll just be a seniority dominant dialogue. you might be ok with that. i'm not. i'd rather hear a variety of opinions and stories than just Michael Caine reminiscing about nonsense. it's as if a lot of the commenters here don't think Graham Norton's show has a more rigid structure than they presume and actors are capable of being that concise and able to stop without being reeled in, or Letterman or Kimmel suddenly switches to full on sarcasm mode when actors go off script. this host is just more robotic in his handling of the structure. he's not being rude to try and guide the interview (and it is an interview) on course. it's ultimately their format, not your vision of their format.

@@BenjiSun EXACTLY, so many people don't realise that the guy in charge is the interviewer not the interviewee in this case interviewees. He wasnt being rude, he was just keeping everything on track and keeping a good flow of answering their questions and having the actors talk to each other.

he is the boss I think

he met deadshot hulk & nick fury

Lmao someone else said it best: it’s like the little one is the ventriloquist and the big one is his dummy. 😂 Just another way to interrupt people without being blamed.

Stop

😂😂

🤣🤣🤣

Hilarious but true 😂

I said the same thing on another round table. It's a British/Australian thing when it comes to time/schedule for a program

He's the executive producer so without him there is no show. He also has to cut people off otherwise they would go on forever. Most actors are not used to sharing the spotlight with 7 other people who are as big or bigger than them.

What we need is Graham Norton holding James Lipton's cards of questions. If I were interviewing a group like this (and I hope to do it someday), I would go into it knowing: a) Will Smith will try to hog the conversation b) the most wry comments will come from Mark Ruffalo c) Samuel is the linchpin - he has seen every film the others have made so he can speak to them d) Plus I would attempt to steer the conversations between actors we don't hear from as much (Joe, Michael and Benicio). But primarily it would be research, research, research with clear questions at the appropriate times, Brian Linehan style (Canadian interviewer back in the day). There is no need for butting in with silly questions - that's what editing is for.

he is an editing tool for the producers ....

Galloway is professional and great. He is a MODERATOR. Google the meaning of it.

𝚆𝚘𝚠🤦🏽‍♀️

Underrated comment 😂

Yea they don't know how to smoothly transition from one actor to another. They are terrible lol. I feel like they don't know how to appreciate these wonderful actors. I mean do we even see them laugh with them at any point or at least let the actors define the roundtable themselves.

909sickle I thought that was adorable

So true...would be better without the host's

Stuart Greer i bet that ex is probably saying the same thing nowadays

If he knows hows how it is to be cheated on, why is he cheating himself?

Do what?

It was not cheating when they were separated and in a open relationship. Like, you don't even know of Will had a side piece. We learned about this only bc, August open his big mouth. Lmao!

@@XiuFeanaro6 you're right Will had many affairs

@@nikidon99 Prove it lol.

@@XiuFeanaro6 It is cheating if you are married open or not.

@@jjbizzare96 how can it be cheating when both parties are aware and had an arrangement? It cannot be. Literally cheating is being dishonest (which none of them were, from my understanding of their situation) and breaking a promise (which they did not do, sure they reshaped the original agreement i.e vows, that doesn't mean you're breaking them).

Bob did he really? bc django's character is openly the worst performance in it, it didn't have much meat on it to make him win anything or elevate him to a higher level acting wise.. will also got a lot of other leads ever since.

maya maybe the "worst performance" had more to do with Jamie Foxx. I was really disappointed when I found out Will Smith dropped out and Foxx stepped in.

Goodness... That movie was just plain awful. Not that Will makes the best movies, but at least they are slightly more watchable.

What the hell are you people talking about? Django was great and Jamie Foxx nailed the part.

Bullshit! The story about wanting to be the greatest love story it is just an excuse to hide the real reason: HIS HUGE EGO! Nobody can outshine Will Smith and wherever he is he has to be the star. SUICIDE SQUAD actors were all screwed up because he for sure influenced the WB executives saying that he is the protagonist and the film shouldn't highlight too much the bad guys' behavior for the sake of the FAMILIE VALUES. So WB cut and changed all the film to highlight Will's Scenes and also cleaned all that was not suitable for a family movie. He even told that he should be the one to kill the bad guy, how now he says that wanted a love story and not about revenge. "The other character was the lead! I was like, 'No, Quentin, please, I need to kill the bad guy!'- Will Smith quote.