I really enjoy these short, focused discussions that don't belabour the point and leave us with lots of fodder to think and discuss amongst ourselves. Thank you.

Something rather than nothing is so philosophical, but why and from where does quantum fluctuations come from? Consciousness that gives us the ability to experience the something is amazing

Quantum theory uncertainty principle assumes existence of space time as well as vacuum energy to “create particles”, I believe. Therefore it doesn’t create particles from nothing. Also it begs the question of how quantum laws came to be?

We think in terms of time, and in terms of cause and effect. We can not even conceive of what is outside time, and not dependent on cause and effect. Is there such? Undoubtably there is, since time and cause and effect to do not allow us to explain the universe, yet it is here.

Awareness is known by awareness alone.

4:57 I love your channel and your audience, I'm gonna comment on ALL your videos for years until I reach your level of subscribers.

If the science doesn't begin from the fact that I exist, it is wrong headed

When sincerity is better than the ( illusory ) precision...

Does the work created by the workman understand the workman? Whatever is made, can it understand its maker? If humans came out of the universe, were made by the universe, then is it realistic or silly to expect humans can understand the universe?

Thats a great point made by Willem, that a large part of the difficulty of our assault on this question is in the limitations of our language and our vocabulary.

Of course there is an answer, we just may not have access to it. If something is happening and you ask "why" or "how", it's a perfectly valid question because the thing is happening in front of you and there's some reason for that... saying "no, there is no answer to how that works" is a logical inconsistency.

The miniscularity of our position within the infinitesimal vastness tells us all we need to know.... That beauty is truth and truth is beauty, That is all ye need to know.

The idea of nothing is just inconceivable,ok no objects one can envisage,but how one even begin to comprehend no space,is there even such a thing.

Excellent video. Synchs with my understanding that there is a mystery at the heart of reality and existence of unknowingness and uncertainty but I think Willem squibs his answer at the end. He suggests the mystery of existence (God) is unknowable & then says we can apprehend it in a number of ways.

Existence exists. Ayn Rand Existence exists and the universe is its character, its nature. The main thing about the universe, that is frequently overlooked, is that The universe is not just another thing in the universe. Which means you cannot meaningfully ask the same questions about the universe that you can about things in the universe. To do so is to implicitly assume The universe, its just another thing in the universe.

going backward from something is causation? how go backward from causation?

IF 'nothing' is the theroretical minimum which always will exist to generate the expanse of the 'something' that always will exist?

Your topic is existence, I will post again my view about it so that this concept will carry on. Regarding the origin of things, in quantum physics it could be said that energy exists forever since the law of conservation of energy states that " energy could neither be created nor destroyed it only transforms from one to another" in which sense it means energy is there forever thus infinitely there is something instead of nothing. Where we always use the basic equation energy entering in the system = energy going out. Even if there was still only stellar space and there no matter but in reality in the quantum realm it was just plasma or space of energy field. As per quantum physics, at quantum state particles are in constant vibration, and in the long process like billions of years elements are created, and due to heat which produces nuclear fission and fusion processes and magnetic field, the elements would produce isotopes, and the process repeats and then the big bang expansion occurs. Second thing is that consciousness is inherent in nature. How is that? Spinoza presents the basic elements of his picture of God. God is the infinite, necessarily existing (that is, self-caused), unique substance of the universe. There is only one substance in the universe; it is God; and everything else that is, is in God. But be aware that this is different concept than the God being described in the Bible which instructs human beings morality, who created heaven and hell, since this God is an individual invisible being who lives in the heavens as claimed by believers. As we can observe everything, bacteria, viruses, insects, and when we look at them and analyse intricately, we will be amazed with much astonishment as to their peculiarity and amazing ability. It is so obvious that a certain force of entity should have caused them. That might be the one which was pointed Spinoza, he called a God, a self caused, one substance in the universe. This substance must be conscious to have come up how to design everything like how many kinds of fishes look like, insects, birds with their amazing capabilities. Since, according to him everything is in God, thus everything is conscious. To support that claim many experiments show that water in glasses reacts to words. Another thing is that traditional farmers doing a winnowing of rice paddies make sound with their voice and whistle when they want more air and air seems to respond to blow more. Now how life emerged? Look at public water. It has been treated with chlorine and undergone some purification processes but when you store it in the white plastic storage tank where sunlight could pass through algae will gradually be produced, then bacteria would also exist. What is water composed of? It is hydrogen and oxygen, and also air contaminates it which is composed of nitrogen and oxygen. Then we ask what is there in the hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen and other elements which might be present in the water and how it reacts with words? While we know that they just contain molecules and molecules contain electrons, neutrons and protons. Then how species evolve with amazing design? This is my view, we could combine these theories. We go back to the quantum realm of what the experiment has shown in the double slit board where it seems that particles have consciousness in my view. Others insist that there was no consciousness involved there but for me there is. Why? When someone is observing the particles in the double slit experiment, they would surely go as expected since the energy radiating from the observer is stronger than the energy of the particles that it would act like it was being controlled. When no one is observing or when no outside force is acting on it, it would go as it wants to go like a bacteria deciding to go where it wants. That’s why in my view in the quantum realm there is consciousness or in totality the universe is conscious. What about the question of the language in the DNA of living cells? This would be the theory. When various conscious particles as derived as per the anomaly in the quantum experiment, cling into the DNA, then having form combined consciousness, and now created species would manage by itself to create language or code in the DNA. According to a neuroscientist the human body needs 90 minerals for it to have the best health condition. Now imagine such various kinds elements we do not know yet which specific element has the conscious properties, but we can only assume that which such complex combination, advance functions could be performed as we are, the human consciousness, comparing that of a computer functions excellently with just two options of gate the zero and one. As observed in the simple experiment with water reacts with words, we can infer that anything which has water has consciousness like algae, bacteria, virus, plants, insects upto the human being. Think about the cells of human being, they, convert nutrients into energy, cure inflammation, fight enemy, signal you to eat, poop, sleep and many more. Now it becomes clear The theory of multiverse also would be in conjunction with this view, where it relates that at any space multiverse exists. Considering it collectively, energy and consciousness are inherent in nature. With these energy and consciousness it could originate species and also made the galaxies to arrange by themselves. Being conscious they could evolve by themselves, right? A computer could do a tremendous job with just a binary combination of gate zero and one. Compared to conscious particles, consciousness surely would be much more advanced, complex and amazing which is the primality of genes and DNA, where particles like different sorts of electrons, protons, gamma, theta or what not (refer to the water in the tank above) clinging to it forming different kinds of species. This process underwent a billion years in the past. With science as our tool in scrutinising subjects, and referring to the data which have been gathered for the past centuries, the data does not point to any supernatural being with which anomaly that it has created things, but rather, it would aligns with the postulate of Spinoza regarding the universe. There are levels of consciousness; consciousness of algae, bacteria, plants, cells of living things, and those which have brain like insects, animals then human beings. To show that water is conscious watch the video in the link below; kzfaq.info/get/bejne/iJ-ZZ694x9nQaYU.htmlsi=NWCFOY1bQ-jbEcTt

Prime mover is a necessity in any explanation. Whether you embrace it is another question. You might live comfortably without it.

Willem Drees is comfortable without having an answer. That's the best understanding. He has found the nature of existence and found that there cannot be an answer. Atleast science cannot find the answer.

To me, the answer as to why there is anything at all is simple - because there has always been something. If there was nothing at all, then there would be no possible way for something to become. The fact that something exists means that by default, there has always been something. And the fact that there is something, means than nothing has never been a possible state. I'm not sure where the problem is.

What if mystery was a necessity woven into reality? The 'negative' charge of the universe to a 'positive' charge of consciousness in order to create an event we call 'reality'?

“Quantum bubbling” says it all.

Nothing can't generate something, but only if there already is the law of cause and effect, which is not nothing.

"Nothing" must be void of description. If you can describe it, define it, assign a number to it, or compare it to something else, it's not "Nothing". Therfore, nothingness is an impossibility.

There must be an answer behind the question concerning the mystery of existence, its just that science nor religion is aware of it, at least not yet. We can not assume any answer just to please our yarning for an answer, but if each one of us can make an effort to understand the mystery behind our own existence, the true mystery behind existence would eventually be known to us all.

It requires a human to ask that question. No human no question.

If there is not reincarnation, the answer is Death... If there is reincarnation, the answer is given in between the incarnation phases ... but you must absolutely renounce the answer to incarnate again.... If you hold the answer, you don't have to born ... eternal oblivion of the answer is That that contingently had/is/will be existed/exist an become manifested in Time

Our universe exists so existence has a non zero probability. Any event with a non zero probability of occurrence will occur an infinite number of times over an infinite amount of time.

3:30 The moment "you" say "we" are "humans," is the moment "you" demonstrate "your" lack of experience in existing! Therefore, "you" are no scientist, especially when compared to the character that lived the life labeled as Socrates! Also, Socrates was/is more of a scientist than Aristotle, for "his" awareness has a more broader reach in understanding the inner workings behind these cyclical realities. That's why so many of that character's lifetimes involved being either converted into religious figures or died at the hands of those "humans" who were incapable of knowing "their own" *'s from a hole in a ground!

The mystery is the mind. Mystifies itself from itself. And here it is worldbeing itself. Existence is a mental construct. Mind to itself is the whole. You cannot be not mind and be existing in any form.

Ever considered inviting Chris Langan?

The epiphany here is that nothing exist.came from within

How can we explain the existence of the god ?

The concept that consciousness is fundamental is bolstered by the similarities of human descriptions of being conscious over the eons; each description is indistinguishable regardless of who, where, when and it is also unrelated to intelligence levels. This is such an unlikely phenomenon that it suggests individual brains tune into consciousness, as it were, rather than generate it - in the same way that any radio tuned to the same station would play the same songs. A corollary of this would have to be panpsychism as, with everything being made of atoms, we cannot expect certain structures to be imbibed with consciousness and others not; because at some stage this would require a ’switch’ or a special particle or ingredient. A plate of food in front of you cannot be dead and unconscious before you eat it then alive and conscious once inside you merely because its atoms have been rearranged.

It is closer to truth to admit that all that we know is that we know nothing...

Existence is the default state. Gotta say the easiest and most logical state is non-existence. But obviously I am wrong about this. By the way where is existence/universe located?

Does "nothing", meaning "strictly nothing", exist somewhere in our universe ? As far as we know, it's impossible since there is something even in the so called "void" : quantum fluctuations. My belief is since there's something, it means there could not be nothing. Nothing was, is and will be an impossible.

It's all been a dream. When you die, you'll awaken.

It would be nice if there was more nothing, there is so much stuff it’s hard to move: Envelopes Dishwashers Cardboard Boxes Plastic boxes Wooden boxes Computers Super computers Apple computers Rugs Boats Fish Dogs Beer cans Chocolate bars Breakfast cereal Coke cans Freeze dried medicine Diet Coke cans Carpet Shampoo Fire Religion Liberals WD-40 … To name but a few

Quantum Mechanical vacuum is not “ Nothing”. The concept of QM is Something. Who thought about it and implemented? That Entity is also Something. Besides it also assumes space-time.

What he means by mystery of God is that you cannot imagine or think or understand the structure of God. Because as he said we are very small people. His views are or do match the explanation by islam or Islamic scholars.

This question is as old as human imagination and is still as inscrutable as it's ever been, or at least almost. It's inscrutable because we simply don't have the evolutionary depth, A.K.A. brain power to fully apprehend any answer commensurate with the utter totality of the question. I'll use this analogy again. If we quizzed our ancestors two million years ago about Einstein's theory of relativity or quantum mechanics they'd be as nonplussed as we are today in attempting to explain ultimate reality. However we have a much firmer grasp of how our universe works and its history. One could take the purely intellectual position that the human mind is incapable of fathoming ultimate mystery and that's all there is to it, but there's another aspect to this question that's worth considering, and it's essentially and inescapably theological. If I subscribe to a theistic interpretation of how the universe came into existence, and that must mean a transcendent agent, my question then becomes what is my relation to this transcendent power. If I further grant that the process by which our cosmos came into existence seems formulaic, intentional, and designed, as modern cosmology describes then it seems this transcendent agent is a knowing, self lucid force that expresses itself in and through the evolved emergent complexity we see throughout the universe, and we are exhibit A in this process. You may ask what does this have to do with the title page question of Mr Kuhn's CTT episode. Here's my answer though yours may be different. Take the question of what constitutes ultimate reality and pose it inwardly to who you think you are or who I think I am. You'll find it's just as difficult to offer any definitive answer. Here's my attempt to answer this profound question. If you ask me who I am, my answer would likely be my name and history, occupation and so forth, but these are only outward states and conditions that this thing I call "me" is presently experiencing, and yet even when I do experience anything from a poetic thought to a toothache I still have the real psychological sense of being "removed and separate" from these things and this carries over into every experience I've ever had or ever will. Have you ever heard a survivor speak about going through an horrific and extended period of pain or privation? They nearly always talk as though they were an observer to their suffering. This begs the question; what and who exactly is doing the observing? At the center of our being is a space where one thing is permitted to reside, and until that one thing does reside there, no other force or power can claim that space. This doesn't mean we can't be distracted by small things but these annoyances are peripheral and have no life beyond the confusion that spawns them. Something quiet, reassuring and reflective is at the heart of who we are. This immutable essence is in type and kind the same immutable essence that expresses itself throughout the universe through it's most intelligible form consciousness. There is no other way to describe this truth but spiritual. To ask what constitutes ultimate reality is really to ask who we are.

It is simply the nature of reality that there is something. With that, there is no getting around it from a human perspective. We exist in a very strange reality where there is no beginning and no end and it is infinite in every way. I agree with the guest that our reality proceeds God or quantum mechanics. The only answer from a finite human perspective is, that reality simply is and there is no other way for it to be. It seems good if we are uncomfortable with that as an answer. It will give us something worthwhile to do for eternity. I believe it is about the most worthwhile thing to do with life. To look for ultimate answers even if we're not capable of getting them.

1 time after Big Bang at which nuclei of light atoms formed = (c/(149896229/90 m/s^2)) = 3 minutes, describes 1×10^-43 seconds.

Something is a default contingent state eod

Of God vs the quantum vacuum, at 4:16 Robert says "They both seem kind of equivalent". The subsequent conclusion ("no answer" versus "unknowable answer") fails to satisfy. What exists before God? Answer: the void. The void is not empty space. It is a dynamic domain, before space is defined, where "somethingness" attempts to manifest, constrained by the laws of symmetry - the virtual particles. "Because God", as first cause, never explains anything. The void and its phenomenology precedes God, and it is in understanding the void, as a possibility space, that an answer is most likely to be forthcoming. Even God, were He to exist, would probably agree.

I Exist. I will never not exist.

Reality exists in the human mind and nowhere else

The difference between "the law of quantum physics" and God is that God is the epitome of consciousness, fully knowledgeable and eternal in structural existence, whereas the so-called laws of quantum physics are fully dependent on zero probability wherein the laws themselves do not exist due to lack of enforcing element in the state of absolute zero, eternal nothingness. Also it is empirically impossible to explain the origin of the so-called laws.

Nothing doesn’t exist, existence was always here .

Thought test then. It nothing does not exist then, does every thing exist or is that paradoxically wrong also. You can’t prove you saw everything ever can you? So nothing never really exists and everything does not either. What does that mean? Like philosophical infinities in both directions.

Why is there an assumption that the Cosmos came from absolute nothing? And an assertion that nothing is what physics needs to understand and describe? There is something and, in all likelihood, there has always been something. If physics, cosmology or philosophy needs to understand and describe anything it is eternity.

Non- existence not exist neither things (both empirical or abstract) exist. Only Existence is there without anything. All things depends on existence to exist. Like Gold only exist and all forms of gold such as Necklaces, rings, bracelet, etc depends on Gold to exist. But gold does not depend on any of that to exist.

Numerous interviews on why there is something rather than nothing and still no answer that withstands any serious examination.

“God” is as good a term as any for the state that preceded our universe. I feel that God exists and that “God” shares in my existence and I in “God’s”. I feel that “God” created the universe in whole from beginning to end and that our perception of the forward movement in time is an artifact of our inability to know the future. We can successfully intuit the likely future based on the present and the remembered past, but not know for sure. I feel that “God” created the universe to allow existence to be and us to be. So to share our experience. I feel that “God” is omnipresent in space and time. I feel the “God” must allow for natural and optional “evil” for our existence to have real meaning. Just because we can’t know the future with certainty because of our perceptual limitations, doesn’t really matter in our lives experience. We feel like we have agency, even if we don’t.

...Gentlemen, think back to your births, schooling, the great accumulation of knowledge & understanding. You are both so very special, down to your fingerprints. Wow. Your gifts & talents. I believe it is written in Job. Man's knowledge will advance only so far, & no more. Why Something, it is fair to say, because GOD, respectfully, Chuck...captivus brevis...you tube...Blessings...both of you are so very different & special...

Και στο Αφγανιστάν θα πήγαινα αρκεί να ξεφύγω από τη Θεσσαλονίκη

God is the name we give to the mystery... seems like a good start to me.

3:23 ... do you see then God is sort of a name put on a mystery? WD: Yes I we are humans who are fairly small beings in this universe and we are trying form the inside we can't look at it from outside try to reconstruct where we are and what our surrounding is and we have well invented at least in the western language ... 4:00 ... to one approximation if you take the two extreme explanations if there is an explanation one is the laws of quantum physics that bubble up these universes out of nothing and the other is God who creates it out of nothing they both seem kind of equivalent in terms I mean they're radically different in character but equivalent in style because they both are sort of there in a self-existing sense and the claim is that they that's what you start with and so you can have a God do it or you have quantum bubbling do it in one sense if you stand back from it that doesn't seem very much different. WD: I think we must live with uncertainty and a kind of unfinal uh never finished understanding and I'm not too much troubled by that uh htere is a difference I think in if it's kind of scientific story then say like those quantum bubbles well there may be some more specific nature to it you might do something calculations 5:02

Existence can't be explained.

Are you a truth seeker? If you want to know the truth what I write is for you. I want to know if the Quran was memorized or not. I don't want to believe, i want to know. What it would mean for the future of Islam if it is proven the Quran was never memorized? The Quran was never memorized because the task is beyond human capabilities and the question you have to ask yourself is "is it a big or a little lie?". Why muslims lied about such issue?. There is no need to lie about the memorization of the Quran, so why did they lie?. Reality is for everyone the same, whoever discovers the true God wins. At the end of the day the only that matters is to discover the true God because any life is infinitely shorter than eternity. Muslims say "research and read the Quran", as if the reading of the Quran would make you any wiser. Would you read Spinoza? If you read Spinoza is not going to kill you. To not waste this loving poem I say atheism is a logical fallacy that assumes God is the religious idea of the creator of the creation to conclude wrongly no creator exists because a particular idea of God doesn’t exist. The true God is Spinoza's God. To end Islam and the war you have to ask for proof that the Quran was memorized. Trust me. Emergency. Thank you.

A possible answer: The anthropic principle

Nothing doesn’t exist. There are uncountable things. We can’t assume there has been a time - or will be a time when there are less, or more things. It’s not a question of something or nothing.

The fact is that science not only cannot explain existence but does prove that it is impossible to explain existence. And that is a paradox since we already exist. Therefore, to follow what science can lead, we have resolve the paradoxical situation using logic. Godel incompleteness theorem states that an explanation exists beyond our science. A superior power necessarily exists.

god is in my heart therefore he or she is real

how can the future pre-exist before causation?

"In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, “Let there be light.” And there was light. There was still nothing, but you could see it a lot better."

Moses heard: "I am"

There is only a mystery in existence if you want it to be a mystery. This is all a simulation which was created by the powerful ones and we were cast into this place for many different reasons.

A quantum fluction requires that there is at least time and perhaps also space. Nothing, means that, no matter, no space-time no laws of physics, no structure, nothing "Ex nihilo nihil fit"

Rob.. Q&A 😂😂😂😂

GoD is the name of mysterious! Rob..? 😂😂😂

We see nothing all the time. It’s called empty space. So if nothing didn’t exist, we would see everything and then we see would see nothing again because everything and nothing are the same thing. It is because we see nothing that we can at least see something.

It Seems Obvious for Me to come up with Two Examples of the Human Conclusion for a God, by Our Ancestors. (There are Other Possibilities, Another Good One is Lightning) One is the MOON. Another is FAMILY DEATH. Humans would have Encountered these Two Phenomenons from Our Start, Long Ago. Hence One of Our Ancestors, Maybe a Group of Ancestors, had the Chance to Wonder about the MOON :- Easily Observable in the Sky. The Picture of the Moon in the Sky Changes Shape Regularly. The Picture of the Moon in the Sky Changes Location Regularly. The Picture of the Moon in the Sky Changes Colour Regularly. The Moon is Harmless. In the Case of DEATH. Death More than Likely Triggered Emotion First, but then Wonder as to How that Occurred and Why Death. Early Humans Liked Each Other More than Disliked Each Other, this is Why We Exist Now. Then as with Jesus, Our Ancestors Would have Experienced Recovery from what Seemed Like Death, Unconscious to Conscious. Now the Key Point here is Our Ancestors WONDER, they are Conscious More than Any other Life. I Say Wondering Ends Up Splitting into Two Cultures :- What We Call Science Now. What We Call Religion Now. The Other Critical Component in Both these Wonder Cases, Moon, Death, is Human Communication. At the Point of the God Conclusion Our Ancestors Must have been able to TALK. The God Conclusion is Carried Forward by the Human ability to TALK. Hence it is Real Examples of Wonder, Emotion and Talk which causes One of Our Ancestors to become one of the First Geniuses if Not the First Genius. A GOD Created the Moon and causes the Picture of the Moon to Change. GOD Created Death. GOD Gave Us the Ability to TALK. Our Ancestors Concluding a GOD is a Huge Moment of HUMAN IQ. Possible the Defining Moment of Human IQ. We Use Our Wondering to Conclude Something much more Powerful than Us Must have Created the Moon. GOD!. Ancient Science of course Moves Forward Very Slowly. Science Eventually Offers Evolution, The Big Bang as Reasons for the MOON and Humans Ability to TALK. Science Methods, Scientists Seem to Know it has a Problem with Consciousness and Struggles to Explain Why Humans Would Wonder and Conclude, Long Ago. Human Consciousness Creates a Full Circle Moment :- The Ability to Wonder causes the God Conclusion. The God Conclusion Explains Our Ability to be Conscious and WONDER. Something Far More Poweful than Us gave Us the Ability to be Conscious, Including the Tools of Human Consciousness, Brain, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Pain, Voice, Emotion. So Why do Humans, the Moon and the Universe Exist ?. God Knows Why, offers the Something Much Bigger Answer. Science is Constrained by Science and Unfortunately Offers No Sound Science Answer.

I really hate the "beyond our understanding" religious take on things - just a kind of defeatist giving up it seems to me.

AM I AI?

The Question Your Asking Is Wrong What You Should Be Asking Is Why Do I Believe Anything Exist Rather Than The Alternative & Then Study How That Works & You'll Have The Answer To Your Question, The Answer Is Nothingness Is Just That Nothing Therefore Anything Else Is Wrong, We Never Were Real Because There is No Inherent Nature Therefore If You Are Boundless That Presumes Power But Power is a Describing & Asribing Meaning That Is Illusory, The Good News Thou Is That Whatever Is Happening Illusory Or Otherwise Is What Is Intriguing Better Question Should Be Why Is Existence Noumenon Self Contained & How Would That Work Now You Can Understand God At a Basic Level Your Welcome

causation moves forward into the past, and backward into future?

Conviction here is that there is no physical universe out there.

Or . . . the Existence of Mystery. Either way is ok.

The mystery is WHO is in existence.

O, neither God nor the Absolute Reality is different from yourself. Positive and negative don't arise from zero but, from Neutral which is your Real State and It is the source of the universe. Universe exists because you exist. To understand more refer the book: SPACETIME AND THAT BEYOND By A.N.Unnikrishnan.

Believing in God; It does not mean accepting its existence (!) It means accepting that what God says is true. If so; First of all, it is necessary to be sure that the Quran is not a human word. This is possible by measuring the similarity of the Quran with the human word. Afterwards, it is necessary to read and understand the Quran. You can learn the method of measuring the similarity of the Quran to the human word from my studies.

B.S philisophy in church

If you're gonna talk about sci-fi, namely gods and deities, you might as well include the contemporaries, like the Avengers, X-Men, Superman and the few more thousands of modern gods. But, closer to truth, you may not get.

Existence: "I just am, always was, and always will be. Just accept it." 😂

Multiple answers ..Multiple Universes...one God ,..one answer...no God ... no answers..just more questions ..you believe what you believe and be happy ...that will be your answer

Nobody knows how

There is NO such thing as a place called NOTHING . There is either existence or non existence . The light bulb is either on or off , there is NO other state !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thinking of God as being the All That Exists makes more sense.

Interesting. But no closer to truth.

Existence => E=Mc3 -> EARth 🌎 😂😂

🙏🏾yada yada yada 😂

Hahahaha

The sheer superficiality of Kuhn is stupefying.

I am fed up with this guy trying to rationalize existence

Human intelligence caters for human observation and its understanding of everything around it. Divine and enigmatic intelligence is far beyond the comprehension of the human brain.

Our best minds are perplexed -- don't buy the BS.

If God made all this the question then is "why"? Has anyone bothered asking Him?😊