didnt have to do bro like that😂😂

I have had the same error on my friend‘s pc. It works fine on mine tho, i don’t get it.

Depends on what you have in mind. If you're interested in studying it in University level for professional use, you can start with the basics with books, as well as basic tutorials, like BroCode makes, so you can build a base to expand upon later in University. If you just want to have it as a hobby though, you can just look up tutorials on the most need to know languages (C, C++, C#, Python, Java etc). It's mostly a matter of sitting down & making the start. After that it becomes a good learning curve upwards.

@@DS6ProphetLua is an awesome easy starting point

yes make SURE you update app installer in ms store before opening winutil or it will never install properly I had to entirely start over bc of it

Using the word "cringe" has been really cringe lately

​@neb_setabed I agree. I just don't know how else to describe cringe without saying cringe. It's like moist, another cringe word but sometimes things are moist and not damp, or wet. I figured abhorrent was a bit too strong.

​@neb_setabed The inoperative test branch may be attributed to an ongoing refactorization procedure, which, according to software development best practices, should not alter the fundamental functionality of the codebase. A semantic distinction can be drawn between 'refactoring' and 'revising,' with the former process pertaining to non-functional modifications such as optimization or code restructuring for better readability and maintainability without altering input-output behavior. The colloquial utilization of the term 'refactor' to describe transformations that significantly impact the functioning of a software system is an instance of linguistic drift, which has resulted in an erosion of the original semantic boundary between refactoring and revision operations. To preserve this demarcation, one must adhere strictly to the principles of refactoring, ensuring that input-output consistency remains unperturbed throughout the codebase's transformation process. This practice is also upheld during atomic refactorizations, further emphasizing the necessity of retaining a program's functionality while undertaking such procedures.

Better? Lmao

Lol stop being so pedantic. Obvious this is a refactor by moving the internal structure around, but not changing the way the script operated. Yes it briefly broke because the lines were incorrectly referenced, but this is live and not a cut up youtube video.

Same, I had to use a normal iso eventually, the primary partition on micowin is missing

i thought it was just me but 3 iso's 2 different computers later I gave up and used the bloatiso

Just out of curiosity what would be the reasoning for not wanting chocolatey? I've never really used either chocolatey or winget myself so I don't know much about them.

@@neb_setabed Hi, there is nothing wrong with Chocolatey itself. It is like a package manager like we have in Linux. While the Linux package managers are quite streamlined and well maintained, I don't think it is the same for Chocolatey. I might be wrong though but I still do not wish to install it at this time, maybe sometime in the future.