ABSOLUTELY i imagine after a good few minutes of playing itd become background noise like the HUD or your own footsteps but BAM suddenly Dead Silence

Planner: "The alert for abnormal situations must function in all abnormal situations. The removal of the alert system is an abnormal situation" Engineer: "...I have a very annoying idea which is guaranteed to work."

I really want this game now, lol.

Yeah, kind of like the overwatch voice in City17

I feel like that would be a bad idea just because you probably wouldn’t notice the alarm going off immediately because you had grown so used to it you would tune it out, so when it actually went off- by stopping- you may not notice.

I know this comment is very old, but i HAVE to ask. Which tsunami protection wall are you talking about? Are you talking about the one in Kamaishi? That is the only major wall I can think of before 2011, but it failed to hold. In fact, I have never heard of a single wall that managed to stop the tsunami in such a way that nobody in that town died. People are instead talking about how many people probably decided not to evacuate due to a false sense of security. Please provide SOME detail as to what you are referring to.

@@yoyo98b The huge sea wall and floodgates took 12 years to build and had been widely regarded as a £20million folly. But today one former Japanese mayor is being hailed as a saviour after the grandiose construction allowed his small town escaped the devastation wrought by the March 11 tsunami. In the rubble of Japan's northeast coast, Fudai stands as tall as ever after. No homes were swept away. In fact, they barely got wet. The 3,000 residents owe their lives to the late Kotaku Wamura, who lived through an earlier tsunami and made it a priority of his four-decade tenure as mayor to defend his people from the next one.

@@yoyo98b Here is a video on the Fudai Town that defied the Tsunami. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/js6on6V437Tdqp8.html

@@yoyo98b The sad reality, he died being mocked for this 20Mil "waste" of Money. Now he is a hero.

@@sam-psonsmith9951 thank you for replying! Now that a name has been provided, it's actually possible to look up information about it! 😊

And look at how different the result was!

I can imagine the reaction by many officials at the time: "Filters? Filters!? My good man, this installation represents the best of Britain's 20th Century nuclear technology. Whatever could go wrong? Silly man!"

@@AudieHolland its nice to see nuclear technology catch up to cigarette technology

@@echelonrank3927 🤣

In engineering contingency plans while may seem needlessly expensive or over the top those arguments quash fast when a contingency plan ends up engaging and mitigating the damage. The problem with people is they look at it like it will never happen as they take the good conditions for granted weather it be out of ignorance or because they think its a decision that higher ups make just to make more work for less profit. While yes not every contingency plan is a good one and should be critically criticized do keep in mind not every single one is done to waste time as you have to imagine the thinking process on why it implemented and what danger it is readying to combat. A filter on a exhaust in this case is a good one when dealing with devastative resources that a mistake with the system that would expel said things that could cause centuries of consequences that can encompass generations of people in which case such cautions should be thoroughly taken and thought out.

Wrong on both counts.

You can hear it in this video: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/n7t1ZZtlm-DLc3U.html

Wait until he does Kyshtym. Never heard of it? That's because the USSR majorly covered it up. It's only one step down from Chernobyl. He plans to do a vid on it in the future.

@@daffers2345 Is that the incident that Kento Bento did a video on? About the radioactive lake?

Not just nuclear disasters, but as we have just learned pandemics, too. The people in power don’t seem to mind a few thousand deaths of their citizens as long as we stay complacent and productive so they can remain in power.

Instead of saving lives or helping people in case stuff down the road, they're like, NO NO, I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT.

@@alexanderson281 absolutely this. it doesn't benefit them to help us, so they never will.

It makes me wonder how the workers deal with the noise all day? That has to drive you insane.

@@nicolebennett5585 I would think it would be something you would tone out, BUT you would still notice if it suddenly stop because it would be something your brain would have to cease processing.

It’s a very odd way of doing things. Makes me wonder if they are covering up something using the constant noise. 🤔

@@qwave1322 Unknown, but frequency and intensity would be interesting to know because humans speak within a narrow range of what we are able to perceive. Maybe it is trying to tone something they should be knowing "out".

@@nicolebennett5585 I was thinking this too. Wouldn't they eventually just drain it out so the effect of "reminding them of the constant danger" is kind of null? It'd also be interesting to know the effects it has on their hearing

There's an excellent older documentary called "Our Reactor Is On Fire" that's on KZfaq with interviews with him and others involved in monitoring and fire fighting.

Like Chernobyl - blown harmlessly westwards over the UK ! Yes, I remember walking home in the radioactive rain.

Ireland lives in the sea?

@@millomweb The cloud hasnt reached UK, but yeah, that was the soviet thinking at the time.

@@StrazdasLT It was reported on UK news - and they were out with their Geiger counters worrying the sheep and cows.

@@millomweb Yes, but the found nothing. Later analysis by the WHO shows where the cloud spread, you can google the report.

Small quantities of radioactive products can be pretty effectively diluted in the ocean. It's not ideal but it is acceptable. That's what they're going to do with the tritium contaminated cooling water built up at Fukushima, for instance.

It does seem an odd claim to make considering the wind usually blows in the other direction.

It's been blown outside the environment!

'the radioactive material was blown harmlessly over to Ireland, who we don't give a fuck about so it's grand.'

@@nicolebennett5585 About whom we do not give a fuck, you mean. We might have beef with the Irish but at least we get the grammar right.

Badges? We doan need no steenking badges!

Klaus Hergeshieser.. from G section

Funny story from Ohio. Fernald had those badges, they changed color. One day someone left their badge on a cart and it somehow changed color. Apparently no one has been keeping track of their carts and they were extremely irradiated. It was terrible.

This is one of the reasons horror movies and stuff never scare me. Truth is always scarier, in my opinion.

Imagine being assigned to that police or fire department ! Your only job is....hope you never need it .

Isn't that the truth.So scary and it will probably destroy earth. ALL it takes is the nuclear weapons in the wrong hands.

Billion,s to construct and operate nuclear power plants,trillions to store and monitor spent nuclear fuel over hundreds of years or more,what's to go wrong.

May be almost as bad as the effects of the co2 you and I produce daily, concrete and hundreds of years won't be nearly enough to rectify that situation

Get away from my potato’s! 😤

That would at least explain the Watermelon size B**ls on the guys that race on the IOM . . .

I know what a joke. Best quality products made at the minimum of cost.

"Blimey! You want MORE SHOVEL?"

No but here's a paper glove.

"What are you: a coward!? If you're not willing to shovel that stuff, perhaps I should find someone who will!! And fot less too!!" At least that kind of attitude only stayed in F1, eh?

“Bu- but sir! I have a family with two youngins to feed!”

Of course being British English it translates to “pan Galactic cluster fuck” in other dialects 🤓

Absolutely. Only an Englishman would use such terms when describing a potential catastrophe. I love it. I'm Australian.

Not great, not terrible.

@@lesflynn4455 I love it too. Aussies also say the coolest things.

Yeah. When I heard that about the fuel rods, my eyes popped wide. Then he said that...and I was like “that must’ve been what the engineers were saying as they shoveled them back.

I also like that he is very factual and steady. He doesn't add things like conjecture or opinion.

I know! I feel so sorry for the Brits who can't hear his lovely accent. Lol

I would listen to audiobooks narrated by him.

It's as good as always the problem. The technology never failed and when it did, it's because someone thought they could save a few pennies.

Except if you live in Canada, where literally every road has atleast one pothole.

Or don't trust what the government tells you. Also, The government doesn't have the peoples best interest in mind.

@@MrNota500 As it turns out - the government did have peoples best interest in mind as UK went on to haves sucesful nuclear power infrastructure which would have never gotten off the ground if the news were made available and people panicked.

To be fair, the "it could have been worse" was the U.K becoming a real life Fallout game...

@@matthewyeldig4608 So just plain ol' Glasgow then?

@@Sky_Guy Hey man... You said it, not me!

@@matthewyeldig4608 I didn't realize the UK was so populated with robots...

@@trashcatlinol Yeah I know right, the mutants get all the attention just because they're big and green and currently eating Aunt Mildred. Little known fact, the Queen actually is a type of Ghoul, which is why she's lived so long. And don't get me started on the Deathscotts.

May I know why use plastic sheet?

I don't know why they bothered, everyone knows it's Windscale, really.

@@Flo-mj6oi he might be referring to plastic sheets as carving paper. When drawing up documents for a building you use a clear sheet to go over the drawing and you draw on the clear sheet to see if that would improve the building. If it does then you simply add it to the final drawing.

@@starlinguk Maybe in the UK. Hadn't heard of Windscale at all before this video, and my only knowledge that something had gone wrong there once was from the song "Radioaktivität" by Kraftwerk. In it, Sellafield is listed in a row with Hiroshima, Chernobyl and Harrisburg, so it was easy to assume it had to do with radiation. Sellafield was listed though, not Windscale.

@@Flo-mj6oi id assume its for ease of making copies. based on molybdomancer's use of 'in those days', itd be before digital printers. they'd be taking negatives to make a plate for a litho press. might be easier w plastic sheets instead of paper, especially if youre avoiding smudges from erased pencils

For what manufacturer ? - ahh, it's come to me - Mather & Platt - although I think they went out of business ;)

Nothing to worry about. Inside a nuclear facility is about the safest place you can be in. You know why they cost so much? The regulation demands they could continue working even after being literally bombed by an enemy raid. Not just survive, continue working uninterrupted.

"Atomic Accidents" is an awful book. In it, Mahaffey shows a serious lack of general knowledge. He's unaware that oil floats on top of water, or that "oxides" are different from "elements". He's also careless with his illustrations. He identifies as "aerial" a photograph which is not only obviously taken from the ground, but also has the photographer's shadow prominently visible! In another instance, he confidently asserts that sodium-free fast reactors are impossible, on the same page as a schematic diagram of such a reactor. His inability to form logical connections is on clearest display when he blames nearby residents for choosing to live near an unsafe nuclear facility. The facility's owners falsely claimed it was safe, so if we accept Mahaffey's argument, then we must conclude that all nuclear facilities are unsafe and any claims of safety are lies. Presumably Mahaffey does not intend this, since he specifically states in the introduction that he wants to allay fear of nuclear facilities. But that's the source of the problem - the entire book is an exercise in motivated reasoning. For every one of the accidents discussed, Mahaffey finds a way to dismiss it as irrelevant to contemporary nuclear safety. But he does not consider the consequences of his arguments. They are thought of one moment and discarded the next. Mahaffey's carelessness and bad-faith arguments taint "Atomic Accidents". Even the parts that appear correct are of little value when the author is unreliable.

Us from Cumbria especially!

Definitely check out plainly difficult if you don't know about the channel already!

@@ryanboscoe9670 his channel is amazing. His documentaries on little known nuclear incidents are very informative.

Hot take: the linear no-threshold model of radiation exposure risks is bad science and has done more harm than any of the historical releases and accidents ever would have done had the LNT model been disregarded.

Same. It’s humanity wielding a deadly weapon, in our infancy. It’s the stage in sci-fi we hear about as the beginning. Cluuuuuumsy steps forward

I actually think that'd be the case - the Simpsons writers are true nerds, often integrating little shout-outs like that...

Having worked there, knowing people that work there, the similarities with the nuclear power station portrayed on the Simpsons is too worrying to be funny.

Precisely what i was thinking

Haha! Exactly! "THIS WILL SOUND EVERY THREE SECONDS UNLESS SOMETHING ISN'T OKAY!"

But not totally accurate ! The sound - more like a loud ticking clock that echoes around the building. The alarm is not silence - that's a fault with the alarm ! I never actually heard the alarm - maybe that's a good thing :)

You can hear the 'alarm' (that's not an alarm) in this video: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/n7t1ZZtlm-DLc3U.html

For real, imagine a big exclusion zone being there to this day if they hadn't.

That’s why you build things to code. Especially if that thing is a nuclear facility.

@@ORLY911 Not really. Exclusion zones are actual follies. Neither Chernobyl Nor Fukushima zones are actually dangerous. I can understnad Chernobyl being turned into basically a national reserve (the wildlife is thriving, at least before the war) but Japan governments actions are outright insane.

John Weedon I have not. What’s significance?

Be safe, my friend. Used to work nights in warehouses until I had kids.

It doesn't. I mean with nuclear reactors the last disaster was Fukushima and the one before that was Chernobyl. And the newer one was because of a natural disaster, and that place had about three layers of backups that failed. And even then Fukushima could have been averted if there was a company policy that let them cool the reactor with salt water in an emergency. The number of safety provisions in nuclear power these days is mind boggling. On a side note, did you know they can recycle nuclear fuel rods now?

@@GeoRyukaiser ikr. Compare that to literally most other power sources and you realize just how safe nuclear energy really is.

Oh how I wish OSHA had more staff to regularly visit companies.

Well, for one, Not every safety inspector does that. Nor does every site has a safety inspector worth a damn.

I have iodine tablets in my emergency kit at home. Hopefully I'll never have to use them *crossed fingers*

Lovely how thoughtful the Brits are, isn't it?

Yup my family got them to and I think they were at the back of a draw somewhere knocking around for years! Sort thing in a emergency you could never find!

My household got then too, jic Sellafield would become a site for terrorist attacks, as this was months after the 9/11 attacks.

@@moviemad56 It's standard procedure in many many countries. They are cheap and help, so why not.

I believe brick immortar did the sewol ferry

​@@coltburks5450he's also amazing. That video got me emotional when I first watched it,especially the part where the dad is just begging the conference room for the truth.

To me, that's a sign of a REALLY good YT channel, regardless of size - shows a true commitment to making content accessible, which I respect enormously. (And as a transcriptionist & CC operator, I know that creating and syncing such accurate captions isn't an easy-peasy task, so the effort put in is much appreciated!)

To be honest it's something that should be mandated for channels of a certain size - just like regular TV

Doubtful. The levels released where bad, yes, but given that dispersal over distance and the half-life of some radioactive materials is measured in hours the chances of the events being connected are very small. I'm sorry for your loss, though. May your aunt rest in peace.

@@GeoRyukaiserIodine-131 has a half-life of 8 days, and Polonium-210 (which was also released) has a half-life of 138 days. It is entirely possible that people in Ireland could have been affected - if nothing else, fish in the Irish sea was probably contaminated.

English; always looking out for the Irish.

@@kallehalvarsson5808 Possible. But you need to factor in distance, dispersal and average cancer rates without radiation before calling it probable. Unless it can be proven that cancer rates increased after, and that increase was because of, Windscale then its just hating Briton for the sake of hating Briton.

@@GeoRyukaiser Sure, i'm just arguing that half life is not a valid counterargument. I don't see where "hating Britons" should have anything to do with this, i'm a Swede so i'm a completely disinterested party in whatever beef they have with Ireland.

I love this channel. The material really is fascinating - and it's one of the few channels that make me lose my appetite. I, too, appreciate that he is very factual and doesn't add conjecture, and that the videos themselves are made very well. I am waiting for him to do one on Kyshtym; that's another, lesser-known nuclear disaster, and one he said he would do when I suggested it.

@@daffers2345 I LOVE THIS CHANNEL TOO! And how he always adds how things changed and became safer because of the tragedy. Very high caliber channel. I look forward to the new video every week.

ever heard of 'Plainly Difficult'? he is doing similar stuff, maybe you like it

@@schore69 Thanks for the recommendation, I actually checked out his channel about 2 weeks ago. Struggled as he reads from a script and gets his pacing all messed up so it's hard to just listen.

@JoeyBFromKT I just checked that channel out, because I thought it couldn’t be that bad.... But OMG, what’s up with that guys pacing?! It’s not just a flowing variation of pace, nor a stumble on a word here or there (both are fine) - it’s like someone changes the speed on his speech, including his pauses, by as much as 100% every 5-10 secs. I’ve never heard anything like it, and couldn’t take it. A shame, since his content looked solid enough :(

The thing is, nuclear power on its own isn't super dangerous. It's because of imbeciles who refuse basic safety measures that it becomes dangerous. This kind of shit would never happen in modern nuclear plants in first world countries.

It confuses me that they don't think about the astronomical money it could cost if those aren't put in place.

@@SonicBoone56 Watch some United States CSB disaster videos, it'll change your mind on first world countries getting it right.

@@emiwoo9355 I guarantee it's all pre-1980's stuff. Ever since Chernobyl nuclear plants have been under heavy scrutiny. If you want dangerous power, go look at how many accidents related to coal, natural gas, and oil happen daily.

@@SonicBoone56 Not even that with Windscale. We only learned that air-cooled reactors like Windscale were a bad idea, _because of Windscale_. It's easy to criticise it in hindsight and I agree that it wasn't a great design, but I can guarantee that at the time, nobody would've really known this could happen.

Happy FHT!

One of my favorite channels (BrenDaniel) used to have a series called Terrifying Tuesdays. It's a snappy kind-of name. FH is easily one of the best Narrators I've ever heard. I'm pretty sure it's: David Attenborough, Morgan Freeman, FH. 3rd in the World isn't bad!

“Okay dear, I’ll get you a nice ice cream cone with the radiation you like so much!”

Excellent comparison.

"Oppenheimer 's deadly toy" - Sting in his song "Russians."

Whet the alarm's not alarming you then you should be alarmed?

"Do you hear anything?" "No, why?" "No alarms going off, right?" 🤔 "No.... Oh S#1+!" 😱

@@WouldntULikeToKnow. I'm alarmed at this alarming ..... uhm ...alarm

Seems like after a while you'd tune it out and not notice if it shut off. Like smoke detectors chirping to alert you they need batteries

@@vr6swp Who the hell can tune out a chirping smoke detector? Most annoying thing ever.

Usually the safest kind, actually.

Dam failure.

‘Mom’ ‘piss drawer’

chelidon (that part thats on the other side of a elbow) , paper-cut

how about "nuclear war"?

G*d bless a careful engineer.

An autopilot that takes control of aieroplanes would be a good idea.

no it hasnt been forgotten, we just moved on

Correct!!!! 🐩🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

You get those "breaks" when the uploader places timestamps in the description.

It´s a stupid system, so probably. People go deaf to sound they hear constantly, so it wouldnt suprise me if it took minutes for anyone to notice a missing sound. It´s like when your home is near a busy street. After a while you stop hearing the street until you focus on it. You wouldnt notice the sound go away without focus on it though.

It's so sensitive that there are regular "false alarms" from radon leaking out of the bedrock.

he called it the "everything's ok alarm"

best. reference. ever.

@@SangerZonvolt This was my first thought, too. There's no sense in keeping an alarm on all the time!

SIMPSOOOOOOOOOON! *Mr. Burns tries to fire Homer Simpson but status quo is god*

Right! Someone else in the comments mentioned the same. How many brains get used to a repeat sound and automatically tune it out, good or bad.

The “sound” of automatic silence is louder than any actual alarm. I believe this is the thinking.

Strictly speaking, that part of the video is incorrect. These are the alarms employed on the site, the constant tone is present for a partially related reason: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mtp-mrKW1qivgYk.html

Well that's because no matter how many safety systems you put in place there's always going to be someone who is too dumb to save from them self!

Oh this couldn't even produce electricity. The only purpose of the reactor was to produce plutonium. Plutonium that was only to be used to produce the most devastating weapons ever known to mankind.

Remember that news coverage in that era was entirely different than it is now. So it was much easier to downplay things than it would be today. As for the milk disposal, it was touted as a "precautionary measure." About the only folks who raised any fuss about it were the farmers whose milk was being destroyed.

oh my god this is funny

People were very naive back then about nuclear technology

@@WindTurbineSyndrome Correct. Much like asbestos was in its day, nuclear energy was thought to be a 'miracle' technology that would transform us. There were even plans to develop 'mini' nuclear reactors, no larger than a regular furnace, that would heat and power homes.

@@sct913 it still is, sort of. that is why goverments all over the world whenever something went wrong tried to cover it up because its just that good of an energy source. the only downsides are that it puts out a ton of steam and that the waste material is realy hard to dispose of. and that if something goes wrong shit hits the fan on a national level. but other then that the power output is amazing, there are basically no contaminants aside from the steam created by the reactor, you can build a reactor pretty much anywhere and its a fairely reliable source of fuel that wont run out in the foreseeable future. all other sources of power fall flat in at least one of these categories. wind, hydro electric and solar are locational, coal and oil are horrible for the atmosphere, coal, oil and solar are very resource dependent (solar mainly because of the materials needed to build the panels which arent that easy to get), wind and water impact their surronding biosphere, wind, coal and oil cant be build in population centers, solar and wind have a terrible energy output compared to the resources put into creating a powerplant, and nuclear doesnt have any of these issues.

But complete fiction ! Silence would only be caused by a fault in the alarm system.

See if you can hear the 'alarm' in this video: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/n7t1ZZtlm-DLc3U.html

Do you mind telling us?

@@shaunyjimenez9637 of course not. It's a long story though. Thorpe processing plant deals in the waste products from radioactive materials. Through this process a liquid called radioactive liquor is created. This stuff is very similar in nature to the elephants foot in cernobyl. If you are near enough to see it you won't last long so it's stored I designated sites. All this is fine & legal. The part that isn't is that somehow this radioactive liquor has leaked out of Thorpe plant (guessing through a cracked in the concrere foundations of thorpe from excessive heat created by nuclear waste) and has began leaching into the ground. So aside for the radioactive waste, Sellafield motto is basically 'once it goes past our site boarders it's no longer our problem'...not that they'd actually say that about the now radioactive farm land surrounding the site.

@@ashleighclark6866 someone... should do... something??? like, that's really bad considering how often it floods etc in cumbria, who's your MP please alert them

@@experiment35 I no longer live there. Let's put it this way also if the local mp cares they would let people swim in the water off St.bees beach as that is where the nuclear waste water is pushed back to shore from the outlet pit...they don't care. The nuclear industry brings in far too much money for the area.

@@hayleighdodge298 I know. It was even worse training in the engineering sector because Sellafield poach level 3 Btec students. They approached me twice and I turned them down, they're a very toxic company & have been voted one of the worst places to work in the UK.

Same!

Me to it’s definatly been educational

I got scared when he mentioned the graphite blocks. Chernobyl had graphite blocks too, which was part of their problem. When they went to re-insert the rods to cool things down, it was too late because the blocks had shattered. TMI had water, and the reason they had trouble was a faulty valve that indicated a full tank ... still, I always thought water was better than blocks of anything.

@@daffers2345 pretty much all gen-2 design plants have graphite rods. The water cooling system cools the rods, not the fuel directly.

@@StrazdasLT Thanks for the info. Needless to say, I know next to nothing about nuclear reactors!

I believe the Andes flight has been done, but the Sultana is a good one. It makes me sad it's been forgotten.

The Sultana would be a really good one.

@@happyfacefries I live in Marion, AR where the sultana sunk. We have a small museum dedicated to it and a yearly “festival” on the anniversary.

It's not an alarm ! More like a loud grandfather clock ticking.

I hope so too but, given that other horror/true disaster/etc. creators have all said that YT often demonetises them across the board for subject matter, alone, it may not be that simple.

Me too!

Rather like air brakes on trains. Releasing the air sets the brake, so that if there's a leak, or the line gets broken, the air escapes, & stops the train.

It would take me a second to notice. I don't like it.

@@happyfacefries Silence indicates a fault, not an alarm. The alarm would be alarming !

I was thinking of suggesting that. Maybe you can email him (I think he has his email in the link) and mention it. They are still rebuilding, thankfully, and it looks like they'll be able to restore it.

I don’t think it ever STOPPED burning since it was built 😂 (jk)

@@FailingArtist what's so funny?

I think he has an email in the description. You can email him a suggestion. I did, and he said he'd do it in a future vid.

@@daffers2345 ohh okay thank you!

There are already good YT vids about it

@@gillymac9363 I know but I wanna see his take on it and how he’d cover it :)

Looks like he got a more recent event to cover - Astroworld 2021

Don't worry, I'm British and very interested in this sort of thing and I've never heard of it either

As someone who lives in the same county, I have never heard of this

😂

People are hella irritated when the noise they are accustomed to suddenly stops.

@@stephaniesews6603 I don't think anyone gets irritated when an alarm stops... It's a relief in any normal circumstances.

@@aeixo2533 She said a noise people were accustomed too.

​@@krashd Thanks for the clarification, I was unable to read that when she wrote it, but now that you've written it again, I can see....

I would guess that it is a psychological effect. So many people ignore actual alarms as "false" when they first go up or just a "test". If you have a constant sound that only stops in the case of an emergency, there is no doubt that there is an emergency versus "oh is that a false alarm". I would also think that it can't be easily overwritten to just start the alarm back up, versus an alarm turning on where they can override like the Smiler incident. I am not an alarm expert, just watched too many documentaries where they were like hey let's override this and carry on as usual.

More info: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rsWgisqD3Z3QnqM.html

It wouldn't have been that bad, but it would have been bad. Like Chernobyl bad. Thank God and Cockcroft for those filters. Yeah, safety has to be integral, but ever hear about "Normal accidents"? Sometimes "safety" makes things worse.

But consider how eerie it would be if the alarm fell silent. 😱

The "all is ok" alarm isn't quite correct, that one is for another purpose. These are the actual alarms. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mtp-mrKW1qivgYk.html